Provider Notification
description
Transcript of Provider Notification
![Page 1: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Provider Notification Audit- Implications for Practice
Fiona Johnston, Outreach NurseRichard Williams, Lead Health Adviser
Western Sussex Hospitals Trust
![Page 2: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Provider Notification
• Definition
• Background
• Rationale
• Recording
• Audit
![Page 3: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Definition
The active process of a health care professional tracing a sexual contact is known as a ‘provider referral’
Manual for Sexual Health Advisers, 2004
![Page 4: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Rationale
Not offering an effective provider referral service will result in many people not being contacted and warned of the risk to their sexual health
Manual for Sexual Health Advisers, 2004
![Page 5: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background
• Contagious Diseases Acts, 1864-69• Emergency Regulation 33B, 1942• Tyneside scheme, 1937• Wakefield scheme, 1948• Pilot study at the London and St Thomas’ hospitals,
1964• National Health Service (VD) Regulations, 1968
• Handbook on Contact Tracing in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1980
![Page 6: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Recording provider notification
Index clinic number
Diagnosis Date Contact details Action Result Outcome
1 M11-1 C4 02/01/2011 Ashleigh, 18 yo, Worthing, Mob: 0780…
Phoned 03/01/11 tci 2/7 C405/01/11
New V
2 F11-20 B1 05/01/2011 Gary, 25 yo, Worthing, Mob: 0778…
Phoned 09/01/11 tci next week
I
3 M06-300 A1 08/01/2011 Sean, 35 yo, Worthing, Address…..
Letter sent 15/01/11 A231/01/11
New V
4 F08-2066 C4 13/01/2011 Dan, 22, Worthing, Mob: 0778...
Phoned 18/01/11number unobtainable
U
5 F11-400 C4 20/01/2011 Jack Jones, 18 yo, Worthing, Mob: 0778…
Already on database C402/01/11
Already Att V
![Page 7: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Audit – Infection and Numbers
• Chlamydia
• 60 provider referrals in 2010
![Page 8: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Audit
• How effective are health advisers at offering/obtaining provider referrals?
• Who is making the provider referrals?
• How effective are health advisers at securing attendances?
• Who is attending following a provider referral?
![Page 9: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Methodology
• Offering/obtaining provider referralsNumber of provider referralsTotal numbers diagnosed
= Provider referral rate (PRR)
• Source of provider referrals by age, sex, ethnicity
• Securing attendancesProvider Referral AttendancesNumbers eligible
= Provider referral attendance rate (PRAR)
• Attendances by age, sex, ethnicity
![Page 10: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Chlamydia Provider Referral Rate (PRR) - Total
Positive Diagnoses
Number of PRs
PRR
Total 365 60 0.16
![Page 11: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Chlamydia Provider Referral Rate (PRR) by Sex
Positive Diagnoses
Number of PRs
PRR
Male 193 20 0.10
Female 172 40 0.23
Total 365 60 0.16
![Page 12: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Chlamydia PRR by age range: Male
Number PRs PRR
16-19 24 4 0.16
20-24 87 9 0.10
25-34 60 6 0.10
35-44 17 1 0.05
45+ 5 0 -
Total 193 20 0.10
![Page 13: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Chlamydia PRs by age range: Female
Number PRs PRR
U16 3 - -
16-19 59 16 0.27
20-24 63 10 0.16
25-34 35 4 0.11
35-44 9 2 0.22
45+ 3 8 2.66
Total 172 40 0.23
![Page 14: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Chlamydia Provider Referral Attendance Rate (PRAR) - Total
PRs New V I Already Attended
V
U PRAR
Total 60 24 16 6 14 0.60 (24/40)
![Page 15: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Chlamydia Provider Referral Attendance Rate (PRAR) by Sex
Number of PRs
New V I Already Attended
V
U PRAR
Male 40 16 12 3 9 0.57 (16/28)
Female 20 8 4 3 5 0.60 (8/12)
Total 60 24 16 6 14 0.60 (24/40)
![Page 16: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Chlamydia PRAR by Age Range
• Inadequate data
![Page 17: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results
• Provider referral rate is 0.16
• Females make more provider referrals than males (0.1 M, 0.23 F)
• Most popular age range 16-19 (0.23 F, 0.16 M)
• Provider Referral Attendance Rate 0.6 (slightly higher for females (0.6) than males (0.57))
• Inadequate information available on ages of recipients of provider referral
![Page 18: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusion
• PR most popular for females (0.23)
• Age range 16-19 (0.27)
• Males have far lower PRR (0.10)
• PRAR is high for both males and females
![Page 19: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Discussion• Establish standards in provider referral
• Define standards
• Effects
• Focus on ‘breaking bad news’ to enhance partner referral (Coleman and Lohan, 2007)
• Develop adjuncts to partner referral (Trelle et al, 2007)
• Referrer and recipient views (Hogben et al, 2005; Pavlin et al, 2010)
![Page 20: Provider Notification](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/568144e8550346895db1b7e3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Recommendations
• Develop standards
• Audit – data collection to include recipient ages
• Enhance male provider referral
• Develop adjuncts for provider referral (posters, patient information leaflet)
• Patient satisfaction survey for provider referral recipients
• Enhance partner notification services (breaking ‘bad news’, partner materials, patient information leaflet)