Psychology Ch. 1 From Myers, Psychology 8e From Myers, Psychology 8e.
Psychology
-
Upload
hiren-siva -
Category
Education
-
view
47 -
download
0
Transcript of Psychology
![Page 1: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
FOUNDATION IN NATURAL & BUILT ENVIRONMENT (FNBE)
NAME: HIRENDRAN
STUDENT ID: 0319894
SUBJECT: SOCIAL PSYCOLOGY
LECTURER: MR SHANKAR
TUTORIAL GROUP: MONDAY 2PM-4PM
SUBMISSION DATE: 27TH APRIL 2015
![Page 2: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
JOURNAL 1
ENTRY 1: SOCIAL LOAFING
28TH MARCH 2015
Being a student of architecture, a lot of our assignments or projects consist of group work, which
leads to one of the most common problems faced by architecture students which is the “Free-Rider’
problem. This phenomena can be tied to the social psychology theory of social loafing. Social loafing
is a phenomenon when individuals exerts less effort to achieve a goal when they work in a group
than when they work alone. In social loafing, the individual effort cannot be identified. In 1883, Max
Ringelmann conducted a study from which he concluded that an individual’s performance actually
gets worse in the presence of others. This theory occurs in the everyday life of an architecture
student. One of my own personal experience of social loafing is among my group members. During
our recent Culture and Civilization project, we were to separate ourselves into groups of 10. Thus me
some of my friends formed a group. Almost everyone in that group were standout performers
individually. Thus, the reason why we decided to form a group together. Being a group with a lot of
standout performers, we thought our project would go smoothly but it did not. I noticed that some
of the members who were really talented individuals, did not perform to their standard.
![Page 3: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
JOURNAL 2
ENTRY 1: INDIVIDUALISTIC AND COLLECTIVE CULTURE
3RD APRIL 2015
“...If there is no risk, there is no reward.” This saying perfectly expresses my supportive views on
practicing individualistic culture. Individualistic culture is the focus of independence over collective
goals, whereas collective culture is the focus on interdependence and group goals. As a Malaysian of
Indian heritage, collective culture is observed and practiced in my family and community. Growing
up as a child, I always knew that I had to study and work hard so that I could obtain a professional
degree and hold a respected job. Most of my family members are either doctors, lawyers, or
engineers, therefore, there was always this pressure to have a highly respected career. But as I
reached towards the end of my teenage years, I realized that life isn’t just about being wealthy. At
the age of 17, I was really passionate about a career in film. I wanted to leave the country and chase
a dream that I was passionate about. Thus, accepting the individualistic culture of the westerners in
the process. I did not really think about what my family would think of the idea or what society’s
perception would be of my personal goals. All I wanted was to do something I loved for the rest of
my life. I realized this after watching this a film, Rushmore by Wes Anderson which consisted of one
of my favourite dialogs.
Herman Blume: What's the secret, Max?
Max Fischer: The secret?
Herman Blume: Yeah, you seem to have it pretty figured out.
Max Fischer: The secret, I don't know... I guess you've just gotta find something you love to do and
then... do it for the rest of your life.
![Page 4: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
My parents were against it my career choice. They felt it was too risky and they were not too
comfortable with the idea of a career in film. It was out of the norm and many of my aunts and
uncles advised against it. They wanted me to have a professional degree whilst lifting the family
name in the process. This shows that they practiced collective culture and were more concerned
with the goals of the family instead of my own personal goals. Thus, as the result of collective
culture, here I am pursuing a degree in architecture. Hopefully once I’ve obtained my degree I will be
able to pursue the dream I’m most passionate about.
![Page 5: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
JOURNAL 3
ENTRY 1: STEREOTYPING
8TH APRIL 2015
In a multi-cultural country like Malaysia, racial stereotyping is a common phenomenon. A stereotype
assumes that all members of a group share some common feature. This is caused through the
perseverance effect where once a schema is formed, it is hard to change or ‘let go’ of these schemas.
One of my personal experience of stereotyping begins with a car ride. Myself and 4 other friends, all
of Indian race, were driving at 2am, coming back from my friend’s house after a game of FIFA. We
came to a roadblock where we were stopped by the police. The policer officer shined the torch light
into our car and even though everything was intact. Eg: we were all wearing our seatbelt, the car had
a “P” sticker and we did not break any rules, we were stilled pulled over. After checking our license
and registration, we were still held at the roadside and they asked us to open the booth. The
ransacked through the booth and found nothing. All 5 of us were then subjected to a body check
before they checked the car itself. One of my friends insisted to know the reason why we were being
heavily checked. Their answer was “ Lima budak India keluar rumah pukul 2 pagi mesti nak buat
hal ni” ( Five Indian boys out at 2am are sure to cause trouble). This took us aback as all of us were
good students who were just out to play a football video game. The police were stereotyping us as
trouble causing Indians just because we were out late at night. We ended up being held at the
roadblock for about half an hour only to be released innocent.
![Page 6: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
JOURNAL 4
ENTRY 1: FIRST IMPRESSIONS
16TH APRIL 2015
When I was younger, I used to play this game we called “Shoe-Face” with some of my friends in the
LRT where we would look at other people’s shoes and try to guess what they would look like and
what type of person they could be just based on their shoes. This was one of my fondest memories
of first impressions. People say you only have one opportunity to make a first impression which is
true no doubt. First impressions are not deliberate, they are not formed by watching others actions
they are almost instantaneous. According to research, first impressions can be formed within 10
seconds of meeting an individual. A more detailed experience of my encounter with first impressions
happened when I met one of my closest friends in college. During our very first encounter, she
wasn’t dressed appropriately but she was very friendly and upfront about things. This made me form
an immediate first impression that she was one of those girls who loved late night partying and
socializing. And of course she turned out to be the total opposite. I followed through by asking if she
liked going to raves or clubbing and she simply answered “No”. I was a bit taken aback by the
answer, but after getting to know her over the past 9 months I can totally believe it. Turns out, she
hates clubs because of the smell of cigarettes, she’s hardly ever been to a rave and she’s a staunch
Christian. In conclusion, my first impression of my friend was invalid. Also, I should’ve mentioned this
earlier but I was terrible at the “Shoe-Face” game.
![Page 7: Psychology](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022091122/589d3a741a28abd17d8b62af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
JOURNAL 5
ENTRY 1: POST-DECISION DISSONANCE
23RD APRIL 2015
Post-decision dissonance basically states that after we make a decision between two equal options,
we get uncomfortable and start to wonder if we made the right decision. This discomfort causes us
to pinpoint all the positives of our chosen option and all the negatives of the unchosen one. Being
someone who is always indecisive, I am able to relate to this theory very well. Ever since I was young
I always felt a sense of regret after buying a new toy and finding out there was a better toy out
there. Until this age, I still experience post decision dissonance. In the year 2013, I spent a year
saving up money to buy a camera and by December 2013 I got my first ever DSLR camera. Before
making my decision on which model I should purchase, I had done research on different models and
it came down between the Canon 700D and the Canon 60D. I knew for a fact that the Canon 60D
was a much more capable camera but it was a bit pricy. So I settled for the Canon 700D. After a few
months of exploring and using my camera, I realized it was not very efficient or as good as I hoped it
would be. I felt a slight bit of regret knowing that I should have bought the Canon 60D instead. I
started experiencing post-decision dissonance by telling myself that I made the right decision. As
much as I hate to admit it, I did think of all the additional qualities my camera had over the Canon
60D. I also looked into what I could have done with the extra money I saved. Thus, I’ve decided to let
the post-decision dissonance take over my thoughts even though I still prefer the Canon 60D.