Pwc Ieg Dmg Div v Final in the Supreme Court of Va Mortion to R-open Due to Fraud on the Court April...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIARECORD NO: ____110156 & 122204_______________

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,Janice Wolk Grenadier

Appellant / Plaintiffv.

ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER HECKMAN EsqAnd

GRENADIER INVESTMENT CO, LTD,And

DAVID MARK GRENADIER Appellees / Defendants,

MOTION TO RE-OPEN DUE TO FRAUD ON THE COURT BY THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

FOR RULING AGAINST THEIR OWN LAWS AND ALLOWING LAWYERS TO BE DISENGENOUS IN COURT IN CIRCUIT COURT

FILINGS AND SUPREME COURT FILINGS

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA CASE # CH010654

Janice Wolk Grenadier 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, VA 22301 [email protected] 202-368-7178 pro se

Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman, Esquire Grenadier Heckman Starace Duffett 649 South Washington Street Alexandria, Va 22314 703-683-9000 Counsel for / pro se - Appellee - Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman & Grenadier Investment Co. LTD till approximately May 28, 2010

Benard J. Dimuro, Esquire (VSB # 18784) [email protected]

Hillary J. Collyer, Esquire (VSB # 50952) [email protected] John M. Tran, Esquire (VSB # 24349) [email protected] DiMuroGinsburg 1101 King Street, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314 703-684-4333 Counsel for - Appellee - Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman & Grenadier Investment Co. LTD from approximately May 28, 2010

Michael J. Wiser, Esquire ( VSB #17630) [email protected] 510 King Street, Suite 416 Alexandria, VA 22314 703-836-7003 Counsel for – Appellee – David Mark Grenadier

1

COMES NOW Appellant with new evidence found on April 28, 2014 in the

Prince William Court shows the disingenuous behavior of the Circuit Court

Judges and the collusion of the Supreme Court of Virginia Chief Judge and

Justices to rule in favor of one of their own.

Appellant includes in this filing all other past filings with this court. With

Record No. 110156

Appeal and other documents

Petitioner’s Response To: Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal

and Record No. 122204 –

Appeal and other documents including and not limited to:

Appellant Response to Show Cause,

Appellant’s Motion in opposition to Appellees Joint Motion for Sanctions pursuant to VA. Code 8.01 – 271.1,

Appellants Motion for Sanctions against Appellees and Appellees Clients pursuant to VA Code 8.01 – 27.1, Cannons of Judicial Conduct and Rules of Professional Conduct

Appellants Request for a Demand/Compel in disclosure of Appellees attorney Michael Weisers Legal fees from July 3, 2013 – September 26, 2013 as their are more charges to Judge’s Chambers then to his own Clients which brings into question the Relationship of the Judge’s, Lawyers and Appellee’s

Opposition to Appellees Joint Opposition to Petitioner/Appellants Motion for Sanctions

Motion to rule the word Frivolous not be allowed in the description of Petitioner / Appellant or her filings as there is nothing Frivolous about the fundamental right to Due Process the basic Freedom that our country stands for – The right to due process with out Fraud from Judges, Lawyers, Elected Officials it is a primary component of Freedom. The right to a Fair Trial – a basic Constitutional right that has been the source of the light of freedom that our country has given the World. Calling the Appellant Frivolous is no different than burning or spitting on the United States of America’s Flag.

2

That Virginia rated 47th and 49th in two separate studies is due the

arrogance and the disingenuous behavior of the Virginia Judicial System

and the Government officials in collusion to protect their own.

For this reason we see: FBI cautions residents of public corruption in

Va.http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/2014/02/18/fbi-cautions-residents-of-public-

corruption-in-northern-virginia/5585877/

WASHINGTON (WUSA) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Washington Field Office is looking to identify any public corruption occurring in Northern Virginia.The FBI says public corruption can occur "when a public official, at any level of government – local, state or federal – does any official act in exchange for money, or other free goods or services, for private gain. Public corruption could also include public employees who take something of value for their own personal gain, thereby violating the public's trust."The FBI says many of their investigations into public corruption start once they receive a tip from someone. If you want to help identify potential criminal activity, the Washington Field Office has set up a Northern Virginia Public Corruption Hotline at 703-686-6225 and you can also e-mail them at [email protected] of the examples of corruption include:

Government officials such as DMV employees, city inspectors, taxing or zoning assessors or other regulatory agency employees, or even town councils or mayors;

Contracting officials at all levels, including those who manage government contracts or regulatory permits; or, school resource officers who manage school accounts;

Local officials colluding with real estate investors to rig the bidding process at foreclosure auctions;

A person representing the judicial branch - a judge, member of the jury or court personnel; or,

A person representing law enforcement, who steals drugs from criminals, embezzles

government funds, falsifies records or smuggles contraband

That in 1990 when the Judges in the Prince William Circuit Court ruled that

they should not hear a case that Ilona Ely Grenadier was involved in set the

tone for the law and showed that the exact type of appearance of

impropriety that Va.Code 17.1.105(B) is designed to avoid, i.e. recused

judges (or judges who should be recused) selecting their successors

instead of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

3

Supreme Court Rule §17.1-105(B) provides:

If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case.

Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman / Appellees as an attorney is guilty of:

1. Being involved in the forgery of an addendum of the Sonia Grenadier Trust to

use to steal funds close to $95,000. For gain in Real Estate close to a value

today of $12 million or more and monthly income of approx. of $150,000 or more.

2. Stealing Herman Grenadier from his Garden at King David and donating his 3

spaces at King David and by all appearance taking a tax donation herself for the

3 spaces. IRS Fraud

3. That Appellees stole the property by all appearance called Bristow Rd., that

Appellant had a Lis Pendens on. That on or around February 13, 1986, where by

all appearance not only did Appellees take funds, Appellees put Appellees name

on a property that by all appearance and documents show belonged in the Trust

of Sonia Grenadier.

4. Appellees Paid GIC partner under the table to be able to take all the tax

deductions.

5. Appellees lied once caught from stealing the funds from the Sonia Grenadier

Trust through her law firm to the other lawyers and Family Members on how

much was stolen.

6. Appellees maliciously and knowingly lying to Appellant regarding funds to

purchase property called 28 E. Bellefonte Ave.

7. Appellees illegally using an attorney to liquidate the GIC property agreement with

an attorney not licensed to do business in Virginia.

5

8. Appellees maliciously manipulating Appellant on July 7, 1990 to get $30,000.

Commission to negotiate and make it look like Appellee Ilona was not involved in

the theft of funds from the Sonia Grenadier Trust.

9. Appellees acting as attorney to Appellant and is holding a note for the $30,000.

10.Appellees manipulating and stealing funds out of the 28 E. Bellefonte

partnership.

11. Appellees misleading and lying in the Federal Bankruptcy court that Appellant

was forced into because of the lies and manipulation of Appellees.

12. Appellees acting as an attorney to protect her illegal actions tried to get

Appellant to sign a Parenting Agreement and Separation Agreement that

benefited Appellees.

13.Appellee a divorce attorney manipulated Appellant into believing Appellant had

no rights to the properties in GIC. Appellees lied, Appellees was aware that at

this point Appellant had participated in all aspects of GIC and running it as well

as putting more money into GIC then Appellants husband which gave Appellant

at least ½ of Appellee ownership in GIC (49%). Appellant never gave Appellees

permission to represent her interests and Appellant has been denied the tax

benefits as well as monthly income off of properties since 1989.

14.That Appellees knowingly as an attorney lied in the Circuit Court of Alexandria in

court, in admissions, filing false / fraudulent documents with court on several

occasions.

15.Appellees Bribed Judges through donations of tables, for donations towards

portraits, and parties.

16.Appellees bragged about giving free legal advice to Judge Brown who proceeded

over case three (3) times.

17. Appellees Bragged on several occasions on her influence over Judges ie Judge

Haddock to Appellant “WE LOVE ILONA, you will never get a fair trial”

18. / Appellees Ilona a lawyer politically/ with some financially supported Clerk of

Court Ed Semonian, Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel, Patsy Ticer, Adam

Ebbin and David Englin.

6

19.The collusion of Patsy Ticer and Judge Kent to set up Appellant with the x-wife

of Judge Kent; Martha Kent informed Appellant “she had no rights, just like

Martha and her family the x-wife of Judge Kent had no rights. That Appellant

needed to move on because she could never win this, because she was no

longer one of them.”

20.Appellees Ilona a lawyer made it clear her ‘HATE” of Catholics when she

informed Appellant “Me and my family had nothing to do with you and your girls

because you raised them Catholic” has since then callously, and maliciously has

shown her “HATE” through her attorney Ben DiMuro, Robin Grenadier, Andrea

Grenadier, Leah Lax Miller aka Lorretta Miller aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan.

Emails will show how much she “HATES” Catholics. The e-mails will show the

collusion to torment Appellant.

21. Appellees used her friendships to influence the Old Boy Network to support her

illegal and unprofessional behavior.

22.Appellees filed a false and disingenuous complaint with the State of Virginia

against King David Cemetery for burying a stranger in her garden. Who

Appellees had signed the appropriate documents for Ruth to be buried in the

garden. The stranger was buried with her Brother the late Judge Albert

Grenadier, Her father Herman Grenadier whom Ilona had stolen from his grave

and moved using according to King David the forged Addendum to the Trust

agreement. The forged trust addendum was also used to donate the 3 grave

sites that belonged to Sonia Grenadier. Emails and documentation from the State

of Virginia can be back this.

23. Appellees refuses to provide the canceled checks used to purchase the garden

or the permission she was given to move Herman and which accounts the funds

came out of to purchase the new garden.

24.Appellees in 1990 represented Appellant as her lawyer in the assignment

document of Appellants commission for a property called Holland Road. Is owed

with the interest from a not a value of $570,000 + refusing to turn over the note or

the money. This money went to keeping Appellees out of jail which Jim Arthur

went in 1993 to jail for 5 years for what Appellees has done.

7

25. Appellees arrogantly has bullied Appellant , manipulated money, the loss of

clients, to protect her own Law License using scare tactics, false pretense and

lies.

26.That Appellees in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea, Robin passed a

rumor around that caused David Grenadier to pull a gun in Appellants home with

Appellants girls in the home.

27.That Appellees hired or as a favor had a gentleman that in collusion with the

Judges of the Circuit Court of Alexandria ( Haddock, Kemler, Dawkins and Clark)

was to drug Appellant and get sexually inappropriate pictures, to rape one of

Appellants daughters or to plant drugs in Appellants home or on Appellants

children to give Judges the power to claim Appellant was incompetent to move

forward in demanding Justice and Due Process.

28.That Appellees in collusion with David Grenadier sold a car which was not

there’s to sell and in e-mails mocked Appellant for not being equal to them to be

able to get justice.

29. Appellees actions have been willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,

oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless.

30.Appellant will be able to show other actions in court that are criminal actions.

31.Appellees collusion with Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan is

shown in these e-mails:

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM

To: [email protected]

something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over

From:[email protected] <[email protected]> Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM

To: [email protected]

8

you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH.

YOU STUPID GOY. YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO

YOUR THICK SKULL. NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING

LIES! BLAMING ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON EASY STREET. WELL

GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.

YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI! YOU HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED! -

That Appellee a lawyer is guilty of the following criminal actions: of being involved in ,

Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the

Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account

through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of

Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy,

Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest – related

to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated

Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and

Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title

18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of

law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title

VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of

1964, 18 USC§ 912. With her Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles,

Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on

the Court, § 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering,

9

etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will be proven with letters,

documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

That Appellees attorneys, have lied in court, lied in court documents

in Circuit Court and to the Supreme Court of Virginia, used bribery,

ex-parte communications with Judges and other criminal activities.

Appellant also reminds this court that under the Preamble, A Lawyer’s Responsibilities

reads in part:

“A lawyer’s conduct should conform to the requirements or the law, both in professional service to clients and in the lawyer’s business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use the law’s procedures only for legitimate purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers and public officials. While it is a lawyer’s duty to uphold legal process.”

“In the mature of law practice, however, conflicting responsibilities are encountered. Virtually all difficult ethical problems arise from conflict between a lawyer’s responsibilities to clients, to the legal system and to the lawyer’s own interest in remaining an upright person while earning a satisfactory living.”

“the legal profession’s relative autonomy carries with it special responsibilities of self-government. The profession has a responsibility to assure that its regulations are conceived in the public interest and not in furtherance of parochial or self-interested concerns of the bar. Every lawyer is responsible for observance of the Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer should also aid in securing their observance by other lawyers. Neglect of these responsibilities compromises the Independence of the profession and the public interest which it serves,”

Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession Rule 8.3 Reporting Misconduct

Is very clear if a lawyer knows of another lawyers illegal actions they are required to report such actions to the appropriate authorities.

Rule 8.4 Misconduct:

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:(a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional

Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b) Commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law;

10

(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to practice law;

(d) State or imply an ability to influence improperly or upon irrelevant grounds any tribunal, legislative body, or public official; or

(e) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law.

This court should keep in mind:

Disciplinary Responsibilities of this court and all courts in Virginia .

1. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons that raises a substantial question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission.

2. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take appropriate action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects should inform the Virginia State Bar.

That the legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions

also have been granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is

unique in this respect because of the close relationship between the profession

and the processes of government and law enforcement. This connection is

manifested in the fact that ultimate authority over the legal profession is vested

largely in the courts.

CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Canon1……………………………………………………………..……..A Judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. Canon 2……………………………………….…………………………A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the Judge’s activities. Canon 3 ………………………………….………………….……………

11

A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

(Part Six, § III of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia integrates the Canons of Judicial Conduct for the State of Virginia stated above.)

That the Treason on the Courts by the Judge’s and the Judge’s they

supervise were willful acts that were and are malicious, violent, oppressive,

fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless

That Appellant will be able to show Appellant was denied her constitutional right of Due

Process in the courts of Virginia for being Catholic and no longer party to the Old Boy

Network.. That under Title 42 § 1983 will show violation of rights protected by the

Constitution and created by Federal Statute that persons employed by the State of

Virginia acting under color of state law violated Plaintiffs Constitutional rights. That two

Chief Judges (Chief Justice The Honorable Cynthia D. Kinser and Hon. Lisa

Bondareff Kemler, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge,) who are or should be held

responsible for the actions of the Judges beneath them in there subversion. That they

are ultimately responsible for the actions in their courts and both are apparently Jewish

and have allowed Judges under their supervision to rule in Favoritism and Cronyism

and for attorneys to be disingenuous in the documents that they filed in court, and under

Judge’s order did not file documents entered into the record in the Plaintiff’s file in the

Circuit Court of Alexandria. The new evidence under the Blog,

jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com and the actual actions of the Judges shows the

collusion and the discrimination against Plaintiff for being Catholic.

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE this court needs to react swiftly and hold the Appellees, Appellees

Attorney’s and the following responsible for the malicious willful acts for their collusion to

knowingly torturing and bullying Appellant. The emotional harm that this has caused

Appellant and her daughters since 1986 by Appellees and 2007 for the remainder of the

people who have acted in collusion with Appellees:

Supreme Court of Virginia - Chief Justice Cynthia D. Kinser

12

Justices - Donald W. Lemons * S. Bernard Goodwyn * Leroy F. Milletter Jr. * William C. Mims * Elizabeth A. McClanahan * Cleo Powell

Senior Justices – Harry L. Carrico * Charles S. Russell * Elizabeth B. Lacy * Lawrence L. Koontz Jr Clerk of Court – Patricia L. Harrington

State of Virginia Legislator – Courts of Justice – Dave Albo * Henry Marsh

Representatives of the City of Alexandria – Senator Patsy Ticer (Ret) * Senator Adam Ebbin * Delegate David Englin

Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC) – Donald CurryVirginia State Bar (VSB) – Edward Davis * James Michael McCauley

Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Judges & Illegal appointed Judges – Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock * John Kloch * Lisa B. Kemler * Nolan B. Dawkins * Thomas A. Fortkort * J. Howe Brown * John J. McGrath Jr. * James C. Clark * Richard Bowen Potter Chief Judge O’Brien (PWC)

Clerk of Court of the City of Alexandria – Ed SemonianCommonwealth Attorney of the City of Alexandria – Randy Sengel

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Alexandria Division - Judge Gerald Bruce Lee

General Circuit Judge - Judge Richard J. McCue

Criminals – Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman – Lawyer/Officer of the Court – Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler and Law Firm David Mark Grenadier

Lawyers - Michael J. Weiser Esq. Ann Schmitt Heather Jenquine - Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler PC et al lawyers DiMuroGinsburg – Ben DiMuro * John Tran * Hillary J. Collyer – Andrea Mosley

Law Firms – Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Keisler PC DiMuroGinsburg Reed Smith

City of Alexandria Lawyers - Megan S. Roberts, George McAndrews, James L. Banks Jr.

Misc - Diane Fiske Martha Kent Ann Schmidt Leah Lax –aka- Loretta Lax Miller –aka- Muggy Cats –aka- Billy Sullivan Andrea and Robin/Rachel Grenadier

13

That a Grand Jury should be instructed to have a Special Grand Jury look

into the Criminal Actions of all involved. That Sanctions and the demand to

make Appellant whole financially for all her lose and because these actions

were and still are willful acts that were and are malicious, violent,

oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless. Appellant should be

awarded appropriate damages for the actions of all involved.

Respectfully Submitted,

Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro se Appellant 15 West Spring Street

Alexandria, Virginia 22301 202-368-7178 [email protected]

CERTIFICATE of SERVICE

Pursuant to Rule 5:17, I hereby certify that

The appellant is Janice Wolk Grenadeir pro seThe appellee is Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Esquire & Grenadier Investment Co Ltd was represented by Grenadier, Anderson, Starace & Duffett till around May of 2010 the following counsel started representing Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Esq and Grenadier Investment Co Ltd

Dimuro Ginsburg PCJohn Tran EsquireBenard J. Dimuro, Esquire908 King Street Suite 200Alexandria, Virginia, 22314703-684-4333

The appellee is David Mark Grenadier represented by:

Michael J. Weiser, Esquire510 King Street Suite 416Alexandria, Virginia 22314

A copy of this Motion was mailed to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia on April 30, 2014 e-mailed and mailed to counsel for Appellees..This 30th day of April 2014

Janice Wolk Grenadier

As John F Kennedy said “The cost of freedom is always high, but

Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose,

and that is the path of surrender, or submission” and “There are risks

14

mailto:[email protected]

and costs to action. But, they are far less than the long range risks of

comfortable inaction.

15

Pwc Ieg Dmg Div v Final in the Supreme Court of Va Mortion to R-open Due to Fraud on the Court April...

Documents

Transcript of Pwc Ieg Dmg Div v Final in the Supreme Court of Va Mortion to R-open Due to Fraud on the Court April...