PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY ANNUAL … · Services; Real Estate Management Services; and...
Transcript of PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY ANNUAL … · Services; Real Estate Management Services; and...
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 1 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 2 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
CONTENTS
CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ 4
DIRECTOR-GENERAL’S FOREWORD .................................................................................................................. 5
OFFICIAL SIGN-OFF ........................................................................................................................................... 8
OFFICIAL SIGN-OFF ........................................................................................................................................... 9
MANCO SIGN-OFF ...........................................................................................................................................10
ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS ..........................................................................................................11
PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 15
1. OVERVIEW OF THE 2015/16 BUDGET AND MTEF ESTIMATES .................................................................16
1.1 Expenditure estimates .......................................................................................................................... 16
1.2 Relating expenditure trends to strategic goals .................................................................................... 21
PART B: PROGRAMME AND SUB-PROGRAMME PLANS ............................................................................. 23
The PMTE PROGRAMME STRUCTURE .............................................................................................................24
1. PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................................................26
1.1 Programme 1: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 .......................................... 26
1.2 Programme 1: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................. 28
1.3 Programme 1: Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ...................................................................................... 32
1.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 34
2. PROGRAMME 2: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT .................................................................38
2.1 Programme 2: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ......................................... 38
2.2 Programme 2: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................ 40
2.3 Programme 2: Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ...................................................................................... 45
2.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 48
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 3 of 156
3. PROGRAMME 3: CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT ...................................................................52
3.1 Programme 3: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ......................................... 52
3.2 Programme 3: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................ 54
3.3 Programme 3: Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ...................................................................................... 56
3.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 58
4. PROGRAMME 4: REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................62
4.1 Programme 4: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ......................................... 62
4.2 Programme 4: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................. 64
4.3 Programme 4: Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ..................................................................................... 66
4.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 68
5. PROGRAMME 5: REAL ESTATE INFORMATION & REGISTRY ...................................................................72
5.1 Programme 5: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ......................................... 72
5.2 Programme 5: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................ 74
5.3 Programme 5 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ...................................................................................... 76
5.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 77
6. PROGRAMME 6: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ...........................................................................................81
6.1 Programme 6: Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ......................................... 81
6.2 Programme 6: Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............................ 83
6.3 Programme 6: Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ..................................................................................... 85
6.4 Reconciling performance targets with the Budget and MTEF ............................................................. 86
PART C: LINKS TO OTHER PLANS ..................................................................................................................... 91
PART D: ANNEXURES TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN .................................................................. 93
Annexure A: Technical indicator descriptions .................................................................................................94
1. PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................................................... 94
2. PROGRAMME 2: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES ......................................................................... 110
3. PROGRAMME 3: CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT .................................................................. 128
4. PROGRAMME 4: REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 135
5. PROGRAMME 5: REAL ESTATE INFORMATION & REGISTRY SERVICES .................................................. 143
6. PROGRAMME 6: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 149
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 4 of 156
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Programme 1 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 - 2017/18 ............................... 26
Table 2: Programme 1 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/2016 -2017/18 ............. 28
Table 3: Programme 1 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 .......................................................................... 32
Table 4: Programme 1 Performance Targets ........................................................................................ 34
Table 5: Programme 1 Economic classification ..................................................................................... 35
Table 6: Programme 2 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 .............................. 38
Table 7: Programme 2 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ................. 40
Table 8: Programme 2 Quarterly targets .............................................................................................. 45
Table 9: Programme 2 Performance targets ......................................................................................... 48
Table 10: Programme 1 Economic classification ................................................................................... 48
Table 11: Programme 3 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ............................ 52
Table 12: Programme 3 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............... 54
Table 13: Programme 3 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ........................................................................ 56
Table 14: Programme 3 Performance targets ....................................................................................... 58
Table 15: Programme 3 Economic classification ................................................................................... 58
Table 16: Programme 4 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ............................ 62
Table 17: Programme 4 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............... 64
Table 18: Programme 4 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ........................................................................ 66
Table 19: Programme 4 Performance targets ....................................................................................... 68
Table 20: Programme 4 Economic classification ................................................................................... 69
Table 21: Programme 5 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ............................ 72
Table 22: Programme 5 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............... 74
Table 23: Programme 5 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ........................................................................ 76
Table 24: Programme 5 Performance targets ....................................................................................... 77
Table 25: Programme 5 Economic classification ................................................................................... 77
Table 26: Programme 6 Strategic objective annual targets for 2015/16 – 2017/18 ............................ 81
Table 27: Programme 6 Performance indicators and annual targets for 2015/16 -2017/18 ............... 83
Table 28: Programme 6 Quarterly targets for 2015/16 ........................................................................ 85
Table 29: Programme 6 Performance targets ....................................................................................... 86
Table 30: Programme 6 Economic classification ................................................................................... 86
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 5 of 156
DIRECTOR-GENERAL’S FOREWORD
The first Annual Performance Plan of the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE) signifies an
achievement in the Seven-Year Business Improvement Programme of the Department of Public
Works (DPW). As the custodian of the State’s assets that fall under the custodianship of Public
Works, the PMTE has the key objective of optimising the asset portfolio to ensure effective and
efficient cost saving service delivery in line with the National Development Plan (NDP).
To achieve this, a new interdisciplinary approach has been adopted, where greater synergies exist
between the DPW’s traditional property and asset management functions. The PMTE’s newly
developed business model regards Asset Management as a holistic approach with a key focused
investment mandate of ensuring that every asset complies with a lowered total cost of ownership
and higher returns. Providing a solid basis for developing this model, achievements in the
Stabilisation Phase of the Seven-Year Business Improvement Programme include: the renewal of 92%
of all expired leases in terms of the National Treasury dispensation; progressing from a disclaimed to
a qualified opinion on the PMTE account; and the development of an Immovable Asset Register for
the State which is 98% complete.
Over the planning period, projecting demand by establishing client needs is at the centre of the
PMTE’s business improvement strategy. The Department has been failing on this front and a new
“hands-on” approach in User-AMP management has been adopted. On the supply side, with the
Asset Registry in its finalisation stage, the Department has better knowledge of the accommodation
it controls, but without properly gauging its clients’ needs and predicting demand, it will not be able
to provide accommodation that is fit for purpose. As per the newly developed Business Model,
priority has been given in establishing a robust client liaison and servicing model with a client-centric
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 6 of 156
approach where expert teams will provide onsite technical support to client Departments primarily
to streamline the U-AMP/C-AMP processes.
From an asset investment point-of-view, the broader property market and the performance of the
PMTE portfolio have and will continually be analysed, with the view of maintaining and enhancing
value and leveraging the portfolio for economic development and job creation. Asset Management
will be a systematic, structured process that covers the entire life-cycle of assets, and requires insight
and expertise from diverse organisational disciplines in the ever changing real estate environment.
Along with monetary significance, the rising importance of asset management is fuelled by various
factors such as ageing buildings; changing stakeholder and service level requirements; increased
emphasis on health and safety; and new requirements by regulatory bodies etc.
With the expected infrastructure growth, there is also a need to improve all skills levels, from
artisans to graduate professionals in the property and construction sectors. As a major player in the
construction industry, creating sustainable jobs by building sustainable capacity and skills, will be
prioritised, so that funds allocated are effectively spent on the much-needed infrastructure.
Based on the above, the PMTE differentiates itself as being a modern and professional client-centric
and revenue focussed entity that considers business process modelling, strategy, risk, and
complexity, rather than simply the maintenance and management of properties. In this regard, five
focussed operational divisions have been established that will collectively realise the PMTE’s asset
management goals. The three core business divisions of the PMTE are: Real Estate Investment
Services; Real Estate Management Services; and Facilities Management Services with Real Estate
Information & Registry Services and Construction Project Management supporting the core business.
The Annual Performance Plan for the PMTE covers the second phase (Efficiency Enhancement Phase)
of the Seven-Year Business Improvement Programme for DPW, where the key focus areas that have
been identified include:
• Reducing the cost of doing business and the optimisation of state assets that fall under the
custodianship of the Minister of Public Works;
• Decreasing the number of leased-in properties depending on the availability and
appropriateness of current and new State stock which will address user-needs;
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 7 of 156
• Prioritising the development of functional assets as opposed to assets to be used as
residences or offices;
• Focussing on capital injection to refurbish buildings to extend their life and use;
• Facilitating procurement engagements and conducting aggregation of potential suppliers,
based on user-department’s basic facilities management needs;
• Implement strategies to incorporate water and energy efficiency into newly constructed
buildings and reducing demand on existing properties; and
• Empowering emerging black business, developing skills and creating employment
opportunities through the Construction, Real Estate and Facilities Management Programmes.
In the months ahead, as we continue implementing the Seven-Year Business Improvement
Programme and enter the first and pilot reporting period for the PMTE, we will continually monitor,
evaluate and refine our operations and outputs to ensure optimal efficiencies as we continue striving
towards improving service delivery both in terms of our mandate and in the context of Government’s
priorities.
Mr. M Dlabantu Director-General Department of Public Works
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 8 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
OFFICIAL SIGN-OFF
As part of the operationalisation process, this is the first ever comprehensive Annual Performance
Plan for the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE) produced by the Department of Public
Works (DPW) and distinguishes its implementation functions of the property and construction
project management from the policy and regulatory role of the DPW. The operationalisation of the
PMTE is one of the key pillars of the Turnaround of DPW that was initiated by the Minister in 2012.
Significant contributions from both internal and external stakeholders culminated into this ‘kick-start’
plan which reflects the aspiration to build and operate the PMTE against best practices of both public
and private sectors’ property and construction project management businesses. It is anticipated that
as we gain experience, the Annual Performance Plan will be refined and further developed. Special
thanks must be paid to the BIU staff and all those who worked tirelessly since 2012 to conceptualise
and develop the ‘kick-start’ business model and plans. We appreciate the contributions of National
Treasury, GTAC, DPSA, DPME, SAIBPP, STANLIB, CESA, the SACPCMP, and the AG.
It is hereby certified that the Annual Performance Plan was developed by the management of the
PMTE under the guidance of the Minister of Public Works and takes into account all the relevant
policies, legislation and other mandates for which Public Works and the PMTE are responsible. It
accurately reflects the strategic outcome orientated goals and objectives which the PMTE will
endeavour to achieve over the period 2015 - 2020.
Mr. Dhaya Govender Acting Head: PMTE
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 9 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016 OFFICIAL SIGN-OFF
Mr. M Dlabantu Director-General Department of Public Works Mr. J P Cronin, MP Deputy Minister of Public Works Approved by:
Mr. T W Nxesi, MP Minister of Public Works
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 10 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
MANCO SIGN-OFF
MANCO MEMBERS
P Chiapasco (Mr)
Act/DDG: Asset Investment Management
S Subban (Ms)
DDG: Inner City Regeneration
M Mabuza (Mr)
DDG: Key Accounts Management
N Vilakazi (Mr)
Act/DDG: Projects and Professional Services
B Mokgoro (Mr)
Chief Finance Officer
B Matutle (Mr)
DDG: Regional Coordination
S Matthews (Ms)
Act/ Head: Real Estate Registry
R Naidoo (Mr)
CD: Supply Chain Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 11 of 156
ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AIM Asset Investment Management
AG Accountant General
BBBEE Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
C-AMP Custodian Asset Management Plan
CBE Council for Built Environment
CEO Chief Executive Officer
CFO Chief Finance Office
CIO Chief Investment Officer
CIDB
Construction Industry Development Board
CCM User Centric Management
CPO Chief Procurement Officer
DCIO Deputy Chief Investment Officer
DG Director General
DMS Document Management System
DPSA Department of Public Service Administration
DPW Department of Public Works
DRDLR Department of Rural Development and Land Reform
EDMS Employee Development and Management System
ENE Estimates of National Expenditure
EPWP Expanded Public Works Programme
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 12 of 156
EXCO Executive Management Committee
FTE Full Time Equivalent
FM Facilities Management
FY Financial Year
GC Government Component
GIAMA Government Immovable Asset Management Plan
GRAP Generally Recognised Accounting Practice
HOD Head of Department
HOSS Head of Support Services
HR Human Resources
IAR Immovable Asset Register
IDT Independent Development Trust
ICT Information Communication Technology
IT Information Technology
IDIP Infrastructure Delivery Improvement Programme
KAM Key Account Management
LOGIS Logistical Information System
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MTBPS Mid Term Budget Policy Statement
MTEF Mid Term Expenditure Framework
MTSF Mid Term Strategic Framework
MIS Management Information System
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 13 of 156
NDPW National Department of Public Works
NT National Treasury
PFMA Public Finance Management Act
PMIS Property Management Information System
the PMTE Property Management Trading Entity
PSA Public Service Act
PSR Public Service Regulations
SA South Africa
SPA State Property Agency
SPMC State Property Management Corporation
SCM Supply Chain Management
SLA Service Level Agreement
SP Strategic Plan
SOE State Owned Entity
State assets Assets under the Custodianship of the Minister of Public Works
SPMA State Property Management Agency
TAU Technical Assistance Unit
U-AMP User Asset Management Plan
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 14 of 156
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 15 of 156
Page 15 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW (PLEASE REFER TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN)
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 1
6 o
f 15
6
1.
OV
ERV
IEW
OF
THE
20
15
/16
BU
DG
ET A
ND
MTE
F ES
TIM
ATE
S
1.1
Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
imat
es
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Ad
min
istr
atio
n
15
33
1
4 3
57
2
87
1
1 0
27
64
4
1 0
09
13
7
1 0
58
66
8
1 1
08
07
3
Rea
l Est
ate
Inve
stm
ent
Serv
ice
s -
- -
12
0 6
25
1
07
02
1
11
2 0
07
1
26
08
0
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Pro
ject
Man
agem
en
t 3
01
8 4
43
2
37
1 2
55
5
5 0
12
5
27
83
1
46
5 9
62
4
85
69
3
52
3 8
64
Rea
l Est
ate
Man
agem
ent
Serv
ice
s 4
01
4 8
11
4
12
8 2
94
4
82
4 6
94
5
35
9 7
24
5
72
0 3
52
6
15
2 4
26
6
63
3 0
46
Rea
l Est
ate
Info
rmat
ion
& R
egis
try
Serv
ices
4
12
45
4
- 1
83
7
73
8 6
48
1
66
2 4
69
1
66
4 7
49
1
67
0 3
25
Faci
litie
s M
anag
emen
t Se
rvic
es
3 3
44
11
7
3 2
87
16
3
2 5
31
24
1
2 9
84
99
8
2 8
03
65
6
2 8
12
98
0
2 9
19
29
1
Tota
l fo
r P
rogr
amm
es
10
80
5 1
56
9
79
1 0
69
7
41
5 6
55
1
0 7
59
47
0
11
76
8 5
97
1
2 2
86
52
3
12
98
0 6
79
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
1
0 1
08
89
7
9 2
96
74
5
6 7
33
21
8
9 7
99
30
8
10
71
2 4
19
1
1 1
24
72
7
11
70
2 7
03
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yees
1
2 8
93
1
24
7 4
79
1
28
8 7
73
1
36
9 2
34
1
47
4 3
50
Sala
rie
s an
d w
age
s 1
2 8
93
1
07
2 8
32
1
10
8 3
45
1
17
7 5
41
1
26
7 9
41
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
17
4 6
47
1
80
42
8
19
1 6
93
2
06
40
9
Go
od
s an
d s
erv
ices
9
66
8 1
90
9
02
5 0
73
6
03
9 4
12
7
45
7 2
15
7
39
8 8
75
7
70
5 0
08
8
15
0 8
77
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
6
38
1
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 1
7 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
2
2 3
00
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
1
57
9
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
8
67
5
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
7
00
0
11
90
0
50
0
50
0
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
erv
ices
: B
usi
ne
ss a
nd
ad
viso
ry s
ervi
ces
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
erv
ices
: In
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
pla
nn
ing
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
erv
ices
: Leg
al
cost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
3 0
17
95
7
2 4
04
42
6
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
1 7
11
Flee
t se
rvic
es
(in
clu
din
g go
vern
men
t m
oto
r tr
ansp
ort
)
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er
and
tea
cher
su
pp
ort
m
ater
ial
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
ed
ical
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
23
32
4
Co
nsu
mab
le s
up
plie
s
4
27
0
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 1
8 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
3 3
04
21
9
3 3
30
96
6
3 5
08
02
7
3 8
23
96
8
4 0
86
73
6
4 3
81
31
4
4 7
07
54
8
Rep
airs
an
d m
ain
ten
ance
3
13
3 2
69
3
11
9 3
00
2
33
8 6
84
2
45
2 0
40
2
25
2 7
98
2
23
1 5
45
2
30
5 5
55
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Tran
spo
rt p
rovi
de
d: D
ep
artm
en
tal a
ctiv
ity
94
0
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
ste
nce
5
5 1
53
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
me
nt
1 1
27
2
36
2
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
me
nt
55
86
6
Imm
ova
ble
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r
2
7 0
70
Fin
ance
& S
CM
su
stai
nab
ility
3
0 0
00
Bo
rder
Fe
nce
Bo
un
dar
ies
7 0
00
Irre
gula
r Ex
pe
nd
itu
re
9 1
21
Off
ice
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
5
16
31
3
Leas
e R
evie
w
4 1
00
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
ties
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Oth
er
21
1 6
18
1
68
01
9
19
2 7
01
1
17
4 2
07
2
73
13
8
1 0
91
64
9
1 1
37
27
4
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
14
85
6
14
10
1
15
43
9
15
71
6
16
92
9
18
23
7
19
64
7
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
3 9
88
1
88
0
2 7
39
2
00
0
2 1
16
2
23
9
2 3
69
Ren
t o
n la
nd
1
0 8
68
1
2 2
21
1
2 7
00
1
3 7
16
1
4 8
13
1
5 9
98
1
7 2
78
Loss
es f
rom
4
12
94
0
25
7 5
71
6
76
53
0
33
8 8
97
3
67
84
2
39
2 2
49
4
17
82
9
Ad
just
men
ts t
o f
air
valu
e o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
2
42
63
5
65
1 4
74
3
38
89
7
36
7 8
42
3
92
24
9
41
7 8
29
Imp
airm
ents
to
no
n-f
inan
cial
ass
ets
41
2 4
54
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 1
9 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
Oth
er
48
6
14
93
5
25
05
6
20
00
0
20
00
0
20
00
0
20
00
0
Dep
reci
atio
n
1 8
37
7
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s 6
96
27
7
49
4 3
24
6
82
43
7
96
0 1
62
1
05
6 1
78
1
16
1 7
96
1
27
7 9
76
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Pro
vin
ces
Pro
vin
cial
Rev
enu
e Fu
nd
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s 6
96
27
7
49
4 3
24
6
82
43
7
96
0 1
62
1
05
6 1
78
1
16
1 7
96
1
27
7 9
76
Mu
nic
ipal
ban
k ac
cou
nts
Dep
artm
en
tal a
gen
cies
an
d a
cco
un
ts
Dep
artm
en
tal a
gen
cies
(n
on
-bu
sin
ess
enti
ties
)
Fore
ign
go
vern
me
nts
an
d in
tern
atio
nal
o
rgan
isat
ion
s
Pu
blic
co
rpo
rati
on
s an
d p
riva
te e
nte
rpri
ses
Pu
blic
co
rpo
rati
on
s
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
pu
blic
co
rpo
rati
on
s
Pri
vate
en
terp
rise
s
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
pri
vate
en
terp
rise
s
No
n-p
rofi
t in
stit
uti
on
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
2 6
00
75
1
3 4
95
86
4
4 9
32
91
6
5 4
15
67
0
5 7
70
30
4
Bu
ildin
gs a
nd
oth
er
fixe
d s
tru
ctu
res
2 6
00
75
1
3 4
95
86
4
4 9
02
22
3
5 3
78
25
6
5 7
31
99
5
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
0 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
Bu
ildin
gs
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
3
0 6
93
3
7 4
14
3
8 3
09
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
en
t
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
1
0 8
05
15
6
9 7
91
06
9
7 4
15
65
5
13
29
5 1
72
1
5 6
45
33
5
16
54
0 3
97
1
7 4
73
00
7
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
1 o
f 15
6
1.2
R
ela
tin
g e
xpen
dit
ure
tre
nd
s to
str
ate
gic
goal
s Th
e P
rogr
amm
e B
ud
get
Stru
ctu
re f
or
the
PM
TE w
as r
evis
ed i
n i
ts e
nti
rety
fo
llow
ing
the
op
erat
ion
alis
atio
n o
f th
e P
MTE
wh
ich
was
ap
pro
ved
by
Cab
inet
du
rin
g A
ugu
st 2
01
4. A
s a
resu
lt s
ix n
ew P
rogr
amm
es w
ere
crea
ted
to
rep
lace
th
e O
bje
ctiv
es u
sed
pre
vio
usl
y. T
he
vari
ou
s ex
pen
dit
ure
item
s
we
re r
eallo
cate
d a
nd
th
e b
ud
get
com
ple
tely
res
tru
ctu
red
to
be
alig
ned
to
th
ese
new
Pro
gram
mes
des
ign
ed t
ow
ard
s ac
hie
vin
g th
e o
bje
ctiv
e o
f
pro
vid
ing
use
r ce
ntr
ic
pro
fess
ion
al
pro
per
ty
and
fa
cilit
ies
man
agem
ent
serv
ices
to
ef
fect
ivel
y m
eet
use
r d
epar
tmen
ts’
acco
mm
od
atio
n
req
uir
emen
ts.
As
the
bu
dge
ts f
or
the
KA
M,
AIM
, P
roje
cts
and
Pro
fess
ion
al S
ervi
ces,
Fin
ance
an
d I
CR
bra
nch
es h
ave
bee
n t
ran
sfer
red
fro
m t
he
mai
n v
ote
to
th
e
PM
TE a
s p
art
of
op
erat
ion
alis
ing
the
PM
TE, t
he
emp
loye
es
in t
hes
e b
ran
ches
will
be
com
pen
sate
d b
y th
e P
MTE
. As
the
PM
TE d
oes
no
t h
ave
its
ow
n
PER
SAL,
yet
DP
W w
ill p
ay t
he
emp
loye
e c
ost
an
d t
hen
rec
ove
r it
fro
m t
he
PM
TE. C
om
pen
sati
on
fo
r em
plo
yees
was
no
t p
aid
by
the
PM
TE p
revi
ou
sly
and
th
eref
ore
rep
rese
nts
a s
ign
ific
ant
incr
ease
fro
m 2
01
4/1
5.
The
goo
ds
and
ser
vice
s as
soci
ated
wit
h t
hes
e b
ran
ches
are
als
o t
ran
sfer
red
fro
m t
he
mai
n v
ote
to
th
e P
MTE
an
d r
epre
sen
t a
sign
ific
ant
incr
ease
fro
m 2
01
4/15
as
thes
e w
ere
pai
d b
y D
PW
pre
vio
usl
y.
Fro
m 1
Ap
ril
201
3 a
ll im
mo
vab
le a
sset
s w
ere
tra
nsf
erre
d f
rom
th
e m
ain
vo
te t
o t
he
PM
TE a
s th
e tr
adin
g en
tity
ch
ange
d i
ts r
epo
rtin
g fr
amew
ork
fro
m t
he
cash
bas
is t
o G
RA
P.
This
res
ult
ed i
n a
ll st
ate
ow
ned
pro
per
tie
s b
ein
g re
flec
ted
on
th
e P
MTE
's S
tate
men
t o
f Fi
nan
cial
Po
siti
on
. A
ser
vice
pro
vid
er w
as a
pp
oin
ted
to
co
mp
ile a
GR
AP
co
mp
lian
t im
mo
vab
le a
sset
reg
iste
r b
y 3
1 M
arch
20
17
, an
d t
her
efo
re t
he
tota
l ass
et b
ase
will
gro
w f
rom
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
2 o
f 15
6
R6
.3 b
illio
n in
20
13/1
4 to
an
est
imat
ed R
71.7
bill
ion
in 2
01
7/1
8 o
nce
th
e va
luat
ion
of
all i
mm
ova
ble
ass
ets
hav
e b
een
fin
alis
ed p
er D
irec
tive
2.
This
sign
ific
ant
gro
wth
in t
he
asse
t b
ase
is d
irec
tly
linke
d t
o t
he
sign
ific
ant
gro
wth
in d
epre
ciat
ion
fro
m R
1.8
mill
ion
in 2
01
3/1
4 t
o R
1.6
bill
ion
in 2
01
7/1
8.
Fin
ance
co
sts
are
exp
ecte
d t
o i
ncr
ease
bas
ed o
n t
he
CP
I in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
ren
t o
n l
and
to
gro
w b
y 8
% p
er y
ear
in l
ine
wit
h t
he
tren
d f
or
acco
mm
od
atio
n c
har
ges.
Tran
sfer
s an
d s
ub
sid
ies
are
the
amo
un
t p
aid
to
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s fo
r p
rop
erty
rat
es
on
sta
te o
wn
ed p
rop
erty
. Th
is w
ill v
ary
ann
ual
ly b
ased
on
th
e
nu
mb
er o
f p
rop
erti
es a
nd
val
uat
ion
s co
nfi
rmed
as
par
t o
f th
e co
mp
ilati
on
of
the
GR
AP
co
mp
lian
t im
mo
vab
le a
sset
reg
iste
r.
Ther
e w
ere
sig
nif
ican
t m
ove
men
ts f
rom
201
1/12
to
20
13
/14
bet
wee
n t
he
app
rove
d b
ud
get
figu
res
and
th
e au
dit
ed o
utc
om
e fi
gure
s d
ue
to t
he
retr
osp
ecti
ve a
pp
licat
ion
of
the
bra
nch
es t
ran
sfer
red
fro
m D
PW
to
th
e P
MTE
as
par
t o
f o
per
atio
nal
isin
g th
e P
MTE
.
PMTE – STRATEGIC PLAN Page 23 of 156
Page 23 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
PART B: PROGRAMME AND
SUB-PROGRAMME PLANS
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 24 of 156
The PMTE PROGRAMME STRUCTURE
Overall programme structure
Programme Sub-programme
1. Administration A Management Leadership
B Operations Support Management (COO)
C Financial and Accounting Management
D Supply Chain Management
2. Real Estate Investment
Management
A User Demand Management
B Planning and Precinct Development Services
C
Property Performance Management
Investment Analysis
3. Construction Project
Management
A Construction Project Planning
B Construction Project Management
4. Real Estate Management A Management of Freehold Property
Land Administration & Management
B Surplus Freehold (Revenue) Management
Leasehold Management
5. Real Estate Information
& Registry Services
A Asset Registry Services
Conveyancing
6. Facilities Management A Scheduled Maintenance
SHERQ Management
B Unscheduled Maintenance Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 25 of 156
PMTE
PROGRAMME 2:
Real Estate Investment
Sub-Programme 2.1
User Demand Management
Sub-Programme 2.2
Planning & Precinct Development
Sub-Programme 2.3
Property Performance Management
Sub-Programme 2.4
Investment Analysis
PROGRAMME 3:
Construction Project
Management
Sub-Programme 3.1
Construction Project Planning
Sub-Programme 3.2
Construction Project Management
PROGRAMME 4:
Real Estate Management
Sub-Programme 4.1
Management of Freehold Property
Sub-Programme 4.2 Land Administration
& Management
Sub-Programme 4.3 Surplus Freehold
(Revenue) Management
Sub-Programme 4.4.
Leasehold Management
PROGRAMME 5:
Real Estate Registry
Sub-Programme 5.1.
Asset Registry Management
Sub-Programme 5.2
Conveyancing
PROGRAMME 6:
Facilities Management
Sub-Programme 6.1
Scheduled Maintenance
Sub-Programme 6.2
SHERQ Management
Sub-Programme 6.3
Unscheduled Maintenance Management
PROGRAMME 1:
Administration
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
6 o
f 15
6
1.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 1
: A
DM
INIS
TRA
TIO
N
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: P
rovi
de
lead
ersh
ip, s
trat
egic
man
agem
ent,
go
vern
ance
an
d a
dm
inis
trat
ive
sup
po
rt t
o t
he
Pro
per
ty M
anag
emen
t Tr
adin
g En
tity
(PM
TE).
1.1
P
rogr
amm
e 1
: Str
ateg
ic o
bje
ctiv
e a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Ta
ble
1: P
rogr
amm
e 1
Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
ann
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 -
20
17
/18
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
1.1
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
To p
rovi
de
lead
ersh
ip,
stra
tegi
c m
anag
emen
t,
gove
rnan
ce a
nd
su
pp
ort
Ap
pro
ved
st
rate
gic
pla
n a
nd
an
nu
al
per
form
ance
pla
ns
A
pp
rove
d
stra
tegi
c p
lan
an
d 2
01
5/1
6
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
P
lan
Ap
pro
ved
2
01
6/1
7 A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce P
lan
Ap
pro
ved
2
01
7/1
8 A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce P
lan
Ap
pro
ved
2
01
8/1
9 A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce
Pla
n
1.1
.B
OP
ERA
TIO
NS
SUP
PO
RT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
2
To p
rovi
de
stra
tegi
c o
per
atio
ns
sup
po
rt s
ervi
ces
99
%
Info
rmat
ion
C
om
mu
nic
atio
ns
Tech
no
logy
(IC
T)
Infr
astr
uct
ure
N
etw
ork
an
d
Serv
ices
p
rovi
ded
*
9
0%
9
2%
9
4%
9
6%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
7 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
10
0%
Leg
al
Serv
ices
, su
pp
ort
an
d a
dvi
ce
pro
vid
ed w
ith
in
the
stip
ula
ted
ti
mef
ram
es
5
0%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
Vac
ancy
rat
e o
f le
ss t
han
10
%
2
2.2
8%
va
can
cy r
ate
2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vaca
ncy
rat
e 2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vaca
ncy
rat
e 2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vac
ancy
rat
e
1.1
.C
FIN
AN
CIA
L A
ND
AC
CO
UN
TIN
G M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
3
To e
nsu
re
effe
ctiv
e an
d
sou
nd
fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent
Cle
an a
ud
it
ou
tco
me
Neg
ativ
e
aud
it
ou
tco
me
Neg
ativ
e au
dit
ou
tco
me
Neg
ativ
e au
dit
ou
tco
me
(wit
h
imp
rove
men
t)
Imp
rove
d a
ud
it
ou
tco
me
Cle
an a
ud
it
ou
tco
me
Cle
an a
ud
it
ou
tco
me
Cle
an a
ud
it
ou
tco
me
1.1
.D
SUP
PLY
CH
AIN
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
4
To p
rovi
de
an
effi
cien
t an
d
effe
ctiv
e Su
pp
ly
Ch
ain
M
anag
eme
nt
Serv
ice
Incr
ease
d
effi
cien
cie
s in
ad
dre
ssin
g re
qu
isit
ion
s fo
r ac
qu
irin
g re
sou
rces
wit
hin
th
e le
gisl
ated
tim
e fr
ames
Dis
clai
med
A
ud
it
Ou
tco
me
Dis
clai
med
Au
dit
O
utc
om
e Q
ual
ifie
d A
ud
it
Ou
tco
me
50
%
60
%
70
%
80
%
*Th
e p
rovi
sio
n o
f IC
T sy
stem
s fo
r en
d u
ser
acce
ss a
s p
er
the
ir o
per
atio
nal
req
uir
emen
ts a
nd
fu
nct
ion
al u
se (
up
tim
e).
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
8 o
f 15
6
1.2
P
rogr
amm
e 1
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 2
: Pro
gram
me
1 P
erfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/20
16
-2
01
7/1
8
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
1.2
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
An
nu
al P
erfo
rman
ce
Pla
n(s
) ap
pro
ved
w
ith
in t
he
legi
slat
ed
tim
e fr
ame
DP
W P
lan
ap
pro
ved
w
ith
in le
gisl
ated
ti
me
fram
e*
DP
W P
lan
ap
pro
ved
w
ith
in le
gisl
ated
ti
me
fram
e*
DP
W P
lan
ap
pro
ved
wit
hin
le
gisl
ated
tim
e fr
ame*
20
15
/16
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
Pla
n
app
rove
d w
ith
in
legi
slat
ed t
ime
fram
e*
20
16
/17
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
Pla
n
app
rove
d
20
17
/18
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
Pla
n
app
rove
d
20
18
/19
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
Pla
n
app
rove
d
2
An
nu
al P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
ap
pro
ved
D
PW
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
R
epo
rts
app
rove
d*
DP
W A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
s n
ot
ap
pro
ved
*
DP
W A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
s ap
pro
ved
w
ith
re
serv
atio
ns*
DP
W A
nn
ual
P
erfo
rman
ce R
epo
rts
app
rove
d*
20
14
/15
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
Rep
ort
ap
pro
ved
*
20
15
/16
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
R
epo
rt a
pp
rove
d
20
16
/17
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
R
epo
rt a
pp
rove
d
3
Qu
arte
rly
Per
form
ance
Rep
ort
s ap
pro
ved
DP
W Q
uar
terl
y P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
s ap
pro
ved
*
DP
W Q
uar
terl
y P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
s n
ot
app
rove
d*
DP
W Q
uar
terl
y P
erfo
rman
ce
Rep
ort
s ap
pro
ved
w
ith
re
serv
atio
ns*
DP
W Q
uar
terl
y P
erfo
rman
ce R
epo
rts
app
rove
d*
Qu
arte
rly
per
form
ance
re
po
rts
app
rove
d*
Qu
arte
rly
Per
form
ance
Rep
ort
s ap
pro
ved
Qu
arte
rly
Per
form
ance
R
epo
rts
app
rove
d
1.2
.B
OP
ERA
TIO
NS
SUP
PO
RT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
4
Per
cen
tage
of
tim
e th
e n
etw
ork
is
avai
lab
le f
or
bu
sin
ess
use
9
0%
9
2%
9
4%
9
6%
5
Per
cen
tage
of
ICT
infr
astr
uct
ure
av
aila
ble
fo
r b
usi
nes
s u
se
9
0%
9
2%
9
4%
9
6%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 2
9 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
6
Per
cen
tage
of
ICT
SLA
co
mm
itm
ents
ac
hie
ved
(B
usi
ne
ss
Ap
plic
atio
ns)
5
0%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
7
Per
cen
tage
of
lega
l o
pin
ion
s an
d
con
trac
ts f
orm
ula
ted
w
ith
in 5
wo
rkin
g d
ays
of
req
ues
t
5
0%
6
0%
7
0%
8
0%
8
Per
cen
tage
red
uct
ion
in
vac
ancy
rat
e
2
2.2
8%
vac
ancy
rat
e
25
% R
edu
ctio
n in
va
can
cy r
ate
2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vaca
ncy
rat
e 2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vaca
ncy
rat
e
9
Per
cen
tage
of
Staf
f d
evel
op
ed
on
sp
ecia
lised
ski
lls
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
50
%
60
%
70
%
1.2
.C
FIN
AN
CIA
L A
ND
AC
CO
UN
TIN
G M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
10
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
voic
es
pai
d w
ith
in 3
0 d
ays
of
rece
ipt
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
80
%
90
%
10
0%
11
P
erce
nta
ge r
edu
ctio
n
in t
he
de
bto
rs b
alan
ce
(R1
.8b
illio
n a
s at
1st
A
pri
l 20
14
)
3
8%
of
R1
.8b
illio
n
20
% o
f R
1.8
bill
ion
2
0%
of
R1
.8b
illio
n
20
% o
f R
1.8
bill
ion
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
0 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
12
P
erce
nta
ge r
eco
very
in t
he
de
bto
rs c
urr
en
t
year
bal
ance
8
5%
9
0%
9
2%
9
4%
13
Es
tim
ate
of
Nat
ion
al
Exp
end
itu
re (
ENE)
su
pp
ort
ing
do
cum
ents
(d
atab
ase
and
n
arra
tive
) su
bm
itte
d
wit
hin
re
gula
ted
ti
mef
ram
es t
o
Nat
ion
al T
reas
ury
Sub
mit
ted
an
d
pu
blis
hed
Sub
mit
ted
an
d
pu
blis
hed
Sub
mit
ted
an
d
pu
blis
hed
Sub
mit
ted
an
d
pu
blis
hed
Esti
mat
e o
f N
atio
nal
Exp
end
itu
re (
ENE)
sup
po
rtin
g
do
cum
ents
(d
atab
ase
and
nar
rati
ve)
sub
mit
ted
wit
hin
regu
late
d t
imef
ram
es
to N
atio
nal
Tre
asu
ry
Esti
mat
e o
f N
atio
nal
Exp
end
itu
re (
ENE)
sup
po
rtin
g
do
cum
ents
(
dat
abas
e an
d
nar
rati
ve)
sub
mit
ted
wit
hin
re
gula
ted
tim
efra
mes
to
Nat
ion
al T
reas
ury
Esti
mat
e o
f
Nat
ion
al
Exp
end
itu
re (
ENE)
sup
po
rtin
g
do
cum
ents
(dat
abas
e an
d
nar
rati
ve)
sub
mit
ted
wit
hin
regu
late
d
tim
efra
mes
to
Nat
ion
al T
reas
ury
1.2
.D
SUP
PLY
CH
AIN
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
14
P
erce
nta
ge o
f b
ids
awar
ded
wit
hin
56
w
ork
ing
day
s o
f te
nd
er c
losu
re
1 1
13
b
ids
wer
e aw
ard
ed
in 2
01
1/1
2 f
or
PM
TE
84
b
ids
wer
e aw
ard
ed
in 2
01
2/1
3 f
or
bo
th
PM
TE a
nd
DP
W
16
1
bid
s w
ere
awar
ded
in
20
13
/14
fo
r P
MTE
20
%
50
%
60
%
70
%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
1 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
15
1
10
.% (
mar
ket
rela
ted
p
rice
+ 1
0%
p
refe
ren
tial
pre
miu
m)
ach
ieve
d in
p
urc
has
ing
goo
ds,
se
rvic
es o
r w
ork
s
R 3
, 56
8, 9
50
, 07
7
was
th
e p
rocu
rem
ent
spe
nd
fo
r P
MTE
R 2
13
, 62
6, 8
00
was
th
e p
rocu
rem
ent
spen
d f
or
bo
th
PM
TE a
nd
DP
W
R 1
, 89
3, 6
18
, 44
7
was
th
e p
rocu
rem
ent
spen
d f
or
PM
TE
16
0%
1
40
%
13
0%
1
10
%
16
A
vera
ge v
aria
tio
n o
n
all c
on
trac
ts e
xecu
ted
A
vera
ge v
aria
tio
n
8.3
7%
A
vera
ge v
aria
tio
n
5.0
5%
A
vera
ge v
aria
tio
n
6.4
2%
1
5%
1
0%
7
.5%
5
%
P
MTE
per
form
ance
rep
ort
ed f
or
in D
PW
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
2 o
f 15
6
1.3
P
rogr
amm
e 1
: Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 3
: Pro
gram
me
1 Q
uar
terl
y ta
rget
s fo
r 2
015/
16
Perf
orm
an
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
peri
od
A
nn
ual
Targ
et
2015
/16
Q
uart
erl
y T
arg
ets
1st
2n
d
3rd
4
th
1.3
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1.
An
nu
al p
erf
orm
ance
pla
n
dev
elo
pe
d a
nd
ap
pro
ved
wit
hin
th
e le
gisl
ated
tim
e
An
nu
ally
A
nn
ual
pe
rfo
rman
ce
pla
n(s
) d
evel
op
ed
an
d
app
rove
d w
ith
in t
he
legi
slat
ed t
ime
A
pp
rove
d 1
st D
raft
2
01
6/1
7 A
PP
A
pp
rove
d 2
nd
Dra
ft
20
16
/17
AP
P
Ap
pro
ved
20
16
/17
A
PP
2.
Ap
pro
ved
qu
arte
rly
per
form
ance
re
po
rts
Qu
arte
rly
Ap
pro
ved
qu
arte
rly
per
form
ance
re
po
rts
4
th Q
uar
ter
of
20
14
/15
ap
pro
ved
1
st Q
uar
ter
of
20
15
/16
ap
pro
ved
2
nd
Qu
arte
r o
f 2
01
5/1
6 a
pp
rove
d
3rd
Qu
arte
r o
f 2
01
5/1
6 a
pp
rove
d
3
Ap
pro
ved
an
nu
al p
erf
orm
ance
re
po
rt
An
nu
ally
A
pp
rove
d a
nn
ual
p
erfo
rman
ce r
ep
ort
Q
1; Q
2; Q
3 o
f 2
01
4/1
5 r
epo
rts
con
solid
ated
Q1
; Q2
; Q3
;Q4
of
20
14
/15
rep
ort
s co
nso
lidat
ed
An
nu
al
Per
form
ance
R
epo
rt 2
01
4/1
5
app
rove
d
1.3
.B
OP
ERA
TIO
NS
SUP
PO
RT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
4
Per
cen
tage
of
tim
e th
e n
etw
ork
is
avai
lab
le f
or
bu
sin
ess
use
Q
uar
terl
y 9
0%
9
2%
9
2%
9
2%
9
2%
5
Per
cen
tage
of
ICT
infr
astr
uct
ure
av
aila
ble
fo
r b
usi
nes
s u
se
Qu
arte
rly
90
%
92
%
92
%
92
%
92
%
6
Per
cen
tage
of
ICT
SLA
co
mm
itm
ents
ac
hie
ved
(B
usi
ne
ss A
pp
licat
ion
s)
Qu
arte
rly
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
7
Per
cen
tage
of
lega
l op
inio
ns
and
co
ntr
acts
fo
rmu
late
d w
ith
in 5
w
ork
ing
day
s o
f re
qu
est
Qu
arte
rly
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
8
Per
cen
tage
red
uct
ion
in v
acan
cy
rate
Q
uar
terl
y 2
5%
Red
uct
ion
in
vaca
ncy
Rat
e 2
5%
2
5%
2
5%
2
5%
9
Per
cen
tage
of
Staf
f d
evel
op
ed
on
sp
ecia
lised
ski
lls
Qu
arte
rly
50
%
Skill
s au
dit
En
gage
me
nt
wit
h
trai
nin
g in
stit
uti
on
s
Dev
elo
p t
rain
ing
pla
n
Trai
nin
g im
ple
me
nta
tio
n
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
3 o
f 15
6
Perf
orm
an
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
peri
od
A
nn
ual
Targ
et
2015
/16
Q
uart
erl
y T
arg
ets
1st
2n
d
3rd
4
th
1.3
.C
FIN
AN
CIA
L A
ND
AC
CO
UN
TIN
G M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
10
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
voic
es p
aid
wit
hin
30
day
s o
f re
ceip
t
Qu
arte
rly
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
11
P
erce
nta
ge c
han
ge in
th
e d
eb
tors
bal
ance
(R
1.8
bill
ion
as
at 1
st A
pri
l
20
14
)
Qu
arte
rly
2
0%
of
1.8
bill
ion
0%
of
R1
.8b
illio
n
10
% o
f R
1.8
bill
ion
1
5%
of
R1
.8b
illio
n
20
% o
f R
1.8
bill
ion
12
P
erce
nta
ge r
eco
very
in t
he
de
bto
rs
curr
ent
year
bal
ance
Qu
arte
rly
90
%
60
%
70
%
80
%
90
%
13
Es
tim
ate
of
Nat
ion
al E
xpen
dit
ure
(E
NE)
su
pp
ort
ing
do
cum
ents
(
dat
abas
e an
d n
arra
tive
) s
ub
mit
ted
w
ith
in r
egu
late
d t
imef
ram
es t
o
Nat
ion
al T
reas
ury
An
nu
ally
Su
bm
itte
d E
NE
do
cum
ent
In
dic
ativ
e b
ud
get
and
ad
dit
ion
al
req
uir
eme
nts
d
eter
min
ed
by
MA
NC
O
MTE
F d
ocu
men
ts
app
rove
d b
y th
e A
cco
un
tin
g O
ffic
er
Firs
t a
nd
Sec
on
d
dra
ft E
NE
Do
cum
ent
sub
mit
ted
to
N
atio
nal
Tre
asu
ry
Fin
al E
NE
Do
cum
ent
sub
mit
ted
to
N
atio
nal
Tre
asu
ry
1.3
.D
SUP
PLY
CH
AIN
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
14
P
erce
nta
ge o
f b
ids
awar
de
d w
ith
in
56
wo
rkin
g d
ays
of
ten
der
clo
sure
Q
uar
terl
y 5
0%
5
0%
5
0%
5
0%
5
0%
15
1
10
.% (
mar
ket
rela
ted
pri
ce +
10
%
pre
fere
nti
al p
rem
ium
) ac
hie
ved
in
pu
rch
asin
g go
od
s, s
ervi
ces
or
wo
rks
Qu
arte
rly
14
0%
1
40
%
14
0%
1
40
%
14
0%
16
A
vera
ge v
aria
tio
n o
n a
ll co
ntr
acts
ex
ecu
ted
Q
uar
terl
y 1
0%
1
0%
1
0%
1
0%
1
0%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
4 o
f 15
6
1.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 4
: Pro
gram
me
1 P
erfo
rman
ce T
arge
ts
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Man
agem
ent
Op
erat
ion
s Su
pp
ort
Man
age
men
t
Fin
anci
al a
nd
Acc
ou
nti
ng
Man
agem
ent
Sup
ply
Ch
ain
Man
agem
ent
Tota
l 1
5 3
31
4
35
7
2 8
71
1
02
7 6
44
1
00
9 1
37
1
05
8 6
68
1
10
8 0
73
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
5 o
f 15
6
Tab
le 5
: Pro
gram
me
1 E
con
om
ic c
lass
ific
atio
n
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
1
5 3
31
4
35
7
2 8
71
1
02
7 6
44
1
00
9 1
37
1
05
8 6
68
1
10
8 0
73
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s 1
2 8
93
3
18
21
2
33
3 5
95
3
66
65
3
39
5 0
22
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
1
2 8
93
2
73
66
2
28
6 8
92
3
15
32
2
33
9 7
19
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
44
55
0
46
70
3
51
33
1
55
30
3
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
2 4
38
2
47
7
13
2
70
7 4
32
6
73
42
6
68
9 7
76
7
10
68
2
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
4
40
2
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
2
2 3
00
Fin
ance
& S
CM
su
stai
nab
ility
3
0 0
00
Bo
rder
Fen
ce B
ou
nd
arie
s
7
00
0
Irre
gula
r Ex
pen
dit
ure
9
12
1
Off
ice
Acc
om
mo
dat
ion
5
16
31
3
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
8
80
Co
nsu
mer
Su
pp
lies
1 7
61
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
2
64
1
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
7
00
0
8 4
23
5
00
5
00
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d a
dvi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
In
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
pla
nn
ing
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
6 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al
cost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
44
0
Fle
et s
ervi
ces
(in
clu
din
g go
vern
men
t m
oto
r tr
ansp
ort
)
1
76
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
4
0 7
60
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
17
60
7
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
11
44
4
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t 1
12
7
2 3
62
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Oth
er
1 3
11
1
15
1
32
7
00
43
2
15
8
68
9 2
76
7
10
18
2
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
7 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
1 8
80
2
73
9
2 0
00
2
11
6
2 2
39
2
36
9
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l 1
5 3
31
4
35
7
2 8
71
1
02
7 6
44
1
00
9 1
37
1
05
8 6
68
1
10
8 0
73
Per
form
an
ce a
nd
exp
end
itu
re t
ren
ds
for
Pro
gra
mm
e 1
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
8 o
f 15
6
2.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 2
: R
EAL
ESTA
TE IN
VES
TMEN
T M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: T
o a
chie
ve a
n e
ffic
ien
t an
d c
om
pet
itiv
e R
eal
Est
ate
Po
rtfo
lio f
or
the
Stat
e t
hro
ugh
eff
ecti
ve p
lan
nin
g, a
nal
ysis
an
d in
form
ed
inve
stm
ents
. 2
.1
Pro
gram
me
2: S
trat
egi
c o
bje
ctiv
e a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Ta
ble
6: P
rogr
amm
e 2
Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
ann
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Tar
get
(5
year
tar
get)
A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
2.1
.A
USE
R D
EMA
ND
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
To d
evel
op
pla
ns
and
str
ateg
ies
to
mee
t se
rvic
e
del
ive
ry
acco
mm
od
atio
n
req
uir
eme
nts
(UA
MP
S) o
f u
ser
dep
artm
ents
42
Use
r A
sset
Man
agem
ent
Pla
ns
(UA
MP
) co
mp
iled
ann
ual
ly
50
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
s
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
38
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
s
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
43
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
s
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
42
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
s
tem
pla
tes
(1-1
2)
for
FY 2
01
6/1
7
com
pile
d
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
17
/18
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
18
/19
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
19
/20
2.1
.B
PLA
NN
ING
AN
D P
REC
INC
T D
EVE
LOP
MEN
T SE
RV
ICES
2
To p
rovi
de
bu
ilt
envi
ron
me
nt
pla
nn
ing
serv
ice
s fo
r
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
on
sta
te
acco
mm
od
atio
n
40
pre
cin
ct d
evel
op
me
nt
pro
po
sals
inte
grat
ed in
to
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s sp
atia
l
dev
elo
pm
en
t fr
amew
ork
(SD
F)
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
6
8
9
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 3
9 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Tar
get
(5
year
tar
get)
A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
2.1
.C
INV
ESTM
ENT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
IN
VES
TMEN
T A
NA
LYSI
S
3
To e
nsu
re o
pti
mu
m
uti
lisat
ion
an
d
incr
ease
d v
alu
e o
f
stat
e as
sets
th
rou
gh
sou
nd
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
13
89
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d (
to p
rovi
de
Use
r
Dep
artm
en
t’s
serv
ice
del
ive
ry a
cco
mm
od
atio
n)
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
51
3
35
9
26
4
4
To d
eplo
y la
nd
to
mee
t N
atio
nal
Stra
tegi
c P
rio
riti
es
10
Lan
d p
arce
ls
app
rove
d f
or
nat
ion
al
pri
ori
tie
s
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
2
2
2
5
To c
on
trib
ute
to
adva
nce
men
t o
f
soci
al e
con
om
ic
dev
elo
pm
en
t an
d
BB
BEE
50
0 o
f va
can
t fr
ee h
old
pro
per
ties
ap
pro
ved
fo
r re
dev
elo
pm
en
t b
y B
BB
EE
pro
per
ty d
evel
op
ers
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r 1
00
1
00
1
00
PR
OP
ERTY
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T (R
ESEA
RC
H)
6
To m
anag
e th
e
per
form
ance
of
pro
per
ty f
or
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
10
50
0 b
uild
ings
per
form
ance
mea
sure
d
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
30
0
70
0
15
00
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
0 o
f 15
6
2.2
P
rogr
amm
e 2
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 7
: Pro
gram
me
2 P
erfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
2.2
.A
USE
R D
EMA
ND
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
Nu
mb
er
of
com
ple
ted
Use
r
Ass
et
Man
agem
ent
Pla
ns
(UA
MP
’s)
for
use
r
dep
artm
ents
50
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
38
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
43
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
tem
pla
tes
com
ple
ted
42
use
r
dep
artm
ents
UA
MP
tem
pla
tes
(1-1
2)
for
FY
20
16
/17
co
mp
iled
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
17
/18
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
18
/19
42
UA
MP
s fo
r
20
19
/20
2
Nu
mb
er
of
Serv
ice
Leve
l
Agr
eem
ents
dev
elo
ped
in
line
wit
h n
ew S
ervi
ce
Del
iver
y St
and
ard
s (S
DS)
Per
cen
tage
of
Serv
ice
Leve
l
Agr
eem
ents
man
age
d in
line
wit
h n
ew S
ervi
ce
Del
iver
y St
and
ard
s (S
DS)
3
0 S
LA’s
dev
elo
pe
d
51
SLA
’s d
eve
lop
ed
10
0%
man
aged
10
0%
man
aged
3
Per
cen
tage
of
use
r
dep
artm
ents
Fra
mew
ork
Agr
eem
ents
co
ncl
ud
ed
fo
r
the
use
of
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ties
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r 8
0-1
00
%
80
-10
0%
8
0-1
00
%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
1 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
2.2
.B
PLA
NN
ING
AN
D P
REC
INC
T D
EVE
LOP
MEN
T SE
RV
ICES
4
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct
dev
elo
pm
en
t p
rop
osa
ls
pro
du
ced
fo
r H
ead
Off
ices
in T
shw
ane
Agr
ivaa
l bu
ildin
g co
ntr
act
awar
ded
Agr
ivaa
l bu
ildin
g
allo
cate
d f
or
refu
rbis
hm
ent
as
DP
SA
acco
mm
od
atio
n
Stat
s SA
sit
e
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Pla
n
and
bu
ildin
g
con
cep
t p
rod
uce
d
8 H
ead
Off
ice
dev
elo
pm
en
t o
pp
ort
un
itie
s id
enti
fie
d a
t Sa
lvo
kop
3
Hea
d O
ffic
e o
pp
ort
un
itie
s id
enti
fie
d in
th
e In
ner
Cit
y
Tsh
wan
e St
atu
s Q
uo
Mac
ro
Fram
ewo
rk
com
ple
ted
3
Hea
d O
ffic
e
Loca
tio
n p
rop
osa
ls
pro
du
ced
2
2
3
5
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct
dev
elo
pm
en
t p
rop
osa
ls
pro
du
ced
fo
r m
etro
s an
d
dis
tric
t m
un
icip
alit
ies
4
2
2
2
6
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct
dev
elo
pm
en
t p
rop
osa
ls
pro
du
ced
fo
r lo
cal/
rura
l
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
D
PW
infr
astr
uct
ure
pla
ns
inte
grat
ed
wit
h s
ecto
r
dep
artm
ents
an
d
IDP
s o
f fi
ve r
ura
l
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
2
4
4
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
2 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
2.2
.C
INV
ESTM
ENT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
IN
VES
TMEN
T A
NA
LYSI
S
7
Per
cen
tage
incr
ease
in t
he
valu
e o
f th
e im
mo
vab
le
asse
t p
ort
folio
*9
0.5
bill
ion
2
%
2%
2
%
8
Per
cen
tage
of
pre
limin
ary
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d w
ith
in 3
mo
nth
s
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ue
st
5
0%
7
5%
8
0%
8
5%
9
Per
cen
tage
of
inve
stm
en
t
solu
tio
ns
for
con
stru
ctio
n
app
rove
d w
ith
in 2
4
mo
nth
s fr
om
dat
e o
f
req
ues
t
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r 7
5%
8
0%
8
5%
10
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
solu
tio
ns
for
refu
rbis
hm
ents
ap
pro
ved
wit
hin
6 m
on
ths
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ues
t
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r 7
5%
8
0%
8
5%
11
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
solu
tio
n f
or
leas
eh
old
an
d
surp
lus
free
ho
ld a
pp
rove
d
wit
hin
1 m
on
th f
rom
dat
e
of
req
ues
t
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r 7
5%
8
0%
8
5%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
3 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
12
N
um
be
r o
f in
itia
tive
s fo
r
soci
al a
nd
eco
no
mic
dev
elo
pm
en
t ap
pro
ved
wit
hin
12
mo
nth
s
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r
New
Ind
icat
or
2
2
2
13
P
erce
nta
ge o
f D
isp
osa
l
Cer
tifi
cate
s o
f A
pp
rova
l
issu
ed w
ith
in 6
Mo
nth
s
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ue
st
3
0 %
8
0%
9
0 %
1
00
%
14
N
um
be
r o
f va
can
t fr
ee
ho
ld p
rop
ert
ies
app
rove
d
for
re d
evel
op
me
nt
by
BB
BEE
dev
elo
per
s
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r
New
Ind
icat
or
80
- 1
00
8
0 -
10
0
80
- 1
00
15
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d t
o
sup
po
rt O
per
atio
n P
hak
isa
(mar
i/aq
uac
ult
ure
pro
ject
s) w
ith
in 3
mo
nth
s
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ue
st**
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
60
-80
%
90
%
10
0%
16
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d o
n
pro
clai
med
fis
hin
g
har
bo
urs
infr
astr
uct
ure
wit
hin
9 m
on
ths
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ues
t **
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
60
-80
%
90
%
10
0%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
4 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
PR
OP
ERTY
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T (
RES
EAR
CH
)
17
R
epo
rt o
n t
he
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed b
uild
ings
agai
nst
th
e m
ean
fo
r th
e
year
in t
he
9 li
sted
per
form
ance
are
as
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
3 r
epo
rts
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs
4 r
epo
rts
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs
4 r
epo
rts
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs
18
N
um
be
r o
f fr
eeh
old
an
d
leas
eh
old
bu
ildin
gs
mea
sure
d a
gain
st in
du
stry
stan
dar
ds
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
Rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
Rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
Rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
*Cal
cula
ted
as
at t
he
13
th F
eb
ruar
y 2
01
5
**Ta
rget
su
bje
cted
to
bu
dge
t al
loca
tio
n
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
5 o
f 15
6
2.3
P
rogr
amm
e 2
: Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 8
: Pro
gram
me
2 Q
uar
terl
y ta
rget
s
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
2.3
.A
USE
R D
EMA
ND
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
Nu
mb
er
of
com
ple
ted
UA
MP
S A
nn
ual
ly
42
42
2
Nu
mb
er
of
Serv
ice
Leve
l Agr
eem
ents
dev
elo
pe
d in
lin
e w
ith
new
Ser
vice
Del
iver
y St
and
ard
s (S
DS)
An
nu
ally
5
1
5
1
3
Per
cen
tage
of
use
r d
epar
tme
nts
Fram
ewo
rk A
gre
emen
ts c
on
clu
ded
for
the
use
of
free
ho
ld p
rop
erti
es
Qu
arte
rly
80
-10
0%
8
0-1
00
%
80
-10
0%
8
0-1
00
%
80
-10
0%
2.3
.B
PLA
NN
ING
AN
D P
REC
INC
T D
EVE
LOP
MEN
T SE
RV
ICES
4
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct d
evel
op
men
t
pro
po
sals
pro
du
ced
fo
r H
ead
Off
ices
in T
shw
ane
An
nu
ally
2
2
5
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct d
evel
op
men
t p
rop
osa
ls p
rod
uce
d f
or
met
ros
and
d
istr
ict
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
An
nu
ally
2
2
6
Nu
mb
er
of
Pre
cin
ct d
evel
op
men
t
pro
po
sals
pro
du
ced
fo
r lo
cal/
rura
l
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
An
nu
ally
2
2
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
6 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
2.3
.C
INV
ESTM
ENT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
IN
VES
TMEN
T A
NA
LYSI
S
7
Per
cen
tage
incr
ease
in t
he
valu
e o
f
the
imm
ova
ble
ass
et p
ort
folio
An
nu
ally
2
%
2
%
8
Per
cen
tage
of
pre
limin
ary
inve
stm
ent
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d
wit
hin
3 m
on
ths
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ues
t
Qu
arte
rly
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
9
Per
cen
tage
of
inve
stm
en
t so
luti
on
s
for
con
stru
ctio
n a
pp
rove
d w
ith
in 2
4
mo
nth
s fr
om
dat
e o
f re
qu
est
Qu
arte
rly
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
10
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
solu
tio
ns
for
refu
rbis
hm
ents
ap
pro
ved
wit
hin
6
mo
nth
s fr
om
dat
e o
f re
qu
est
Qu
arte
rly
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
11
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
solu
tio
ns
for
leas
eho
ld a
nd
su
rplu
s fr
eeh
old
app
rove
d w
ith
in 1
mo
nth
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ues
t
Qu
arte
rly
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
75
%
12
N
um
be
r o
f in
itia
tive
s fo
r so
cial
an
d
eco
no
mic
dev
elo
pm
ent
app
rove
d
wit
hin
12
mo
nth
s
An
nu
ally
2
2
13
P
erce
nta
ge o
f D
isp
osa
l Cer
tifi
cate
s
of
Ap
pro
val i
ssu
ed w
ith
in 6
Mo
nth
s
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ue
st
Qu
arte
rly
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
7 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
14
N
um
be
r o
f va
can
t fr
ee h
old
pro
per
ties
ap
pro
ved
fo
r re
dev
elo
pm
en
t b
y B
BB
EE d
evel
op
ers
An
nu
al
80
- 1
00
80
- 1
00
15
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d t
o s
up
po
rt O
pe
rati
on
Ph
akis
a (m
ari/
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
roje
cts)
wit
hin
3 m
on
ths
fro
m d
ate
of
req
ues
t**
Qu
arte
rly
60
- 8
0%
6
0 -
80
%
60
- 8
0%
6
0 -
80
%
60
- 8
0%
16
P
erce
nta
ge o
f in
vest
me
nt
dec
isio
ns
app
rove
d o
n p
rocl
aim
ed
fis
hin
g
har
bo
urs
infr
astr
uct
ure
wit
hin
9
mo
nth
s fr
om
dat
e o
f re
qu
est
**
Qu
arte
rly
60
- 8
0%
6
0 -
80
%
60
- 8
0%
6
0 -
80
%
60
- 8
0%
P
RO
PER
TY P
ERFO
RM
AN
CE
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
( R
ESEA
RC
H)
17
R
epo
rt o
n t
he
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs a
gain
st t
he
mea
n
for
the
year
in t
he
9 li
ste
d
per
form
ance
are
as
Mo
nth
ly
3 r
epo
rts
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs
A
n a
pp
rove
d
rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
bu
ildin
gs o
f th
e
1st
Qu
arte
r
An
ap
pro
ved
rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
bu
ildin
gs o
f th
e
2n
d Q
uar
ter
An
ap
pro
ved
rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
bu
ildin
gs o
f th
e
3rd
Qu
arte
r
18
R
epo
rt o
n t
he
per
form
ance
fre
eh
old
and
leas
eho
ld b
uild
ings
mea
sure
d
agai
nst
ind
ust
ry s
tan
dar
ds
Qu
arte
rly
Rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
An
ap
pro
ved
rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
bu
ildin
gs
An
ap
pro
ved
rep
ort
on
th
e
per
form
ance
of
bu
ildin
gs
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
8 o
f 15
6
2.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 9
: Pro
gram
me
2 P
erfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Use
r D
em
and
Man
agem
ent
Pla
nn
ing
an
d P
reci
nct
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Serv
ices
Inve
stm
ent
Man
agem
ent
Tota
l -
- -
12
0 6
25
1
07
02
1
11
2 0
07
1
26
08
0
Tab
le 1
0: P
rogr
amm
e 1
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
12
0 6
25
1
07
02
1
11
2 0
07
1
26
08
0
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s
94
29
2
97
08
1
10
1 5
28
1
15
21
4
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
81
09
1
83
49
0
87
31
4
99
08
4
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
13
20
1
13
59
1
14
21
4
16
13
0
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
2
6 3
33
9
94
0
10
47
9
10
86
6
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 4
9 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Ad
vert
isin
g
1
63
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
2
40
Co
nsu
mab
le S
up
plie
s
4
07
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
1
31
0
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d
advi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Infr
astr
uct
ure
an
d p
lan
nin
g
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al c
ost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
en
t
3
76
Flee
t se
rvic
es (
incl
ud
ing
gove
rnm
ent
mo
tor
tran
spo
rt)
16
4
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
0 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
52
4
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
5 1
83
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
1
57
3
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Oth
er
2
6 3
33
10
47
9
10
86
6
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
1 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l
12
0 6
25
1
07
02
1
11
2 0
07
1
26
08
0
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
2 o
f 15
6
3.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 3
: C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N P
RO
JEC
T M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: T
o p
rovi
de
eff
ecti
ve a
nd
eff
icie
nt
del
iver
y o
f ac
com
mo
dat
ion
nee
ds
for
DP
W a
nd
Use
r D
epar
tmen
ts t
hro
ugh
co
nst
ruct
ion
an
d
oth
er in
fras
tru
ctu
re im
pro
vem
ent
pro
gram
mes
3
.1
Pro
gram
me
3: S
trat
egi
c o
bje
ctiv
e a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Ta
ble
11
: Pro
gram
me
3 S
trat
egi
c o
bje
ctiv
e an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
– 2
01
7/1
8
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
1
To e
nsu
re
del
ive
ry o
f n
ew
and
ref
urb
ish
ed
b
uild
ings
th
rou
gh
con
stru
ctio
n
pro
ject
m
anag
emen
t
3.1
.A
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
PLA
NN
ING
75
00
0 w
ork
o
pp
ort
un
itie
s
crea
ted
th
rou
gh
con
stru
ctio
n
pro
ject
s (E
PW
P)
48
07
7
04
6
53
09
1
48
2
15
00
0
15
00
0
15
00
0
3.2
.B
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
60
% o
f co
nst
ruct
ion
p
roje
cts
allo
cate
d
tow
ard
s B
BB
EE
con
trac
tors
3
0%
3
5%
4
0%
4
5%
50
co
nst
ruct
ion
p
roje
cts
del
iver
ed
in
com
plia
nce
wit
h t
he
IDM
S
0
5
1
0
15
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
3 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
3.2
.C
SPEC
IAL
PR
OJE
CTS
Bea
uti
fica
tio
n o
f 9
19
sch
oo
ls
nat
ion
wid
e*
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
77
4 s
cho
ols
nat
ion
wid
e b
eau
tifi
ed
14
4
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
4 o
f 15
6
3.2
P
rogr
amm
e 3
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 1
2: P
rogr
amm
e 3
Per
form
ance
ind
icat
ors
an
d a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 -
20
17
/18
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
3.2
.A
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
PLA
NN
ING
1.
Nu
mb
er
of
wo
rk o
pp
ort
un
itie
s
crea
ted
th
rou
gh c
on
stru
ctio
n
pro
ject
s (E
PW
P )
48
07
7
04
6
53
09
1
48
2
15
00
0
15
00
0
15
00
0
3.2
.B
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
2
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s co
mp
lete
d
wit
hin
agr
eed
co
nst
ruct
ion
p
erio
d
23
7
21
4
17
9
54
2
62
pro
ject
s o
f 1
03
2
7 p
roje
cts
of
41
1
0 p
roje
cts
of
14
3
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s co
mp
lete
d
wit
hin
ap
pro
ved
bu
dge
t 2
37
2
14
1
79
5
42
7
7 p
roje
cts
of
10
3
21
pro
ject
s o
f 2
6
4 p
roje
cts
of
5
4
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s in
th
e
curr
ent
WC
S p
roje
ct li
st c
lear
ed
23
7
21
4
17
9
54
2
27
1 p
roje
cts
of
54
2
10
8 p
roje
cts
of
27
1
16
pro
ject
s o
f 1
63
5
Per
cen
tage
of
con
stru
ctio
n
con
trac
ts a
lloca
ted
to
war
ds
BB
BEE
Ind
icat
or
pre
vio
usl
y
no
t m
easu
red
Ind
icat
or
pre
vio
usl
y
no
t m
easu
red
Ind
icat
or
pre
vio
usl
y n
ot
mea
sure
d
Ind
icat
or
pre
vio
usl
y n
ot
mea
sure
d
35
%
40
%
45
%
3.2
.C
SP
ECIA
L P
RO
JEC
TS
6
Nu
mb
er
of
sch
oo
ls c
om
ple
ted
wit
hin
pla
nn
ed c
on
stru
ctio
n
per
iod
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
77
4
14
4
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
5 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
7
Nu
mb
er
of
Wo
rk O
pp
ort
un
itie
s
Cre
ated
*
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
38
70
7
20
* 1
03
pro
ject
s re
po
rted
ab
ove
are
pro
ject
s in
co
nst
ruct
ion
wit
h a
def
init
ive
tim
efra
me
and
bu
dge
t.
** 6
48
bac
klo
g p
roje
cts
less
10
3 c
on
stru
ctio
n p
roje
cts
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
6 o
f 15
6
3.3
P
rogr
amm
e 3
: Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 1
3: P
rogr
amm
e 3
Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
for
201
5/16
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
n
3rd
4
th
3.3
.A
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
PLA
NN
ING
1
Nu
mb
er
of
wo
rk o
pp
ort
un
itie
s c
reat
ed
thro
ugh
co
nst
ruct
ion
pro
ject
s (E
PW
an
d
oth
er)
Qu
arte
rly
15
00
0
20
00
4
00
0
60
00
3
00
0
3.3
.B
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
PR
OJE
CT
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
2
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s co
mp
lete
d w
ith
in
agre
ed c
on
stru
ctio
n p
erio
d
Qu
arte
rly
62
1
6
16
1
4
16
3
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s co
mp
lete
d w
ith
in
app
rove
d b
ud
get
Qu
arte
rly
77
1
8
20
2
0
19
4
Nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s in
th
e cu
rren
t W
CS
pro
ject
list
cle
ared
Qu
arte
rly
27
1
54
8
1
10
8
28
5
Per
cen
tage
of
con
stru
ctio
n c
on
trac
ts
allo
cate
d t
ow
ard
s B
BB
EE
Qu
arte
rly
35
% (
23
of
65
)
con
stru
ctio
n c
on
trac
ts
allo
cate
d t
ow
ard
s
BB
BEE
7,5
% (
5 o
f 6
5)
14
% (
9 o
f 6
5)
10
.5%
(7
of
65)
3
% (
2 o
f 6
5)
3.3
.C
SPEC
IAL
PR
OJE
CTS
6
Nu
mb
er
of
sch
oo
ls c
om
ple
ted
wit
hin
pla
nn
ed c
on
stru
ctio
n p
eri
od
Qu
arte
rly
77
4
0
27
0
29
9
20
5
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
7 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
n
3rd
4
th
7
Nu
mb
er
of
Wo
rk O
pp
ort
un
itie
s C
reat
ed*
Q
uar
terl
y 3
87
0
0
13
50
1
49
5
10
25
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
8 o
f 15
6
3.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 1
4: P
rogr
amm
e 3
Per
form
ance
tar
gets
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Pre
-Co
nst
ruct
ion
Pro
ject
Pla
nn
ing
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Pro
ject
Man
age
men
t
Tota
l 3
01
8 4
43
2
37
1 2
55
5
5 0
12
5
27
83
1
46
5 9
62
4
85
69
3
52
3 8
64
Tab
le 1
5: P
rogr
amm
e 3
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
3
01
8 4
43
2
37
1 2
55
5
5 0
12
5
27
83
1
46
5 9
62
4
85
69
3
52
3 8
64
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s
36
9 9
35
3
82
87
8
39
9 2
28
4
33
25
9
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
31
8 1
44
3
29
27
5
34
3 3
36
3
72
60
3
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
51
79
1
53
60
3
55
89
2
60
65
6
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
3 0
17
95
7
2 4
04
42
6
1
22
31
3
46
17
0
48
42
9
51
39
2
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
9
23
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 5
9 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yee
s
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
1
85
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
3
23
2
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
1 8
47
Co
nsu
mab
le S
up
plie
s
1
38
5
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d
advi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Infr
astr
uct
ure
an
d
pla
nn
ing
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al c
ost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
3 0
17
95
7
2 4
04
42
6
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
57
7
Flee
t se
rvic
es (
incl
ud
ing
gove
rnm
ent
mo
tor
tran
spo
rt)
46
2
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
1 8
47
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
0 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
30
17
2
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
5
54
0
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Oth
er
1
22
31
3
4
8 4
29
5
1 3
92
Loss
es f
rom
4
86
(3
3 1
71
) 5
5 0
12
3
5 5
83
3
6 9
14
3
8 0
36
3
9 2
13
Ad
just
men
ts t
o f
air
valu
e o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
(4
8 1
06
) 2
9 9
56
1
5 5
83
1
6 9
14
1
8 0
36
1
9 2
13
Oth
er
1
4 9
35
2
5 0
56
2
0 0
00
2
0 0
00
2
0 0
00
2
0 0
00
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
1 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l 3
01
8 4
43
2
37
1 2
55
5
5 0
12
5
27
83
1
46
5 9
62
4
85
69
3
52
3 8
64
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
2 o
f 15
6
4.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 4
: R
EAL
ESTA
TE M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: T
o p
rovi
de
and
man
age
Rea
l Est
ate
Po
rtfo
lio in
su
pp
ort
of
Go
vern
men
t so
cial
, eco
no
mic
, fu
nct
ion
al a
nd
po
litic
al o
bje
ctiv
es.
4.1
P
rogr
amm
e 4
: Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
– 2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 1
6: P
rogr
amm
e 4
Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
ann
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
4.1
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
OF
FREE
HO
LD P
RO
PER
TY &
LA
ND
AD
MIN
ISTR
AT
ION
AN
D M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
1
To o
pti
mal
ly
uti
lize
fre
eho
ld
pro
per
ty f
or
Use
r D
epar
tme
nts
an
d G
ove
rnm
ent
Stra
tegi
c p
rio
riti
es
Occ
up
ancy
rat
e in
crea
sed
by
50
%
fo
r p
arti
ally
o
ccu
pie
d
pro
per
ty
N
o B
asel
ine
5
%
10
%
15
%
21
42
lan
d
par
cels
sec
ure
d
to le
t o
ut
for
eco
no
mic
d
evel
op
me
nt
init
iati
ves
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
10
0
20
0
30
0
4.1
.B
SU
RP
LUS
FREE
HO
LD (
REV
ENU
E) M
AN
AG
EMEN
T &
LEA
SEH
OLD
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
2.
To le
t o
ut
surp
lus
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ty f
or
reve
nu
e
30
00
su
rplu
s fr
eeh
old
p
rop
erti
es le
t
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
60
0
60
0
60
0
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
3 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
ou
t
3.
To m
anag
e an
d
pro
cure
le
ase
ho
ld
pro
per
ty f
or
use
r d
epar
tmen
t n
eed
s
R3
00
mill
ion
sa
ved
by
revi
sed
ren
t (c
arry
th
rou
gh
cost
)
Es
tim
ated
R 3
3
mill
ion
R
60
mill
ion
R
60
mill
ion
R
60
mill
ion
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
4 o
f 15
6
4.2
P
rogr
amm
e 4
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 1
7: P
rogr
amm
e 4
Per
form
ance
ind
icat
ors
an
d a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 -
20
17
/18
Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
r
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
4.2
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
OF
FREE
HO
LD P
RO
PER
TY &
LA
ND
AD
MIN
ISTR
AT
ION
AN
D M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
1
Per
cen
tage
occ
up
ancy
rat
e
incr
ease
d f
or
par
tial
ly o
ccu
pie
d
pro
per
ty
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
5%
1
0%
1
5%
2
Nu
mb
er
of
vaca
nt
lan
d (
Lan
d P
arce
ls)
let
ou
t to
war
ds
eco
no
mic
dev
elo
pm
en
t
init
iati
ves
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
10
0
20
0
30
0
4.2
.B
SUR
PLU
S FR
EEH
OLD
(R
EVEN
UE)
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
& L
EASE
HO
LD M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
3
Nu
mb
er
of
surp
lus
free
ho
ld o
ffic
e ty
pe
pro
per
ties
let
ou
t fo
r
reve
nu
e ge
ner
atio
n
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
10
0
10
0
10
0
4
Nu
mb
er
of
surp
lus
free
ho
ld r
esid
enti
al
pro
per
ties
let
ou
t fo
r
reve
nu
e ge
ner
atio
n
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
50
0
50
0
50
0
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
5 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
r
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
5
Nu
mb
er
of
leas
e
agre
eme
nts
revi
ewed
acc
ord
ing
to t
he
ren
tal r
ate
per
squ
are
met
re a
nd
esca
lati
on
s
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
50
0
10
00
1
50
0
6
Per
cen
tage
of
leas
es
ren
ewe
d b
efo
re
exp
iry
dat
e
2
5%
7
5%
8
0%
9
0%
7
Per
cen
tage
of
leas
ed
acco
mm
od
atio
n
(lea
se in
) p
rovi
ded
wit
hin
agr
eed
tim
e
per
iod
4
0%
5
0%
5
5%
6
0%
8
Per
cen
tage
of
surp
lus
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ty a
lloca
ted
tow
ard
s B
BB
EE
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
10
% o
f 3
00
0 1
2%
of
30
00
15
% o
f 3
00
0
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
6 o
f 15
6
4.3
P
rogr
amm
e 4
: Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 1
8: P
rogr
amm
e 4
Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
for
201
5/16
Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
r
(Lan
d M
anag
em
en
t &
A
dm
inis
trat
ion
)
Re
po
rtin
g p
eri
od
A
nn
ual
Tar
get
20
15
/16
Q
uar
terl
y Ta
rge
ts
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
4.3
.A
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
OF
FREE
HO
LD P
RO
PER
TY &
LA
ND
AD
MIN
ISTR
AT
ION
AN
D M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
1
Per
cen
tage
occ
up
ancy
rate
incr
ease
d f
or
par
tial
ly o
ccu
pie
d
pro
per
ty
An
nu
ally
5
%
5
%
2
Nu
mb
er
of
vaca
nt
lan
d
(Lan
d P
arce
ls)
secu
red
to
let
ou
t to
war
ds
eco
no
mic
dev
elo
pm
en
t in
itia
tive
s
Qu
arte
rly
10
0
2
5
25
5
0
4.3
.B
SU
RP
LUS
FREE
HO
LD (
REV
ENU
E) M
AN
AG
EMEN
T &
LEA
SEH
OLD
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
3
Nu
mb
er
of
su
rplu
s
free
ho
ld o
ffic
e ty
pe
pro
per
ties
let
for
reve
nu
e ge
ner
atio
n
Qu
arte
rly
10
0 s
urp
lus
free
ho
ld
off
ice
typ
e p
rop
erti
es le
t
ou
t
2
5
25
5
0
4
Nu
mb
er
of
surp
lus
free
ho
ld r
esid
enti
al
pro
per
ties
let
ou
t fo
r
reve
nu
e ge
ner
atio
n
Qu
arte
rly
50
0
1
66
1
67
1
67
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
7 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
r
(Lan
d M
anag
em
en
t &
A
dm
inis
trat
ion
)
Re
po
rtin
g p
eri
od
A
nn
ual
Tar
get
20
15
/16
Q
uar
terl
y Ta
rge
ts
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
5
Nu
mb
er
of
leas
e
agre
eme
nts
rev
iew
ed
acco
rdin
g to
th
e re
nta
l
rate
per
sq
uar
e m
etre
and
esc
alat
ion
s
Qu
arte
rly
50
0
10
0
22
5
32
5
50
0
6
Per
cen
tage
of
leas
es
ren
ewe
d b
efo
re e
xpir
y
dat
e
Qu
arte
rly
75
%
25
%
45
%
60
%
75
%
7
Per
cen
tage
of
leas
ed
acco
mm
od
atio
n (
leas
e
in)
pro
vid
ed
wit
hin
agre
ed t
ime
fram
e
Qu
arte
rly
50
%
42
%
45
%
48
%
50
%
8
Per
cen
tage
of
surp
lus
free
ho
ld p
rop
erty
allo
cate
d t
ow
ard
s B
BB
EE
Qu
arte
rly
10
% o
f 3
00
0 (
30
0)
25
% o
f 3
00
(7
5)
25
% o
f 3
00
(7
5)
25
% o
f 3
00
(7
5)
25
% o
f 3
00
(7
5)
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
8 o
f 15
6
4.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 1
9: P
rogr
amm
e 4
Per
form
ance
tar
gets
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Man
agem
ent
of
Fre
eho
ld P
rop
erty
fo
r St
ate
Dep
artm
ents
Man
agem
ent
of
leas
ed –
in p
rop
erti
es f
or
Stat
e D
epar
tmen
ts
Leas
ed O
ut
free
ho
ld P
rop
erti
es f
or
reve
nu
e
Lan
d M
anag
emen
t &
Ad
min
istr
atio
n
Tota
l 4
01
4 8
11
4
12
8 2
94
4
82
4 6
94
5
35
9 7
24
5
72
0 3
52
6
15
2 4
26
6
63
3 0
46
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 6
9 o
f 15
6
Tab
le 2
0: P
rogr
amm
e 4
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
3
31
8 5
34
3
63
3 9
70
4
14
2 2
57
4
39
9 5
62
4
66
4 1
74
4
99
0 6
30
5
35
5 0
70
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s
18
1 7
12
1
86
12
9
19
6 5
55
2
07
95
8
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
15
6 2
72
1
60
07
1
16
9 0
37
1
78
84
4
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
25
44
0
26
05
8
27
51
8
29
11
4
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
3 3
04
21
9
3 3
31
00
7
3 5
08
03
9
3 8
80
82
0
4 1
12
30
4
4 4
03
86
5
4 7
31
21
8
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
8
15
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
1
94
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
1
06
7
Co
nsu
mab
le S
up
plie
s
5
28
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
1 5
26
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d
advi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
In
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
pla
nn
ing
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al c
ost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
20
7
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
0 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Flee
t se
rvic
es (
incl
ud
ing
gove
rnm
ent
mo
tor
tran
spo
rt)
11
9
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
2 9
69
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
3 3
04
21
9
3 3
30
96
6
3 5
08
02
7
3 8
23
96
8
4 0
86
73
6
4 3
81
31
4
4 7
07
54
8
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
6 9
55
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
7
07
5
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Oth
er
4
1
12
5
6 8
52
1
3
22
55
1
23
67
0
Loss
es f
rom
29
0 7
42
6
21
51
8
32
3 3
14
3
50
92
8
37
4 2
12
3
98
61
6
Ad
just
men
ts t
o f
air
valu
e o
f fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
2
90
74
2
62
1 5
18
3
23
31
4
35
0 9
28
3
74
21
2
39
8 6
16
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
14
31
5
12
22
1
12
70
0
13
71
6
14
81
3
15
99
8
17
27
8
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
3
44
7
Ren
t o
n la
nd
1
0 8
68
1
2 2
21
1
2 7
00
1
3 7
16
1
4 8
13
1
5 9
98
1
7 2
78
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
1 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s 6
96
27
7
49
4 3
24
6
82
43
7
96
0 1
62
1
05
6 1
78
1
16
1 7
96
1
27
7 9
76
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s 6
96
27
7
49
4 3
24
6
82
43
7
96
0 1
62
1
05
6 1
78
1
16
1 7
96
1
27
7 9
76
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l 4
01
4 8
11
4
12
8 2
94
4
82
4 6
94
5
35
9 7
24
5
72
0 3
52
6
15
2 4
26
6
63
3 0
46
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
2 o
f 15
6
5.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 5
: R
EAL
ESTA
TE IN
FOR
MA
TIO
N &
REG
ISTR
Y
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: T
o d
evel
op
an
d m
anag
e a
com
ple
te,
accu
rate
an
d c
om
plia
nt
Imm
ova
ble
Ass
et R
egis
ter
to m
eet
serv
ice
del
iver
y o
bje
ctiv
es f
or
the
Stat
e, D
epar
tmen
t an
d P
rop
erty
Man
agem
ent
Trad
ing
Enti
ty b
usi
nes
s re
qu
irem
ents
.
5.1
P
rogr
amm
e 5
: Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
– 2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 2
1: P
rogr
amm
e 5
Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
ann
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
5.1
.A
ASS
ET R
EGIS
TRY
SER
VIC
ES &
CO
NV
EYA
NC
ING
1
To
co
mp
ile a
nd
mai
nta
in a
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r u
nd
er
the
cust
od
ian
ship
of
Pu
blic
Wo
rks
Co
mp
lete
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
No
t ap
plic
able
**
No
t
app
licab
le**
95
% o
f
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s
veri
fied
98
% id
enti
fied
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
10
0%
id
enti
fied
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r
mai
nta
ine
d
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r m
ain
tain
ed
2
Cre
ate
a si
ngl
e
rep
osi
tory
fo
r al
l
sph
ere
s o
f
Go
vern
men
t*
6 P
rovi
nci
al a
nd
3 M
etro
po
litan
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
rs
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
***
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
1 P
rovi
nci
al a
nd
1
Met
rop
olit
an R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
rs
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
3 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
A
ud
it o
f al
l sta
te
coas
tal r
eser
ves
un
der
th
e
cust
od
ian
ship
of
Pu
blic
Wo
rks
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
Sta
te c
oas
tal
rese
rve
s (
GIS
)
map
ped
30
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal r
eser
ves
surv
eye
d
35
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal
rese
rve
s su
rvey
ed
30
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal
rese
rve
s re
gist
ered
*Th
e Im
mo
vab
le A
sset
Reg
iste
r is
no
t a
sta
tic
do
cum
ent,
mu
st b
e co
nti
nu
ou
sly
reco
nci
led
an
d u
pd
ate
d. T
he
nu
mb
ers
are
th
us
sub
ject
to
ch
an
ge
du
e to
on
-go
ing
rec
on
cilia
tio
ns
an
d
inve
stig
ati
on
s b
etw
een
Na
tio
na
l an
d P
rovi
nci
al c
ust
od
ian
s **
Each
cu
sto
dia
n o
f R
eal E
sta
te A
sset
s in
th
e 3
sp
her
es o
f g
ove
rnm
ent
rem
ain
s re
spo
nsi
ble
fo
r th
e in
teg
rity
of
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et R
egis
ter
(REA
L ES
TATE
ASS
ET R
EGIS
TRY)
da
ta u
nd
er it
s co
ntr
ol
** T
he
ph
ysic
al v
erif
ica
tio
n e
xerc
ise
com
men
ced
in t
he
20
13
/14
fin
an
cia
l yea
r **
* 6
Pro
vin
ces
(Lim
po
po
, No
rth
Wes
t, F
ree
Sta
te, M
pu
ma
lan
ga
, Kw
a-Z
ulu
Na
tal;
No
rth
ern
Ca
pe)
& 3
Met
ros
(Tsh
wa
ne,
Eku
rhu
len
i; So
l Pla
atj
ie)
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
4 o
f 15
6
5.2
P
rogr
amm
e 5
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 2
2: P
rogr
amm
e 5
Per
form
ance
ind
icat
ors
an
d a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 -
20
17
/18
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
5.2
.A
ASS
ET R
EGIS
TRY
SER
VIC
ES &
CO
NV
EYA
NC
ING
1
Per
cen
tage
of
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
.*
95
% o
f id
enti
fie
d
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
98
% id
enti
fied
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s ve
rifi
ed
10
0%
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r
mai
nta
ine
d
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r
mai
nta
ine
d
2
Per
cen
tage
of
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s (a
nn
ual
ly
iden
tifi
ed
aft
er
Dec
emb
er)
veri
fied
*
New
Ind
icat
or
N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r N
ew In
dic
ato
r 1
00
% o
f R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
ets
an
nu
ally
iden
tifi
ed
aft
er
Dec
emb
er
10
0%
of
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s
ann
ual
ly
iden
tifi
ed
aft
er
Dec
emb
er
10
0%
of
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s
ann
ual
ly
iden
tifi
ed
aft
er
Dec
emb
er
3
Nu
mb
er
of
Pro
vin
cial
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r in
corp
ora
ted
into
th
e si
ngl
e
rep
osi
tory
*
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
1
Pro
vin
cial
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
4
Nu
mb
er
of
Met
rop
olit
an
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s R
eal E
stat
e
Reg
iste
r in
corp
ora
ted
into
th
e si
ngl
e re
po
sito
ry
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
1 M
etro
po
litan
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Rea
l Est
ate
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
5 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r A
ud
ite
d/
Act
ual
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
Esti
mat
ed
P
erf
orm
ance
2
01
4/1
5
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
5
Per
cen
tage
of
Co
nve
yan
cin
g w
ith
in 1
80
day
s
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
80
%
85
%
90
%
6
Au
dit
of
all s
tate
co
asta
l
rese
rve
s u
nd
er t
he
cust
od
ian
ship
of
Pu
blic
Wo
rks*
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
Stat
e co
asta
l
rese
rve
s (
GIS
)
map
ped
30
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal r
eser
ves
surv
eye
d
35
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal r
eser
ves
surv
eye
d
30
% o
f st
ate
coas
tal r
eser
ves
regi
ster
ed
*Tar
get
sub
ject
ed
to
bu
dge
t al
loca
tio
n
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
6 o
f 15
6
5.3
P
rogr
amm
e 5
Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 2
3: P
rogr
amm
e 5
Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
for
201
5/16
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
5.3
.A
ASS
ET R
EGIS
TRY
SER
VIC
ES &
CO
NV
EYA
NC
ING
1
Per
cen
tage
of
iden
tifi
ed R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d.
Qu
arte
rly
10
0%
of
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l
Esta
te A
sset
s ve
rifi
ed
98
% o
f id
enti
fie
d
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
98
.5%
of
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
99
% o
f id
enti
fied
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
10
0%
of
iden
tifi
ed
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
veri
fied
2
Per
cen
tage
of
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
(an
nu
ally
ide
nti
fie
d a
fter
Dec
emb
er)
veri
fied
*
Qu
arte
rly
10
0%
of
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d
6%
of
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d
30
% o
f R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d
36
% o
f R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d
28
% o
f R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
ets
ver
ifie
d
3
Nu
mb
er
of
Pro
vin
cial
Rea
l Est
ate
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r in
corp
ora
ted
into
th
e
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
Qu
arte
rly
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal E
stat
e
Ass
et
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to t
he
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
Ap
pro
ved
Dat
a
Mig
rati
on
pla
n
Co
mp
lete
bi –
ann
ual
reco
nci
liati
on
of
Pro
vin
cial
dat
a
agai
nst
PM
TE
Co
mp
lete
bi-
ann
ual
reco
nci
liati
on
of
Pro
vin
cial
dat
a
agai
nst
Dee
ds
reco
rds
1 P
rovi
nci
al R
eal
Esta
te A
sset
Reg
iste
r
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to
the
sin
gle
rep
osi
tory
4
Per
cen
tage
of
Co
nve
yan
cin
g w
ith
in
18
0 d
ays
Qu
arte
rly
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
60
%
5
Per
cen
tage
of
coas
tal r
eser
ve
(GIS
)un
der
th
e cu
sto
dia
nsh
ip o
f
Pu
blic
Wo
rks
map
pe
d
An
nu
ally
1
00
% o
f co
asta
l res
erve
un
der
th
e
cust
od
ian
ship
of
Pu
blic
Wo
rks
map
ped
25
%
25
%
25
%
25
%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
7 o
f 15
6
5.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 2
4: P
rogr
amm
e 5
Per
form
ance
tar
gets
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Ass
et R
egi
ster
Man
age
men
t
Co
nve
yan
cin
g an
d V
est
ing
Tota
l 4
12
45
4
- 1
83
7
73
8 6
48
1
66
2 4
69
1
66
4 7
49
1
67
0 3
25
Tab
le 2
5: P
rogr
amm
e 5
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
4
12
45
4
1
83
7
73
8 6
48
1
66
2 4
69
1
66
4 7
49
1
67
0 3
25
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s
12
82
0
13
19
9
13
92
4
14
62
0
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
11
02
5
11
35
1
11
97
5
12
57
3
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
1 7
95
1
84
8
1 9
49
2
04
7
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
5
82
8
29
27
0
30
82
5
35
70
5
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
2
2
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
8 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
6
6
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
3
52
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
Co
nsu
mab
le S
up
plie
s
1
54
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d
advi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
In
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
pla
nn
ing
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al c
ost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
97
Flee
t se
rvic
es (
incl
ud
ing
gove
rnm
ent
mo
tor
tran
spo
rt)
11
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
17
6
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 7
9 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
92
6
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
3
96
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Imm
ova
ble
Ass
et R
egis
ter
27
07
0
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Oth
er
5
82
8
3
0 8
25
3
5 7
05
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
Loss
es f
rom
Imp
airm
ents
to
no
n-f
inan
cial
ass
ets
41
2 4
54
Dep
reci
atio
n
1 8
37
7
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
1 6
20
00
0
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
0 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l 4
12
45
4
- 1
83
7
73
8 6
48
1
66
2 4
69
1
66
4 7
49
1
67
0 3
25
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
1 o
f 15
6
6.
PR
OG
RA
MM
E 6
: FA
CIL
ITIE
S M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
Pu
rpo
se o
f th
e p
rogr
amm
e: T
o e
nsu
re t
hat
imm
ove
able
ass
ets
use
d b
y go
vern
me
nt
dep
artm
ents
an
d t
he
pu
blic
, are
op
tim
ally
uti
lised
an
d m
ain
tain
ed in
a
safe
, sec
ure
hea
lth
y an
d e
rgo
no
mic
en
viro
nm
ent
wh
ile c
on
trib
uti
ng
to jo
b c
reat
ion
, ski
lls d
evel
op
men
t an
d p
ove
rty
alle
viat
ion
.
6.1
P
rogr
amm
e 6
: Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
– 2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 2
6: P
rogr
amm
e 6
Str
ate
gic
ob
ject
ive
ann
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 –
20
17
/18
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
6.1
.A
SC
HED
ULE
D M
AIN
TEN
AN
CE
& S
AFE
TY, H
EALT
H, E
NV
IRO
NM
ENT,
RIS
K A
ND
QU
ALI
TY (
SHER
Q)
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
To e
nsu
re t
he
sch
edu
led
m
ain
ten
ance
of
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ty
15
00
0 id
enti
fie
d
bu
ildin
gs w
ith
Fa
cilit
ies
Man
agem
en
t co
ntr
acts
in
pla
ce
85
fix
ed t
erm
co
ntr
acts
in
pla
ce
14
7 f
ixed
ter
m
con
trac
ts in
pla
ce
12
9 f
ixed
ter
m
con
trac
ts in
pla
ce
24
5
30
0
30
0
30
0
11
Bu
ildin
g M
anag
eme
nt
Syst
ems
inst
alle
d
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r
New
ind
icat
or
1
2
3
3
2
To e
nsu
re e
ner
gy
and
wat
er
effi
cien
cy in
fr
eeh
old
p
rop
erty
1,6
28
,50
0,0
00
ki
low
att-
ho
ur
(Kw
h)
red
uct
ion
in
usa
ge
ach
ieve
d o
n
ener
gy
con
sum
pti
on
*
12
2, 7
68
, 29
8.4
1
72
, 52
9, 8
11
.4
18
8, 8
33
, 98
0.4
1
90
,00
0,0
00
2
20
,00
0,0
00
2
50
,00
0,0
00
3
50
,00
0,0
00
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
2 o
f 15
6
Stra
tegi
c O
bje
ctiv
e
Stra
tegi
c P
lan
Ta
rge
t (5
ye
ar
targ
et)
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
23
,84
3,6
34
ki
lolit
re -
(kl)
re
du
ctio
n in
u
sage
ach
ieve
d
on
wat
er
con
sum
pti
on
*
2,1
13
,16
4
51
7,4
63
1
,32
8,6
27
3
,55
0,4
80
3
,90
5,5
28
4
,29
6,0
80
4
,72
5,6
88
6.1
.B
UN
SCH
EDU
LED
MA
INTE
NA
NC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
3
To r
epai
r ke
y
com
po
nen
ts a
nd
un
der
take
un
sch
edu
led
mai
nte
nan
ce f
or
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ty
95
% e
ffic
ien
cy
(tu
rnar
ou
nd
tim
e) f
or
un
sch
edu
led
mai
nte
nan
ce o
n
free
ho
ld
pro
per
ty w
ith
in
5 d
ays
50
%
55
%
56
%
60
%
65
%
75
%
85
%
25
00
0 w
ork
o
pp
ort
un
itie
s cr
eate
d t
hro
ugh
m
ain
ten
ance
p
rogr
amm
es
(DP
W’s
EP
WP
Ta
rget
s)
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
50
00
5
00
0
50
00
*Tar
get
sub
ject
ed
to
bu
dge
t al
loca
tio
n
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
3 o
f 15
6
6.2
P
rogr
amm
e 6
: Pe
rfo
rman
ce in
dic
ato
rs a
nd
an
nu
al t
arge
ts f
or
20
15
/16
-2
01
7/1
8
Tab
le 2
7: P
rogr
amm
e 6
Per
form
ance
ind
icat
ors
an
d a
nn
ual
tar
gets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6 -
20
17
/18
Pe
rfo
rman
ce I
nd
icat
or
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
6.2
.A
SC
HED
ULE
D M
AIN
TEN
AN
CE
& S
HER
Q M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
1
Nu
mb
er
of
iden
tifi
ed
bu
ildin
gs w
ith
Fac
iliti
es
Man
agem
en
t C
on
trac
ts
2
45
3
00
3
00
3
00
2
Red
uct
ion
in k
ilow
att-
ho
ur
(Kw
h)
usa
ge
ach
ieve
d o
n e
ner
gy
con
sum
pti
on
*
12
2, 7
68
, 29
8.4
1
72
, 52
9, 8
11
.4
18
8, 8
33
, 98
0.4
1
90
,00
0,0
00
2
20
,00
0,0
00
2
50
,00
0,0
00
3
50
,00
0,0
00
3
Red
uct
ion
in k
ilolit
re -
(kl)
u
sage
ach
ieve
d o
n
wat
er c
on
sum
pti
on
*
2,1
13
,16
4
51
7,4
63
1
,32
8,6
27
3
,55
0,4
80
3
,90
5,5
28
4
,29
6,0
80
4
,72
5,6
88
6.2
.B
UN
SCH
EDU
LED
MA
INTE
NA
NC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
4
Per
cen
tage
eff
icie
ncy
(t
urn
aro
un
d t
ime)
fo
r u
nsc
hed
ule
d
mai
nte
nan
ce o
n
free
ho
ld p
rop
erty
wit
hin
5
day
s
6
0%
6
5%
7
5%
8
5%
5
Nu
mb
er
of
wo
rk
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
crea
ted
th
rou
gh m
ain
ten
ance
p
rogr
amm
es (
DP
W’s
EP
WP
Tar
gets
)
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
New
Ind
icat
or
50
00
5
00
0
50
00
6
Nu
mb
er
of
Bu
ildin
g M
anag
eme
nt
Syst
ems
inst
alle
d
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r N
ew in
dic
ato
r 3
3
3
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
4 o
f 15
6
Pe
rfo
rman
ce I
nd
icat
or
Au
dit
ed
/ A
ctu
al P
erf
orm
ance
Es
tim
ate
d
Pe
rfo
rman
ce
20
14
/15
Me
diu
m-T
erm
Tar
gets
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
5/1
6
20
16
/17
2
01
7/1
8
7
Per
cen
tage
of
Faci
litie
s M
anag
eme
nt
con
trac
ts
allo
cate
d t
ow
ard
s B
BB
EE
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
New
ind
icat
or
N
ew in
dic
ato
r 6
5%
6
5%
6
5%
*Tar
get
sub
ject
ed
to
bu
dge
t al
loca
tio
n
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
5 o
f 15
6
6.3
P
rogr
amm
e 6
: Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
fo
r 2
01
5/1
6
Tab
le 2
8: P
rogr
amm
e 6
Qu
arte
rly
targ
ets
for
201
5/16
Pe
rfo
rman
ce In
dic
ato
r R
ep
ort
ing
pe
rio
d
An
nu
al T
arge
t 2
01
5/1
6
Qu
arte
rly
Targ
ets
1st
2
nd
3rd
4
th
6.2
.A
SCH
EDU
LED
MA
INTE
NA
NC
E &
SH
ERQ
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
1
Nu
mb
er
of
iden
tifi
ed b
uild
ings
wit
h
Faci
litie
s M
anag
emen
t C
on
trac
ts
Qu
arte
rly
30
0 id
enti
fie
d b
uild
ings
w
ith
Fac
iliti
es
Man
agem
en
t C
on
trac
ts
50
7
5
10
0
75
2
Red
uct
ion
in k
ilow
att-
ho
ur
(Kw
h)
usa
ge a
chie
ved
on
en
ergy
co
nsu
mp
tio
n
Qu
arte
rly
22
0,0
00
,00
0.0
0
55
,00
0,0
00
5
5,0
00
,00
0
55
,00
0,0
00
5
5,0
00
,00
0
3
Red
uct
ion
in k
ilolit
re -
(kl)
usa
ge
ach
ieve
d o
n w
ater
co
nsu
mp
tio
n
Qu
arte
rly
3,9
05
,52
8
97
6,3
82
9
76
,38
2
97
6,3
82
97
6,3
82
6.3
.B
UN
SCH
EDU
LED
MA
INTE
NA
NC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
4
Per
cen
tage
eff
icie
ncy
(tu
rnar
ou
nd
ti
me)
fo
r u
nsc
he
du
led
mai
nte
nan
ce
on
fre
eho
ld p
rop
erty
wit
hin
5 d
ays
6
5%
6
5%
6
5%
6
5%
6
5%
5
Nu
mb
er
of
wo
rk o
pp
ort
un
itie
s cr
eate
d t
hro
ugh
mai
nte
nan
ce
pro
gram
mes
(D
PW
’s E
PW
P T
arge
ts)
Qu
arte
rly
50
00
wo
rk
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
crea
ted
1
25
0
12
50
1
25
0
12
50
6
Nu
mb
er
of
Bu
ildin
g M
anag
eme
nt
Syst
ems
inst
alle
d
Qu
arte
rly
3
1
1
1
7
Per
cen
tage
of
Faci
litie
s M
anag
eme
nt
con
trac
ts a
lloca
ted
to
war
ds
BB
BEE
Qu
arte
rly
65
%
65
%
65
%
65
%
65
%
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
6 o
f 15
6
6.4
R
eco
nci
ling
pe
rfo
rman
ce t
arge
ts w
ith
th
e B
ud
get
and
MTE
F Ex
pen
dit
ure
est
ima
tes
Tab
le 2
9: P
rogr
amm
e 6
Per
form
ance
tar
gets
Pro
gram
me
s A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e
Ad
just
ed
ap
pro
pri
atio
n
Me
diu
m-t
erm
exp
en
dit
ure
est
imat
e
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Pla
nn
ed M
ain
ten
ance
Un
sch
edu
led
Mai
nte
nan
ce
SHER
Q M
anag
emen
t
Tota
l 3
34
4 1
17
3
28
7 1
63
2
53
1 2
41
2
98
4 9
98
2
80
3 6
56
2
81
2 9
80
2
91
9 2
91
Tab
le 3
0: P
rogr
amm
e 6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e A
dju
ste
d
app
rop
riat
ion
M
ed
ium
-te
rm e
xpe
nd
itu
re e
stim
ate
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Cu
rre
nt
pay
me
nts
3
34
4 1
17
3
28
7 1
63
2
53
1 2
41
2
98
4 9
98
2
80
3 6
56
2
81
2 9
80
2
91
9 2
91
Co
mp
ensa
tio
n o
f em
plo
yee
s
27
0 5
09
2
75
89
1
29
1 3
46
3
08
27
7
Sala
rie
s an
d w
ages
23
2 6
38
2
37
26
6
25
0 5
58
2
65
11
8
Soci
al c
on
trib
uti
on
s
37
87
1
38
62
5
40
78
8
43
15
9
Go
od
s an
d s
ervi
ces
3 3
43
57
6
3 2
87
16
3
2 5
31
24
1
2 7
14
48
9
2 5
27
76
5
2 5
21
63
4
2 6
11
01
4
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e fe
es
Ad
vert
isin
g
5
9
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
7 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e A
dju
ste
d
app
rop
riat
ion
M
ed
ium
-te
rm e
xpe
nd
itu
re e
stim
ate
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Ass
ets
less
th
an t
he
cap
ital
isat
ion
th
resh
old
Au
dit
co
st: E
xter
nal
Bu
rsar
ies:
Em
plo
yees
Cat
erin
g: D
epar
tmen
tal a
ctiv
itie
s
1
4
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
(G
&S)
7
7
Co
mp
ute
r se
rvic
es
11
0
Co
nsu
mab
le S
up
plie
s
3
8
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Bu
sin
ess
an
d
advi
sory
ser
vice
s
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
In
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
pla
nn
ing
Co
nsu
ltan
ts a
nd
pro
fess
ion
al s
ervi
ces:
Leg
al c
ost
s
Co
ntr
acto
rs
Age
ncy
an
d s
up
po
rt /
ou
tso
urc
ed s
ervi
ces
Ente
rtai
nm
ent
15
Flee
t se
rvic
es (
incl
ud
ing
gove
rnm
ent
mo
tor
tran
spo
rt)
9
Inve
nto
ry: F
oo
d a
nd
fo
od
su
pp
lies
Inve
nto
ry: F
uel
, oil
and
gas
Inve
nto
ry: L
earn
er a
nd
tea
che
r su
pp
ort
mat
eria
l
Inve
nto
ry: M
ater
ials
an
d s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: M
edic
al s
up
plie
s
Inve
nto
ry: O
ther
co
nsu
mab
les
Inve
nto
ry: S
tati
on
ery
and
pri
nti
ng
21
4
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
8 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e A
dju
ste
d
app
rop
riat
ion
M
ed
ium
-te
rm e
xpe
nd
itu
re e
stim
ate
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Op
erat
ing
leas
es
Pro
per
ty p
aym
ents
Trav
el a
nd
su
bsi
sten
ce
50
1
Trai
nin
g an
d d
evel
op
men
t
Op
erat
ing
pay
men
ts
Ren
tal a
nd
Hir
ing
Oth
er M
ach
iner
y &
Eq
uip
men
t
4
64
Ven
ues
an
d f
acili
tie
s
Rep
airs
& m
ain
ten
ance
3
13
3 2
69
3
11
9 3
00
2
33
8 6
84
2
45
2 0
40
2
25
2 7
98
2
23
1 5
45
2
30
5 5
55
Oth
er
21
0 3
07
1
67
86
3
19
2 5
57
2
62
44
9
2
90
08
9
30
5 4
59
Inte
rest
an
d r
ent
on
lan
d
Inte
rest
(In
cl. i
nte
rest
on
fin
ance
leas
es)
5
41
Tran
sfe
rs a
nd
su
bsi
die
s
Pro
vin
ces
and
mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
itie
s
Mu
nic
ipal
age
nci
es
and
fu
nd
s
Ho
use
ho
lds
Soci
al b
enef
its
Oth
er t
ran
sfer
s to
ho
use
ho
lds
Pay
me
nts
fo
r ca
pit
al a
sse
ts
Mac
hin
ery
and
eq
uip
men
t
Tran
spo
rt e
qu
ipm
ent
PM
TE –
AN
NU
AL
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E P
LAN
Pag
e 8
9 o
f 15
6
Eco
no
mic
cla
ssif
icat
ion
A
ud
ite
d o
utc
om
e A
dju
ste
d
app
rop
riat
ion
M
ed
ium
-te
rm e
xpe
nd
itu
re e
stim
ate
20
11
/12
2
01
2/1
3
20
13
/14
2
01
4/1
5
20
15
/16
2
01
6/1
7
20
17
/18
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
) (R
’00
0)
(R’0
00
)
Oth
er m
ach
iner
y an
d e
qu
ipm
ent
Soft
war
e an
d o
ther
inta
ngi
ble
ass
ets
Pay
me
nts
fo
r fi
nan
cial
ass
ets
Tota
l 3
34
4 1
17
3
28
7 1
63
2
53
1 2
41
2
98
4 9
98
2
80
3 6
56
2
81
2 9
80
2
91
9 2
91
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 90 of 156
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 91 of 156
Page 91 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
PART C: LINKS TO OTHER PLANS (PLEASE REFER TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN)
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 92 of 156
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 93 of 156
Page 93 of 156
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TRADING ENTITY
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2015/2016
PART D: ANNEXURES TO THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 94 of 156
Annexure A: Technical indicator descriptions
1. PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION
1.1.A MANAGEMENT
Indicator 1.1
Indicator title Annual Performance Plan approved within the legislated time frame
Short definition The development, submission and approval of the PMTE Annual Performance Plan to the Minister of Public Works in line with the legislated timeframe
Purpose/importance The Annual Performance Plan is an accountability document setting out the PMTE’s plans for the upcoming financial year and during the ENE to implement its Strategic Plan. The PMTE’s performance is monitored and reported against the core set of indicators as set out in the Annual Performance Plan.
Source/collection of
data
Government priorities and outcomes (MTSF and NDP), Estimates of National Expenditure (ENE), Annual Report, Programme Operational Plans that measure important aspects of the service that is being delivered.
Method of calculation Collection of information, Collating and Analysis of the external
environment that seeks to achieve the mandate of the PMTE
Data limitations N/A
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative – for the year
Reporting cycle Annually
New indicator No
Desired performance Annual Performance Plan for approval by the Minister and tabled in
Parliament within the legislated timeframe
Indicator
responsibility
Head of PMTE
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 95 of 156
Indicator 1.2
Indicator title Approved quarterly performance reports
Short definition The Quarterly Performance Reports detail the performance of the PMTE
against the targets set in the Annual Performance Plan. These must be
approved as per the relevant statutory prescripts.
Purpose/importance To determine the level or degree of PMTE’s performance (Actual vs.
Targets) on a quarterly basis and provide corrective measures in areas of
underperformance.
Source/collection of
data
PMTE’s Branch or Divisional quarterly performance monitoring reports and
reviews
Method of calculation Each target as set in the APP is matched against the actual performance for
that Quarter to determine the degree of performance
Data limitations Inadequate and incomplete data and POEs from units
Type of indicator Output – (Physical Report)
Calculation type Non-Cumulative – for the year
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance Approved quarterly performance reports with complete, valid and accurate
performance information
Indicator
responsibility
Head of PMTE
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 96 of 156
Indicator 1.3
Indicator title Approved Annual Performance Report
Short definition The PMTE’s performance is audited against the core set of indicators as set
out in the Annual Performance Plan and reported on annually
Purpose/importance The Annual Performance Report is an accountability document reporting
on the PMTE’s actual audited performance against the five year Strategic
and Annual Performance Plan.
Source/collection of
data
Government priorities and outcomes (MTSF and NDP), Estimates of
National Expenditure (ENE), Annual Report, Programme Operational Plans
that measure important aspects of the service that is being delivered.
Method of calculation Approved annual performance reports
Data limitations N/A
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually
New indicator No
Desired performance Annual Performance Plan for approval by the Minister and tabled in
Parliament
Indicator
responsibility
Head of PMTE
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 97 of 156
1.1.B OPERATIONS SUPPORT MANAGEMENT
Indicator 1.4
Indicator title Percentage of time the network is available for business use
Short definition Network connectivity to the internet, intranet and business
applications such as email and transversal systems
Purpose/importance To support business functions through availability of network for ease
of work
Source/collection of data DPW/PMTE Local Area Network and the State Information Technology
Agency’s Wide Area Network
Method of calculation Actual time of the available of network at a particular point expressed
as a percentage
Data limitations No specific limitations
Type of indicator Output / Service
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 99% availability
Indicator responsibility Director: ICT
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 98 of 156
Indicator 1.5
Indicator title Percentage of ICT infrastructure available for business use
Short definition Server infrastructure to operate the applications production
environment; test environment and the backup of such servers
Purpose/importance To support business functions through availability of ICT server
infrastructure
Source/collection of data DPW/PMTE monitoring system(s)
Method of calculation Percentage of availability
Data limitations None
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 99% availability
Indicator responsibility Director: ICT
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 99 of 156
Indicator 1.6
Indicator title Percentage of ICT SLA commitments achieved (Business
Applications)
Short definition Service Level Agreement in terms of availing relevant business
systems
Purpose/importance To support business functions through availability of relevant
business systems
Source/collection of data Number of business systems available to for the relevant number
of business functions
Method of calculation Percentage of availability of business systems for relevant business
functions
Data limitations None
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 99% of business functions supported through a relevant business
systems
Indicator responsibility Director: ICT
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 100 of 156
Indicator 1.7
Indicator title Percentage of legal opinions contracts formulated within 5 working days
of request
Short definition Provision of legal opinion contracts in the shortest possible time
Purpose/importance Development of legally sound contracts
Source/collection of
data
Number of contracts
Method of calculation Number of contracts developed within 5 working days over a total number
of contracts
Data limitations None
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 80% of contracts developed within 5 working days of receipt
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 101 of 156
Indicator 1.8
Indicator title Percentage reduction in vacancy rate
Short definition Measures the organization’s vacancy rates resulting from employee
turnover. This formula can be used to calculate the vacancy rate for one
position, a class code, a division or the entire organization
Purpose/importance To maintain the vacancy rate of 10% or less, as stipulated by DPSA, as a
total number of vacancies is achieved through the annual filling-in of
vacancies to at least 25% annually. This will ensure that the entity is
capacitated with the requisite skills to deliver on its mandate
Source/collection of
data
All business units of PMTE
Method of calculation Total number of Vacant positions as of today ÷ Total number of positions as of today x 100. This will be compared periodically to determine changes (reduction or increase) in vacancy rates
Data limitations Budget constraints to fill all critical and specialised vacancies in the entity/
Inadequate and incomplete turnover information
Type of indicator Output indicator/Statistical indicator
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance To maintain the vacancy rate of 10% or less/Critical and specialised
vacancies advertised and filled within the stipulated timeframes
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 102 of 156
Indicator 1.9
Indicator title Percentage of Staff developed on specialised skills
Short definition Measures the staff development in identified specialised skills
Purpose/importance To improve efficiency in the functioning and delivery of services/capacitate
the entity with skills required by various units to deliver on its mandate
Source/collection of
data
All business units of PMTE
Method of calculation Number of staff developed in particular set of skill expressed as a
percentage of total staff identified for training/Percentage of staff trained
on specialised skills
Data limitations N/A
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non - Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance Capacitate PMTE with specialised skills
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 103 of 156
1.1.C FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT
Indicator 1.10
Indicator title Percentage of invoices recovered within 30 days of receipt
Short definition The indicator is measuring the percentage of compliant invoices received
from service providers for services rendered which are required to be paid
within 30 days in accordance with the Treasury Regulations 8.3.1.
Purpose/importance Tracks the turnaround time of payments to ensure compliance with
regulatory prescripts and to ensure that service providers are not
disadvantaged with regard to late payment
Source/collection of
data BAS report indicating when the invoice was received and when it was paid.
Method of calculation The number of compliant invoices that are paid within 30 days
The total number of compliant invoices received
Data limitations Late and non-submission of invoices to registry.
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 100 % compliance to 30 day payment regulations
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Finance
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 104 of 156
Indicator 1.11
Indicator title Percentage reduction in the debtors balance (1.8billion as at 1st April
2014)
Short definition To reduce the long outstanding balance by performing reconciliations,
obtaining supporting documents and engage user departments to settle all
validated/reconciled claims.
Purpose/importance To improve recovery of outstanding balance To improve recovery of
outstanding balance
Source/collection of
data
Obtain download from the systems, obtain source documents, perform
reconciliations, engage regions and user departments
Method of calculation Quarterly Report
Data limitations Quality information (download from the PMIS, relevant supporting
documents)
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 20% reduction of the opening balance for 2015/16
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: Revenue & Debt Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 105 of 156
Indicator 1.12
Indicator title Percentage recovery in the debtors current year balance
Short definition To improve the recovery in the debtors current year balance by issuing
invoices, reconciliations, obtaining supporting documents and engage user
departments to settle all validated/reconciled claims.
Purpose/importance To improve recovery of current year outstanding balance
Source/collection of
data
Obtain download from the systems, obtain source documents, perform
reconciliations, engage regions and user departments
Method of calculation Quarterly Report
Data limitations Quality information (download from the PMIS, relevant supporting
documents)
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 90% recovery of the current year balance (2015/16)
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: Revenue & Debt Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 106 of 156
Indicator 1.13
Indicator title Estimate of National Expenditure (ENE) supporting documents ( database
and narrative ) submitted within regulated timeframes to National
Treasury
Short definition Annual ENE documents developed and submitted to National Treasury for
publication.
Purpose/importance To provide detail on the estimated expenditure (and Revenue) of the PMTE
in terms of Budget Programmes
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on engagements with stakeholders.
Method of calculation None
Data limitations Inputs not received timeously from stakeholders
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type None
Reporting cycle Annually in terms of Treasury guidelines
New indicator No
Desired performance ENE Published by National Treasury
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: Financial Planning
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 107 of 156
1.1. D SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
Indicator 1.14
Indicator title Percentage of bids awarded within 56 working days of tender closure
Short definition % compliant and relevant bids awarded within validity period
Purpose/importance To demonstrate that the end to end business process for processing bids is
able to be executed within the prescribed validity period thereby
enhancing service delivery to clients and ensuring compliance to
regulations.
Source/collection of
data
Statistics related to all bids awarded by the respective approval authorities
will be collected from the SCM tender section that is responsible to collate
and manage this information.
Method of calculation Total number of bids awarded within the 56 days validity is subtracted
from the total number of bids awarded in the reporting quarter. Number is
then converted to a percentage.
Data limitations Dependent on the decisions taken by the BAC.
Type of indicator Indicator is measuring activities related to an output (tender awarded).
Calculation type The reported performance is cumulative.
Reporting cycle The indicator is reported quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance To award all bids within the prescribed 56 day validity to prevent extending
tender validity periods beyond this period. SCM will strive to achieve for
actual performance that exceeds the targeted performance as this will
indeed contribute to service delivery improvements and position SCM as a
credible business unit within the department.
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: SCM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 108 of 156
Indicator 1.15
Indicator title 110.% (market related price + 10% preferential premium) achieved in
purchasing goods, services or works
Short definition Achieving market related prices in purchasing of goods
Purpose/importance To measure the cost of a tender to establish whether the department is
paying prevailing market related costs and not paying for a tender wherein
the price is inflated and includes excessive profit margins.
Source/collection of
data
The tender section will provide the tender price of every tender that is
awarded by the relevant approval authorities.
Method of calculation Market related price + 11.11% preferential premium
Data limitations Dependent on the decisions taken by the BAC to award the tenders.
Type of indicator Indicator is measuring activities related to an output (tender awarded).
Calculation type The reported performance is cumulative.
Reporting cycle The indicator is reported quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance The department will scrutinise all tenders received and compare the
tendered price to the estimate and the variance between all bidder’s
tendered prices. The department will also evaluate the prices of past
tenders awarded for a similar scope of work to establish a benchmark
price. The intent is to pay a price that is market related but inclusive of the
premium of 10% as provided for in the BBBEE preference system. This will
possibly include a process of negotiation with tenderers to get best value
for the State.
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: SCM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 109 of 156
Indicator 1.16
Indicator title Average variation on all contracts executed
Short definition Variations executed on contracts to be in line with allowable National
Treasury rates
Purpose/importance To ensure that the department manages its contracts in such a way that
they are concluded in accordance with the tendered price. In instances
where variations are necessary, then contracts must be varied only within
the allowable Treasury limitations.
Source/collection of
data
The VOC will provide statistics on all variations approved that fall within
and outside the allowable National Treasury rates.
Method of calculation Take the total number of contracts that had variations approved and then
calculate the percentage of variation for each contract. The total number
of all contracts with variations approved that are within the allowable
range are then divided by the total number of all contracts that were
varied. Number is then converted to a percentage.
Data limitations Dependent on the approvals granted by the VOC.
Type of indicator Indicator is measuring activities related to an output (tender awarded).
Calculation type The reported performance is cumulative.
Reporting cycle The indicator is reported quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Not to have any variation to contracts but this is only achievable if the
specifications and scope of work are clearly defined in the beginning. SCM
would thus be dependent on bid specification committees articulating their
requirements as precisely as possible.
Indicator
responsibility
Director: SCM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 110 of 156
2. PROGRAMME 2: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES
2.1.A USER DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Indicator 2.1
Indicator title Number of completed User Asset Management Plans (UAMP’s) for user
departments
Short definition To compile User Asset Management Plans (UAMP’s) in compliance to
GIAMA
Purpose/importance To compile UAMP as a measure of compliance with the GIAMA in forward planning and budgeting for infrastructure and non-infrastructure requirements
Source/collection of
data
Strategic Plan, Annual Performance Plan, ENE, Annual Reports, WCS, PMIS, Immovable Asset Register and Feasibility Studies
Method of calculation None
Data limitations Adequacy of information received from user departments and entities
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Indicator is reported quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance The desired performance should be the same as the targeted performance to ensure compliance to GIAMA
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: KAM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 111 of 156
Indicator 2.2
Indicator title Number of Service Level Agreements developed in line with new Service
Delivery Standards (SDS)
Percentage of Service Level Agreements managed in line with new
Service Delivery Standards (SDS)
Short definition To compile and sign Service Level Agreements between DPW and user
departments and entities in relation to provision of accommodation
services
Purpose/importance To govern the relationship between DPW and user departments and
entities with regard to the provision of infrastructure and non-
infrastructure requirements throughout the asset life cycle
Source/collection of
data
Generic DPW Service Level Agreement, Client’s Strategic Plan and ENE,
Client UAMP, Asset Register, WCS and PMIS data, Service Delivery
Standards, approved day-to-day maintenance policy
Method of calculation None
Data limitations Adequacy of information on DPW immovable and movable Asset Registers,
outdated Service Delivery Standards
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Indicator is reported quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance A higher performance in the signing and reviewing of Service Level
Agreement will lead to improved delivery on the infrastructure
requirements of user departments and entities through a well-governed
relationship
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: KAM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 112 of 156
Indicator 2.3
Indicator title Percentage of user departments Framework Agreements concluded for
the use of freehold properties
Short definition Framework agreement between custodian and user department for the
use of freehold properties
Purpose/importance Regulate the utilisation of the freehold properties to ensure accountability
by user departments
Source/collection of
data
PMIS, Asset Register and Maintenance guideline
Method of calculation None.
Data limitations Data integrity on PMIS and Asset Register
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type None.
Reporting cycle Indicator is reported quarterly
New indicator No.
Desired performance The desired performance should be the same as the targeted performance to ensure compliance to GIAMA
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: KAM
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 113 of 156
2.1.B PLANNING AND PRECINCT (SPATIAL) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Indicator 2.4
Indicator title Number of Precinct development proposals produced for Head Offices in
Tshwane
Short definition Number of accommodation development opportunities identified for
accommodation solutions at Macro/ISDF level to advance urban spatial
patterns in meeting community needs through the Integration of the
Government estate with sound local planning frameworks.
Purpose/importance Various National Government Departments have confirmed their urgent need
for additional and/or more appropriate head office and supplementary
facilities. State property development will also contribute towards the
reduction in leased accommodation.
Source/collection of
data
An integrated GIS database will store and illustrate research and status quo
statistics from all contributing urban/rural planning initiatives and entities.
Method of calculation Integrated development frameworks, site development plans, UAMP’s,
project business plans, and building concepts will determine the nature,
amount, and location of office bulk to be created within each precinct.
Data limitations The delivery of land for development is subject to client acceptance, legal
compliance with local authority development guidelines and regulations,
environmental compliance, and stakeholder engagement, all with its own
complexities.
Type of indicator Development performance will be measured against activities successfully
completed in achieving the desired outcome.
Calculation type The number of development solutions
Reporting cycle The indicator will be reported on an annual basis.
New indicator No
Desired performance Accommodation solution for DHET, accommodation proposals for NT, DAFF
and H G De Witt Site.
Indicator responsibility DDG: Inner City Regeneration
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 114 of 156
Indicator 2.5
Indicator title Number of Precinct development proposals produced for metros and district municipalities
Short definition Precinct development proposals identified for accommodation solutions at Macro/SDF level to advance urban spatial patterns in meeting community needs through the Integration of the Government estate with sound local planning frameworks. Likewise to develop the infrastructure, operational efficiency and range of supply and support services.
Precinct Development Proposals: constitutes the client’s needs assessment, spatial planning aligned to IDPs & SDFs, location opportunities including site due diligence.
Purpose/importance The Precinct Development Proposal will guide the location, development and rehabilitation of government buildings within the precinct context, thereby ensuring easy access to government services, promoting a “one stop concept”, whilst ensuring improved working conditions for state departments.
Creation of government precincts and integrating infrastructure development in urban and rural areas will aid in improved government efficiencies. It would further contribute to permanent state owned accommodation for government departments.
Source/collection of data
An integrated GIS database will store and illustrate research and status quo statistics from all contributing urban/rural planning initiatives and entities.
Method of calculation Integrated development frameworks, site development plans, UAMP’s, project business plans, and building concepts will determine the nature, amount, and location of office bulk to be created within each precinct.
Data limitations The delivery of land for development is subject to client acceptance, legal compliance with local authority development guidelines and regulations, environmental compliance, and stakeholder engagement, all with its own complexities.
Type of indicator Development performance will be measured against activities successfully completed in achieving the desired outcome.
Calculation type The number of precinct development proposals and accommodation solutions
Reporting cycle The indicator will be reported on an annual basis.
New indicator No
Desired performance Precinct development proposals for Mmabatho and Mbombela,
Indicator responsibility
DDG: Inner City Regeneration
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 115 of 156
Indicator 2.6
Indicator title Number of Precinct development proposals produced for local/rural municipalities
Short definition Precinct development proposals identified for accommodation solutions at Macro/SDF level to advance urban spatial patterns in meeting community needs through the Integration of the Government estate with sound local planning frameworks. Likewise to develop the infrastructure, operational efficiency and range of supply and support services.
Precinct Development Proposals: constitutes the client’s needs assessment, spatial planning aligned to IDPs & SDFs, location opportunities including site due diligence.
Purpose/importance The Precinct Development Proposal will guide the location, development and rehabilitation of government buildings within the precinct context, thereby ensuring easy access to government services, promoting a “one stop concept”, whilst ensuring improved working conditions for state departments.
Creation of government precincts and integrating infrastructure development in rural areas that will aid in improved government efficiencies. It would further contribute to permanent state owned accommodation for government departments.
Source/collection of data
An integrated GIS database will store and illustrate research and status quo statistics from all contributing urban/rural planning initiatives and entities.
Method of calculation Integrated development frameworks, site development plans, UAMP’s, project business plans, and building concepts will determine the nature, amount, and location of office bulk to be created within each precinct.
Data limitations The delivery of land for development is subject to client acceptance, legal compliance with local authority development guidelines and regulations, environmental compliance, and stakeholder engagement, all with its own complexities.
Type of indicator Development performance will be measured against activities successfully completed in achieving the desired outcome.
Calculation type The number of precinct development proposals and accommodation solutions
Reporting cycle The indicator will be reported on an annual basis.
New indicator No
Desired performance Precinct development proposals for Mount Fletcher and Mandeni.
Indicator responsibility
DDG: Inner City Regeneration
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 116 of 156
2.1.C PROPERTY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Indicator 2.7
Indicator title Percentage increase in the value of the immovable asset portfolio
Short definition The measure of growth in the value of the Real Estate Assets under PMTE
custodianship
Purpose/importance To show creation of wealth and return on investment
Source/collection of
data
Real Estate Asset Register/Infrastructure implementation plans/ WCS,
valuation reports/feasibility studies
Method of calculation Current value of asset portfolio minus the base value over the base value
expressed as a percentage. The change is determined periodically
compared to the initial portfolio
Data limitations WCS not update, incomplete Asset Register and absence of an integrated
Asset Management system
Type of indicator Outcome indicator/Equity
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 2% per annum
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 117 of 156
Indicator 2.8
Indicator title Percentage of preliminary investment decisions approved within 3 months
from date of request
Short definition Preliminary investigative reports indicating preferred infrastructure solutions. It is not yet a final investment decision.
Purpose/importance To recommend the preferred options for investment decisions to provide accommodation solutions to meet user departments service delivery objectives
Source/collection of
data
U-AMP’s, C-AMP/ Real Estate Asset Register/, Market Research/ applicable legislation/policy frameworks
Method of calculation Completed investigative reports indicating preferred infrastructure solutions counted on a quarterly basis and expressed as a percentage. The percentage is determined based on the receipt of requests.
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs’/ incomplete Asset Register/ absence of an integrated Asset Management system/ absence of condition assessments
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 75% of annual requests received
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 118 of 156
Indicator 2.9
Indicator title Percentage of investment solutions for construction approved within 24
months from date of request
Short definition Provision of a decision for construction which may include projects already in the programme for implementation.
Purpose/importance To decide on the preferred investment solution (construction) to reduce the leased-in portfolio
Source/collection of
data
U-AMP’s,/C-AMP/ Real Estate Asset Register/ Market Research/ applicable legislation /policy frameworks
Method of calculation Completed reports will be counted on a quarterly basis expressed as a percentage.
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs/, incomplete Asset Register/ absence of an integrated Asset Management system/, absence of condition assessments
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Implementation of targeted investment decisions will result in improved performance of state owned Real Estate Assets. However, higher levels of performance relating to investment decisions are desirable given the current magnitude and condition of the portfolio
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 119 of 156
Indicator 2.10
Indicator title Percentage of investment solutions for refurbishments approved within 6
months from date of request
Short definition Provision of a decision for refurbishment which may include projects already in the programme for implementation.
Purpose/importance To decide on the preferred investment solution (refurbishment) to improve the performance of the State Immovable Asset. This may include maximum utilisation, extended building life etc
Source/collection of
data
U-AMP’s,/C-AMP/Real Estate Asset Register/Market Research/ applicable legislation/ policy frameworks
Method of calculation Completed reports will be counted on a quarterly basis expressed as a percentage..
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs’/ incomplete Asset Register/ absence of an integrated Asset Management system/ absence of condition assessments,
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Implementation of targeted investment decisions will result in improved performance of state owned Real Estate Assets. However, higher levels of performance relating to investment decisions are desirable given the current magnitude and condition of the portfolio
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 120 of 156
Indicator 2.11
Indicator title Percentage of investment solutions for leasehold and surplus freehold
approved within 1 month from date of request
Short definition Detailed reports indicating preferred investment options on the letting out of
unutilised Real Estate Assets for revenue generating purposes
Purpose/importance To make a decision as to generate revenue and ensure optimum utilisation of
surplus freehold.
Source/collection of
data
U-AMP’s/, C-AMP/ Real Estate Asset Register/ Market Research/ applicable
legislation and policy frameworks
Method of calculation Completed reports will be counted on a quarterly basis expressed as a
percentage.
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs/’, incomplete Asset Register/, absence of an
integrated Asset Management system/, absence of condition assessments
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Implementation of targeted investment decisions will result in improved
performance of state owned Real Estate Assets. However, higher levels of
performance relating to investment decisions are desirable given the current
magnitude and condition of the portfolio
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 121 of 156
Indicator 2.12
Indicator title Number of initiatives for social and economic development approved
within 12 months
Short definition Release of state owned land for Socio Economic purposes
Purpose/importance Contributing in addressing Socio Economic objectives of Government
Source/collection of
data
Real Estate Asset Register
Method of calculation Requests received and initiatives identified
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs’/ incomplete Asset Register
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 2 Annually
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 122 of 156
Indicator 2.13
Indicator title Percentage of Disposal Certificates of Approval issued within 6 Months
from date of request
Short definition Release of state owned land for Socio Economic purposes
Purpose/importance Contributing in addressing Socio Economic objectives of Government
Source/collection of
data
Immovable Asset Register
Method of calculation Requests received and initiatives identified
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs’, incomplete Asset Register
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 80% annually
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: ASSET INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 123 of 156
Indicator 2.14
Indicator title Number of vacant free hold properties approved for re development by
BBBEE developers
Short definition Availing 100 free hold properties earmarked for BBBEE
Purpose/importance Support BBBEE property developers
Source/collection of
data
U-AMP’s/ C-AMP/ Real Estate Asset Register/, Market Research/, applicable legislation/policy frameworks
Method of calculation Number identified properties for BBBEE developments
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs/, incomplete Asset Register/, absence of an integrated Asset Management system
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non -Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 100 number of properties
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 124 of 156
Indicator 2.15
Indicator title Percentage of approved investment decisions to support the Operation
Phakisa (mari/aquaculture projects) within 3 months from date of request
Short definition Investment decision reports received and investment initiatives on the
coastal land
Purpose/importance To support the ocean economy
Source/collection of
data
Immovable Asset Register/ SEDF document
Method of calculation Number of investment decision reports expressed as a percentage
Data limitations Lack of an integrated Immovable Asset Management system/ data integrity
Type of indicator Output (Report)
Calculation type Non- Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 60-80% of requests received and investment initiatives
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 125 of 156
Indicator 2.16
Indicator title Percentage of approved investment decisions on proclaimed fishing harbour
infrastructure within 9 months from date of request
Short definition Investment decision reports received on proclaimed fishing harbours
Purpose/importance To support the ocean economy and to ensure that infrastructure meets
service delivery objectives of Government
Source/collection of
data
Immovable Asset Register/ SEDF document
Method of calculation Number of investment decision reports as expressed as a percentage
Data limitations Lack of an integrated Immovable Asset Management system, data integrity
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 60-80% of requests received and investment initiatives
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 126 of 156
PROPERTY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT (RESEARCH)
Indicator 2.17
Indicator title
Report on the performance of identified buildings against the mean for the
year in the 9 listed performance areas
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to savings on operating cost
Purpose/importance To realise savings in operating costs
Source/collection of
data
Real Estate Asset Register/ Infrastructure implementation plans/ WCS/ valuation reports
Method of calculation No specific calculation
Data limitations Lack of Immovable Asset Management system/ data integrity
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Complete reports with information to support decision making
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 127 of 156
Indicator 2.18
Indicator title Report on the performance of freehold and leasehold buildings measured
against industry standards
Short definition Comparing state owned property performance against private sector standards
Purpose/importance To bring efficiency and efficacy in the management of state owned properties
Source/collection of
data
Real Estate Asset Register/ Market Research/ applicable legislation/ policy frameworks/performance reports
Method of calculation No specific calculation.
Data limitations Non-submission of U-AMPs/’, incomplete Asset Register/, absence of an integrated Asset Management system/, absence of condition assessments/ and data integrity
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Complete reports with information to support decision making
Indicator
responsibility
DDG: Asset Investment Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 128 of 156
3. PROGRAMME 3: CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT
3.1.A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PLANNING
Indicator 3.1
Indicator title Number of work opportunities created through construction projects
(EPWP )
Short definition Job opportunities created through construction
Purpose/importance To measure the downstream job creation benefits for the infrastructure
projects
Source/collection of
data
The data from construction projects
Method of calculation Numbers
Data limitations Non submission of employment data from all construction sites
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually for 5 years - the indicator is long term aligned to the MTEF
New indicator No
Desired performance Poverty alleviation
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 129 of 156
3.1.B CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Indicator 3.2
Indicator title Number of projects completed within agreed construction period
Short definition Rate of completion of projects
Purpose/importance To measure efficiency on delivery of infrastructure projects
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on the number of signed completion
certificates.
Method of calculation Number
Data limitations Non submission of signed completion certificate
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually for 5 years - the indicator is long term aligned to the MTEF
New indicator No
Desired performance Complete all projects within contract period
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 130 of 156
Indicator 3.3
Indicator title Percentage of projects completed within approved budget
Short definition Cost effectiveness in delivery of infrastructure projects
Purpose/importance To measure the economics of delivery of projects
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on expenditure reports.
Method of calculation Numbers
Data limitations System financial information not updated
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually for 5 years - the indicator is long term aligned to the MTEF
New indicator No
Desired performance Projects completed within budget
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 131 of 156
Indicator 3.4
Indicator title Number of projects in the current WCS project list cleared
Short definition Completion of building program
Purpose/importance To measure the delivery of completed projects as programmed to users
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on completion of projects in the building
program.
Method of calculation Number
Data limitations Design and construction not properly monitored
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually for 5 years - the indicator is long term aligned to the MTEF
New indicator No
Desired performance All registered projects in building program are successfully completed
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 132 of 156
Indicator 3.5
Indicator title Number of construction contracts allocated towards BBBEE
Short definition Projects executed by BBBEE firms
Purpose/importance To achieve inclusive economic participation
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on register of contracts awarded
Method of calculation Number
Data limitations Award register not created and updated
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually for 5 years - the indicator is long term aligned to the MTEF
New indicator No
Desired performance For every 100 contracts awarded, 35 goes to BBBEE
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 133 of 156
3.1.C SPECIAL PROJECTS
Indicator 3.6
Indicator title Number of schools completed within planned construction period
Short definition A total of 919 schools will be beautified with the use of contractors
appointed per cluster.
Purpose/importance To ensure that the construction works are done within time, cost and
specification.
Source/collection of
data
A completion certificate will be issued to the contractor at the end of
construction and all snags have been addressed.
Method of calculation Bill of quantities will detail the description and quantity of works to be
done per school
Data limitation Poor workmanship by the contactor
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance All 919 schools constructed
Indicator responsibility Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 134 of 156
Indicator 3.7
Indicator title Number of Work Opportunities Created*
Short definition Providing opportunities for the unemployed to contribute to the
economy.
Purpose/importance To create Work Opportunities Created*opportunities for people within
the communities where the schools are being beautified
Source/collection of
data
The social facilitators will collect date based on the community profiling
Method of calculation The labour desk recodes will indicate the actual number of jobs created
within the project
Data limitation Poor reporting on work opportunities created by the labour desk
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 5 job opportunities will be created per school.
Indicator responsibility Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 135 of 156
4. PROGRAMME 4: REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
4.1.A Management of Freehold Property & Land Administration and Management
Indicator 4.1
Indicator title Percentage occupancy rate increased for partially occupied property
Short definition The measure of growth in the utilization of partially occupied properties
Purpose/importance Increment in occupancy rate in partially occupied properties to its full potential for financial growth
Source/collection of
data
Immovable Asset Register and Property Management Information Systems
Method of calculation Current value of occupied asset portfolio
Data limitation Property Management Information Systems not updated, absence of integrated management system to track property performance, incomplete Asset Register
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Occupancy rate increase over 5 year plan
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 136 of 156
Indicator 4.2
Indicator title Number of vacant land (Land Parcels) let out towards economic
development initiatives
Short definition Development of vacant land parcels by private & public entities towards social-economic development initiatives
Purpose/importance Social-economic development of vacant land for revenue generation
Source/collection of data
Immovable Asset Register and Property Management Information Systems
Method of calculation Current number of vacant land parcels within the asset portfolio
Data limitation Property Management Information Systems not updated, absence of integrated management system to track property performance, incomplete Asset Register
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Occupancy rate increase over 5 year plan
Indicator responsibility
DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 137 of 156
4.1.B Surplus Freehold (Revenue) Management & Leasehold Management
Indicator 4.3
Indicator title Number of surplus freehold office type properties let out for revenue
generation
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to increasing revenue of office surplus properties
Purpose/importance To release office surplus properties for revenue generation
Source/collection of data
Policies & Procedures, Immovable Asset Register, Property Management Information Systems CAMPs, WCS and valuation reports
Method of calculation - Identification of areas where there is space for revenue generation
Data limitation Lack of Immovable Asset Management system, and data integrity
Type of indicator Economy
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 500 surplus freehold (office type) let out/Vacant Land
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 138 of 156
Indicator 4.4
Indicator title Number of surplus freehold residential properties let out for revenue
generation
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to increasing revenue of residential surplus properties
Purpose/importance To release residential surplus properties for revenue generation
Source/collection of data
Policies & Procedures, Immovable Asset Register, Property Management Information Systems CAMPs, WCS and valuation reports
Method of calculation Identification of areas where there is space for revenue generation
Data limitation Lack of Immovable Asset Management system, and data integrity
Type of indicator Economy
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 2500 surplus (residential) let out
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 139 of 156
Indicator 4.5
Indicator title Number of lease agreements reviewed according to the rental rate per square metre and escalations
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to lease agreements concluded and rental amounts saved
Purpose/importance To provide suitable accommodation for user departments
Source/collection of data
Policies & Procedures, indexes, benchmarking/ rental comparatives , Property Management Information Systems, Immovable Asset Register and CAMPs
Method of calculation Completed reports counted on a quarterly basis.
Data limitation Data integrity on Property Management Information Systems, non-submission of U-Amps’ and absence of an integrated Asset Management system
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance R300 million saved on rental revision 100% of expired leases procurement on time 80% contracts concluded on time
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 140 of 156
Indicator 4.6
Indicator title Percentage of leases renewed before expiry date
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to lease agreements concluded and renewal of lease agreements before the expiry date
Purpose/importance Renewal of current leases within the requisite time frame
Source/collection of data
Policies & Procedures, indexes, benchmarking/ rental comparatives , Property Management Information Systems, Immovable Asset Register and CAMPs
Method of calculation Quarterly
Data limitation Data integrity on Property Management Information Systems, non-submission of U-Amps’ and absence of an integrated Asset Management system
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle DDG: REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
New indicator Yes
Desired performance R300 million saved on rental revision 100% of expired leases procurement on time 80% contracts concluded on time
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 141 of 156
Indicator 4.7
Indicator title Percentage of leased accommodation (leased in) provided within
agreed time period
Short definition Measuring performance of the portfolio in relation to leased
accommodation provided
Purpose/importance Provision of leased accommodation within the stipulated time frame to
the lessee
Source/collection of data
Policies & Procedures, indexes, benchmarking/ rental comparatives
, Property Management Information Systems, Immovable Asset
Register and CAMPs
Method of calculation Quarterly
Data limitation Data integrity on Property Management Information Systems, non-
submission of U-Amps’ and absence of an integrated Asset
Management system
Type of indicator Output
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle DDG: REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
New indicator Yes
Desired performance 70% by 2019
Indicator responsibility DDG: Regional Coordination
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 142 of 156
Indicator 4.8
Indicator title Percentage of surplus freehold property allocated towards BBBEE
Short definition Surplus freehold property percentage allocated towards BBBEE compliant
property developers
Purpose/importance To achieve inclusive economic participation
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is based on register of contracts awarded
Method of calculation Number
Data limitations Award register not created and updated
Type of indicator Output indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Annually
New indicator No
Desired performance 10% towards BBBEE
Indicator
responsibility
Director
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 143 of 156
5. PROGRAMME 5: REAL ESTATE INFORMATION & REGISTRY SERVICES
5.1.A ASSET REGISTRY SERVICES & CONVEYANCING
Indicator 5.1
Indicator title Percentage of identified Real Estate Assets verified
Short definition Complete Immovable Asset Register (IAR) with on-going maintenance,
verified through the integrated business processes of the PMTE to ensure
information on immovable assets is compliant, accurate and reliable.
Purpose/importance Verified identified Immovable Assets in support of asset investment, property and construction management functions of the PMTE.
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data to enhance the Immovable Asset Register is various immovable asset data sources such as the Deeds Web, Deeds data (Pub land data), Surveyor-General, Municipalities and Custodians’ IARs (National and Provincial spheres of Government) and other business units in the PMTE.
Method of calculation Percentage of verified Immovable Assets
Data limitations Incomplete data; inaccurate property descriptions; and the dependency on various stakeholders for the provision of data
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 144 of 156
Indicator 5.2
Indicator title Percentage of Real Estate Assets (annually identified after December)
verified
Short definition Complete Immovable Asset Register (IAR) with on-going maintenance for
additional immovable assets identified after December on an annual basis,
verified through the integrated business processes of the PMTE to ensure
information on immovable assets is compliant, accurate and reliable.
Purpose/importance Verified Immovable Assets identified annually after December in support of asset investment, property and construction management functions of the PMTE.
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data to enhance the Immovable Asset Register is various immovable asset data sources such as the Deeds Web, Deeds data (Pub land data), Surveyor-General, Municipalities and Custodians’ IARs (National and Provincial spheres of Government) and other business units in the PMTE.
Method of calculation Percentage of number of Immovable Assets (identified after December annually) verified
Data limitations Incomplete data; inaccurate property descriptions and the dependency on various stakeholders for the provision of data
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Non-cumulative.
Reporting cycle Quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 145 of 156
Indicator 5.3
Indicator title Number of Provincial Real Estate Asset Register incorporated into the single
repository*
Short definition Incorporated Provincial Custodians IARs into the single repository
Purpose/importance All State-owned immovable assets in the three spheres of Government
incorporated into a single repository
Source/collection of
data The data comes from various Provincial Custodians’ Immovable Asset
Registers as reconciled against the Deeds data and other Custodians IARs
Method of calculation Total number of Provincial Custodians IARs incorporated into the single repository
Data limitations IARs data integrity, incomplete/inaccurate property descriptions and different sources (electronic systems) and definitions that could have been used by Custodians
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Non-cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 146 of 156
Indicator 5.4
Indicator title Number of Metropolitan Municipalities Real Estate Asset Registry’s
incorporated into the single repository
Short definition Incorporated Provincial Custodians IARs into the single repository
Purpose/importance All State-owned immovable assets in the three spheres of Government incorporated into a single repository
Source/collection of
data
To incorporate Metropolitan Municipalities IARs into the single repository. The data comes from various immovable assets data sources like Metropolitan Municipalities IARs
Method of calculation Total number of Metropolitan Municipalities IARs incorporated into the single repository
Data limitations IARs data integrity, incomplete/inaccurate property descriptions, different sources (electronic systems), definitions that could have been used by Custodians and different regulatory environments
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Non-cumulative.
Reporting cycle Quarterly.
New indicator Yes
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 147 of 156
Indicator 5.5
Indicator title Percentage of Conveyancing within 180 days
Short definition Complete Immovable Asset Register (IAR) with on-going maintenance,
verified through the integrated business processes of the PMTE to ensure
information on immovable assets is compliant, accurate and reliable.
Purpose/importance Verified identified Immovable Assets in support of asset investment, property and construction management functions of the PMTE.
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data to enhance the Immovable Asset Register is various immovable asset data sources such as the Deeds Web, Deeds data (Pub land data), Surveyor-General, Municipalities and Custodians’ IARs (National and Provincial spheres of Government) and other business units in the PMTE.
Method of calculation Percentage of verified Immovable Assets
Data limitations Incomplete data; inaccurate property descriptions; and the dependency on various stakeholders for the provision of data
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 148 of 156
Indicator 5.6
Indicator title Audit of all state coastal reserves under the custodianship of Public Works
Short definition Complete audit verified through the integrated business processes of the
PMTE to ensure information on all coastal reserves are compliant and
accurate.
Purpose/importance Verified identified coastal assets in support of asset investment, property and construction management functions of the PMTE.
Source/collection of
data
The source of the data is various coastal asset data sources such as the Deeds Web, Deeds data (Pub land data), Surveyor-General, Custodians’ IARs (National and Provincial spheres of Government) and other business units in the PMTE.
Method of calculation Audit of verified coastal assets
Data limitations Incomplete data; inaccurate property descriptions; and the dependency on various stakeholders for the provision of data
Type of indicator Output Indicator
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance The actual performance that is higher than the targeted performance
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Asset Register Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 149 of 156
6. PROGRAMME 6: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
6.1.A SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE & SHERQ MANAGEMENT
Indicator 6.1
Indicator title Number of identified buildings with Facilities Management Contracts
Short definition Contracts signed off by the Facilities Practitioner for identified buildings
Purpose/importance Facilities Management services to identified buildings
Source/collection of
data
Needs assessment reports for each identified building
Method of calculation Counting of buildings
Data limitations Inadequate and/or incomplete needs assessment reports
Type of indicator Output- FM contract
Calculation type Output- Number Buildings counted
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance 245 buildings with Facilities Management services
Indicator
responsibility
Chief Director: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 150 of 156
Indicator 6.2
Indicator title Reduction in kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage achieved on energy consumption
Short definition The indicator is measuring the kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity consumption in Government buildings
Purpose/importance To contribute towards reduction of energy and mitigate against Greenhouse gas emissions
Source/collection of
data Data collection to be drawn from Municipal bills / Regions through Energy Audits / baseline determination.
Method of calculation Simple reading of kWh
Data limitations Non-delivery of Municipal Bills/Incomplete Energy Audits
Type of indicator Output/Service
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly.
New indicator No
Desired performance Achieving the reduction in energy usage in support of National Energy Efficiency Strategy
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 151 of 156
Indicator 6.3
Indicator title Reduction in kilolitre -(kl) usage achieved on water consumption
Short definition The indicator is measuring the water consumption in volumes.
Purpose/importance To contribute towards water security
Source/collection of
data Data collection to be drawn from Municipal bills/ Meter readings
Method of calculation Simple reading of kl
Data limitations Non-delivery of Municipal Bills/Faulty meters
Type of indicator Output/Service
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance Achievement of reduction on water consumption contributing towards water security
Indicator
responsibility Chief Director: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 152 of 156
6.1.B UNSCHEDULED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
Indicator 6.4
Indicator title Percentage efficiency (turnaround time) for unscheduled maintenance on
freehold property within 5 days
Short definition Handling of incoming requests/complaints via telephone, emails and SMS’s from clients through a centralized help-desk
Purpose/importance To ensure all calls are logged, routed to relevant departments for execution and provide feedback on status of each call logged to the requestor/complainant
Source/collection of
data Call centre reports
Method of calculation Turnaround time expressed as a percentage
Data limitations Accuracy of data
Type of indicator Output- call centre report- open and closed calls
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Monthly and annually
New indicator No
Desired performance Efficient buildings- energy, environmental, health; safety
Indicator
responsibility Head: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 153 of 156
Indicator 6.5
Indicator title Number of work opportunities created through maintenance programmes
(DPW’s EPWP Targets)
Short definition Enable creation of work opportunities through DPW/EPWP programme
Purpose/importance To contribute to job creation and skills development initiatives of DPW
Source/collection of
data Monthly employment figures from Regional offices and HR reports
Method of calculation Simple count of work opportunities
Data limitations Delay in recruitment and selection criteria
Type of indicator Output- work opportunities
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator No
Desired performance DPW’s EPWP targets are achieved
Indicator
responsibility Head: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 154 of 156
Indicator 6.6
Indicator title Number of Building Management Systems installed
Short definition A computerized system that provides a single-point of managing all the building’s equipment(mechanical and electrical),energy management and environment
Purpose/importance To control and monitor building’s components including lighting and energy efficiency to reduce the life cycle costs and provide efficient facilities
Source/collection of
data Planned Maintenance/Identified buildings for installations
Method of calculation Simple count
Data limitations No specific limitations
Type of indicator Output- management system installed
Calculation type Non-Cumulative
Reporting cycle Quarterly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance Efficient buildings- energy, environmental, health; safety
Indicator
responsibility Head: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 155 of 156
Indicator 6.7
Indicator title Percentage of Facilities Management contracts allocated towards BBBEE
Short definition Management contracts allocated in support of the BBBEE
Purpose/importance To ensure transformation in the facilities Management industry
Source/collection of
data The source of the data is based on register of contracts awarded
Method of calculation Amount spent on FM contract
Data limitations Monitoring tool
Type of indicator Output- FM contract value /spend ids for BBBEE companies
Calculation type Cumulative
Reporting cycle Monthly
New indicator Yes
Desired performance DPW’s EPWP targets are achieved
Indicator
responsibility Head: Facilities Management
PMTE – ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Page 156 of 156