Progress in Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 0 50 100 ......Electrochemical Technologies...

1
Electrochemical Technologies Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Progress in Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Power Density Progress at LBNL Symmetric-Architecture at LBNL The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency Energy (ARPA-E), U.S. Department of Energy under work authorization number 13/CJ000/04/03. This work was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Emir Dogdibegovic, Ruofan Wang, and Michael C. Tucker Durability Thermal and Redox Cycling Current Collectors Welded on Cell air fuel Fabrication MS-SOFC Scalability 1. Tape casting and lamination of all cell layers in a single step 2. Co-sintered ceramic and stainless steel layers in reducing atmosphere (catalyst absent) 3. Catalyst introduced by infiltration (flexible catalyst compositions) POx fuel Excellent thermal shock/gradient tolerance Stable performance after multiple thermal cycles Advantages of symmetric-architecture MS-SOFCs 1. Extreme thermal cycling 2. Redox stable 3. Mechanically robust 4. Cells do not warp 5. Flexible infiltration process: - allows for variety of catalyst compositions based on fuel composition -multi-layer catalysts allow for targeted applications 6. Excellent current collection (weld on both sides) Electrolysis Nissan’s SOFC-powered Vehicle 30 mm 65 x 80 mm 50 x 50 mm Infiltration High Performance Flame impingement on bare cell (heated in seconds) Minimal cell-to-cell variation

Transcript of Progress in Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells 0 50 100 ......Electrochemical Technologies...

  • Electrochemical Technologies Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

    Progress in Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

    UNIVERSITY OF

    CALIFORNIA

    Power Density Progress at LBNL Symmetric-Architecture at LBNL

    The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), U.S.

    Department of Energy under work authorization number 13/CJ000/04/03. This work was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under

    contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

    Emir Dogdibegovic, Ruofan Wang, and Michael C. Tucker

    Durability

    Thermal and Redox Cycling

    Current Collectors Welded on Cell

    air

    fuel

    Fabrication

    MS-SOFC Scalability

    1. Tape casting and lamination of all cell layers in a single step

    2. Co-sintered ceramic and stainless steel layers in reducing atmosphere (catalyst absent)

    3. Catalyst introduced by infiltration (flexible catalyst compositions)

    0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.200.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20700 C, EIS @ OCV

    Cell 1

    Cell 2

    -Z"

    (Ohm

    cm

    2 )

    Z' (Ohmcm2)

    0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20-0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    -Z"

    (Ohm

    cm

    2 )

    Z' (Ohmcm2)

    600 650 700 750 8000.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2.0

    2.4

    2.8

    3.2

    Improved

    Pea

    k P

    ower

    (W

    /cm

    2 )

    Temperature (°C)

    Baseline

    0 1 2 3

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    Current Density (A cm-2)

    Vol

    tage

    (V

    )

    0.0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    Pow

    er D

    ensi

    ty (

    W c

    m-2)1.56 W/cm

    2 at 700 C

    POx fuel

    Excellent thermal shock/gradient tolerance

    Stable performance after multiple thermal cycles

    Hydrogen SOFC on test rig (thermal and redox cycling)

    Advantages of symmetric-architecture MS-SOFCs

    1. Extreme thermal cycling

    2. Redox stable

    3. Mechanically robust

    4. Cells do not warp

    5. Flexible infiltration process:

    - allows for variety of catalyst compositions based on

    fuel composition

    -multi-layer catalysts allow for targeted applications

    6. Excellent current collection (weld on both sides)

    Electrolysis

    ASR (∙cm2) Baseline December

    2017

    March

    2018

    June

    2018

    Goal

    TOTAL 0.28 0.144 0.128 0.118 0.115

    Ohmic 0.09 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.037

    Electrolyte 0.055 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023

    Electrode Ohmic 0.035 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014

    Electrode Polarization 0.19 0.107 0.091 0.081 0.078

    Anode 0.039

    Cathode 0.039

    New electrolyte New catalysts Optimized cell and catalyst processing

    0 25 50 75 1001.090

    1.095

    1.100

    1.105

    1.110

    OC

    V (

    V)

    Time (hours)

    Cell 4

    Cell 3

    Cell 2

    Cell 1

    operated @ 0.7 V, 700 C

    0 50 1000.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    minor degradation