Psych 24 history of personality assessment

41

description

(c) ms. Ching Olasiman

Transcript of Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Page 1: Psych 24 history of personality assessment
Page 2: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

According to Adams (1954, cited in Schultz & Schultz, 1994)

Page 3: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

… that we get a good idea of what personality is by listening to what we say when we use "I".  When you say I, you are, in effect, summing up everything about yourself - your likes and dislikes, fears and virtues, strengths and weaknesses.

Page 4: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Description: considers the ways in which we should characterize and individual. Should we described personality traits by comparing people with one another or use strategy to study individuals?

• Dynamics: How do people adjust their life situations? How are they influenced by culture and their own cognitive processes?

• Development: How does it reflect the influence of biological factors and experience in childhood and beyond?

Page 5: Psych 24 history of personality assessment
Page 6: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Personality assessments help explain behavior.

Often, assessments are the only way of understanding and explaining behavior.

Page 7: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Psychological assessments involve the observation, measurement and evaluation of an individual's or organization's adaptive functioning in the modern world.

Page 8: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Prior to any treatment or remediation can begin, it's important to understand the nature of the problem or difficulty.

• A psychological assessment is the necessary first step in determining the strengths and weaknesses in an individual's functioning when that functioning has been called into question, either by displaying actions that are unexpected or by not displaying actions that are expected, in a given circumstance or environment.

Page 9: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Developmental Focus• Supervision, File Review, Expert

Testimony and Continuing Education Services

• Clinical and Case Consultation• Academic and School Referrals• Clinical and Professional Applications• Forensic and Disability Applications• Family Law Issues•

Page 10: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Assessment

Page 11: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Earliest form of obtaining information from clients was through clinical interviewing

• Modeled after question and answer format• More structured and goal-oriented mental

status examination– By Adolf Meyer 1902

• The difficulty with unstructured interviews is that they are still considered questionable reliability, validity, cost effectiveness

• Standardized psychological test were developed to overcome these limitations.

• Groth-Marmath, G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment 4th ed.

Page 12: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Content vs process – W.Synder(1945) found out that non-directive approach was most likely create favorable changes and self-exploration of clients. While the directive style using persuation, interpretation and interview judgment may resulted a defensive client and resistant in expressing problems.

Page 13: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Considerable amount of research was stimulated by C. Rogers who emphasized understanding the proper interpersonal ingredients necessary for standard care.

• 1960s development and formulation of behavioral assessment, primarily in the form of goal-directed interviews that focused on understanding current and past reinforcers and stablishing workable target behavior.

Page 14: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

1950s – 1960s – child assessment was conducted primarily through interview with parents. Direct interviews with the child were considered to be therapeutic purposes rather than assessment. Differential diagnosis were unusual: almost all children were referred were diagnosed or undiagnosed as “adjustment reactions”.

Page 15: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Elaboration of the trend during 1960s, as well as the increase emphasis on structured interview.

Page 16: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Both structured and unstructured interview allows a clinicians to place results in a wider, more meaningful context.

Flexibility is inherent both unstructured and structured interviews frequently the strongest advantage over standardized tests.

Allow clinician in establishing rapport and client self-exploration

Page 17: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Extreme disadvantage of with structured interviews is the interviewers bias.

Structured interviews have higher psychometric properties than unstructured format.

Page 18: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• General consideration – interviewer style is strongly influenced by theoritical orientation and practical considerations. Diagnostic interview – to develop a specific

diagnosis Behavioral interview – based on the

assumption that change occurs because of external consequences

Informal/Exploratory – person centered and do not pursue formal diagnosis. Client’s coping style social supports, family dynamics or the nature of disability

Page 19: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• History of the problem– Description of the problem, initial onset, frequency,

duration, attempts to solve, treatments• Family background

– Socioecomic level, parent occupation, emotional history, cultural background, parent’s current health, family relationship, urban rural upbringing

• Personal History– Infancy, early and middle adulthood, medical history,

toilet training, life changes• Miscellaneous– Somatic concerns, self-concept (like/dislike)

happiest/saddest memory, fears

Page 20: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Clarification statements

Verbatim playback Probing Confrontation Active listening Understanding Reflection

Use of concrete examples

therapeutic double binds

Random probing Self-disclosure Feedback Summary statement

Page 21: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Initial phase – organize the physical characteristics : room, lighting, seating

• Introduction• State the purpose of interview• Explain how the information derived

from the interview be used• Describe the confidential nature of the

information• Explain the role of activities you would

like the client to engage in e.g. Instruments, length of time, or formalized written contract

• Fee arrangements must be clarified

Page 22: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Direct Indirect

Objective tests Free response measures (projective

tests)

Page 23: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Objective personality tests are usually self-report inventories.Self-report inventories are paper-and-pen tests that require people to answer questions about their typical behavior. Commonly used objective tests include the MMPI-2, the 16PF, and the NEO Personality Inventory.

Page 24: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

The MMPI-2 The Minnesota Multiphasic

Personality Inventory (MMPI) was developed in the 1940s and revised in the 1980s. The revised version is called the MMPI-2. The MMPI-2 contains a list of 567 questions. People taking the test must answer these questions with true, false, or cannot say.

Page 25: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

The 16PFThe Sixteen Personality Factor

Questionnaire (16PF) is a test that assesses sixteen basic dimensions of personality. It consists of a list of 187 questions.

Page 26: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Projective personality tests require subjects to respond to ambiguous stimuli, such as pictures and phrases, that can be interpreted in many different ways. Projective tests are based on the projective hypothesis, which is the idea that people interpret ambiguous stimuli in ways that reveal their concerns, needs, conflicts, desires, and feelings.

Page 27: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• The Rorschach test consists of a series of ten inkblots. Psychologists ask subjects to look at the inkblots and describe what they see, and the psychologists then use complex scoring systems to interpret the subjects’ responses. Scores are based on various characteristics of responses, such as the originality of the response and the area of the blot described in the response. The Rorschach gives information about the person’s personality traits and the situational stresses the subject may be experiencing.

Page 28: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Self-report inventories are useful because they allow clincians to get precise answers to standardized questions. In other words, all subjects who take a test answer the same questions, and all subjects have to select answers from the same range of options. Inventories are also objective, which means that different people scoring the same test would score them in the same way. However, these scores might be interpreted differently by different people.

Page 29: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Self-report inventories often contain transparent questions, which means subjects can figure out what a psychologist wants to measure. Therefore, subjects can lie intentionally and fake personality traits they don’t really have.

• The social desirability bias can affect responses on self-report inventories. In other words, when filling out an inventory, people might state what they wish were true, rather than what is true.

• People sometimes don’t understand the questions on the test.

• People sometimes don’t remember aspects of the experience they are asked about.

Page 30: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

 (TAT) consists of a series of pictures containing a variety of characters and scenes. Psychologists ask subjects to make up stories about each picture and look for themes that run through the subjects’ responses. For example, a person with a high need for achievement may consistently come up with stories that have achievement-related themes.

Page 31: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Projective Tests

• Projective tests are useful because they allow psychologists to assess unconscious aspects of personality. Projective tests are also not transparent: subjects cannot figure out how their responses will be interpreted. Therefore, subjects cannot easily fake personality traits on a projective test.

• A serious disadvantage of projective tests is that they have questionable reliability and validity. Despite this flaw, many researchers and clinicians find that such tests give them useful information.

Page 32: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Numerology- Pythagoras

- Various operations are performed with numbers and the results are predictive of personality and future events

Phrenology– Franz Gall & Johan Spurzheim (c. 1800) Bumps on the head are associated with organs ofthe brain which are in turn associated withpersonality characteristics

Page 33: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Ancient Greeks & Romans– Aristotle (384-322 BC) & Plato (427-347 BC)

• Nutritive soul (plants)• Sensitive soul (all animals)• Rational soul (human beings)

– Hippocrates (460-377 BC), modified by Galen• (200 BC)• Four humours– Sanguine– Melancholic– Choleric– Phlegmatic

Page 34: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

• Graphology– Analysis of personality from handwriting– Examine handwriting as physical manifestation ofunconscious processes– No data to support• Techniques are reducible to impressions from

suchthings as pressure exerted on the page, spacing ofwords and letters, size, slant, speed, and

consistencyof writing.• Content plays a role, too, though they won’t

admit it.

Page 35: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Astrology– Based on the idea that the position

of the sun,moon, stars, planets and other heavenly bodies at some point in time influence the personality characteristics of the perso

Page 36: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Animal Year

Rabbit 1927, 1939, 1951, 1963,1975, 1987, 1999

Dragon 1928, 1940, 1952, 1964,1976, 1988, 2000

Snake 1929, 1941, 1953, 1965,1977, 1989, 2001

Horse 1930, 1942, 1954, 1966,1978, 1990, 2002

Sheep 1931, 1943, 1955, 1967,1979, 1991, 2003

Monkey 1932, 1944, 1956, 1968,1980, 1992, 2004

Cock/chicken 1933, 1945, 1957, 1969,1981, 1993, 2005

Page 37: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Animal Year Personality characteristics

Rabbit 1927, 1939, 1951, 1963,1975, 1987, 1999

Luckiest of all signs. Individuals are talented and articulate. Affectionate yetshy, they seek peace throughout their lives. Should marry a Sheep or a Boar.Opposite is the Cock.

Dragon 1928, 1940, 1952, 1964,1976, 1988, 2000

These individuals are eccentric and their lives are complex. They have a verypassionate nature and abundant health. They should marry a Rat or aMonkey late in life. They should avoid the Dog.

Page 38: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Snake 1929, 1941, 1953, 1965,1977, 1989, 2001

These individuals are wise and intense with a tendency towards physical beauty. They are vain and high-tempered. The Boar is their enemy. The Cock or the Ox are their best signs.

Horse 1930, 1942, 1954, 1966,1978, 1990, 2002

These individuals are popular and attractive to the opposite sex. They are often ostentatious and impatient. They need to be around people. They should marry a Dog or a Tiger early in life but should never marry a Rat.

Sheep 1931, 1943, 1955, 1967,1979, 1991, 2003

These individuals are elegant and creative, yet are timid and prefer anonymity. They are most compatible with Bears and Rabbits but not the Ox.

Page 39: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Monkey

1932, 1944, 1956, 1968,1980, 1992, 2004

These individuals are very intelligent and are able to influence people.Enthusiastic achievers, they are easily discouraged and confused. Theyshould avoid Tigers and seek out Dragons or Rats as mates.

Cock 1933, 1945, 1957, 1969,1981, 1993, 2005

These individuals have pioneer spirits. They are devoted to work and quest after knowledge. They can be selfish and eccentric. Rabbits are troubles while Snakes and Ox are fine

Page 40: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Constellation

Planet Dates Personality Characteristics

Capricorn Saturn 12/21-1/20

Ambition, caution, work

Aquarius Uranus 1/21-2/19

Humane, unconventional, high and low spirits

Pisces Neptune

2/20-3/20

Inspiration, easily influenced, dreaming

Aries Mars 3/21-4/20

Impulsiveness, adventure, disputes

Taurus Venus 4/21-5/21

Endurance, obstinate, labor

Gemini Mercury

5/22-6/21

Skill, versatility, good relationships

Cancer Moon 6/22-7/23

Appreciates home life, imagination, indecision

Leo Sun 7/24-8/23

Generality, pride, desire for power

Virgo Mercury

8/24-9/23

Analytical, studious, modest

Libra Venus 9/24-10/23

Justice, artistic sense, sensitivity

Scorpio Mars 10/24-11/22

Critical sense, secrecy, fights

Sagittarius

Jupiter 11/23-12/20

Idealism, open-mindedness, mobility

Page 41: Psych 24 history of personality assessment

Autobiography• Family background/ Genogram (describe

emotional lines)– Socioecomic level, parent occupation, emotional history,

cultural background, parent’s current health, family relationship, urban rural upbringing

• Personal History– Infancy, early and middle adulthood, medical history,

toilet training, life changes

• Miscellaneous– Somatic concerns, self-concept (like/dislike)

happiest/saddest memory, fears