QCD in magnetic fields - uni-frankfurt.deendrodi/endrodi_dpg17.pdf · and qB are commensurable) I....
Transcript of QCD in magnetic fields - uni-frankfurt.deendrodi/endrodi_dpg17.pdf · and qB are commensurable) I....
QCD in external magnetic fields
Gergely Endrodi
Goethe University of Frankfurt
81. Jahrestagung der DPGMunster, 28. March 2017
in collaboration with
Gunnar Bali, Falk Bruckmann, Zoltan Fodor, Matteo Giordano,Sandor Katz, Tamas Kovacs, Stefan Krieg, Ferenc Pittler,Andreas Schafer, Kalman Szabo, Jacob Wellnhofer
Outline
I preface: magnetic fields and latticesI lattice quantum chromodynamics
I role of Landau levelsI order parameterI magnetic catalysis
I nonzero temperatureI phase diagramI applications
I summary
1 / 21
Magnetic fields and lattices
Experiments
I conductance of graphene lattices in strong magnetic fields[Ponomarenko et al Nature 497 ’13, Dean et al Nature 497 ’13][Hunt et al Science 340 ’13]
[Ponomarenko et al ’13] [Dean et al ’13]
2 / 21
Landau versus Bloch
• free charged particleI exposed to magnetic field in continuum space: Landau orbits
I on a (crystal) lattice: Bloch waves
• what happens if the two are combined?
3 / 21
Landau versus Bloch
• free charged particleI exposed to magnetic field in continuum space: Landau orbitsI on a (crystal) lattice: Bloch waves
• what happens if the two are combined?
3 / 21
Landau versus Bloch
• free charged particleI exposed to magnetic field in continuum space: Landau orbitsI on a (crystal) lattice: Bloch waves
• what happens if the two are combined?
3 / 21
Hofstadter’s butterfly [Hofstadter ’76]
• relativistic electrons in a magnetic field in 2D [Endrodi ’14]
Bmax ∝ 1/a24 / 21
Hofstadter’s butterfly at low magnetic fields
I Landau levels are visible at low B [Endrodi ’14]
λ2 = 2n · B5 / 21
Hofstadter’s butterfly at low magnetic fields
I Landau levels are visible at low B [Endrodi ’14]
λ2 = 2n · B5 / 21
Hofstadter’s butterfly at low magnetic fields
I Landau levels are visible at low B [Endrodi ’14]
λ2 = 2n · B5 / 21
Hofstadter’s butterfly at low magnetic fields
I Landau levels are visible at low B [Endrodi ’14]
λ2 = 2n · B5 / 21
Translation to lattice QCD
From quantum mechanics to QCD
I non-interacting electrons strongly interacting quarkssmears out butterfly
I quantum mechanics quantum field theory with pathintegral
Z =∫DAµDψDψ e−S
S =∫
d4x[1
4TrFµνFµν + ψ( /D + m)ψ], /D = γµ(∂µ+igsAµ+iqAµ)
I crystal lattice as a regulator
pmax ≈ 1/a
continuum limit: a→ 0
I energies (measureable) Dirac eigenvalues(not measureable)
6 / 21
The butterfly in lattice QCD
I continuum limit a→ 0⇒ lowest Landau-level can be separated in full QCD(related to topology) [Bruckmann, Endrodi et al ’16]
7 / 21
The butterfly in lattice QCD
I continuum limit a→ 0⇒ lowest Landau-level can be separated in full QCD(related to topology) [Bruckmann, Endrodi et al ’16] 7 / 21
The phases of QCD
Chiral condensate
I physical observable in QCD:condensate of quarks with mass m
ψψ =∑λ
mλ2 + m2
I for m = 0: order parameter for chiral symmetry breaking
SUL(Nf )× SUR(Nf ) ψψ−−→ SULR(Nf )
8 / 21
Chiral condensate
I physical observable in QCD:condensate of quarks with mass m
ψψ =∑λ
mλ2 + m2
I for m = 0: order parameter for chiral symmetry breaking
SUL(Nf )× SUR(Nf ) ψψ−−→ SULR(Nf )
8 / 21
Chiral condensate
I physical observable in QCD:condensate of quarks with mass m
ψψ =∑λ
mλ2 + m2
I for m = 0: order parameter for chiral symmetry breaking
SUL(Nf )× SUR(Nf ) ψψ−−→ SULR(Nf )
8 / 21
Phases of QCD
I chiral symmetry breaking and confinement go hand in hand
ψψ ⇔ PI can be probed by the temperature
[Borsanyi et al ’10, Bruckmann, Endrodi et al ’13]
[Aoki, Endrodi et al ’06]
9 / 21
Phases of QCD
I chiral symmetry breaking and confinement go hand in hand
ψψ ⇔ PI can be probed by the temperature
[Borsanyi et al ’10, Bruckmann, Endrodi et al ’13]
[Aoki, Endrodi et al ’06]
9 / 21
Phases of QCD
I chiral symmetry breaking and confinement go hand in hand
ψψ ⇔ PI can be probed by the temperature
[Borsanyi et al ’10, Bruckmann, Endrodi et al ’13] [Aoki, Endrodi et al ’06]
9 / 21
Condensate in magnetic fields
Landau-levels
lowest Landau-level:I λ well below other eigenvaluesI multiplicity is proportional to magnetic flux Φ = B · L2
higher Landau-levels:I λ >
√2B
• if B sufficiently large, only lowest LL matters10 / 21
Chiral condensate
I physical observable in QCD:condensate of quarks with mass m
ψψ =∑λ
mλ2 + m2
I for B � m2, lowest LL approximation
ψψ ∼ BL2 ∑λ∈ lowest LL
mλ2 + m2
I implication: ψψ increases with B‘magnetic catalysis’ [Gusynin et al ’95]
11 / 21
Magnetic catalysis at T = 0
I magnetic catalysis from first principles[Bali, Bruckmann, Endrodi, Fodor, Katz, Schafer ’12]
lowest LL
I magnetic catalysis is a robust concept: captured by NJL,χPT, AdS/CFT and further models [Andersen, Naylor ’14]
12 / 21
Magnetic catalysis at T = 0
I magnetic catalysis from first principles[Bali, Bruckmann, Endrodi, Fodor, Katz, Schafer ’12]
lowest LL
I magnetic catalysis is a robust concept: captured by NJL,χPT, AdS/CFT and further models [Andersen, Naylor ’14]
12 / 21
Magnetic catalysis at T = 0
I magnetic catalysis from first principles[Bali, Bruckmann, Endrodi, Fodor, Katz, Schafer ’12]
lowest LL
I magnetic catalysis is a robust concept: captured by NJL,χPT, AdS/CFT and further models [Andersen, Naylor ’14]
12 / 21
Summary
lowest Landau-level
⇓
magnetic catalysis
13 / 21
Nonzero temperature
Condensate at nonzero temperatures
• going to finite temperatures changes the response qualitativelyinverse magnetic catalysis around Tc[Bruckmann, Endrodi, Kovacs ’13]
14 / 21
Condensate at nonzero temperatures
• going to finite temperatures changes the response qualitativelyinverse magnetic catalysis around Tc[Bruckmann, Endrodi, Kovacs ’13]
14 / 21
Condensate at nonzero temperatures
• going to finite temperatures changes the response qualitativelyinverse magnetic catalysis around Tc[Bruckmann, Endrodi, Kovacs ’13]
14 / 21
Phase diagram
• impact on the QCD phase diagram: Tc(B) decreases[Bali, Bruckmann, Endrodi, Fodor, Katz, Krieg, Schafer, Szabo ’11]
15 / 21
Phase diagram for very strong fields
I go to even stronger B-fieldsI nature of transition changes from crossover to first order
[Endrodi ’15]
16 / 21
Applications
Applications: heavy-ion collisions
I off-central events generate magnetic fields[Kharzeev, McLerran, Warringa ’07]
I strength: B = 1015 T ≈ 1020Bearth ≈ 5m2π
I impact: chiral magnetic effect, anisotropies, elliptic flow,hydrodynamics with B, . . .reviews: [Fukushima ’12] [Kharzeev, Landsteiner, Schmitt, Yee ’14][Kharzeev ’15]
17 / 21
Applications: magnetars
I neutron stars with strong surface magnetic fields[Duncan, Thompson ’92]
I strength on surface: B = 1010 TI strength in core (?): B = 1014 T ≈ 1019Bearth ≈ 0.5m2
π
I impact: convectional processes, mass-radius relation,gravitational collapse/merger [Anderson et al ’08], . . .
18 / 21
Applications: early universe
I large-scale intergalactic magnetic fields 10 µG = 10−9 TI origin in the early universeI generation through a phase transition: electroweak epoch
B ≈ 1019 T [Vachaspati ’91, Enqvist, Olesen ’93]
19 / 21
Applications: low-energy models
I effective theories / low energy models of QCD:incorporate relevant degrees of freedom / mechanismsfor example PNJL model [Gatto, Ruggieri ’11]
eB=19
eB=15
eB=10
eB=0
160 170 180 190 200 2100.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
T HMeVL
S�S
0
I models work at low T but not around TcI phase diagram just the opposite of the lattice resultsI some important ingredient is missed [Andersen, Naylor ’14]
[Braun et al ’14, Muller et al ’15, . . . ]20 / 21
Applications: low-energy models
I effective theories / low energy models of QCD:incorporate relevant degrees of freedom / mechanismsfor example PNJL model [Gatto, Ruggieri ’11]
C+ΧSB
D+ΧSR
TT
Χ
P
TB=0 =175 MeV
0 5 10 15 200.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
eB�mΠ2
TΧ,TPHM
eVL
I models work at low T but not around TcI phase diagram just the opposite of the lattice resultsI some important ingredient is missed [Andersen, Naylor ’14]
[Braun et al ’14, Muller et al ’15, . . . ]20 / 21
Summary
C+ΧSB
D+ΧSR
TT
Χ
P
TB=0 =175 MeV
0 5 10 15 200.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
eB�mΠ2
TΧ,TPHM
eVL
21 / 21
Backup
Hofstadter’s butterfly [Hofstadter ’76]
I true fractal structure (if the lattice is infinite)I energies accumulate into bands if flux Φ ∈ Q
(2π/a2 and qB are commensurable)I energies isomorphic to the Cantor set if Φ 6∈ Q
(2π/a2 and qB are incommensurable)
1 / 2
Hofstadter’s butterfly [Hofstadter ’76]
I true fractal structure (if the lattice is infinite)I energies accumulate into bands if flux Φ ∈ Q
(2π/a2 and qB are commensurable)I energies isomorphic to the Cantor set if Φ 6∈ Q
(2π/a2 and qB are incommensurable)
1 / 2
Mechanism behind MC and IMC
• two competing mechanisms at finite B[Bruckmann,Endrodi,Kovacs ’13]
I direct (valence) effect B ↔ qfI indirect (sea) effect B ↔ qf ↔ g⟨
ψψ(B)⟩∝∫DAµ e−Sg det( /D(B,A) + m)︸ ︷︷ ︸
sea
Tr[( /D(B,A) + m)−1
]︸ ︷︷ ︸
valence
BB BB
2 / 2
Mechanism behind MC and IMC
• two competing mechanisms at finite B[Bruckmann,Endrodi,Kovacs ’13]
I direct (valence) effect B ↔ qfI indirect (sea) effect B ↔ qf ↔ g⟨
ψψ(B)⟩∝∫DAµ e−Sg det( /D(B,A) + m)︸ ︷︷ ︸
sea
Tr[( /D(B,A) + m)−1
]︸ ︷︷ ︸
valence
2 / 2