Project S.A.R.M.E.D Everett Zofchak, Brendan Miller, Zack Yeger, Mike Lamond.
-
Upload
charlene-hawkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
2
Transcript of Project S.A.R.M.E.D Everett Zofchak, Brendan Miller, Zack Yeger, Mike Lamond.
Table of Contents
Project Background
Project Management and Organization
Design Procedure and Methodology
Design Analysis
Technical Analysis of System and Subsystems
Prototype of Final Design
Project Background – Recognizing the Opportunity
We recognize the opportunity to profit off of the ability to market and
promote drinks at events by launching them to fans.
The problem we encountered was slowing down the projectile to a
speed that would be safe.
People believe this device is best for marketing drinks
What Could you see this being used for?
#
Entertainment 8
Marketing 17
Sales 12
Customer Needs:
Ability keep beverage intact Deliver object slowly Sustainable Compact Self-contained Aesthetically pleasing
Design Specifications
Be able to withstand a 10 foot freefall
Deliver drink to fans at 2.5 m/s or less
Prototype costs less that $10 to build
Holds a drink sample of 100 ml (3.4 fluid ounces)
Projectile must have a diameter of 3 inches or less
Determining the Drag Coefficient
Dropped from 5’ 11” (1.8 m)
Multiple trials with multiple layers of trash bags
Use drag coefficient to determine parachute area
Calculations
To determine area of parachute.
To determine side length of octagonal
parachute.
Free body diagram at terminal velocity.
Bill of MaterialsQuantity
Description
Part # Cost
1 Smart Water 700 ml
N/A $1.50
2 Gelatin Shot Container
H9P2T8 $.20
1 Wegmans Tall Kitchen Bag
$.20
Total Cost
$1.90
Quantity
Description
Part # Cost
100(grams)
$.03/gABS Plastic
N/A $3.00
.45 Plastic Sheet
552468941
$.30
TotalCost
$3.30
Conclusion
Problem: speed
Best Design
Cost of prototype
Cost of finished product
Failures we encountered
References
terminal velocity (2013). (1st ed.) Oxford University Press
PARACHUTES: REMARKABLE NEW DESIGN. (1928, ). The Times of India (1861-Current