pure.au.dkpure.au.dk/portal/files/67811070/Bibliography_on... · Web viewNatural Law and Moral...

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES

Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2013)

Please feel free to circulate.

Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to [email protected].

The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual

history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology.

Journals

Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936-

Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940-

Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002

History of European Ideas, 1980-

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983-

ARR, 1989-

Intellectual History Review, 1996-

The European Legacy, 1996-

Redescriptions, 1997-

History of Intellectual Culture, 2001-

Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003-

Modern Intellectual History, 2004-

Contributions, 2005-

Ideas in History, 2006-

Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007-

Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2012-

1

Literature

Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge,

Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 1936

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “The Historiography of Ideas”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical

Society, vol. 78, no. 4, 1938, pp. 529-543

R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.

1, no. 1, 1940, pp. 3-23

R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946

Franklin L. Baumer, “Intellectual History and its Problems”, Journal of Modern History, vol.

21, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191-203

John Higham, “The Rise of American Intellectual History”, American Historical Review, April,

1951, pp. 453-471

George Boas et.al., Studies in Intellectual History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

1953

Peter Laslett, “Introduction”, in John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press 1960

Crane Brinton, “Introduction”, in Brinton, Ideas and Men. The Story of Western Thought,

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1963, 2. ed.

Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of

Philosophy”, History and Theory, 1965, pp. 33-66

R.S. Crane, “Philosophy, Literature, and the History of Ideas”, in Crane, The Idea of the

Humanities and other Essays Critical and Historical, vol. 1, Chicago & London: University of

Chicago Press 1967

Peter Gay, “The Social History of Ideas: Ernst Cassirer and After”, in Kurt H. Wolff &

Barrington Moore (eds.), The Critical Spirit. Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, Boston:

Beacon Press 1967

Louis O. Mink, “Change and Causality in the History of Ideas”, Eighteenth-Century Studies,

1968, pp. 7-25

Johannes Sløk, Hvad er idehistorie? Et programskrift, København: Gyldendal 1968

John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, Philosophy, April 1968, pp. 85-103

Johannes Sløk, Fylde eller tomhed, København: Gyldendal 1968

2

Georg Boas, The History of ideas. An Introduction, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons

Klaus von Beyme, Politische Ideengeschichte. Probleme eines interdisziplinären

Forschungsbereiches, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969

John Higham, “Part II: Polarities in Intellectual History, chap. 2. Intellectual History and its

Neighbors; 3. The Study of American Intellectual History”, in Higham, Writing American

History. Essays on Modern Scholarship, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press

1970

Felix Gilbert, “Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods”, in Gilbert & Stephen R. Graubard

(eds.), Historical Studies Today, New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1972

Reinhart Koselleck, “Einleitung”, in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze & Reinhart Koselleck (eds.),

Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in

Deutschland, vol. 1, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1972

Hayden White, The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore &

London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1973

Philip P. Wiener, “Towards Commemorating the Centenary of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s Birthday

(October 10, 1873)”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 4, 1973, pp. 591-598

Philip P. Wiener, “Preface”, in Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, New York:

Charles Schribner 1973

F. E. L. Priestly, “Mapping the World of Ideas. Review of the Dictionary of the History of

Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, 1973, pp. 527-537

Gordon J. Schochet, “Quentin Skinner’s Method”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 261-

276

Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”, Political

Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 277-303

Masao Maruyama, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan, Princeton University

Press 1974 [1940-44], “Introduction”

Gerald Izenberg, “Psychohistory and Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 14, 1975,

pp. 139-155

Arnaldo Momigliano, “A Piedmontese View of the History of Ideas”, in Momigliano, Essays in

Ancient and Modern Historiography, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977

3

Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel

Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New

York: Cornell University Press 1977

Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol.

17, nr. 2, 1978, s. 175-206

Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns

Hopkins University Press 1978

Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T.

Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979

John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History,

Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979

Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History”

Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences”

David A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals”

Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind”

Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised”

Henry F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History”

Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition

Addressed”

Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History”

Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture”

David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in Seventeenth-

Century New England”

Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the

Professions”

Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect”

Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture”

John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, in Dunn, Political Obligation in its

Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980

Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980

4

Robert Darnton, “Intellectual and Cultural History”, chap. 14 in Michael Kammen (ed.), The

Past Before Us. Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, Ithaca & London:

Cornell University Press 1980

William J. Bouwsma, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: From the History of Ideas to the

History of Meaning”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 279-291

J.G.A. Pocock, “The Reconstruction of Discourse: Towards the Historiography of Political

Thought”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 96, no. 5, 1981, pp. 959-980

Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse”, in Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-

Structuralist Reader, Boston, London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Pail 1981

Joel Colton, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: The Case for the Defense”, Journal of

Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 293-298

J.G.A. Pocock, “Afterword: The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and

Ideology”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 53, 1981, pp. 49-72

Ernst Schulin, “German ‘Geistesgeschichte’, American ‘Intellectual History’ and French

‘Historie des Mentalités’ since 1900. A Comparison”, History of European Ideas, vol. 1, no. 3,

1981, pp. 195-214

Dominick LaCapra & Steven L. Kaplan (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History.

Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1982

Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French

Trajectories”

Dominick LaCapra, “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts”

Martin Jay, “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on

the Habermas-Gadamer Debate”

Hans Kellner, “Triangular Anxieties: The Present State of European Intellectual

History”

Mark Poster, “The Future According to Foucault: The Archeology of Knowledge

and Intellectual History”

E.M. Henning, “Archeology, Deconstruction, and Intellectual History”

Keith Michael Baker, “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French

Revolution”

Peter Jelavich, “Popular Dimensions of Modernist Elite Culture: The Case of

Theater in Fin-de-Siècle Munich”

5

David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents”

Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry

Adams”

Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca &

London: Cornell University Press 1983

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab

Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities,

Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983

Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and

the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study

in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983

Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra:

Croom Helm 1983

Preston King, “Introduction”

Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem”

Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian”

Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism”

R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer”

Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History”

A.O. Lovejoy, “The Study of the History of Ideas”

Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography”

Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History”

John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition”

Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts”

Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes”

John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual

History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British

Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174

Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind &

Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984

6

Peter L. Janssen, “Political Thought as Traditionary Action: The Critical Response to Skinner

and Pocock”, History and Theory, vol. 24, 1985, pp. 115-146

David Boucher, Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas,

Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Conal Condren, The Study and Appraisal of Classic Texts. An Essay on Political Theory, Its

Inheritance, and the History of Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1985

Rolf Reichardt, “Einleitung”, in Reichardt & Eberhard Schmitt (eds.), Handbuch politisch-

sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1985

Michael Ermarth, “Mindful Matters: The Empire’s New Codes and the Plight of Modern

European Intellectual History”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 57, no. 3, 1985, pp. 506-527

Stefano Collini, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 46-48

Michael Biddiss , “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 49-50

Quentin Skinner, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 50-52

J.G.A. Pocock, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 52-53

Bruce Kuklick, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53

Michael Hunter, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53-54

J.G.A. Pocock, “Introduction: The State of the Art”, in Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History.

Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge:


David A. Hollinger, In the American Province. Studies in the History and Historiography of

Ideas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1985

Reinhart Koselleck, “Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte”, in Wolfgang Schieder & Volker

Sellin (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland, vol. 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1986

Melvin Richter, “History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory”, Political Theory, vol. 14,

no. 4, 1986, pp. 604-637

Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”,

Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, no. 1, 1987, pp. 143-169

P. & m. Kuntz (eds.), The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years, New York

Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years”, Journal of the

History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 187-205

Gladys Gordon-Bournique, “A.O. Lovejoy and the ‘History of Ideas’”, Journal of the History of

Ideas, 1987, pp. 207-210

7

Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”, Journal of the History of Ideas,

1987, pp. 211-230

Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 231-

245

John E. Toews, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and

the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907

Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation,

Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987

Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”,

in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988

Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”,

Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529

Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988

Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity

Press 1988

James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity

1988

James Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of

Politics”

Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”

Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”

Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action”

Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and

Action”

Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change”

Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers”

Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?”

Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for

Studying”

Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s

Foundations”

Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince”

8

John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”

Charles Taylor, “The Hermeneutics of Conflict”

Quentin Skinner, “A Reply to my Critics”

Reinhart Koselleck, “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, Journal of Modern History,

vol. 61, December 1989, pp. 649-666

Lloyd S. Kramer, “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of

Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra”, in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History,

Berkeley: University of California Press 1989

Quentin Skinner, “Language and Political Change”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L.

Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press 1989

James Farr, “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically” ”, in Terence Ball, James Farr &

Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press 1989

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Critical Theory”, in LaCapra, Soundings in

Critical Theory, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1989

Kack Liveley & Andrew Reeve, “General Introduction”, in Liveley & Reeve (eds.), Modern

Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx. Key Debates, London & New York: Routledge 1989

David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review,

vol. 94, 1989, pp. 581-609

Keith Tribe, “The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Project: From History of Ideas to Conceptual

History. A Review Article”, Comparative Studies in Society, vol. 31, 1989, pp. 180-184

Reinhart Koselleck, ”Social History and Conceptual History”, International Journal of Politics,

Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1990, pp. 308-325

Reinhart Koselleck, “Sprogændring og begivenhedshistorie”, Den jyske historiker, vol. 50,

1990, pp. 121-135

Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette. Reflections on Cultural History, New York & London:

W.W. Norton & Co 1990

Lars-Henrik Schmidt, “Den interpreterende konstruktion”, Den Jyske Historiker, no. 50, 1990,

pp. 55-64

Fritz Ringer, ”The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge”,

Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 269-294

9

Charles Lemert, “The Habits of Intellectuals. Response to Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19,

1990, pp. 295-310

Martin Jay, “Fieldwork and Theorizing in Intellectual History. A Reply to Fritz Ringer”, Theory

& Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 311-321

Fritz Ringer, “Rejoinder to Charles Lemert and Martin Jay”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990,

pp. 323-334

Melvin Richter, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the

Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, 1990, pp. 38-70

Donald R. Kelley, “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?”, Journal of the History of

Ideas, vol. 51, no. 1, 1990, pp. 3-25

Donald R. Kelley, The History of Ideas. Canon and Variations, Rochester: University of

Rochester Press 1900

Donald R. Kelley, “Introduction: Reflections on a Canon”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”

Frederick J. Teggart, “A Problem in the History of Ideas”

Leo Spitzer, “Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Apllied to Hitlerism”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reply to Professor Spitzer”

Theodore Spencer, “Lovejoy’s ‘Essays in the History of Ideas’”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Historiography and Evaluation: A Disclaimer”

Abraham Edel, “Levels of Meaning and the History of Ideas”

Paul O. Kristeller, “The Philosophical Significance of the History of Thought”

Philip P. Wiener, “Logical Significance of the History of Thought”

Joseph Anthony Mazzeo, “Some Interpretations of the History of Ideas”

Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”

Daniel J. Wilson, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Moral of ‘The Great Chain of

Veing’”

Kathleen E. Duffin, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty”

Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s ‘The Great Chain of Being’ after Fifty Years”

Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”

Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”

Johann Huizinga, “History Changing Form”

Joseph Katz, “A Reply to J. Huizinga on the Form and Function of History”

10

Calvin G. Rand, “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey,

Troeltsch, and Meinecke”

Nils B. Kvastad, “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas”

Paul O. Kristeller, “’Creativity’ and ‘Tradition’”

Lester G. Crocker, “Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach”

Patrick H. Hutton, “The Art of Memory Reconceived: From Rhetoric to

Psychoanalysis”

Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect,

Prospect”

Richard Tuck, “History of Political Thought”, in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on

Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press 1991

Henry F. May, “Religion and American Intellectual History, 1945-1989: Reflections on an

Uneasy Relationship”, chap. 1 in May, The Divided Heart. Essays on Protestantism and the

Enlightenment in America, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press

Russel Jacoby, “A New Intellectual History?”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp.

405-424

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Its Ways”, American Historical Review, April

1992, pp. 425-439

Mark Bevir, “The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism”, History and Theory, vol. 31, 1992, pp.

276-98

J.G.A. Pocock, ”A discourse of sovereignty: observations on the work in progress”, in Nicholas

Phillipson & Quentin Skinner, Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (essays in honor of

J.G.A. Pocock), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993

Gerald N. Izenberg, ”Text, Context, and Psychology in Intellectual History”, chap. 3 in Henry

Kozicki (ed.), Developments in Modern Historiography, Houndmills & London: Macmillan

Frans Gregersen & Simo Køppe, “Indledning til idehistorien”, in Gregersen & Køppe,

Idehistorie, vol. 1, Amanda 1994

Robert Mayhew, ”Contextualizing Practice in Intellectual History”, Journal of Historical

Geography, vol. 20, no. 3, 1994, pp. 323-328

Lennart Olausson (ed.), Idéhistoriens egenheter. Teori- och metodproblem inom idéhistorien,

Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1994

Lennart Olausson, ”Från text till text”

11

Bernt Skovdahl, “Idéhistoria och källkritik”

Staffan Carlshamre, ”Sant eller intressant? Filosofi och idéhistoria”

Jonas Anshelm & Martin Kylhammar, ”Om behovet av samverkan mellan

idéhistoria och litteraturvetenskap”

Bosse Holmqvist, ”Om relativism”

Lennart Olausson, ”Kunnskapssociologi och idéhistoria”

Tomas Jonsson, “Et antinomiskt ideologibegrepp”

Knud Haakonssen, “The History of Ideas”, in Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy

from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995

Suzanne Marchand, “Problems and Prospects for Intellectual History”, New German Critique,

vol. 65, 1995, pp. 87-96

Max Edling & Ulf Mörkenstam, “Quentin Skinner: From Historian of Ideas to Political

Scientist”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1995, pp. 119-132

Melvin Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction, New

York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

James D. Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 2:

Aesthetics (part 2: Methodology and Epistemology), London: Penguin 1996

John Dunn, “The History of Political Theory”, chap. 2 in Dunn, The History of Political Theory

and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996

Uffe Østergård & Jan Ifversen (eds.), Begreb og historie, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet 1996

Jan Ifversen, ”Hvordan analysere demokrati i tale?”

Uffe Østergaard & Jan Ifversen, ”Europæisk civilisation, begrebshistorie og

diskursanalyse”

Hartmut Lehmann & Melvin Richter, The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New

Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Washington: German Historical Institute 1996

Melvin Richter, “Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche

Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship

James van Horn Melton, “Otto Brunner and the Ideological Origins of

Begriffsgeschichte”

Donald R. Kelley, “On the Margins of Begriffsgeschichte”

Gabriel Motzkin, “On Koselleck’s Intuition of Time in History”

12

J.G.A. Pocock, “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment

on a Paper by Melvin Richter”

Reinhart Koselleck, “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche

Grundbegriffe”

Reinhart Koselleck, “The Temporalisation of Concepts”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of

Political Thought, 1997, pp. 16-24

William W. Fisher, “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the

Methodologies of Intellectual History”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 49, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1065-

1110

Robert W. T. Martin, “Context and Contradiction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual

Change”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 1997, pp. 413-436

Jay M. Smith, “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early

Modern France”, American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1413-1440

Kari Palonen, ”Quentin Skinner’s Rhetoric of Conceptual Change”, History of the Human

Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 61-80

Kari Palonen, “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself”, Redescriptions, 1997, pp. 39-69

Michael Freeden, “Editorial: Ideologies and conceptual history”, Journal of Political Ideologies,

vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, pp. 3-11

Gad Prudovsky, “Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Copncepts They Had no Linguistic Means

to Express?”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31

Mark Bevir, “Mind and Method in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 2,

1997, pp. 167-189

Roger Chartier, On the Edge of the Cliff. History, Language and Practices, Baltimore &

London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1997

D.R. Woolf, “The Writing of Early Modern European Intellectual History, 1945-1995”, in

Michael Bentley (ed.), Companion to Historiography, London & New York: Routledge 1997

J. Gunnell, “Time and Interpretation: Understanding Concepts and Conceptual Change”,

History of Political Thought, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 641-658

Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree (eds.), History of Concepts –

Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 1998

Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree , ”A Comparative

Perspective on Conceptual History – An Introduction”

13

Pim den Boer, “The Historiography of German Geistesgeschichte and the Dutch

Project of Conceptual History”

Reinhart Koselleck, “Social History and Begriffsgeschichte”

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Speech Acts, Languages or Conceptual History?”

Hans Erich Bödeker, “Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffsgeschichte

Reconsidered”

Maurizio Viroli, “The Origin and the Meaning of the Reason of State”

Terence Ball, “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought”

Bernhard F. Scholz, “Conceptual History in Context: Reconstructing the

Terminology of an Academic Discipline”

Willem Frijhoff, “Conceptual History, Social History and Cultural History: The

test of ‘Cosmopolitism’”

Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, “Conceptual History and Conceptual Transfer: The Case

of ‘Nation’ in Revolutionary France and Germany”

Bram Kempers, “Words, Images and All the Pope’s Men. Raphael’s Stanza della

Segnatura and the Synthesis of Divine Wisdom”

Eddy de Jongh, “Painted Words in Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century”

Rolf Reichardt, “Historical Semantics and Political Iconography: The case of the

Game of the French Revolution (1791/92)”

Martin van Gelderen, “Between Cambridge and Heidelberg: Concepts,

Languages and Images in Intellectual History”

Martin Jay, “European Intellectual History and the Specter of Multiculturalism”, in Jay,

Cultural Semantics. Keywords of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press 1998

Terence Ball, “Political Argument and Conceptual Change”, in Ball, Transforming Political

Discourse. Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1998

Jerry Z. Muller, “Begriffsgeschichte: Origins and Prospects”, History of European Ideas, vol.

25, 1999, pp. 3-7

Hayden White, “Literary Theory and Historical Writing”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in

the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth in Historical Representation”,

in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins


14

Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation”, in White,

Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University

Press 1999

Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

James Schmidt, “How Historical is Begriffsgeschichte?”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25,

1999, pp. 9-14

Janet Coleman, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 28-

40

Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Theses on

Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 41-59

Quentin Skinner, “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 60-73

David Armitage, “Answering the Call: The History of Political and Social Concepts in English”,

History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 15-22

Daniel Gordon, “Modernity and its Discontents: Some Critical Thoughts on Conceptual

History”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 23-29

Melvin Richter, “Reply to Comments”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 31-37

P.J. Kelly, “Contextual and Non-Contextual Histories of Political Thought”, in Jack Hayward,

Brian Barry & Archie Brown (eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century,

Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999

Nils Andersson & Henrik Björck (eds.), Vad är idéhistoria? Perspektiv på ämnets identitet

under sextio år, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1999

Siep Stuurman, ”The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed

Alternative”, History and Theory, vol. 39, 2000, pp. 147-166

Mark Bevir, “The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp.

295-300

Kari Palonen, “Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark

Bevir”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 301-310

Siep Stuurman, “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas”,

Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 311-319

F.R. Ankersmit, “Comments on Bevir’s The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History,

vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 321-331

15

Allan Megill, “Imagining the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333-

340

Mark Bevir, “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics”, Rethinking History, vol.

4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 341-350

Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit, “Exchanging Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000,

pp. 351-372

Mark Bevir, “Begriffsgeschichte”, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2, 2000, pp. 273-284

Erland Mårald, “Idéhistoria ur ett världshistoriskt perspektiv”, i Mohammad Fazlhashemi,

Anders Öckerman & Ronny Ambjörnsson (eds.), Vidgade vyer. Globalt perspektiv på

idéhistoria, Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000

Mark Bevir, “The Text as a Historical Object”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political

Thought, 2000, pp. 201-222

Timothy Bahti, “Literary Criticism and the History of Ideas”, in Christa Knellwolf &

Christopher Norris (eds.), Literary Criticism, vol. 9, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

2001

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 33, 2001: Quentin Skinner og intellektuel historie

Tore Eriksen & Peter C. Kjærgaard, ”Quentin Skinner – fra idéhistorie til

intellektuel historie”

Quentin Skinner, ”Moralske principper og social forandring”

Anthony Pagden, ”Intellektuel historie”

Tore Frängsmyr, ”Idéhistorie eller idéernes funktion i historien”

Thomas Krogh, ”Quentin Skinner og problemer i at skrive den politiske

tænknings historie”

Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Intellektuel historie som genre og disciplin”

Victoria Höög, ”Historiens tvetydighed: Quentin Skinner og problematiseringen

af traditionen”

Duncan Forbes, “Aesthetic thoughts on doing the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas,

vol. 27, 2001, pp. 101-113

Peter J. Boettke, “F.A. Hayek as an intellectual historian of economics”, chap. 7 in Steven G.

Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London

& New York: Routledge 2001

16

Geoffrey Gilbert, “Donald Winch as intellectual historian”, chap. 18 in Steven G. Medema &

Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New

York: Routledge 2001

Duncan Bell, “The Cambridge School and world politics: critical theory, history and conceptual

change”, 2001, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk

Eckhart Hellmuth & Christoph von Ehrenstein, “Intellectual History Made in Britain: Die

Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 149-172

Daniel Wickberg, “Intellectual History vs. the Social History of Intellectuals”, Rethinking

History, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 383-395

Dominick LaCapra, Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins


David Runciman, “History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline”, British Journal of

Politics and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 84-104

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought”,

in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National

Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Melvin Richter, “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the

History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte)”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain

Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge


Quentin Skinner, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to

the History of Political Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of

Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Donald R. Kelley, “Eclecticism and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.

62, no. 4, 2001, pp. 577-592

F. Oz-Salzberger, “Intellectual History”, in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), International Encyclopedia of

the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam & New York: Elsevier 2001, pp. 7605-7612

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Redaktørenes forord”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),

Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 1, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Tusen års tankeliv”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.),

Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 6, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

17

Jason David BeDuhn, “The historical assessment of speech acts: clarification of Austin and

Skinner for the study of religions”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 14, 2002,

pp. 84-113

Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas. The History of Intellectual History, Aldershot: Ashgate

2002

History of European Ideas, vol. 28, no 1-2, 2002: Mark Bevir and the Logic of the History of

Ideas: A Symposium

o Robert Stern, “History, meaning and interpretation: a critical response to Bevir”, pp. 1-

12

o Hugh Rayment-Pickard, “Derrida and fidelity to history”, pp. 13-20

o James Martin, “The political logic of discourse: a neo-Gramscian view”, pp. 21-31

o Melissa Lane, “Why the History of Ideas at all?”, pp. 33-41

o Alun Munslow, “Objectivity and the writing of history”, pp. 43-50

o R.M. Burns, “Language, tradition, and self in the generation of meaning”, pp. 51-75

o Jane Garnett, “Whose logic? Reflections on gender in the history of ideas”, pp. 77-82

o Mark Bevir, “Clarifications”, pp. 83-100

o Brian Yong, “The tyranny of the definite article: Some thoughts on the art of intellectual

history”, 101-117

Reinhart Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing Concepts,

Stanford: Stanford University Press 2002

Peter Burke, “Context in Context”, Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, 2002, pp. 152-177

Kari Palonen, “The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing. Quentin Skinner's

and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory”, European Journal of

Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 2002, pp. 91-106

Sandro Chignola, “History of political thought and the history of political concepts: Koselleck's

proposal and Italian research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517-541

Petri Koikkalainen & Sami Syrjämäki, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past”,

Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, no. 6, 2002, pp. 34-63

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History and Cultural History: The Inside and the Outside”,

History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2002, pp. 1-19

Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge


18

Hans Erich Bödeker (ed.), Begriffgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte,

Göttingen: Wallstein 2002

Hans Erich Bödeker, “Ausprägungen der historischen Semantik in den

historiscen Kulturwissenschaften”

Reinhart Koselleck, “Hinweise auf die temporalen Strukturen

begriffsgeschichtlichen Wandels”

Ulrich Ricken, “Zum Verhältnis vergleichender Begriffsgeschichte und

vergleichender Lexikologie”

Hans Erich Bödeker, ”Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode”

Jacques Guilhaumou, “L’historie linguistique des usages conceptuels à l’épreuve

des événements linguistiques”

Mark Bevir, “The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation”

Rüdiger Zill, “Substrukturen des Denkens. Grenzen und Perspektiven einer

Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg”

Lutz Danneberg: ”Sinn und Unsinn einer Metapherngeschichte”

Richard Macksey, “The History of Ideas at 80”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 117, no. 5, 2002,

pp. 1083-1097

Annabel Brett, “What is Intellectual History Now?”, in David Cannadine (ed.), What is History

Now?, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan 2002

Duncan S.A. Bell, “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique”, Alternatives, vol. 27,

2002, pp. 327-350

Jan Ifversen, “Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis”, Kontur, no. 7, 2003,

pp. 60-69

Jussi Kurunmäki & Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Time, History and

Politics. Zum achtzigsten Geburtstag von Reinhart Koselleck, Jyväskylä: University of

Jyväskylä Press 2003

o Wolf-Dieter Narr und Kari Palonen, ”Zeit, Zeitlichkeit und Geschichte – sperrige

Reflexionen. Reinhart Koselleck im Gespräch”

o Patricia Springborg, ”What can we say about history? Modernity and historical

consciousness”

o Björn Wittrock, “Cultural crystallisation and conceptual change. Modernity, axiality and

meaning in history”

19

Melvin Richter, ”Toward a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison

of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’”, Critical Review of International Social and

Political Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 91-120

Herfried Münkler, “Politische Ideengeschichte”, in Münkler (ed.), Politikwissenschaft. Ein

Grundkurs, Hamburg: Rohwolt 2003

Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner – History, Politics, Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press 2003

David Boucher & Paul Kelly, “Introduction”, in Boucher & Kelly (eds.), Political Thinkers

from Socrates to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003

Jan Ifversen, “Om den tyske begrebshistorie”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 18-34

Per Mouritsen, ”Hvorfor idéhistorie – og hvordan?”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 8-17

Trond Berg Eriksen, Hva er Idéhistorie, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 2003

Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen (eds.), Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra? Tematiske og

teoretiske brytninger i idéhistoriefaget, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget 2003

Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen:,“Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra”

Dorthe Jørgensen, ”Hvad er idéhistorie?”

Trond Berg Eriksen, ”Hvad kan idéhistorikere si om Norge?”

Nils Gilje, ”Idéhistorie og folkekultur i den tidlig moderne perioden”

Knut Ove Eliassen, ”En lav opplysning?”

Sverre Bagge, ”Fra jordlapp og pengestykke til mentalitet og diskurs. Historiens

forhold til idéhistorien”

Victoria Höög, ”Idéhistoria och den klassiska bildungstraditionen. Refleksioner

över humanioras framtid i det senmoderna samhället”

Sven Arntzen, ”Arthur O. Lovejoy og idéhistorien”

Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Studiet av idéhistorien”

Alan Finlayson, “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric”, Economy and Society, vol. 33,

no. 4, 2004, pp. 528-549

“Editorial”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-2

Kjetil Jakobsen, “Intellektuel historie og de intellektuelles historie”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 15-25

Thomas Krogh, ”Idéhistorien og andre historier”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 27-33

H.O. Christophersen, ”Noen bemerkninger om idéhistoriens innhold og metode”, ARR, no. 4,

2004, pp. 39-45

20

Ingrid Markussen, ”På sporet af ideer”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 83-91

Lloyd Kramer, “Intellectual History and Philosophy”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1,

2004, pp. 81-95

Carolyn Dean, “Intellectual History and the Prominence of Things that Matter”, Rethinking

History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp. 537-547

Elizabeth A. Clark, “The New Intellectual History” + “Texts and Contexts, chaps. 6-7 in Clark,

History, Theory, Text. Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, Mass. & London:

Harvard University Press 2004

Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, New York: Columbia University Press 2004

Sverker Sörlin, “Världens ordning”, in Sörlin, Världens ordning. Europas idéhistoria 1492-

1918, Stockholm: Natur och Kultur 2004

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History in a Global Age”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,

pp. 155-167

Allan Megill, ”Globalization and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005,

pp. 179-187

Joseph M. Levine, “Intellectual History as History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, pp.

189-200

Allan Megill, “Intellectual History and History”, Rethinking History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp.

549-557

Rafael Major, ”The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American

Political Science”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, 2005, pp. 477-485

Niklas Olsen, “Historien om de historiske grundbegreber”, www.historie-nu.dk, August 2005

Jeppe Nevers, Kildekritikkens begrebshistorie. En undersøgelse af historiefagets metodelære,

Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag 2005

Renée Jeffery, “Tradition as Invention: the ‘traditions tradition’ and the history of ideas in

international relations”, Millennium, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 57-84

Kari Palonen, ”The Politics of Conceptual History”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 37-

50

Andreas Schinkel, “Imagination as a Category of History: An Essay concerning Koselleck’s

Concepts of Erfahrungsraum and Erwartungshorizont”, History and Theory, vol. 44, 2005, pp.

42-54

21

Richard Macksey, “History of Ideas”, in Michael Groden, Martin Kreiswirth & Imre Szeman

(eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, 2. ed., Baltimore & London:

Johns Hopkins University Press 2005

Melvin Richter, “More than a Two-Way Traffic: Analyzing, Translating, and Comparing

Political Concepts from Other Cultures”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 7-20

Robert Darnton, “Discourse and Diffusion”, Contributions, vol. 1, no. 1, 2005, pp. 21-28

Quentin Skinner, “On Intellectual History and the History of Books”, Contributions, vol. 1, no.

1, 2005, pp. 29-36

Martin J. Burke, “Conceptual History in the United States: A Missing “National Project””,

Contributions, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005, pp. 127-144

Sandro Chignola, “Redescribing Political Concepts: History of Concepts and Politics”,


Maryanne Cline Horowitz, “Preface”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of Ideas,

New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005

Donald R. Kelley, “Ideas, History of”, in Horowitz (ed.), New Dictionary of the History of

Ideas, vol. 3, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons 2005

Reinhart Koselleck, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen

und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2006

Pasi Ihalainen, ”Between historical semantics and pragmatics: Reconstructing past political

thought through conceptual history”, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2006, pp.

115-143

J.G.A. Pocock, “Theory in History: Problems of Context and Narrative”, in John S. Dryzek,

Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford


James Farr, “The History of Political Thought as Disciplinary Genre”, in John S. Dryzek,

Bonnie Honig & Anne Phillips (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford


Annabel Brett & James Tully (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006

Mark Goldie, “The Context of The Foundations”

Holly Hamilton-Bleakley, “Linguistic Philosophy and The Foundations”

J.G.A. Pocock, “Foundations and Moments”

22

Marco Geuna, “Skinner, Pre-Humanist Rhetorical Culture and Machiavelli”

Warren Boutcher, “Unoriginal Authors: How to Do Things with Texts in the

Renaissance”

Cathy Curtis, “’The Best State of the Commonwealth’: Thomas More and

Quentin Skinner”

H.M. Höpfl, “Scholasticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”

Annabel Brett, “Scholastic Political Thought and the Modern Concept of the

State”

Martin van Gelderen, “’So merely humane’: Theories of Resistance in Early-

Modern Europe”

Richard Tuck, “Hobbes and Democracy”

Kinch Hoekstra, “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy”

David Armitage, “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International

Thought”

Quentin Skinner, “Surveying The Foundations: A Retrospect and Reassessment”

Jonathan Israel, ”Historians and the Writing of ‘Intellectual History’”, in Israel, Enlightenment

Contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752, Cambridge:


Richard Whatmore & Brian Yong (eds.), Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History,

Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2006

John W. Burrow, “Intellectual History in English Academic Life”

Brian Young, “Intellectual History in Britain”

Abigail Williams, “Literary and Intellectual History”

Lucy Hartley, “Intellectual History and the History of Art”

Mishtooni Bose, “The Intellectual History of the Middle Ages”

Richard Whatmore, “Intellectual History and the History of Political Thought”

James Livesey, “Intellectual History and the History of Science”

Deborah Madden, “Medicine, Science and Intellectual History”

Brian Cowan, “Intellectual, Social and Cultural History: Ideas in Context”

Rachel Foxley, “Gender and Intellectual History”

Duncan Kelly, “The Politics of Intellectual History in Twentieth-Century

Europe”

23

Terence Ball, “Must Political Theory Be Historical?”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 7-

18

Bo Stråth, “Ideology and History”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006, pp. 23-

42

Rudolf Valkhoff, ”Some Similarities between Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Discourse”,


Javier Fernández Sebastián & Juan Francisco Fuentes, “Conceptual History, Memory and

Identity: An Interview with Reinhart Koselleck”, Contributions, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 99-127

Robert Burns (red.), Historiography. Critical Concepts in Historical Studies, vol. 3: Ideas,

London & New York: Routledge 2006

Stefano Collini et. al., “What is Intellectual History?”

Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the

History of Philosophy”

Ben Rogers, “Review Article: Philosophy for Historians: The Methodological

Writings of Quentin Skinner”

Melvin Richter, “Begriffsgeschichte and the History of Ideas”

David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”

Joyce Appleby, “One Good Turn Deserves Another: Moving Beyond the

Linguistic: A Response to David Harlan”

Fritz Ringer, “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of

Knowledge”

Robert M. Burns, “Language, Tradition, and the Self in the Generation of

Meaning”

Donald R. Kelley, Frontiers of History. Historical Inquiry in the Twentieth Century, New

Haven & London: Yale University Press 2006

Emma Rotschild, “Arc of Ideas. International History and Intellectual History”, in Gunilla

Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (eds.), Transnationale Geschichte. Themen, Tendenzen

und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2006

J.G.A. Pocock, Gordon Schochet & Lois G. Schwoerer, “The History of British Political

Thought: A Field and its Futures”, in David Armitage (ed.), British Political Thought in

History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006

24

Richard E. Flathman, “Here and Now, There and Then, Always and Everywhere: Reflections

Concerning Political Theory and the Study/Writing of Political Thought”, in David Armitage

(ed.), British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, 1500-1800, Cambridge:


Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 47, 2006: Hans Blumenberg

Hans Blumenberg: ”En antropologisk tilnærmelse til retorikkens aktualitet”

Odo Marquard, ”Aflastning fra det absolutte – In memorian”

Manfred Sommer, ”Beskrivelse af mennesket – Interview med Manfred

Sommer”

Kasper Lysemose, ”Balancen mellem Husserl og Heidegger – den tidlige

Blumenbergs iagttagelser af fænomenologien”

Ulrik Houlind Rasmussen, ”Metaforiseret kosmologi – eller hvordan Kopernikus

stillede et metaforisk potentiale til rådighed for det moderne menneskes

selvforståelse”

Frank Beck Lassen, ”Hvad var det vi ville vide? – Hans Blumenbergs

metaforologi som læsestrategi”

Anthony Grafton, “The History of Ideas: Precepts and Practice, 1950-200 and Beyond”, Journal

of the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 1-32

John Patrick Diggins, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History”, Journal of

the History of Ideas, 2006, pp. 181-208

Robert Darnton, “’What is the History of Books’ Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.

4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 495-508

Jason Edwards, “The Ideological Interpellation of Individuals as Combatants: An Encounter

Between Reinhart Koselleck and Michel Foucault”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 12, no.

1, 2007, pp. 49-66

Peter Thiergen, “Probleme russischer Begriffsgeschichte”, Studia Slavica, vol. 52, no. 1-2,

2007, pp. 403-412

Emmanuelle Tricoire & Jacques Lévy, “Interview with Quentin Skinner: Concepts only have

histories”, 2007, www.espacestemps.net/document3692.html

Allan Megill, Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice,

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007

25

Roger Chartier, “The Order of Books Revisited”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 4, no. 3,

2007, pp. 509-519

David D. Hall, “What was the History of Book? A Response”, Modern Intellectual History, vol.

4, no. 3, 2007, pp. 537-544

Jotham Parsons, “Defining the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 68, no. 4,

2007, pp. 683-699

Branko Mitrovic, “Intellectual History, Inconceivability, and Methodological Holism”, History

and Theory, vol. 46, 2007, pp. 29-47

Terence Ball, “Professor Skinner’s Visions”, Political Studies Review, vol. 5, 2007, pp. 351-364

Victoria Fareld, “Contexts in Flux: Textual Concerns for the Historian of Ideas”, Ideas in

History, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 48, 2007: Begrebshistorie

Reinhart Koselleck, ”Dannelsens antropologiske og semantiske struktur”

Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht, ”Åndens pyramider – om den begrebshistoriske

bevægelses hastige fremkomst, dens usynlige dimensioner og pludselige aftagen”

Jan Ifversen, ”Begrebshistorien efter Reinhart Koselleck”

Niklas Olsen, ”En partisan i kamp for historier i flertal – Reinhart Kosellecks

alternativ til historiefilosofien”

Jeppe Nevers, ”Spørgsmålets politik – Kari Palonen og den nyere

begrebshistorie”

Frank Beck Lassen, ”Tyveri! – til sekulariseringens semantik”

Stine Grumsen & Hans Henrik Hjermitslev, ”Institut for Idéhistorie 1967-2004. Et studie af

institutionens oprettelse, udvikling og afvikling”, Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 50,

2007, pp. 96-124

Jens Busck, Jeppe Nevers & Niklas Olsen (eds.), Reinhart Koselleck: Begreber, tid og erfaring,

København: Hans Reitzel 2007

Javier Fernández Sebastián, ”Intellectual History, Liberty and Republicanism: An Interview

with Quentin Skinner”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, vol. 3, 2007, pp. 103-123

Emile Perreau-Saussine, “Quentin Skinner in Context”, Review of Politics, vol. 69, 2007, pp.

106-122

26

John E. Toews, “Integrating Music Into Intellectual History: Nineteenth-Century Art Music as a

Discourse of Agency and Identity”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008, pp. 309-

331

Stefan Collini: “Intellectual History”, 2008,

www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/articles/intellectual_history.html

Andrew Sartori, Bengal in Global Concept History, Chicago & London: University of Chicago

Press, chap. 1

Mark Bevir, “What is Genealogy?”, vol. 2, 2008, pp. 263-275

Ryan Walter, “Reconciling Foucault and Skinner on the State: The Primacy of Politics?”,

History of the Human Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, 2008, pp. 94-114

John Pocock, “Historiography and Political Thought”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp.

81-100

Kari Palonen, “John Pocock and Quentin Skinner. The Machiavellian and the Weberian

Moment”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 61-79

Thomas Krogh, “Time in History and in Politics – a Prominent Theme in the Works of John

Pocock”, Ideas in History, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 33-59

Danny Millum: “Making History Interview with Quentin Skinner”, April 2008,

http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/resources/interviews/Skinner_Quentin.html

Laszlo Kontler, “Translation and Comparison II: A Methodological Inquiry into Reception in

the History of Ideas”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 27-56

João Feres, “Taking Text Seriously: Remarks on the Methodology of the History of Political

Thought”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 57-80

Luca Scuccimarra, “Semantics of Time and Historical Experience: Remarks on Koselleck’s

Historik”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 160-175

Vicente Oieni & João Feres, “Conceptual History and Translation: An Interview with Melvin

Richter”, Contributions, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008, pp. 226-238

Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, “Making Sense of Conceptual Change”, History and Theory, vol. 47,

2008, pp. 351-372

Niklas Luhmann, “Ideengeschichte in soziologischer Perspektive”, in Luhmann, Ideenevolution,

Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2008 [1981]

27

Pasi Ihalainen & Kari Palonen, “Parliamentary Sources in the Comparative Study of Conceptual

History: Methodological Aspects and Illustrations of a Research Proposal”, Parliaments, Estates

& Representation, vol. 29, 2009, pp. 17-34

Dominick LaCapra, “Articulating Intellectual History, Cultural History, and Critical Theory”, in

LaCapra, History and its Limits. Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell


Dominick LaCapra, “Tropisms of Intellectual History”, in LaCapra, History and its Limits.

Human, Animal, Violence, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 2009

Colin Tyler, “Performativity and the Intellectual Historian’s Re-Enactment of Written Words”,

Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 167-186

Jan-Werner Müller, “The triumph of what (if anything)? Rethinking political ideologies and

political institutions in twentieth-century Europe”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 14, no. 2,

2009, pp. 211-226

Donald Winch, “Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Personal View”,

History of Economics Review, 2009, pp. 1-16

Chris Goto-Jones, “The Kyoto School, the Cambridge School, and the History of Political

Philosophy in Wartime Japan”, Positions, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009, pp. 13-42

Toby Reiner, “Texts as Performances: How to Reconstruct Webs of Beliefs from Expressed

Utterances”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 266-289

J.G.A. Pocock, Political Thought and History. Essays on Theory and Method, Cambridge:


A.P. Martinich, “Four Senses of ‘Meaning’ in the History of Ideas: Quentin Skinner’s Theory of

Historical Interpretation”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 225-245

Robert Lamb, “Recent Developments in the Thought of Quentin Skinner and the Ambitions of

Contextualism”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 246-265

Mark Bevir, “Contextualism: From Modernist Method to Post-Analytic Historicism”, Journal of

the Philosophy of History, vol. 3, 2009, pp. 211-224

Alexander Gallus, “’Intellectual History’ mit Intellektuellen und ohne sie. Facetten neuerer

geistesgeschichtliche Forschung”, Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 288, no. 1, 2009, pp. 139-150

Richard Fisher, “How to Do Things with Books: Quentin Skinner and the Dissemination of

Ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 276-280

28

Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen (eds.), Quentin Skinner: Politik og Historie, København:

Hans Reitzel 2009

Markku Hyrkkänen, “All History Is, More or Less, Intellectual History: R.G. Collingwood’s

Contribution to the Theory and Methodology of Intellectual History”, Intellectual History

Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 2009, pp. 251-263

Sonja Asal, Frank Druffner & Valentin Groebner, ”Wie frei sind wir wirklich? Fragen an

Quentin Skinner”, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 2, 2009, pp. 5-21

William Walker, “J.G.A. Pocock and the History of British Political Thought: Assessing the

State of the Art”, Eighteenth-Century Life, vol. 33, no. 1, 2009, pp. 83-96

Robert Lamb, “Quentin Skinner’s Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique”, History of the

Human Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, 2009, pp. 51-73

Hubert Locher, “Denken in Bildern. Reinhart Kosellecks Program Zur politischen Ikonologie”,

Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, no. 4, 2009, pp. 81-96

Elías José Palti, “From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual

History and the Complex Fabric of Language”, History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 194-211

Stefan-Ludwig Hoffmann, “Koselleck, Arendt, and the Anthropology of Historical Experience”,

History and Theory, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 212-236

Sudipta Kaviraj, ”Said and the History of Ideas”, in Sugata Bose & Kris Manjapra (eds.),

Cosmopolitan Thought Zones, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan 2010

Mikkel Thorup & Frank Beck Lassen, “Tekstfortolkeren. Interview med Quentin Skinner”,

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 57, 2010, pp. 171-189

David A. Hollinger, “American Intellectual History, 1907-2007”, in James M. Banner (ed.), A

Century of American Historiography, Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s 2010

J.G.A. Pocock, “Historiography as a Form of Political Thought”, History of European Ideas,

vol. 37, 2010, pp. 1-6

Riccardo Bavaj, “Intellectual History”, 2010, http://docupedia.de/zg/Intellectual_History

Pierre Force, “The Teeth of Time: Pierre Hadot on Meaning and Misunderstanding in the

History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 20-40

Roger Chartier, “History, Time, and Space”, Republics of Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011, pp.1-13

Jan-Werner Müller, “European Intellectual History as Contemporary History”, Journal of

Contemporary History, vol. 46, no. 3, 2011, pp. 574-590

29

Martin Saar, “Relocating the Modern State: Governmentality and the History of Ideas”, in

Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann & Thomas Lemke (eds.), Governmentality. Current Issues

and Future Challenges, London & New York: Routledge 2011

Naja Vucina, Claus Drejer & Peter Triantafillou, “Histories and freedom of the present:

Foucault and Skinner”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, 2011, pp. 124-141

Martin Jay, “Historical Explanation and the Event: Reflections on the Limits of

Contextualization”, New Literary History, vol. 42, 2011, pp. 557-571

Allan Megill, “Five Questions on Intellectual History”, Rethinking History, vol. 15, no. 14,

2011, pp. 489-510

Reinhart Koselleck, “Introduction and Prefaces to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”,


Nikolay Koposov, “Collective Singulars. A Reinterpretation”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1, 2011,

pp- 39-64

Jan Ifversen, “About Key Concepts and How to Study Them”, Contributions, vol. 6, no. 1,

2011, pp. 65-88

“The European Conceptual History Project (ECHP): Mission Statement”, Contributions, vol. 6,

no. 1, 2011, pp. 111-116

Peter Ghosh, “Hugh Trevor-Roper and the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 37,

2011, pp. 483-505

Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Meaning and Method”, The Art of Theory, 2011,

http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-on-meaning-and-method/

Teresa Bejan, “Interview: Quentin Skinner in Context”, The Art of Theory, 2011,

http://www.artoftheory.com/quentin-skinner-in-context/

Symposium on Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics, , Journal of the History of Ideas, vol.

73, no. 1, 2012

o Melissa Lane, “Doing Our Own Thinking for Ourselves: On Quentin Skinner’s

Genealogical Turn”

o Bryan Garsten, “Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics”

o Nadia Urbinati, “Republicanism after the French Revolution: The Case of Sismonde

Sismondi”

o Philip Petitt, “Freedom in Hobbes’s Ontology and Semantics: A Comment on Quentin

Skinner”

30

o Quentin Skinner, “On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My

Critics”

Forum on the Present and Future of American Intellectual History, Modern Intellectual History,

vol. 9, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-248

o Thomas Bender: “Forum: the Present and Future of American Intellectual History,

Introduction”

o Leslie Butler: “From the History of Ideas to Ideas in History”

o David A. Hall: “Backwards to the Future: the Cultural Turn and the Wisdom of

Intellectual History”

o David A. Hollinger: “What is Our ‘Canon’? How American Intellectual Historians

Debate the Core of their Field”

o James T. Kloppenberg: “Thinking Historically: A Manifesto of Pragmatic

Hermeneutics”

o Joan Shelley Rubin: “Nixon’s Grin and other Keys to the Future of Cultural and

Intellectual History”

o Jeffrey Sklansky: “The Elusive Sovereign: New Intellectual and Social Histories of

Capitalism”

Jeffrey Edward Green, “On the Difference Between a Pupil and a Historian of Ideas”, Journal

of the Philosophy of History, vol. 6, 2012, pp. 84-110

Margrit Pernau, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories”,


Myoung-Kyu Park, “Conceptual History in Korea: Its Developments and Prospects”,


David Armitage, ”What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée”, History of

European Ideas, vol. 38, no. 4, 2012, pp. 493-507

Mikkel Thorup: ”Intellektuel historie”, Temp, no. 4, 2012, pp. 177-189

“Symposium: Assessing and Extending The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the

History of Ideas, vol. 73, no. 4, 2012

o Daniel I. O’Neill, “Revisiting the Middle Way: The Logic of the History of Ideas after

More Than a Decade”

o Martyn P. Thompson, “The Logic of the History of Ideas: Mark Bevir and Michael

Oakeshott”

31

o A. P. Martinich, “A Moderate Logic of the History of Ideas”

o Sara R. Jordan & Cary J. Nederman, ” The Logic of the History of Ideas and the Study of

Comparative Political Theory”

o Amit Ron, “The Logic of the Historian and the Logic of the Citizen”

o Mark Bevir, “Post-Analytic Historicism”

Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Hvorfor er idéhistorie vigtig?”, November 2012,

http://baggrund.com/hvorfor-er-idehistorie-vigtig/

Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”,. November 2012,

http://baggrund.com/afselvfolgeliggorelse-idehistoriens-raison-detre/

Mikkel Thorup, ”Intellektuel historie – idéhistorien i dag”, November 2012,

http://baggrund.com/intellektuel-historie-idehistorien-i-dag/

Christopher Fear, ”The question-and-answer logic of historical context”, History of the Human

Sciences, vol. 26, no. 3, 2013, pp. 68-81

Stefanie Gänger & Su Lin Lewis, “Forum: a world of ideas: new pathways in global intellectual

history, c. 1880-1930”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, pp. 347-351

Mikkel Thorup, Morten Haugaard Jeppesen & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Intellectual History. 5

Questions, Copenhagen: Automatic Press 2013

Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori (eds.), Global Intellectual History, New York: Columbia


o Samuel Moyn & Andrew Sartori, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History”

o Siep Stuurman, “Common Humanity and Cultural Difference on the Sedentary –

Nomadic Frontier: Herodotus, Sima Qian, and Ibn Khaldun”

o Sheldon Pollock, “Cosmopolitanism, Vernacularism, and Premodernity”

o Vanessa Smith, “Joseph Bank’s Intermediaries: Rethinking Global Cultural Exchange”

o Andrew Sartori, “Global Intellectual History and the History of Political Economy”

o Christopher L. Hill, “Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth

Century”

o Cemil Aydin, “Globalizing the Intellectual History of the Idea of the ‘Muslim World’”

o Samuel Moyn, “On the Nonglobalization of Ideas”

32

o Mamadou Diouf & Jinny Prais, “’Casting the Badge of Inferiority Beneath Black

Peoples’ Feet’: Archiving and Reading the African Past, Present, and Future in World

History

o Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place”

o Duncan Bell, “Making and Taking Worlds”

o Frederick Cooper, “How Global Do We Want Our Intellectual History to Be?”

o Sudipta Kaviraj, “Global Intellectual History: Meanings and Methods”

David Armitage, “The international turn in intellectual history”, chap. 1 in Foundations of

modern international thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013

Allan Megill and Xupeng Zhang, “Questions on the history of ideas and its neighbours”

Rethinking History, 2013, pp. 1-21

Brian Kjær Olesen, Jonas Gerlings, Kaarlo Havu, Daniel Knegt, Matti La Mela & Thomas Ø.

Wittendorff, “Doing things with intellectual history: Interview with Martin van Gelderen”,

Zeitenblicke, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, www.zeitenblicke.de/2013/1/Gelderen

Slagmark, no. 67, 2013: Ny idéhistorie

o Frank Beck Lassen, “Afselvfølgeliggørelse – idéhistoriens raison d’etre”

o Roger Chartier, ”Historien – eller om at læse tiden”

o David Dunér, ”Den kognitiva vändningen”

o Mikkel Thorup, ”Taget ud af sammenhæng – om kontekst i idéhistorie”

o Mark Bevir, ”Kontekstualisme – fra modernistisk metode til post-analytisk

historicisme?”

o David Armitage, ”Hvad er den store idé? – intellektuel historie og longue durée”

33

pure.au.dkpure.au.dk/portal/files/67811070/Bibliography_on... · Web viewNatural Law and Moral...

Documents

Transcript of pure.au.dkpure.au.dk/portal/files/67811070/Bibliography_on... · Web viewNatural Law and Moral...