PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH...

77
GRAVEL - No Samples were collected due to sloughing. Hole was carried out using wet rotary. GP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1061 1060 1059 1058 1057 1056 1055 1054 1053 1052 COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 m COMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014 COMMENTS 10 Page 1 of 5 LOGGED BY: PE REVIEWED BY: FA PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell DEPTH (m) SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 ELEVATION (m) LOG OF TESTHOLE SAFM2.GPJ UMA_COC.GDT PRINT: 7/10/14 By: LIQUID PLASTIC M.C. 25 50 75 SOIL SYMBOL USC NO RECOVERY SAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01 PROJECT NO.: 60309815 ELEVATION (m): 1061.488 GRAB CORE SPLIT SPOON BULK CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159 METHOD: Wet Rotary PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling SAND GRAVEL SLOUGH GROUT BENTONITE CUTTINGS BACKFILL TYPE SAMPLE # SAMPLE TYPE

Transcript of PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH...

Page 1: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

GRAVEL - No Samples were collected due to sloughing. Hole was carried out using wetrotary.

GP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1061

1060

1059

1058

1057

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.488GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159

METHOD: Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 2: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 34.2 ohm-mSO4: 64 mg/LCl: 13 mg/LpH: 7.98

Su = 201 kPa

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 82 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, moderately weathered, moderately strong,laminated, some silt/ mudstone layers, medium plastic, damp, dark grey.

- extremely weak

GP

CS

C1

C2

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.488GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159

METHOD: Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

6.5

9.1

Page 3: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 16.9 ohm-mSO4: 54 mg/LCl: 16mg/LpH: 8.37

Su = 114 kPa

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 68 %

Recovery = 86 %RQD = 68 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 77 %

- highly weathered, Extremely weak

CS

C3

C4

C5

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.488GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159

METHOD: Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

10.4

Page 4: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 63 %

Su = 19.15 MPa

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 97 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 94 %

- some sandstone layering (fine grained)

- medium strong

SANDSTONE - fine grained, fresh jointed, very thinly bedded, silty, damp, grey.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, moderately weathered, moderately weak, verythinly bedded, slightly practured, grey, damp.

CS

SS

CS

C6

C7

C8

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014

COMMENTS

40

Page 4 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

30

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.488GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159

METHOD: Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 5: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 85 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 95 %

END OF TESTHOLE at 45.5 mBGS- Water level at 3.5 mBGS at completion- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 15.0 m- Backfilled with bentonite chips- Water level 3.52 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 24, 2014- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C9

C10

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

1013

1012

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/23/2014

COMMENTS

50

Page 5 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

40

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-01

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.488GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5605847.29 E 291197.159

METHOD: Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 6: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 8.40 ohm-mSO4: 160 mg/LCl: 28 mg/LpH: 7.61

Res: 12.1 ohm-mSO4: 120 mg/LCl: 33 mg/LpH: 7.79

30

57

60/150mm

50/125mm

TOPSOIL (75mm) - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.GRAVEL - Sandy, Silty, Trace clay, trace to some cobbles, occasional boulder,rounded, compact to dense, damp, some sand layering, brown.

- Slight increase in clay content

- Satuarted, hole sloughing

OR

GP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1061

1060

1059

1058

1057

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

COMPLETION DEPTH: 21.35 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/22/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-02

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.181GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606036.403 E 291214.829

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

Page 7: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 14.9 ohm-mSO4: 150 mg/LCl: 8.7 mg/LpH: 8.47

Res: 11.5 ohm-mSO4: 145 mg/LCl: 32.5 mg/LpH: 8.01

50/100mm

50/100mm

GP

15

16

17

18

19

20

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

COMPLETION DEPTH: 21.35 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/22/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-02

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.181GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606036.403 E 291214.829

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

Page 8: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

END OF TESTHOLE at 21.35 mBGS- Water and slough @ 4 mBGS upon completion- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.2 m- Water level 3.48 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 24, 2014- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

GP

21

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

COMPLETION DEPTH: 21.35 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/22/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-02

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1061.181GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606036.403 E 291214.829

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 9: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 52%Sand : 31%Silt and Clay : 17%

LL : 26.8PL : 18.7PI : 8.1

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 67 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 65 %

21

18

91

115

TOPSOIL - Trace Clay, rootlets, silty, organics, damp, layering, Black.

CLAY - Silty, sandy, medium plastic, stiff, moist, sand laminations, oxidized.

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay.

GRAVEL - Sandy, silty, some clay, trace cobbles, compact, poorly graded, moist,dark brown.

- Saturated

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, very hard, trace sandstone layering, somecoal laminations, damp, mottled grey/Dark grey/ Black (coal).

- clayshale, blue grey, weak

- oxidized @ 7.2 to 7.4m

SILTSTONE - light brown, strong

- weak claystone

- siltstone, weak, weathered

CLAYSHALE - medium strong, light grey

OR

CI

SM

GP

CS

SI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

C2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1059

1058

1057

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1050

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/15/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-03

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1059.338GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606384.788 E 291591.545

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

>>

34.9

27.4

15.6

11.2

9.1

9

10.6

13.2

15.7

15.6

8.6

Page 10: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 58 %

LL : 23.8PL : 19.3PI : 4.5

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 77 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 83 %

Recovery = 100 %

- siltstone, medium strong, slightly weathered

- medium strong to weak, dark blue grey clay shale, weathered.

SILTSTONE - fresh joints, olive to dark grey

CLAYSHALE - medium strong, dark grey

- siltstone @ 14.0-14.6m

SILTSTONE - medium strong, fractured, dark grey

- sandstone, fine grained

- claystone/clayshale, weak, olive grey

- claystone, highly weathered

CS

SI

CS

SI

C3

C4

C5

C6

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/15/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-03

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1059.338GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606384.788 E 291591.545

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

10.6

5.8

Page 11: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

RQD = 78 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

- weak, dark grey, clayshale- fresh joints

CLAYSHALE - weak

END OF HOLE at 21.35 mBGS- hole backfilled with bentonite chips to 5.3 m- 50 mm MW installed to 5.2 m- Water level 3.15 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 24, 2014- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

SI

CS

C7

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/15/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-03

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1059.338GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606384.788 E 291591.545

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

Page 12: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 60 %Sand : 25 %Silt and Clay : 15 %

Gravel : 4.7%Sand : 20.3%Silt : 59.3%Clay : 15.7%

Recovery = 86 %RQD = 52 %

50

31

50/125mm

50/75mm

50/50mm

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, some silt, moist, black.CLAY - Sandy, some silt, medium plastic, firm, moist, trace sand laminations,oxidized, brown.

GRAVEL - Sandy, some clay, some silt, trace cobbles, dense to very dense, wet,brown.

- Saturate/free water, dense

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, occasional silt laminations, trace gravel,wet, oxidized, brown.

SILT - Some fine sand, trace clay, very dense, damp, brown.

CLAYSHALE - olive grey to dark grey, weak to medium strong, weathered

- olive grey to dark grey, weak

- moderate to highly weathered from 9.15 to 10.7m

- 10.7m to 12.2m- medium strong

OR

CI

GP

SM

ML

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-04

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057.01GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606731.206 E 291864.093

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

>>

20.3

23.4

3.5

12.3

10.7

15.2

14.3

12.8

15.5

13.5

16.5

12.8

Page 13: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 55 %

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 61 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 69 %

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 77 %

- clayshale, highly weathered

SILTSTONE

- weak claystone

- fresh joints

- Olive grey, weak siltstone

- weak, olive grey, clayshale

- weak, fresh joints, siltstone, olive to dark grey, siltstone

- medium strong siltstone, slighly weathered

CLAYSHALE- weathered, weak, clayshale/claystone

SILTSTONE - weak to medium strong siltstone

CS

SI

CS

SI

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-04

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057.01GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606731.206 E 291864.093

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

11.4

6.7

Page 14: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 84 %

CLAYSHALE - weathered, weak, clayshale/claystone, olive grey

SILTSTONE

CLAYSHALE - weak, olive grey

SILTSTONE - medium strong, siltstone

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- Water level 2.5 mBGS at testhole completion- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 2.3 mBGS- Water level 2.69 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 24, 2014- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

SI

CS

SI

CS

SI

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-04

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057.01GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606731.206 E 291864.093

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 15: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 0%Sand : 23.6%Silt : 55.7%Clay : 20.7%

LL : 25.1PL : 16.6PI : 8.5

12

14

16

15

21

72

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.SILT - Some fine sand, trace clay, non plastic, compact, damp, oxidized, brown.

- Slight increase in clay content

- Increase in sand content

CLAY TILL - Some sand, silty, trace gravel, low plastic, very stiff, moist, tracefine sand/silt, laminations, trace coal inclusions, oxidized, brown.

CLAY - Silty, trace sand, medium plastic, stiff, moist, trace silt laminations,oxidized, trace coal, brown.

- Sand layer ~ 50mm

- Some clay till layers- Some water and sand

GRAVEL - Clayey, silty, some sand, cobbles, occasional boulder, compact todense, moist, sand/silt laminations, brown.CLAY TILL - Some sand, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, very hard,damp to moist, occasional fine sand/silt laminations, oxidized, brown.

- Traces of clayshale layering

OR

ML

CL

CI

GP

CI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1063

1062

1061

1060

1059

1058

1057

1056

1055

1054

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/24/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-05

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1063.802GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607019.251 E 292293.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

10.1

10.2

12

20.5

18.3

15.9

16.9

16.7

21.1

18.4

16.9

22.3

12.4

35.2

Page 16: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 40.2PL : 24.3PI : 15.9

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 74 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 67 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 72 %

69

50/150mm

- grey, very hard

CLAY - Very silty, trace sand, medium plastic, damp, (powdery) sand/siltlaminations, oxidized, brown.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, damp, slightly fractured,moderately weathered, laminated.

- oxidized, badly fractured

- oxidized, badly fractured, siltstone

- medium strong to weak, olive to dark grey

- weak to medium strong, olive to dark grey

- weak, olive grey

CI

CI

CS

14

15

16

17

C1

C2

C3

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/24/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-05

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1063.802GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607019.251 E 292293.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

19.4

12.3

14.6

5.5

9.9

Page 17: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 86 %

- weak

- siltstone

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.5 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C4

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/24/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-05

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1063.802GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607019.251 E 292293.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 18: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 26.8PL : 16.3PI : 10.5

Gravel : 1.5%Sand : 16.2%Silt : 50.2%Clay : 32.1%

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 64 %

14

23

67

64

50/25mm

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.CLAY - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, stiff, moist, silt laminations,numerous white stains, oxidized, brown.

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic, very stiff, moist, tracesand laminations, oxidized, Trace coal, brown.

- Clay layering

- Hard to very hard

CLAYSHALE - weak, light brown

- siltstone

- olive grey, weak to medium strong

OR

CI

CL

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-06

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.376GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607111.102 E 292738.266

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

17

14.5

17.6

16.7

19.2

15.9

13.5

13.2

14.7

10.6

79.7

Page 19: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 65 %

Recovery = 100%RQD = 76%

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 93 %

Recovery = 100 %

- weak

- weak, olive grey

- olive grey, weak to medium strong

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-06

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.376GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607111.102 E 292738.266

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

11.8

Page 20: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

RQD = 63 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 83 %

- siltstone, olive grey

- dark grey, weak becoming stronger with depth

- olive grey

- weak

- medium strong to weak

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.4 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 7 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/25/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-06

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.376GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607111.102 E 292738.266

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 21: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 10.4 ohm-mSO4: 170 mg/LCl: 20 mg/LpH: 7.86

Su = 2.85 MPa

41

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.SILT - Trace fine sand, some clay, slight plasticity, soft, saturated, trace rootlets,oxidized, brown.

GRAVEL - Sandy, silty, trace clay, dense, some cobbles, boulders, poorlygraded, sand/silt laminations, saturated, brown.

CLAYSHALE - silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, hard, damp, trace finesand/silt laminations, grey.

- weak, blue to olive grey

OR

MI

GP

CS

1

2

3

4

NR

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-07

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1051.426GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606748.147 E 293027.676

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

35.5

40.4

9.6

15.2

12

16.9

13.3

13.1

9.1

10.1

22.4

21.4

Page 22: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 12.7 ohm-mSO4: 140 mg/LCl: 9.5 mg/LpH: 8.14

Recovery = 50%RQD = 28 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 50 %

Su = 4.8 MPa

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 74 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 73 %

- very weak, broken, blue to olive grey

- weak to medium strong, blue to olive grey

- olive grey, weak

- weak

- weak

- weak

- weak

CS

C1

C2

C3

C4

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-07

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1051.426GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606748.147 E 293027.676

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

10.8

11.2

Page 23: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 78 %

Su = 15.4 MPa

Recovery = 90 %RQD = 74 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 80 %

- dark grey

- olive grey, medium strong to weak

- siltstone, medium grey

- siltstone- clayshale/claystone, weak to medium strong, dark to olive grey

- dark grey

- very strong, olive to dark grey

- medium strong to weak

CS

C5

C6

C7

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-07

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1051.426GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606748.147 E 293027.676

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 24: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 76 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 84 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 83 %

- olive grey, medium strong to weak

- siltstone

- medium strong to weak

- weak to medium strong, dark olive grey

- medium strong

- siltstone, fresh machine joints

- strong, olive to dark grey

- weak

CS

C8

C9

C10

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

1013

1012

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

40

Page 4 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

30

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-07

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1051.426GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606748.147 E 293027.676

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 25: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 93 %

- medium strong

- weak

- sandstone, very fine grained, medium grey

END OF TESTHOLE at 45.4- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 7.8 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 25th at client's request

CS

C11

C12

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

1011

1010

1009

1008

1007

1006

1005

1004

1003

1002

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

50

Page 5 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

40

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-07

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1051.426GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606748.147 E 293027.676

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 26: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 64 %Sand : 28 %Silt and Clay : 8 %

LL : 24.2PL : 18.6PI : 5.6

Recovery = 89 %RQD = 56 %

LL : 38.4PL : 28.3PI : 10.1

33

28

TOPSOIL - Organics, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.SAND - Fine grained, clayey, some silt, trace rootlets, loose, wet, brown.

GRAVEL - Sandy, silty, trace clay, cobbles, trace boulders, pounded, wet, brown.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, weak, moderately weathered, very thinlybedded/horizontal, severely fractured.

- sandstone, Slightly weathered, very thinly bedded/horizontal, fine grained, grey.

- Siltstone, Moderately weathered, thinly bedded/horizotal, slightly fractured, 45degree plane, grey.

- Clayshale, Silty, trace fine sand, weak, moderately weathered, very thinlybedded/horizontal, severely fractured.

OR

SM

GP

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

COMPLETION DEPTH: 23.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-08

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1050.269GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606880.005 E 293283.318

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

22.4

19.8

6

7.5

9.8

13.1

10.7

10.1

7.6

7.3

10.3

Page 27: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

Recovery = 94 %RQD = 75 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 67 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 64 %

SILTSTONE - Moderately weathered, thinly bedded/horizotal, slightly fractured,grey.

CLAYSHALE - weak, dark to olive grey

- Oxidized

SILTSTONE - Moderately weathered, thinly bedded/horizotal, slightly fractured,grey.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, weak, moderately weathered, very thinlybedded/horizontal, severely fractured.

SILTSTONE - Slightly weathered, thinly bedded/horizontal.

CS

SI

CS

SI

CS

SI

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

COMPLETION DEPTH: 23.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-08

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1050.269GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606880.005 E 293283.318

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

10.3

13.9

Page 28: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 67 %

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, weak, moderately weathered, very thinlybedded/horizontal, severely fractured.

- slightly weathered.

- moderately weathered, very thinly bedded/horizontal, weak, moderately toseverly fractured, dark grey.

END OF HOLE at 23.5 mBGS- Water level 2 mBGS at completion- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.8 mBGS- Water level 2.11 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 22, 2014- Decommissioned on April 25th at client's request

SI

CSC6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

COMPLETION DEPTH: 23.50 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/27/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-08

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1050.269GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5606880.005 E 293283.318

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 29: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 26.9PL : 15.5PI : 11.3

Gravel : 14.6%Sand : 8.1%Silt : 51.2%Clay : 26.1%

Su = 44 kPa

LL : 38.3PL : 25.4PI : 12.9

Recovery = 92 %RQD = 65 %

6

82

30

33

50/100mm

TOPSOIL (150mm) - Organic, rootlets, fibrous, silty, damp, blackCLAY - Silty, some fine sand, medium plastic, soft, damp, fine sand laminations,oxidized, light brown

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic, firm, moist, fine sand/siltlaminations, oxidized, brown.

- Fine sand/silt laminations

- Gravelly

- very stiff to hard

CLAYSHALE - medium strong to weak, olive grey, fresh joints.

- medium strong to weak, olive to dark grey, fresh joints.

OR

CI

CL

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/11/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-10

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: Sta 5607616.476

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

13.7

14.6

17.1

18.9

16

13.3

14

16

9.4

7

12.3

8.5

Page 30: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 63 %

Su = 15.7 MPa

LL : 26.5PL : 23.9PI : 2.6Recovery = 100 %RQD = 81 %

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 86 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 86 %

- strong , olive grey

- medium strong to weak

- siltstone, olive grey

- olive grey, medium strong to weak

- medium strong

- weak to medium strong.

- olive to dark grey

- weak to medium strong

- sandstone, fine grained, dark grey

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/11/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-10

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: Sta 5607616.476

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 31: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 59 %

- olive to dark grey

- sandstone, fine grained, strong, dark grey

- olive to dark grey, weak,

- medium strong

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.1 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 6.4 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/11/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-10

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1057GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: Sta 5607616.476

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 32: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 0%Sand : 68%Silt & Clay : 32%

Gravel : 3.6%Sand : 25.9%Silt : 54.4%Clay : 16.1%

LL : 21.7PL : 12PI : 9.7No Recovery

10

8

14

14

91

TOPSOILSAND - Silty, some clay, slight plasticity, loose, damp to dry, fine grained, tracerootlets, light brown

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, loose, damp, oxidised, brown

CLAY TILL - Sandy, silty, trace gravel, low plastic, moist, stiff, trace coal, finesand/silt laminations, oxidized, brown

Increasing sand content

SANDSTONE - No recovery - Rock stuck in core barrel

- olive grey

OR

SM

SP

CL

SS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/12/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-11

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1049.749GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607888.003 E 294315.287

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

6.4

6.7

8.3

8.2

9.8

10.4

22.2

20.5

14.8

12

12.3

Page 33: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 93 %

Su = 28 kPa

Recovery = 93 %RQD = 59 %

Su = 13.4 MPa

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 68 %

Recovery = 86 %RQD = 48 %

CLAYSHALE - olive grey, extremely weak to highly weathered

SILTSTONE - olive grey

- olive grey, siltstone

CLAYSHALE - oilive grey, very weak, fractured

- oilve grey, weak to medium strong, siltstone layers

- olive grey, very weak, fractured

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey, medium strong

- missing core

- olive grey, medium strong to weak. Last 25cm of run is badly fractured.

CS

SI

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/12/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-11

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1049.749GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607888.003 E 294315.287

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

6.7

Page 34: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 96 %

- grey, medium strong

- light grey, widely spaced joints, clayey siltstone

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.1 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 12.7 mBGS- Water level 8.24 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/12/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-11

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1049.749GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5607888.003 E 294315.287

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 35: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 1%Sand : 65%Silt & Clay : 34%

LL : 31.7PL : 18.1PI : 13.6

LL : 29.1PL : 21PI : 8.2

Recovery = 83 %RQD = 48 %

8

9

8

50/150mm

50/15mm

TOPSOIL - Organics, rootlets, fiberous, silty, damp, black.SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, loose, damp, brown.

CLAY - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, stiff, moist to wet, oxidized, trace finesand/silt laminations, brown.

- wet, firm

- saturated, free water

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, very stiff, moist, trace sandlaminations, oxidized, Trace coal, brown.- sand layering, hard, carbonaceous

CLAYSHALE - oxidized, missing

- siltstone, oxidized, badly fractured

- weak to medium strong, dark grey to olive grey

- siltstone, olive grey

- medium strong to weak, olive grey

OR

SM

CI

CI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C1

11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1056

1055

1054

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/30/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-12

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.533GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608492.222 E 293465.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

6.3

8.4

8.3

22.8

24.2

23.9

22.1

21.4

12.5

19.3

11.9

17

Page 36: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 79 %

Recovery = 90 %RQD = 58 %

Recovery = 92 %RQD = 75 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 77 %

- olive grey

- medium strong to weak

- dark olive grey, medium strong, fresh joints

- medium strong to weak, olive grey

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/30/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-12

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.533GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608492.222 E 293465.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

8.2

6.9

Page 37: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 71 %

END OF HOLE at 24.2 mBGS- Water at 3.2 mBGS upon completion- no standpipe installed (land owner did not allow)

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/30/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-12

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1056.533GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608492.222 E 293465.696

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 38: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 19.8PL : 14.5PI : 5.3

Gravel : 8%Sand : 45%Silt & Clay : 47%

LL : 30.8PL : 18.6PI : 12.2

Recovery - %RQD - 73%

Su = 13.5 MPa

7

18

25

50/75mm

TOPSOILFILL - Clay (Till), Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, moist, tracesandy layers, trace rootlets, oxidized, brown

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic, firm, moist, sandylaminations, trace coal, oxidized, brown

Very sandy

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, trace gravel, wet, silt laminations, oxidized,brown

CLAY - Very, silty, dry, medium plastic, hard

CLAYSHALE - trace oxidised, weak

- Missing core

- trace oxidised, weak

- Fine grained, sandstone

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey, weak- olive grey

OR

FILL

CL

SM

CI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-13

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1047.17GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608680.868 E 294373.3

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

13.4

13.2

23.2

17.2

17.6

16.4

18.1

14.7

14.7

10.9

Page 39: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery - 100%RQD - 73%

Su = 43.5 kPa

Recovery - 100%RQD - 67%

Recovery - 100%RQD - 75%

Recovery - 100%RQD - 82%

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey

- olive grey, medium strong

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-13

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1047.17GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608680.868 E 294373.3

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 40: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery - 100%RQD - 85%

- olive grey, strong

- olive grey, medium strong

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- Water level 3.1 mBGS upon completion- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.1 mBGS- Water level 2.26 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-13

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1047.17GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608680.868 E 294373.3

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 41: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 21.1PL : 16.6PI : 4.5

LL : 20.4PL : 17.1PI : 3.3

Gravel : 0.2%Sand : 39.4%Silt : 41.7%Clay : 18.7%

Recovery = 83 %RQD = 54 %

10

12

54

77

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlet, fiberous, trace silt, damp, black.

CLAY - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic, stiff, moist, trace sandlaminations, oxidized, brown.

- Very sandy, trace coal, trace gravel

- Very Silty layer

SILT - Some fine sand, trace clay, trace gravel, low to non plastic, oxidized,brown.

- Sand- Dry, no water

CLAYSHALE - half missing, very weak, lots of fractures.

- very weak to weak, olive grey

- medium strong to weak

- very weak , then weak to medium strong

OR

CL

ML

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE:

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-14

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1046.886GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608993.269 E 294376.242

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

17.3

22.1

16

17.8

15.2

14.3

15.1

20.3

19.9

11.2

Page 42: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 81 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 67 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 77 %

Recovery = 80 %RQD = 71 %

- siltstone, very strong

- medium strong

- fractured siltstone- weak to medium strong, clayshale

- siltstone

- weak to medium strong, centre of run very strong for 40cm

- medium strong to weak

- siltstone

- weak to medium strong

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE:

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-14

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1046.886GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608993.269 E 294376.242

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

11

Page 43: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 93 %

- weak to medium strong

- medium strong

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.4 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 2.48 mBGS

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE:

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-14

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1046.886GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5608993.269 E 294376.242

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 44: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 4.2%Sand : 32.0%Silt : 53.4%Clay : 10.4%

LL : 18.8PL : 14.1PI : 4.7

LL : 32.1PL : 17.3PI : 14.8

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 77 %

26

27

48

60/25mm

TOPSOIL (100 mm)CLAY - Silty, sandy, low plastic, stiff, moist, sand & silt, laminations, oxidized.

-Gravely

-Sandstone layering

-Wet to saturated

-Trace Gravel-Very silty

CLAY TILL - Some sand, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, hard, moist,trace sand/silt laminations oxidized, brown.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, hard, damp, silt lamination,grey.

- weak, weathered, broken

SILTSTONE - light grey

CLAYSHALE - weak, olive grey

- weak to medium strong, olive grey, fresh joints

OR

CL

CI

CS

SI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-15

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.352GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609526.068 E 294696.463

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

>>

15.7

5.7

6.4

17.1

13.5

15

12.8

10.8

16.4

16.2

Page 45: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 82 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 83 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 82 %

Recovery = 100 %

SILTSTONE - 10.6 to 11.1m - mod weak, rest of run - medium strong

- very hard

CLAYSHALE - dark grey, weak

- weak to medium strong,

- harder clayshale

- fine grained to very fine grained sandstone

- weak to medium strong, dark grey to olive grey, slightly weathered

CS

SI

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-15

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.352GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609526.068 E 294696.463

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

9.4

8.7

Page 46: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

RQD = 82 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

SILTSTONE - medium strong, fresh joints, lightly weathered

CLAYSHALE - weak, lots of fractures

END OF HOLE at 24.4 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.5 mbGS

CS

SI

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-15

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.352GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609526.068 E 294696.463

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

13.3

Page 47: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 35%Sand : 28%Silt and Clay : 37%

Gravel : 4%Sand : 25%Silt and Clay : 71%

Recovery = 95 %RQD = 50 %

33

89

50/50mm

TOPSOIL (100 mm)GRAVEL - 75 mm, sandy, silty, some clay, poorly graded, dense, damp, lightbrown.

CLAY TILL - laminations, oxidized, brown.

- sandy, trace clay, trace gravel, hard to very hard, oxidized, brown

- silt

CLAYSHALE - weathered, silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, strong,moderatly weathered with silt, mudstone layers, damp, grey.

SILTSTONE - strong siltstone, first 70cm fractured & oxidized, then dark grey,fractured

CLAYSHALE - weak, dark grey

SILTSTONE - fractured

- dark grey

CLAYSHALE - medium strong, fractured

OR

GP

CI

CS

SI

CS

SI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-16

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.394GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609515.49 E 294925.107

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

>>

4.3

10

7.9

14.3

13.4

13.5

13.6

7.5

6.6

9.6

Page 48: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 60 %

Recovery = 95 %RQD = 58 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

Recovery = 100 %

SILTSTONE - medium strong

CLAYSHALE - weak, moderately weathered, dark grey

- medium strong, dark grey

- strong, siltstone

- dark grey, medium strong, fresh joints

- fresh joints, medium strong to weak

- medium strong, dark grey, fresh joints

SI

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-16

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.394GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609515.49 E 294925.107

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

10.3

13.7

Page 49: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

RQD = 87 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 82 %

- fractured

- weak, dark grey, fractured

- fractured, siltstone

- weak to medium strong, dark grey, weathered

END OF HOLE at 24.4 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.5 mBGS- Water level 2.26 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/17/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-16

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1043.394GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609515.49 E 294925.107

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

Page 50: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 0 %Sand : 54 %Silt and Clay : 46%

Recovery = %RQD = 52 %

10

28

95/75mm

75/100mm

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlest, fiberous, silty, trace clay, damp, black.CLAY TILL - Very silty, some sand, trace to some gravel, low to medium plastic,stiff, moist, fine sand and silt laminations, oxidized, brown.

SAND - Fine grained, very silty, some clay, loose to compact, saturated, brown.

- Increase in clay content, occasional clay till layer

- silt layer

SANDSTONE - brown, weak

- medium strong, grey

CLAYSHALE - medium strong becoming stronger with depth

- weak to medium strong, fresh joints, dark olive grey

OR

CI

SM

SS

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.00 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/16/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-17

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1041.384GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609621.149 E 295227.321

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

8.5

8.8

15.5

19

14.6

18.3

12.7

21.1

9.3

8.5

Page 51: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 73 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 85 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 88 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 93 %

- medium strong, olive grey

- siltstone

- medium strong to weak, olive grey

- olive to dark grey, medium strong, few fresh joints

- medium strong to weak, olive grey

- siltstone, fresh joints

- olive grey to dark grey

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.00 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/16/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-17

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1041.384GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609621.149 E 295227.321

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

10

4.5

Page 52: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 90 %

- medium strong to weak, olive grey

- siltstone, light grey

END OF TESTHOLE at 24 mBGS- Water level 1.5 mBGS at testhole completion- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 5.8 mBGS- Water level 2.04 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 24, 2014

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

1013

1012

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.00 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/16/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-17

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1041.384GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609621.149 E 295227.321

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 53: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 2 %Sand : 73 %Silt and Clay : 25 %

Gravel : 55 %Sand : 28 %Silt and Clay : 17 %

LL : 29.5PL : 15.3PI : 14.2

13

13

38

40

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, fiberous, trace silt, damp, black.SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, compact, damp, trace gravel, oxidized,brown.

- Silt

- Clay layer (100 mm)GRAVEL - Sandy, silty, trace clay, comapct, trace silt, laminations, oxidized,damp, brown.

- Saturated

- Increase in clay content, occasional cobbles, dense, moist.

CLAY TILL - Some sand, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic to medium plastic,hard, trace fine sand/ silt lamination, oxidized, brown.

- Silt layer

CLAYSHALE - olive grey, first half weak, second half stronger with depth

OR

SM

GP

CI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/21/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-18

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1040.148GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609489.353 E 295633.237

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

4.1

5.1

14.1

5.6

12.3

7.9

13.4

11.8

14.6

15.5

14.7

12.4

17

Page 54: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 96 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 91 %

Recovery = 98 %RQD = 90 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 85 %

- olive grey, first 300mm -very strong, rest of run- moderately weak to moderatelystrong

- medium strong

- siltstone

- weak

- weak, dark grey

- medium strong

CS

C1

C2

C3

C4

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/21/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-18

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1040.148GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609489.353 E 295633.237

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

15.3

10.1

6.6

Page 55: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 93 %RQD = 90 %

- siltstone

- medium strong

- dark grey, siltstone

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- Water level 2.5 mBGS at testhole completion- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 4.2 mBGS

CS

C5

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

1013

1012

1011

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/21/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-18

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1040.148GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609489.353 E 295633.237

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 56: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

LL : 25.8PL : 18.3PI : 7.5

Gravel : 0.8%Sand : 15.6%Silt :65%Clay : 18.6%

LL : 35.2PL : 17PI : 18.1

Recovery = 95 %RQD = 68 %

5

14

41

45

TOPSOIL - Organic rootlets, fibrous, silty, trace clay, damp, black.

CLAY - Sandy, very silty, trace gravel, low plastic, firm, wet, oxidized, siltlamination, brown.

- Very sandy, stiff

CLAY TILL - some sand, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, hard, moist,trace fine sand/silt laminations, oxidized, brown.

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, strong, moderatlyweathered, interlayered with silt/mudstone layers, damp, grey.

- olive to dark grey, weak, slightly weathered

- siltstone, medium strong, fractured

- weak to medium strong, olive grey, slightly weathered

- medium strong, siltstone

- sandstone, fine grained, light grey

- siltstone, medium strong

OR

CL

CI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/18/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-19

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1036.504GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609592.072 E 296035.35

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

36.1

24.4

22.1

24

16.3

15.5

13.3

14

16.5

14

Page 57: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 87 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 92 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 95 %

Recovery = 95 %

- medium strong, olive grey to dark grey, fresh joints

- weak, olive grey

- medium strong

SANDSTONE - fine grained

- fine grained

- siltstone

CLAYSHALE - very strong

- medium strong to weak, dark grey

- weak, olive grey, weathered- siltstone

- weak to medium strong

CS

SS

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/18/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-19

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1036.504GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609592.072 E 296035.35

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

7.25

10.8

Page 58: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

RQD = 68 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 83 %

- weak to medium strong, fractured

- weak

- fractured, siltstone

- very weak

- weak to medium strong

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.4 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 5.5 mBGS

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1016

1015

1014

1013

1012

1011

1010

1009

1008

1007

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/18/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-19

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1036.504GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609592.072 E 296035.35

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

WEL

LIN

STAL

LATI

ON

Page 59: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 35%Sand : 44%Silt and Clay : 21%

LL : 21.8PL : 16.2PI : 5.7

Gravel : 3%Sand : 22%Silt and Clay : 75%

Recovery = %RQD = 67 %

4

24

64

51/125mm

TOPSOIL (500 mm)

CLAY - Sandy, some silt, medium plastic, soft, wet to saturated.

-Free Water

SAND - Fine grained, some clay, very silty, loose, saturated, oxidized, brown.

GRAVEL - 38 mm max size, sandy, silty, compact, some clay, some silt, wet,brown.

CLAY TILL - Sandy, silty, trace gravel, low plastic, very hard, trace sand/ siltlamination, damp to moist, oxidized, brown.

- Very sandy, sand layering & silty.

SILT - Some fine sand, trace clay, trace gravel, very hard, damp, grey.

SILTSTONE - medium strong, broken, siltstone

- fine grained sandstone

- fractured, dark grey, medium strong, siltstone

CLAYSHALE - weak to medium strong

- weak, fractured, dark grey

OR

CI

SM

GP

CL

ML

SI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/19/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-20

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1035.152GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609444.468 E 296583.721

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

27.7

30.3

25.1

22.7

9.8

18.2

12.4

15

13.6

7.1

Page 60: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 58 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 90 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 78 %

Recovery = %RQD = 77 %

- medium strong, fractured, siltstone, med grey

- fine grained, fractured sandstone

- weak to medium strong, dark grey, fractured

SILTSTONE - dark grey

CLAYSHALE - weak to medium strong, dark grey to 12.8m then medium to olivegrey, fractured

- medium strong

SILTSTONE - fractured

- medium strong, dark grey

SANDSTONE - fine grained, fractured

SILTSTONE - dark grey, medium strong

SANDSTONE - fine grained

CS

SI

CS

SI

SS

SI

SS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/19/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-20

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1035.152GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609444.468 E 296583.721

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

12.7

7.9

Page 61: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 82 %

SILTSTONE - dark grey, fractured

CLAYSHALE - weak, olive grey

SILTSTONE - medium strong, light grey

CLAYSHALE - medium to dark grey, fractured

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.6 mBGS- Water level 1.99 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014

SS

SI

CS

SI

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1015

1014

1013

1012

1011

1010

1009

1008

1007

1006

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.30 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/19/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-20

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1035.152GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609444.468 E 296583.721

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 62: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 0%Sand : 75%Silt and Clay : 25%

Gravel : 3%Sand : 42%Silt and Clay : 55%

Gravel : 0%Sand : 6%Silt and Clay : 94%

LL : 30PL : 18.9PI : 11.1

6

8

19

60

51/75mm

58

TOPSOIL - Organic, rootlets, very silty, trace clay, non to low plastic, firm, moist,dark brown/black.

CLAY - Some silt, some fine sand, medium plastic, firm, moist, light brown.

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, loose, saturated, brown.

- Compact

- very silty, some clay.CLAY TILL - Some sand, silty, trace gravel, medium plastic, very stiff, trace finesand/silt laminations.- Very sandy, very silty, low to medium plastic.

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, very dense, saturated, brown.

SILT - Trace Fine sand, trace clay, very stiff, damp, grey.

CLAY TILL - Some sand, silty, trace gravel, low to medium plastic, very stiff,trace fine sand/silt laminations.

SILT/MUDSTONE - very strong, moderately weathered, interlayered withclayshale(silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, medium strong, some finesand/silt laminations, damp, grey).CLAYSHALE

- weak,broken

OR

CI

SM

CI

SM

MI

CL

MU

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/20/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-21

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1034.655GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609436.789 E 297055.749

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

23.5

25.3

28.6

29.1

22.9

20.2

20.5

14

20

19.1

14.9

20.7

14.6

Page 63: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 50 %RQD = 18 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 73 %

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 80 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 80 %

Recovery = 97 %RQD = 79 %

- siltstone, medium strong

- olive grey, lots of fractures

- weak, olive grey

- siltstone, olive grey

- olive grey, weak to medium strong, lots of joints, slightly weathered

SILTSTONE - fresh joints

- fine grained, sandstone

CS

SI

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/20/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-21

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1034.655GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609436.789 E 297055.749

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

1.2

7.1

8.1

Page 64: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100 %RQD = 65 %

CLAYSHALE - medium strong

- weak, olive grey

- weak, dark grey

- dark grey, occ fresh joints

- weak

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.1 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 4.8 mBGS- Water level 2.29 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014

SI

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1014

1013

1012

1011

1010

1009

1008

1007

1006

1005

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/20/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-21

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1034.655GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609436.789 E 297055.749

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 65: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 0%Sand : 28.5%Silt : 57.7%Clay : 13.9%

LL : 33.9PL : 18.9PI : 14.9

Gravel : 0%Sand : 67%Silt & Clay : 33%

LL : 30PL : 18.9PI : 11.1

Res: 9.10 ohm-mSO4: 540 mg/LCl: 54 mg/LpH: 8.04

Gravel : 0%Sand : 15.0%Silt : 79.0%Clay : 6.0%

15

15

49

43

37

30

TOPSOIL - Organic rootlets, fibrous, Silty, damp, black.SILT - Some fine sand, trace to some clay, loose, humid.

SAND - Fine grained, some silt, compact, mosit, brown.

- wet- trace free water

CLAY TILL - Silty, some sand, trace gravel, low to medium plastic, hard, moist,some silt laminations, oxidized, brown.

- 200 mm thick saturated sand layer- Grey, silty

SILT - Some fine sand, trace clay, dense, wet, grey.

- saturated

OR

MI

SM

CL

MI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

COMPLETION DEPTH: 14.00 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 2

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-24

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1034.698GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611240.115 E 297311.779

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

5.3

9.7

5.2

12.2

16

13

11.8

14.8

12.9

20.1

18.7

26.2

24.9

23.6

Page 66: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 10.9 ohm-mSO4: 350 mg/LCl: 18 mg/LpH: 8.08

LL : 33.9PL : 18.9PI : 14.9

CLAYSHALE

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.3 mBGS- Water level 5 mBGS upon completion- 50 mm stand pipe installed to 5.1 mBGS- Stoped drilling at 14 mBGS since it was well below the cut.- sloughing at 10.5 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 23rd at client's request

MI

CS

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

COMPLETION DEPTH: 14.00 mCOMPLETION DATE: 1/31/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 2

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-24

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1034.698GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611240.115 E 297311.779

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

18

23.2

17.4

19.4

21.6

Page 67: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 4.10 ohm-mSO4: 835 mg/LCl: 47.5 mg/LpH: 7.71

Res: 10.6 ohm-mSO4: 140 mg/LCl: 62 mg/LpH: 7.92

Res: 6.70 ohm-mSO4: 500 mg/LCl: 14 mg/LpH: 7.66

11

6

14

4

7

22

TOPSOIL (75 mm) - Organic, rootlets, very silty, trace clay, non to low plastic,firm, moist, dark brown/black.SILT - Trace fine sand, trace clay, stiff, damp to moist, trace rootlets, oxidized,brown.

- 100 mm thick organic layer- clay content increasedCLAY - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, stiff, moist, trace silt laminations,brown.

- wet, firm.

- Saturated sand layers.- free waterSAND - Some silt, trace clay, medium to fine grained, compact, saturated,brown.

SILT - Trace fine sand, trace clay, soft, saturated, dark grey.

CLAY - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, firm (with stiff layers) moist to wet,brownish grey.

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, medium plastic, firm to stiff, sandlaminations, dark grey.

- Slightly increased gravel content

OR

MI

CI

SM

MI

CI

CI

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-25

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1033.805GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611642.649 E 298289.13

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

12.5

10.9

21.5

26.1

25.3

22.9

18.5

26.6

23.5

20.5

19.7

18.9

12.8

13.5

Page 68: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Res: 6.50 ohm-mSO4: 430 mg/LCl: 30 mg/LpH: 8.13

Su = 292.5 kPa

Res: 4.40 ohm-m

84/100mm

53

29

40

64

50/100mm

- numerous sand layers

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, very dense, wet, trace gravel, grey.- Traces bedrock (clay shale layering)

CLAYSHALE - Silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, very hard, damp, silt/finesand laminations, grey.- olive grey, extremely weak

- siltstone

CI

SM

CS

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

C1

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

1018

1017

1016

1015

1014

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-25

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1033.805GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611642.649 E 298289.13

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

>>

10.8

14.7

13.4

11.6

12.5

14.4

12

10.9

12.9

16.4

11.9

8.5

Page 69: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

SO4: 860 mg/LCl: 31 mg/LpH: 8.12

Recovery - 98 %RQD - 78 %

Recovery - 100 %RQD - 90 %

Recovery - 95 %RQD - 90 %

Su = 6.65 MPa

Recovery - 93 %RQD - 70 %

- olive grey, medium strong

- siltstone

- olive grey, medium strong

- medium strong, olive grey

CS

C2

C3

C4

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1013

1012

1011

1010

1009

1008

1007

1006

1005

1004

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-25

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1033.805GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611642.649 E 298289.13

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

7

17.8

Page 70: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery - 100 %RQD - 55 %

Su = 237.5 kPa

Recovery - 97 %RQD - 78 %

Recovery - 97 %RQD - 57 %

- slightly stronger, red coloring end of run

- olive grey, fresh joints

CS

C5

C6

C7

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

1003

1002

1001

1000

999

998

997

996

995

994

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2014

COMMENTS

40

Page 4 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

30

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-25

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1033.805GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611642.649 E 298289.13

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 71: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery - 98 %RQD - 87 %

Recovery - 100 %RQD - 74 %

- siltstone, olive grey

- fractured

- dark grey, very weak

END OF TESTHOLE at 45.4 mBGS- Water level 4.3 mBGS at testhole completion- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 5.1 mBGS- Water level 3.31 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 20, 2014- Decommissioned on April 23rd at client's request

CS

C8

C9

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

993

992

991

990

989

988

987

986

985

984

COMPLETION DEPTH: 45.40 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/1/2014

COMMENTS

50

Page 5 of 5

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

40

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-25

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1033.805GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5611642.649 E 298289.13

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 72: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 33%Sand : 48%Silt & Clay : 19%

Gravel : 11.7%Sand : 42.1%Silt : 36.8%Clay : 9.4%

LL : 20PL : 10.5PI : 9.4

Recivery - %RQD - 45%

Su = 0.42 MPa

46

13

13

22

50/75mm

TOPSOILGRAVEL - Some cobbles, trace boulders, sandy, some silt, dense, well graded,damp to dry, light brown

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, compact, trace gravel, occasional silt layer(50mm)

CLAY - Silty, trace fine sand, low plastic, trace silt laminations, stiff, moist,oxidized, brown

- Increasing sand content

SAND - Fine grained, silty, trace clay, saturated, trace gravel

CLAY - very silty, trace fine sand, medium plastic, very stiff, moist, siltlaminations, dark brown

CLAYSHALE- Silty, trace/some fine sand, medium plastic, very hard, damp, verythinly laminated, grey

- olive grey, medium strong

- olive grey to dark grey, weak and broken.

OR

GP

SM

CL

SM

CI

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-26

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1048.457GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609622.201 E 294009.639

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

>>

4.5

3

3.8

4.9

14.5

22.3

12.8

23.4

16.9

13.8

9.213.2

Page 73: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Su = 39 kPa

Recovery - 100%RQD - 74%

Recovery - %RQD - 65%

Recovery - 100%RQD - 34%

- olive grey to dark grey, frequent joints

- dark grey to olive grey, weak

- dark grey to olive grey

- dark grey to olive grey, weak

- olive grey, medium strong to weak

- olive grey

- olive grey, medium strong to weak

- olive to dark grey, weak, fractured

- olive to dark grey

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-26

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1048.457GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609622.201 E 294009.639

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 74: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery - 100%RQD - 80%

- olive to dark grey, weak

- olive to dark grey, weak to medium strong

- olive to dark grey

- olive to dark grey weak

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.2 mBGS- Water level 5.2 mBGS at testhole completion- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 6.1 mBGS- Water level 3.91 mBGS in standpipe on Feb 23, 2014- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1020

1019

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.20 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/15/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-26

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1048.457GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609622.201 E 294009.639

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 75: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Gravel : 8.7%Sand : 33.0%Silt : 45.0%Clay : 13.3%

LL : 25.7PL : 17.9PI : 7.7

Su = 182.5 kPa

Recovery = 100%RQD = 75%

13

60

52

65

31

TOPSOIL (100 mm)CLAY - Silty, some sand, some gravel, medium plastic, stiff, dry (powdery), lightbrown

SILT - Trace fine sand, trace clay, non plastic, stiff, damp, brown

CLAY TILL - Sandy, some silt, trace gravel, low plastic, stiff to very stiff, moist,silt laminations, oxidized, brown

- Hard, increasing sand and silt laminations

CLAYSHALE - olive to dark grey, medium strong

- Silty, some fine sand, medium plastic, hard, damp, grey

- olive to dark grey, weak to medium strong

OR

CI

ML

CL

CS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

C111

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1053

1052

1051

1050

1049

1048

1047

1046

1045

1044

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/17/2014

COMMENTS

10

Page 1 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

0

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-27

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1053.511GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609616.662 E 293643.58

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

5.4

5

14.2

14.3

10.5

17.9

17.4

15.6

12.7

9.7

14

15.2

Page 76: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100%RQD = 67%

Su = 4.95 MPa

LL : 27.7PL : 22.1PI : 5.6

Recovery = 100%RQD = 70%

Recovery = 100%RQD = 79%

Recovery = 95%RQD = 48%

- olive to dark grey, medium strong

- olive to dark grey, weak to medium strong

- olive to dark grey, strong to medium strong

- olive to dark grey, weak to medium strong

- olive to dark grey, medium strong

- olive to dark grey

- olive to dark grey, medium strong

- olive to dark grey, weak to medium strong

CS

C2

C3

C4

C5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1043

1042

1041

1040

1039

1038

1037

1036

1035

1034

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/17/2014

COMMENTS

20

Page 2 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

10

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-27

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1053.511GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609616.662 E 293643.58

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Page 77: PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility ...€¦ · PROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell TH (m) DEP SOIL DESCRIPTION 10 m) TION ( VA ELE 4 By: /10/1 INT: 7 _COC.GDT PR 2.GPJ

Recovery = 100%RQD = 71%

- olive to dark grey

- olive to dark grey, medium strong

- olive to dark grey, medium strong

- olive to dark grey, weak, broken

END OF TESTHOLE at 24.1 mBGS- 50 mm stand pipe intalled to 6.7 mBGS- Decommissioned on April 22nd at client's request

CS

C6

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

1033

1032

1031

1030

1029

1028

1027

1026

1025

1024

COMPLETION DEPTH: 24.10 mCOMPLETION DATE: 2/17/2014

COMMENTS

30

Page 3 of 3

LOGGED BY: PEREVIEWED BY: FAPROJECT ENGINEER: Stuart Bell

DEP

TH (m

)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

20

ELEV

ATIO

N (m

)

LOG

OF

TE

ST

HO

LE S

AF

M2.

GP

J U

MA

_CO

C.G

DT

PR

INT

: 7/1

0/1

4 B

y:

SPT (Standard Pen Test) (Blows/300mm)

25 50 75

SPT

(N)

LIQUIDPLASTIC M.C.

25 50 75

SOIL

SYM

BOL

USC

NO RECOVERYSAMPLE TYPE SHELBY TUBE

TESTHOLE NO.: TH14-27

PROJECT NO.: 60309815

ELEVATION (m): 1053.511GRAB CORESPLIT SPOON BULK

CLIENT: Alberta Flood Recovery Task Force

COORDINATES: UTM N 5609616.662 E 293643.58

METHOD: Auger/Wet Rotary

PROJECT: South Alberta Flood Mitigation Feasibility Study

LOCATION:

CONTRACTOR: Garrity & Baker Drilling

SANDGRAVEL SLOUGH GROUTBENTONITE CUTTINGSBACKFILL TYPE

SAM

PLE

#

SAM

PLE

TYPE