Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC
-
Upload
rachit-gupta -
Category
Documents
-
view
81 -
download
3
Transcript of Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC
![Page 1: Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082807/553da3275503461f418b46e2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Properties of Laplace Transform The Laplace transform has a set of properties in parallel with that of the Fourier transform. The difference is that we need to pay special attention to the ROCs. In the following, we always assume
Linearity
( means set contains or equals to set , i.e,. is a subset of , or is a superset of .)
It is obvious that the ROC of the linear combination of and should be
the intersection of the their individual ROCs in which both and
exist. But also note that in some cases when zero-pole cancellation occurs,
the ROC of the linear combination could be larger than , as shown in the example below.
Example: Let
then
![Page 2: Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082807/553da3275503461f418b46e2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
We see that the ROC of the combination is larger than the intersection of the ROCs of the two individual terms.
Time Shifting
Shifting in s-Domain
Note that the ROC is shifted by , i.e., it is shifted vertically by (with
no effect to ROC) and horizontally by .
Time Scaling
Note that the ROC is horizontally scaled by , which could be either positive (
) or negative ( ) in which case both the signal and the ROC of its Laplace transform are horizontally flipped.
Conjugation
Proof:
Convolution
![Page 3: Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082807/553da3275503461f418b46e2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Note that the ROC of the convolution could be larger than the intersection of
and , due to the possible pole-zero cancellation caused by the convolution, similar to the linearity property.
Example Assume
then
Differentiation in Time Domain
This can be proven by differentiating the inverse Laplace transform:
In general, we have
Again, multiplying by may cause pole-zero cancellation and therefore the
resulting ROC may be larger than .
Example: Given
![Page 4: Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082807/553da3275503461f418b46e2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
we have:
Differentiation in s-Domain
This can be proven by differentiating the Laplace transform:
Repeat this process we get
Integration in Time Domain
This can be proven by realizing that
and therefore by convolution property we have
![Page 5: Properties of Laplace Transform_ROC](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082807/553da3275503461f418b46e2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Also note that as the ROC of is the right half plane ,
the ROC of is the intersection of the two individual ROCs
, except if pole-zero cancellation occurs (when
with ) in which case the ROC is the entire s-pane.