Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

10
Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies Transportation Choices Andrew Austin, Field Director [email protected] 253- 732-9434

description

Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies. Transportation Choices Andrew Austin, Field Director [email protected] 253-732-9434. Local Reality: Transit Revenue Campaigns in Washington. We’ve passed 15 of 19 measures in the last 4 years. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Page 1: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Public Involvement and the Early

Education Campaign:

Washington State Case StudiesTransportation Choices

Andrew Austin, Field [email protected] 253-732-

9434

Page 2: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Local Reality:Transit Revenue Campaigns

in Washington

Page 3: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

We’ve passed 15 of 19 measures in the last 4

yearsExamples: Mass Transit Now

(Sound Transit) 2008 57% to 43%

Island Transit 2009 Passed 56% to 44%

Valley Transit 2010 Passed 75% to 25%

Jefferson Transit 2010 Passed

C-Tran, Vancouver, WA Passed 56% to 44% in November 2011

Page 4: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

A Tale of Two Measures Pierce Transit “Save Our Buses” measure fails in

February 2011 with a 46% to 54% margin. Bus service has been cut by 40%, buses stop running at 10pm.

C-Tran “Preserve our Buses” measure passes in Clark County by a 56% to 44% measure.

Both in predominately suburban communities Both were approximately $100,000 campaigns

that had almost identical field plans (approx. 10,000 voter contact calls made)

Same political consultant and level of involvement from Transportation Choices staff and resources

Page 5: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Two Very Different Outcomes

Page 6: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Two Very Different Outcomes

Page 7: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Why Pierce Lost and C-Tran Won

Organized opposition including the local paper that didn’t exist in Vancouver

Tighter campaign timeline with Feb. election in Pierce.

Slightly worse electorate in Pierce

Pre-campaign plan work, education, and polling

Page 8: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Setting yourself up for success: Pre-campaign to

do’sPolling is crucial! Combine polling results with direct

elected/board member lobbying to craft a winning package. (If we didn’t do this we probably would have lost in Vancouver)

If polling says you can’t win, don’t do it, reassess and find alternatives

Other than package shaping, using polling to craft your message and tone.

Page 9: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Pre-campaign Targets Transit agency staff and board: Craft

a package that can win. Top target coalition partners and

funders (i.e. ATU & Chamber): Ideally everyone feels bought into the decision going forward and was listened to throughout the process.

The general public/voters. Craft media stories, LTEs, social media, blogs, etc. covering decision to go to ballot in a way that aligns with future campaign messaging.

Page 10: Public Involvement and the Early Education Campaign: Washington State Case Studies

Setting up a big win! The Right Ask The Right Message An Existing and United Campaign

Committee from day -1.

Questions/Contact?Andrew [email protected]@transpochoices@transitdude