Prof SALProf. SALİH OFLUO ĞLU

PREPARING A CASE STUDYWEEK #5

MBL 607E BUILDING INFORMATION MODELS

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND COMPUTING GRADUATE PROGRAM

I.T.U INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Prof SALİH OFLUOĞLUProf. SALİH OFLUOĞLU

1ITU| FAC.ULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

2011-12

WHAT IS A CASE STUDY?WHAT IS A CASE STUDY?

A Q lit ti R h • A Qualitative Research Method for collecting information

• Case studies reveal stories and inside information

• These stories should include an in-depth analysis of the i iabout organizations, firms,

processes, events, projects, etc.

situtation

• They should also be yinteresting, innvovative, special, unique

2MBL 607E BUILDING INFORMATION MODELS

I.T.U | PROF. DR. SALİH OFLUOĞLU

COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF CASE STUDIES

• Telling stories behind a particular result and what happened to bring it about

Hi hli hti j t’ • Highlighting a project’s success, failure and characteristics making it special

• Bringing attention to a particular challenge or difficulty of a project

• Describing • What happened• When• To whom• To whom• With what consequences



WHEN SHOULD YOU USE WHEN SHOULD YOU USE A CASE STUDY RESEARCH METHOD?

• When there is a unique • Unlike many other research• When there is a unique and interesting story to be told

• Unlike many other researchmethods, it includes the context and shows a more complete picture of what complete picture of what happened and why

• Because of its detailed • Because of its detailed approach it is also used to complement other researh methods methods



ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS OF ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS OF A CASE STUDY

• ADVANTAGES • LIMITATIONS

– Provides more detailed information than other research methods (use open-ended questions)

– Difficulty of keeping the attention of a reader

C id d l i th ended questions)

– Presents data from multiple resources:

– Considered less rigorous than other research methods

– Risk of bias• Surveys• Interviews• Literature Review

– Not generalizable



PROCESS OF CONDUCTING PROCESS OF CONDUCTING A CASE STUDY

• PLANNING

Identify stake holders and info

• COLLECTING DATA

Obtain all info sources, Identify stake holders and info sources

• DEVELOPING INSTRUMENTS

Ob a a o sou ces, arrange the interviews/surveys and inform the stakeholder about the aim and the procedures with th t d

Develop survey questions and decide the protocolos to be f ll d d i

the study

• ANALYZING DATA

followed during survey interview

Review all relevant documents and interview/survey data

• WRITING THE REPORT



POTENTIAL INFOMATION RESOURCES

• Project documents • Info obtained from clients Project documents• Firm’s quarterly and annual

reportsInter ie s

Info obtained from clients and partnerships

• ObservationTrade maga ines• Interviews

• Questionarrie/survey results• Monitoring visits

• Trade magazines• Other



ELEMENTS OF A CASE STUDY

• EXECUTUVE SUMMARY • METHODOLOGY

• INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

• CHALLENGES AND HOW THEY WERE MET

• THE PROBLEM

İ

• RESULTS

İdentifying the problemExplaning why the problem is importantSteps to address the problem

• LESSONS LEARNED



EARLIER MBL607E CASE STUDIESEARLIER MBL607E CASE STUDIES

• The goal is to understand early implementation of early implementation of BIM in Turkish firms The firms in Case Studies

• Conducted as part of a PhD course by graduate students between 2009-

1. TAV Holding2. Dome Mimarlık3 Enka2010

• The firms were selected

3. Enka4. Arup Turkey

upon referrals from BIM software distributor companiesco pa es

URL: www.sayisalmimar.com/?p=69

MBL 607E BUILDING INFORMATION MODELSI.T.U | PROF. DR. SALİH OFLUOĞLU

BIM CASE STUDY 1. TAV HOLDING

• One of the top three companies in the airport facility


in the airport facility management services in the world.

• They serve 370,000 flights and 41 million passengers annually.

• This case study examinestheir domestic terminal renovation project in Istanbul Atatuk Airport. The project covers 60,000 m2 project area and required a 70 million dollar investment. Istanbul Ataturk Airport



• The face of airport terminal building was completely


building was completely modernized. The project received several international awardsawards.

• The building project was prepared by the architectural division of TAV. The 3D BIM Model of the Terminal

• It was modelled in a BIM software. Using BIM model they manage to offer initial cost

• BIM helped the firm for better design documentation data manage to offer initial cost

estimates for facility management services.

documentation, data integration and ease of updating



• The firm connected the BIM


model with its facility management software called TAV Earth.

• With BIM they were able to coordinate model based on coordinate model based on zonings.

• 3D zone information helped them also help make calculation that was difficult in the past.

New check-in island drawings


BIM CASE STUDY 2 . DOME ARCH.

• One of the earliest

BIM CASE STUDY 2 . DOME ARCH.

One of the earliest architectural firms in using BIM.

• It carries out architectural project design and construction quality

MilparkResidence

(143 000 m2)

Diamond of Istanbul

(160 000 m2)q yassurance services.

• The firm was involved in a

(143,000 m2) (160,000 m2)

wide variety of large commercial and residential building projects.

Deepo Shopping Center

(240,000 m2)

ElisiumResidential(40,000 m2)


BIM CASE STUDY 2. DOME ARCH.

• In utilization of BIM, learning process and work hierarchy

• BIM enabled the firm to offer t ti lit


process and work hierarchy resembles those of craftsmanship.

construction quality assurance services. In this mode of work one staff

id d d t f th it • The collaboration and

corporation in the offices

provided data from the site, the other updated BIM model accordingly. BIM software

ll d th t k th have similarities with labor division at the work site.

allowed them to work on the project with less staff.

A view from the office


BIM CASE STUDY 2. DOME ARCH.• After the adoptation of BIM

the firm also revised its


data sharing, folder and file naming methods.

• The firm looks for regular partnering firms and asks them to use BIM them to use BIM technology.

• They begin to think the collaborative environment supported by BIM will also pp yenable them to compete for the works abroad.


BIM CASE STUDY 3. ENKA

• One of the forty biggest contracting companies in


contracting companies in the world.

• Engineering & construction, g genergy investments, real estate, trade & manufacturing are the four sectors in which the sectors in which the business activities of ENKA are carried out.

h b ild l t • They build power plants, highways, business and shopping centers, cultural centers, residential centers, residential buildings.

Some of ENKA’s projects



• The firm began to use BIM


use a contractual requirement of the Muscat International Airport Project in Oman.

• ENKA is one of the main ENKA is one of the main contractors for the terminal building project

• The estimated value of the whole project is 1.8 billion USD.

The expansion project forMuscat International Airport



• Architectural project was design elsewhere and sent


design elsewhere and sent in DWG format. ENKA is expected to produce a 3D BIM model that incorporates pstructural and mechanical projects.

• The firm constituted three project team, each responsible for one aspect

A view from the architecture department of ENKAp p

of the process.

• The control mechanism and

p

• The building was divided into subpartsand a work e co o ec a s a d

staff hierarchy was set for worksharing.

into subpartsand a work sequence was established.



• BIM provides the precision needed in construction.


• The three dimensional coordination between the coordination between the architectural, structural and mechanical solutions is very vital. y

• The firm does not advocate the single BIM

A view from the architecture department of ENKAadvocate the single BIM

model for all tasks.

• They believe that 2D CAD

p

• This project had been a unique experience for the They believe that 2D CAD

drawings are still valid to be used in construction site.

unique experience for the firm to reconsider their corporate standards.


BIM CASE STUDY 4. ARUP TURKEY

• Arup is a multidisciplinary i ti ith


organization with many offices all around the world.

• Arup has two offices in Turkey: Istanbul and Ankara. These offices prepare construction

Kanyon Shopping Center and Residence

prepare construction documentations.

• The need for The need for multidisciplinary collaborations and complexities with projects involved foster the use of involved foster the use of BIM technologies

Forum Istanbul Shopping Center - 495,000m2(the larget shopping center in the region)



• Worksharing through


worksets is a heavily used feature of BIM in the office.

• It allows team members to work on the same projectjointlyjointly.

• Worksets can be organized di t fl l

A Worksharing error message

according to floor plan division, structural elements, and materials.

Worksetorganization



• The architecture


• Decision making for department utilizes clash detection operations.

detailing moved to earlier stages of modeling

• Data exchange between other departments is achieved with IFC or DWGachieved with IFC or DWG

• The office uses the t l f t conceptual mass feature

as an aid for modeling complex shapes .

The conceptual mass feature of Revit


FINAL PROJECT - INTRODUCTIONFINAL PROJECT INTRODUCTION

BIM, mimarlık ve bina ilgili mühendislik alanlarında tasarım, projelendirme ve üretim ile ilgili süreçler üzerinde önemli değişiklere yol açmaktadır Bu proje üzerinde önemli değişiklere yol açmaktadır. Bu proje bu değişimi anlamaya dönük bir çalışmadır. Çalışma çerçevesinde BIM teknolojilerini kullanarak gerçekleştirilen bir mimarlık/ mühendislik projesinin gerçekleştirilen bir mimarlık/ mühendislik projesinin vaka çalışması formatında bir rapor olarak hazırlanarak sunulmasını hedeflemektedir.


FINAL PROJECT - GOALSFINAL PROJECT GOALS

• BIM teknolojilerinin bina tasarımı, projelendirmesi ve/veya üretiminde kullanımını anlamak

• Farklı disiplinlerden bir araya gelen proje katılımcılarını ve bilgi değişim ortamlarını, veri değişim formatlarını ve sürece katılımlarını tespit etmekkatılımlarını tespit etmek

• Bir BIM projesinde ortaya çıkan zorlukları tanımlamak

• BIM teknolojilerinin sağladığı katkıları belirlemek

• BIM ile gelen çalışma biçiminin firmaların personel yapısı, görev dağılımı ve çalışma sistemi üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi görev dağılımı ve çalışma sistemi üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi olup olmadığını anlamak

• BIM projelerinde tasarım, projelendirme ve/veya uygulamaya dönük farklı ve innovatif kullanım biçimlerini tespit etmek


FINAL PROJECT – IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS

Firma/Proje seçimi: Firma/proje seçimi çalışmanın • Firma/Proje seçimi: Firma/proje seçimi çalışmanın başarılı ulaşmasını etkileyen önemli faktörlerden biridir. Çalışmaya katkıda bulunabileceğine inanılan bir firma ve özgün bir proje üzerinde çalışılması beklenmektedirve özgün bir proje üzerinde çalışılması beklenmektedir.

• Firma içinde temasta bulunulacak kişi(ler): Firma içinde yönetimin üst kademesinde olması veya BIM ile ilgili yönetimin üst kademesinde olması veya BIM ile ilgili süreçten sorumlu birisi olması elde edilecek bilgilerin doyurucu olmasına yardımcı olacaktır.

• Ziyaretler: Firmaya gidip ziyaret bir ya da daha fazla defa ziyaret edilerek tespitlerin yerinde yapılması önemlidir. Firmaya gidiş sayısı ve geçirilecek zaman y g ş y g çtoplanacak bilginin kalitesini ve kapsamını arttıracaktır.


FINAL PROJECT - IMPORTANT FINAL PROJECT - IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS

• Anket/mülakat soruları: Önceden hazırlanan sorular firmada görüşülen kişi(ler)e sorulacak ve alınan cevaplar kaydedilecektir Soruların niteliksel bilgi elde cevaplar kaydedilecektir. Soruların niteliksel bilgi elde atma adına açık uçlu olması faydalı olacaktır.

• Objektif olunması: Firmada görüşülecek kişilerin • Objektif olunması: Firmada görüşülecek kişilerin cevaplarını etkileyemeyecek şekilde objektif olunması ve orada bulunma sebebinin varolan bir durumu gözlemlemek olduğu unutulmamalıdır.gözlemlemek olduğu unutulmamalıdır.


FINAL PROJECT REPORTFINAL PROJECT REPORT

A-ÖZET D- METOD V i t l t k ikl i i

B- GİRİŞ/ARKAPLAN• Şirket, proje, sektör ve proje katılımcıları hakkında tanıtıcı bilgiler

• Veri toplama tekniklerinin anlatılması• Konuşulan kişilerin tanıtılması

gverilmesi• Firma/Projenin seçilmesinin nedeninin açıklanması

E-ZORLUKLAR VE AŞILMASI İÇİN YAPILANLAR• Seçilen projede gözlemlenen zorlukların tanımlanması

C- PROBLEM/İHTİYAÇ TESBİTİ• Geleneksel çalışma sistemlerindeki

eksiklikler ve ihtiyaçların ne

zorlukların tanımlanması• Bu zorlukların aşılmasının nasıl gerçekleştirildiğinin belirtilmesi

y çolduğunun belirtilmesi,

• Bu ihtiyaç/sorun nasıl tanımlandığının anlatılması

• Bu ihtiyacın gerçekleştirilmesinin

F-SONUÇLAR VE ÇIKARILAN DERSLER

• Bu ihtiyacın gerçekleştirilmesinin sağlayacağı faydaların açıklanması


CASE STUDY CALENDARCASE STUDY CALENDAR

• 18.10.2011: Project Introduction

• 01 11 2011: Proposals of firms01.11.2011: Proposals of firms

• 22.11.2011: Interim Presentation & Report 1

• 20.12.2011: Interim Presentation & Report 2

• 17.01.2012: Final Submission


Prof SALProf. SALİH OFLUO ĞLU

Documents

Transcript of Prof SALProf. SALİH OFLUO ĞLU