Project report- Impact of Supply Management on Project Management-PPP Projects
-
Upload
harsha-kestur -
Category
Business
-
view
587 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Project report- Impact of Supply Management on Project Management-PPP Projects
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Kunal Delwadia
Project Management
Professor Harsha Kestur, RIMSR
27th February 2014
Impact of Technical Supply Chain Aspects on Overall Project Management – RMSIR
In the present economic condition infrastructure facilities in India behaves as a critical bottleneck and its
way of durable step taken to revive economic growth on track. While many country was focusing on
developing physical infrastructure successfully through private participation or through public- private
partnership. However in India, Private sector had very uninspired response and tiny steps were taken by
government to promote PPP model through policy framework or without any incentives. This draft
consist of three aspects specifically the role of a Project Leader and Procurement Head with respect to
inadequate transparency of procedures, inappropriate risk allocation, improper project approvals, cost and
time overruns, overlapping of regulatory and lack of good governance. How can we implement and
execute PPP model successfully? In my learning process, Project Management will help me to enhance
growth.
Three successful projects in India with Public- Private Partnership (PPP Model)
1. GMR Infrastructure Ltd- Airport Authority of India, Indira Gandhi International Airport.
Delhi Development Authority granted Indira Gandhi International Airport to operate, manage and
develop for 30 years. The project concession can be extended by another 30 years on mutual interest of
both the stakeholders. The partnership was constituted with 50.1% stake of GMR; Airport Authority of
India and other stakeholders constitutes of Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL). DIAL is a
consortium of the GMR Group (50.1%), Fra port (10%) and Malaysia Airports (10%), India Development
Fund (3.9%) and the Airports Authority of India retains a 26% stake.
GIL led consortium began its operation in May 2006. A major expansion plan, entailing an expenditure of
Rs.86 Billion, is to be implemented during FY-08-10E to increase annual capacity of the airport to 37
million passengers from 18 million in 2006.
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
Stakeholder of Delhi International Airport Ltd
1. GMR (50.1%)
2. Fra Port (10%)
3. Malaysia Airport (10%)
4. Indian Development fund (3.9%)
5. Airport Authority Of India (26%)
6. Passengers from India and abroad
7. Various Airlines
8. Transport service provider etc.
Key Success factors of DIAL
1. Constant focus on risk mitigation
2. GMR demonstrated ability to overcome regulatory hurdles and secure favorable terms
3. Capital Structure for Project finance.
4. Strategic Partnership with leading operators.
5. Identified Growth Potential with multiple growth levels
a. Leveraged at parental level
b. Re leveraging Project Assets
c. Securitization
d. Keep cash flows in mind not profitability
e. Adjusted tax structure
f. Analysis of Project opportunities, operating scenarios and assessment to key assumptions
2. Tata Power- Delhi Government (Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd)
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd commenced their operations from July 2002 through PPP Model
framework as a 51:49 joint venture between Tata Power and Government of Delhi. When Tata Power
entered into joint venture with Delhi Government, there were problems in supply front, huge backlog of
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur new connections and billing payment complaints, poor infrastructure support, workforce, which was
anxious and has a sense of disillusionment with the post privatization scenario. The task for the
management was to take initiatives that deliver results quickly. This would help improve the ground
situation and instill confidence in the stakeholders that promise the reform process holds would be
implemented at the ground level. Nine years since inception of this public-private partnership has
produced excellent results, which include:
Unprecedented AT&C Loss Reduction: AT& C losses were approximately reduced to 40% since take
over in July 2002 from opening loss level of 53% down to 13.2% at present
Significant improvement in power supply reliability: Power Supply situation in Delhi government held
power station has improved significantly over years owing to intensive investment in the network,
stringent maintenance practice, innovative reengineered, deployed systems and processes that offer
consumer convenience and ensure consumer expectation are met with high degree of repetitive,
consistency and efficiency. The success story of Tata Power Delhi Distribution is gaining recognition,
which becomes a model for further replication.
Stake Holders
1. The Government
2. The Customer
3. The Employees
4. Tata Power
3. Yamuna Express Highway, UP Government- Jaypee Group: SPV: Jaypee Infratech Ltd
The Yamuna Expressway Project was the dedicated project of Government of Uttar Pradesh; it was
started in 2001 to promote tourism, industrialization and urban development in surrounding areas. The
main objective was to have better connectivity with National Capital, Delhi, to attract tourist and promote
tourism of India’s most precious monument “TAJ MAHAL”. For this purpose special purpose vehicle
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Jaypee Infratech Ltd was constituted for implementation, operating and maintaining 165 km long 6 lanes
accessed controlled Yamuna Express highway in the state of Uttar Pradesh connecting Noida and Agra.
Stake Holders
1. Government of Uttar Pradesh
2. Jaypee Group
3. Customers
4. Employees
4. Gujarat Pipvav Port: Joint Venture GPPL- PRCL
Gujarat Pipvav port limited, India’s first private port company was commissioned in 1996. Port
connectivity hampered cargo growth at Pipvav port. Therefore, the joint venture formed with Ministry of
railway, Pipvav Rail Corporation to overcome this problem, Ministry of railways undertook the task of
converting the existing 250 km meter gauge into broad gauge between Surendra nagar and Rajula and
extending the line from Rajula city to the port. At the same time, a 30,000 sq meter rail container terminal
was developed. The rail project was completed in April 2003, and the terminal became operational in
November 2003. There has been a dramatic increase in container throughput since 2004.
Stake Holders
1. Gujarat Pipvav Port limited
2. Ministry of railways
3. Customers
4. Excise and transportation company
Role of Project head and Procurement Head
1. Careful planning of project and carefully analysing time span of individual task.
a. Strong emphasis should be put on forecasting revenue and cost as a part of the feasibility
study. Over estimation of revenue can bankrupt the concession.
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
2. Portfolio of projects if necessary to complete simultaneously finish the supporting project.
3. Control the project portfolio early detection through dashboards.
4. Resource contention and priority of task.
5. Keep an eye on project from start, deliver project at 95% on time and within budget.
6. Resource planning, budget tracking.
a. Value of competitive procurement – uncompetitive gives a strong position to negotiating
private party and can lead to excessive cost to government.
7. Reconcile project budget.
8. Level of risk associated with a project schedule, planning and execution.
a. Asses willingness to pay and prepare communication plan- widespread public opposition
can prematurely end the concession. The absence of an assessment of willingness to pay
can lead to dissatisfaction, and violent protests.
b. An external macro economic shock can create an un expected situation for government
whereby it can not comply with its contractual duties.
9. Leverage available resources in order to maximize the throughput of the project.
a. Strong institutional arrangement- institutional arrangement should ensure co-ordination
technical support that checks and balances are appropriately applied.
10. Legal framework
a. Comply with contractual agreement, financial profitability and sustainability is heavily
depends on government respect of contractual agreements.
b. A solid legal framework for PPP is needed to specify the “rules of the game” for the
private sector and reduce the project risk, thus improving the success rate of PPP projects
Importance of this live project in my career growth
I pursued my Bachelor’s of Technology in Instrumentation and Control Engineering from National
Institute of Technology, Tiruchirapalli, Tamilnadu, India. After completing my Bachelor’s of Technology
I had work experience in the field of Project Execution/ commissioning and installation in India’s largest
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur steel making company at single location, JSW Steel Ltd. To enhance my technical knowledge, I pursued
Masters Of Engineering in Power Systems from University of Western Australia, Perth in 2010-2012.
Thereafter, I started my own venture named Red Cherry Multi commodity Pvt Ltd, an export firm, to
work with farmer to provide seasonal agriculture products to western world. I worked almost one and half
year in my startup and realized that I need to get exposure in management. Therefor, currently, I am
studying my Masters Of Business Administration (PGDM) from Indian Institute Of Management
Kashipur. Moreover, learning is important at every stage of life, it always increases as it moves. Hence I
would like to make constant effort to become a successful manager, and an entrepreneur. From my
perspective Project Management course would help me to build and to grow my business in future. I want
to enhance the learning opportunity provided by RIMSR. It will be good learning experience as well as
saving of time, so that I can use and apply this knowledge in real life situation, more specifically in my
own business set up.
Project Plan
In this segment, we examine the customary parts of distinctive foundations included in overseeing
specific parts of the store network. This segment serves as a forerunner to the advancement of a system
that exhibits how PPPs in supply chains can organize open and private performers in chain-level
2/25/14 3/2/14 3/7/14 3/12/14 3/17/14 3/22/14 3/27/14
PPP Projects Literature studies
Emprical Studies
Power Projects
Road Projects
Port Projects
Airport Projects
Build Survey
Post Survey
Contact industry Professional
Analysis (AHP)
start Date
Duration
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur mediations for destitution lightening, given that the business disappointments and tests exhibited in HVA
supply chains may oblige a more integrative methodology.
The many-sided quality of supply chains intimates that there are numerous conceivable passage focuses
for both open and private intercession. As a purpose of union and further elaboration, it is suitable to
depict the exercises embraced in an inventory network all the more thoroughly and expressly with a
specific end goal to comprehend and characterize the potential parts for open and private establishments.
Our beginning stage is the production network model of Cooper, Lambert, and Pagh (1997), which
highlights the systems of exercises and procedures in the inventory network. Every performing artist in
the production network will do various distinctive inner exercises (of differing degrees of vitality,
contingent upon the performer), including generation, buy of inputs, logistics, showcasing and deals,
monetary administration, and innovative work. Along the production network itself, there will likewise
exist various paramount techniques that supply each one company's exercises and incorporate on-screen
characters along the production network. These techniques incorporate overseeing client connections and
interest, satisfying requests, securing materials, and participating in chain-level innovative work (R&d)
and advertising. Figure 2 outlines this model in an outline and shows how production network procedures
join diverse members in the store network, while uncovering the fundamental interior capabilities
attempted at the firm level.
We adapt this framework to identify the activities and processes that play a predominant role in HVA
supply chains in developing countries. We maintain the internal activities: production, input purchases,
logistics, marketing, credit, and technological development. Key processes that support these internal
activities include extension services (related to product development and commercialization),
infrastructure development (such as storage facilities, related to issues of manufacturing flow
management), information systems (a kin to order fulfillment and demand management), and
certification, grades, and standards (related to demand management and customer service management).
An additional process not explicitly is the organizational mechanisms that coordinate supply chain actors
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur at key points in the supply chain and provide information about supply chain specifications, such as
contracts and other forms of vertical and horizontal coordination.
Supply chain
activity
Traditional Needed Roles
for SCM
Market Failure Possible entry
points in PPP Public sector Private Sector
Production Input and
Output price
policies;
regulation of
competition
Generic
commodity and
final product
production
Production of
high value
specialized
commodities
and goods that
meet rigid
customer
specifications
Production
scale, limited
technical skills
in new
techniques, low
income.
Link public
services and
goods with
private sector.
Commodity
like power,
infrastructure,
cold storage for
agriculture.
Input
Procurement
Input and
output price
policies,
regulation of
competition
Purchase of
inputs for
production
Use of high
quality inputs
that meet
customer
specification
for end
products
High taxes/
subsidies lack
of credit access
for inputs
Creation of
producer
organization to
procure high
quality inputs
in bulk to
reduce costs.
Logistics Distribution
network
Specialized
logistics
function to
Cost reduction
activities to
reduce
Poor
infrastructure,
crowding out
Development
of partnership
of link
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
manage
Distribution
activities
transaction cost
in distribution
by public
sector, low
market access
for remote
areas
distribution
activities in
remote areas.
Marketing Public
certification
and promotion
of projects in
media and print
media. Spread
awareness
about the
collaboration
for inclusive
growth
opportunity for
public and
private sector
companies.
Development
of brands and
labels as SPV,
commodity
promotions and
retail activities
for
procurement of
the project.
Coordination
of production
system to
institutionalize
product
differentiation
and market
segment
branding
strategies for
adding value
Limited small
holders
capacity in
formal
marketing and
branding
strategies;
limited small
holder capacity
to meet
specifications
of brand
Use of
producer
organization to
establish
marketing
partnership
with processor
and retailers to
promote
innovative or
socially
beneficial
products and
create brands.
Credit Public sector
banks and
credit facility
at competitive
Private sector
bank, macro
finance
activities
Access to
credit to
purchase high
quality inputs
and finance to
Limit high
transaction
costs
In conjunction
with
underwriting
by public and
private sector
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
interest rate promote PPP
projects
lenders.
Research and
Development
Public R&D
input price
policy
Private R&D
for inputs and
variety of
projects
Development
of technologies
to raise
productivity of
high demand
projects
Private
profitability of
varieties with
social benefits
may be low or
negative
Research
partnerships to
develop
socially
beneficial input
to production
Learning
1. Strict governance arrangements are essential across all the tied supply chain.
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
2. Ensure alignment of public and private objectives.
3. Necessity of benchmarking costs to assess future value for money.
4. Selecting the right contractual model.
5. Verify and validate bid assumptions.
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
Project Management
For PPP preparations –
As for other large infrastructure projects – work streams are interconnected and interdependent in
so many ways; yet sometimes operate independently, as if in silos. The government project promoters
must take proactive steps to prevent that isolation and keep the work streams coordinated and aligned
through rigorous project management; otherwise, the inter linkages could cause problems that become
apparent only during procurement. And at that point, the promoters will have to backtrack to deal with the
issues, and the project could be delayed.
Establish an “activist” PMO to plan, coordinate and monitor the PPP preparation process. The PMO
should take an energetic and diligent role in driving the preparation process. Its list of duties includes the
following:
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Planning
– Define, align and articulate the top-level strategic objectives that the project is intended to address.
Select metrics that enable the measurement of project success.
– Initiate a staged feasibility study with gateway reviews, ideally following a standardized approach that
is used for all projects, as in the United Kingdom. Define clear criteria, required information and
decisions to be made to proceed through each stage gate (for example, the preparation of best practices in
this report could be used as checklist). Continuously and vigorously look for a “NO” at multiple possible
exit ramps because exiting at the earliest possible stage conserves funds, avoids the planning fallacy and
adds credibility to projects that move forward.
– Define required deliverables and timelines for the overall feasibility study and each workstream and
support the teams in drawing up their action plan and in detailing the tasks, milestones, accountabilities
and risks.
Coordinating
– Keep in contact with political leaders and high-level technocrats to maintain their support.
– Enable communication among the teams, and between them and the steering committee.
– Ensure the accountability of each work stream manager while enabling the exchange of functional
expertise within a project and across projects.
– Identify interdependencies between work streams; note, for example, the need for aligned assumptions.
Monitoring
– Check that progress conforms to the project plan, and evaluate work stream outputs against best
practices and country- and sector-specific PPP guidance. – Submit regular reports to the steering
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur committee and stakeholders, customized to their information needs. – Identify, evaluate and track
emerging risks and issues proactively and continuously – and bring them to the attention of the steering
committee; develop risk-mitigation strategies, and institute a pre-defined issue-resolution process for
different scenarios.
– Track and assure the continued validity of underlying assumptions.
– Encourage work teams to raise concerns and warning signals early by fostering a culture of
transparency and assigning accountabilities for risks to individuals.
Responses from the corporate Professionals
Age in Years
Gender
Education
Up to 25 2 6% 25-29 9 28% 30-39 4 13% 40-49 6 19% 50 and above 11 34%
Male 28 88%
Female 4 13%
Technical qualification 1 3%
Under Graduate 2 6%
Graduate 10
31%
MBA/Post Graduation/Ph.D
19
59%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
Project Manager [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
Project Head [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
Procurement Manager [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
Procurement Head [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
Project Finance Manager [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
1-3 Years 17
61%
4-7 Years 6 21%
7-10 years 3 11%
10 years and Above 2 7%
1-3 Years 7 30%
4-7 Years 8 35%
7-10 years 5 22%
10 years and Above 3 13%
1-3 Years 9 60%
4-7 Years 2 13%
7-10 years 3 20%
10 years and Above 1 7%
1-3 Years 6 43% 4-7 Years 2 14% 7-10 years 2 14% 10 years and Above 4 29%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
Project Finance Head [Experience (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)]
Current Role, Industry (Project Management, Project Execution, Project Commissioning, etc..)
Project Manager 4 7% Project Head 12 20% Power 8 13% Infrastructure 9 15% Petroleum 7 12% Automobile 3 5% Manufacturing 10 17% Heavy Industry 3 5% Pharmaceutical 4 7%
1-3 Years 7 64%
4-7 Years 3 27%
7-10 years 0 0%
10 years and Above 1 9%
1-3 Years 6 43%
4-7 Years 0 0%
7-10 years 1 7%
10 years and Above 7 50%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Types of project (PPP - Public Private Partnership) you have worked on?
What Supply Chain/Procurement risks or concerns are most likely to negatively impact your organization?
In your opinion, which of the following supply chain/ procurement solutions would have the greatest impact in minimizing risk to your organization?
Replacement Project 8 15%
Expansion Project 12
23%
Mordenisation 16
31%
New Business - Related line 6 12%
New business - New Line 9 17%
Other 1 2%
Supply interruption risk 18 36% Lack of an effective senior executive led sales and operation planning (S&OP) process
14 28%
Lack of timely and accurate information and spend analysis capacity for strategic sourcing.
18 36%
Other 0 0%
An integrated and supported supply chain and/or procurement strategic plan
18 36%
A formal and effective enterprise wide supply chain risk management process
17 34%
An effective corporate wide strategic sourcing process
15 30%
Other 0 0%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Which of the following solutions, if any, are currently key business priorities within your organization?
An integrated and supported supply chain and/or procurement strategic plan
16 33%
An effective corporate wide strategic sourcing process
16 33%
Effective supplier management and contracts management and control capabilities
17 35%
Other 0 0%
How does your organisation manage sustainable Supply Chain issues? Forecasting Contracts & Materials department has to make it sure that indenters request raised are complied on time and other products that need to be purchased regularly are managed well in inventory and procured before the reserve stock end ERP Tools are only supportive engines. Process and flow are critical. While defining the flow ensure it is simple and awareness across the organization on the supply chain flow is available so that defined process will stay on. a) SAP R/3 & SRM for Procurement & Accounting b) Standard Inventory management techniques. c) Reduction of redundant actions, reduction in lead time, clean audit trail, information sharing across locations d) resistance to adapt new system, parallel legacy activities for legal requirements Business opportunity/problem definition [Project Management tools and Technique]
N/A 12 38% 0 (Not Improved ) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 5 16% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 1 3% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Needs/requirement analysis [Project Management tools and Technique]
Concurrent engineering [Project Management tools and Technique]
Stakeholder analysis [Project Management tools and Technique]
Assigned project sponsor [Project Management tools and Technique]
N/A 6 19% 0 (Not Improved) 9 28% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 8 25% 2 (Limited Improvement) 2 6% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
0 0%
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved) 6 19% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 9 28% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 4 13% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 4 13% 0 (Not Improved ) 7 22% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 10 31% 2 (Limited Improvement) 9 28% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 1 3% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
N/A 5 16% 0 (Not Improved ) 8 25% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 5 16% 2 (Limited Improvement) 7 22% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 6 19% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Gantt chart [Project Management tools and Technique]
Network diagram [Project Management tools and Technique]
Probabilistic duration estimate (PERT Analysis) [Project Management tools and Technique]
N/A 3 9% 0 (Not Improved ) 6 19% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 10 31% 2 (Limited Improvement) 4 13% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 5 16% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
4 13%
N/A 4 13% 0 (Not Improved ) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 9 28% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 4 13% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
2 6%
N/A 5 16% 0 (Not Improved ) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 10 31% 2 (Limited Improvement) 5 16% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 2 6% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
6 19%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Critical path method & analysis [Project Management tools and Technique]
Critical chain method & analysis [Project Management tools and Technique]
Progress report [Project Management tools and Technique]
Electronic timesheet [Project Management tools and Technique]
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved ) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 12 38% 2 (Limited Improvement) 7 22% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 3 9% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved ) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 10 31% 2 (Limited Improvement) 7 22% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 6 19% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
2 6%
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved) 2 6% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 8 25% 2 (Limited Improvement) 9 28% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 6 19% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
5 16%
N/A 3 9% 0 (Not Improved ) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 8 25% 2 (Limited Improvement) 9 28% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 4 13% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
4 13%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Value analysis [Project Management tools and Technique ]
Monitoring critical success factors [Project Management tools and Technique ]
Bid/seller evaluation [Project Management tools and Technique ]
Financial business benefits/risk metrics/ [Project Management tools and Technique]
N/A 1 3% 0 (Not Improved ) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 7 22% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 8 25% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved) 2 6% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 5 16% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
4 13%
N/A 2 6% 0 (Not Improved ) 3 9% 1 (Very Limited Improvement)
8 25%
2 (Limited Improvement) 6 19% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 10 31% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 3 9% 0 (Not Improved ) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 3 9% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 8 25% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
6 19%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Task Scheduling [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Resource Scheduling [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Resource Optimization [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Multiple Item/Project Scheduling [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
N/A 5 16% 0 (No Improvement) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 11 34% 2 (Limited Improvement) 5 16% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 4 13% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
2 6%
N/A 3 9% 0 (No Improvement) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 9 28% 2 (Limited Improvement) 7 22% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 5 16% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 9 28% 2 (Limited Improvement) 9 28% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 6 19% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
N/A 1 3% 0 (No Improvement) 3 9% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 9 28% 2 (Limited Improvement) 13 41% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 5 16% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Multiple Project Resource Management [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Cost Monitoring [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management ]
Portfolio Analysis (Project/Resource/Material) [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management ]
ERP [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management ]
N/A 1 3% 0 (No Improvement) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 2 6% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 12 38% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
1 3%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 3 9% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 2 6% 2 (Limited Improvement) 13 41% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 8 25% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
4 13%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 2 6% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 7 22% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 9 28% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
4 13%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 6 19% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 5 16% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
6 19%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Cost Estimating [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Scenario Analysis [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Lean Operations [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Lead Time Analysis [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
N/A 1 3% 0 (No Improvement) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 7 22% 2 (Limited Improvement) 10 31% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 10 31% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 6 19% 2 (Limited Improvement) 11 34% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 9 28% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 4 13% 0 (No Improvement) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 6 19% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
2 6%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 1 3% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 5 16% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
5 16%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Inventory Optimisation [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management ]
Route Optimization (Logistics) [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management ]
Forecasting (Sharing Info.with stakeholders) [Improvement by use of IT tools and Technique in SCM & Project Management]
Procurement [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
N/A 1 3% 0 (No Improvement) 3 9% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 5 16% 2 (Limited Improvement) 8 25% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 9 28% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
6 19%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 6 19% 2 (Limited Improvement) 6 19% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 11 34% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
N/A 2 6% 0 (No Improvement) 4 13% 1 (Very Limited Improvement) 4 13% 2 (Limited Improvement) 12 38% 3 (Extensive Improvement) 7 22% 4 (Very Extensive Improvement)
3 9%
Low 7 22% Moderate 16 50% High 9 28%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur
Strategic Sourcing [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Lean Six Sigma Implementation [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management ]
Inventory Management [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management ]
Warehouse Management [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Logistics Route Optimization [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Low 1 3% Moderate 17 53% High 14 44%
Low 5 16% Moderate 19 59% High 8 25%
Low 1 3% Moderate 18 56% High 13 41%
Low 7 22% Moderate 16 50% High 9 28%
Low 4 13% Moderate 19 59% High 9 28%
Kunal Delwadia IIM Kashipur Political Risk Managers [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Leadership/People Management [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Technology + MBA (Supply Chain/Operations) [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Operations Accounting/Finance/Strategy [Professional skill set requirement for improving supply chain in over all project management]
Low 6 19% Moderate 18 56% High 8 25%
Low 7 22% Moderate 11 34% High 14 44%
Low 4 13% Moderate 15 47% High 13 41%
Low 3 9% Moderate 23 72% High 6 19%