Professional Experience - Supreme Advocacy · 2017-2018 Visiting Professor, Université Paris II,...

Paul Daly

University Research Chair in Administrative Law & Governance 57 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

1

Professional Experience

2019- University Research Chair in Administrative Law & Governance, Faculty of Law (Common Law Section), University of Ottawa

2019- Review Officer, Environmental Protection Tribunal of Canada

2016-2019 Senior Lecturer in Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge

2016-2019 Derek Bowett Fellow in Law, Queens’ College, Cambridge

2017-2019 Deputy Director of Graduate Research, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge

2017-2018 Visiting Professor, Université Paris II, Panthéon-Assas

2016 Associate Professor, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal

2015-2016 Associate Dean and Faculty Secretary, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal

2012-2015 Assistant Professor, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal

2011-2012 Student-at-Law, Lerners LLP, Toronto

2010-2011 Replacement Professor, Faculty of Law (Common Law Section), University of Ottawa

2009-2010 Visiting Researcher, Harvard Law School

2008-2009 Supervisor, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Cambridge

Education 2007-2010 Ph.D. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law & Queens’ College 2006-2007 LL.M. University of Pennsylvania Law School 2005-2006 LL.M. University College Cork 2002-2005 B.C.L. University College Cork

Paul Daly


2

Publications BOOKS

MONOGRAPHS

1. A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope

(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

2. Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World (draft)

EDITED COLLECTIONS

1. Researching Public Law in Common Law Systems (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, under

contract), co-editor, with Joe Tomlinson

2. Apex Courts and the Common Law (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2019)

(editor)

3. The Canadian Constitution in Transition (University of Toronto Press, Toronto,

2019) (co-editor, with Richard Albert and Vanessa MacDonnell)

4. The Dunsmuir Decade/Les 10 ans de Dunsmuir (2018) Special Issue of Canadian

Journal of Administrative Law & Practice (co-editor, with Léonid Sirota)

TEXTBOOKS

1. Hogan and Morgan’s Administrative Law in Ireland (5th ed., Roundhall, Dublin,

2020, (in press), co-author, with Gerard Hogan and David Morgan)

2. Torts: Text and Cases (Éditions JFD, Montreal, 2015)

3. Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Its History and Future

(LexisNexis Canada, Toronto, 2014) (contributor, with Joseph Robertson and Peter

Gall)

4. Hogan and Morgan’s Administrative Law in Ireland (4th ed., Roundhall, Dublin,

2010) (contributor, with Gerard Hogan and David Morgan)

Paul Daly


3

PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES

1. “A Typology of Materiality” (2019) 26 Australian Journal of Administrative Law

134-144

2. “Judicial Independence and Accountability in the United Kingdom” (2019) 1

European Journal of Constitutional Law 141-168

3. “Substantive Review in the Common Law World: AAA v Minister for Justice in

Comparative Perspective” [2019] Irish Supreme Court Review 105-124

4. « Reprendre le contrôle : ironies et ennuis » (2018) 51 Revue juridique Thémis 159-

188

5. “Updating the Procedural Law of Judicial Review of Administrative Action” (2018)

51 University of British Columbia Law Review 705-737

6. “Miller: Legal and Political Fault Lines” [2017] Public Law (Brexit Special Issue) 73-

93

7. “The Signal and the Noise in Administrative Law” (2017) 68 University of New

Brunswick Law Journal 68-86

8. “Royal Treatment: The Special Status of the Crown in Administrative Law” (2017)

22 Review of Constitutional Studies 81-102

9. “The Language of Administrative Law” (2016) 94 Canadian Bar Review 519-544

10. “Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law: Recent Cases on

Standard of Review and Reasonableness” (2016) 62 McGill Law Journal 527-566

11. “The Principle of Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law” (2016) 49 Revue

juridique Thémis 757-780

12. “A Supreme Court’s Place in the Constitutional Order – Contrasting Recent

Experiences in Canada and the United Kingdom” (2015) 41 Queen’s Law Journal 1-

40

Paul Daly


4

13. « Les appels administratifs au Canada » (2015) 93 Revue du Barreau canadien 71-

107

14. “Legal Academia 2.0: New and Old Models of Academic Influence and Engagement”

(2015) 20 Lex Electronica 39-50

15. “The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review” (2015) 52 Alberta Law Review

799-827

16. “Canada’s Bi-Polar Administrative Law: Time for Fusion” (2014) 40(1) Queen’s Law

Journal 213-239

17. “Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada’s Long-Gun Registry as Case Study”

(2014) 33 National Journal of Constitutional Law 169-193

18. “Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights: Administrative Law and Section 1 of the

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms” (2014) 65 Supreme Court Law Review

(2d) 247-290

19. “Furthering Substantive Equality through Administrative Law: Charter Values in

Education” (2013) 63 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 169-205 (with Angela

Cameron)

20. “Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review” (2012) 58

McGill Law Journal 483-507

21. “The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law”

(2012) 50 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 317-360

22. “Deference on Questions of Law” (2011) 74 Modern Law Review 694-720

23. “Wednesbury’s Reason and Structure” [2011] Public Law 237-259

24. “Standards of Review in Irish Administrative Law after Meadows” (2010) 32 Dublin

University Law Journal 379-398

25. “Judicial Review and the ‘Political Question’ Doctrine” [2010] Public Law 160-180

Paul Daly


5

26. “Judicial Review and ‘Political Questions’ in Ireland” (2008)(2) Judicial Studies

Institute Journal 99-129

27. “Judicial Review of Factual Error in Ireland” (2008) 30 Dublin University Law

Journal 187-213

28. “Judicial Review of Errors of Law in Ireland” (2006) xli Irish Jurist 60-89

BOOK CHAPTERS

1. “Facticity: Judicial Review of Factual Error in Comparative Perspective” in Peter

Cane, Eric Ip, Herwig Hoffman and Peter Lindseth eds., Oxford Handbook on

Comparative Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020) (14 pp,

forthcoming)

2. “The Administrative State and the Courts” in David Farrell and Niamh Howlin eds.,

Oxford Handbook of Irish Politics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2020) (18 pp,

forthcoming)

3. “Divergence and Convergence in English and Canadian Administrative Law” in

Michael Ramsden and Swati Jhaveri eds., Indigenizing Administrative Law

(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019) (18 pp, in press)

4. “The Constitutionalisation of English Judicial Review in Ireland: Continuity and

Change” in Michael Ramsden and Swati Jhaveri eds. Indigenizing Administrative

Law (Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, 2019) (16 pp, in press)

5. “Introduction: Apex Courts from Top to Bottom” in Paul Daly ed., Apex Courts and

the Common Law (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2019) 3-21

6. “Introduction: The Constitution in a New Key” in Richard Albert, Paul Daly and

Vanessa MacDonnell eds., The Canadian Constitution in Transition (University of

Toronto Press, Toronto, 2019) 3-18 (with Richard Albert and Vanessa MacDonnell)

Paul Daly


6

7. “Section 96: Striking a Balance between Legal Centralism and Legal Pluralism” in

Richard Albert, Paul Daly and Vanessa MacDonnell eds., The Canadian Constitution

in Transition (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2019) 84-102

8. « La bonne foi et la common law : l’arrêt Bhasin c. Hrynew » in Jéremie Torres-

Ceyte ed., Le(s) dialogue(s) en droit civil (Éditions Thémis, Montreal, 2018) 90-107

9. “Administrative Law: Characteristics, Legitimacy, Unity” in Mark Elliott, Jason

Varuhas and Shona Stark eds., The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and

Comparative Perspectives (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2018) 99-119

10. “The Court and Administrative Law: Models of Rights Protection” in Matthew

Harrington ed., The Court and the Constitution: A 150-Year Retrospective

(LexisNexis, Toronto, 2017) 57-79

11. “A Pluralist Account of Deference and Legitimate Expectations” in Matthew Groves

and Greg Weeks eds., Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law World (Hart

Publishing, Oxford, 2017), 101-120

12. “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach” in John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason

Varuhas and Philip Murray eds., Public Law Adjudication in the Common Law

World: Process and Substance (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2016), 23-44

13. “The Struggle for Deference in Canada” in Mark Elliott and Hanna Wilberg eds., The

Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow (Hart

Publishing, Oxford, 2015), 297-325

14. “Unreasonable Interpretations of Law” in Joseph Robertson, Peter Gall and Paul

Daly, Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals in Canada: its History and

Future (LexisNexis Canada, Toronto, 2014), 233-270

15. « Le contrôle de la légalité de l’administration », dans JurisClasseur Québec, coll. «

Droit public », Droit administratif, fasc.11, Montréal, LexisNexis Canada, 2013,

looseleaf, 30 pages

Paul Daly


7

16. “Courts and Copyright: Some Thoughts on Standard of Review” in Michael Geist ed.,

The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations

of Canadian Copyright Law (University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2013), 47-69

17. “Blown Out of All Proportion: the Case Against Proportionality as an Independent

Head of Review” in Cian C. Murphy and Penny Green eds., Law and Outsiders:

Norms, Processes and ‘Othering’ in the Twenty-First Century (Hart, Oxford, 2011),

23-42

REVIEWS AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS

1. “The Limits of Public Law: J.W. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 20”

(2019) 32 Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice 231-236

2. “Doubts about Deference: Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defence Council”


3. “Parliamentary Sovereignty and Intergovernmental Agreements: Reference re Pan-

Canadian Securities Regulation, 2018 SCC 48” (2019) 32 Canadian Journal of

Administrative Law & Practice 57-62

4. Review of Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays on Themes in the Work of

Jerry L. Mashaw (2018) 78 Cambridge Law Journal 644-647

5. Review of Complexity’s Embrace: the International Law Implications of Brexit

(2018) 73 International Journal 635-638

6. “Right and Wrong on the Scope of Judicial Review: Wall v Highwood Congregation”


7. “Reasons and Reasonableness in Administrative Law: Delta Air Lines Inc. v Lukacs”


8. “Brewing Up Reasons” (2017) 76 Cambridge Law Journal 11-14

9. “Procedure, Values and the Conceptual Unity of Administrative Law” in Mark Elliott

and Robert Thomas, Public Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017), 586-588

Paul Daly


8

10. Robert Leckey, Bills of Rights in the Common Law (2016) 79 Modern Law Review

1147-1151

11. “Constituting Canada” (Review of The Constitution of Canada: An Introduction to its

Development and Law, by W.P.M. Kennedy, introduction by Martin Friedland), The

New Rambler Review, December 23, 2015

12. “The Policy/Operational Distinction in Canadian Tort Law: A View from

Administrative Law” (2015) 69 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 17-40

13. « L’abolition du registre des armes d’épaule: le rôle potentiel des principes non

écrits » (2014) 23(4) Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 41-48

14. Jack Balkin, Living Originalism (2014) 65 University of Toronto Law Journal 133-

136

15. “Reviewing Britain’s Tribunal System” (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal 494-497

16. Eoin Carolan ed., The Constitution of Ireland: Perspectives and Prospects (2013) 72

Cambridge Law Journal 451-453

17. “Cognitive Tics of the Herd” (Review of Andrew Ross Sorkin, Too Big to Fail)

(2010) 13 Dublin Review of Books

18. Oran Doyle and Eoin Carolan eds., The Irish Constitution: Governance and Values

(2009) 68 Cambridge Law Journal 659-661

19. “A Sound Constitution” (Review of Dermot Keogh and Andrew McCarthy, The

Making of the Irish Constitution 1937) (2008) 3 Dublin Review of Books

20. “Deference and Redefining Reasonableness” [2007] Bar Review 216-219

21. “Explaining ‘Jurisdiction’” [2007] Irish Law Times 72-76

PARLIAMENTARY SUBMISSIONS AND REPORTS

1. “Brexit and EU Nationals: Options for Implementation in UK Law”, Centre for

European Legal Studies/Centre for Public Law Working Paper, Cambridge

(November 24, 2017) (with Kenneth Armstrong and Kirsty Hughes)

Paul Daly


9

2. “Implementing Transition: How Would it Work?”, Centre for European Legal

Studies/Centre for Public Law Working Paper, Cambridge (October 13, 2017) (with

Kenneth Armstrong, John Bell and Mark Elliott)

3. “Submissions to Constitution Committee Legislative Process Inquiry”, House of

Lords, London (January 25, 2017)

4. “Best Practices in Administrative Decision-Making: Viewing the Copyright Board of

Canada in a Comparative Light”, Heritage Canada, Ottawa (November 23, 2016)

5. “Copyright Act Five-Year Review”, Senate Standing Committee on Banking, Trade

and Commerce, Senate of Canada, Ottawa (November 3, 2016)

6. “Submissions to Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs re

Modifications to the Supreme Court Act”, Senate of Canada, Ottawa (November 21,

2013)

COMMENTARY

1. ICon Blog, “Book Review: Paul Daly on Oran Doyle’s “The Constitution of Ireland:

A Contextual Analysis”, October 23, 2019

2. Spectator Coffee House (Blog), “The Brexit legal challenges that could force Britain

to leave without a deal”, February 6, 2019

3. Prospect Magazine (Blog), “A No Deal Brexit is more likely than you think, because

of legislation you’ve never heard of”, February 6, 2019

4. Administrative Law in the Common Law World, “Three Aspects of Anisminic”,

November 27, 2018

5. UK Constitutional Law Group Blog, “EU Law in the UK after Brexit: EU Nationals’

Rights and a Transitional Period”, December 15, 2017

6. Per Curiam, “The Reasons for Reasons”, April 24, 2017

Paul Daly


10

7. Administrative Law in the Common Law World, “Voidness and Values”, March 3,

2017

8. Montreal Gazette, “Quebecers shouldn’t lose sight of Charbonneau commission

recommendations”, December 21, 2015

9. ICon Blog, “Cooperative Federalism Divides the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec

(Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General)”, March 30, 2015

10. Ottawa Citizen, “The Gun Registry Test of Federalism”, October 7, 2014

11. Ottawa Citizen, “Fall-Out from the Nadon decision”, May 22, 2014 (with Carissima

Mathen)

12. Montreal Gazette, “Appeal Court Erred with Registry”, July 2, 2013

13. UK Constitutional Law Group Blog, “Death, Democracy and Delegation”, May 14,

2013

14. Human Rights in Ireland Blog, “Guidelines and Assisted Suicide”, April 29, 2013

15. National Post, “Supreme Court not likely to entertain an appeal after Rob Ford wins

his appeal on a ‘technicality’”, January 25, 2013

16. National Post, “Divisional Court Should Overturn Flawed Rob Ford Decision”,

December 12, 2012

17. UK Constitutional Law Group Blog, “Clinging to Gun Data”, November 22, 2012

18. UK Constitutional Law Group Blog, “Taking Statutes Seriously”, July 26, 2012

19. Human Rights in Ireland Blog, “Referendum-itis”, July 18, 2012

20. Human Rights in Ireland Blog, “No Solicitors on Escalators: Some Thoughts on

Statutory Interpretation and Carmody”, November 27, 2009

JUDICIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CITATIONS

1. Donegan v Dublin City Council 2012 IESC 18 (Supreme Court of Ireland), citing

“Judicial Review of Factual Error in Ireland”

Paul Daly


11

2. Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission v Allen 2014 NLCA 42

(Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador), citing “Unreasonable

Interpretations of Law”

3. Wilson v Atomic Energy of Canada Limited 2015 FCA 17 (Federal Court of Appeal),

citing “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach”

4. Loewen v Manitoba Teachers’ Society 2015 MBCA 13 (Manitoba Court of Appeal),

citing “The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative

Law”

5. Syndicat des professionnelles et professionnels du milieu de l’Éducation (SPPMEM-

CSQ) c Commission des relations du travail 2015 QCCA 570 (Quebec Court of

Appeal), citing “Canada’s Bipolar Administrative Law: Time for Fusion”

6. Quebec (Attorney General) v Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 14 (Supreme

Court of Canada), citing “Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada’s Long-Gun

Registry as Case Study”

7. Paradis Honey Limited v Canada 2015 FCA 89 (Federal Court of Appeal), citing

“The Policy/Operational Distinction in Canadian Tort Law: A View from

Administrative Law”

8. Bernard v Canada (Revenue Agency) 2015 FCA 263 (Federal Court of Appeal),

citing “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach”

9. Larochelle c Comité de déontologie policière 2015 QCCA 2105 (Quebec Court of

Appeal), citing « Les appels administratifs au Canada »

10. Hachey Livestock Transport Limited v Canada (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-

Food) 2015 CART 19 (Canadian Agricultural Review Tribunal), citing « Les appels

administratifs au Canada »

11. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Huruglica 2016 FCA 93 (Federal Court of

Appeal), citing « Les appels administratifs au Canada »

Paul Daly


12

12. Wilson v Atomic Energy of Canada Limited 2016 SCC 29 (Supreme Court of

Canada), citing “Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed”

13. NM (DRC) v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform 2016 IECA 217

(Irish Court of Appeal), citing “Judicial Review of Factual Error in Ireland”

14. Canada (Procureur général) c Zone3-XXXVI Inc 2016 CAF 242 (Federal Court of

Appeal), citing “The Principle of Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law”

15. Edmonton East (Capilano) Shopping Centre v Edmonton (City) 2016 SCC 47

(Supreme Court of Canada), citing “The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over

Substance in Canadian Administrative Law” and “Struggling Towards Coherence in

Canadian Administrative Law”

16. University of Ottawa (Re) 2017 CanLII 2024 (Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario),

citing “Charter Application by Administrative Tribunals: Statutory Interpretation”,

Administrative Law Matters, June 12, 2014

17. Canadian National Railway Company v Emerson Milling Inc 2017 FCA 79 (Federal

Court of Appeal), citing “Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative

Law”

18. Olineck v Alberta (Environmental Appeals Board) 2017 ABQB 311 (Alberta Court of

Queen’s Bench), citing “The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review” and

“The Signal and the Noise”

19. X (Re) 2017 CanLII 33034 (Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board), citing “Les

appels administratifs au Canada”

20. Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General) 2017 FCA 128 (Federal Court of

Appeal), citing “Administrative Law: a Values-Based Approach”

21. Fraternité des policiers de Châteauguay inc. c Ville de Mercier 2017 QCCA 1251

(Quebec Court of Appeal), citing “The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over

Substance”

Paul Daly


13

22. City Centre Equities Inc v Regina (City) 2018 SKCA 43 (Saskatchewan Court of

Appeal), citing “Les appels administratifs au Canada”

23. 6819265 Canada inc c Tribunal administratif du travail 2018 QCCS 2499 (Quebec

Superior Court), citing “Revisiting Dunsmuir: Food for Thought”, Administrative

Law Matters, May 11, 2018

24. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v Canada (Attorney General) 2018

SCC 31 (Supreme Court of Canada), citing “The Hopeless Quest for ‘True’ Questions

of Jurisdiction”, Administrative Law Matters, August 15, 2013

25. Law Society of British Columbia v Trinity Western University 2018 SCC 32 (Supreme

Court of Canada), citing “Prescribing Greater Protection”

26. Bonnybrook Industrial Park Development Co. Ltd. v Canada (National Revenue)

2018 FCA 136 (Federal Court of Appeal), citing “The Signal and the Noise” and

“Reasons and Reasonableness in Administrative Law”

27. Bell Canada v 7262591 Canada Inc. 2018 FCA 174 (Federal Court of Appeal), citing

“Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed”, “The Signal and the Noise”, The Dunsmuir Decade

and Administrative Law Matters

28. Rozas Del Solar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 1145 (Federal

Court of Canada), citing A Theory of Deference, “Les appels administratifs” and

Administrative Law Matters

29. Papouchine v Canada (Attorney General) 2018 FC 1138 (Federal Court of Canada),

citing “Les appels administratifs”

30. Hillier v Canada (Attorney General) 2019 FCA 44, citing The Dunsmuir Decade and


31. Trainor-Degirolamo v British Columbia (Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural

Resource Operations and Rural Development) 2019 BCSC 430 (British Columbia

Paul Daly


14

Supreme Court), citing “The Principle of Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative

Law”

32. Azzam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2019 FC 549 (Federal Court of

Canada), citing “The Principle of Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law”

33. Fernand Gilbert ltée c Procureure générale du Québec 2019 QCCQ 3344 (Court of

Quebec), citing “The Signal and the Noise”

34. Deegan v Canada (Attorney General) 2019 FC 960 (Federal Court of Canada), citing


35. Renvoi à la Cour d'appel du Québec portant sur la validité constitutionnelle des

dispositions de l'article 35 du Code de procédure civile qui fixent à moins de 85 000 $

la compétence pécuniaire exclusive de la Cour du Québec et sur la compétence

d'appel attribuée à la Cour du Québec 2019 QCCA 1492 (Quebec Court of Appeal),

citing « Les appels administratifs au Canada »

36. Mason v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2019 FC 1251 (Federal Court of

Canada), citing “Unreasonable Interpretations of Law” and “The Principle of Stare

Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law”

FUNDING AWARDS

1. University of Ottawa, Research Chair in Administrative Law & Governance,

$125,000 (2019-2024)

2. University of Cambridge, Returning Carers Scheme 2018, £5706.08 (2018)

3. Social Science and Humanities Research Council, Connection Grants, Supreme

Courts and the Common Law, $19,333 (2016)

4. Fonds Société et Culture, Start-up Programme for New Research Professors,

Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World, $50,292 (2015)

Paul Daly


15

Presentations ACADEMIC PAPERS

1. “Why Write Statutes Not Everyone Can Read?”, Université de Montréal, L’héritage

de Pierre Elliott Trudeau/The Legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau (November 8, 2019)

2. “The Inevitability of Administrative Discretion and Judgement: Implications for

Human Rights”, Journal of Commonwealth Law, Université de Montréal, Annual

Symposium (October 18, 2019)

3. “Justifying the Administrative State”, Runnymede Society, McGill Law School, A

Discussion about Administrative Law (October 16, 2019)

4. “The Generation and Guardianship of Constitutional Principles”, Canadian Group for

the Study of Parliament, Annual Conference, Ottawa (September 27, 2019)

5. “A Clash of Norms: Administrative Law and Technology”, Bonavero Institute for

Human Rights, University of Oxford, Judicial Review in the Digital Age (June 3,

2019)

6. “Artificial Administration: Administrative Law and Administrative Justice in the Age

of Machines”, Centre for Public Law, University of Cambridge, Brown Bag Seminar

(May 13, 2019)

7. “Artificial Administration: Administrative Justice in the Age of Machines”,

University of Leeds, Socio-Legal Studies Association, Annual Conference (April 4,

2019)

8. “Declaratory Relief: What do Recent Decisions from New Zealand and Scotland

Teach about the Nature and Scope of the Judicial Function?”, University of

Cambridge, Centre for Public Law, Brown Bag Seminar Series (March 11, 2019)

9. “Devolution Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective”, University of Cambridge,

Centre for Public Law, Scottish Continuity Reference Panel Discussion (January 28,

2019)

Paul Daly


16

10. “‘Taking Back Control’: A Public Lawyer’s Perspective”, Queens’ College,

Cambridge, Thomas Smith Society (October 22, 2018)

11. “Three Points on Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147”,

University of Cambridge, Centre for Public Law, Ouster Clauses from Enactment to

Interpretation: the Privacy International Case (October 20, 2018)

12. “Substantive Review in Ireland and Beyond: AAA v Minister for Justice in

Comparative and Critical Perspective”, Trinity College Dublin, Irish Supreme Court

Review (October 6, 2018)

13. “The Parole Board of England and Wales: Confidentiality, Standing, Rationality and

Independence”, University of Cambridge, Centre for Criminal Justice, Parole: Law,

Policy and Practice (July 3, 2018)

14. “Understanding and Defending Administrative Law in the Common Law World”,

University of Ottawa, Invited Speaker Series (May 31, 2018)

15. “The Administrative State Inside and Outside the Courts”, University College Dublin,

Oxford Handbook of Irish Politics Workshop (April 19, 2018)

16. “Reprendre le contrôle : ironies et ennuis”, Université de Montréal, Brexit – faire ou

défaire? (March 29, 2018)

17. “Metaphors and Constitutional Change in Canada and the United Kingdom”, McGill

Law School, Matinées constitutionnelles (March 28, 2018)

18. “Convergence and Divergence in Canadian and English Administrative Law”,

National University of Singapore, Indigenising Administrative Law (December 7,

2017)

19. “Comparing Canadian and English Administrative Law”, University of Cambridge,

Centre for Public Law Seminar (November 28, 2017)

20. “Teaching Bilingual Legislation”, La Trobe Law School, Melbourne, Symposium on

the Teaching of Legislation (October 26, 2017)

Paul Daly


17

21. “The Protection of the Citizen in English Administrative Law”, International

Congress on Law in Iran, CLi, Tehran (October 25, 2017)

22. “Public Law in a Complex World”, Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies,

Queens’ College, Cambridge, Cambridge Lectures (July 6, 2017)

23. “Administrative Law Values and the Scope of Judicial Review”, University of

Cambridge, Centre for Public Law Seminar (February 27, 2017)

24. “Theory and Methodology in Public Law: A Comment on Reconstructing Judicial

Review”, University of Cambridge, New Faces in Public Law, Centre for Public Law

(February 21, 2017)

25. “Brexit: Legal and Political Faultlines”, Philippe Kirsch Institute, Toronto, Cross

Border – Brexit (December 14, 2016)

26. “Administrative Law: Characteristics, Legitimacy, Unity”, University of Cambridge,

Public Law Conference: The Unity of Public Law? (September 13, 2016)

27. “Best Practices in Administrative Decision-Making: Viewing the Copyright Board of

Canada in a Comparative Light”, ALAI Canada, Biannual Conference, Ottawa (May

25, 2016)

28. « La bonne foi en common law : l’arrêt Bhasin c. Hrynew, [2014] 3 RCS 494 »,

Chaire Jean-Louis Beaudoin, Université de Montréal, Le dialogue en droit civil (April

29, 2016)

29. « Le cyberprofesseur », Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal, Le juriste idéal…

Qui est-il? Comment le forme-t-on? (March 18, 2016)

30. “Prescribing Surveillance by Law”, Chaire L.R. Wilson, Université de Montréal, En 2

mots – droit et tech (March 15, 2016)

31. “Antonin Scalia: His Life and Legacy”, University of Montreal, Lunchtime Seminar

Series (February 17, 2016)

Paul Daly


18

32. “Section 96: From 1867 to 2017 and Beyond”, Yale Law School, Canada at 150

Conference (December 15, 2015)

33. “The Language of Administrative Law”, Canadian Bar Association, Montreal,

Colloque hommage pour l’honorable Louis LeBel (October 29, 2015)

34. “Administrative Law Values: Theory and Methodology”, Université de Montréal,

ATLAS Agora (June 15, 2015)

35. “Blogging and Legal Education”, University of Ottawa, Canadian Association of Law

Teachers Annual Conference (June 3, 2015)

36. “Comment: Democracy and Reform in and after the Senate Reference”, McGill Law

Journal Symposium, Democracy, Federalism and the Rule of Law: The Implications

of the Senate Reference, Montreal (January 30, 2015)

37. « Le registre des armes d’épaule et le fédéralisme coopératif à la Cour suprême du

Canada », Réunion G3, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal, Colloque sur le

fédéralisme coopératif (November 28, 2014)

38. “Administrative Law: A Values-Based Approach”, University of Cambridge, Public

Law Conference: Process and Substance in Public Law (September 15-17, 2014)

39. “Reply to Justice David Stratas on State Liability”, Université de Montréal,

Compensation and the Common Law (March 21, 2014)

40. “Courts and Copyright: Some Thoughts on Deference in the Copyright Pentalogy”,

University of Ottawa, The Copyright Pentalogy Conference (October 4, 2013)

41. « La tripolarité du droit administratif canadien », Université de Montréal,

Règlementation et common law (May 10, 2013)

42. “Prescribing Greater Protection for Fundamental Rights: Revitalizing Section 1 of the

Charter”, University of Ottawa, Conference in Honour of Justice Charron (March 22,

2013)

Paul Daly


19

43. « La destruction des données du registre des armes d’épaule : le droit criminel et le

fédéralisme coopératif », Université de Montréal, Séminaires en droit public

(December 4, 2012)

44. « Réflexions auprès de la justification de propriété privée provoqués par The Field »,

Université de Montréal, Séminaires en droit privé (November 5, 2012)

45. “The Strange Parochialism of Living Originalism”, University College Cork,

Constitutional Law Seminar Series (October 30, 2012)

46. “Some Principles of Institutional Design: Considerations for Administrative

Lawyers”, University College Cork, Guest Lecture (October 30, 2012)

47. “Property Law and Literature”, University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa

Enrichment Seminar Series (November 8, 2010)

48. “The Theoretical Basis of Deference in Administrative Law”, Harvard Law School,

Visiting Scholars Colloquium (February 10, 2010)

49. “‘Jurisdiction’ and ‘Law’ in Judicial Review”, University of Cambridge Centre for

Public Law, Graduate Workshop Series (March 22, 2009)

50. “Judicial Review and ‘Political Questions’”, University of Cambridge Centre for

Public Law and Faculty of Law Chinese University of Hong Kong, Effective Judicial

Review: a Cornerstone of Good Governance (December 10, 2008)

51. “Would it be Impolitic to Kill off the ‘Political Question’ doctrine?” University of

Cambridge Centre for Public Law, Graduate Workshop Series (November 3, 2008)

52. “Blown Out of All Proportion: the Case against Proportionality as an Independent

Head of Review”, King’s College, London, International Graduate Conference (June

20, 2008)

53. “Justiciability and Judicial Review in Ireland”, University College Cork Centre for

Human Rights and Criminal Justice, Postgraduate Conference (April 18, 2008)

Paul Daly


20

54. “Mountains or Molehills: the Scope of Fundamental Rights in Administrative Law”,

University of Cambridge, Human Rights Forum (March 24, 2008)

55. “The Theoretical Case for Curial Deference”, University of Aberdeen, Arts and

Social Sciences Postgraduate Conference (January 21, 2008)

56. “Some Problems of Jurisdiction”, University College Cork, Law Faculty Staff-Student

Seminar (April 30, 2005)

JUDICIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL TRAINING

1. “Tribunal Independence: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly”, Immigration and Refugee

Board, Refugee Appeal Division Annual Training Meeting (November 4, 2019)

2. “Policies and Administrative Independence”, Veterans’ Review and Appeal Board,

Annual Meeting, Toronto (October 3, 2019)

3. “Artificial Administration: Administrative Law and Administrative Justice in the Age

of Machines”, Federal Court of Canada, Annual Education Seminar, Kingston

(September 26, 2019)

4. “Judicial Review of Artificial Administration: Substance and Procedure”, Federal

Court of Canada, Clerks’ Invited Speaker Series, Ottawa (April 29, 2019)

5. “Ten Years of Dunsmuir: What Next?”, Canadian Institute for the Administration of

Justice, Advanced Judicial Seminar on Administrative Law, Ottawa (June 1, 2018)

6. “Enforcement of Public Law Norms in the Common Law Tradition”, Centre for

Public Law, Symposium for Delegation of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the

People’s National Congress of the People’s Republic of China, Cambridge (October

20, 2017)

7. “Rebottling Old Wine: Updating the Adjectival Law of Judicial Review”, Federal

Court of Canada, Law Clerks’ Invited Speaker Series, Ottawa (April 13, 2017)

8. “The Basics of Bias”, Veterans’ Review and Appeal Board, Annual Conference,

Ottawa (March 17, 2016)

Paul Daly


21

9. “Process, Substance, Deference”, Immigration and Refugee Board, Annual

Conference, Montreal (March 8, 2016)

10. “The Analytical Structure of Reasonableness Review”, Federal Court of Canada,

Judicial Clerks’ Invited Speaker Series, Ottawa (February 17, 2016)

11. “Administrative Law in Quebec and Canada”, National Judicial Institute, Appellate

Judges Conference, Toronto (January 28, 2016)

12. “Stare Decisis in Canadian Administrative Law”, Canadian Institute for the

Administration of Justice, National Roundtable, Toronto (November 6, 2015)

13. “Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Decisions on

Standard of Review”, National Judicial Institute, Federal Court of Appeal Education

Seminar, Montebello (October 22, 2015)

14. “Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Decisions on

Standard of Review”, National Judicial Institute, Federal Court Education Seminar,

Mont Tremblant (September 30, 2015)

15. « Équité procédurale : l’heure de la norme de la décision raisonnable », Cour du

Québec, Division administrative et d’appel, Réunion annuelle, Orford (June 9, 2015)

16. « Les normes de révision administrative et d’appel », Transportation Appeals

Tribunal of Canada Annual Conference, Ottawa (October 22, 2014)

17. « Pluralisme, déférence et les appels administratifs », Cour du Québec, Réunion

annuelle des juges de la Division administrative et d’appel de la Cour du Québec,

Gatineau (November 4, 2014)

18. “Internal Appellate Review: the Role of the Refugee Appeal Division”, Immigration

and Refugee Board, Professional Development Seminar, Montreal (July 31, 2013)

19. “Canada’s Least Wanted: The Two Perspectives of the Administrative Lawyer”,

Department of Justice, Justice Canada Staff Seminar Series, Montreal (January 17,

2013)

Paul Daly


22

20. “Justiciability and Deference in Administrative and Constitutional Law”, Department

of Justice, Justice Canada Staff Seminar Series, Ottawa (January 16, 2012)

CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

1. “Waiting for Godot: Canadian Administrative Law in 2019”, Continuing Legal

Education British Columbia, Administrative Law Conference 2019, Vancouver

(November 27, 2019)

2. “Annual Update on Judicial Review”, Ontario Bar Association, Administrative Law

Section, Toronto (November 26, 2019)

3. “Are Courts Too Lenient on Public Bodies?”, Young Public Lawyers Group,

Administrative Law Event, London (June 4, 2019)


Section, Toronto (September 26, 2018)

5. “Public Law Update: England and Wales”, Public Law Group (Scotland), Annual

Conference, Edinburgh (June 11, 2018)



7. “Why Do Immigration Lawyers Dislike Deference?”, Canadian Association of

Refugee Lawyers, Annual Conference, Toronto (October 16, 2017)

8. “Rebottling Old Wine: Updating the Adjectival Law of Judicial Review”, Law

Society of Upper Canada, The Six-Minute Administrative Lawyer, Toronto (March 2,

2017)

9. “The Signal and the Noise: Reading Administrative Law Cases”, Canadian Bar

Association, Prince Edward Island Administrative and Employment Law Section,

Charlottetown (December 14, 2016)

10. “The Signal and the Noise in Administrative Law”, Law Society of Upper Canada,

Immigration Summit, Toronto (November 23, 2016)

Paul Daly


23

11. « Brexit : analyse juridique », Université de Montréal, Les Rendez-vous juridiques

(April 26, 2016)

12. “Update on Standard of Review”, Osgoode Professional Development, 11th Annual

National Forum on Administrative Law and Practice, Toronto (November 30, 2015)

13. “Recent Administrative Law Decisions”, Society of Ontario Adjudicators and

Regulators, Annual Conference, Toronto (November 5, 2015)


Section, Toronto (October 28, 2015)

15. « Attaquer une décision en révision judiciaire », Congrès de l’Association du jeune

barreau de Montréal, Montréal (May 28, 2015)

16. « Développements récents en matière de normes de contrôle », Association du

barreau canadien, Montréal (March 13, 2015)

17. “Update on Judicial Review”, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario,

Annual Conference, Toronto (March 9, 2015)

18. “Reasoned Decisions: Attacking and Defending the Record on Judicial Review”,

Canadian Bar Association, Administrative Law, Labour and Employment Law Annual

Conference, Ottawa (November 29, 2014)

19. “Internal Standard of Review”, The Canadian Institute, 14th Annual Advanced

Administrative Law and Practice Programme, Ottawa (November 19, 2013)



21. « Attaquer une décision en révision judiciaire », L’institut canadien, Formation

avancée sur le droit administratif, Montréal (June 11, 2014)

22. “2013-2014: Administrative Law’s Best and Worst”, Law Society of Upper Canada,

The Six-Minute Administrative Lawyer, Toronto (March 20, 2014)

Paul Daly


24

23. “2013: the Year of the Record”, The Canadian Institute, 13th Annual Advanced

Administrative Law and Practice Programme, Ottawa (October 29, 2013)

24. “Annual Update on Developments in Administrative Law”, Ontario Bar Association,

Administrative Law Section, Toronto (October 24, 2013)

25. « Revue annuelle de droit administratif », Association du barreau canadien, Section

droit administratif, Montréal, Québec (May 17, 2013)

26. “Standard of Review in the Copyright Cases”, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, Invited

Scholar Series, (July 14, 2012)

CONFERENCES ORGANISED

1. Administrative Law & Governance Colloquium, University of Ottawa, 2020-2024

2. Privative Clauses: From Enactment to Interpretation, University of Cambridge, Centre for Public Law, October 20, 2018

3. Implementing Transition: Making it Work, Institute for Government, London, November 9, 2017

4. New Faces in Public Law, University of Cambridge, Centre for Public Law, 2017-2019

5. Supreme Courts and the Common Law, Université de Montréal, May 27, 2016 (with Matthew Harrington)

6. Les Rendez-vous juridiques, Université de Montréal, September 2015-May 2016

7. Canada at 150, Yale Law School, New Haven, December 15, 2015 (with Richard Albert and Vanessa MacDonnell)

8. Charities and the Common Law, Université de Montréal, May 7-8, 2015 (with Matthew Harrington)

9. Appointing Supreme Court Judges in the 21st Century – Reflections on the Nadon Reference, University of Ottawa, May 28, 2014 (with Carissima Mathen)

Paul Daly


25

10. Compensation and the Common Law, Université de Montréal, March 21, 2014 (with Matthew Harrington)

11. Regulation and the Common Law, Université de Montréal, May 10, 2013 (with Matthew Harrington)

MEDIA

1. Le Devoir, « L’Ontario adopte une motion contre la loi québécoise sur la laïcité », 25/11/2019

2. Radio Canada, « Ottawa gèle des fonds pour le VIH mal dépensés par une agence franco-torontoise », 20/11/2019

3. Ask CBC, “The Progressive Caucus in the Senate”, 14/11/2019

4. Stereo Decisis, “Prorogation Fascination”, 26/9/2019

5. Radio Canada, Midi-Info, « La prorogation de Boris Johnson », 24/9/2019

6. Law Times, “Ottawa law school to study regulation of tech companies”, 28/5/2019

7. Toronto Star, “Deal gives Quebec government a bigger role in consultations for Supreme Court judge”, 15/5/2019

8. BBC Radio York, “The Withdrawal Agreement Bill”, 4/2/2019

9. Lawyers’ Daily, “Justice Côté goes own way in almost 40% of cases but her SCC admin law dissents push the court”, 24/10/2018

10. Lawyers’ Daily, “TWU ruling sheds light on religious freedom, administrative law but some questions left unresolved”, 22/6/2018

11. Lawyers’ Daily, “SCC affirms laws are not a ‘service’ open to challenge at a federal human rights tribunal”, 14/6/2018

12. Lawyers’ Daily, “Supreme Court affirms workers’ compensation board’s authority to impose fine on forestry company”, 18/5/2018

Paul Daly


26

13. Lawyers’ Daily, “SCC rules public interest standing rules developed by courts don’t apply to complaints to federal agency”, 19/1/2018

14. Lawyers’ Daily, “SCC affirms non-lawyers can represent Quebec government before social aid tribunal”, 10/11/2017

15. The Economist, “A Brexit transition deal will be harder to reach than Britain thinks”, 25/10/2017

16. Lawyers’ Daily, “SCC says conditional sentences are not terms of ‘imprisonment’ leading to immigration deportation”, 19/10/2017

17. Prospect Magazine, “What would a ‘no deal’ Brexit look like? Chaos”, 2/10/2017

18. Prospect Magazine, “Could Britain wind up extending Article 50?”, 24/9/2017

19. Listed Mag, “Rulings of Engagement”, 7/8/2017

20. Lawyers’ Daily, “SCC’s new split on standards of review reignites administrative law debate”, 27/7/2017

21. National Magazine, “Paul Daly on getting lost in description”, 4/7/2017

22. Radio Canada, MidiInfo, « La destitution du Président Trump? », 15/6/2017

23. Radio Canada, MidiInfo, « La validité du décret anti-immigration de Président Trump », 10/2/2017

24. 98.3 FM (Ireland), “President Trump’s Powers over Immigration”, 3/2/2017

25. Radio Canada, MidiInfo, « La portée du pouvoir exécutif du Président américain », 27/1/2017

26. Lawyers’ Weekly, “SCC narrowly rules Federal Court should not overstep a ‘limited role’”, 23/12/2016

27. Global Television British Columbia, “Trinity Western University Wins at Court of Appeal”, 1/11/2016

Paul Daly


27

28. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Cromwell’s exit seen as ‘major blow’ to Supreme Court”, 30/9/2016

29. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Quebec has ‘too many lawyers’, report says”, 9/5/2016

30. Canadian Lawyer, “The limits of open justice”, 4/4/2016

31. Radio Canada, MidiInfo, « Nomination de Merrick Garland à la Cour suprême des États-Unis », 16/3/2016

32. Canadian Lawyer, “Appellate judge frustrated with SCC for lack of guidance”, 25/2/2016

33. Radio Canada, MidiInfo, « Conséquences de la mort du juge Antonin Scalia », 15/2/2016

34. National Magazine, “If you want to be a Senator, now is your chance”, 3/12/2015

35. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Daly praises Rothstein’s ability to tackle ‘heavy lifting’ at SCC”, 4/9/2015

36. Toronto Star, “Marshall Rothstein muses on nine years in Canada’s Supreme Court”, 31/8/2015

37. Winnipeg Free Press, “Life Means Life unconstitutional, critics charge”, 31/8/2015

38. Radio Canada, « 10 revers de Stephen Harper à la Cour suprême », 15/4/2015

39. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Top court splits 5-4 on gun registry issue”, 10/4/2015

40. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Ruling takes wider view on faith freedom”, 3/4//2015

41. Montreal Gazette, “Quebec says it will move ahead with its own long-gun registry”, 28/3/2015

42. Globe and Mail, “Supreme Court to rule on Quebec’s bid to keep gun registry records”, 26/3/2015

43. Globe and Mail, “Ottawa set for rematch in top court over judicial appointment”, 15/3/2015

Paul Daly


28

44. Maclean’s, “The weak and uninspiring case against the niqab”, 12/3/2015

45. Epoch Times, “Tougher Sentencing Law Likely to Face Charter Challenge, Says Law Prof”, 5/3/2015

46. Globe and Mail, “Quebec Court of Appeal rules in favour of Robert Mainville appointment”, 31/12/2014

47. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Chief Justice Noel’s remarks spark debate over how far to go: ‘Differential treatment’ threatens court, top FCC judge says”, 26/12/2014

48. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Galati Fumes over a Lack of Bench Strength”, 28/11/2014

49. Law Times News, “Judge criticized for appearance of bias against Toronto lawyer”, 24/11/2014

50. Toronto Star, “Quebec lawyer Suzanne Côté named to Supreme Court of Canada”, 27/11/2014

51. Montreal Gazette, “Preserving long gun data ‘fundamental,’ Couillard says”, 7/10/2014

52. Lawyers’ Weekly, “Top federal court judge urges CBA defence”, 29/8/2014

53. Law Times Weekly, “Chief justice pushes back against bias claims, insinuations of kangaroo court”, 25/8/2014

54. Globe and Mail, “The lawyer who challenged the Harper government and won”, 22/8/2014

55. Lawyers' Weekly, “Galati’s challenge could rock judicial appointment practices”, 25/7/2014

56. Toronto Star, “Toronto lawyer Rocco Galati tries to block another Harper judicial appointment”, 16/6/2014

57. Canadian Lawyer, “Nine months on, SCC finally gets full complement”, 4/6/2014

Paul Daly


29

58. Toronto Star, “Quebec Court of Appeal judge nominated to Supreme Court of Canada”, 3/6/2014

59. Maclean’s, “Stephen Harper dances around the Marc Nadon controversy”, 28/5/2014

60. Le Devoir, « Quatre juges fédéraux sur la liste de Harper : La candidature de Marc Nadon n’était pas la seule à être irrecevable », 24/5/2014

61. Volokh Conspiracy, Washington Post, “Legal Academia 2.0”, 21/5/2014

62. L’actualité, « Harper: l’opinion de la Cour suprême sur le juge Nadon va causer des problèmes », 3/5/2014

63. Toronto Star, “Unanimous ruling sets out roadmap to constitutional change”, 25/4/2014

64. The Lawyers’ Weekly, “Court cites Constitutional cloak as barrier in tempest over Nadon”, 4/4/2014

65. Globe and Mail, “Supreme Court’s rejection of Nadon is a legal marker and a political blow”, 25/3/2014

66. Globe and Mail, “Conservatives won’t rule out another attempt to reappoint Nadon”, 24/3/2014

67. Globe and Mail, “Senate reform may suffer same fate as Nadon, legal experts say”, 22/3/2014

68. Globe and Mail, “Supreme Court rejects Harper appointee Marc Nadon”, 21/3/2014

69. Toronto Star, “Ruling leaves top court and Marc Nadon up in the air”, 21/3/2014

70. Toronto Star, “Supreme Court of Canada rejects Marc Nadon”, 21/3/2014

71. CBC News, “It's Quebec or Harper as Supreme Court decides Judge Marc Nadon's fate”, 20/3/2014

72. Globe and Mail, “A skeptical Supreme Court weighs the future of Harper’s controversial appointment”, 15/1/2014

Paul Daly


30

73. CBC News, “Supreme Court hearing on Marc Nadon: 6 questions”, 15/1/ 2014

74. Lawyers’ Weekly, “SCC upholds private label drug ban: Regulations can't be reviewed on merits”, 6/12/2013

75. Globe and Mail, “Supreme Court upholds Ontario ban on house-brand generic drugs”, 22/11/2013

76. Globe and Mail, “Weighing Senate reform without three Quebec judges ignores province’s rights, minister says”, 7/11/2013

77. McGill Law Journal Podcast, « Le renvoi sur La loi sur la cour suprême », 6/11/2013

78. Globe and Mail, “Gender balance at issue with Supreme Court vacancy”, 25/9/2013

79. Globe and Mail, “Top court rejects mobster Pierino Divito’s appeal to return to Canada”, 19/9/2013

80. CTV News, “Gun Registry Decision at the Quebec Court of Appeal”, 28/62013

81. Montreal Gazette, “Registry Advocates Pin Hopes on Supreme Court”, 28/6/2013

82. CBC Radio, The Shift, “The Irving Paper Decision in the Supreme Court of Canada”,

14/6/2013

83. Near FM, The Brief, “Assisted Suicide”, 13/6/2013

84. Toronto Now, “Everything you’ve done wrong”, 29/1/2013

85. Radio Canada, Désautels, « L’affaire Ford », 25/1/2013

86. Globe and Mail, “Legal experts debate focus of Ford ruling”, 25/1/2013

87. National Post, “With Rob Ford’s legal victory, he humiliated Toronto’s left”, 25/1/2013

88. National Post, “After Rob Ford’s court win, expect a cold winter for the Toronto Spring”, 6/12 2012

89. CBC Radio, Cross-Country Check-Up, 2/12/2012

Paul Daly


31

90. Montreal Gazette, “Toronto Controversy Pales in Comparison to Montreal Allegations”, 27/11/2012

Paul Daly


32

Miscellaneous

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

Law Society of Upper Canada

Bar of New York

Centre de recherche en droit public

LANGUAGES

English, French

NATIONALITIES

Irish, Canadian

SELECTED PEER REVIEW ACTIVITIES

Cambridge Law Journal; Cambridge University Press; Hart Publishing; Modern

Law Review; Social Science and Humanities Research Council; University of

Toronto Law Journal

PH.D. SUPERVISION

Paul Warchuk, 2017-2019

Katherine Ollerenshaw, 2018-2019

Paul Daly


33

PH.D. EXAMINATIONS

Joseph Tomlinson, “The Conceptual Foundations of the Doctrine of Legitimate

Expectations in English Administrative Law”, University of Manchester, March

2017

Barry Solaiman, “Evaluating Lobbying in the United Kingdom: Moving from a

Corruption Framework to ‘Institutional Diversion’”, University of Cambridge,

July 2017

JOURNAL MEMBERSHIPS

Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice

Journal of Commonwealth Law

La revue Thémis de l’Université de Montréal

Professional Experience - Supreme Advocacy · 2017-2018 Visiting Professor, Université Paris II,...

Documents

Transcript of Professional Experience - Supreme Advocacy · 2017-2018 Visiting Professor, Université Paris II,...