Project Analysis Corporate Finance
-
Upload
asadhotshot -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Project Analysis Corporate Finance
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
1/21
Project Analysis
Session 5
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
2/21
Investment Process
STAGE 1: THE CAPITAL BUDGET
STAGE 2: PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS
PROBLEMS AND SOME SOLUTIONS
Ensuring that Forecasts Are Consistent
Eliminating Conflicts of Interest
Reducing Forecast Bias
Sorting the Wheat from the Chaff
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
3/21
Some What If Questions
Managers want to understand more than the NPV of a project.
If NPV is positive, they must seek to understand why suchan attractive project did not come from a competitor.
And if the firm goes ahead with the project, and other copy asuch a profitable idea, will the firm still have some
competitive advantage? They also want to predict what events could happen in an
uncertain environment they operate and how that might affectNPV.
Once they have done these predictions, management candecide if it is worthwhile investing more time and effort inunderstanding the uncertainty and trying to resolve it.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
4/21
Some What If Questions
Introduction There are four methods managers use to
handle project uncertainty:
Sensitivity Analysis Scenario Analysis
Simulation Analysis
Break-Even Analysis
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
5/21
Some What If Questions
Sensitivity Analysis
A sensitivity analysis calculates the consequencesof incorrectly estimating a variable in your NPVanalysis.
If forces you:
To identify the variables underlying your analysis.
To focus on how changes to these variablescould impact the expected NPV.
To consider what additional information shouldbe collected to resolve uncertainties about thevariables.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
6/21
Some What If
Questions
Finefodder is
considering openinga new superstore.
Cost of Capital 8%
NPV = 478,000
PV = $780,000 12-year annuity factor= $780,000 7.536 = $5.878 million
NPV = PVinvestment= $5.878 million$5.4 million = $478,000
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
7/21
Some What If Questions
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
8/21
Some What If Questions
Simulation Analysis A scenario analysis is helpful to see how interrelated
variables impact NPV. But one must run severalhundred possible scenarios.
A simulation analysis uses a computer to generatehundreds, or even thousands, of possible scenarios.
A probability distribution is assigned to eachcombination of variables to create an entire range ofpotential outcomes.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
9/21
Sensitivity Analysis v/s Scenario Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis v/s Scenario Analysis Both calculate how NPV depends on input assumptions
Sensitivity analysis changes inputs one at a time
Scenario analysis changes several variables at once
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
10/21
Break-Even Analysis
Accounting vs NPV Break-Even Analysis A Break-Even analysis shows the level of sales at
which a company breaks even.
An accounting break-even occurs where totalrevenues equal total costs (profits equal zero).
A NPV break-even occurs when the NPV of theproject equals zero.
Using accounting break-even can lead to poordecisions.
You can avoid this risk by using NPV break-evenin your analysis!
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
11/21
Break-Even Analysis
Accounting Break-Even You estimated salesto be $16 million.
Variable costswere 81.25% of sales ($0.8125of variable costs per $1 of sales).
Fixed costswere $2 million and depreciationwas $450,000.
Break-Even Revenues = Fixed Costs + Depreciation
Profit per $1 of Sales
= $2,000,000 + $450,000 = $2,450,000 = $13,066,667$1 - $0.8125 $0.1875
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
12/21
Break-Even Analysis
Accounting Break-Even Creating an income statement at $13,066,667 of
sales shows profit equals zero:
Revenues $13,066,667Variable Costs (81.25% of sales)10,616,667Fixed Costs + Depreciation 2,450,000Pretax Profit 0Taxes 0
Profit after Tax 0
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
13/21
Break-Even Analysis
Accounting Break-Even If a project breaks even in accounting terms
is it an acceptable investment?
Clue: This project has a 12 year life
Would you be happy with an investment
which after 12 years gave you a zerototal rate of return?
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
14/21
Break-Even Analysis
Accounting Break-Even A project which simply breaks even on an accounting
basis will always have a negative NPV!
Proof:
The initial investment is $5.4m. In each of the next 12 years, firm
receives a cashflow of $450,000. So firm gets its money back
Total operating cashflow= initial investment = 12*$450,000=$5.4m
But revenues are not suf f ic ient to repay the opportun i ty
cost o f that $5.4 mil l ion investm ent. NPV is negative.
Operating Cashflow = profit after tax + depreciation= $0 + $450,000 = $450,000
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
15/21
Break-Even Analysis
Note: Cash flow = Depreciation + After Tax Profit
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
16/21
Break-Even Analysis
NPV Break-EvenThis cash flow will last for 12 years. So to find its present value we multiplyby the 12-year annuity factor. With a discount rate of 8 percent, the presentvalue of $1 a year for each of 12 years is $7.536. Thus the present value ofthe cash flows is
PV (cash flows) = 7.536 (.1125 sales$1.02 million)
PV (cash flows) = investment7.536 (.1125 sales$1.02 million) = $5.4 million
$7.69 million + .8478 sales = $5.4 million
Sales = 5.4 + 7.69 / .8478
Sales = 15.4 million
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
17/21
Break-Even Analysis
NPV Break-Even Using the accounting break-even, the
project had to generate sales of $13.067million to have zero profit.
Using the NPV break-even, we find that theproject needs sales of $15.4 million to havea zero NPV. The project needs to be 18% more successful to break-even on
a NPV basis!
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
18/21
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
The Value of Having Options No matter how much analysis you do on a project, it isimpossible to completely eliminate uncertainty.
A firm must have the option: To mitigate the effect of unpleasant surprises and
to take advantage of pleasant ones? Because the future is uncertain, successful financial managers
seek to build flexibility into a project.
The perfect project would have:
The option to expand if things go well.
The option to bail out or switch production if things go poorly.
The option to postpone if future conditions might improve.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
19/21
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
The Value of Having Options
As a general rule, flexibility will be most valuableto you when the future is most uncertain.
The ability to change course as events developand new information becomes available is mostvaluable when it is hard to predict withconfidence what the best course of action will be.
Good outcomes can be exploited, while pooroutcomes can be avoided or postponed.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
20/21
Flexibility in Capital Budgeting
Decision treesare used to diagram theoptions in a project.
You can then determine the optimal courseof action from a series of potential options.
A decision tree is defined as a diagram ofsequential decisions and their possibleoutcomes.
-
8/13/2019 Project Analysis Corporate Finance
21/21
Example of Decision Tree
Donotstudy
Studyfinance
Squares represent decisions to be made.
Circles representreceipt of
information e.g. atest score.
The lines leading away
from the squaresrepresent thealternatives.
C
A
B
F
D