PSFC Library - Introduction to Fusion Energy · 2013. 1. 25. · nuclear energy •A huge amount of...
Transcript of PSFC Library - Introduction to Fusion Energy · 2013. 1. 25. · nuclear energy •A huge amount of...
Introduction to Fusion Energy
Jerry Hughes
IAP @ PSFC
January 8, 2013
Acknowledgments: Catherine Fiore, Jeff Freidberg, Martin Greenwald, Zach Hartwig, Alberto Loarte,
Bob Mumgaard, Geoff Olynyk
Presenter’s e-mail: [email protected]
Questions to answer
• What is fusion?
• Why do we need it?
• How do we get it on earth?
• Where do we stand?
• Where are we headed?
What is fusion, anyway?
What is fusion, anyway?
What is fusion, anyway?
What is fusion, anyway?
Fusion is a form of nuclear energy
• A huge amount of energy
is released when isotopes
lighter than iron combine
to form heavier nuclei,
with less final mass
• It is an ubiquitous energy source in the universe
• It is not (yet) a practical energy source on earth
2mcE
Fusion is a form of nuclear energy
• A huge amount of energy
is released when isotopes
lighter than iron combine
to form heavier nuclei,
with less final mass
• It is an ubiquitous energy source in the universe
• It is not (yet) a practical energy source on earth
2mcE
Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars
Supernova produces radioactive elements
Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric
circulation, water cycle
Sun illuminates
Earth
Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars
Geothermal
Nuclear fission
Decay of radioactive particles generates
heat in Earth’s interior
Supernova produces radioactive elements Splitting radioactive
particles generates heat
Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric
circulation, water cycle
Sun illuminates
Earth
Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars
Geothermal
Nuclear fission
Decay of radioactive particles generates
heat in Earth’s interior
Supernova produces radioactive elements Splitting radioactive
particles generates heat Wind
Hydroelectric Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric
circulation, water cycle
Running water turns
turbines
Atmospheric circulation
turns turbines
Sun illuminates
Earth
Terrestrial energy sources have their origin in the nuclear fusion reactions of stars
Geothermal
Nuclear fission
Decay of radioactive particles generates
heat in Earth’s interior
Supernova produces radioactive elements Splitting radioactive
particles generates heat Wind
Hydroelectric Solar heating of the Earth drives atmospheric
circulation, water cycle
Running water turns
turbines
Atmospheric circulation
turns turbines
Sun illuminates
Earth
Absorption of light for electricity generation
Solar
Photosynthesis generation of biomass
Burn ‘em
Biomass
Fossil fuels
What are the prospects for nuclear fusion on Earth?
• Scientists demonstrated its use as a weapon in 1952
• For 50 years, scientists and engineers have been working create controlled nuclear fusion in the laboratory in order to exploit the fusion reaction as a practical energy source.
BOMB =
What are the prospects for nuclear fusion on Earth?
• Scientists demonstrated its use as a weapon in 1952
• For over 60 years, scientists and engineers have been working create controlled nuclear fusion in the laboratory in order to exploit the fusion reaction as a practical energy source.
BOMB =
REACTOR =
Why do we need fusion?
Earth-dwellers want to consume more energy . . .
. . . a lot more
18
What Are The World’s Energy Options?
Nothing obviously easy
● Burning fossil fuels (currently 80%) even if there was enough,
must contend with climate change + pollution: is large-scale CO2
capture and storage feasible?
● Nuclear fission – safety, proliferation concerns (but cannot avoid if
we are serious about reducing fossil fuel burning; at least until
fusion available)
● Biofuels – can this be made carbon neutral? Land and water use
issues
● Solar - need breakthroughs in production and storage
● Wind, Tidal – storage and land use issues, but could fill niche
19
Pros and Cons of Fusion
Pros
• Abundant, high energy density fuel (D + Li)
• No greenhouse gases (nor NOX, SOX, particulate emission)
• Safe – no chain reaction, ~1 sec worth of fuel in device at any one time
• Minimal “afterheat”, no nuclear meltdown possible
• Residual radioactivity small; products immobile and short-lived
• Minimal proliferation risks
• Minimal land and water use
• No seasonal, diurnal or regional variation – no energy storage issue
Cons
• It doesn’t work yet (turns out to be a really hard problem)
• Capital costs will be high, unit size large (but with low operating costs)
Fusion, like all nuclear energy, produces a tremendous amount of energy from a very small mass of reactants.
7
• Typical energy scales for chemical bonds – electron-volts (eV)
• Typical energy scales for nuclear reactions – millions of electron-volts (MeV) (E=mc2)
• This means that a gigawatt-class fusion power plant will use about a pickup truck full of fuel (lithium and deuterium) per year.
• Compare to a 1 GWe coal plant – nearly 8,000 tons of coal per day!
3 days worth of coal supply for a 500 MWe plant
Fusion plants would have reduced environmental impact relative to many renewables
27
Wind, Solar, Hydro: substantial changes to the landscape needed to generate the first gigawatt Wind, Solar: lacking an energy storage solution
How do we get controlled nuclear fusion on Earth?
Back to the Future (“Mr. Fusion”)
We’re not quite to this point yet . . .
Spider-Man II
SPF 35,000,000,000, anyone?
How do we really get controlled nuclear fusion on Earth?
Two types of nuclear reactions:
• Fission – split heavy nuclei
• (e.g. Uranium)
• Fusion – fuse light nuclei
• (e.g. hydrogenic isotopes)
26
The most energetically favorable fusion reaction is between deuterium (D) and tritium (T)
D + T → He + n + 17.6 MeV
27
• Neutron : 0n1
80 % of reaction energy
==> Not Confined
==> Energy output and
tritium production
•Alpha particle : 2He4
20 % of reaction energy
==> Confined
==> Plasma Self Heating
Fuel Supply - Fusion • Plenty of D from the ocean • No natural T – half life = 12 years • Need to breed T in the reactor
Li-6 + n → He + T + 4.8 MeV • Li-6 is 7% of natural lithium • 1000’s of years of natural lithium
28
Fuel for a fusion power plant:
30 t/day seawater (extract deuterium)
350 kg/yr lithium (breed to tritium)
Problem: Nuclei do not play well together
29
+ +
• Like charges repel (Coulomb force)
• Throw them at each other and they tend to scatter
• Huge energies are needed to overcome this repulsive force
Problem: Nuclei do not play well together
• Like charges repel (Coulomb force)
• Throw them at each other and they tend to scatter
• Huge energies are needed to overcome this repulsive force 30
+
+
31
The Probability Of D-T Fusion Is The Greatest When The Nuclei Have About
100 Kev Of Kinetic Energy
• Even at the optimum energy,
the nuclei are much more
likely to scatter elastically
than to fuse!
• Therefore, nuclei must be confined over numerous scattering times this puts the fuel into a thermodynamic equilibrium
• Significant fusion rate requires fuel to be confined at >100 million degrees!
At the high temperatures required for the fusion reaction, the deuterium and tritium are in the plasma state.
10
• When energy is added to matter, phase changes can occur new physical properties.
• When sufficient heat energy is added to matter, bound electrons strip from the nuclei
• Plasma = “soup” of negatively charged electrons and positively charged nuclei.
Add heat
At the high temperatures required for the fusion reaction, the deuterium and tritium are in the plasma state.
10
• When energy is added to matter, phase changes can occur new physical properties.
• When sufficient heat energy is added to matter, bound electrons strip from the nuclei
• Plasma = “soup” of negatively charged electrons and positively charged nuclei.
Solid / liquid / gas Plasma
Neutron
Proton
Add heat
e– e–
e–
e–
At the high temperatures required for the fusion reaction, the deuterium and tritium are in the plasma state.
10
• When energy is added to matter, phase changes can occur new physical properties.
• When sufficient heat energy is added to matter, bound electrons strip from the nuclei
• Plasma = “soup” of negatively charged electrons and positively charged nuclei.
Solid / liquid / gas Plasma
Neutron
Proton
Add heat
e– e–
e–
e–
In plasma physics, we measure temperature in eV, where 1 eV = 11,600 K
Typical fusion plasma temp = 10 keV 100 million degrees
35
Most of the visible universe is composed of plasma
. . . not all of it is fusing
36
High confinement is needed for plasma fusion
• Our goal: get the required temperature with the least amount of heating power
• Energy confinement time is the ratio of stored energy to heating rate.
• In a fusion reactor that heat would come from the fast a particles (charged, so they are confined by the magnetic field)
ETotal stored energy Joules
Heating rate Watts(sec)
( )
( )
“Fuse it or lose it.”
Conditions needed for a self-sustaining fusion plasma
• We need enough plasma: (air/100,000)
• At a high enough temperature: (air x million)
• Holding its heat for a long enough time:
• For a sustained fusion plasma – Lawson Criterion
37
20 310n m
15T keV
2 sec
8 secp atmn T τE ≥ 3x1021
[keV s m−3]
38
Lithium
compound
A complete power plant will need to satisfy Lawson criterion, breed tritium and collect heat to drive turbines
to actually make electricity and put it on the grid.
How do we hold together a hot dense plasma?
40
Approaches To Fusion Energy
• Gravitational Confinement (300 W/m3) – In a deep gravitational well, even fast
particles are trapped.
– Very slow: E ~ 106 years, burn-up time = 1010 years
● Inertial Confinement (1028 W/m3)
– Heat and compress plasma to ignite plasma
before constituents fly apart.
– Like a little H-bomb
– Capsules would need to be burned with high
gain, high rep rate for reactor practicality
● Magnetic Confinement (107 W/m3)
– Uses the unique properties of ionized
particles in a magnetic field
41
Gyro-radius
Gyro-frequency
Gyro-motion Of Charged Particles Enables Magnetic Confinement, perpendicular to B-field
At B = 5T, T = 10keV
• e = 0.067 mm
• i = 2.9 mm
• R/ i > 1,000
• e = 8.8 x 1011 rad/sec (mwaves)
• i = 4.8 x 108 rad/sec (FM radio)
Ionized particles are deflected by the Lorentz force and bent into circular orbits.
mV c mT
qB B
c
eB
mc
What about the ends?
42
● At the temperatures involved, ions are moving at over 1,000 km/s
● For a practical device, the end losses must be eliminated
43
Close the ends, and . . .
“Donuts. Is there anything they can’t do?” --H. Simpson
. . . toroidal confinement is born
44
Magnetic Confinement In Toroidal Devices
• Solution 1: Torus solves the end-loss problem
• Problem 2: In a simple toroidal field, particle drifts lead to charge separation
B B
Bt
Bp
Bt
Bp
Jt
Bz
● Solution 2: Add poloidal field, particles sample regions of inward and outward drift.
● Problem 3: Hoop stress from unequal magnetic and kinetic pressures.
● Solution 3: Add vertical field, to counteract hoop stress.
● Magnetic confinement experiments are variations on this theme.
Bt E EB drift
Hoop Stress
45
Two Promising Strategies To Create This Configuration
● Poloidal field from current in the
plasma itself.
● Axisymmetric – good
confinement
● Current is source of instability
● Poloidal field from external coils
● Intrinsically steady-state
● Non-axisymmetric – good
confinement hard to achieve
● More difficult to build
Tokamak Stellarator
Poloidal magnetic field coil
Central solenoid
Toroidal magnetic field coil
Poloidal magnetic field
Plasma current
Toroidal magnetic field
What makes a tokamak?
14
Toroidal magnetic fields coils to create the primary toroidal confinement field
Central solenoid coils to create toroidal plasma current for secondary poloidal confinement field
Poloidal magnetic fields coils to create fields for plasma control and shaping
What makes a tokamak?
14
Toroidal magnetic fields coils to create the primary toroidal confinement field
Central solenoid coils to create toroidal plasma current for secondary poloidal confinement field
Poloidal magnetic fields coils to create fields for plasma control and shaping Helical field lines associated with a tokamak plasma
48
Plasma Is Confined On Closed Nested Flux Surfaces
• Magnetic field lines are helical and lie on closed, nested surfaces – flux surfaces, Y = const.
• To lowest order, particles are “stuck” on flux surfaces
• Confinement should be great!
How is the tokamak doing?
50
Steady progress has been made towards demonstrating fusion, particularly with tokamaks
51
Steady progress has been made towards demonstrating fusion, particularly with tokamaks
ITER (2027?)
• The ratio of fusion power produced to plasma heating power supplied is defined as capital Q: Q=1 Breakeven Q=∞ Ignition (no external heating)
𝑄 =𝑃fusion𝑃heating
Turbulence is rampant in high energy plasmas, degrading confinement
15
• Early calculations made overoptimistic predictions of tokamak confinement
• Turbulence was not taken into account!
• Turbulent eddies carry heat and particles out of the plasma hundreds of times faster than random collisions alone would
One frame of a simulation of turbulence in the DIII-D using GYRO (J. Candy, General Atomics)
53
Go large: ITER
54
Go large: ITER
● Plasma major radius = 6.2m
(twice the size of JET,
currently the world’s largest
tokamak)
● Plasma volume = 840 m3
● Fusion power 500 MWt
(with auxiliary power of
~50MW)
The ITER Mission: Demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy
20
ITER construction site on Sept. 17, 2012 near Vinon-sur-Verdon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France
Tokamak Assembly Hall
Headquarters (500 staff)
Tokamak Seismic Isolation Pit
Rendering of ITER tokamak plus cryostat
Cadarache
• Joint effort among China, EU, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, US
• Political origin: 1985 Geneva summit • ITER agreement reached in 2006 • Construction began in 2010 in France • Construction cost > €10B • First plasma: 2020 • D-T operations: 2027
Fusion experiments around the world today are conducting research in support of ITER’s mission.
5
Alcator C-Mod Cambridge, MA, USA
DIII-D, San Diego, CA, USA
ASDEX Upgade Garching, Germany
EAST (HT-7) Hefei, Anhui, China
Joint European Torus (JET) Culham, Oxfordshire, UK
JT-60SA (under construction) Naka, Japan
KSTAR, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
SST-1, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Tore Supra, Cadarache, France
Across the street is a real live tokamak
• C-Mod is a compact device with some pretty hefty parameters
– Magnetic field at the plasma
center up to 8T (>100,000 x Earth’s surface magnetic field)
– Plasma densities span the range expected for reactors
– Volume averaged plasma pressure of 2 atmospheres (world record)
– Heat flux exhaust as high as 0.5GW/m2
Alcator C-Mod
Alcator C-Mod Tour: Thursday 1/10 @1:30pm
What you won’t see on the tour Armored Inner Column
RF Wave-Based Heating Sources
(Current Drive Launcher not in view)
Power handling divertor
Molybdenum Protection Tiles (Tmelt = 2623⁰C
Examples of R&D on existing tokamaks like C-Mod
ITER and reactors will have to cope with heat exhaust
• 20% of fusion power is used to re-heat the core (a particles)
• This must either be radiated away or conducted to the divertor plates
• Must observe material limits of 10MW/m2
Radiant power + neutrons
Heat flowing to divertor
The consequences of excessive local heat flux on surfaces can be severe
Tiles removed following high power C-Mod operation
Controlled impurity injection is a way to mitigate heat loads
• Excess thermal radiation in core plasma reduces temperature, fusion performance
• Instead, localize radiation to the edge
No
rmal
ized
co
nfi
nem
ent
Fraction of power reaching outer divertor
Regulation of edge profiles is an important issue
• ITER requires an edge transport barrier to achieve desired performance (Q=10)
• Barrier is self-regulating – Large pressure gradient in
edge drives “bootstrap current”
– Combined, these lead to plasma instabilities that limit the attainable edge pressure
– Result is usually a regular ejection of hot plasma into the periphery
Projections indicate that the ITER edge would be regulated to nearly 100 kPa – likely sufficient for its mission
• Edge-regulating instabilities also help expel unwanted impurities from core
– Helium ash
– Slightly heavier nuclei introduced into the edge for heat load control (neon, argon)
– Even heavier nuclei from the wall (tungsten)
• Core impurities dilute the fuel and lead to increased bremsstrahlung radiation losses
• BUT:
• Each discrete burst in ITER (at about 1Hz) would dump about 1MJ of energy into the divertor
• Need to mitigate these!
• Edge-regulating instabilities also help expel unwanted impurities from core
– Helium ash
– Slightly heavier nuclei introduced into the edge for heat load control (neon, argon)
– Even heavier nuclei from the wall (tungsten)
• Core impurities dilute the fuel and lead to increased bremsstrahlung radiation losses
• BUT:
• Each discrete burst in ITER (at about 1Hz) would dump about 1MJ of energy into the divertor
• Need to mitigate these!
• High performance plasma operation possible without density/impurity buildup
• Edge profiles regulated by naturally occurring turbulence
• “I-mode”: A major breakthrough that rivals the discovery of the edge transport barrier in 1982
What lies in fusion’s future?
The path to an economic tokamak fusion reactor requires solving several remaining physics and technology problems.
● Very large, high-field, superconducting magnets needed
– Mechanical and thermal stresses
– Proximity to high neutron flux
● First wall material Issues
▫ Power handling
▫ Erosion – high energy and particle fluxes
▫ No tritium retention
● Must close fuel cycle by keeping tritium breeding ratio above 1
● Steady state operation means we need non-inductive sources of current
● Auxiliary heating
● Disruption prediction and mitigation
● Ease of maintenance – high availability required
The current path to a reactor could put fusion energy on the grid during the 21st century
19
ITER online 2020’s
“DEMO” 2045?
Commercial plants 2060?
Existing tokamak experiments in USA, EU, Japan, China, India, Korea, etc. work on technical challenges.
JET
EAST
ASDEX-U
DIII-D
C-Mod JT-60SA
Tore Supra
SST-1 KSTAR
IFMIF (Europe)
FNSF/FDF/Pilot (USA)
Demonstrate the scientific and technological basis of magnetic fusion energy
Parallel facilities to research wall materials for 14.1 MeV fusion neutron environment
72
Stellerator research also remains active
W7-X
LHD
Recent developments in superconductor technology mean that the path to a reactor could be faster than originally envisioned.
22
The “Vulcan” concept – developed by 22.63 class at MIT in 2010, published as 5 papers
Double-walled replaceable vacuum vessel
Demountable high-temperature superconducting coils
High-field-side high-efficiency current drive
10
100
1000
10000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Applied Field (T)
JE
(A/m
m²)
YBCO B|| Tape Plane
YBCO B Tape Plane
2212
RRP Nb3Sn
Bronze Nb3Sn
MgB2
Nb-Ti
Figu
re c
ou
rtes
y o
f N
atio
nal
Hig
h M
agn
etic
Fie
ld L
abo
rato
ry
Engineering critical current-density at 4.2K
ITER
Nb3Sn (ITER) is brittle, so
coils are baked after
winding
YBCO and Nb-Ti just need
to be wound
New developments in superconductor technology mean a
smaller, more maintainable fusion
reactor than the ITER-like reactor
that was previously envisioned.
There are many uncertainties, but projections show fusion can be cost competitive with other sources of electricity
23
• A number of studies using systems codes have been carried out to assess the cost of electricity (CoE) with magnetic fusion
• While CoE from the first demonstration power plant (known as “DEMO”) are high, estimates for a mature fusion power plant come in at 6.6 ¢/kWh, comparable to competing technologies.
• Factored in engineering, safety, operating costs, maintenance, dismantle/disposal, etc.
• Economic case for fusion becomes stronger if carbon emission becomes more expensive. Fusion makes no direct emissions of any kind. (CO2, SOX, NOX, etc.)
75
Summary
● Fusion holds out the possibility of a safe, environmentally benign
power source
● The science and technology are extremely challenging
● But… steady progress has been made
● We’re poised to take a major step, an experiment to demonstrate
the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy
● A path forward to fusion exists, and there will be plenty of
scientific and engineering opportunities along the way
Conclusion: Fusion energy is critical research that will help humanity meet its energy needs in the future.
29
“The days of inexpensive, convenient, abundant energy sources are quickly drawing to a close … We must act now to develop the technology and infrastructure necessary to transition to other energy sources. Policy changes, leap-ahead technology breakthroughs, cultural changes, and significant investment are requisite for this new energy future. Time is essential to enact these changes. The process should begin now.”
— U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, 2006.
Fusion energy was selected by the National Academy of Engineering as one of the 14 Grand Engineering Challenges to improve humanity’s lot in the 21st century.
— See http://www.engineeringchallenges.org