Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

8
Q7- Evaluation Matt Popli

Transcript of Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Page 1: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Q7- Evaluation

Matt Popli

Page 2: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

PreliminaryLack of continuity

When shooting and editing the shots continuity was lost

Page 3: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Final Piececontinuity

In comparison to the preliminary when we used different shots, continuity between

them was more effective

Page 4: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

PreliminaryLack of planning

• Within our Preliminary we didn't’t plan our story for very long.

• We came up with the idea by quickly discussing and then shooting it.

• I think the lack our structure to our story can be found by seeing how random the story is.

Page 5: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Final PiecePlanning and structure

used a narrative planning sheet to discuss and make a decision on what plot we should use

Made an animatic, creating our shots to see if they were what we wanted to use for our final piece

Made a story board to mind map our ideas of what we wanted our final piece to look like

Page 6: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Preliminary Vs. Final

• Equipment- The transition from using a flip camera to a Canon 550D enabled us to be in more control of how we wanted to use.

Able to focus on different objects when and how we wanted to

Example of a shot focusing on different points

Out of focus- Preliminary

Page 7: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

• Working in a team and communicating was something I felt has improved we communicated more effectively and made sure everyone was on the same page at all times.

• I have learnt many different shots which I have learnt can completely effect the vision and final piece.

Page 8: Q7 evaluation- Matt Popli

Preliminary Vs. Final

• Within our final piece there is more focus and attention given to mise-en scene, sound, editing and camera shots and angles

Out of sync sound effectNew software's used for our Final