Proportional Nomograms

True for all types shown here

Proportional Design:

4 Variable Proportion

Other Layouts

Father’s Day

Mother’s Day

Memorial Day

Compound Linear Design:

Compound Nomograms

Equations of more than three variables can be graphically computed using compound nomograms sharing scales.

k

Themiddlesolutionscaleoftheconcurrentnomogram

fortworesistorsinparallelcanbeusedastheouter

scaleofasecondnomogramtoextendthenomogram

forthreeresistors.Afourthparallelresistorcanbe

addedbyseesawingbackthroughthefirstsetof

scales,andsoforth.Aseriesresistorsimplyslides

upwardalongthescale.

Since the angle A between the

scales is 60, the scales are

identical.

The k-scale is not labeled with scale

values. It is called a pivot line.

Two Classic Nomogram Designs

A Concurrent-Scale Nomogram

where A is the angle between each of the 3 scales.

If A = 60° as below, then m1 = m2 = m3.

Standard resistor values can be marked so

a convenient combination can be found by

playing with the straightedge.

Here we have

r2 = V/πh

An “N” or “Z” ChartDesign:

The diagonal scale can be floating segment,

thus appearing “rather more spectacular” to

the casual observer [Douglass 1947].

Design:

Division Harmonic Relation

Independence Day Independence Day (Obs.)

Easter Sunday

Solving Polynomial EquationsFinding real roots graphically

Linear scales and

easy custom ranges

of A and B for

Ax2+ x + B = 0

No need to

graduate the

circle! Read the

roots as –B on

lines from O

through the

marked location

on the circle

(here -3.06 for

A=-0.1, B=4)

Wheeler, The Mathematical

Gazette, 41:336, May, 1957

Two real roots are found if the isopleth cuts the circle,

one repeated real root if it touches the circle, no real

roots if it misses the circle entirely

For a real root w1found here,

the second root = u+w1

Not a nomogram, but a networkor

intersectionchartfor finding roots of the

cubic equation z3+ pz+ q = 0. There will

be one real root, 3 real roots of which

two are equal, or 3 real roots, depending

on whether z (interpolated between the

slanted lines) lies outside of the

triangular region, on its boundary, or

within it. For example, p=0.6 and q=-0.4

gives z=0.47, while p=-0.8 and q=0.11

gives z=-0.96, 0.82, 0.14.

q2–aq + b = 0

w2+ uw + v = 0

Nomography

The simplicity of a

nomogram can be

startling!

Much simpler to plot

No family of curves or

grid

Much finer resolution

Less prone to

mistakes

Can be extended to

additional variables

A straightedge

(such as the

edge of a sheet

of paper or a

string) called an

isopleth is used

to connect

known values to

find the

unknown value.

Nomograms solve equations in 3 or more variables, providing lightning fast, easy calculations to an engineering precision in a form that is easy to reproduce on a photocopier

T = 1.0

T = 1.1

T = 1.2

T = 1.3

T = 1.4

T = 1.5

T = 1.6

T = 1.7

T = 1.8

T = 1.9

T = 2.0

A traditional three-variable graph

A parallel-scale nomogram

Example: N = (1.2D + 0.47)0.68(0.91T)3/2Nomography was invented in 1880 by Maurice d’Ocagne and was used extensively for many years to provide engineers with fast graphical calculations of complicated formulas to a practical precision.

Parallel-Scale Design:

m1 = height/range for D scale

m2 = height/range for T scale

m3 = m1m2/(m1+m2)

a/b = m1/m2 and a+b =

width0.68 log(1.2D + 0.47) + 1.5 log T = log N – 1.5 log 0.91

Take logarithms to convert the equation t0 a sum

AstronomyOnce invented, nomogramswere soon applied to time-consuming and repetitive calculations in celestial mechanics

This is an example of a

nomogram solving for a

variable (φ) that cannot be

isolated algebraically.

nt = φ–e sin φ

Kepler’sEquation for the relation between the

polar angle φof a celestial body in an eccentric

orbit and the time elapsed from an initial point

Celestial Parallax: the difference between

topocentric and geocentric location when

observing comets and minor planets. Done

with parallax correction, generally to two

digits and in great number to define the

orbits:

Δpα= parallax factor

πs = mean equatorial horizontal

parallax of the sun in seconds

ρ= Earth radius to observation

point in term of equatorial radius

φ= geocentric latitude of

observer

δ,H = declination and hour angle

of body

Kresàk, Bulletin of the

Astronomical Institute of

Czechoslovakia, 1957

after Leif Roschier—see

http://www.pynomo.org/wiki/index.php/Example:Star_navigation

Spherical Triangle relation between

declination, latitude, hour angle and azimuth

Spherical Triangle relation between

declination, latitude, altitude and azimuth

Dygograms

Now extend ND the same distance beyond

D to find the South (S) point. The point Q is

the intersection with the circle. Continue to

create the Limaçon of Pascal figure by

moving the midpoint of the segment NS

along the circle and marking the endpoints.

δ = A + B sin ζ’ + C cos ζ’ + D sin 2 ζ’ + E cos ζ’

For any ship compass

reading (the compass

course ζ’), draw a line

from Q at this angle

from QN (the red

arrow here) and mark

the point where it

crosses the vertical

line OX. Then with

dividers construct an

arc that passes

through O, Q, and this

point (the blue circle)

and mark a new point

where it crosses the

limaçon (the magnetic

course ζ). The

magnetic deviation δ is

the angle between OX

and this new point as

read on the protractor.

δ is the magnetic deviation (compass correction)

ζ’ is the ship compass reading (compass course)

A, D, E, λ, c, f, P and Q are magnetic parameters

measured for the ship

H and θ are the horizontal component and dip angle

of the Earth’s magnetic variation at the ship location

A = arcsin A

B = arcsin [B / (1 + ½ sin D)]

C = arcsin [C / (1 - ½ sin D)]

D = arcsin D

E = arcsin E

A, D, E = constants for ship

B = (1/λ) (c tan θ + P / H)

C = (1/λ) (f tan θ + Q / H)

The Scottish mathematician and lawyer Archibald Smith first published in 1843 his equations for the magnetic deviation of a ship, or in other words, the error in the ship’s compasses from permanent and Earth-induced magnetic fields in the iron of the ship itself. This effect had been noticed in mostly wooden ships for centuries, and broad attempts to minimize it were implemented. But the advent of ships with iron hulls and steam engines in the early 1800s created a real crisis. A mathematical formulation of the deviation for all compass courses for a location at sea was needed in order to understand and compensate for it. Smith invented graphical methods for quickly calculating the magnetic deviation for any ship’s course once ship parameters were found, geometric constructions called dynamogoniograms (force-angle diagrams), or dygograms for short.

To construct a dygogram, find the

North (N) position by laying out from O

the lengths A, B, C, D and E as

shown. Draw a circle centered at A

and passing through D. The magnetic

deviation δ for a magnetic course ζ of

North (0 ) is the angle XON read on

the protractor.

Alternate graphical computers

Labor Day

Valentine’s DayPresident’s Day

Navigation and Surveying

Friauf, Am. Math.

Monthly, 42:4, 1935

A 3D (4x4 determinant) nomogram

solution for Great Circle Distance

Here the φ-scale lies the same distance dabove the paper as the L-scale lies

below it, but they are flattened to the paper.First, points A and B are joined by a

line. Then for a given L (point C), all four points will be coplanar if the point on the

flattened φ-scale is the same distance from AB as C and on a line parallel to AB.

A transparent overlay of parallel lines is used to find φ.

M. Collignon

sin φ–cos φtan ε–ρtan ε= 0

Angular correction for land surveys

Great Circle Distance

λ–λ’ = 25.2 °

λ+ λ’ = 72.5 °

L = 116 °

φ= 87.5°

Lallemand’s L’Abaque Triomphe

In 1885, Charles Lallemand, director

general of the geodetic measurement of

altitudes throughout France, published a

hexagonal chart for determining the

compass course correction (the magnetic

deviation) due to iron in the ship, Le

Triomphe for any navigable location on

Earth. It is a stunning piece of work,

combining measured values of magnetic

variation around the world with eight

magnetic parameters of the ship also

measured experimentally, all merged into a

very complicated formula for magnetic

deviation as seen at the top of the chart.

The sample calculation on the chart is described above:

1. The ship latitude and longitude is located among the curved lines on the leftmost map and a horizontal line is

extended to the compass course ζ’ in the center hourglass grid (a distance Y1 = B sin ζ’ from the vertical green line)

2. The ship latitude and longitude is found in the upper (for a northerly heading) or lower (for a southerly heading) map

and a line parallel to the grid is extended to the corresponding compass course in the twisted grid (a distance Y2 = A +

C cos ζ’ + D sin 2 ζ’ + E cos ζ’ from the angled green line).

3. A translucent hexagonal overlay (shown in blue) is overlaid so that two arms pass through the two marked points.

Through a geometric exercise, it can be shown that the magnetic deviation (compass correction) Y3 on the third scale

is the sum of Y1 and Y2.

ζ’ is the current ship compass reading ( or compass

course)

H and θ are the horizontal component and dip angle of

the Earth’s magnetic variation at the ship location

A, D, E, λ, c, f, P and Q are magnetic parameters

measured for Le Triomphe

Columbus Day (Generally)

Halloween

New Year’s Day

Martin Luther King Day

Shared-Scale Nomograms

Here the h1 and h2scales are identical, and two

ranges are marked on different sides of the scales.

f1(u)f2(v)f3(w) = 1

The 3 real roots of a cubic

equation ax3+bx2+cx+d = 0

sum to –b/a, so a plot of x3

marked with its x-values

provides a single scale

nomogram for addition.

To generalize these from u, v, w to f1(u), f2(v), f3(w),

we assign to the scales the values for which f1(u),

f2(v) and f3(w) will provide the values we see here.

With proper mathematical preparation, two or more scales can share a curve, or even share the same values on that curve

f1(u) + f2(v) + f3(w) = f1(u)f2(v)f3(w)

u+v+w = 0

Lalanne’s Universal Calculator

LaLanne envisioned copies of his Universal

Calculator posted in public squares and

business meeting places for popular use.

In 1844, Leon LaLanne created the first log-log plot in history, his Universal Calculator.

The product of x and y is found from their intersection with the 45°lines, squares at the 45°line from the origin, cubes from the steeper (Cub) line from the origin or its wraparound, and various engineering and chemical formulas of roots and powers at their lines. Following the line to the edge continues a calculation to additional terms.

Trigonometric functions are plotted along the sides for use (or use of their inverses) in calculations as well.

Election Day

Veteran’s Day

Thanksgiving

Introduction

In 1844 Leon Lalanne succeeded in linearizing the curves y=xpby plotting the first log-log plot in history, thereby creating his Universal Calculator, chock-full of lines for common engineering calculations and capable of graphically computing formulas in powers or roots of x( or of trigonometric functions in x)with ease. The year 1844 is taken here as the start of the Age of Graphical Computing. Other graphical methods evolved, and ultimately the field of nomography was invented in 1880 by Maurice d’Ocagne, a breakthrough in graphical computing so radical that it dominated the field of graphical computing until the spread of computers and electronic calculators in the early 1970s.

This 2010 calendar predominantly treats the field of nomography and the amazing variety of nomograms that can be created from it. A nomogram is a layout of graphical scales for computing formulas of 3 or more variables using a straightedge such as a ruler or the edge of a sheet of paper. A drawn or imagined isoplethconnects matching values

Ron Doerfler

rondoerfler@myreckonings.com

Nomograms can be created with geometric relations, but the more extraordinary ones are nearly always created using a method of determinants developed by d’Ocagne. Sometimes in this calendar you will see an equation adjacent to a nomogram, in which the determinant of a matrix is set equal to zero. When the determinant is expanded, you will see that the resulting equation matches the overall equation of the nomogram. If the determinant is in a form where no variable appears in more than one row and the last column is all 1’s, then the first two elements in each row represent the (x,y) location of the scale point for values of the variable(s) in that row. For example, using the rules for expanding a determinant the equation w= u/(u + v2+ 1) or uw + v2w + w –u = 0 can be expressed as

so a tick on the u-scale lies at (0,u) for every u, (or in other words the u-scale is a linear, vertical scale), the ticks on the v-scale are at (1,-v2), and the ticks on the w-scale are at (w,w) resulting in a linear 45degree scale.

Most of the nomograms herein were created with the PyNomo software package of Leif Roschier found at

http://www.pynomo.org. The calendar pages are based on an InDesign template created by Juliana

Halvorson at http://www.graphmaster.com/calendarinstructions/. All other content ©2010 Ron Doerfler

of variables for a particular formula, so if all variables but one is known, the unknown variable can be read off the intersection of the isopleth with its scale. Variables that cannot be isolated algebraically can be read directly off a nomogram. Beyond their practical use,the scales of a nomogram often create geometric figures and curves of a certain beauty and flair, influenced to a striking degree by the cleverness of the nomographer. Simple nomograms can be seen today at times in engineering catalogs and medical offices, but the really creativeones, the ones that universally draw interest and display the wondrous virtuosity of mathematics, are nowhere to be found anymore.

The nomograms in this calendar are representative of some of the variety once in use for graphical computing, but in no way doesit approach a significant survey of this rich field of study. Perhaps a 2011 calendar will consider other designs. Additional information on nomograms and other topics in this calendar can be found in articles on my blog, “Dead Reckonings: Lost Art in the Mathematical Sciences” at http://www.myreckonings.com/wordpress. I hope you have a happy year in 2010.

An Assortment of Nomograms

Nomograms existed for a variety

of vector and complex number

calculations

A compass is used here

instead of a straightedge

A projection transformation for

greater accuracy at large X

A rare instance of 4

individual scales for a

single isopleth

sinh(A + jB) = p + jqRybner

Hoelscher

Meyer

The θscale could

actually stop at 45.

For angles beyond

this, θ90 –θand x

and y are swapped.

Introduction

It is difficult for us today to grasp the drudgery of complex arithmetic calculations, or even repeated simpler calculations, in the past. This was especially true with repetitive computations that required tables of roots, logarithms and trigonometric functions in such fields as astronomy, navigation, surveying, and a wide variety of military and engineering applications.

Have you ever had to calculate the positions of astronomical objects? Orbital calculations relative to an observer on the Earth require derivations and time-consuming solutions of spherical trigonometric equations. And yet these kinds of calculations were accomplished by ancients such as Vitruvius and Ptolemy in the days prior to the advent of calculators or computers, or even trigonometry or algebra, using methods of Descriptive Geometry that are rarely taught today.

The Greeks folded (rabatted) the fundamental great circles onto the page and performed intricate geometrical constructions to map the Earth-Sun relative motion and incorporate local measurements into global maps and sophisticated sundials.

Astrolabes, quadrants and other volvelles and dials evolved to perform more complex computations in graphical form. In 1610-1614, Joost Bürgi and John Napier invented logarithms, and mathematicians and scientists such as Johann Kepler created tables of logarithms to aid in computation. William Oughtred and others developed the slide rule in the 1600s based on the properties of logarithms, and the slide rule continued its dominant role in non-graphical computation until the early 1970s. The slide rule provided the greatest versatility in computing the vast variety of equations, but it required multiple error-prone steps to provide solutions, effort that was not decreased even when solving one equation repetitively.

Meanwhile, on the graphical front Rene Descartes created the Cartesian coordinate system in the 17th century, and mathematicians over the next two centuries laid the foundation for applied numerical mathematics in large part on this field of analytical geometry. A two-dimensional graph provided fast solutions to an engineering precision for a single equation in two variables, and more complicated families of curves or so-called intersection charts extended the use of Cartesian graphs to one additional variable. T = 1.0

T = 1.1T = 1.2T = 1.3T = 1.4T = 1.5

T = 1.6

T = 1.7

T = 1.8

T = 1.9

T = 2.0

Christmas DayChristmas Eve

New Year’s Eve

The Age of

A 2010 Calendar

Graphical Computing y

A.D. 1844 A.D. 1974

A 2010 Calendar of Graphical Computers

As a calculating aid graphical computers can solve very

complicated formulas with amazing ease.

As a curiosity graphical computers manifest the beauty

of mathematics in a highly visual, highly creative way.

Graphical Computers are fascinating artifacts in the history of mathematics. They possess an intrinsic charm well beyond their practical use.

Most of the nomograms herein were created with the PyNomo software package of Leif Roschier found

at http://www.pynomo.org. The calendar pages are based on an InDesign template created by Juliana

Halvorson at http://www.graphmaster.com/calendarinstructions/. All other content ©2010 Ron Doerfler

Contact: rondoerfler@myreckonings.com