PURPOSE: Discuss the need for quality components of the School Improvement Process in our culture of...
-
Upload
myra-harris -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of PURPOSE: Discuss the need for quality components of the School Improvement Process in our culture of...
PURPOSE: Discuss the need for quality components of the School Improvement
Process in our culture of “raising the bar” to Career and College Readiness.
By Doug GreerOAISD School Improvement ConsultantFebruary 22, 2012 to Hope College
Take responsibility for your own learning – stay with us
Support the learning of your colleagues – make sure they stay with us
If you need to take a call or have a side
conversation, please step into the hall
If you have a question, ask along the way.
Do we need to improve teaching and learning based on the current realities?
What is the School Improvement process, both in terms of compliance and practical application?
Other questions that you have that I should address throughout the presentation…
Perception is influenced on your “public” support & positivity! (½ full)
Growth depends on your critical evaluation of data and proper framing of “success.” (½ empty)
Current Realities – National Data
Four decades ago America had the best high school graduation rate in the world, but by 2006 it had slipped to 18th out of 24 industrialized countries.
As recently as 1995, America still tied for first in college and university graduation rates, but by 2006 had dropped to 14th. That same year it had the second-highest college dropout rate of 27 countries.”
Power Point reflects direct excepts from the Benchmarking for Success Report
Whe
re D
oes
Mic
higa
n Ra
nk in
ACT
Sco
res?
Overall Ranking
2009MI = 47th
OR4th out of 5 for schools
who test nearly 100%
http
://w
ww
.act
.org
/new
s/da
ta/0
9/st
ates
.htm
l
MEAP/MME New Cut Scores Historical Perspective◦ Why should you ignore
the OLD Cut Score Proficiency rates in blue ?
◦ What does the NEW Cut Score Proficiency rates in green tell you when compared to the Ottawa Area and Michigan State averages.
Trends in Math and Science Studies (TIMSS) Report
Math Topics (4th and 8th Grade Study)US – 78 in 180 daysJapan – 17 in 253 daysGermany – 23 in 220 days
Length of TextbooksU.S. 4th grade math--530 pagesInternational math--170 pagesU.S. 4th grade science—397 pagesInternational science—125 pagesUS tends to teach out of “encyclopedias”, commonly referred
to as “a mile wide and an inch deep.”
20
Meet Devyn Greer (2010/11) who may be enrolling in 2nd Grade next week at your school district.
What information would you like to know that should be shared with his teacher and possible support staff?
• Compliant, kind, eager to please, highly engaged …• Perfect Attendance, healthy, involved parents …• Tech survey: Computer, web, iPad, apps, smartphone• Math: Delta Math, report card, MAP …• Reading: MLPP, DIBELS Next, Brigance …
2:10
21
Collect DataCollect DataWhat do you already know?What data do you need to know?What additional information/data do you need to know?Where can the information/data be found?
Achievement/ Student
Outcome Data
How our students perform on local, state and federal
assessments (subgroups)
Demographic or
Contextual Data
Describes our students, staff, building, and community
Process Data
The policies, procedures, and systems we have
in place that define how we do
business
Perception Data
Opinions of
staff, parents, community and
students regarding our
school
A Collaborative Problem Solving Approach to Student Achievement
Now that you know … what’s next? Should we simply place the data on in a notebook and put it on a shelf?
How do we know if it is working or not?
2:15
StudentAchievement
StudyAnalyze Data
Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives
Research Best Practice
Michigan Continuous School Improvement School Process RubricsSchool Process Rubrics
(mid-February)(mid-February)
School DataSchool Data Profile/Analysis Profile/Analysis
(mid-April)(mid-April)
Summary Report/Summary Report/Goals ManagementGoals Management
School Improvement Plan (mid-May)School Improvement Plan (mid-May)
Program Evaluation Program Evaluation (June and on-going)(June and on-going)
Annual Education ReportAnnual Education Report(mid-August)(mid-August)
GatherGetting Ready
Collect District DataBuild District Profile
PlanDevelop Action PlanS.M.A.R.T Objectives
DoImplement Plan
Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan
School Process Profile/Analysis
(SPR 40 or SPR 90 or SA or ASSIST SA)COLLECT staff perception around each of the 40 or
90 rubrics by committee or survey or whole staff.
DISCUSS an identified, focused list of indicators by celebrating a few and highlighting 3-5 that may need systemic improvement or simply greater attention.
REPORT results and evidence on AdvancED website.
HELP: Google Doc Survey available for the SPR 40 indicators for gathering staff perceptions.
I.2.A.3 Reflection and RefinementA collaborative culture that incorporates a philosophy of continuous improvement exists at the school or within a
program. Staff members work as teams to gather and analyze information and make decisions regarding the
modification of their instructional practice.
27
SDP/A = School Data Profile/AnalysisCOLLECT data into a single source (Notebook, word
document, file folder, etc.) following the state template. INCLUDE LOCAL DATA as well!
DISCUSS data collected and answer the 82 analysis questions, plus identify conclusions on “strengths” and “challenges” that lead to Goal & Gap statements (SIP).
REPORT how you answered each of the 82 questions on AdvancED website. Store collected data do NOT upload.
HELP: Word Template has been created to link IRIS reports and supply embedded, interactive MS Excel tables for data entry and EASY year-to-year updates.
Buildings will need to collect data, analyze the Buildings will need to collect data, analyze the data, and answer questions related to the data data, and answer questions related to the data
analysis on the AdvancEd website.analysis on the AdvancEd website.
All questions All questions MUSTMUST be answered online … best be answered online … best to simply be honest even if “data not available to simply be honest even if “data not available
at this time”.at this time”.
Schools are Schools are REQUIREDREQUIRED to keep this data in their buildings. to keep this data in their buildings.However, data will However, data will NOTNOT be entered on the website. be entered on the website.
Some of the data reports are NOT pre-populated. The Some of the data reports are NOT pre-populated. The State does not include ELPA and certainly any of State does not include ELPA and certainly any of
your local data. Therefore you will find IRIS (Data your local data. Therefore you will find IRIS (Data Warehouse) useful to obtain these types of data sets Warehouse) useful to obtain these types of data sets
for the SDP/A.for the SDP/A.
powered bypowered by
NWEA (MAP)NWEA (MAP) SRISRI Delta MathDelta MathCommon AssessmentsCommon Assessments DIBELSDIBELS ACT PlanACT PlanACT ExploreACT Explore WRT RubricsWRT Rubrics STARSTAR
What Questions do you have What Questions do you have around …around …
1.1. Process Rubrics (SPR or SA)Process Rubrics (SPR or SA)2.2. Data Profile/Analysis (SDP/A)Data Profile/Analysis (SDP/A)
Questions around Questions around GATHERING or GATHERING or STUDYING (aka STUDYING (aka Defining the problem)Defining the problem)
StudentAchievement
StudyAnalyze Data
Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives
Research Best Practice
Michigan Continuous School Improvement School Process RubricsSchool Process Rubrics
(mid-February)(mid-February)
School DataSchool Data Profile/Analysis Profile/Analysis
(mid-April)(mid-April)
Summary Report/Summary Report/Goals ManagementGoals Management
School Improvement Plan (mid-May)School Improvement Plan (mid-May)
Program Evaluation Program Evaluation (June and on-going)(June and on-going)
Annual Education ReportAnnual Education Report(mid-August)(mid-August)
GatherGetting Ready
Collect District DataBuild District Profile
PlanDevelop Action PlanS.M.A.R.T Objectives
DoImplement Plan
Monitor PlanEvaluate Plan
SIP = School Improvement PlanCOLLECT data from SDP/A and SPR 40 (or SA). DISCUSS gaps seen in both state and local data
and challenge targets identified on SPR 40. Based on these achievement gaps, choose a research based strategy (broad) and develop an action plan and how to monitor. May reference template found at
http://www.advanc-ed.org/mde/online_resources_and_tools
REPORT all components of the SIP onto the AdvancEd website aligned to the SIP Template.
Goal Statement (Broad)A generalized statement of achievement for all students …
“All students will be proficient in ________”
Measurable Objective Statement (Specific)(Written as a S.M.A.R.T. Goal. Targeted student achievement level on specific learning
focus … “Who will do what by when as measured by what”)(Specific GLCEs/HSCE’s/ACT College Readiness Standard, Common Core)
Strategy Statement (Broad)What teachers/staff will do instructionally to help students reach the measureable
objective (must be a Research or Evidence Based Intervention).
Activity (Specific)What teachers/staff will do to implement the strategy with fidelity.
(Getting ready to implement, implement, monitoring implementation)
36
Stage Two Study: Step 5 Set Measurable ObjectivesStage Two Study: Step 5 Set Measurable Objectives
Specific clearly defined beyond global statements
Measurable tied to data which allows for objective evaluation
Attainable able to do but still challenging
Results-focused Progress monitoring. Measure outcomes, not activities.
Time-bound set within a specific timeframe
One Common Voice – One PlanOne Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School ImprovementMichigan Continuous School Improvement
SMART Objective
37
SMART Measureable Objective: All students will increase skills in the area of numbers and operations on MEAP and Local assessments:
• The percentage of all students reaching 80% accuracy on math portion of the MEAP will increase from 28% (2010-11) to 40% by 2012-13 school year.
• The average percent achieved on the MEAP will increase from 52% (2010-11) to 70% by 2013-14 school year.
• The percentage of Economically Disadvantaged (ED) students reaching 80% accuracy on the MEAP will increase from 21% (2010-11) to 38% by 2012-2013 school year.
• Whereas the percentage of non-ED students reaching 80% accuracy on the MEAP will increase from 33% (2010-11) to 44% by 2012-13 school year.
• The number of students identified as “At Risk” on the Fall Delta Math screener will reduce from 58 (2010-11) to 22 by the Spring of 2012.
• The number of students identified as “Benchmark” on the Fall Delta Math screener will increase from ___ to ___ by ____
Goal: All students will be proficient in math.
38
SMART Measureable Objective: All students will increase skills in the area of numbers and operations on MEAP and Local assessments:
• The percentage of all students reaching “College and Career Readiness” on the ACT (Explore/Plan/MME) will increase from 47% (2010-11) to 65% by 2012-13 school year.
• The average score achieved on the ACT Explore/Plan/MME will increase from 21.6 (2010-11) to 23.5 by 2012-13.
• The percentage of students scoring below 18 on the ACT MME (or Explore or Plan) will decrease from 21% (2010-11) to 15% by 2012-13 school year.
Goal: All students will be proficient in math.
Goal Statement (Broad)A generalized statement of achievement for all students …
“All students will be proficient in ________”
Measurable Objective Statement (Specific)(Written as a S.M.A.R.T. Goal. Targeted student achievement level on specific learning
focus … “Who will do what by when as measured by what”)(Specific GLCEs/HSCE’s/ACT College Readiness Standard, Common Core)
Strategy Statement (Broad)What teachers/staff will do instructionally to help students reach the measureable
objective (must be a Research or Evidence Based Intervention).
Activity (Specific)What teachers/staff will do to implement the strategy with fidelity.
(Getting ready to implement, implement, monitoring implementation)
Teachers/staff will ”provide timely intervention for struggling students” in reading comprehension.
Quote from Dr. Tim Westerberg as 1 of 6 key strategies in Becoming a Great High School: 6
Strategies and 1 Attitude that Make a Difference.
42
Teachers/staff will utilize manipulatives while instructing GLCEs/HSCEs related to number and
operations in mathematics.
45
SMART Measureable Objective: All students will increase skills in the area of numbers and operations on MEAP and Local assessments:
• The percentage of all students reaching 80% accuracy on math portion of the MEAP will increase from 28% (2010-11) to 40% by 2013/14 school year.
• The percentage of all students scoring below 40% accuracy on math portion of the MEAP will decrease from 18% (2010-11) to 12% by 2013/14.
Goal: All students will be proficient in math.
Research-based StrategyTeachers/staff will use manipulatives while instructing GLCEs
related to numbers and operations.
Activities: (Resources, Skills, Actions & Monitoring)The Administrator will purchase manipulatives aligned with
concepts in numbers and operations at each grade level.The SIT will plan professional development regarding appropriate
use of manipulatives.Teachers will utilize manipulatives in an appropriate manner
aligned with training provided within each math unit.The Administrator will monitor and note the use of manipulatives
during walk-through and the evaluation process.
Implementation is a Process!
Monitor Implementation Evaluate Implementation
Monitor Impact Evaluate Impact
Adult Focused
Student Focused
MONITOR MONITOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
(Formative)
IS IT WORKING?
EVALUATEEVALUATE THE
IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
(Summative)
DID IT WORK?
ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
BEING IMPLEMENTED WITH
FIDELITY?
ARE WE COLLECTING &
USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA
TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATIO?
DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE
PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY &
CONSISTENTLY?
IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING?
ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT
GROWTH?
WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE
SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA?
HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT
THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS?
DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME?
ENOUGH RESOURCES?
Implementation: Adult Focused Impact: Student Focused
MONITOR EVALUATE EVALUATE MONITOR
DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN
INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT?
WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD)
HAVE OCCURRED?
A Collaborative Problem Solving Approach to Student Achievement
How do these components play a role in student achievement?
How do these components play a role in instructional planning?
How do these components play a role in building level systems?
How do these components play a role in your life TODAY?
Questions around …Questions around …1.1. School Improvement School Improvement
ProcessProcess
Feel free to contact:Feel free to contact:Doug GreerDoug [email protected]@oaisd.org877-702-8600 ext. 877-702-8600 ext.
41094109
Quick share out …Quick share out …(Feedback)(Feedback)