-. . ... - .-.

~.

.

U. S. WUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

Report No. 99900313/79-01 Program No. 51300

Company: ifurdock Incorporated15800 South Avalon BoulevardCompton, California 90220

Inspection Conducted: June 18-22, 1979

Iaspecto . .gv op./z- f4V. H. Hunter, Contract 6r Inspector DateVendor Inspection Branch

Approved b I, -

47- /z -79j,

D. E~. Whitesell, Chief, Components Section I DateVendor Inspection Branch

Summary ,, .

Inspection on June 18-22, 1979 (99900313/79-01)

Areas Inspected: Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and applicable codesand standards, including review actions on previous findings, audits, training,manufacturing process control, and procurement control. The inspection involvedthirty-six (36) inspector-hours on site.

Results: In the five (5) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolveditems were identified in four (4) areas. The following was identified in theremaining area:

Deviation: Manufacturing process control - welding was performed with unauthorizedunit.

} } b'] $4b

g1A7010170 '4*

.

2

Details Section

A. Principal Persons Contac*ed

*H. G. Murdock, Jr. , President*W. B. Parker, Quality Assurance Manager*J. P. Mykkanen, Manufacturing Manager*S. M. Walleman, Assistant Quality Assurance ManagerW. T. Ulco, Quality Control SupervisorS. D. Driscol, Manager, Manufacturing EngineeringR. A. Goodrich, Quality EngineerB. C. Hill, Purchasing Manager

* Denotes those present at the exit interview meeting.

B. Action on Previous Inspection Findings

1. (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 78-01): Failure to conduct requiredannual tool and gage inventory. The inspector verified that the tooland gage inventory had been conducted on April 4,1979.

2. (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 78-01): Failure to prepare requiredsummary ' report with trend analysis. The inspector verified that;

The ASME accepted QA Manual was revised to require the QA managera.to prepare a summary when unsatisfactory trends occur.

b. No unsatisfactory trends have occurred since the last inspection.

C. Audit Control.

1. Objectives

The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:

a. Procedures had been prepared and approved by the vendor thatprescribes a system for auditing which is consistent with NRCrules and regulations, ASME Code requirements, and the vendor'scommitments described in the ASME accepted QA Manual.

b. The audit procedures are being properly and effectively implementedby the vendor.

2. Method of Accomplishment

The preceding objectives were accomplished by:

1155 s46

4

*,

.

3

Review of Section 1.0, Revision C, of the ASME accepted QA Manuala.titled, " Quality Assurance Program" to verify that the vendor hadestablished procedures that prescribe a system for audits.

b. Review of the following documentation to verify that the auditprogram is being effectively implemented:

(1) All internal audits for the preceding two years includingcorrective actions and follow-up audits.

(2) Training and certification for all auditors.

(3) Current internal audit schedule.

c. Interviews with auditors.

3. Inspection Findings

No apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified.

D. Training

1. Inspection Objectives

The objectives of this inspection were:

a. To ascertain that programs are established for indoctrination andtraining of personnel performing activities affecting quality,

b. To ascertain that indoctrination and training measures are effectivelyimplemented.

2. Method of Accomplishment.

The preceding objectives were accomplished by:

a. Review of Section 1.0, Revision C, of the ASME accepte< QA Manualto verify that a program had been established for the i .doctrination

and training of personnel performing activities affecti.g quality.

b. Review of procedure QP-199, Revision 0, titled, " Qualification ofAuditors."

c. Review of training sessions conducted during the preceding year.

d. Review of the current training schedule.

. I15.3 547

"-

4

3. Inspection Findings

There were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identi!;ed.

E. Manufacturing Process Control

1. Objectives

The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that thevendor's manufacturing processes are performed under a controlled systemwhich meets the NRC regulations, ASME Code requirements, and contractrequirements, and is effective in assuring product quality.

2. Method of Accomplishment

The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:

Review of Section 6.0, Revision 0, tit. led, " Control of Constructiona.

Processes," to verify that procedures had been established thatprescribe a control system of the manufacturing processes.

b. Review of travelers 5607, 7864, 7865, and 7869 prior to issue toverify the control system requires shor travelers or processcontrol check list be prepared conta%1ng document numbers andrevisions to which the process must conform and requires allprocesses and test to be preformed by qualified personnel usingqualified 1.rocedures.

c. Review of in orocess travelers 7208, 7440, and 7415.

d. Observed in-progress welding of a reactor end shell sectica fora personnel air lock as identified on t.raveler No. 6627.

c. Interviews with personnel.

3. Inspection Findicy

Deviation

Paragraph 7.14, Section 7.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual requiresthe calibration of all welding units used for Nuclear Construction.

Contrary to this requirement, it was observed that a welder wasusing an uncalibrated welding unit during nuclear constructionactivities.

This item is considered a deviation which was corrected, as foli.ows,prior to the conclusion of the inspection.

1155 48

_

. .,

5

(1) Using approved procedure ar.1 equipment the vendor verified thatthe referenced unit was in : fact within the required voltage /amp range.

(2) The affected part was rejected and dispositioned in accordancewith t'ae approved system.

(3) Training session was held for all welders, inspectors, andrelated supervision personnel.

F. Procurement Control

1. Objectives '

The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify thatt

Documents for procurement of materials, equipment and servicesa.contain the necessary requirements and/or instructions to assurecompliance with applicable NRC and ASME code requirements.

b. A system has been established to assure that purchased materialsconform to the procurement documents.

PurEhased materials are identified for traceability to the applicablec.documentation.

2. Method of Accomplishment.

The preceding objectives were accomplished by:

Review of Sectica 3.0, Revision C of the ASME accepted QA Manuala.titled, " Procurement Control." .

b. Review of the following purchase orders:

(1) No. 25292 for plate material.

(2) No. 28056 for weld electrodes.

(3) No. 71732 for plate material.

c. Review cf the required approved vendor list.

d. Observation of items located in the receiving inspection area.

e. Interviews with personnel.

3. Inspection Findings

There were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.

r- zAqi el a3 >ni

'

.

6

F. Exit Interview

The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in paragraph A)at the conclusion of the inspection June 22, 1979. The inspector summarizedthe scope and findings of the inspection. The management representativeshad no comment in response to each item discussed by the inspector.

Ilb) J

. = . .

O