QCD at the LHC: What needs to be done?
description
Transcript of QCD at the LHC: What needs to be done?
QCD at the LHC:QCD at the LHC:What needs to be What needs to be
done?done?
West Coast LHC MeetingWest Coast LHC Meeting
Zvi Bern, UCLAZvi Bern, UCLA
Part 2: Higher Order QCD
OutlineOutline
• General overview• Examples of importance of higher order QCD• Experimenters’ wish lists• What is the problem? Evils of unphysical formalisms.• The S-matrix reloaded: unitarity, twistors, and
recursion.• Recent calculations and promise for the future• What needs to be done.
Overview
QCD at hadron collider involves a number of complex issues:
• Parton distribution functions• Parton Showers• Monte Carlos• Underlying Events• Hadronization • Resummation • Higher order QCD very definite calculations need to be done.
Steve Ellis’ talk
Example:Example: Higgs + 2 jets from Weak Boson FusionHiggs + 2 jets from Weak Boson Fusion
Purpose: After discovery of Higgs Boson measure HWW coupling
Background uncertainty can be reduced with an NLO calculation.
Example: Susy SearchExample: Susy Search
•Early studies using PYTHIA over optimistic.
ALPGEN vs PYTHIA
• PYTHIA does not properly model hard jets.
• ALPGEN is based on LO matrix elements and is better at modeling hard jets.
• What will disagreement between ALPGEN and data mean? Hard to tell. Need NLO.
Merging NLO with Parton ShowersMerging NLO with Parton Showers It is important to merge NLO with parton showering.• Soft and collinear emission properly treated with parton showers.
Standard tool for experimenters.• Hard emission treated properly by NLO. Standard tool for theorists
MC@NLOFirst example ofmerging NLO with shower Monte Carlo
See Dave Soper
The Gold Standard:The Gold Standard: NNLO Drell-Yan Rapidity Distributions NNLO Drell-Yan Rapidity Distributions
•Amazingly good stabilty• Theoretical uncertainties less than 1%
What needs to be done at NLO?
Experimenters to theorists: “Please calculate the following at NLO”
Theorists to experimenters:
“In your dreams”
More Realistic Experimenter’s Wish ListMore Realistic Experimenter’s Wish ListLes Houches 2005
Bold action is required even for this
State- of-the-Art NLO QCDState- of-the-Art NLO QCD
Five point is still state-of-the art in QCD:
Typical examples:
Brute force calculations give GB expressions – numerical stability?
Amusing numbers: 6g: 10,860 diagrams, 7g: 168,925 diagrams
Much worse difficulty: integral reduction generates nasty determinants
It It Is TimeIs Time to Dream to Dream
To attack the wish list need new ideas:
• Numerical approaches.
Promising recent progress.
• Analytic on-shell methods: unitarity method, on-shell recursion, bootstrap approach
Binoth and Heinrich Kaur; Giele, Glover, ZanderighiBinoth, Guillet, Heinrich, Pilon, Schubert; Soper and Nagy; Ellis, Giele and Zanderighi;Anastasiou and Daleo; Czakon;Binoth, Heinrich and Ciccolini
Bern, Dixon, Dunbar, Kosower; Bern and Morgan; Cachazo, Svrcek and Witten; Bern, Dixon, Kosower;Bedford, Brandhuber, Spence, Travaglini;Bern, Dixon, Del Duca and Kosower;Britto, Cachazo, Feng and Witten;Berger, Bern, Dixon, Kosower, Forde
Why are Feynman diagrams clumsy for multi-parton processes?
• The vertices and propagators involve gauge-dependent off-shell states. This is the origin of the complexity.
• To solve the problem we should rewrite perturbative quantum field theory.
• All steps should be in term of gauge invariant on-shell states. • Radical rewriting of perturbative expansion needed.
On-shell FormalismsOn-shell Formalisms
• Curiously, an on-shell formalism was constructed at loop level prior to trees: unitarity method. (1994)
• Solution at tree-level had to await Witten’s twistor inspiration. (2004)
-- MHV vertices
-- on-shell recursion
• Combining both give one-loop on-shell bootstrap
(2005)
Britto, Cachazo, Feng, Witten
Cachazo, Svrcek Witten
Bern, Dixon, KosowerForde and Kosower;Berger, Bern, Dixon, Forde amd Kosower
Bern, Dixon, Dunbar, KosowerBern and Morgan
Spinors and TwistorsSpinor helicity for gluon polarizations in QCD:
Penrose Twistor Transform:
Witten’s remarkable twistor-space link:
QCD scattering amplitudes Topological String Theory
Early work from Nair
Witten; Roiban, Spradlin and Volovich
Key implication: There are simple structure in gauge theory amplitudes
Amazing SimplicityAmazing Simplicity
Witten Conjectured that in twistor –space gauge theoryamplitudes should be supported on curves of degree:
Connected pictureDisconnected picture
These structures implyan amazing simplicity in the scattering amplitudes.
MHV vertices for building amplitudes
Cachazo, Svrcek and Witten
Loop AmplitudesLoop Amplitudes Bern, Dixon, Dunbar and Kosower (1994)Bern and Morgran (1995)
Summary of results from early papers:
• Key result: Any massless loop amplitude in any theory is fully determined from D-dimensional tree amplitudes and unitarity to all loop orders. Off-shell formulations are unnecessary.
• Four-dimensional cut constructibility: At one-loop, any amplitude in a massless susy gauge theory is fully constructible from four-dimensional tree amplitudes (even in presence of IR and UV divergences). Use helicity.
• One-loop QCD: If we use spinor helicity for the tree amplitudes we drop rational functions in loop amplitudes, but logs and polylogs all constructed correctly.
Unitarity MethodUnitarity Method
Two-particle cut:
Generalized triple cut:
Three- particle cut:
Unitarity method combines very effectively with twistor-inspired ideas.
Should be interpreted as demanding that cut propagators do not cancel.
On-Shell BootstrapOn-Shell Bootstrap Bern, Dixon, Kosower hep-ph/9708239
• Difficult to find rational functions with desired factorization properties.
• Unclear how to automate.
• Use Unitarity Method with D = 4 helicity states. Efficient means
for obtaining logs and polylogs. Build from on-shell tree amplitudes.
• Use factorization properties to find rational function part.
• Check numerically against Feynman diagrams
Early Approach:
Key problems preventing widespread applications:
Britto, Cachazo, Feng
•On rhs only on-shell tree amplitudes with fewer legs appear.•Evaluate with momenta shifted by a complex amount
An
Ak+1
An-k+1
Tree-Level On-Shell RecursionTree-Level On-Shell Recursion
New representations of tree amplitudes from IR consistency of one-loop amplitudes in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory.
With intution from twistors and generalized unitarity:
Bern, Del Duca, Dixon, Kosower;Roiban, Spradlin, Volovich
on-shell recursion
Simple Proof of On-Shell RecursionSimple Proof of On-Shell Recursion
Proof relies on so little:• Cauchy’s theorem• Basic field theory factorization properties
Consider shifted amplitude :Britto, Cachazo, Feng and Witten
At tree level we know all the residues:
Merging Unitarity With Loop-Level RecursionMerging Unitarity With Loop-Level Recursion
New Features:• Presence of branch cuts.• unreal poles – poles which appear only for complex momenta.
• double poles – S-matrices in general have double poles
• Spurious singularities that cancel only against polylogs. Add rational functions to remove these.
• Double counts between cuts and recursion. These result in overlap diagrams.
Bern, Dixon Kosower;Forde and Kosower;Berger, Bern, Dixon, Forde, Kosower,
Pure phase for real momenta
Five-point exampleFive-point example
Only one non-vanishing recursive diagram:
Assume we already have log terms computed from D = 4 cuts.The most challenging part was rational function terms.
Only two overlap diagrams:
The rational function terms are as easy to get as at tree level!
Six-PointSix-Point ExampleExample
What needs to be done?What needs to be done?• Firmer theoretical basis for formalism is needed:
Large z behavior of loop amplitudes.
General understanding of unreal poles.
Complex factorization of amplitudes.
• Attack experimenters’ wishlist.
• Massive loops -- tree recursion understood.
• Connection to Lagrangian – Space-cone gauge.
• Improved evaluation of triangles or bubble integrals would be helpful.
• Assembly of full cross-sections. Catani-Seymour dipole method.
• Automation for general processes.
Chalmers and Siegel; Vaman and Yao
Carola Berger’s presentation
Badger, Glover, Khoze, Svrcek
Many theoretical and practical aspects
Other ApplicationsOther Applications
A method is even more important than a discovery, sincethe right method will lead to new and even more importantdiscoveries. — L.D. Landau
On-shell method have been applied to a variety of problems.Examples:
• Resummation of MHV N = 4 super-Yang-Mills amplitudes to all loop orders.
• UV Finiteness properties of N = 8 supergravity — Definitely less divergent than people had thought. — Is it finite, contrary the accepted wisdom? We have the technology to find out!
Bern, Rozowsky, Yan; Anastasiou, Bern, Dixon, Kosower;Bern, Dixon, Smirnov; Buchbinder and Cacazho; Cachazo, Spradlin,Volovich
Bern, Dixon,Dunbar,Perelstein,Rozowsky; Howe and Stelle; Bern, Bjerrum-Bohr, Dunbar
SummarySummary
• Analysis of LHC experiments involve complex issues in QCD.
• Higher order QCD is a key issue facing us.
• Conventional approaches have failed to provide full range of desired calculations – time for bold action at NLO.
• New methods
(a) numerical approaches
(b) on-shell methods – reformulation of quantum field theory
• New results for six partons and n-partons
• Much more needs to be done to set up formalism, automation, and construction of physical cross-sections for comparison to data.
Experimenters’ wish list awaits us.