Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
-
Upload
amayeta-johnson -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 1
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Report from ITU-R TG1/8 meeting, Boston, 8-18 June 2004]Date Submitted: [7 July, 2004]Source: [Kazimierz “Kai” Siwiak] Company [on behalf of Pulse~LINK]Address [1969 Kellogg Ave., Carlsbad, CA, USA]Voice:[+1-954-937-3288], FAX: [--], E-Mail:[[email protected]]
Re: [ITU-R TG1/8]
Abstract: [ITU-R TG1/8 held their Third Meeting on UWB in Boston on 8-18 June, 2004. This document presents results of that meeting and UWB Exhibition from the perspective of the United States Delegation.]
Purpose: [This material is intended to inform P802.15 about the status of ITU-R TG1/8 “On the compatibility between ultra-wideband devices (UWB) and radio-communications services,” to report on the UWB Exhibition, and to recommend that the IEEE individuals consider presenting contributions to the ITU through State and Sector Members. The ITU and USTG 1/8 are seeking technical contributions which show the compatibility of UWB with existing services.]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 2
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Report from ITU-R TG1/8 Meeting and UWB Exhibition, Boston, 8-18 June 2004
“Coexistence of UWB with other Wireless Services”
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 3
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland
• Established 17 May 1865 in Paris by the 20 founding members • Became UN specialized agency 15 October 1947 “where
governments and the private sector coordinate global telecommunication networks and services”
• Leading publisher of telecommunication technology, regulatory and standards information
ITU-R (Radiocommunications) Mission• To ensure rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of
the radiofrequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including those using satellite orbit
• Carry out studies and adopt recommendations on radiocommunication matters
About ITU and ITU-RAbout ITU and ITU-R
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 4
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Third Meeting of ITU-R TG 1/8 andUWB Exhibition, Boston, MA
• TG 1/8 met over a 10 day span• Vendors exhibited UWB-related wares:
– Aether Wire showed static displays of DS-UWB locator devices– Agilent showed array of test equipment displaying MB-OFDM signals– Elanix showed an array of system simulation toolboxes capable of simulating DS-
UWB, MB-OFDM and suitable for CSM– Freescale/Motorola demonstrated wireless DS-UWB piconet transferring an HDTV
channel– Pulse~LINK demonstrated large array of operating impulse UWB demos:
• UWB over CATV in presence of TV channels: 1 UWB HDTV signal• Wireless UWB: two HDTV channels, one in each direction, transmitted and received• One UWB HDTV signal over local powerline
– SARA (Short-range Automotive Radar Allocation) demonstrated several 22-29 GHz band UWB radars operating in automobiles
– Staccato showed MB-OFDM transmitter (only) cabled into test equipment– Wisair showed MB-OFDM transmitter (only) cabled into test equipment
• A rich abundance and variety of UWB technologies were demonstrated to a world-wide audience of ITU-R delegates
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 5
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
“The ITU-R TG 1/8 meeting in Boston was a huge success in regard to the global adoption of UWB. The Delegates saw firsthand and many for the first time, the successes we've achieved in the development of UWB. This came at a critical juncture as many administrations have or will shortly begin their rule making processes. These delegates were genuinely impressed by what they experienced and will no doubt evangelize our message to the masses. It should also be noted that the IEEE's involvement in this process as a Sector member of the ITU-R speaks volumes to their commitment to reach beyond the U.S. borders and recognizes that any standard accepted here must also have a universal appeal in order to be adopted worldwide.”
– G. Smith Anderson, CEO Uraxs Host ITU-R TG 1/8 Boston
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 6
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
ITU-R TG 1/8 (UWB) MeetingsBoston, MA
• TG 1/8: “On the compatibility between ultra-wideband devices (UWB) and radio-communications services”
• TG 1/8 comprises four Working Groups tasked with generating Report and Recommendations on UWB– WG1 – UWB Characteristics– WG2 – UWB Compatibility (broken into 14 subgroups) – WG3 – Spectrum Management Framework– WG4 – Measurement Techniques
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 7
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
WG 2 Drafting Groups
Mainbody PDNR DG 2-9 Report Chapter
1 Background DG 2-8 1.1 Introduction 1.2 UWB applications 1.3 UWB mitigation
techniques for compatibility
2 Characteristics, methodologies, scenarios
DG 2-8
3 Individual studies 4 Aggregate Interference
Analysis DG 2-8
mini-glossary:
DG – drafting groupEESS – Earth exploration serviceFS – Fixed serviceFSS – Fixed satellite serviceMS – Mobile serviceMSS – Mobile satellite service PDNR – preliminary draft new recommendationRAS – Radio astronomy serviceRNSS – Radionavigation satellite systemSG – study groupTG – task groupWG – working groupWP – working party
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 8
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
WG 2: more detail
Report Chapter
ITU SG, WP
Radio Service Drafting Group
3.1 7C EESS DG 2-1 3.2 7D RAS DG 2-2 3.3 SG9, 9A,
9B, 9D FS DG 2-3
3.4 SG8 MS 3.4.1 8A Land Mobile DG 2-4-1 3.4.2 8B Aeronautical, Maritime and
Radiodetermination Services DG 2-4-2
3.4.2.1 8B Maritime mobile service 3.4.2.2 8B Aeronautical service 3.4.2.3 8B Radiodetermination 3.4.3 MS
3.4.3.1 8D Mobile satellite DG 2-4-3 3.4.3.2 8D RNSS DG 2-4-6 3.4.4 8F IMT 2000 DG 2-4-4 3.4.5 8A-9B Wireless Access DG 2-4-5 3.4.6 8D RNSS DG 2-4-6
3.4.6.1 8D GPS 3.4.6.2 8D Galileo 3.4.6.3 8D GLONASS
3.5 SG 6 Broadcasting 3.5.1 6E Terrestrial Broadcasting DG 2-5-1 3.5.2 6S Satellite Broadcasting DG 2-5-2 3.6 8A Amateur Service DG 2-6 3.7 SG 4 FSS DG 2-7
mini-glossary:
DG – drafting groupEESS – Earth exploration serviceFS – Fixed serviceFSS – Fixed satellite serviceMS – Mobile serviceMSS – Mobile satellite service PDNR – preliminary draft new recommendationRAS – Radio astronomy serviceRNSS – Radionavigation satellite systemSG – study groupTG – task groupWG – working groupWP – working party
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 9
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
The ITU-R process
• Documents are contributed to ITU-R in Geneva by ITU-R Members
• Assigned to the 4 Working Groups (WG)• “TEMP” documents created by WGs
– Considered by Chairman and group– Edited and included in the Chairman’s Report
• Become Basis for “Report” and then “Recommendations”
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 10
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
The ITU-R Contributions
• Documents are contributed to ITU-R– From the 189 State Delegations (like USTG 1/8)
• US input papers must conform to US position • Vetted by FCC / NTIA / State Department / White House
– From the 640+ Sector Members and 90 Associates• Corporations (... Motorola, TI, ... )• IEEE (Regional International Organization)
• Documents then assigned to Working Groups• “TEMP” docs generated and presented for
inclusion in the Chairman’s Report of the Meeting
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 11
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
The ITU-R Process in Boston
• Approximately 104 contribution papers were considered
• Meeting spanned 10 days: 9-18 June 2004• More than 53 “TEMP” docs created, edited and
included in Chairman’s Report• At least 2 more meetings deemed necessary for
completion of the “Draft Report” by November 2005• Perhaps 2 additional meetings before
“Recommendations” generated (end of 2006)• [See also: IEEE 802.15-04/340r0 for more details]
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 12
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Sample “Issue” from a Drafting Group: RAS
dBm/MHz
0.1 1 10 100 1,000 104 105
-150
-100
-50
0
-174 dBm/Hz
-75 dBm/MHz
Frequency, GHz
“Black Body” radiation: one human being, relative to ambient
Proposed CEPT / ETSI UWB mask
US FCC “handheld” rules
“Calculation of the maximum tolerable e.i.r.p. per UWB device at 1 per km2 ” [from: DG2-2_chapter3.2_RAS_rev1.doc Table QQ]
mini-glossary:
RAS – Radio astronomy service
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 13
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Source 1-8/111, 1-8/126, USTG 18-53
Task Group 1/8 DG 2-8 of Working Group
[PROPAGATION PREDICTION METHODS FOR UWB COMPATIBILITY STUDIES
The following text is proposed for insertion as shown below, based on the contents of documents 1-8/111, 1-8/126, and USTG 18-53.
Introduction
By the last meeting of ITU-R TG 1/8, October 2003, it was decided to update and further develop the chapters on UWB propagation of the PDNR ITU-R SM.[UWB.COMP] and of the Report on compatibility studies. Liaison statements were sent to WP 3K and WP 3M in Documents 3K/12, 3M/21 requesting information on appropriate propagation models for ultra-wideband emissions that are needed for compatibility assessment with radiocommunication services. By considering the Liaison statement sent back by WP 3K to TG 1/8 in Document 1-8/60 including the attachment 3K/30 and remarks sent by some authors of the different UWB propagation studies described in A1.2.1.4 of Annex 2 to Document 1-8/59 (UWB path loss models) the chapter A1.2.1.4 of the PDNR ITU-R SM.[UWB.COMP] and the chapter 4.1 of the Report on compatibility studies can therefore be updated. In the following, the new versions of these two chapters are presented.
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
NOT PRINTED Document 1-8/TEMP/80-E 16 June 2004
RADIOCOMMUNICATION STUDY GROUPS
English only
“[ .. ]” everything in square brackets is still under review and subject to revision
Input source material, from “Member” contributions
After presentation and debate by heads of delegations, with inputs from delegates, TEMP is created as an input to the “Chairman’s Report”
“TEMP” Generation
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 14
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Sample Excerpts from a “TEMP”: FSS
... ... Document 1-8/107 (UK/Inmarsat)
“Revision of Studies of the Compatibility Analysis between GSO MSS Systems and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Systems” ... ...
The following provisional conclusions can be drawn ... in the downlink direction:
Separation distances
– ... separation distances of 10 km are required from peak power UWB emissions ...
Maximum permissible EIRP density in 1 MHz bandwidth at 10 m distance
– The maximum permissible EIRP density varies from –62.25 dBm/MHz to –47.54 dBm/MHz from non-dithered average emissions with different PRFs.
– The maximum permissible EIRP density varies from –116.6 dBm/MHz to –47.54 dBm/MHz from non-dithered peak emissions with different PRFs.
– The maximum permissible EIRP density varies from –116.6 dBm/MHz to –63.56 dBm/MHz from dithered emissions with different PRFs .
“LIAISON STATEMENT TO WORKING PARTY 4A COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) AND FSS SYSTEMS”
2.6 dB below kTB
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 15
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
ITU-R Recommendations
• Chairman’s Report basis for “Report” and “PDNR”• “Recommendations” (PDNR) are the key document• PDNR to be the basis for implementation of UWB
regulations by individual Nations• US Position: Don’t want “Recommendations” to
result in any restrictions of existing US rules on UWB
mini-glossary:
PDNR – preliminary draft new recommendation
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 16
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
IEEE Role in ITU
• IEEE is “Regional International Member” in ITU-R (Radiocommunications Sector)– IEEE can contribute documents directly to ITU-R (but with lots of bylaw
and bureaucratic obstacles)– Another route for IEEE wireless standards to enter the international
community
• IEEE also works closely with the ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)– IEEE recognized in 2000 by ITU-T as an international organization
whose work is referenced in ITU-T Recommendations following procedures developed by ITU-T
• IEEE802 individuals can work through their State or Sector
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 17
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
IEEE UWB Opportunity in ITU-R
• ITU and USTG 1/8 are seeking technical contributions which show the compatibility of UWB with existing services
• IEEE is “Regional International Member” of ITU-R, can directly contribute to TG 1/8 meetings (bylaws govern how IEEE can act)
• IEEE, as “RIM”, can use own criteria for compatibility• IEEE802 individuals should seek out State and
Sector Members as routes for contributions
July 2004
K. Siwiak, for Pulse~LINKSlide 18
doc: IEEE802.15-04/0316r1
Submission
Resources and Information
• Boston Organizer, Uraxs Communications: http://uraxs.com/ITU-R_Boston_2004/TG_1-8_Boston.htm
• Signature Sponsor: Pulse~LINK http://pulselink.net
• ITU: http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg1/rtg1-8/index.asp
• US Task Group 1/8 on UWB: http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/TG-18/
• IEEE: http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/pr_itumem.html