Public Awareness Program - tamuk. · PDF filePipeline and Hazardous Materials ... required to...
-
Upload
nguyenmien -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Public Awareness Program - tamuk. · PDF filePipeline and Hazardous Materials ... required to...
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Federal Regulations Reviewand
Inspection Updates
Public Awareness Program
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Topics
PHMSA 2013 Data Update
Public Awareness Regulations Review
Public Awareness Inspection Review
Gathering Line Overview
- 2 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
What We RegulatePipeline Miles by System Types – end of CY 2012, as-of 3/7/2014
System Type Miles %Total # Operators
Hazardous Liquid 185,629 7% 410
Gas Transmission 303,308 11% 953
Gas Gathering 16,728 1% 342
Gas Distribution
(Mains & Services )2,138,676 81% 1,356
Total 2,644,341Some Operators
have multiple
System Types
Liquefied Natural Gas 130 Plants 203 Tanks 82
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Categories of Incident Reports
4
All Reported – everything operators report
Serious – fatality or injury requiring in-patient hospitalization, but Fire First excluded. Fire First are gas
distribution incidents with a cause of “Other Outside Force Damage” and sub-cause of “Nearby Industrial, Man-made, or Other Fire/Explosion”
Significant include any of the following, but Fire First excluded: 1. Fatality or injury requiring in-patient hospitalization 2. $50,000 or more in total costs, measured in 1984 dollars 3. Highly volatile liquid (HVL) releases of 5 barrels or more 4. Non-HVL liquid releases of 50 barrels or more 5. Liquid releases resulting in an unintentional fire or explosion
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Serious IncidentsAll System Types downward trend continues in 2013
5
84% Gas Distribution
12% Hazardous Liquid
4% Gas Transmission
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Fatalities and InjuriesFatality count continuously down since 2010
6
Injury count down from 2012
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2013 Gas Distribution IncidentsTop Causes
• Excavation Damage
• Other Outside Force Damage
Serious Top Causes
• Excavation Damage
• Other
7
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Serious IncidentsAll System Types downward trend continues in 2013
8
Gas Distribution downward trend continues in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Significant IncidentsAll System Types slight rise in 2013
9
Gas Distribution slight rise in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Gas DistributionSignificant Incidents by Cause
- 10 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2013 Gas Gathering Incidents
11
Top Causes
• Corrosion
• Other
No SeriousIncidentssince 2006
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Significant IncidentsAll System Types slight rise in 2013
12
Gas Gathering slight decline in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
- 13 -
Gas GatheringSignificant Incidents by Cause
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2013 Gas Transmission Incidents
14
Top Causes
• Material/Weld/Equip Failure
• Corrosion
• Excavation Damage
Serious Incident caused by Corrosion
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Serious IncidentsAll System Types downward trend continues in 2013
15
Gas Transmission dips down to one again in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Significant IncidentsAll System Types slight rise in 2013
16
Gas Transmission slight rise in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
- 17 -
Gas TransmissionSignificant Incidents by Cause
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
GT Significant Incidents in
HCA per HCA Mile
Interstate Rate Less Than
18
Intrastate Rate
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2013 Hazardous Liquid Incidents
19
Top Causes
• Material/Weld/Equip Failure
• Corrosion
• Incorrect Operation
Serious Incidents
• Other and Outside Force
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration Serious IncidentsAll System Types downward trend continues in 2013
20
Hazardous Liquid rises to three in 2013
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Significant IncidentsAll System Types slight rise in 2013
21
Hazardous Liquid rises to the highest level since 1997
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
- 22 -
Hazardous LiquidSignificant Incidents by Cause
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration HL Large Spills in HCA per HCA Mile
23
Large Spills are accidents including one or more of these consequences:
• death or personal injury requiring hospitalization
• property damage greater than $50,000 in 1984 dollars
• more than 5 barrels released
• fire or explosion
• pollution of water
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness ProgramRegulations Review
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Background
• Regulatory Background
– Gas
1970: 192.615 (Emergency plans)
1983, 1995: 192.614 (Damage prevention )
1995: 192.616 (Public awareness)
– Liquid
1980: 195.440 (Public awareness)
1995: 195.442 (Damage prevention)
- 25 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Why Public Awareness? It’s the Law
• Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002
– Each pipeline facility operator “shall carry out a
continuing program to educate the public…”
– “The Secretary may issue standards prescribing
elements of an effective public education program
• Final Rule in May 2005 (Docket RSPA-03-15852);
effective June 20, 2005
– 192.616 for Natural Gas Pipelines
– 195.440 for Hazardous Liquids Pipelines
– Incorporated by reference the guidelines
in API RP 1162, Public Awareness Programs for
Pipeline Operators, 1st Edition- 26 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Subpart L – Operations
192.616
Transportation of
natural and other gas
by pipeline
Parts 186 to 199
Subpart F – O&M
Part 195.440
Transportation of
hazardous liquids by
pipeline
TITLE 49
Subtitle B Chapter I
Subchapter D
(Pipeline Safety)
Where are Public Awareness Rules?
- 27 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
§192.616/ §195.440 Public Awareness
a) * Must develop and implement a written continuing public
education program that follows the guidance provided in the
API RP 1162.
b) * Must follow general program recommendations of API RP
1162 and assess the unique attributes and characteristics of
operator’s pipeline and facilities.
c) * Must follow general program recommendations, including
baseline and supplemental requirements of API RP 1162, unless
operator provides written justification why compliance with all
or certain provisions of the recommended practice is not
practicable and not necessary for safety.
Public Awareness Regulations
* Master meter & petroleum gas operators exempt (unless transports gas as primary activity). - 28 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
§ 192.616/ §195.440 Public Awareness
d) * Program must specifically include provisions to educate the
public, appropriate government organizations, and persons
engaged in excavation related activities on:
(1) Use of a one-call notification system prior to
excavation and other damage prevention activities;
(2) Possible hazards associated with unintended releases
from a pipeline facility;
(3) Physical indications that such a release may have occurred;
(4) Steps that should be taken for public safety in the event
of a pipeline release; and
(5) Procedures for reporting such an event.
Public Awareness Regulations
* Master meter & petroleum gas operators exempt (unless transports gas as primary activity). - 29 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
§ 192.616/ §195.440 Public Awareness
e) * Program must include activities to advise affected
municipalities, school districts, businesses, and
residents of pipeline facility locations.
f) * Program and the media used must be as
comprehensive as necessary to reach all areas in which
the operator transports gas.
g) * Program must be conducted in English and in other
languages commonly understood by a significant
number and concentration of the non-English speaking
population in the operator's area.
Public Awareness Regulations
* Master meter & petroleum gas operators exempt (unless transports gas as primary activity). - 30 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
§192.616/ §195.440 Public Awareness
h) Operators in existence on June 20, 2005, must have
completed their written programs no later than June 20,
2006 (June 13, 2008 for master meter or petroleum gas
system operators).
i) Program documentation and evaluation results must be
available for periodic review by appropriate regulatory
agencies.
Public Awareness Regulations
* Master meter & petroleum gas operators exempt (unless transports gas as primary activity). - 31 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
- 32 -
Public Awareness Regulations
§ 192.616/ §195.440 Public Awareness
j) Unless the operator transports gas as a primary activity,
master meter or petroleum gas system operators are not
required to develop a public awareness program as
prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (g). Instead must
develop and implement a written procedure to provide its
customers public awareness messages twice annually.
The message must include:
1) A description of the purpose and reliability of the
pipeline
2) An overview of the hazards of the pipeline and
prevention measures used;
3) Information about damage prevention;
4) How to recognize and respond to a leak; and
5) How to get additional information.
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Other Relevant Sections
• Public Awareness interacts other sections of code
– Damage Prevention
• §192.614 and §195.442
– Emergency Response
• §192.615 and §195.402(e)(8)
– Integrity Management – Subpart O
– Alternative MAOP - §192.620
– Special Permits
- 33 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
API RP 1162, 1st Edition, Dec 2003
• Incorporated by reference (in its entirety)
into Parts 192 and 195
• Contains additional requirements
– Message Frequencies
– Message Content
– Supplemental Enhancements
– Program Evaluation
- 34 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Related Advisory Bulletins
• PHMSA-2010-0307: Pipeline Safety: Emergency Preparedness
Communications
• ADB-05-03: Planning for Coordination of Emergency Response
to Pipeline Emergencies
• ADB-03-04: Pipeline Safety: Pipeline Industry Implementation of
Effective Public Awareness Programs
• ADB-03-08: Self-Assessment of Pipeline Operator Public
Education Programs
• ADB-93-02: Advisory to Owners and Operators of Gas
Distribution and Gas Transmission Facilities; Continuing Educational
Program for Gas Customers and the Public
• ALN-91-04: NTSB recommendations S P-91-3/P-91-4, 03/15/90
NY leak/explosion: Requiring operators to extend their public
education/emergency preparedness programs - 35 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Additional Guidance
• The intent of the regulation is that messages should
provide “enough information so that in the event of a
pipeline emergency, the intended audience will know
how to identify a potential hazard, protect
themselves, notify emergency response personnel,
and notify the pipeline operator” (API RP 1162,
Section 4)
• Generic messages do not meet the intent of the PAP
regulations because they do not necessarily provide
“awareness”
• Message content must be pipeline system and
product specific
- 36 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Resources• Regulatory Requirements
• API RP 1162
• Public Awareness Program Workshops
• Inspection and Enforcement Documents
• FAQs
http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/PublicAwareness/PublicAwareness.htm?nocache=8605- 37 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness ProgramInspection Status
- 38 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• PAP Inspection timeline:
– Federal PAP Inspections completed by end of 2012
– Interstate agent inspections completed by end of 2012
– States are also incorporating PAP inspections into their normal inspection cycle by end of 2013
• Finalized documented published online:
– PAP Effectiveness Inspection Form
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/forms
– PAP Enforcement Guidance Document
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/foia/e-reading-room
PAP Inspection Updates
- 39 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
PAP Completed Inspections:
– Total PAP Inspections end of 2012
»313
– PHMSA lead Inspections end of 2012
»135
– States Lead PAP inspections end of 2012
»178
PAP Inspection Updates
- 40 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
PAPEE Completed Inspections
End of 2012 End of 2013
Total Inspections 313 614
PHMSA Lead 135 135
State Lead 178 477
PAP Inspection Updates
- 41 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection One (2012)
- 42 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection One (2013)
- 43 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2012SECTION AGENCY
HEADER Satisfactory UnsatisfactoryNot
ApplicableNot
Checked total % Unsat
1.01 PHMSA Written Public Education Program 561 53 3 4 621 8.53%
1.02 PHMSA
Management Support 535 75 4 6 620 12.10%
1.03 PHMSA Unique Attributes and Characteristics 533 73 10 5 621 11.76%
1.04 PHMSA Stakeholder Audience Identification 512 98 3 5 618 15.86%
1.05 PHMSA Message Frequency and Message Delivery 574 42 0 5 621 6.76%
1.06 PHMSA Written Evaluation Plan 508 102 4 5 619 16.48%
- 44 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2013SECTION AGENCY
HEADER SAT UNSAT N/ANot
Checked total % Unsat
1.01 PHMSA Written Public Education Program 112 20 2 1 135 14.81%
1.02 PHMSAManagement Support 108 22 2 3 135 16.30%
1.03 PHMSAUnique Attributes and Characteristics 106 25 2 2 135 18.52%
1.04 PHMSAStakeholder Audience Identification 81 49 1 2 133 36.84%
1.05 PHMSA Message Frequency and Message Delivery 118 14 0 2 134 10.45%
1.06 PHMSAWritten Evaluation Plan 91 40 2 2 135 29.63%
- 45 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
1.04 – Stakeholder Audience Identification
• Missed Audiences/ Parts of Audiences
• Didn’t include other information in audience
ID (IMP) to Establish distance either side of
pipeline
1.06 – Written Evaluation Plan
• Written plan to conduct and evaluate
• Correct Frequencies
• Statistical Sample Size, Confidence Level and
M.O.E., by Stakeholder Audience
Section One
- 46 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Written program described who, what, when,
where, how, why
• Cross referenced to other company procedures
such as:
– Emergency response plans
– Integrity management plans
• Unique attributes not listed or specific, missing:
– System type
– Types of products
– Lines and/or facilities covered
– All company assets/facilities covered
Written PAP
- 47 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness Inspections Section Two (2012)
- 48 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness Inspections Section Two (2013)
- 49 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2012
SECTION2.01 PHMSA English and other Languages 508 86 24 3 621 13.85%
2.02 PHMSA Message Type and Content 487 129 1 4 621 20.77%
2.03 PHMSAMessages on Pipeline Facility Locations 488 100 30 4 622 16.08%
2.04 PHMSA Baseline Message Delivery Frequency 498 113 4 4 619 18.26%
2.05 PHMSAConsiderations for Supplemental Program Enhancements 511 96 9 4 620 15.48%
2.06 PHMSAMaintaining Liaison with Emergency Response Officials 509 99 5 4 617 16.05%
- 50 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
20132.01 PHMSA English and other
Languages92 39 2 2 135 28.89%
2.02 PHMSA Message Type and Content
79 53 1 2 135 39.26%
2.03 PHMSA
Messages on Pipeline Facility Locations
114 15 4 2 135 11.11%
2.04 PHMSA
Baseline Message Delivery Frequency
108 23 2 2 135 17.04%
2.05 PHMSA Considerations for Supplemental Program
Enhancements
103 26 4 2 135 19.26%
2.06 PHMSAMaintaining Liaison
with Emergency Response Officials
97 32 3 3 135 23.70%
- 51 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2.01 - English and Other Languages
Process, Frequency, Source
2.02 - Message Type and Content
Message Mapping (1162 / PAP/ Brochures)
2.04 - Delivery of materials and messages
Meet or exceed the baseline frequencies
specified
2.06 - Maintaining Liaison with Emergency
Responders
ERP Available, Sharing Capabilities
Non-Attendees (Closing the Loop) every three yrs
Section Two
- 52 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Defined process with thresholds for actions
• Commonly provided in Spanish (as default)
• Emergency Response & Public Official
(English only)
• (800) Translation number on print material
• TDD/TYY (speech - hearing impaired #on print
material)
ImplementationLanguages
- 53 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Increased message delivery frequency
• Messages in multiple languages
• Emergency # translates to other languages
(Spanish, French, Japanese, Russian, Korean,
Arabic, etc)
• 24 hour public awareness phone #
• Agricultural mailings
• Scratch and sniff NG cards
• ER website portal to get operator specific
information (capabilities across the state)
ImplementationSupplemental Enhancements
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Operator
Specific
Collaborative
Educating Stakeholders
???
ImplementationMessages
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Collaborative operator public meetings (limited
specific operator interaction)
• Tracked who attended meetings and followed up
• Verified ER lists for accurate contact information
• Generic information sent may not motivate to
attend
• Inconsistent information shared from ER plan
• Difficult getting ER officials engaged
ImplementationMaintaining Liaison w/ ER Officials
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection Three (2012)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection Three (2013)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2012
3.01 PHMSA Measuring Program Implementation 427 179 9 4 619 28.92%
3.02 PHMSA Acceptable Methods for Program Implementation
Audits 520 83 13 4 620 13.39%
3.03 PHMSA Program Changes and Improvements 480 117 16 4 617 18.96%
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
20133.01 PHMSA
Measuring Program
Implementation
87 42 4 2 135 31.11%
3.02 PHMSAAcceptable Methods for
Program Implementation Audits
116 13 4 2 135 9.63%
3.03 PHMSAProgram Changes
and Improvements
101 28 3 2 134 20.90%
Averages 101 28 4 2 135 21%
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
3.01 - Measuring Program Implementation
• Documents that Verify Annual Review
• Guide a Consistent Process.
3.03 - Program Changes and Improvements
(Document what was reviewed, Considered,
Decisions, implementation, by whom and
by Date Due)
Section Three
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Some operators:
• Documented meetings, dates, participants, agenda
• Meeting with cross-functional review teams (or prevent
silos)
• Defined/monitored metrics
• Combined annual audit & effectiveness evaluation in
year 4
• Linked timing and review with other programs:
• Integrity management
• Emergency response
Evaluations (Annual Audits)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Changes/documented tracked?
• Implemented changes during next year
• Verified adequate resources were available
• Updated written plan
• Obtained current management support
• Reviewed supplemental enhancements
• Changes to print material
Program Changes and Improvements
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection Four (2012)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Public Awareness InspectionsSection Four (2013)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
2012
4.01 PHMSAEvaluating Program Effectiveness 386 200 25 7 618 32.36%
4.02 PHMSA Measure Program Outreach 424 152 35 8 619 24.56%
4.03 PHMSA Measure Percentage Stakeholders Reached 421 153 36 8 618 24.76%
4.04 PHMSAMeasure Understandability of Message Content 413 165 33 8 619 26.66%
4.05 PHMSA Measure Desired Stakeholder Behavior 421 151 33 10 615 24.55%
4.06 PHMSA Measure Bottom-Line Results 412 164 33 9 618 26.54%
4.07 PHMSA
Program Changes 429 140 36 10 615 22.76%
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
20134.01 PHMSA
Evaluating Program Effectiveness
74 47 11 3 135 34.81%
4.02 PHMSAMeasure Program
Outreach81 41 10 3 135 30.37%
4.03 PHMSAMeasure Percentage
Stakeholders Reached
77 44 11 3 135 32.59%
4.04 PHMSAMeasure
Understandability of Message Content
73 49 10 3 135 36.30%
4.05 PHMSAMeasure Desired
Stakeholder Behavior
73 46 9 5 133 34.59%
4.06 PHMSAMeasure Bottom-Line
Results93 28 9 4 134 20.90%
4.07 PHMSA Program Changes 82 37 10 3 132 28.03%
- 67 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
4.01 - Evaluating Program Effectiveness
4 years from Implementation, Sample Size, MOE,
Confidence Level
4.02 - Measure Outreach
Actual Number by Stakeholder Audience
4.03 - Percentage of Stakeholders Reached
4.04 - Understandability of Message Content
4.05 - Desired Stakeholder Behavior
4.06 - Bottom Line Results
Considered other Bottom Line Measures
4.07 - Program Changes
Document Changes -
Section Four
- 68 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
How effective is the operator’s public
awareness program?
• Collecting data is not the only component to
completing an effectiveness evaluation.
• Operator effectiveness evaluations should:
• Identify program metrics
• Describe evaluation methodology
• Summarize findings or conclusions
• Identify changes in written plan and/or
implementation
Section Four
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
• Most operators putting forth effort and
improving programs with creative approaches
• Process/methodology improvements are needed
with annual audits/effectiveness evaluations
• Motivating stakeholders to stop, listen, and
change
• Balancing information overload with specific
messages
Conclusion
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Gathering Pipelines
• What is a gathering pipeline?
transport gases and liquids from the commodity's
source - to a processing facility, refinery or a
transmission line.
• Gathering lines are defined as:
For natural gas, a pipeline that transports gas from a
current production facility to a transmission line or
main (49 CFR 192.3) as determined using an industry
standard (49 CFR 192.8).
For hazardous liquids, a pipeline 219.1 mm (8 5/8 in) or
less in nominal outside diameter that transports
petroleum from a production facility (49 CFR 195.2).- 71 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Gas Gathering
• §192.8 How are onshore gathering lines and
regulated onshore gathering lines determined?
An operator must use API RP 80 (incorporated by
reference, see §192.7), to determine if an onshore
pipeline (or part of a connected series of pipelines) is
an onshore gathering line. The determination is subject
to the limitations listed below.
After making this determination, an operator must
determine if the onshore gathering line is a regulated
onshore gathering line under paragraph (b) of this
section. (Type A or B)- 72 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Gas Gathering
• §192.9 What requirements apply to gathering
lines?
Offshore gas gathering pipelines and high-
pressure onshore lines (Type A) must meet all
requirements of 49 CFR192 applicable to gas
transmission pipelines.
Onshore gas gathering pipelines that operate at
lower pressures (Type B) must comply with a
subset of these requirements specified in 49 CFR
192.9.
- 73 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Liquids Gathering
• §195.11 What is a regulated rural gathering line
& what requirements apply?
A regulated rural gathering line means an onshore
gathering line in a rural area that has: a nominal
diameter from 6 5/8 inches (168 mm) to 8 5/8 inches
(219.1 mm); is located in or within one-quarter mile (.40
km) of an unusually sensitive area as defined in
§195.6; and operates at a maximum pressure
corresponding to a stress level greater than 20-percent
of the specified minimum yield strength of the line
pipe; or if the stress level is unknown or the pipeline is
not constructed with steel pipe, a pressure of more
than 125 psi (861 kPa) gage.- 74 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Liquids Gathering
• §195.11 What is a regulated rural gathering
line & what requirements apply?
Prepare, follow, and maintain written procedures
Identify all segments of pipeline meeting the criteria.
Design, install, construct, inspect, and test the in compliance with this part.
For non-steel pipelines constructed after, notification requirement.
Reporting requirements in subpart B.- 75 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Liquids Gathering• §195.11 What is a regulated rural gathering line
& what requirements apply?
Establish maximum operating pressure.
Install and maintain line markers.
Continuing public education program.
Damage prevention program.
External corrosion control for steel pipelines.
Internal corrosion prevention and mitigation for steel pipelines.
Operator Qualification.- 76 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Gathering Pipelines
• If regulation is eventually extended to all
onshore gathering pipelines, who will be in
charge of regulating them?
Most onshore gathering pipelines begin and end in
the same state. While PHMSA is responsible for
conducting inspections on pipelines that cross state
boundaries, individual states' w/certified pipeline
safety agencies govern lines that do not. Intrastate
pipelines are regulated by these agencies through
adoption and enforcement of PHMSA Federal safety
standards. PHMSA's role is to oversee state agency
performance. The State maintains direct regulatory
authority, but must maintain Federal Regulations.- 77 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Links to PHMSA Gathering Pipeline Information
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/
http://phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/guidance
http://phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/regs/advisory-bulletin
- 78 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Questions
Contact: William (Bill) LowryCommunity Assistance & Technical Services
Thank you!