Pure Competition
-
Upload
nell-banks -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Pure Competition
Pure Competiti
onBy:
Catherine Castañeda & Ana Logan
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Pure Competition
Monopolistic Competition
Oligopoly
Pure Monopoly
FOUR MARKET MODELS
Pure Competition:
• Very Large Numbers• Standardized Product• “Price Takers”• Free Entry and Exit
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
Perfectly Elastic DemandPrice Taker Role
Total RevenueAverage RevenueMarginal Revenue
$131 0 $ 0
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
$131 131
0 1
$ 0131
$131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]
$131 131131
0 1 2
$ 0131262
$131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]
$131 131131131
0 1 23
$ 0131262393
$131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]
$131 131131131131
0 1 234
$ 0131262393524
$131131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]]
$131 131131131131131131131131131131
0 1 23456789
10
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
$131
131131131131131131131131131
Product Price (P)(Average Revenue)
TotalRevenue (TR)
P x Q
MarginalRevenue (MR)
▲TR
QuantityDemanded (Q)
DEMAND AS SEEN BY APURELY COMPETITIVE SELLER
]]]]]]]]]]
DEMAND, MARGINAL REVENUE, AND TOTALREVENUE IN PURE COMPETITION
TR
D = MR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1179
1048
917
786
655
524
393
262
131
0
Pri
ce
an
d r
ev
enu
e
Quantity Demanded (sold)
SHORT-RUN PROFIT MAXIMIZATIONTwo Approaches
First:Total-Revenue -Total Cost Approach
The Decision Rule:Produce in the short-run if it can realize
1- A profit (or)2- A loss less than its fixed costs
The Decision Process:Should the firm produce?What quantity should be produced?What profit or loss will be realized?
TotalCost
TFC+TVC
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
TotalFixedCost
TotalVariable
CostTotal
RevenueProfitTR-TC
$ 100 100 100100100100100100100100100
$ 090
170240300370450540650780930
$ 100190270340400470550640750880
1030
Price: $131
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 298+ 299+ 280
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
TotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
TotalFixedCost
TotalVariable
CostTotal
RevenueProfitTR-TC
$ 100 100 100100100100100100100100100
$ 090
170240300370450540650780930
$ 100190270340400470550640750880
1030
Price: $131
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 298+ 299+ 280
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
$ 0131262393524655786917
104811791310
$1,8001,7001,6001,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
To
tal r
eve
nu
e a
nd
to
tal c
ost
TotalRevenue
TotalCost
MaximumEconomic
Profits$299
Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)
Break-Even Point(Normal Profit)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TOTAL REVENUE-TOTAL COST APPROACH
SHORT-RUN PROFIT MAXIMIZATIONTwo Approaches
Three Characteristics of MR=MC Rule:• The rule applies only if producing
is preferred to shutting down• Rule applies to all markets• Rule can be restated P=MC
Second:Marginal-Revenue -Marginal Cost
Approach
MR = MC Rule
AverageTotalCost
0 1 23456789
10
TotalProduct
AverageFixedCost
AverageVariable
Cost
Price =MarginalRevenue
TotalEconomicProfit/Loss
$100.00
50.00 33.3325.0020.0016.6714.2912.5011.1110.00
$90.0085.0080.0075.0074.0075.0077.1481.2586.6793.00
$190.00135.00113.33100.00
94.0091.6791.4393.7597.78
103.00
- $100- 59
- 8+ 53
+ 124+ 185+ 236+ 277+ 298+ 299+ 280
MARGINAL REVENUE-MARGINAL COST APPROACH
$ 131131131131131131131131131131
MarginalCost
90807060708090
110130150
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MR
AVCATC
Economic Profit
$131.00
$97.78
MR-MC APPROACH
Profit Maximization Position
the MR=MC rule still applies
If the price is lowered from $131 to $81…
…but the MR = MC point changes.
Loss Minimization PositionMR-MC APPROACH
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MRAVCATC
Economic Loss
$81.00$91.67
Loss Minimization Position
MR-MC APPROACH
$200
150
100
50
0
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MC
MR
AVCATC
$71.00
Short-Run Shut Down Point
Minimum AVCis the Shut-Down
Point
MR-MC APPROACH
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
PriceQuantitySupplied
Maximum Profit (+)Or Minimum Loss (-)
Observe the impact upon profitability as price is changed…
$151 131 111 91 81 71 61
10987600
$+480+299
+138 -3
-64 -100 -100
MR-MC APPROACH
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s) MC
MR1
AVC
ATC
Quantity Supplied
MR2
MR3
MR4
MR5
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
Do notProduce –
Below AVC
Break-even(Normal Profit)Point
MR-MC APPROACH
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s)
MC
MR1
Quantity Supplied
MR2
MR3
MR4
MR5
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Marginal Cost & Short-Run SupplyYields theShort-Run
Supply Curve
Supply
NoProductionBelow AVC
MR-MC APPROACH
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
AVC2
MC2
Higher Costs Move theSupply Curve to the LeftC
ost
an
d R
even
ue,
(d
oll
ars)
MC1
AVC1
Quantity Supplied
S1
S2
MR-MC APPROACH
Marginal Cost & Short-Run Supply
AVC2
MC2
Lower Costs Movethe Supply Curve
to the Right
Co
st a
nd
Rev
enu
e, (
do
llar
s)
MC1
AVC1
Quantity Supplied
S1
S2
MR-MC APPROACH
P
Q
S=MC
AVC
ATC
8
D
P
Q8000
D
S= MCs
IndustryFirm(price taker)
EconomicProfit
$111$111
SHORT-RUN COMPETITIVE EQUILIBRIUM
The Competitive Firm “Takes” itsPrice from the Industry Equilibrium
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
Assumptions... Entry and Exit Only Identical Costs Constant-Cost Industry
Goal of the AnalysisP= Minimum ATCLong-Run Equilibrium - TheZero Economic Profit Model
Temporary profits and the reestablishmentof long-run equilibrium
S1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
MR
D1
An increase in demand increases profits
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
D2
EconomicProfits
S1
New competitors increase supply, and lower prices decrease economic profits
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
D2
Zero EconomicProfits
S1
S2
Decreases in demand, losses, and the reestablishment of long-run equilibrium
S1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
D1
MR
A decrease in demand creates losses
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
D2
EconomicLosses
S1
MR
D1
MCATC
P
Q100
P
Q100,000
IndustryFirm(price taker)
$60
50
40
$60
50
40
PROFIT MAXIMIZATION IN THE LONG RUN
D2
Return to ZeroEconomic Profits
S1
S3
Competitors with losses decrease supply, andprices return to zero economic profits
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ACONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
Constant Cost Industry
Perfectly Elastic Long-Run Supply
Graphically...
P
Q
=$50 S
D1
Z1
Q1
D2
Z2
Q2Q3
D3
Z3
100,000 110,00090,000
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ACONSTANT COST INDUSTRY
P1
P2
P3
LONG-RUN SUPPLY IN ANINCREASING COST INDUSTRY
P
Q
$555045
S
D1
Y1
Q1
D2
Y2
Q2Q3
D3
Y3
100,000 110,00090,000
P1
P2
P3
Pri
ce
LONG-RUN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE FIRM
P MR
Q
MCATC
Quantity
P = MC = Minimum ATC(normal profit)
PURE COMPETITION & EFFICIENCY
Productive EfficiencyP = Minimum ATC
Allocative EfficiencyP = MC
Underallocation:
P > MCOverallocation:
P < MC
Work CitedMcConnell, R. Campbell and Stanley L. Brue.
Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005: 413-33