Purpose and Need 1. Importance of Purpose and Need 2 Understanding federal requirements for...

25
Purpose and Need 1

Transcript of Purpose and Need 1. Importance of Purpose and Need 2 Understanding federal requirements for...

1

Purpose and Need

2

Importance of Purpose and Need

Understanding federal requirements for development of P&N statements

Know that a good P&N is the foundation for NEPA and project development

The relationship of P&N to all areas of project development – from project initiation through design and construction - and all other aspects of environmental assessment

Understand the relationship between Purpose and Need, Alternatives and Logical Termini and Independent Utility

3

The Purpose and Need Statement

The Purpose and Need Statement:

Clearly identifies and quantifies the transportation problems and other need elements defined for the study area so that independent utility is established

Adequately address logical termini for the purpose of establishing the design, concept and scope of the study/project

Does not restrict the consideration of other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements within the project’s area of influence

Must be adequate for use in the evaluation of the planning-level conceptual alternatives being considered

4

Federal Law, Regulation, Policy & Guidance

Law National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969

Regulations CEQ regulations to implement NEPA, 40 CFR 1502 FHWA regulations to implement NEPA, 23 CFR 771

Policy and Guidance FHWA Technical Advisory, T 6640.8a (10-3-87) Memorandum on P&N (9-18-90) FHWA Guidance on Purpose and Need (7-23-03) FHWA Guidance on the Development of Logical Termini (11-5-93) FHWA Guidance on Linking Planning and NEPA (2-22-05) CEQ 40 most asked questions

5

40 CFR 1502.13

CEQ Definition of the Purpose and Need Statement:

The statement shall briefly specify the underlying purpose and need to which the agency is responding in proposing the alternatives, including the proposed action

6

Purpose and Need - Definition

The “Purpose” states clearly and succinctly why the project is being proposed and the intended positive outcomes

The “Need” describes the key problem(s) to be addressed and explains the underlying causes of those problems. The driving force for the project should be a transportation need.

It provides the factual foundation for the statement of the project’s purpose

7

The P&N Defines:

The P&N is the critical part of the environmental document that:

Explains to the public and decision-makers why the expenditure of funds is necessary and worthwhile

Establishes the priority of the project relative to other transportation needs/projects in the area

Provides justification that although environmental impacts may be caused by the project, the purpose and need should justify why the impacts are acceptable based on the project's importance

8

Components of the Purposeand Need Statement

The Purpose and Need Statement provides:

Definition of transportation problems/objectives Information on the adequacy of current facilities to handle

present and projected traffic (what capacity is needed and the level of service for the existing and proposed facilities)

Information on factors such as safety, system linkage, social demands, economic development, and modal interrelationships, etc., that the proposed project will attempt to address

Establishes logical termini/independent utility Cornerstone of the Alternatives Analysis

Does NOT discuss solutions Guides development, evaluation & elimination of

alternatives Coordinate/communicate with stakeholders Manages controversy Ensures decisions are legally defensible

9

Format: Project History

Provides a background of previous studies

Illustrates how the project was initiated and what has been done to date

State differences between current study and other studies demonstrating that this does not duplicate them

Legislative mandates

Part of long range plans, MPO studies, etc.

Current status of the study/project

10

Format: Purpose Statement

Clear and concise Not a description of the project and should not contain

solutions/proposed improvements Typically one or two sentences in length State the intended positive outcomes

Example statement for a widening project (the needs are congestion, crashes & roadway geometrics)

The purpose of the proposed project is to improve mobility, safety, and access along a heavily traveled portion of US 23 between Worthington and Delaware by addressing existing transportation needs

11

Format: Need Elements

Existing transportation problem(s)

Data that is factual and can be quantified (use performance measures/analysis), ideally in priority order

Discuss existing, future & desired conditions related to the need

Public/social/economic demands should be acknowledged

Modal interrelationships should be highlighted – that the project will enhance other modes and intermodal relationships or that it will not preclude non-highway modal projects

12

Need Elements

Safety

High crash locations “Hot Spot” locations Highway Safety

Program candidates

13

Need Elements

Congestion

Traffic Counts Forecasted traffic (ADT) –

planning level traffic, certified traffic

Travel Demand Level-of-Service (LOS)

14

Need Elements

Roadway Geometrics

BeforeAfter

Roadway standards Design standards Pavement conditions

15

Need Elements

Facility Deficiencies

Sufficiency ratings Geometric standards and design Bridge design deficiencies Bridge conditions

16

Need Elements

Emergency Repairs

17

Need Elements

Economic Development

18

Format: Goals and Objectives

Not a required element – they are optional, should be acknowledged and considered as secondary alternative evaluation factors

Part of a project’s desired outcomes

Examples: improving pedestrian access, developing a gateway, opening up areas for economic development, etc.

May be appropriate to incorporate them into the project design later in the PDP

Often part of a community’s visioning document or master plan

19

Format: Summary

Simply and succinctly - restate the purpose statement

Highlight and summarize the need elements

20

Logical Termini and Independent Utility Guidance

FHWA regulations outline three general principles at 23 CFR 771.111(f) that are to be used to frame a highway project in order to ensure meaningful evaluation of alternatives and to avoid commitments to transportation improvements before they are fully evaluated:

Connect logical termini and be of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope

Have independent utility or independent significance, i.e., be usable and be a reasonable expenditure even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made

Not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements

21

Logical Termini

Logical Termini

Where the transportation problem begins/ends

Rational end points for a transportation improvement typically major traffic generation points such as

intersecting roadways or where traffic volumes change i.e. increase or fall off

Geographic boundaries (county lines, rivers, etc.) are not generally used. If a project ends at a geographic boundary the “project study limits” should be extended to the nearest state or federal system roadway.

Rational end points for a review of the environmental impacts Generally broader that the strict construction termini

22

Independent Utility

Independent Utility

A project must be able to function on its own without further construction of an adjoining segment

The project is usable (stand alone) and is a reasonable expenditure even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made

Interaction with intersecting elements

Does not rely on separate actions or preclude future improvements

23

“Just the Facts”

Eliminate FLUFF Clear and concise Do not include solutions/improvements Opinions do not count Factual and quantified data

Avoid subjective words: May, maybe, likely, could

Avoid words with legal interpretations Significant Segment Hazardous

24

End Result

Defines existing transportation problem(s)

Presents a fact-based justification for the project focusing on a quantitative verification of the transportation need(s)

Identified need(s) help establish logical termini and independent utility

Creates a baseline to evaluate, eliminate or advance alternatives

Does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other transportation improvements

25

FHWA Contacts

Carmen Stemen, Planning and Environment SpecialistFHWA Ohio Division200 N. High St. Rm. 328Columbus, OH 43215(614) [email protected]

Noel Mehlo, Environmental LeadFHWA Ohio Division200 N. High St. Rm. 328Columbus, OH 43215(614) [email protected]