8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

1/48

Assignment 4by Thoai Tran Gia

WORD COUNT 11456

CHARACTER COUNT 68244

TIME SUBMITTED 06-JAN-2014 09:46PM

PAPER ID 386608752

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

2/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

3/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

4/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

5/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

6/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

7/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

8/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

9/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

10/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

11/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

12/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

13/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

14/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

15/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

16/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

17/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

18/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

19/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

20/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

21/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

22/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

23/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

24/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

25/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

26/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

27/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

28/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

29/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

30/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

31/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

32/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

33/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

34/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

35/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

36/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

37/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

38/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

39/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

40/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

41/48

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

42/48

FINAL GRADE

30 /40 Assignment 4

GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor This is a comprehensive plan that carefully identifieswhat quality means and how it will be managed. Thelinkage between the quality definition, the managementstrategy and the project is a strong point. Althoughquality strategy is clearly identifed, it is not well arguedusing the literature. Arguments do not draw fromrepected quality writers and issues are not based ondocumented problems. To make your plan stand up tocriticism and to justify resources needed for implementation, your ideas need to be backed up. Oneof the best ways to do this is by using the literature -show why procurement is important; show whydocument control is important - there is lots of goodliterature on this. Good ideas are not enough - you needto back them up.Dispite the weakness in rationale, I felt the report was of an excellent standard. The effort put into the qualitydefinitiion really paid off. Well done.

Submitted 1 day late. I've deducted 2 marks for being late.In a project situation miss ing a deadline without noticecan be catastrophic - especially when you are tendering.Make sure you hit your deadlines!

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

Comment 1 Good summary. Dont forget to include your recommendations.

Define your acronyms when you introduce them.

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

Comment 2 Good diagram.

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

43/48

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

Comment 3 Key issue for the quality plan.

PAGE 9

Comment 4 Excellent context section.

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

Comment 5 Good. Important that quality plan recognises this complex arrangement.

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14

PAGE 15

Comment 6 An excellent project overview and assumptions section. Great context and stakeholder sections.

PAGE 16

Comment 7 Important statement.

PAGE 17

PAGE 18

PAGE 19

Comment 8 Comprehensive quality definition. Remember time and cost are usually handled'naturally' by project processes, whereas your other dimensions tend to be handled poorly or in an adhoc manner. These areas need to be the focus . Great definition.

As there is a lot to think about, a summary form or diagram would make your definition easy tocommunicate - remember this as you will often be talking to groups and will need a 30 secondsummary.

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

44/48

PAGE 20

PAGE 21

PAGE 22

PAGE 23

PAGE 24

PAGE 25

PAGE 26

Comment 9 Good linkage of issue to strategy - it is clear how the potential issues will beaddressed.

Linkage to your quality definition is also excellent - I can see why the issues are quality issues!

Only improvement would be your rationale for the strategies - why will the strategies identified work?Perhaps this comes later.

PAGE 27

PAGE 28

Comment 10 Really good prescription of what is required, but need more reasoning as to why -use the literature!

PAGE 29

PAGE 30

Comment 11 Need to provide some evidence that document control is important. There are lots of great references for this.

PAGE 31

PAGE 32

PAGE 33

PAGE 34

Comment 12 This is also great, but where is the justification?

PAGE 35

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

45/48

PAGE 36

Comment 13 Why not include PDSA here?

PAGE 37

PAGE 38

PAGE 39

PAGE 40

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

46/48

RUBRIC: ASSESSMENT TASK 4

ASSUMPTIONS

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT(5)

QUAL. DEF.

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT(5)

APPLICATION

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(4)

GOOD(8)

EXCELLENT(10)

CONSISTENCY

32 / 4

5 /

Project ass umptions

Assumptions are ill considered, miss ing, and/or largely incomplete.

Somewhat considered, partially complete set of project assumptions. Aspects of projectexecution have not been thought through. Key aspects of project execution are missing.

Somewhat considered, complete set of project assumptions. Aspects of project executionhave not been thought through.

Well considered, complete set of project assumptions.

5 /

Quality Definition

Unclear definition that is not specific.

Definition is not specific. The definition uses the word 'quality'. No literature employed.

Definition is clear and well argued. Limited literature is employed and no quality framework isused.

Definition is clear, well argued and supported by the literature. Frameworks for qualitydefinition are employed.

4 / 10

Application of Quality Theory and Strategy

Few quality theories/strategies have been employed. Applications are incorrect or irrelevant.

Quality theories and strategies have been employed and applied, however most seemirrelevant or have been applied incorrectly.

Relevant quality theories and strategies have been employed and applied. Some may havebeen applied incorrectly.

Relevant quality theories and strategies have been employed and applied correctly.

5 /

Consistency with project ass umptions

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

47/48

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT(5)

ASSURANCE

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT(5)

INTEGRATION

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT

(5)

LITERATURE

UNSATISFACTORY(0)

SATISFACTORY(2)

Quality strategies seem disconnected from the project assumptions. Quality appears to bean 'add on'.

Some quality strategies are inconsistent with the overall project assumptions. Qualityappears to be an 'add on'.

Quality strategies are mainly consistent with the overall project assumptions. Quality ispartially integrated into the project.

Quality strategies are clearly consistent with the overall project assumptions. Quality is wellintegrated into the project.

4 /

Degree of assurance

There is little confidence that the project will deliver quality. Many risks have beenoverlooked.

A high quality plan is may be an outcome. A moderate number of quality 'risks' have notbeen addressed.

A high quality plan is likely to be an outcome. A small number of quality 'risks' have notbeen addressed.

It is clear that a high quality outcome will be achieved if the quality plan is implemented.

5 /

Report Integration

Report is disjointed. Presentation contains numerous errors.

Report is somewhat disjointed. Presentation contains numerous errors.

The report flows easily and key points are easy to find. Presentation reasonable, with minor mistakes.

The report flows easily and key points are easy to find. Presentation is clear and clean.

4 /

Literature References

Minimal us e of references from the literature (less than 5). Format not Harvard (RMIT).

References are documented in the bibliography. Citations and format partially use Harvardstyle (as per RMIT).

8/10/2019 Project Design for Quality_AT4 Group 3

48/48

GOOD(4)

EXCELLENT(5)

References are documented in the bibliography. Citations and format correctly use Harvardstyle (as per RMIT). References are a mix of qualities.

References are documented in the bibliography. Citations and format correctly use Harvardstyle (as per RMIT). References are of a high quality and demons trate throrough research.