PROPOSED TITLE: Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 ... · On behalf of Lagging Regions project1:...
Transcript of PROPOSED TITLE: Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 ... · On behalf of Lagging Regions project1:...
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 1 of 25
PROPOSED TITLE: Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university-to-industry interactions. On behalf of Lagging Regions project1: Mark Boden (lead author), Karel-Herman Haegeman, Elisabetta Marinelli,
Marina Ranga, Patrice Dos Santos.
On behalf of BRIDGES project: Charisios Achillas2, Thomas Bartzanas3, Ari Lainevuo4, Ninetta Chaniotou5.
Keywords: RIS3, lagging regions, driving university-to-industry interactions.
Abstract The formulation and subsequent implementation of national and regional research
and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3) provide the foundation for
the allocation of the 2014-2020 European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF)
across the EU6. However, the ability of regions across Europe to develop appropriate
strategies and effectively translate them into economic growth is highly
heterogeneous7.
Less developed regions, where growth is slow or at low levels, receive the majority
of the ESIF. Main obstacles to knowledge-based growth in such regions include the
lack of highly skilled human capital, the lack of a developed entrepreneurial culture,
and low levels of absorptive capacity. Also lacking is sustained engagement among
1 All authors from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
2 Centre for Research & Technology-Hellas/Institute for Research & Technology-Thessaly
3 Centre for Research & Technology-Hellas/Institute for Research & Technology-Thessaly
4 Regional Council of Helsinkl-Uusimaa
5 Kainuun Etu Oy
6 European Commission (2015) CONTRIBUTION OF THE EUROPEAN STRUCTURAL AND INVESTMENT FUNDS TO
THE 10 COMMISSION PRIORITIES JOBS, GROWTH AND INVESTMENTS, December 2015.
7 EC (22.6.2015) Bringing Europe's "lagging regions" up to speed, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-
2019/cretu/blog/bringing-europes-lagging-regions-speed_en, retrieved 30.11.2016.
EC (2015) Lagging regions initiative, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/how/improving-
investment/lagging_regions/, retrieved 30.11.2016.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 2 of 25
the quadruple helix of innovation stakeholders, particularly between industry and
those in academia.
The majority of SMEs, particularly in less developed regions, are micro-enterprises
with low capacity to dedicate resources to research and innovation and high
dependence on their regional innovation ecosystem. RIS3 strategies aim to better
engage SMEs in this ecosystem, thus increasing their innovation potential, with
improved access to both financial resources and human capital.
While smart specialisation implies an increasing focus on areas of strength, the
formulation and implementation of RIS3, centred on an effective Entrepreneurial
Discovery Process (EDP), can require the identification and subsequent exploitation
of potential for significant change. A shift towards more competitive more specialised
production may require regional stakeholders to pursue radical developments in
either product or processes or even both.
Such developments may require these "radical diversification regions" to commit to
university-to-industry interactions. The existence of an effective localised or at least
regionalised innovation "eco-system" within the region, facilitates the generation,
transfer and absorption of knowledge. However, while university-to-industry
partnerships are crucial for upscale path renewal, they have not been yet sufficiently
addressed by the RIS3 literature, and their enhanced understanding of their
structural role, particularly in the case of radical diversification regions, can inform
both academic and policy debates.
In this paper, we examine key aspects of how university-to-industry partnerships are
implemented in different European regional contexts, and aim at drawing conclusions
for measurably and sustainably improved effectiveness of RIS3 implementation. The
paper draws on evidence on such partnerships and approaches from two ongoing
closely complementary projects, namely the “BRIDGES” project and “Lagging
Regions” project.
BRIDGES project is an Interreg EUROPE project, aiming at improving the
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 3 of 25
effectiveness of RIS3 implementation in six regions: one innovation leader and five
moderate or modest innovators, all with bio-based industries as RIS3 priorities. RIS3
implementation relies on and reinforces the regional innovation system (RIS) in
which it functions. The project implementation process is conceived as a knowledge
spillover function in the space of six RIS, centred on bio-based industry sub-sectors
with relevant absorptive capacity for innovation, and focusing on three parametres:
the base of expertise (innovation infrastructures); university-to-industry interactions;
and critical mass issues eventually leading to inter-regional complementarity schemes
and funding tools.
For the modest and moderate innovators, the key independent variable for improving
RIS3 is the concentration of ongoing bio-based industries, with embeddedness, taken
as the starting point. For the innovation leader, the starting point is relatedness, in
terms of the proven potential of university-to-industry interactions. The focus is on
interactions leading to adding value to existing strengths (specialisation),
diversification from existing strengths into technologically related new ones, creation
of new industries (radical diversification), and problem solving in industries. The
target solution is the promotion of regionalised rather than strictly localised8
innovation eco systems reflected in university-to-industry investments, leading to
8 This classification is from as Asheim (Asheim 1998), Cooke (Cooke 1998), for example:
Main type of regional
innovation system
The location of knowledge
organisations
Knowledge
flow
Important stimulus for
cooperation
Territorially embedded regional innovation network
Locally, however, few relevant knowledge organisations
Interactive Geographical, social and cultural
proximity
Regional networked innovation systems
Locally, a strengthening of (the cooperation with) knowledge organisations
Interactive Planned, systemic networking
Regionalised national innovation systems
Mainly outside the region
More linear Individuals with the same education
and common experiences
Source: adapted from Asheim, Bjorn T and Isaksen, Arne (2002), Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local 'Sticky' and Global 'Ubiquitous' Knowledge (2002).
The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 27, Issue 1, p. 77-86 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1495495; page 11, Table 1:Some characteristics of three
main types of regional innovation systems.
Jaffe 1989 equation which introduces the spatial dimension [GC] into the knowledge production function I
=αIRDβ1 ∗UR
β2 ∗(UR ∗GC
β3 )∗ε (2).
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 4 of 25
path renewal in the modest and moderate innovators and enhanced specialisation in
the innovation leader region.
The "Lagging Regions" project of the European Commission's Joint Research
Centre implements, in cooperation with DG REGIO, two European Parliament
Preparatory Actions. The main aim is to support RIS3 implementation in a selection
of slow and low growth regions across Europe. At the core of this activity is sustained
stakeholder engagement, taking the EDP further forward towards the implementation
of specific project ideas. University-industry interactions are at the core of this
process. Working with nine regions, the project also examines selected horizontal
issues in the governance of the RIS3 process in the regions, as well as the mobility of
human resources and the role of transnational cooperation. It aims both to provide
concrete support to the selected regions, but also to generate wider lessons for other
lagging regions and to consider the policy implications.
While the two projects share the same basic aim of supporting the effective
implementation of RIS3 in selected less favoured regions, differing perspectives and
methodologies are adopted, which, together with the evidence from the various
European regions involved, providing a good basis for comparison.
With particular focus on university-to-industry interactions in each project context,
comparisons are made between the respective methodologies, the challenges arising
and the respective outcomes. Conclusions are then drawn in terms of contributions
to both the academic and policy debates on both RIS3 implementation and university
to industry interactions.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 5 of 25
JRC RIS3 Support in Lagging Regions, http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ris3-in-lagging-regions
References 1. References to the two projects
Lagging Regions project
Mark Boden, Patrice dos Santos, Karel Haegeman, Elisabetta Marinelli, Susana Valero (2016) Implementing RIS3
in the Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace: Towards a RIS3 tool box; JRC S3 Policy Brief Series, No. 20/2016
Mark Boden, Karel Haegeman, Elisabetta Marinelli, Patrice dos Santos, Susana Valero (2016) RIS3 support in
Lagging Regions, Iasi 7.6.2016, www.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
Mark Boden, Karel Haegeman, Elisabetta Marinelli, Patrice dos Santos, Susana Valero (2016) RIS3 support in
Lagging Regions, Bari, 11.7.2016, www.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
BRIDGES project
www.interregeurope.eu/bridges/
Jouni Ponnikas, Korneliusz Pylak, Christine Chang, Jenni Jäänheimo and Ninetta Chaniotou (2016) Improving the
effectiveness of RIS3 implementation: BRIDGES project case study; paper contributed to the 1st
SMART Conference, Seville, September 28th - 30th 2016.
2. Bibliography
Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and M. P. Feldman. (1991). “Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment.”
American Economic Review 82(1): 363–367.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 6 of 25
Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B. and Braunerhjelm, Pontus and Carlsson, Bo, (2004) The Missing
Link: The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth (December 2004). CEPR
Discussion Paper No. 4783.
ALEXANDER KLEIBRINK, CARLO GIANELLE & MATHIEU DOUSSINEAU (2016): Monitoring innovation and
territorial development in Europe: emergent strategic management, European Planning Studies, DOI:
10.1080/09654313.2016.1181717.
ALEXANDER KLEIBRINK, CARLO GIANELLE AND MATHIEU DOUSSINEAU (2016). Monitoring innovation and
territorial development in Europe: emergent strategic management, European Commission, Joint Research
Centre, Seville, Spain, EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1181717
Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. (1997) The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic
Localization of Innovation; Small Business Economics 9: 21–31.CrossRef
Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. (1997) The Localization of Ideas and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional
Networks; Working Paper, June.
ANDERSSON K. (2009) “Orchestrating regional development through projects: the ‘innovation paradox’ in
rural Finland”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(3), pp. 187–201.
ANDRÉS RODRÍGUEZ-POSE (2014) Leveraging research, science and innovation to strengthen social and
regional cohesion, Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE), EUROPEAN
COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A – Policy Development and
coordination Unit A6 – Science Policy, foresight and data.
ANDRÉS RODRÍGUEZ-POSE (2014) Leveraging research, science and innovation to strengthen social and
regional cohesion, Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE), Page 19
The neglect of demand-side conditions is particularly problematic in peripheral economies. … The Spanish
case is a useful exemplification of the ‘European innovation paradox’ – an emphasis on R&D (consistent
with the Lisbon Agenda) resulted in a significant increase in R&D expenditure that ultimately led to a
sizeable increase in scientific output and knowledge generation. This did not, however, yield increases in
innovative activity nor broader economic benefit.
ANDREW A. KING, KARIM R. LAKHANI (2011). The Contingent Effect of Absorptive Capacity:
An Open Innovation Analysis, Harvard University, Working Paper 11-102.
Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs. (1997). “Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and
High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422–448.CrossRef
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 7 of 25
Antonelli, C. (1994). “Technological Districts Localized Spillovers and Productivity Growth: The Italian
Evidence on Technological Externalities in the Core Regions,” International Review of Applied Economics:
pp. 18–30.
Antonelli, C. (1999). “Communication and Innovation: The Evidence Within Technological Districts.”
Working Paper, May.
ARNOUD LAGENDIJK & ANNE LORENTZEN (2007): Proximity, Knowledge and Innovation in Peripheral
Regions; European Planning Studies Vol. 15, No. 4, April 2007.
Arrow, K. (1962), Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in R. Nelson (ed.), The
Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan
Press.317.
Asheim, B. T. (2012) The Changing Role of earning Regions in the Globalising Knowledge Economy: A
Theoretical Re‐Examination’, Regional Studies, 46, 3 100.
Asheim, B. T. (2012) The Changing Role of earning Regions in the Globalising Knowledge Economy: A
Theoretical ReExamination’, Regional Studies, 46, 3 100.
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R. and Cooke, P. (2011) Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based
on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases’, Regional Studies, 45.
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R. and Cooke, P. (2011) Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based
on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases’, Regional Studies, 45.
Asheim, B., and Coenen, T. (2006). Contextualising Regional innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning
Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163-173.
Asheim, B., and Gertler, M. (2005). The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems, in: J
Fagerberg, D C. Mowery & R R Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 291-
Asheim, B.T. (1998), Learning Regions as Development Coalitions: Partnership as Governance in European
Workfare States? Paper presented at the Second European Urban and Regional Studies Conference on
’Culture, place and space in contemporary Europe’, University of Durham, UK, 17-20 September 1998.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 8 of 25
ASHEIM, B.T. (2007): Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems, The
European Journal of Social Science, 20, 223-241.
Asheim, B.T. and A. Isaksen (1997), Localisation, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards regional
Innovation Systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5, 3: 299-330.
Asheim, B.T. and G. Pedersen (1999), TESA - a development coalition within a learning region, in Ennals, R.
& B. Gustavsen (eds.), Work organisation and Europe as a development coalition. John Benjamin Publishing
Company, Amsterdam- Philadelphia (108-119).
Asheim, Bjorn T and Isaksen, Arne (2002), Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local 'Sticky'
and Global 'Ubiquitous' Knowledge (2002). The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 27, Issue 1, p. 77-86
2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1495495; page 11, Table 1:Some characteristics of
three main types of regional innovation systems.
Aslesen and Freel, M. (2012) Industrial Knowledge Bases as Drivers of Open Innovation ’, Industry
Innovation, 19, 563-584.
Aslesen and Freel, M. (2012) Industrial Knowledge Bases as Drivers of Open Innovation ’, Industry
Innovation, 19, 563-584.
Audretsch D. and E. Lehmann (2005). Does the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship hold for
regions?, Research Policy, 34, 1191-1202. (p1: “…linking investments in knowledge by universities and
regions to the amount of entrepreneurial activity associated with each university. … there is considerable
evidence suggesting that the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship holds for regions as well as
for industries.”)
Audretsch, D. (2004). Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship,
Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167-191.
Audretsch, D. B. (1995), Innovation and Industry Evolution (MIT Press, Cambridge). Audretsch, D. B. and
M. P. Feldman, (1996), R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic
Review 86(4): 253-273.
Audretsch, D. B., and M Vivarelli. (1994). “Small Firms and R&D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy.” Revue
d’Economie Industrielle 67: 225–237.CrossRef
Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. (1996a). “Innovative Clusters and the Industry Life Cycle.” Review of
Industrial Organization 11: 253–273.CrossRef
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 9 of 25
Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. (1996b). “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and
Production.” American Economic Review 86(3): 630–640.
Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. (1999). “Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization
and Localized Competition.” European Economic Review 43: 409–429.CrossRef
Audretsch, David B., & Feldman, Maryann P. (2003) Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of
Innovation, Prepared for the Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Volume 4 , revised May 9 2003.
Australia, B. (2006). An Australian Government Inititiative: Biotechnology Australia. Ausbiotech (2007).
About Biotechnology. Industry Overview. http://www.ausbiotech.org/content.asp?pageid=25
Autant-Bernard, C., and N. Massard. (1999). “Econométrie des extemalités technologiques locales et
géographie de l’innovation: une analyse critique.” Revue d’Economie Appliquée 52 (4): 35–68.
Badinger, H. & Tondl, G. (2002). Trade, Human Capital and Innovation: The Engines of European Regional
Growth in the 1990s. Vienna: Research Institute for European Affairs.
BARCA, F. (2009): An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting
European Union challenges and expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta
Hübner: Commissioner for Regional Policy.
Boschma R. A. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies39, 61-74.
BOSCHMA R. A. (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, Regional Studies39, 61-74.
BOSCHMA, R. & FRENKEN, K. 2011. Technological relatedness and regional branching. In: BATHELT,
BOSCHMA, R., NEFFKE, F. & HENNING, M. 2010. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness
and the development of new growth paths in regions. DRUID Summer Conference 2010. London, Imperial
College London Business School.
Boschma, R.A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A critical assessment, Regional Studies, 39 (1), 61-74.
Brian Libery and Moya Kneafsey (1998) Product and Place: Promoting Quality Products and Services in the
Lagging Rural Regions of the European Union, European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1998; vol. 5,
4: pp. 329-341.
Brusco, S. (1982). ‘The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration’, Cambridge
Journal of Economics, 6, 167-184.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 10 of 25
Brusco, S. and Righi, E. (1989). ‘Local Government, Industrial Policy and Social Consensus: the Case of
Modena (Italy)’, Economy and Society, 18(4), 405-424.
CAIRNCROSS, F. (2001): The Death of Distance 2.0: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our
Lives. New York: Harvard Business School.
CAMAGNI, R. (1991): Introduction: from the local 'milieu' to innovation through cooperation networks. In:
Camagni, R. (ed.): Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven Press.
Capello, R., Caragliu, A. and Nijkamp, P. (2010) “Territorial capital and regional growth: increasing returns
in local knowledge”, © 2010 The Authors. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie © 2010 Royal
Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, Volume 102, Issue 4, September 2011, Pages 385–405.
Cappelen, A., Castellacci, F., Fagerberg, J. & Verspagen, B. (2003) The Impact of EU Regional Support on
Growth and Convergence in the European Union; Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 621-644.
Caragliu Andrea and Nijkamp Peter (2010) The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge
spillovers: The Cohen and Levinthal model revisited. Journal of Applied Economics, Volume 44, 2012 - Issue
11, pages 1363 – 1374.
Carrincazeaux, C., Y. Lung, and A. Rallet. (1997). “De la localisation à l’organisation spatiale des activités de
recherche-développement des entreprises. Hypothèses théoriques et résultats empiriques dans le cas de la
France.” Presented at the Forty-sixth congrès de l’AFSE, Paris, September.
Cheynet, P., and M. Fadairo. (1998). “Les méthodes de mesure des externalités technologiques. Un aperçu
des travaux économétriques.” Working Paper, Programme CNRS Les enjeux économiques de l’innovation.
Cimon, Y. (2004). Knowledge-related asymmetries in strategic alliances. Journal of Knowledge
Management, 8(3), 17-30.
CLAIRE NAUWELAERS, KAREN MAGUIRE, GIULIA AJMONE MARSAN (2013): The Case of Helsinki-Tallinn
(Finland-Estonia) – Regions and Innovation: Collaborating Across Borders, OECD Regional Development
Working Papers 2013/19.
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective On Learning And Inno.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation
(Mar., 1990), pp. 128-152.
Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T. & Thisse, J.-F. (2008). Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and
Nations . Princeton: Princeton University.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 11 of 25
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS (2012) ‘A
European strategy for Key Enabling Technologies – A bridge to growth and jobs’; /* COM/2012/0341 final
*/
Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1994). The regional innovation system of Baden Württemberg, International
Journal of Technology Management, 9: 394-429.
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., Goio Etxebarria, G. (1997) Regional innovation systems: Institutional and
organis tional dimensions; Research Policy 26 (1997) 475-491.
Cooke, P. (1998), Introduction. Origins of the concept. In Braczyk, H.-J. et. al. (Eds.), Regional Innovation
Systems. UCL Press, London (2-25).
COOKE, P., HEIDENREICH, M. & BRACZYK, H.-J. 1998. Regional innovation systems the role of
governances in a globalized world, London, Routledge.
Cooke, P and De Laurentis, C. (2006). in Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., Tödtling, F., Trippl, M. Regional
Knowledge Economies: Markets, Innovation and Clusters, (Edward Elgar).
CRISTINA SERBANICA (2011): A Cause and Effect Analysis of University – Business Cooperation for
Regional Innovation in Romania, Theoretical and Applied EconomicsVolume XVIII (2011), No. 10(563), pp.
29-44
David B. Audretsch and Maryann P. Feldman (1996) R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and
Production; The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3 (Jun., 1996), pp. 630-640, American Economic
Association.
David B. Audretsch and Max Keilbach (2005) The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship, Indiana
University and the Division of Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy at the Max Planck Institute of
Economics, November 2005
Davidsson, P. and Delmar, F. (2001). Les entreprises à forte croissance et leur contribution à l'emploi: le
cas de la Suède 1987-1996. Revue Internationale PME, 14(3-4), 164-187.
Donato Iacobucci (2012) Developing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level:
some open questions, c.MET Working paper 15/2012 December 2012.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 12 of 25
Donato Iacobucci (2012) Developing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level:
some open questions; Paper presented at ERSA (European Regional Science Association) Annual Congress,
21‐25 August 2012, Bratislava.
Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., and Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. Sloan Management
Review, 42(4), 37-43.
Education and Training, 46 (8/9), 510-519. Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University
Collaboration: Final Report, Education Ltd, Essex.
Orsenigo, L. (1989) The emergence of biotechnology: Institutions and markets in industrial innovation;
London: Pinter.
Interreg IV C FRESH project handbook
ELVIRA UYARRA, JENS SÖRVIK AND INGER MIDTKANDAL (2014): Inter-regional Collaboration in Research
and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3), JRC Technical Reports, S3 Working Paper Series
No. 06/2014, page 31.
Sara Carter and Dylan Jones-Evans (2012) Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy,
3/E; ©2012 • Pearson
ESPON (2010). European Perspective on Specific Types of Territories. Brussels: European Union.
Etzkowtiz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of Government-
Industry and Government Relations. London, Croom Helm.
European Commission, Directorate General for Research (2006), report prepared by independent experts:
Prof. Phil COOKE – Cardiff University – Cardiff - The United Kingdom; RAPORTEUR: Prof. Bjørn ASHEIM -
Lund University – Lund – Sweden, Prof. Jan ANNERSTEDT – Copenhagen Business School – Frederiksberg –
Denmark Dr Jirí BLAŽEK – Charles University – Praha – Czech RepublicProf. Ron BOSCHMA – Utrecht
University – Utrecht – The NetherlandsProf. Daneš BRZICA – Institute of Slovak and World Economy –
Bratislava – Slovakia Prof. Asa DAHLSTRAND LINDHOLM – Halmstad University – Halmstad – Sweden Mr.
Jaime DEL CASTILLO HERMOSA – Información y Desarrollo S.L.- Bilbao – Spain Prof. Philippe LAREDO –
Laboratoire Territoires, Techniques, Sociétés - Paris– France Ms Marina MOULA – Cyclotron Ltd – Athens –
GreeceProf. Andrea PICCALUGA – Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, IN-SAT Lab – Pisa – Italy.
European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures –ESFRI (2016) STRATEGY REPORT ON RESEARCH
INFRASTRUCTURES Roadmap 2016, http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures, page 22.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 13 of 25
Feldman, M. (1994), Knowledge complementarity and innovation; Small Business Economics 6(3): 363-372.
Feldman, M. P. (1994), The Geography of Innovation (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).
Feldman, M. P. (1998). “The New Economics of Innovation, Spillovers and Agglomeration: A Review of
Empirical Studies.” Working Paper, March.
Feldman, M. P.,(1993), An examination of the geography of innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change 4:
451-470.
Felsentsein, D. And Portnov, B.A. (2006). The liability of smallness: Can We Expect Less Regional
Disparities in Small Countries? In Regional Disparities in Small
FIRI (The Finnish Research Infrastructure Committee) (2014) Finland’s Strategy and Roadmap for Research
Infrastructures 2014 -2020.
Fitjar, R. D. and Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2012) Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway’,
Research Policy, 1 3 .
Foray, D./David, P.A./Hall, B.H. (2009): Smart Specialisation – The Concept. Knowledge Economists Policy
Brief, 9 (= Policy brief delivered by the "Knowledge for Growth" Expert Group advising the Commissioner
for Research, Janez Potoènik).
Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X. G., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Ortega‐
Argilés, R. and Mulatero, F. (2012) Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations
(RIS 3).
FORAY, D. (2015) Smart Specialisation: Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Innovation Policies,
Routledge.
FRANK NEFFKE, MATTÉ HARTOG, RON BOSCHMA, MARTIN HENNING (2014) Agents of structural change.
The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification; Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography
(PEEG) 1410, Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography, revised Apr 2014.
Franz Tödtling and Michaela Trippl (2005) One size fits all?Towards a differentiated regional innovation
policy approach, Research Policy 34 (2005) 1203–1219.
Mark S. Freel (2003) Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity; Research Policy
32 (2003) 751–770.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 14 of 25
FRENKEN K., VAN OORT F. and VERBURG T. (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional
economic growth, Regional. Studies 41, 685–697.
Frenz, M., Michie, J. and Oughton, C. (2005). Innovation and cooperation: the role of absorptive capacity,
Birkbeck Working Paper Series: Birkbeck University of London, Regional Studies, 31, 491-504.
Frenz, M., and Oughton, M. (2006). Innovation in the UK Regions and Devolved Administrations: A Review
of the Literature: Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister, DTI, London.
Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity (The Free Press, New York).
GAIL EDMONDSON, LORI VALIGRA, MICHAEL KENWARD, RICHARD L HUDSON, HAYDN BELELD (2012).
Making industry-university partnerships work Lessons from successful collaborations, 2012 Science|Business
Innova on Board AISBL.
GIANELLE, C., & KLEIBRINK, A. (2015): Monitoring mechanisms for smart specialisation strategies, S3
policy brief series, 13/2015. Spain: European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
Giulio Cainelli and Donato Iacobucci (2011) Agglomeration, related variety and vertical integration,
Provincia di Trento, WP 4/2011.
Giulio Cainelli and Donato Iacobucci (2011) Agglomeration, related variety and vertical integration,
Provincia di Trento, WP 4/2011.
Glaeser, E. L., H. D. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer. (1992). “Growth in Cities,” Journal of Political
Economy 100(6): 1126–1152.CrossRef
Goffin, K. and Mitchell, R. (2005). Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation Using the
Pentathlon Framework, (Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, Houndmills).
Gordon, I.R. and McCann, P. (2000). Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and /or Social
Networks, Urban Studies, 37 (3), 513-532.
Griffith, R., Redding, S. and Van Reenen, J. (2003). ‘R&D and absorptive capacity: theory and empirical
evidence’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99-118.
Griliches, Z. (1979). “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity
Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 92–116.CrossRef
Griliches, Z. (1991). “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” Working Paper 3768, July, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 15 of 25
Griliches, Z. (1992). ‘The search for R&D spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 29-47.
Guellec, D., and B. Van Pottelsberghe. (1999). “Les brevets comme indicateurs de l’innovation.” Seminar on
the program of research of CNRS: Les enjeux économiques de l’innovation, Les Cahiers de l’Innovation, no.
99024, February 26.
H., FELDMAN, M. P. & KOGLER, D. F. (eds.) Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge
Creation, Diffusion, and Innovation. Routledge.BOSCHMA, R. & MARTIN, R. 2010. The Handbook of
evolutionary economic geography, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Hall, B. H., Z. Griliches, and J. A. Hausman. (1986). “Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?” International
Economic Review 27(2): 265–283.CrossRef
Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics; Volume 5, Pages 1-1653 (2015), Handbook of Regional and
Urban Economics, Edited by Gilles Duranton, J. Vernon Henderson and William C. Strange
HARMAAKORPI, V. (2006) Regional Development Platform Method (RDPM) as a Tool for Regional
Innovation Policy, European Planning Studies 14: 1085-1114
HARMAAKORPI, V., T. TURA AND H. MELKAS (2011), Regional innovation platforms, in P. Cooke, B.
Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz and F. Todtling (eds.) Handbook of Regional Innovation and
Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 556-572.
Harman, G., and Harman, K. (2004). Governments and Universities as the Main Drivers of Enhanced
Australian University Research Commercialisation Capability. Journal of Higher Education Policy and
Management, 26(2), 153-169.
Havnes, P.A., and Senneseth, K.(2001). A Panel Study of Firm Growth among SMEs in Networks, Journal
Small Business Economics, 16 (4), 293-302.
Henning Kroll (2015) Weaknesses and Opportunities of RIS3-type Policies, Seven Theses. Fraunhofer
Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. and Hausmann, R. (200 ) The Product Space Conditions the
Development of Na
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. and Hausmann, R. (200 ) The Product Space Conditions the
Development of Nations’, Science, 317, 2.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 16 of 25
Howells, J. (1999). Regional Systems of Innovation, in: D Archibugi, J Howells and J Michie (eds),
Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howells, J. (2002). Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography, Urban Studies, 39(5-6): 871-
884.
Howitt, P. (2000). ‘Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences ‘, American Economic Review,
vol. 90(4), 829-846.
IGOR ROTARU (2015): SMART SPECIALISATION IN THE LESS ADVANCED REGIONS. WHAT ARE THE KEY
CHALLENGES?
Interreg IV C FRESH project handbook 2013, page 7 and 69-78.
Interreg IV C Know-Hub project, http://www.know-hub.eu/knowledge-base/videos/long-term-thinking-as-
precondition-for-regional-innovation-strategies-for-smart-specialisation-ris3.html
Iryna Kristensen, Jukka Teräs and Linus Rispling (2016) Nordregio Report 2016, Chapter 9 INNOVATION:
Nordic lead the charts.
Jaffe, A. (1986). ‘Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and
market value", American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
Jaffe, A. B. (1989). “Real Effects of Academic Research.” American Economic Review 79(5): 957–970.
Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. (1993). “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as
Evidenced by Patent Citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics (August) 577–598.
Jaffe, A.B., and M. Trajtenberg (2002), Patents, citations, and innovations: a window on the knowledge
economy, (MIT Press: Cambridge).
Jaider Vega, Antonio Gutierrez-Gracia, Ignacio Fernández-de Lucio (2007) An analytical model of absorptive
capacity. Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2007 on APPROPRIABILITY,
PROXIMITY, ROUTINES AND INNOVATION, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark, June 18 - 20, 2007
JAIDER VEGA, ANTONIO GUTIERREZ-GRACIA, IGNACIO FERNÁNDEZ-DE LUCIO (2007) Appropriability,
Proximity, Routines And Innovation, An Analytical Model Of Absorptive Capacity. Paper presented at the
DRUID Summer Conference 2007, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark, June 18 - 20, 2007 (Determinants (input
indicators) of absorpritve capacity: organizational knowledge, formalization, and social integration
mechanisms…)
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 17 of 25
Jirí Blažek, Adrian Healy,James Wilson, Edurne Magro, Michaele Trippl, Markus Grillitsch, Teis Hansen,
John Goddard, Paul Vallance (2014) Regions with Less Developed Research and Innovation Systems;
SMARTSPEC: SMART SPECIALISATION FOR REGIONAL INNOVATION, Reflection Paper: Work Package 3
January 2014 , This project is funded by the European Union under the FP7 Cooperation Programme: Social
Sciences and the Humanities. Grant number 320131.
JIRÍ BLAŽEK, ADRIAN HEALY,JAMES WILSON, EDURNE MAGRO, MICHAELE TRIPPL, MARKUS
GRILLITSCH, TEIS HANSEN, JOHN GODDARD, PAUL VALLANCE (2014): FP7 project SMART
SPECIALISATION FOR REGIONAL INNOVATION, Regions with Less Developed Research and Innovation
Systems, Reflection Paper: Work Package 3 January 2014.
Johan Jansson and Anders Waxell (22011) Quality and Regional Competitiveness; Environment and
Planning A September 1, 2011 43: 2237-2252
Jukka Teräs, Alexandre Dubois, Jens Sörvik and Martina Pertoldi (2015) Implementing Smart Specialisation
in Sparsely Populated Areas; S3 Working Paper Series, No.10/2015, JRC Technical reports.
JUKKA TERÄS, ALEXANDRE DUBOIS, JENS SÖRVIK AND MARTINA PERTOLDI (2015): Implementing Smart
Specialisation in Sparsely Populated Areas, S3 Working Papers Series No. 10/2015, JRC Technical Reports.
p13
Juliana Dahl (2013) Innovation and Growth in Regions with Specific Geographical Features, Advanced
Studies in International Economic Policy Research Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Working Paper
No.463.
Kautz, K., and Thaysen, K. (2001). Knowledge, learning and IT Support in a Small Software Company,
Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (4), 349-357.Keast, R. and Brown, K. (2002). The Government
Service Delivery Network: A Case Study
Knowledge Distance. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(2), 85-98. Lowndes, V., and Skelcher, C.
(1998). “The dynamics of multi-organisational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance.”
Public Administration, 76(2),
Korres, G. M., Tsobanoglou, G. O. & Kokkinou, A. (2011). Innovation Geography and Regional Growth in
European Union. SAGE Open.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 18 of 25
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-
499.
Krugman, P. (1995). Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Krugman, P. & Obstfeld, M. (1997). International Economics . Boston: Addison-Wesley.Krugman, P. & Wells,
R. (2006). Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
Lars Coenen, Bjorn Asheim, Markus M Bugge, Sverre J Herstad (2016) Advancing regional innovation
systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Published online before
print May 5, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0263774X16646583, Environ Plann C Gov Policy May 5, 2016
0263774X16646583
Lee, C., Lee, K., and Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Triple Helix: An Evolutionary Model of Innovation, Research
LEYDESDORFF, L. & ETZKOWITZ, H. 2001. A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations "Mode
2" and the globalization of "national" systems of innovation.
LEYDESDORFF, L. & MEYER, M. 2006. Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems:
Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35, 1441-1449. [Frederiksberg], Copenhagen Business
School Press.
LORENTZEN, A. (2005): The spatial dimensions of innovation. Amsterdam: 45th Congress of the European
Regional Science Association.
LORENTZEN, A. (2008): Knowledge networks in local and global space, Entrepreneurship & Regional
Development, 20, 533-545.
Lucas, R.E. (1993), Making a miracle, Econometrica, 61: 251-272.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–
42.
Lucas, R. E. (2001), Externalities and cities, Review of Economic Studies, 4: 245-274.
Lucas, R.E. and E. Rossi-Hansberg (2002), On the internal structure of cities, Econometrica 70: 1445-1476.
Luisa Sanches (2012) RIS 3 and Research Infrastructures in which context?, O Sistema Nacional de
Investigação e Inovação: Desafios, forças e fraquezas rumo a 2020 Lisboa, 11/12 Dezembro 2012.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 19 of 25
Lumpkin, G. T., and Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct
Lundvall, B-Å (ed) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation 2002, MIT
September 29, Available at www.isnie.org).Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three
types of firms. Management
Lundvall, B-Å. and S. Borrás (1997), The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy.
Report from DG XII, Commission of the European Union.
LUTZ, E./BENDER, M./ACHLEITNER, A.K./KASERER, C. (2012): Importance of spatial proximity between
venture capital investors and investees in Germany, Journal of Business Research, in press.
Maddala, G. S. (1992). Introduction to Econometrics (2“d ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. (1999). “R-D et productivité: survol de la literature.” Programme CNRS: Les
Enjeux Économiques de l’Innovation, Les Cahiers de l’Innovation 99019: 53.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31, 247- Management
Review, 4(4), 439 – 459.
Mansfield, E. (1995). “Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and
Financing.” Review of Economics and Statistics, February 77 (1): 55–65.
Marshall, A. (1971). Principes d’économie politique. 1906. New York: Gordon & Breach.
MARTIN R., TRIPPL M. (2013) System failures, knowledge bases and regional innovation policies. CIRCLE
working paper no. 2013/13, CIRCLE, Lund University.
Martin, P. (1998). Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe? The World Economy,
21(6), 757-774.
Martin, P. (1999). Are European regional policies delivering? . EIB Papers, 4(2), 10-23.
Martin, P. and Ottaviano, G. (1996) Growing locations: Industry Location in a Model of Endogenous Growth;
European Economic Review 43 (1999) 281—302.
Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (1998). Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional
Development. Economic Geography, 74(3), 201-227.
MARTIN, R. & SUNLEY, P. (2006) Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution; Journal of Economic
Geography, 6, 395-437.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 20 of 25
MARTIN, R. & SUNLEY, P. 2010. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the
econoomic landscape. In: BOSCHMA, R. & MARTIN, R. (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic
Geography. Celtenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
MARTIN, R., MOODYSSON J. (2013) Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organisation of
knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional
Studies 20(2), 170-187.
Maskell, P. et. al. (1998), Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development. Specilisation and
prosperity in small open economies. Routlegde, London/New York.
Mathieu Doussineau, Smart Specialisation Platform (2016) Opportunities and challenges for RIS3
implementation - from design to implementation; Lyon 28.6.2016.
Maurel, F., and B. Sedillot. (1997). “La concentration géographique des industries françaises.” Economie et
Prévision (October-December): 131.
Maurseth, P. B. & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531-545.
McCann, P. and Ortega‐Argilés, R. (2013) Some Practical Elements Associated with the Design of an
Integrated and Territorial Place‐Based Approach to EU Cohesion Policy’. In Crescenzi, R. and Percoco, M.
(eds) Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Berlin, eidelberg, Springer Berlin
eidelberg, pp5-11.
McCann, P. and Ortega‐Argilés, R. (2014). The Role of the Smart Specialisation: Agenda in a Reformed EU
Cohesion Policy’. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science.
Maria João Corte Real (2015) Patterns of labour force specialization in manufacturing, IN+, June 2015.
Menesrt (1987–96). Enquête R&D. Ministère de l’Education Nationale de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la
Recherche et de la Technologie.
Messen Petruzzelli, Vito Albino and Nunzia Carbonara (2009) External knowledge sources and proximity,
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 13, No 5 2009 pp 300-318.
MIKKA NIEMINEN (2004). Recent Developments and Current Challenges of University Research in Finland,
University of Tampere (2004).
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 21 of 25
MINTZBERG, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans,
Planners. New York, NY: Free Press; Maxwell Macmillan Canada.
Monfort, P. (2009) Territories with specific geographic features; Regional Policy; Brussels, European Union
Working Papers 02/2009.
MORGAN K. (1997) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Reg. Studies 31,
491-503.
Narula, R. (2003). Globalization and Technology: Interdependence, Innovation Systems and Industrial
Policy, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2003).
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. (Oxford University
Nooteboom, B., (2000) Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance;
Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1): 69-92.
Noteboom B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies; Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Noteboom, B & STAM, E. (2008) Micro-foundations for innovation policy; Amsterdam, Amsterdam University
Press.
Noteboom, B. (2008): Learning and Innovation in Inter-organizational Relationships. In: S. Cropper, M.
Ebers, C. Huxham & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interorganizational relations. (pp. 144-
164) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
O’Gorman, C. (2000). Strategy and The Small Firm, In: Evans, D.J. and Carter, S. (Eds.),
Observatory of Science and Technology (OST). (1994, 1996, 1998). Sciences et Technologie, Indicateurs.
Report of the OST, Economica.
Observatory of Science and Technology (OST). (1997). Les chiffres clef de la science et de la technologie,
Economica.
Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., and Morgan, K. (2002). The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy
and Industrial Policy; The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2002, vol. 27, issue 1, pages 97-110.
Parrilli, D. M. and Elola, A. (2011) The Strength of Science and Technology Drivers for SME Innovation’,
Small Business Economics, 36.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 22 of 25
PHILIP COOK,OLGA MEMEDOVIC, (2003): STRATEGIES FOR REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS: Learning
Transfer and Applications, UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2003,
Philip McCann and Raquel Ortega-Argilés (2011) Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to
EU Cohesion Policy, ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY WORKING PAPER 2011: FACULTY OF SPATIAL SCIENCES,
UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN.
Philippe Aghion and Xavier Jaravel (2015) Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation and Growth; The Economic
Journal Volume 125, Issue 583, March 2015, Pages 533–573
Pike, A. and J. Tomaney (1999), The Limits to Localization in Declining Industrial Regions? Trans-National
Corporations and Economic Development in Sedgefield Borough. European Planning Studies, 7,4: 407-428.
Poon, J.M., Ainuddin, R.A., and Junit, S.H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and Entrepreneurial
Orientation on Firm Performance, International Small Business Journal, 24 (1) 61-82.
R. HAUSMANN AND D. RODRIK, "Economic Development as Self-Discovery", Journal of Development
Economics, vol.72, December 2003, 603-633.
Rallet, A. (1993). “Choix de proximité et processus d’innovation technologique,” Revue d’Economie
Régionale et Urbaine 3 (spécial): 365–386.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). From marketisation to diplomacy: It’s the mix that matters, Public Policy and
Administration, 12, 31-50.
Roberto P. Camagni (1995) THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATIVE MILIEU AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR PUBLIC
POLICIES IN EUROPEAN LAGGING REGIONS, Papers in Regional Science, Volume 74, Issue 4 October
1995, Pages 317–340.
Rodriguez -Pose, A. & Fratesi, U. (2007). Between Development and Social Policies. The Impact of
European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions. Regional Studies, 38(1), 97-113.
Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002– 1037.
Romer, P. (1991). “Progrès technique endogène.” Annales d ’Economie et de Statistiques 22: 32.
RON BOSCHMA (2013): Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of Two
European Policy Concepts, Center for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy
(CIRCLE) Lund University, Sweden Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU) Utrecht University,
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 23 of 25
the Netherlands, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 13.22,
http://econ.geog.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html
RON BOSCHMA (2013): Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialization: Comparison of Two European
Policy Concepts; Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE) Lund
University, Sweden Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU) Utrecht University, the Netherlands,
Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 13.22, http://econ.geog.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html
RON BOSCHMA & ASIER MINONDO & MIKEL NAVARRO (2012): "The emergence of new industries at the
regional level in Spain. A proximity approach based on product-relatedness," Papers in Evolutionary
Economic Geography (PEEG) 1201, Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography, revised Jan 2012.
RON BOSCHMA & CARLO GIANELLE, 2014. "Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy," JRC-IPTS
Working Papers JRC88242, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.
RON BOSCHMA & GIANLUCA CAPONE (2014): "Relatedness and Diversification in the EU-27 and ENP
countries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1407, Utrecht University, Section of
Economic Geography, revised Feb 2014.
RON BOSCHMA & GIANLUCA CAPONE (2014): "Relatedness and Diversification in the EU-27 and ENP
countries," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1407, Utrecht University, Section of
Economic Geography, revised Feb 2014.
RON BOSCHMA, VÍCTOR MARTÍN AND ASIER MINONDO (2014): Neighbor regions as the source of new
industries, CIRCLE, WP 2015/35.
SOTARAUTA M. (2010). Regional Development and Regional Networks: The Role of Regional Development
Officers in Finland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17:4, 387-400.
STRAMBACH S., KLEMENT B. (2012): Cumulative and Combinatorial Micro-dynamics of Knowledge: The
Role of Space and Place in Knowledge Integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843-1866.
THOMAS BREKKE (2014) Regional economic change, entrepreneurship and regional path dependency in
Non-Metropolitan Region; Entrepreneurship & Regional Development Vol. 27, Issues 3-4,2015.
TÖDTLING F. AND TRIPPL M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy
approach; Research Policy 34(8), 1203-1219.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 24 of 25
TÖDTLING F. AND TRIPPL M. (2013) Transformation of regional innovation systems: from old legacies to
new development paths. In P Cooke (ed), Reframing regional development, Routledge, London, pp. 297-
317.
Verspagen, B. (1992). “Endogenous Innovation in Neo-Classical Growth Models: A Survey.” Journal of
Macroeconomics 14(4): 631–662.CrossRef
Voss, Z.G., Voss, G.B., and Moreman, C. (2005). An empirical examination of the complex relationships
between entrepreneurial orientation and stakeholder support, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (9/10),
1132-1150.
Weber K.M. and Rohracher H. (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for
transformative change. Combining insights from innovation systems and multi- level perspectives in a
comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy 41(6), 1037- 1047.
Wickert, A., and Herschel, R. (2001). Knowledge management issues for smaller businesses, Journal of
Knowledge management, 5 (4), 329-337.
Wiklund, J., and Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial Orientation and small business performance: a
configurational approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1), 71-91.
World Bank, 2009, World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, World Bank,
Washington DC.
World Bank, 2009, World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, World Bank,
Washington DC.
Yeh-Yun-Lin, C. (1998). Success Factors Of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises In Taiwan: An Analysis Of
Cases, Journal of Small Business Management, 36(4), 43-56.
Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and J. Armstrong. (1994). “Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of
Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers.” Working Paper 4946, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
2017 University-Industry Interaction Conference Practitioner abstract | Increasing the effectiveness of RIS3 implementation through university -to-industry interactions Page 25 of 25