Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis
-
Upload
charleston-conference -
Category
Technology
-
view
70 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis
![Page 1: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PROVING THE VALUE OF LIBRARY COLLECTIONS PART II:
An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis
Lea Currie, Head of Content Development, University of Kansas [email protected]
Amalia Monroe-Gulick, Strategy & Assessment Librarian, University of Kansas [email protected]
![Page 2: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project Objectives:
1. Prove the value of the KU Libraries by demonstrating that the Libraries provide access to the necessary resources that faculty use to conduct their research.
2. Identify weaknesses in the library collections that could be corrected
![Page 3: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Questions:
1. What formats are used by faculty?
2. Items available electronically, in print, or both?
3. What is the age of the cited items?
4. How are the cited journals purchased?
5. What are the most frequently cited publishers?
6. Do citation patterns vary among the disciplines?
![Page 4: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methodology:
1. Journal articles published 2005 to the present were used as parameters for inclusion in the analysis
2.Each citation was analyzed to record the following data:• Publisher
• Publication date
• Format (journal article, book, report, etc.)
• Call number
• KU availability
• Print access
• Electronic access
• Journal package access
• Aggregator database access
![Page 5: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: SCIENCES
![Page 6: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sciences: KU Access
EEB Geology Physics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Items Owned by KU (print and/or elec-tronic)
% Items Owned by KU (print only)
% Items Owned by KU (electronic only)
% Items Owned by KU (print and electronic duplication)
![Page 7: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sciences: No KU Access
EEB Geology Physics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Citations Not Owned by KU
% Citations Not Owned (Books)
% Citations Not Owned (Journal Articles)
![Page 8: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Sciences: Journal Citations
EEB Geology Physics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of Total Citations
% Journal Citations with Print or Electronic Cov-erage
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Electronic Coverage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Print Coverage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 9: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sciences: Electronic Journal Access
EEB Geology Physics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Journal Citations in a Journal Package
% Journal Citations in Aggregators
% Journal Citations in 1 Aggregator
% Journal Citations in 2 or more Aggregators
![Page 10: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Sciences: Book Citations
EEB Geology Physics0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Book Citations with Print or Electronic Coverage
% Book Citations with Electronic Coverage Only
% Book Citations with Print Coverage Only
% Book Citations Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 11: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: SOCIAL SCIENCES
![Page 12: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Social Sciences: KU Access
Economics Political Science Psychology0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Items Owned by KU (print and/or electronic)
% Items Owned by KU (print only)
% Items Owned by KU (electronic only)
% Items Owned by KU (print and electronic duplication)
![Page 13: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Social Sciences: No KU Access
Economics Political Science Psychology0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Citations Not Owned by KU
% Citations Not Owned (Books)
% Citations Not Owned (Journal Articles)
![Page 14: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Social Sciences: Journal Citations
Economics Political Science Psychology0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of Total Citations
% Journal Citations with Print or Electronic Coverage
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Electronic Coverage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Print Cov-erage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 15: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Social Sciences: Electronic Journal Access
Economics Political Science Psychology0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Journal Citations in a Journal Package
% Journal Citations in Aggregators
% Journal Citations in 1 Aggregator
% Journal Citations in 2 or more Aggregators
![Page 16: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Social Sciences: Book Citations
Economics Political Science Psychology0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Book Citations with Print or Electronic Coverage
% Book Citations with Electronic Coverage Only
% Book Citations with Print Coverage Only
% Book Citations Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 17: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: HUMANITIES
![Page 18: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Humanities: KU Access
Art History English Philosophy0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Citations Not Owned by KU
% Citations Not Owned (Books)
% Citations Not Owned (Journal Articles)
% Citations Not Owned (Works of art)
![Page 19: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Humanities: Journal Citations
Art History English Philosophy0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of Total Citations
% Journal Citations with Print or Electronic Coverage
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Electronic Coverage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned with Print Coverage Only
% Journal Citations KU Owned Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 20: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Humanities: Electronic Journal Access
Art History English Philosophy0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Journal Citations in a Journal Package
% Journal Citations in Aggregators
% Journal Citations in 1 Aggregator
% Journal Citations in 2 or more Aggregators
![Page 21: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Humanities: Book Citations
Art History English Philosophy0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% Book Citations with Print or Electronic Coverage
% Book Citations with Electronic Coverage Only
% Book Citations with Print Coverage Only
% Book Citations Electronic & Print Coverage (duplication)
![Page 22: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Discussion & Conclusions:• Overall, we provided 92% of the journals and 80% of the
books. • We provided 85% humanities, 89% social sciences, and 85%
of the sciences citations.• 52% overlap in print and electronic formats• 26% overlap in the humanities, 65% in the social sciences,
and 97% in the sciences.• 67% of the journals were in packages.• 38% in aggregator databases.• 1991 overall average publication date.• Some faculty cited little in their own disciplines.• Top publishers were Wiley-Blackwell, Elsevier, Oxford, and
Cambridge.
![Page 23: Proving the Value of Library Collections Part II: An Interdisciplinary Study Using Citation Analysis](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062513/556355bbd8b42a90698b590a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Questions?• Currie, Lea and Amalia Monroe-Gulick, “What do our
faculty use? An Interdisciplinary Citation Analysis Study,” Journal of Academic Librarianship (Available online, September 26, 2013).