Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch....

29
Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1- 1.2

Transcript of Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch....

Page 1: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Profit MaximizationSingle variable unconstrained optimization

Econ 494

Spring 2013

Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2

Page 2: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Agenda

• Single variable, unconstrained optimization• First and second order conditions

• Application: Profit maximization• Silb., Section 1.5

• Problem set 2 due Mon, Feb 4

2

Page 3: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

3

Calculus Review:Single variable optimization

Maximum Minimum

1. Objective Function

2. FONC(First-order necessary conditions)

3. SOSC (Second-order sufficient conditions)

2

2( ) 0

d zg x

dx

2

2( ) 0

d zg x

dx

( )xMax z g x

( ) 0dz

g xdx

Page 4: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Application:Firm’s behavior• For most of this course, we will be making assertions about

the behavior of economic agents, and then developing refutable hypotheses that logically follow from these assertions.

• Usually, we will assert that economic agents optimize some objective function, , possibly with some constraints.

4

Page 5: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Examples

• Some optimization examples:• Firms maximize profits• Firms maximize total revenue• Firms minimize costs• Individuals maximize utility subject to a budget constraint

• Each of these theories can be tested by developing refutable hypotheses and testing whether results conform to the predictions.

5

Also see Silb. Examples 1-5, p. 16-21

Page 6: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Profit Maximization

• Assertion: Firms maximize profits , where equals total revenue minus total costs.

• Some definitions. Let:• = firm’s total output (firm chooses )• = total revenue function• = total cost function

6

Page 7: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Generic Profit Maximization Problem

• Step 1: Set up the objective function

• Step 2: Find FONC

• Step 3: Find SOSC

7

( ) ( ) ( )yMax y R y C y

( ) ( ) ( ) 0y R y C y

( ) ( ) ( ) 0y R y C y

( )xMax z g x

( ) 0dz

g xdx

2

2( ) 0

d zg x

dx

KEEP THIS SLIDE HANDY !

Page 8: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Profit Maximization

• The preceding problem was in a general form. Most profit max problems we encounter will be variations on this theme.• *** A key to most economic problems will be correctly specifying the

objective function. ***

• What would the objective function look like if:• the firm sells its output in a perfectly competitive market (i.e., price

taker)?• OR: there is only one firm supplying many buyers (monopolist)?• OR: the firm faces some sort of tax per-unit of output?• OR: the firm maximizes total revenue?

• Each of these theories about the firm will result in a different objective function, and possibly, a different set of refutable hypotheses.

8

Page 9: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Begin with some assertions

9

Monopoly Perfect Competition

Firm behavior Maximize profits by combining inputs into outputs

Output market Many buyers, Single seller

Many buyers, many sellers

Input market Many buyers, many sellers

Information Perfect information about prices, technology, costs, etc.

Technology Each firm knows it technological capabilities and is technically efficient.

Page 10: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

10

Two Alternative Theories:Monopoly vs. perfect competition

Monopolist Perfect competition

Total Rev.

Total Cost

Total taxes paid

Objective Function

Endogenous Vbls (Choice)

Exogenous Vbls. (parameters)

( ; )y pR yp

; , ) ( )yMax y t y yp yp C t

( )C y

t y

, which effects ( )y C y

,p t

; ) ( )( )y

p yMax y t y C y t y

(( )) pR yyy

( )C y

t y

, which effects ( ) and ( )y C y p y

t

Page 11: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Example 1: Perfect Competition

• A firm sells output, , in a perfectly competitive market with exogenous price .

• Firm faces a per-unit tax, .• Cost function , with

• Postulates• Many firms. This is a postulate about how the market operates.• Many consumers. No consumer can exert influence over prices.• Cost function .• Firm maximizes profits.

11

Page 12: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Objective function

• Step 1: Set up objective function for a profit-maximizing, perfectly competitive firm facing a per-unit tax.

12

Parameters are:p>0; k>0; t>0

Choice variable is:y>0

In general:

; , , ) ( ; ) ( ; )yMax y p k t R y p C y k t y

2

In this example:

; , , )yMax y p k t p y k y t y

Page 13: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

First-order necessary conditions (FONC)

• Step 2: Find FONC

13

2Obj. fctn: Max ; , , ) y

y p k t p y k y t y

In general:

( ; , , ) 0() ;; )(R C y ky p y p MRtk MCt

NOTE: The FONC are the implicit form of the firm’s choice function.

In this exam

2

ple:

( ; , , ) 0y p k t tp k y

Page 14: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

A note on the FONC

• We do not assert that the “optimum” output for a firm is where • The FONC () is a necessary event, logically deduced from the

assertion of profit max.• What if the FONC are not observed?

• Does this imply disequilibrium or non-optimal behavior?• NO! If the FONC are not observed it constitutes a refutation of the model.• We assert that firms act as if they are obeying the FONC and SOSC, and on

that account we make predictions about their behavior.

14

Page 15: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Second-order sufficient conditions (SOSC)

• Step 3: Find SOSC:

15

2Obj. fctn: Max ; , , )

FONC: ( ; , , ) 2 0

y

y p k t p y k y t y

y p k t p k y t

In general:

( ) ( ) ( ) 0y R y C y

Remember, the FONC alone do not guarantee maximum profits!

In this example:

( ; ) 2 0 (Recall 0) y k k k

Page 16: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Solve for

• Step 4: Find the explicit choice function • How would you solve for ??

16

( ; , , ) *( , , )02

2

y p k t p k y tt p

y p k tk

IMPORTANT!!

The explicit choice function will always be a function of all the parameters in the FONC, but not necessarily all parameters in the original objective function.

2Obj. fctn: Max ; , , )

FONC: ( ; , , ) 2 0

y

y p k t p y k y t y

y p k t p k y t

The FONC implicitly defines Loosely speaking, y*(p,k,t) is not yet

“alone” on the left-hand side (LHS) We could solve for , but have not yet

done so

This explicitly defines

Page 17: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Solve for

• How did you know that you could solve the FONC for ?• When the FONC take a specific form, it’s usually easy to see

that we can solve it.

• But…we will often be dealing with more general forms where the solution may not be so obvious:

• How do you know you can solve this for ?

17

( ; , , ) *( , , )02

2

y p k t p k y tt p

y p k tk

Page 18: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Implicit Function Theorem (IFT)

• The FONC are an implicit relationship between the variables and parameters

• If the SOSC are non-zero, by the IFT, we can, in principle, solve the FONC for the explicit choice function.• This is a sufficient condition (not necessary)• For a more thorough discussion, see Silb section 5.3.

• Key: The IFT allows us to assert that a solution to the FONC exists.

18

Page 19: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Solve for

• Step 4 revisited: Find choice function

19

FONC

In general: ( ; ) ( ; ) 0R y p C y k t

FONC

In this example: 2 0

*( , , )2

p k y t

t py p k t

k

By the IFT, since the SOSC are non-zero, we know we can in principle solve the FONC for the explicit choice function, .

Look at the denominator.Why is the SOSC ≠ 0

important?

Page 20: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

A comment on the SOSC

• Note that the SOSC serve some important purposes• Confirm that a solution to the FONC exists• Confirm that the solution is a maximum or a minimum• Later you will see that the sign of the SOSC is useful in determining the

sign of comparative statics

20

Page 21: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

What have we accomplished?

• We have now solved the FONC for the explicit choice function .

• In many cases, the interesting question isn’t whether or . Instead, we often want to know how the firm’s decisions will be affected by a change in one of the parameters (price, tax, cost).• Model can be useful in predicting changes in choice variables due to a

change in a parameter (refutable hypotheses).• In economics, theories are tested on the basis of these changes.

21

Page 22: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Review• Step 1. Set up objective function

• Step 2. Find FONC. Interpret.

• Step 3. Find SOSC. Interpret.

• Step 4. Use IFT to solve FONC for choice function

• Step 5. Comparative statics (next class…)

22

; , , ) ( ; ) ( ; )yMax y p k t R y p C y k t y

; , , ) ( ; ) ( ; ) 0y p k t R y p C y k t

; , ) ( ; ) ( ; ) 0y p k R y p C y k

* *( , , )y y p k t

Page 23: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

Example 2: Monopolist (from practice quiz)

• A monopolist faces the demand curve .• Inverse demand curve:

• Cost function .• are all strictly positive constants.

• Postulates• Single firm. This is a postulate about how the market operates.• Many consumers. No consumer can exert influence over prices.• Cost function .• Firm maximizes profits.

23

Page 24: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

24

Step 1: Set up objective function

( ; , , , ) ( ; , ) ( ; , )yMax y a b c d R y a b C y c d

( ; , , , ) ( ; , ) ( ; , )yMax y a b c d p y a b y C y c d

21( ; , , , ) ( )

y

aMax y a b c d y y c d y

b b

Page 25: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

25

Step 2: Find FONC

FONC

2( ; , , ) 2 0

ay a b d y d y

y b b

2

2 2

1( ; , , , ) ( )

1( ; , , , ) ( )

y

y

aMax y a b c d y y c d y

b b

aMax y a b c d y y c d y

b b

Note that dropped out.

Page 26: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

26

Step 3: Find SOSC

0

2

0

2

SOSC

2 1( ; , ) 2 2 0y b d d d

y b b

2 21( ; , , , ) ( )

y

aMax y a b c d y y c d y

b b

FONC

2( ; , , ) 2 0

ay a b d y d y

y b b

y* is a maximum

Page 27: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

27

Step 4: Solve FONC for

• Note that can also be simplified to , but the way it is expressed above is handy because it retains the SOSC in the denominator.

• Why isn’t a function of as well?

FONC

2( ; , ; ) 2 0

ay a b d y d y

y b b

2

2

SOSC

1( ; , ) 2 0y b d d

y b

/*( , , )

12

a by a b d

db

21( ; , , , )

y

aMax y a b d y d y

b bc c

Page 28: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

28

and are different functions

• is the demand function• It tells you how much consumers would buy at any given price (for a

particular set of parameters ).

• is the firm’s optimal output for any given set of parameters .• It is an equilibrium condition that accounts for both consumer demand

and the firm costs. • It essentially defines the intersection of supply and demand. • When or shifts, this means demand is shifting – which causes the

intersection of supply and demand, , to also change. • Likewise, a change in represents a change in the firm’s costs. • The function is just a mathematical representation of this concept.

Page 29: Profit Maximization Single variable unconstrained optimization Econ 494 Spring 2013 Hands Ch. 1.1-1.2.

29

Solving problems with generic notation

• On your own, review handout “Solving problems with generic notation”