UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2012

IEEE PSESEnergy Efficiency Landscape

Tom JulianoJanuary 22, 2013

San Jose, CA

Agenda

Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency

Specific HT Product Trends

Updates and Developments of EnergyEfficiency Regulations

Policy Harmonization

Data Center & Cloud Computing Activities

2

Consumer Electronics fueling increased demand in Global Energy

3

Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency

$0.00

$20.00

$40.00

$60.00

$80.00

$100.00

$120.00

1946

1949

1952

1955

1958

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Nominal Oil Price ($/bbl.)Inflation Adjusted Oil Price ($/bbl.)

4

Resources：inflationdata.com

1. Energy Conservation1979 - World Energy Council defined it because of the 1970s energy crisis

A.D.1979

A.D.1973

2. Energy Efficiency1995 - World Energy Council defined it encompasses all changes that result in decreasing the amount of energy used to produce one unit of economic activity2007 - G8 discuss EU proposal with International Energy Agency.2008 - International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation

The Energy Saving Certifications Trend High-Tech Products

5

ServersData Center Storage

UPS

User Interfaces

Network equipment

Computers

Mobile phone

Slate device

Displays

TV

Power Supplies

Battery Chargers

Going Green is Going Global

6

Americas• Canada / Natural Resources Canada• US EPA / ENERGY STAR• US Department of Energy• US California Energy Commission• US MSAC (Multiple-State Appliance Standards Collaborative)• COMISIÓN NACIONAL PARA EL USO EFICIENTE DE LA ENERGÍA &Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor

Europe• EU / ErP Directive

Asia• China / China Standard Certification Center• Japan / METI / Top Runner Program• Korea / MKE & KEMCO / e-Standby program• India / Bureau of Energy Efficiency• Taiwan / BOE & MOEA / Energy Label• AU & NZ /E3 committee / Minimum Energy Performance Standard•Vietnam - MEPS

7

USEPA / ENERGY STAR

Televisions

Displays

Computers

Audio/Video

Set-Top Boxes

UPS

Servers

Data Center

Storage

8

9

ENERGY STAR ® High Tech Regulated Products

Home Electronics/Office Equipment Current Version In Development

Battery Charging Systems 1.1 2.0 (within one week of DOE final rule)

Telephony 2.2 3.0 (test method finalized November 2012)

Audio/Video Equipment 2.1 3.0 (published and effective May 1, 2013)

Set-top Boxes 3.0 4.1 (under review and not effective July 1, 2013)

Televisions 6.0 6.0 (published and effective June 1, 2013)

Computers 5.2 6.0 (finalized September 10, 2012)

Imaging Equipment 1.2 2.0 (finalized December 2012; effective September 2013)

Computer Servers 1.1 2.0 (finalized November 9, 2012)

Displays 6.0 6.0 (published and effective June 1, 2013)

Small Network Equipment N/A 1.0 (effective March 2013)

Data Center Storage N/A 1.0 (finalized October 2012; effective January 2013)

Uninterruptible Power Supplies 1.0 1.0 (published and effective August 1, 2012)

Large Network Equipment N/A Q1’14 specification final, effective

ENERGY STAR TV Specifications

Effective immediately, manufacturers may elect to have their Certification Body (CB) certify their eligible products to the Version 6.0 requirement.

After January 15, 2013, CBs will be instructed to stop certifying newproduct submittals to Version 5.3.

The effective date (date of manufacture) for ENERGY STAR Television Specification V 6.0 is June 1, 2013.

10

Reduction of On-Mode Power Consumption in HDTV

11

ENERGY STAR Display Specifications

Effective immediately, manufacturers may elect to have their Certification Body (CB) certify their eligible products to the Version 6.0 requirement.

After January 15, 2013, CBs will be instructed to stop certifying newproduct submittals to Version 5.1.

The effective date (date of manufacture) for ENERGY STAR Display Specification V 6.0 is June 1, 2013.

12

USDepartment of Energy

Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies (BCEPS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

NOPR：Doc. No.: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005

May 2, 2012

Attendants：approximately 80 stakeholders

UL is the only third party certification body to attend.

Final Rule: 2012-2013 (Current estimate July 1, 2013);

Comments provided before May 25, 2012;

Estimated effective dates:

EPS - two years after Final Ruling

Battery Chargers - TBD 13

Battery Chargers NOPR

Product Class

I/O Type BatteryEnergy

Special Characteristic or Battery Voltage

Maximum UEC(kWh/yr) Applications Examined

ID Description

1 Low Energy, Inductive

AC In, DC Out

< 100 Wh

Inductive Connection 3.04 Toothbrushes

2 Low Energy, Low Voltage < 4V = 0.2095(Ebatt) + 5.87Mobile Phones, Cordless

Phones, Power Tools, Digital Cameras

3 Low Energy, Medium Voltage 4 – 10 V For Ebatt < 9.74 Wh, = 4.68For Ebatt ≥ 9.74 Wh, = 0.0933(Ebatt) + 3.77

Power Tools

4 Low Energy, High Voltage > 10 V For Ebatt < 9.71 Wh, = 9.03For Ebatt ≥ 9.71 Wh, = 0.2411(Ebatt) + 6.69

Power Tools and Notebook Computers

5 Medium Energy, Low Voltage

100-3000 Wh

< 20 V For Ebatt < 355.18 Wh, = 20.06For Ebatt ≥ 355.18 Wh, = 0.0219(Ebatt) + 12.28

Marine Chargers

6 Medium Energy, High Voltage ≥ 20 V For Ebatt < 239.48 Wh, = 30.37For Ebatt ≥ 239.48 Wh, = 0.0495(Ebatt) + 18.51

Lawn mowers, Wheelchairs

7 High Energy > 3000 Wh -- = 0.502(Ebatt) + 4.53 Golf Cars

8 Low Energy, Low Voltage DC InputDC In,DC Out

-- < 9 V Input 0.66 Mp3 Players

9 Low Energy, High Voltage DC Input -- ≥ 9 V Input No Standard GPS

10a

AC output AC In,AC Out

-- Without AVR For Ebatt < 37.2 Wh, = 2.54For Ebatt ≥ 37.2 Wh, = 0.0733(Ebatt) – 0.18

UPS

10b -- With AVR For Ebatt < 37.2 Wh, = 6.18For Ebatt ≥ 37.2 Wh, = 0.0733(Ebatt) + 3.45

--

14

Test method：Appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430 – Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of Battery Chargers

Battery Chargers NOPR

15

USCalifornia Energy Commission

Personal Computers (Proposal)

Electronic Displays (Proposal)

Battery Charger Systems(Revision)

16http://www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/

CEC Battery Charger System (BCS) Regulations

• On January 12, 2012, the CEC approved a new Energy Efficiency standard for Battery Chargers used to power cell phones, laptop computers, power tools, and other battery powered devices.

• To the date there are an estimated 170 million chargers in California (11 battery chargers per household) and energy consumed to charge batteries is increasing.

• Have been estimated that once new standard will be fully implemented, California will save $300 million/year and eliminate 1 million metric tons of carbon emissions.

17

CA Energy Commissionhttp://www.energy.ca.

gov/appliances/

Battery Charger Systems (BCS)

18

Power Supply

Charge ControlCircuitry

Battery Charger

Battery Charger System

Battery

End Use

Utility

Defined as a battery charger coupled with its battery (or batteries) battery chargers coupled with their batteries, which together are referred to as battery charger systems.

This term covers all rechargeable batteries or devices incorporating a rechargeable battery and the chargers used with them.

Battery Charger Systems: Effective Dates

19

Exception:1. Motor vehicle*2. Medical device*3. Exit sign4. Three phase input*5. Analyzers6. VI, VFI UPS

Large Battery Charger Systems

Effective 2014-01-01

Small Battery Charger Systems

InputPower(2 kW)

Consumer

Non-consumerCommercial

Effective2017-01-01

B2B

Non USB charger

Effective 2013-02-01

USB charger

Less than

Effective 2013-02-01

More than

Effective 2014-01-01

20Wh

CEC BCS Regulations

Requirements:

1. Testing;

2. Compliance with minimum efficiency standards;

3. Certification; and

4. Labeling and/or marking

20

Testing for Small BCSs

10 CFR Section 430.23(aa) (Appendix Y to Subpart B of Part 430) (2011).

• UUT preparing

Battery Selection

Battery Conditioning1. Charge mode & Battery maintenance mode test

Determining the charge/maintenance duration2. Battery discharge energy test3. Standby (No battery) mode energy consumption test4. Off mode energy consumption test

21

Battery Selection for Small BCSs

22

Charger Type TestsMulti-Voltage No

1Multi-Port No

Multi-Capacity No

Charger Type TestsMulti-Voltage No

2Multi-Port No

Multi-Capacity Yes

Battery Selection for Small BCSs

23

Charger Type TestsMulti-Voltage No

2Multi-Port Yes

Multi-CapacityYes or No

Charger Type TestsMulti-Voltage Yes

2Multi-Port No

Multi-Capacity No

Battery Selection for Small BCSs

24

Charger Type Tests

Multi-Voltage Yes

3Multi-Port Yes to either

orbothMulti-Capacity

Battery Conditioning for Small BCSs

Steps:

1) Fully CHARGED for duration specified in sections 5.2 in test procedure;

2) Fully DISCHARGED

3) Fully CHARGED again.

4) Fully DISCHARGED again.

5) Fully CHARGED again. No data need be recorded.

25

Certification

26

Certification: Appliance Efficiency Database

http://www.appliances.energy.ca.gov/QuickSearch.aspx

27

Labeling and/or marking

Legible and permanently affixed.

a) The product nameplate that houses the battery charging terminals, or

b) The retail packaging and, if included, the cover page of instructions.

28

BC

Market SurveillanceEnforcement:

1. industry “self‐policing”;

2. notice from other; and

3. results from the Energy Commission’s independent test laboratory.

Penalties:

Energy Commission to levy administrative civil penalties of $2,500 per violation.

29

Enforcement Testing• One unit selected for initial testing:

1. Performance is no worse than required by standards and is no worse than as certified by manufacturer; matter is closed.

2. Performance is worse than required by standard or is worse than as certified by manufacturer; second unit is procured and tested and the mean of the two results are calculated.

a) Performance of the mean results is no worse than required by standards and is no worse than as certified by manufacturer; matter is closed.

b) Performance is the mean results as required by standard but is worse than as certified by manufacturer; the Executive Director shall modify the listing of the appliance in the database.

c) Performance of the mean results is not as required by standard; the Executive Director shall remove the appliance from the database.

• Costs are borne by the Commission.

30

DoE & CEC Comparisons

31

Scope & Definition

Product Class1 ~ 10b,

(Consumer Products)

Small Battery Charger Systems

Large Battery Charger Systems

2 kW

Test methods

Appendix Y to Subpart B of

Part 430

Appendix Y to Subpart B of

Part 430

Energy Efficiency Battery Charger

System Test Procedure Version 2.2 dated

November 12, 2008

Criteria

UEC (Wh/yr)Unit Energy

Consumption

Table W-21. Max. 24 hour charge and maintenance energy (Wh)2. Maintenance Mode Power (W)3.No Battery Mode Power (W)

Table W-1

Mark

DoE

CEC

BC

BC

CanadaNatural Resources Canada

Canada Gazette, Part II, Amendment 11 is published and enter into force.

Regulations and test methods harmonization for external power supplies

32

http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/regulations/home_page.cfm?attr=0

NRCan: External Power Supplies (EPSs)

•No load: values obtained using the US test method are, in NRCan’sview, equivalent to the results using CSA-C381.1-08.

•Active mode: for products where results obtained using the US test method are more than .8 (>), above the minimum efficiency standard they are considered equivalent to the results using CSA-C381.1-08.

For products where results obtained using the US test method are within .8 (≤) of the minimum efficiency standard, they are notconsidered equivalent.

•Collaborative effort where outside third-party certifiers assisted NRCan with testing 10 random EPSs for their analysis of accepting the US test method.

Harmonization Activities

American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Formed the Energy Efficiency Standardization Coordination

Collaborative (EESCC) in September 2012

Five working groups were created:

1. Building energy and water assessment standards (including diagnostic test procedures and health and safety testing)

2. Systems energy modeling, integration, and communications3. Building energy rating and labeling4. Evaluation, measurement, and verification (encompassing

EM&V, energy performance metrics, and standardized and portable data collection and reporting)

5. Workforce credentialing (including standards for workforce training and certification programs, and workforce skills standards)

35

Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment (SEAD) Initiative

Launched in July 2010, SEAD is a multi-government global market transformation initiative that seeks to “pull” super-efficient appliances and equipment into the market by cooperating on measures such as manufacturer incentives and to “push” the most inefficient equipment out of the market by bolstering national minimum efficiency standards.

As the leading voluntary label for efficiency in the US, the ENERGY STAR program is active in individual product workgroups, including televisions and lighting – two globally traded products that together account for about 15 percent of household electricity use.

EPA is also engaged in recognition program being developed as well as the policy toolkit activities.

36

International Energy Agency (IEA) Efficient Electrical End-Use Equipment (4E)

In 2009, the International Energy Agency (IEA) Efficient Electrical End-Use Equipment (4E) program began its work on international harmonization of energy efficiency programs.

The 4E Implementing Agreement specifically focuses on electrical end-use equipment. Industrial, commercial, and consumer equipment is included within the program scope.

The objectives of the 4E Implementing Agreement is to promote the harmonization of international efforts to promote adoption of government policies to encourage the use of efficient electrical end-use equipment.

37

The US and the People’s Republic of China

China has announced a goal of reducing energy intensity 20 percent by 2015.

In support of this goal, EPA and the China Standard Certification Center (CSC) have agreed to begin voluntary work toward harmonizing energy-efficiency standards for a variety of products, including consumer electronics and office equipment.

38

Data Center & Cloud Computing Activities

The Trend

As awareness around global energy consumption continues to increase, coupled with worldwide IT spending growth and cloud services adoption and enablement, there is a strong demand for manufacturers to deliver better, faster, and more efficient ways to store, process, and serve data to their customers.

Servers manufacturers are rapidly developing and designing solutions for the data-hungry market.

There is an opportunity for manufacturers to take advantage and address the typical nameplate rating information and overstating vendor specifications (or even worse, understating), demonstrating state-of-the-art energy performance that can relate to TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP!

40

41

Energy Productivity

Illustrates EE gains from increased server utilization compared to traditional EE measures

Power Assure

A leading developer of Data Center Infrastructure and Energy Management software for large enterprises, government agencies and managed service providers.

Headquartered in Santa Clara, CA

Power Assures products provide intelligence and analytics to CIOs, IT directors and facility managers to optimize capacity, service levels and power consumption within and across data centers.

Power Assure developed a comprehensive metric for server energy efficiency called PAR4.

42

A comprehensive metric for server energy efficiency

43

•measures servers under maximum and no-load conditions to certify and rate equipment accurately

•provide a rating system to compare efficiency across multiple generations of equipment

•Label product with comparative efficiency for each year – past, present, future

PAR4 Rating

•4 Levels: Green (Most Efficient), Gold (Very Efficient), Silver (Fairly efficient), Black (Least Efficient)

•A larger PAR4 value equates to a higher energy efficiency•Every 100 point increase indicates a doubling of efficiency

How to use

•Reports four measurements•Off Mode•Idle•Loaded•At peak

Methodology

45

IEEE Power and Energy Society of Silicon Valley

Latest trends in Data Center Design, Technology, and Siting

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Dinner & Networking – 6:00 PMPresentation- 7:00 PM Santa Clara, CA

Speaker: KC Mares President & CEO, MegaWatt ConsultingRSVP: Registration required http:// ieeepesiasdata.eventbrite.com

46

Q&A

Thank You

Tom JulianoUL - Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

Global Business DevelopmentConsumer Products

thomas.j.julianojr@ul.com | 631.988.4113 | ul.com/hitech

Appendix

Battery Selection for Small BCSs

48

49

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (Hours)

Input

Powe

r (W

atts)

Maximum 24 hour charge and maintenance energy (Wh)

4 Hour Maintenance Mode Average Power (W)

Eb,Battery

Discharge Energy (Wh)

Compliance

Europe

50

ErP (formerly EuP) Process

Europe

ErP Directive falls under CE marking• Market is based on self-declaration• Typically a manufacturer would conduct required testing within theirown Lab.

Implementing measures currently in force:

51

Europe

52

Future HT Implementing Measures

AU/NZMinimum Energy Performance Standard, MEPS

Computers (Proposal)

Computer monitor (Proposal)

53

http://www.energyrating.gov.au/

IndiaStandard & Labeling Program

Computers (Notebook/Laptops)

Color TV

54

http://220.156.189.26:8080/beeLabel/index.jsp

BrazilComputers

Agency: The National Institute of Metrology,

Standardization and Industrial Quality, INMETRO

Updates & Developing: The decree is mandatory for

products to be sold to Brazilian public companies only.

Test method is same as US ENERGY STAR Program requirements Product Specification for Computers, version 5.0.

Estimate Schedule: Mandatory labeling effective on

2012-04-10.

55