PWRI Quarterly Meeting Tentative Agenda
description
Transcript of PWRI Quarterly Meeting Tentative Agenda
PWRI Quarterly MeetingTentative Agenda
PWRI Quarterly MeetingTentative Agenda
December 11-14 - Houston, Texas
PurposePurpose
• To review ongoing contractor work and to critique planned activities. The last meeting in The Hague focused particularly on Tasks 2, 3, and 4 - Matrix Injection, Soft Formations and Stimulation. In addition, an Economics Task was initiated.
• This meeting, while reviewing all Tasks, will focus on Tasks 2, 3, 4 and 6 - Matrix Injection, Soft Formations and Horizontal Wells.
• To review ongoing contractor work and to critique planned activities. The last meeting in The Hague focused particularly on Tasks 2, 3, and 4 - Matrix Injection, Soft Formations and Stimulation. In addition, an Economics Task was initiated.
• This meeting, while reviewing all Tasks, will focus on Tasks 2, 3, 4 and 6 - Matrix Injection, Soft Formations and Horizontal Wells.
• 8:45 - Convene at Chevron’s Facility• 9:00 - Welcome/Opening Remarks: Paul Jones• 9:10 - Summary- Financial Status of the
Project: J. McLennan• 9:20 - Summary - All Tasks: John McLennan
• 8:45 - Convene at Chevron’s Facility• 9:00 - Welcome/Opening Remarks: Paul Jones• 9:10 - Summary- Financial Status of the
Project: J. McLennan• 9:20 - Summary - All Tasks: John McLennan
Monday, December 11Monday, December 11
• 10:30 - Surface Systems: Alastair Simpson
• 10:45 - Break
• 11:00 - Soft Formations (Completions Skin): Tony Settari
• 11:45 to 1:15 - Lunch
• 1:15 - Soft Formations (Damage Model)
• 2:45 - Break
• 3:00 - Soft Formations (Other Data): Tony Settari
• 3:45 - Wrap up: Facilitators- T. Settari, J-L. Detienne
• 5:00 - Adjourn and agree on plans for any follow-on Evening events
• 10:30 - Surface Systems: Alastair Simpson
• 10:45 - Break
• 11:00 - Soft Formations (Completions Skin): Tony Settari
• 11:45 to 1:15 - Lunch
• 1:15 - Soft Formations (Damage Model)
• 2:45 - Break
• 3:00 - Soft Formations (Other Data): Tony Settari
• 3:45 - Wrap up: Facilitators- T. Settari, J-L. Detienne
• 5:00 - Adjourn and agree on plans for any follow-on Evening events
Monday, December 11Monday, December 11
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
• 9:00 - Tasks 2 and 4: Matrix Injection, Stimulation Ahmed Abou-Sayed
• Day is devoted to Tasks 2 and 4 - integrated format based on “The Toolbox”
– Data Management Tool
– Wellbore Hydraulics Tool
– Soft Formations Completions Tool
– Radial Damage Model
– Multilayer Injection Tool(s)
– Multilateral Injection Tool
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
• 9:00 - Tasks 2 and 4: Matrix Injection, Stimulation Ahmed Abou-Sayed
• Day is devoted to Tasks 2 and 4 - integrated format based on “The Toolbox”
– Data Management Tool
– Wellbore Hydraulics Tool
– Soft Formations Completions Tool
– Radial Damage Model
– Multilayer Injection Tool(s)
– Multilateral Injection Tool
Tuesday, December 12Tuesday, December 12
– Fracture Growth Model – Damage Accumulation Model
– Stimulation/Mitigation Selection Model
– Stress changes due to poro- and thermoelastic effects
– Economics Model
– Multilateral Injection Tool
– Fracture Growth Model
• Lunch - 12:00 - 1:15 p.m.
• 4:30 - Wrap Up - Facilitators
• 5:00 - Adjourn and coordinate dinner
– Fracture Growth Model – Damage Accumulation Model
– Stimulation/Mitigation Selection Model
– Stress changes due to poro- and thermoelastic effects
– Economics Model
– Multilateral Injection Tool
– Fracture Growth Model
• Lunch - 12:00 - 1:15 p.m.
• 4:30 - Wrap Up - Facilitators
• 5:00 - Adjourn and coordinate dinner
Tuesday, December 12Tuesday, December 12
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
Horizontal Injectors - Focus for the Entire Day
• 9:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity: Tony Settari
• 10:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity: Ahmed Abou-Sayed
• 10:45 - Break
• 11:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity - Continued
• 11:45 - Lunch
• 1:00 - Case Study - Horizontal Injector: T. Settari
• 2:00 - Wrap Up: Facilitators, T. Settari, L. Murray
• 5:00 - Adjourn and agree on plans for any follow-on evening events.
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
Horizontal Injectors - Focus for the Entire Day
• 9:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity: Tony Settari
• 10:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity: Ahmed Abou-Sayed
• 10:45 - Break
• 11:00 - Horizontal Well Injectivity - Continued
• 11:45 - Lunch
• 1:00 - Case Study - Horizontal Injector: T. Settari
• 2:00 - Wrap Up: Facilitators, T. Settari, L. Murray
• 5:00 - Adjourn and agree on plans for any follow-on evening events.
Wednesday, December 13Wednesday, December 13
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
• 9:00 - Sponsors Only - Closed Door Session Agenda Items could include:
– Location and timing of next meeting.– What action needs to be taken to ensure
appropriate deliverables are met within the time available.
– What changes in direction are required - fine (or heavy duty) tuning?
– Most phases of the contract are scheduled to end early 2001. The project is oversolicited. What should be done with remaining funds?
• 8:45 -Convene at Chevron’s Facility
• 9:00 - Sponsors Only - Closed Door Session Agenda Items could include:
– Location and timing of next meeting.– What action needs to be taken to ensure
appropriate deliverables are met within the time available.
– What changes in direction are required - fine (or heavy duty) tuning?
– Most phases of the contract are scheduled to end early 2001. The project is oversolicited. What should be done with remaining funds?
Thursday, December 14Thursday, December 14
PWRI Financial StatusPWRI Financial Status
December 11-14 - Houston, Texas
First InstallmentSponsorsInvoiced Received
AGIP 50,000 50,000BP 50,000 50,000Canadian Petroleum 21,642 21,642Chevron 50,000 50,000Conoco 50,000 50,000Elf 50,000 50,000Kerr-McGee 50,000 50,000
Maersk 50,000 50,000Marathon 50,000 50,000Mobil 50,000 50,000Norsk Hydro 50,000 50,000Pan Canadian 50,000 50,000Petrobras 50,000 50,000Phillips 50,000 50,000Shell 50,000 50,000Statoil 50,000 50,000Total 771,642 771,642
First Installment Second Installment Third InstallmentInvoiced Invoiced Received Invoiced Received
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
- - - -50,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Anticipated ProjectTotal:
2,271,642 (15 sponsors for 3 years +$21,642.00 from Canadian Petroleum)
Accounts Receivable: 0
Cash Received: 2,271,642
GRI Fee (pro rata from 1 J uly 1998) 107,090
GRI Travel and Meeting Expenses 6,431
Randy Seright Travel Expenses 503
Bank Wire Transfer Fees 129
Unbudgeted Travel (Prior to 9/00) 17,153
September Travel(Invoices received prior to 10/31)
5,987
Total Project Cost 1,387,760
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Contractor Total Cost ofProject
Total Cost thru11/ 30/ 2000
AmountRemaining
Duke Engineering/Taurus 285,249 233,082 52,167e-First (Phalanx) 113,300 111,350 1,950Heriot-Watt University 239,808 243,033 <-3,225>TerraTek 354,313 275,907 78,406Triangle Engineering 148,700 111,095 37,605V.I .P.S. 50,000 50,000 0Advantek International 342,369 226,000 116,369GRI 119,263 113,521 5,742Total Subcontract Cost 1,653,002 1,363,988 289,014
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Produced Water Re-Injection Project Financial SummaryNovember 30, 2000
Contractor Contract$
Travel andODC
EstimatedFutureTravel
Total
Duke $271,396 $3,853 - $275,249Triangle $138,700 - $10,000 $148,700TerraTek $337,996 $6,317 $10,000 $354,313Heriot Watt $223,045 $16,763 - $239,808Phalanx $113,300 - - $113,300VIPS $50,000 - - $50,000Advantek $317,000 $5,369 $20,000 $342,369GRI $110,200 $6,431 $116,631Taurus - - $10,000 $10,000Misc. (Bank fees,non-contractor travel)
$632 $2,000 $2,632
Total $1,561,637 $39,365 $52,000 $1,653,002Anticipated Revenue - - - $2,271,642Anticipated Balance atCompletion
- - - $618,640
Task SummaryTask Summary
December 11-14 - Houston, Texas
• Collection, collation and empirical evaluation of field information.
• Collection, collation and empirical evaluation of field information.
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• [DONE]• [DONE]
• Summary of the physical mechanisms affecting injectivity, propagation and containment.
• Summary of the physical mechanisms affecting injectivity, propagation and containment.
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• In Progress• In Progress
• Review and evaluation of currently available monitoring and well performance procedures for definition of matrix injection effectiveness and/or fracture growth and morphology.
• Review and evaluation of currently available monitoring and well performance procedures for definition of matrix injection effectiveness and/or fracture growth and morphology.
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• Fracture Models• Monitoring Methods
• Fracture Models• Monitoring Methods
• Testing of available tools against field data sets and empirical determinations, where possible.
• Testing of available tools against field data sets and empirical determinations, where possible.
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• Included in Best Practices as Examples
• Included in Best Practices as Examples
• Definition of limitations and required improvements in monitoring and predictive procedures.
• Definition of the merits of improving specific tools and/or monitoring protocols.
• Definition of limitations and required improvements in monitoring and predictive procedures.
• Definition of the merits of improving specific tools and/or monitoring protocols.
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• First is [DONE]• Ready for
second• Models• Tools
• First is [DONE]• Ready for
second• Models• Tools
• Best Practices• Best Practices
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
Task 1: Monitoring Deliverables
• Fracture Models• Monitoring Methods
• Fracture Models• Monitoring Methods
• Acquisition and processing of field and public-domain information.
• Acquisition and processing of field and public-domain information.
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
• Data Evaluation [DONE]
• Literature Review [DONE by HWU]
• Summary of Models [DONE by HWU]
• Data Evaluation [DONE]
• Literature Review [DONE by HWU]
• Summary of Models [DONE by HWU]
• Information Management
• Information Management
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
• Advantek will demonstrate Toolbox shell.
• Advantek will demonstrate Toolbox shell.
• Analysis• Analysis
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
• Mostly applicable to Task 3.
• Mostly applicable to Task 3.
• Protocols• Best Practices
• Protocols• Best Practices
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
Task 2: Matrix Injection Deliverables
• Coreflooding guidelines [DONE by HWU]
• Thermal Properties• Synthesize• Toolbox• Analog to PEA-23
correlation?
• Coreflooding guidelines [DONE by HWU]
• Thermal Properties• Synthesize• Toolbox• Analog to PEA-23
correlation?
• Acquisition and processing of field and public-domain information.
• Acquisition and processing of field and public-domain information.
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
• ELF 3, Statoil Heidrun, Marathon Brae, Phillips, Kerr McGee and public Shell data [DONE].
• Update comparison table of soft formation data sets.
• Analyze Brage data.
• ELF 3, Statoil Heidrun, Marathon Brae, Phillips, Kerr McGee and public Shell data [DONE].
• Update comparison table of soft formation data sets.
• Analyze Brage data.
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
• Determine physical and chemical mechanisms impacting completion, forecasting and injection management.
• Incorporate in Best Practices.
• Determine physical and chemical mechanisms impacting completion, forecasting and injection management.
• Incorporate in Best Practices.
• Development of a simple but realistic damage model. [DONE]
• Applied to a number of data sets. [DONE]
• Stress calculation spreadsheet tool. [DONE]
• Development of a simple but realistic damage model. [DONE]
• Applied to a number of data sets. [DONE]
• Stress calculation spreadsheet tool. [DONE]
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
• Review of current PWRI well performance capabilities in soft formations, above and below fracture initiation pressures.
• Review of current PWRI well performance capabilities in soft formations, above and below fracture initiation pressures.
• DONE• DONE
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
• Exercise models• Assess applicability • If possible, calibrate
existing modeling capability for PWRI in soft formations above and below fracture initiation and/or propagation pressures.
• Exercise models• Assess applicability • If possible, calibrate
existing modeling capability for PWRI in soft formations above and below fracture initiation and/or propagation pressures.
• Spreadsheet model for progressive damage in matrix flow [DONE].
• Applied to five wells of the Shell GOM data and to two ELF3 wells [DONE].
• Spreadsheet model for progressive damage in matrix flow [DONE].
• Applied to five wells of the Shell GOM data and to two ELF3 wells [DONE].
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
Task 3: Soft Formations Deliverables
• Best Practices• Best Practices • Completions Selection Worksheet [DONE]
• Injectivity (skin) of completions [DONE]
• Synthesize
• Completions Selection Worksheet [DONE]
• Injectivity (skin) of completions [DONE]
• Synthesize
• Acquisition and consolidation of field data with special emphasis on methods for preventing and/or removing damage accumulation.
• Acquisition and consolidation of field data with special emphasis on methods for preventing and/or removing damage accumulation.
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• [DONE]• [DONE]
• Acquisition• Acquisition
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• Toolbox• Toolbox
• Analysis• Analysis
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• All available field data have been analyzed.
• Toolbox shell• Analogs and averages• Data management
• All available field data have been analyzed.
• Toolbox shell• Analogs and averages• Data management
• Well Testing• Well Testing
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• Task 1• Real-time damage
model
• Task 1• Real-time damage
model
• Damage Effects and Agents
• Damage Effects and Agents
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• Real-time damage model
• Real-time damage model
• Review of available stimulation and mitigation techniques
• Review of available stimulation and mitigation techniques
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• Tie in with Task 5.• Newsletter article• Ongoing
• Tie in with Task 5.• Newsletter article• Ongoing
• Economics• Economics
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• To be presented by Advantek
• To be presented by Advantek
• Best Practices• Best Practices
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
Task 4: Stimulation/Mitigation Deliverables
• Ongoing• Integrated with
Toolbox• Surface Systems
• Ongoing• Integrated with
Toolbox• Surface Systems
• Acquire, review and process existing field data, experimental data and public domain knowledge on the effect of variations in rock properties on injection well vertical sweep.
• Acquire, review and process existing field data, experimental data and public domain knowledge on the effect of variations in rock properties on injection well vertical sweep.
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
• Ongoing• Incorporate Workshop
in Best Practices• Monitoring and
Testing
• Ongoing• Incorporate Workshop
in Best Practices• Monitoring and
Testing
• Detailed determination of the effect of differential damage.
• Identify techniques to quantify PWRI in layered formations.
• Detailed determination of the effect of differential damage.
• Identify techniques to quantify PWRI in layered formations.
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
• Layered Formations Workshop
• Define Best Practices and summarize available options to minimize the impact of rock property variations on injectivity.
• Layered Formations Workshop
• Define Best Practices and summarize available options to minimize the impact of rock property variations on injectivity.
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
Task 5: Layered Formations Deliverables
• Workshop [“DONE”]• Best Practices - Ongoing
• Workshop [“DONE”]• Best Practices - Ongoing
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.1: Acquisition of Available Data
• Sub-Task 6.1: Acquisition of Available Data
• BP Amoco and Maersk
• BP Amoco and Maersk
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.2: Empirical Correlations/ Physical Behavior
• Sub-Task 6.2: Empirical Correlations/ Physical Behavior
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.3: Wellbore Hydraulics, Injectivity and Flow/Pressure Regimes.
• For input into Best Practices/Toolbox
• Sub-Task 6.3: Wellbore Hydraulics, Injectivity and Flow/Pressure Regimes.
• For input into Best Practices/Toolbox
• Theoretical aspects of flow in horizontals, with emphasis on methods for simulation. [DONE]
• Theoretical aspects of flow in horizontals, with emphasis on methods for simulation. [DONE]
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.4: Matrix vs. Single vs. Multiple Fracturing
• Sub-Task 6.4: Matrix vs. Single vs. Multiple Fracturing
• V.I.P.S. simulation • Sensitivities
• V.I.P.S. simulation • Sensitivities
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.5: Thermal and Poroelastic Effects
• Sub-Task 6.5: Thermal and Poroelastic Effects
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.6: Economics
• Sub-Task 6.6: Economics
• Merged with Economics Task
• Merged with Economics Task
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
Task 6: Horizontal Injectors Deliverables
• Sub-Task 6.7: Guidelines for Best Practice and Diagnostic Tools
• Sub-Task 6.7: Guidelines for Best Practice and Diagnostic Tools
Progress Since September
• Finalize PC version specifications• Initial PC version• Additional refinement of data entry
utility
Progress Since September
• Finalize PC version specifications• Initial PC version• Additional refinement of data entry
utility
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
PC Version
• PC version and Internet version complete in Feb 2001.
• You will use your Internet browser to run it, and it will work exactly the same as the internet version.
• It will include a greatly simplified data entry program.
PC Version
• PC version and Internet version complete in Feb 2001.
• You will use your Internet browser to run it, and it will work exactly the same as the internet version.
• It will include a greatly simplified data entry program.
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
PC Version System Requirements
• Windows 95, 98, NT 4.0, or 2000• Personal Web Server (PWS). PWS is
free and readily available.• Microsoft Access 97 or 2000.• 32 Mb of RAM (128 is recommended)• 200 Mb of hard disk space
PC Version System Requirements
• Windows 95, 98, NT 4.0, or 2000• Personal Web Server (PWS). PWS is
free and readily available.• Microsoft Access 97 or 2000.• 32 Mb of RAM (128 is recommended)• 200 Mb of hard disk space
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
Database Change
The Internet Version currently runs with an Oracle database server. The new Internet version and the PC version use Microsoft Access. The reasons for the change are:
Database Change
The Internet Version currently runs with an Oracle database server. The new Internet version and the PC version use Microsoft Access. The reasons for the change are:
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
Consequences of Database Change
• Modifications are required to the application as well as the data entry program.
• Some functionality is not yet available with the new database. This includes unit conversions.
Consequences of Database Change
• Modifications are required to the application as well as the data entry program.
• Some functionality is not yet available with the new database. This includes unit conversions.
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
Database Change
1. The amount of data stored in the database is smaller than originally anticipated.
2. Oracle is difficult to manage without a lot of experience, and therefore is not a good
solution for the PC version.3. Allows for one program to maintained for
both the Internet and PC.4. Access is cheap and easy to manage.
Database Change
1. The amount of data stored in the database is smaller than originally anticipated.
2. Oracle is difficult to manage without a lot of experience, and therefore is not a good
solution for the PC version.3. Allows for one program to maintained for
both the Internet and PC.4. Access is cheap and easy to manage.
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
What Does it Look Like? What Does it Look Like?
Task 7: DatabaseTask 7: Database
Task 8: Field Validation
Task 9: Economics
Task 8: Field Validation
Task 9: Economics