Pubmed Resultjhh

35
PMID- 18198331 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DA - 20080116 DCOM- 20080313 LR - 20081121 IS - 0890-9369 (Print) VI - 22 IP - 2 DP - 2008 Jan 15 TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight. PG - 121-4 AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. FAU - Cooper, Kimberly L AU - Cooper KL FAU - Tabin, Clifford J AU - Tabin CJ LA - eng GR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States GR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States PT - Comment PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural PL - United States TA - Genes Dev JT - Genes & development JID - 8711660 RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins) SB - IM CON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333 MH - Animals MH - Chiroptera/*genetics MH - *Evolution MH - Forelimb/anatomy & histology MH - Fossils MH - *Genetic Variation MH - Homeodomain Proteins/*genetics MH - Wing/*growth & development EDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00 MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00 CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00 AID - 22/2/121 [pii] AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4. PMID- 16618938 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DA - 20060427 DCOM- 20060615 LR - 20081120 IS - 0027-8424 (Print) VI - 103 IP - 17 DP - 2006 Apr 25 TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits. PG - 6581-6

description

ghg

Transcript of Pubmed Resultjhh

Page 1: Pubmed Resultjhh

PMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6

Page 2: Pubmed Resultjhh

AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal Article

Page 3: Pubmed Resultjhh

PT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may

Page 4: Pubmed Resultjhh

elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research SuppoPMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.

Page 5: Pubmed Resultjhh

PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record

Page 6: Pubmed Resultjhh

led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - Animals

Page 7: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in

Page 8: Pubmed Resultjhh

different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AFPMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660

Page 9: Pubmed Resultjhh

RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and incre

Page 10: Pubmed Resultjhh

ase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00

Page 11: Pubmed Resultjhh

PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

Page 12: Pubmed Resultjhh

FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/PMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

Page 13: Pubmed Resultjhh

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard R

Page 14: Pubmed Resultjhh

AU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6

Page 15: Pubmed Resultjhh

AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WPMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22

Page 16: Pubmed Resultjhh

IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive

Page 17: Pubmed Resultjhh

elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)

Page 18: Pubmed Resultjhh

RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that

Page 19: Pubmed Resultjhh

includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesPMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - eng

Page 20: Pubmed Resultjhh

GR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in win

Page 21: Pubmed Resultjhh

g digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - Fossils

Page 22: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteri

Page 23: Pubmed Resultjhh

s, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequencePMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States

Page 24: Pubmed Resultjhh

PT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*geneticsMH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that

Page 25: Pubmed Resultjhh

depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence Data

Page 26: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that la

Page 27: Pubmed Resultjhh

ryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WWLA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF33PMID- 18198331OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20080116DCOM- 20080313LR - 20081121IS - 0890-9369 (Print)VI - 22IP - 2DP - 2008 Jan 15TI - Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight.PG - 121-4AD - Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.FAU - Cooper, Kimberly LAU - Cooper KLFAU - Tabin, Clifford JAU - Tabin CJLA - engGR - F32 HD 052349/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - R37 HD 32443/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - CommentPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPL - United StatesTA - Genes DevJT - Genes & developmentJID - 8711660RN - 0 (Homeodomain Proteins)SB - IMCON - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):141-51. PMID: 18198333MH - AnimalsMH - Chiroptera/*geneticsMH - *EvolutionMH - Forelimb/anatomy & histologyMH - FossilsMH - *Genetic VariationMH - Homeodomain Proteins/*genetics

Page 28: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - Wing/*growth & developmentEDAT- 2008/01/17 09:00MHDA- 2008/03/14 09:00CRDT- 2008/01/17 09:00AID - 22/2/121 [pii]AID - 10.1101/gad.1639108 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Genes Dev. 2008 Jan 15;22(2):121-4.

PMID- 16618938OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20060427DCOM- 20060615LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 103IP - 17DP - 2006 Apr 25TI - Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits.PG - 6581-6AB - The earliest fossil bats resemble their modern counterparts in possessing greatly elongated digits to support the wing membrane, which is an anatomical hallmark of powered flight. To quantitatively confirm these similarities, we performed a morphometric analysis of wing bones from fossil and modern bats. We found that the lengths of the third, fourth, and fifth digits (the primary supportive elements of the wing) have remained constant relative to body size over the last 50 million years. This absence of transitional forms in the fossil record led us to look elsewhere to understand bat wing evolution. Investigating embryonic development, we found that the digits in bats (Carollia perspicillata) are initially similar in size to those of mice (Mus musculus) but that, subsequently, bat digits greatly lengthen. The developmental timing of the change in wing digit length points to a change in longitudinal cartilage growth, a process that depends on the relative proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. We found that bat forelimb digits exhibit relatively high rates of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. We show that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) can stimulate cartilage proliferation and differentiation and increase digit length in the bat embryonic forelimb. Also, we show that Bmp2 expression and Bmp signaling are increased in bat forelimb embryonic digits relative to mouse or bat hind limb digits. Together, our results suggest that an up-regulation of the Bmp pathway is one of the major factors in the developmental elongation of bat forelimb digits, and it is potentially a key mechanism in their

Page 29: Pubmed Resultjhh

evolutionary elongation as well.AD - Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.FAU - Sears, Karen EAU - Sears KEFAU - Behringer, Richard RAU - Behringer RRFAU - Rasweiler, John J 4thAU - Rasweiler JJ 4thFAU - Niswander, Lee AAU - Niswander LALA - engSI - GENBANK/DQ279782SI - GENBANK/DQ279783SI - GENBANK/DQ279784SI - GENBANK/DQ279785GR - F32 HD050042-01/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesGR - HD32427/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United StatesPT - Comparative StudyPT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20060417PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins)RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/geneticsMH - Chiroptera/anatomy & histology/embryology/*genetics/*physiologyMH - DNA, Complementary/geneticsMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Flight, AnimalMH - FossilsMH - MiceMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - Signal TransductionMH - Wing/*anatomy & histology/embryology/*physiologyPMC - PMC1458926OID - NLM: PMC1458926EDAT- 2006/04/19 09:00MHDA- 2006/06/16 09:00CRDT- 2006/04/19 09:00PHST- 2006/04/17 [aheadofprint]AID - 0509716103 [pii]AID - 10.1073/pnas.0509716103 [doi]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 25;103(17):6581-6. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

PMID- 11353869OWN - NLMSTAT- MEDLINEDA - 20010524

Page 30: Pubmed Resultjhh

DCOM- 20010719LR - 20081120IS - 0027-8424 (Print)VI - 98IP - 11DP - 2001 May 22TI - Integrated fossil and molecular data reconstruct bat echolocation.PG - 6241-6AB - Molecular and morphological data have important roles in illuminating evolutionary history. DNA data often yield well resolved phylogenies for living taxa, but are generally unattainable for fossils. A distinct advantage of morphology is that some types of morphological data may be collected for extinct and extant taxa. Fossils provide a unique window on evolutionary history and may preserve combinations of primitive and derived characters that are not found in extant taxa. Given their unique character complexes, fossils are critical in documenting sequences of character transformation over geologic time and may elucidate otherwise ambiguous patterns of evolution that are not revealed by molecular data alone. Here, we employ a methodological approach that allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most innovative features in the evolutionary history of mammals-laryngeal echolocation in bats. Molecular data alone, including an expanded data set that includes new sequences for the A2AB gene, suggest that microbats are paraphyletic but do not resolve whether laryngeal echolocation evolved independently in different microbat lineages or evolved in the common ancestor of bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. When scaffolds from molecular phylogenies are incorporated into parsimony analyses of morphological characters, including morphological characters for the Eocene taxa Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx, the resulting trees suggest that laryngeal echolocation evolved in the common ancestor of fossil and extant bats and was subsequently lost in megabats. Molecular dating suggests that crown-group bats last shared a common ancestor 52 to 54 million years ago.AD - Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.FAU - Springer, M SAU - Springer MSFAU - Teeling, E CAU - Teeling ECFAU - Madsen, OAU - Madsen OFAU - Stanhope, M JAU - Stanhope MJFAU - de Jong, W WAU - de Jong WW

Page 31: Pubmed Resultjhh

LA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.7541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *Fossils

Page 32: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.

MH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.

TA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.W

Page 33: Pubmed Resultjhh

LA - engSI - GENBANK/AF337537SI - GENBANK/AF337538SI - GENBANK/AF337539SI - GENBANK/AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.AF337540SI - GENBANK/AF337541SI - GENBANK/AF337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, Molecular

Page 34: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.337542SI - GENBANK/AF337543PT - Journal ArticlePT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, ComplementaryMH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.rt, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.DEP - 20010515PL - United StatesTA - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AJT - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaJID - 7505876RN - 0 (DNA, Complementary)SB - IMMH - AnimalsMH - Base SequenceMH - Chiroptera/classification/*geneticsMH - DNA, Complementary

Page 35: Pubmed Resultjhh

MH - EcosystemMH - *Evolution, MolecularMH - *FossilsMH - HumansMH - Molecular Sequence DataMH - PhylogenyPMC - PMC33452OID - NLM: PMC33452EDAT- 2001/05/17 10:00MHDA- 2001/07/20 10:01CRDT- 2001/05/17 10:00PHST- 2001/05/15 [aheadofprint]AID - 10.1073/pnas.111551998 [doi]AID - 111551998 [pii]PST - ppublishSO - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6241-6. Epub 2001 May 15.