ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy...

8
21/04/2013 1 Proposal Proposalfor benchmark for benchmark study study Full Full scale scale warehouse warehouse real real fire firetest test FULL FULL SCALE SCALEWAREHOUSE WAREHOUSEIN IN STEEL STEELSTRUCTURE STRUCTURE COST, 18-19 April 2013 Main goal of the test experimental investigation on the shape of flames and consequent radiation heat flux Full scale test was performed with Storage building occupying an area of more than 1600 m² with two compartments of 36 x 24 m Unprotected steel frame Height of the building: 12 m different types of façade cladding Storage ratio: 80% of racks filled with wood racks

Transcript of ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy...

Page 1: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

1

ProposalProposal for benchmark for benchmark studystudy

Full Full scalescale warehousewarehouse real real firefire testtest

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE IN IN STEELSTEEL STRUCTURESTRUCTURE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Main goal of the test

� experimental investigation on the shape of flames and

consequent radiation heat flux

Full scale test was performed with

� Storage building occupying an area of more than 1600 m²

with two compartments of 36 x 24 m

� Unprotected steel frame

� Height of the building: 12 m

� different types of façade cladding

� Storage ratio: 80% of racks filled with wood racks

Page 2: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

2

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE IN IN STEELSTEEL STRUCTURESTRUCTURE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Fire wall

≈≈≈≈ 12 m

Warehouse divided into two fire compartments and one of

them subject to fire

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE IN IN STEELSTEEL STRUCTURESTRUCTURE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

The compartment subject to fire with all building components

• structure (hot-rolled members) and envelop (roof and façades)

36 m x (24 m + 24 m)

H = 12 m

Page 3: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

3

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE WITHWITH WOODWOOD PALLETSPALLETS

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Mur CF

IPE600

IPE600

24 m 24 m

IPE600

IPE 220

UPN 160

11,74

24 m 24 m

36 m

3 m

6 m

bardage double-peau

bardage simple-peau non protégé

bardage double-peau

toiture (bac acier + étanchéité)

IPE600

IPE 270

IPE 270

IPE600

Mur CF en plaque de plâtre

Mur CF en béton cellulaire

Mur CF en béton cellulaire

IPE 220

Five 8 m high racks filled with wood pallets (310 tons of wood)

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Ventilation condition:

• Roof: four 3 m x 2 m smoke exhaust vents

• Façade: five 1 m x 2,5 m reduced scale doors

Page 4: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

4

FULL FULL SCALESCALE WAREHOUSEWAREHOUSE FIRE TESTFIRE TEST

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Data recording

• 183 TC of which 87 for structural memebrs

• 2 displacement transducers on fire wall columns

• 38 heat fluxmeters

• 18 cameras

Detailed experimental results

• Videos

• Excel files

• Test report in French

THERMAL COUPLES

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Bardage double peau

Bar

dage

sim

ple

peau

Bar

dage

dou

ble

pea

u

Mur CF

IPE600

IPE 220

UPN 160 24 m 24 m

36 m

3 m

6 m

IPE600

IPE 270

IPE 270

IPE600

IPE 220

C20-C21 C10-C11

B1

B2

B3 B4

B5 B6

B7

B8 B9

B10 B11

C7-C9

C4-C6

C1-C3

C12-C13

C14-C15

B12

B13

B14

B15

Bx : poutre

Cx : poteau

C16-C17

C18-C19

Page 5: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

5

CHRONOLOGY OF THE FIREFIRE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

a : Allumage des palettes b : Développement du feu 7 min après l’allumage avec chute de débris

c : Propagation du feu à la rangé D (par rayonnement) au niveau inférieur

d : Effondrement de la rangée de racks E vu par la caméra placée entre les rangées D et E

CAM_3H-2m_1min28’ après allumage

CAM_3H-2m_7min 32’ après allumage

CAM_3H-2m_10min00’ après allumage CAM_4H+4m_≈22min après allumage

CHRONOLOGY OF THE FIREFIRE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

7.5 min 11 min 15 min

18.5 min 21.5 min 21.5 min

25 min 30 min 35 min

Page 6: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

6

CHRONOLOGY OF THE FIREFIRE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

35 min

40 min

61 min

65 min

GAS TEMPERATURE

COST, 18-19 April 2013

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Tem

ratu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC13 TC14

TC15 TC16

TC17 TC18

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Tem

pér

atu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC26 TC27 TC28 TC29

TC30 TC31 TC32

central rack: source of the fire

rack close to façade

Page 7: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

7

TEMPERATURE OF STEEL BEAMS

COST, 18-19 April 2013

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

Tem

ratu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC1

TC2

TC3

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

Tem

ratu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC13

TC14

TC15

TEMPERATURE OF STEEL COLUMNS

COST, 18-19 April 2013

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

Tem

ratu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC 26 : C1 TC 32 : C2

TC 33 : C2 TC 38 : C3TC 43 : C4 TC 46 : C5TC 47 : C5

0

100

200

300

400

500

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27

Tem

ratu

re (

°C)

Temps (min)

TC 22 : C1 TC 23 : C1 TC 28 : C2

TC 29 : C2 TC 34 : C3 TC 35 : C3

TC 40 : C4 TC 41 : C4 TC 44 : C5

TC 45 : C5 TC 60 : C9 TC 61 : C9

Page 8: ProposalProposalfor benchmark for benchmark studystudy ...fire.fsv.cvut.cz/ifer/WP4/PP-Prague/16_Zhao.pdf · • Excel files • Test report in French THERMAL COUPLES COST, 18-19

21/04/2013

8

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR

COST, 18-19 April 2013

Real fire

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210

Dis

plac

emen

t(m

m)

Time (min)

Dép_Poteau 1

Dép_Poteau 2

OBJECTIVE OF BENCHMARK STUDY

COST, 18-19 April 2013

• Fire resistance of unprotected steel structure under real fire

• Tenability condition for occupants before the collapse of

unprotected steel structure

• Failure mode of unprotected steel structure

• inward collpase

• Progressive collapse of steel structures