Production Performance

8/6/2019 Production Performance

1/48

1

CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.

I Introduction and Design of the Study 1 8

II Production Performance 9 41

III Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Suggestions 42 44

Bibliography


2/48

2

LIST OF TABLES

Table No. TITLE PAGE NO.

1. Volume production of Anna society 9

2. Value production of Anna society 11

3. Volume production of Gandhiji society 13

4. Value production of Gandhiji society 14

5. Volume production of Namnadu society 15

6. Value Production of Namnadu society 16

7. Volume production of Silambu salver society 18

8. Value production of Silambu salver society 19

9. Volume production of kamala Nehru society 20

10. Value production of kamala Nehru society 21

11. Volume production of sanjay Gandhiji society 22

12. Value production of sanjay Gandhiji society 23

13. Volume production of Anjugam society 24

14. Value production of anjugam society 25

15. Total volume of polyester 26

16 Total value of polyester 28

17. Total volume of art silk 30

18. Total value of art silk 32

19. Total volume of Cora cotton 34

20 Total value of Cora cotton 36

21 Total volume of production 38

22 Total value of production 40


3/48

3

Chapter - 1

INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN OF THE STUDY

Introduction

Production of handloom cloths has Several Processes. This process can be broadly

categorized as preloom and post loom activities. In addition to weaving production of a

cloth depends upon the designs used type of looms and capacity of the weavers

individual skill. Production is creation of goods and services. The production

management is concerned with the production process that is with all the decisions,

Activities, Restraints, Controls and plans which as Harding puts it, Enable the process to

convert these inputs into outputs. Production management deals with decision making

related to production processes, So that the resulting goods or services are produced

according to the specifications in the quantities and by the Schedules demanded and at the

minimum costs.

E.L. Brech may be defined as, Production Management is the process of effective

planning and regulating of that section of an Enterprise which is responsible for the actual

transformation of materials into finished products.

Importance of Production Management

1. Production is a line activity in any Business Organization.2. To improve the quality of goods and controlling the cost of good quality and

Reasonable.

3. The production management department of any manufacturing organizationmakes it possible the other departments activity.


4/48

4

Objectives of Production Management

1. To purchase raw materials and appliances, tools and machinery including spares asmay be required for the industry and to sell the same to the member Societies.

2. To purchase or receive for sale, the finished products of the member Societies byopening sales units Godowns, Exhibitions etc., with in the State.

3. To establish and run sales units with in and outside the area of operation forExhibition and sale of products of member Societies.

4. To hold, own, establish and hire processing units to under take and provideprocessing including dyeing, mercerizing, Printing and furnishing etc., for all types

of yarn and cloth, to the member Societies and to other institutions and individuals.

5. To advise and render assistance to member Societies in preparation of productionProgrammes design development product diversification and such qualitativeimprovement as may be necessary in the products produced by the member

Societies to be in tune with the consumer tastes and market demand.

6. To arrange for the training of weavers sponsored by the member Societies inimproved methods of weaving and latest techniques and also for the training of its

own employees in sales techniques accountancy and business administration etc.,

Production Planning

Production planning is to implement the production policy of the organization

effectively. John Kelley laid down the following factors for the success of production

planning.

1. To Gear up suitable production policy.2. To produce what is required, when it is required at minimum cost.3. To the Labour force through a series of targets. So that they have some

conception of objectives.4. Flexible, so that inevitable delays can be off set.


5/48

5

Objectives of Production planning

1. To ensure that material and components are available when and where required.2. To produce a steady flow of work through all departments.3. To preserve a balance of work.4. To provide management with information to correct for possible delays and

difficulties before they arise or become serious.

Types / Systems of production

Systems of Production

Job Production Batch Production Mass Production

Improve the production Measures

1. Improving the quality of the goods through training at weavers.2. Identifying extended markets other than Co-cooptex as the Society has to depend

on Co-cooptex for Sales.

3. Seeking export marketing through export agents as the Society is very near toKarur Town, the major textile exporting city in Tamil Nadu and,

4. Establishing in house dyeing and warping facilities to reduce the thorough outtime.


6/48

6

Production Control

The production control must establish a means of continued evaluation of

customer demand, capital position, productive capacity, Manpower etc.

Functions of Production Control

1. To forecast the demand for products, expressing quantity as a function of time.2. To monitor actual demand, compare it with forecast demand, and revise forecast

if necessary.

3. To establish economic lot sizes for purchased and for manufacturing products.4. To establish economic inventory systems.5. To establish production requirements and inventory levels of specific points in

time.

6. To make detailed production schedules job assignments, machine loadings, etc.,7. To do project planning using CPM,PERT etc.,


7/48

7

Statement of the Problem

The Handloom Sector plays a very important role in Indias economy. The

weavers production and marketing societies have emerged in the early 19th

century. The

handloom industry generates production at low capital cost; mostly use indigenous raw

material utilize local skills, widen the entrepreneurial base, facilitate balanced regional

growth and prevent the migration of labour to the metropolitan areas. Tamil Nadu has

been a traditional home for weaving industry where there is heavy concentration of

handloom weavers. They are 1386 primary handloom weavers Cooperative Societies

(PWCSS) in the state along with a state level federation Viz., The Tamil Nadu handloom

weavers Cooperative Society limited (Co-cooptex). The PWCSS are mostly production

Organizations and the Co-cooptex under take extensive marketing of handloom products

of primary weavers Cooperative societies.

Handloom industry has been playing a pivotal role in Indian economy. Handloom is

being a traditional; rural and Semi-urban. Cottage industry is highly Labour intensive in

character. In this context, handloom weavers Cooperative societies have been organized

in our country with ultimate aim of proliferating the socio economic lives of millions of

handloom weavers. However weavers Cooperatives were not functioning neither to the

expectation of members nor have accomplished the objective for which they are

organized. Every year stock, piles up, move than fifteen percent of weaver members are

thrown away from regular employment, Weavers Cooperative find it very hard in

competing with large scales mill sector and private power loom sector textile products.

Under this situation, what are the functions they perform? How do they perform? Do they

adopt effective method approach for production and marketing of their product? With a

view to finding answers to those and such other issues, the researchers have taken up a

study on production management of selected primary weavers Cooperatives Societies in

Chinnalapatty. Hence this small exercises.


8/48

8

Title of the Study

A study on the production performance of the Handloom weavers

Cooperatives in Chinnalapatty.

Objectives

1. To study the Production Management and its performance in the primaryweavers Cooperative Societies in Chinnalapatty.

2. To summarize the findings and conclusions.

Methodology

The study aims at analyzing the production management performance of the

weavers Cooperative societies in a detailed manner. There were 7 weavers Cooperatives

functioning in Chinnalapatty and all those 7 Societies were selected for the study.

Therefore it is census study. The study will rely mainly on secondary data collected from

the sources of ledgers, Production file, Account books, Audit reports and Financial

Statements. Discussions with the Officials responsible for production activities will be

held to get further information and clarifications.

Definitions of concepts

Handloom:

Handloom means any cloth woven on handloom from Cotton, Silk, Woolen Yarn or

a mixture of mill yarns. A handloom uses human power for undertaking all the motions

in weaving operation.


9/48

9

Handloom Society:

Handloom society means a primary handloom weavers Cooperative production and

sales Society, registered under the societies Act of the Government of Tamil Nadu, 1975.

These Societies are governed by the Cooperatives Act of the Government of Tamil Nadu.

Production Management:

Production, though it is often thought of as the processes involved in the operation of

a manufacturing plant, is not restricted to the making of material objects; it may also

include the performance of services. Production management is concerned with planning

and controlling the process of production so that, it moves smoothly as the required level.

Tools for Data Collection

A Comprehensive interview schedule was prepared. The items like production

quantity and value of Art silk, Cora cotton and polyester are included. The authorities of

the societies Viz., special officer and manager of these societies were interviewed to

relevant information pertaining to research collect.

Tools for Analysis

The data collected was tabulated under proper heads. Depending on the

necessity, the tables formulated they were mostly of two way tables. Based on the

tabulated figures, analysis was done followed by inferences. In course of analysis of data

simple statistical tools namely averages, percentages, ratios and related tools were used.

Reference Period

The study covers a period of ten years from 1997-98 to 2006-07.


10/48

10

Scope and Limitations of the Study

Since, the investigator have analyzed only 7 Societies of Chinnalapatty, the

conclusion they have made, may not be applicable as such to other societies. Due to lack

of time and other resources they restricted to 7 societies. The analysis and results of the

study cannot be generalized.

Chapter Scheme

1. The first chapter deals with Introduction and Design of the study.2. The second chapter deals with production management of the selected weavers

Cooperative societies.

3. The last chapter exhibits the findings and conclusions of the study


11/48

11

Chapter 2

Production Performance of Handloom Cooperatives

This part of exercise deals with the production performance effected by the

handloom cooperatives. The analysis covers the following aspects namely i) production

performance by the societies, ii) variety wise production, and iii) total production

performance.

TABLE-1

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF ANNA SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

YEAR POLYESTER ARTSILK CORRA

COTTON

COTTON TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.18(28.5)

(18.5)

0.17(26.9)

(9.2)

- 0.28(44.4)

(9.3)

0.63(100) -

1998 99 0.24(48)

(24.7)

0.12(24)

(6.5)

- 0.14(28)

(4.6)

0.50(100) -20.6

1999 00 0.10(15.6)

(10.3)

0.10(15.6)

(5.4)

0.18(28.1)

(9.6)

0.26(40.6)

(8.6)

0.64(100) 28

2000 01 0.06(10.5)

(6.1)

0.12(21.0)

(6.5)

0.21(36.8)

(11.2)

0.18(31.5)

(5.9)

0.57(100) -10.9

2001 02 0.07(10.2)(7.2)

0.11(16.1)(6.0)

0.23(33.8)(12.2)

0.27(39.7)(8.9)

0.68(100) 19.2

2002 03 0.08(12.12)

(8.2)

0.13(19.6)

(7.1)

0.21(31.8)

(11.2)

0.24(36.3)

(7.9)

0.66(100) -2.9

2003 04 0.07(12.5)

(7.2)

0.10(17.8)

(5.4)

0.18(32.1)

(9.6)

0.21(37.5)

(6.9)

0.56(100) -15.1

2004 05 0.05(5.1)

(5.1)

0.24(24.4)

(13.1)

0.25(25.5)

(13.3)

0.44(44.8)

(14.6)

0.98(100) -75

2005 06 0.07(6.3)

(7.2)

0.29(26.1)

(15.8)

0.29(26.1)

(15.5)

0.46(41.4)

(15.2)

1.11(100) 13.2

2006 07 0.05(3.7)

(5.1)

0.45(33.3)

(24.5)

0.32(23.7)

(17.1)

0.53(39.2)

(17.6)

1.35(100) 22

TOTAL 0.97(12.6) 1.83(23.8) 1.87(24.3) 3.01(39.1) 7.68

AVG 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.30 0.76


12/48

12

This table explains about the volume of production of the Anna Society. The

society producing four types of cloths namely polyester, Art silk, Cora and cotton. The

total volume of production of the society for the study period was 7.68 lakh meters the

Annual Average being 0.76 lakh meters of the four types of cloths. The Society

concentrates on cotton variety with 39percent followed by Cora cotton cloths with

24percent. The quantum of variety wise production shows a fluctuating trend in all the

years but then, the Year 2006 07 witnessed with high volume of production of cotton

18percent, Cora Cotton17percent and Art silk 25percent. But in the case of polyester the

production was high in 1998 99 with 25percent the increase or decrease of a particular

variety of cloth is influence by

i. Availability of particular type of Yarn

ii. Orders issues by the society for production of particular cloth,

iii. Open market demand, and

iv. Seasonal demand of particular variety and so on.


13/48

13

TABLE-2

VALUE PRODUCTION OF ANNA SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)

YEAR POLYESTER ARTSILK CORRACOTTON

COTTON TOTAL GR

1997 98 5.46(23.2)

(15.48)

6.93(29.5)

(11.4)

- 11.06(47.1)

(6.7)

23.45(100) -

1998 99 7.20(32.4)

(20.8)

5.12(23.0)

(8.4)

- 9.89(44.5)

(6.0)

22.21(100) -5.2

1999 00 3.08(14.9)

(8.9)

2.80(13.5)

(4.6)

4.01(19.4)

(4.8)

10.75(52.0)

(6.5)

20.64(100) -7.0

2000 01 1.80(9.7)

(5.2)

3.40(18.4)

(5.6)

5.23(28.4)

(6.3)

7.96(43.2)

(4.8)

18.39(100) -10.9

2001 02 2.10(8.1)

(6.0)

3.60(13.9)

(5.9)

6.10(23.5)

(7.4)

14.07(54.3)

(8.5)

25.87(100) 40.6

2002 03 2.40(10.4)

(6.9)

3.21(14.0)

(5.3)

5.86(25.6)

(7.1)

11.40(49.8)

(6.9)

22.87(100) -11.5

2003 04 3.50(12.3)

(10.1)

4.50(15.8)

(7.4)

6.88(24.2)

(8.3)

13.45(47.4)

(8.2)

28.33(100) 23.8

2004 05 2.90(5.6)

(8.3)

10.06(19.7)

(16.6)

10.40(20.4)

(12.6)

27.60(54.1)

(16.8)

50.96(100) 79.8

2005 06 3.50(5.7)

(10.1)

9.60(15.6)

(15.8)

20.20(32.8)

(24.5)

28.10(45.7)

(17.1)

61.40(100) 20.4

2006 07 2.60(3.8)

(7.5)

11.18(16.7)

(18.5)

23.60(35.2)

(28.6)

29.50(44.1)

(18.0)

66.88(100) 8.9

TOTAL 34.54(10.12) 60.4(17.7) 82.28(24.1) 163.78(48.0) 341

AVG 3.45 6.04 8.22 16.37 34.1


14/48

14

The table describes the value of production of Anna Society. The total value of

production of the society for the study period was Rs341 lakh and the annual study

average being Rs34.1 lakh.

The four types of cloths, the volume of cotton variety covered 48 percent,

followed by Cora cotton cloths with 24percent.

These two cloth items were high in volume naturally that reflects in value also.

The value of variety wise production has shown a fluctuating trend in all the Years.

Again the 2006 07 witnessed with high production value with regard to cotton

18percent, Cora Cotton 29percent, and Art silk (19percent).

It is noted here that 17percent volume of production has contributed to 29percent

value, whereas 25percent Art silk has contributed to 19percent value of production.

Again the polyester variety with 25percent in volume has contributed to 21percent

of value. This is because of price variations in the market.


15/48

15

TABLE-3

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF GANDHIJI SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

It is clear from the table that the annual average of three categories of cloth found

to be same 33.3 percent each. The total production of the study period was 19.68 lakh

meters and the mean of the study period was 1.96 lakh meters. The high production of

each category was found increased in the end of the three Years of the study period. For

example polyester with 22 percent in 2004 05, Art silk with 22 percent in 2005 06 and

Cora cotton with 16 percent in 2006 07. The low production of the three categories was

increased in the first part of the study period.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.37(27.0)

(5.6)

0.35(25.5)

(5.3)

0.65(47.4)

(9.8)

1.37(100) -

1998 99 0.25(14.5)

(3.8)

0.72(41.8)

(11.0)

0.75(43.6)

(11.3)

1.72(100) 25.5

1999 00 0.40(24.2)

(6.0)

0.51(30.9)

(7.8)

0.74(44.8)

(11.2)

1.65(100) -4.0

2000 01 0.43(28.8)

(6.5)

0.60(40.2)

(9.2)

0.46(30.8)

(6.9)

1.49(100) -9.6

2001 02 0.75(44.9)

(11.4)

0.35(20.9)

(5.3)

0.57(34.1)

(8.6)

1.67(100) 12

2002 03 0.59(43.3)

(8.9)

0.59(43.3)

(9.0)

0.18(13.2)

(2.7)

1.36(100) -18.5

2003 04 0.65(36.7)

(9.8)

0.56(31.6)

(8.6)

0.56(31.6)

(8.4)

1.77(100) 30.1

2004 05 1.43(50)

(21.7)

0.43(15.0)

(6.6)

1.00(34.9)

(15.1)

2.86(100) 61.5

2005 06 0.85(28.8)

(12.9)

1.45(49.1)

(22.2)

0.65(22.0)

(9.8)

2.95(100) 3.1

2006 07 0.85(29.9)

(12.9)

0.95(33.4)

(14.5)

1.04(36.6)

(15.7)

2.84(100) -3.7

TOTAL 6.57(33.3) 6.51(33.0) 6.6(33.5) 19.68

AVG 0.65 0.65 0.66 1.96


16/48

16

TABLE-4

VALUE PRODUCTION OF GANDHIJI SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)

As it is seen from the table the total value of production for the study period was

911.14 lakh and the average being 91.1 lakh. Though the volume of production of three

categories of cloth found to be the same (See earlier table) but the value shown

differently. For example 33.3 percent of Cora cotton contributed to 38 percent of the

value facilitating a 5percent increase; where as the 33 percent of polyester in quantity has

contributes to 30percent percent value of the production, resulting a 3percent decrease.

The performance of Gandhiji Society incase of value found appreciation especially in the

fourth years of study period.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 15.44(32.9)

(5.7)

14.00(29.8)

(4.7)

17.44(37.2)

(5.0)

46.88(100) -

1998 99 7.57(7.5)

(2.8)

48.00(47.7)

(16.1)

45.00(44.7)

(13.0)

100.57(100) 114.5

1999 00 20.01(28.9)

(7.4)

25.00(36.2)

(8.4)

24.01(34.7)

(6.9)

69.02(100) -31.3

2000 01 20.25(29.7)

(7.5)

23.41(34.4)

(7.8)

24.32(35.7)

(7.0)

67.96(100) -1.53

2001 02 18.03(26.9)

(6.6)

18.33(27.4)

(6.1)

30.43(45.5)

(8.8)

66.79(100) -1.7

2002 03 13.10(20.9)

(4.8)

18.20(29.0)

(6.1)

31.30(50)

(9.0)

62.60(100) -6.2

2003 04 50.03(39.9)

(18.5)

38.02(30.3)

(12.8)

37.05(29.6)

(10.7)

125.10(100) 99.8

2004 05 45.03(33.3)

(16.7)

40.05(29.6)

(13.4)

50.03(37.0)

(14.5)

135.11(100) 8.00

2005 06 40.07(35.4)

(14.8)

38.04(33.6)

(12.8)

35.00(30.9)

(10.1)

113.11(100) -16.2

2006 07 40.00(32.2)

(14.8)

33.68(27.1)

(11.3)

50.32(40.5)

(14.5)

124.00(100) 9.6

TOTAL 269.53(29.5) 296.73(32.5) 344.9(37.8) 911.14

AVG 26.9 29.6 34.4 91.1


17/48

17

TABLE-5

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF NAMNADU SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

As it is seen in the table, the total production in terms of quantity during the study

period was 7.58 lakh meters. The Annual average was 0.75 lakh meters. In the Society

also, the Cora cotton variety constituted 34 percent (Annual average) followed by Art silk

with 26 percent and polyester cloth with 20 percent the production performance of these

three categories found high in the first five years of the study period, latter it was found

declining contrary to the instance of earlier cooperatives. The reasons for such declining

followed declining in the number of looms and the production operation.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.20(33.8)

(13.0)

0.11(18.6)

(5.5)

0.28(47.4)

(6.8)

0.59(100) -

1998 99 0.13(30.9)

(8.4)

0.16(38.0)

(8.0)

0.13(30.9)

(3.2)

0.42(100) -28.8

1999 00 0.17(22.9)

(11.1)

0.19(25.6)

(9.5)

0.38(51.3)

(9.3)

0.74(100) 76.1

2000 01 0.15(13.5)

(9.8)

0.23(20.7)

(11.5)

0.73(65.7)

(17.9)

1.11(100) 50

2001 02 0.19(15.5)

(12.4)

0.30(24.5)

(15.0)

0.73(59.8)

(17.9)

1.22(100) 9.9

2002 03 0.19(17.4)

(12.4)

0.45(41.2)

(22.6)

0.45(41.2)

(11.0)

1.09(100) -10.6

2003 04 0.12(12.7)

(7.8)

0.27(28.7)

(13.5)

0.55(58.5)

(13.5)

0.94(100) -13.7

2004 05 0.06(12.7)

(3.9)

0.16(34.0)

(8.0)

0.25(53.1)

(6.1)

0.47(100) -50

2005 06 0.15(42.8)

(9.8)

0.09(25.7)

(4.5)

0.11(31.4)

(2.7)

0.35(100) -25.5

2006 07 0.17(26.1)

(11.1)

0.03(4.6)

(1.5)

0.45(69.2)

(11.0)

0.65(100) 85.7

TOTAL 1.53(20.1) 1.99(26.2) 4.06(53.5) 7.58

AVG 0.15 0.19 0.40 0.75


18/48

18

TABLE-6

VALUE PRODUCTIION OF NAMNADU SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 12.15(46.3)

(4.9)

3.04(11.6)

(3.9)

11.00(42.0)

(7.8)

26.19(100) -

1998 99 12.78(38.7)

(5.1)

3.20(9.7)

(4.1)

17.00(51.5.)

(12.2)

32.98(100) 25.9

1999 00 13.14(57.4)

(5.3)

2.70(11.7)

(3.4)

7.05(30.7)

(5.0)

22.89(100) -30.5

2000 01 23.21(62.1)

(9.3)

3.01(8.0)

(3.8)

11.12(29.7)

(7.9)

37.34(100) 63.1

2001 02 24.20(49.4)

(9.7)

9.43(19.2)

(12.1)

15.34(31.3)

(11.0)

48.97(100) 31.1

2002 03 28.18(53.8)

(11.4)

11.05(21.1)

(14.2)

13.09(25.0)

(9.3)

52.32(100) 6.8

2003 04 30.24(54.7)

(12.2)

10.35(18.7)

(13.3)

14.67(26.5)

(10.5)

55.26(100) 5.6

2004 05 33.00(54.3)

(13.3)

11.00(18.1)

(14.1)

16.72(27.5)

(12.0)

60.72(100) 9.8

2005 06 35.21(56.0)

(14.2)

10.50(16.7)

(13.5)

17.10(27.2)

(12.2)

62.81(100) 3.4

2006 07 35.02(54.2)

(14.1)

13.40(20.7)

(17.2)

16.17(25.0)

(11.6)

64.59(100) 2.8

TOTAL 247.13(53.2) 77.68(16.7) 139.26(30) 464.07

AVG 24.7 7.7 13.9 46.4


19/48

19

It is found from the table that the value of production of Namnadu Society has

been indicating a steady growth from the fourth Year of the study period. The study

period production was 464.07 lakh and the total average being 46.4 lakh, here the

production value of polyester variety stood at high, with 53percent followed by Namnadu

cotton with 30percent. If we look at correlation analysis, the value of the cloths

production constituted 54percent has a contributed to30percent only resulting in

24percent decrease. Likewise the volume of polyester production which constituted

20percent a as contributed to 53percent of value causing a 33percent increase in its value.

The case of Art silk also showed a declining percent (volume 26 to value 17percent). The

high performance with regard to value of production of three varieties found in end of the

two years of the study period.


20/48

20

TABLE-7

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF SILAMBU SELVAR SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

In case of Silambu Salver Society the total production of study period was 8.76

lakh meters and the Annual average being 0.87 lakh meters. In this study unit, the total

volume of production was shared by Art silk 38percent, Cora Cotton 35percent and

polyester with 27percent. The total annual production shows a fluctuating trend during

the study period. Of the ten Years of study period the total value found to be high in 1999

2000.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.09(9.7)

(3.8)

0.58(63.0)

(17.6)

0.25(27.1)

(8.0)

0.92(100) -

1998 99 0.06(6.1)

(2.5)

0.41(42.2)

(12.4)

0.50(51.5)

(16.0)

0.97(100) 5.4

1999 00 0.34(32.6)

(14.4)

0.35(33.6)

(10.6)

0.35(33.6)

(11.2)

1.04(100) 7.2

2000 01 0.28(32.5)(11.8)

0.29(33.7)(8.8)

0.29(33.7)(9.3)

0.86(100) -17.3

2001 02 0.31(32.6)

(13.1)

0.31(32.6)

(9.4)

0.33(34.7)

(10.6)

0.95(100) 10.4

2002 03 0.18(30.5)

(7.6)

0.21(35.5)

(6.3)

0.20(33.8)

(6.4)

0.59(100) -37.8

2003 04 0.22(33.3)

(9.3)

0.22(33.3)

(6.6)

0.22(33.3)

(7.0)

0.66(100) 11.8

2004 05 0.26(29.8)

(11.0)

0.29(33.3)

(8.8)

0.32(36.7)

(10.2)

0.87(100) 31.8

2005 06 0.30(32.2)

(12.7)

0.31(33.3)

(9.4)

0.32(34.4)

(10.2)

0.93(100) 6.8

2006 07 0.32(32.9)

(13.5)

0.32(32.9)

(9.7)

0.33(34.0)

(10.6)

0.97(100) 4.3

TOTAL 2.36(26.9) 3.29(37.5) 3.11(35.5) 8.76

AVG 0.23 0.32 0.31 0.87


21/48

21

TABLE-8

VALUE PRODUCTIION OF SILAMBU SELVAR SOCIETY (Rs. in Lakh)

The value of production of Silambu salver Society witnessed steady growth in the

first five years of the study period there after it was found declining. The total value of

the study period was Rs443.19 lakh and the study average being Rs44.3 lakh. The valueof the three varieties of a cloth indicates in equal level there is 33percent each. But

comparison of the volume of production with value gives different inference. For

Example, 38percent of quantity gives 33percent value incase of Art silk, whereas

27percent of quantity as resulted in 34percent value incase of polyester cloth.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 8.06(30.5)

(5.3)

8.68(32.8)

(5.9)

9.67(36.6)

(6.5)

26.41(100) -

1998 99 13.67(33.3)

(9.1)

13.68(33.3)

(9.4)

13.67(33.3)

(9.2)

41.02(100) 55.3

1999 00 16.35(33.3)

(10.9)

16.37(33.3)

(11.2)

16.36(33.3)

(11.0)

49.08(100) 19.6

2000 01 19.00(36.5)

(12.7)

16.00(30.7)

(11.0)

17.01(32.7)

(11.4)

52.01(100) 5.9

2001 02 17.35(33.3)

(11.6)

17.35(33.3)

(11.9)

17.35(33.3)

(11.6)

52.05(100) 0.07

2002 03 12.24(33.7)

(8.1)

12.05(33.2)

(8.2)

12.00(33.0)

(8.0)

36.29(100) -30.2

2003 04 12.73(33.3)

(8.5)

12.74(33.3)

(8.7)

12.71(33.2)

(8.5)

38.18(100) 5.2

2004 05 16.00(33.3)

(10.7)

16.01(33.3)

(11.0)

16.00(33.3)

(10.7)

48.01(100) 25.7

2005 06 16.02(33.3)

(10.7)

15.03(31.2)

(10.3)

17.02(35.4)

(11.4)

48.07(100) 0.12

2006 07 18.03(34.6)

(12.6)

17.53(33.6)

(12.0)

16.51(31.7)

(11.1)

52.07(100) 8.3

TOTAL 149.45(33.7) 145.44(32.8) 148.3(33.4) 443.19

AVG 14.9 14.5 14.8 44.3


22/48

22

TABLE-9

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF KAMALA NEHRU SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

The volume of production of Kamala Nehru Society shows fluctuating trend

during the study period. Of the three varieties of production, Cora Cotton constituted

50percent and Art silk and Polyester constituted an equal percentage 27.5 each. The high

volume of production under the three varieties found in the middle of the study period.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.07(25.9)

(1.9)

0.09(33.3)

(2.4)

0.11(40.7)

(1.8)

0.27(100) -

1998 99 0.38(29.9)

(10.5)

0.37(29.1)

(10.1)

0.52(40.9)

(8.8)

1.27(100) 370.3

1999 00 0.60(30.7)

(16.6)

0.65(33.3)

(17.9)

0.70(35.8)

(11.8)

1.95(100) 53.5

2000 01 0.37(29.3)

(10.2)

0.21(16.6)

(5.7)

0.68(53.9)

(11.5)

1.26(100) -35.3

2001 02 0.43(28.4)

(11.9)

0.29(19.2)

(7.9)

0.79(52.3)

(13.3)

1.51(100) 19.8

2002 03 0.27(26.4)

(7.4)

0.31(30.3)

(8.5)

0.44(43.1)

(7.4)

1.02(100) -32.4

2003 04 0.38(21.7)

(10.5)

0.46(26.2)

(12.6)

0.91(52)

(15.4)

1.75(100) 71.5

2004 05 0.30(28.0)

(8.3)

0.26(24.2)

(7.1)

0.51(47.6)

(8.6)

1.07(100) -38.8

2005 06 0.49(24.7)

(13.5)

0.71(35.8)

(19.5)

0.78(39.3)

(13.2)

1.98(100) 85.0

2006 07 0.32(30.1)

(8.8)

0.28(26.4)

(7.7)

0.46(43.3)

(7.7)

1.06(100) -46.4

TOTAL 3.61(27.4) 3.63(27.6) 5.90(44.9) 13.14

AVG 0.36 0.36 0.59 1.31


23/48

23

TABLE-10

VALUE PRODUCTIION OF KAMALA NEHRU SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)

The production value of Kamala Nehru Society also shows a steady increase from

the fourth year to end of the study period. The total value of the production of study

period was Rs309.5 lakh and the average being Rs 30.9 lakh. Variety wise contribution

indicates that Cora Cotton constituted 46percent and the Art silk and Polyester constituted

almost similar percentage that is 27percent each. The high performance of these three

categories was good, in the last two Years of the study period. The lowest performance

was indicated in 2000 01, incase of Art silk (5.91); Cora Cotton (9.94); and Polyester

(1.07) in 1997 98. The comparison of production quantity with production value in the

three categories show almost the similar picture there was no much difference.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 1.70(6.3)

(2.0)

10.27(38.4)

(12.2)

14.73(55.1)

(10.2)

26.70(100) -

1998 99 9.68(29.3)

(11.7)

9.42(28.5)

(11.1)

13.88(42.0)

(9.6)

32.98(100) 23.5

1999 00 9.02(32.0)

(10.9)

7.17(25.4)

(8.5)

11.95(42.4)

(8.3)

28.14(100) -14.6

2000 01 8.67(35.3)

(10.5)

5.91(24.1)

(7.0)

9.94(40.5)

(6.9)

24.52(100) -12.8

2001 02 8.82(33.3)

(10.7)

6.48(24.4)

(7.7)

11.17(42.1)

(7.7)

26.47(100) 7.9

2002 03 6.27(22.8)

(7.6)

7.46(27.1)

(8.8)

13.77(50.0)

(9.6)

27.50(100) 3.8

2003 04 8.13(26.2)

(9.9)

9.21(29.7)

(10.9)

13.64(44.0)

(9.5)

30.98(100) 12.6

2004 05 9.48(27.0)

(11.5)

8.64(24.7)

(10.2)

16.79(48.9)

(11.7)

34.91(100) 12.6

2005 06 10.96(29.9)

(13.3)

11.14(30.4)

(13.2)

14.50(39.6)

(10.1)

36.60(100) 4.8

2006 07 9.34(22.8)

(11.3)

8.42(20.6)

(10.0)

23.03(56.4)

(16.0)

40.79(100) 11.4

TOTAL 82.07(26.5) 84.12(27.1) 143.4(46.3) 309.59

AVG 8.20 8.41 14.34 30.9


24/48

24

TABLE-11

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF SANJAY GANDHIJIJI SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

Sanjay Gandhi Society also shows fluctuating trend during the study period. The

total production was 8.05 lakh meters. Total production was shared by Art silk

38percent, Cora Cotton 33percent and Polyester 29percent. Here also the high

performance was witnessed in the second half of the study period.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.17(26.5)

(7.2)

0.21(32.8)

(6.8)

0.26(40.6)

(9.8)

0.64(100) -

1998 99 0.09(28.1)

(3.8)

0.10(31.2)

(3.2)

0.13(40.6)

(4.9)

0.32(100) -50

1999 00 0.11(30.5)

(4.6)

0.11(30.5)

(3.6)

0.14(38.8)

(5.3)

0.36(100) 12.5

2000 01 0.13(32.5)(5.5)

0.17(42.5)(5.5)

0.10(25)(3.7)

0.40(100) 11.1

2001 02 0.50(33.3)

(21.1)

0.69(46)

(22.6)

0.31(20.6)

(11.7)

1.50(100) 275

2002 03 0.18(30)

(7.6)

0.22(36.6)

(7.2)

0.20(33.3)

(7.5)

0.60(100) -60

2003 04 0.17(28.3)

(7.2)

0.17(28.3)

(5.5)

0.26(43.3)

(9.8)

0.60(100) -

2004 05 0.28(36.3)

(11.8)

0.30(38.9)

(9.8)

0.19(24.6)

(7.1)

0.77(100) 28.3

2005 06 0.41(31.7)

(17.3)

0.35(27.1)

(11.4)

0.53(41.0)

(20.0)

1.29(100) 67.5

2006 07 0.32(20.3)

(13.5)

0.73(46.4)

(23.9)

0.52(33.1)

(19.6)

1.57(100) 21.7

TOTAL 2.36(29.3) 3.05(37.8) 2.64(32.7) 8.05

AVG 0.23 0.30 0.26 0.80


25/48

25

TABLE-12

VALUE PRODUCTIION OF SANJAY GANDHIJI SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)

The production value of Sanjay Gandhi Society shows a steady growth rate. The

total value of production during study period was Rs.314.3 lakh and the study average

was shared by Art silk 38percent, Cora Cotton 33percent and Polyester 29percent. The

quantity of these three categories is compared with the value. It indicated that 38percent

quantity has resulted in 43percent value incase of Art silk and 29percent quantity has a

resulted in 24percent value incase of Polyester. With regard to Cora Cotton quantity as

well as value forms the same percent.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.99(31.2)

(1.3)

1.00(31.5)

(0.7)

1.18(37.2)

(1.1)

3.17(100) -

1998 99 4.01(25.0)

(5.3)

4.89(30.5)

(3.5)

7.10(44.3)

(6.9)

16.00(100) 404.7

1999 00 5.80(32.2)

(7.7)

6.00(33.3)

(4.4)

6.20(34.4)

(6.0)

18.00(100) 12.5

2000 01 7.16(35.8)(9.5)

6.18(30.9)(4.5)

6.66(33.3)(6.4)

20.00(100) 11.1

2001 02 9.10(32.5)

(12.0)

10.18(36.3)

(7.4)

8.71(31.1)

(8.4)

27.99(100) 39.9

2002 03 9.10(30.3)

(12.0)

11.78(39.2)

(8.6)

9.12(30.4)

(8.8)

30.00(100) 7.1

2003 04 9.04(30.0)

(12.0)

8.95(29.7)

(6.5)

12.13(40.2)

(11.7)

30.12(100) 0.4

2004 05 7.18(16.8)

(9.5)

29.16(68.6)

(21.4)

6.15(14.4)

(5.9)

42.49(100) 41.0

2005 06 17.13(28.9)

(22.7)

18.88(31.9)

(13.8)

23.15(39.1)

(22.5)

59.16(100) 39.2

2006 07 5.80(8.60)

(7.7)

39.12(58.0)

(28.7)

22.46(33.3)

(21.8)

67.38(100) 13.8

TOTAL 75.31(23.9) 136.14(43.3) 102.86(32.7) 314.31

AVG 7.53 13.61 10.28 31.4


26/48

26

TABLE-13

VOLUME PRODUCTION OF ANJUGAM SOCIETY (In Lakh Meters)

In case of Anjugam Society, the total volume of production was better in the first

half of the study period. The Society registered with 9.03 meters and the annual average

being 0.9 lakh meters. The total production was shared by Cora Cotton 37percent, Art

silk 34percent and Polyester 29percent. The performance of three categories was better in

the first of the study period.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 0.23(29.1)

(8.8)

0.26(32.9)

(8.4)

0.30(37.9)

(8.9)

0.79(100) -

1998 99 0.29(20.7)

(11.1)

0.61(43.5)

(19.7)

0.50(35.7)

(14.9)

1.40(100) 77.2

1999 00 0.35(28.4)

(13.4)

0.35(28.4)

(11.3)

0.53(43.0)

(15.8)

1.23(100) -12.1

2000 01 0.16(16.6)

(6.1)

0.30(31.2)

(9.7)

0.50(52.0)

(14.9)

0.96(100) -21.9

2001 02 0.30(35.7)

(11.5)

0.28(33.3)

(9.0)

0.26(30.9)

(7.7)

0.84(100) -12.5

2002 03 0.20(35.0)

(7.6)

0.20(35.0)

(6.4)

0.17(29.8)

(5.0)

0.57(100) -32.1

2003 04 0.25(36.7)

(9.6)

0.23(33.8)

(7.4)

0.20(29.4)

(5.9)

0.68(100) 19.2

2004 05 0.30(37.0)

(11.5)

0.26(32.0)

(8.4)

0.25(30.8)

(7.4)

0.81(100) 19.1

2005 06 0.23(26.7)

(8.8)

0.32(37.2)

(10.3)

0.31(36.0)

(9.2)

0.86(100) 61.7

2006 07 0.29(32.5)

(11.1)

0.28(31.4)

(9.0)

0.32(35.9)

(9.5)

0.89(100) 3.4

TOTAL 2.6(28.7) 3.09(34.2) 3.34(36.9) 9.03

AVG 0.26 0.30 0.33 0.90


27/48

27

TABLE-14

VALUE PRODUCTIION OF ANJUGAM SOCIETY (Rs in Lakh)

The value of production of the Anjugam Society, though there was fluctuation

found better in the first half of the study period. The total value of the production during

the study period was Rs.466 lakh, and the annual average being 46.6. Of the total value

of production Polyester constituted 39percent, Art silk 36percent, and Cora Cotton

25percent. Comparison of quantity was made with value. The 29percent, of quantity has

resulted in 39percent of value incase of Polyester and 37percent quantity has a resulted in

25percent of value incase of Cora Cotton with 2percent increase in value.


COTTON

TOTAL GR

1997 98 8.00(30.8)

(4.3)

8.41(32.4)

(5.0)

9.50(36.6)

(8.2)

25.91(100) _

1998 99 18.00(30.9)

(9.7)

22.00(37.8)

(13.1)

18.15(31.2)

(15.8)

58.15(100) 124.4

1999 00 19.00(35.2)

(10.3)

22.31(41.6)

(13.3)

12.53(23.2)

(10.9)

53.84(100) -7.4

2000 01 20.13(34.6)(10.9)

23.02(39.5)(13.7)

15.00(25.7)(13.07)

58.15(100) 8.0

2001 02 20.31(38.6)

(11.0)

13.23(25.1)

(7.8)

19.00(36.1)

(16.5)

52.54(100) -9.6

2002 03 18.02(47.6)

(9.7)

13.45(35.5)

(8.0)

6.35(16.7)

(5.5)

37.82(100) -28.0

2003 04 19.00(45.4)

(10.3)

15.00(35.8)

(8.9)

7.80(18.6)

(6.7)

41.80(100) 10.5

2004 05 20.03(45.1)

(10.8)

16.00(36.0)

(9.5)

8.30(18.7)

(7.2)

44.33(100) 6.0

2005 06 21.41(44.8)

(11.6)

17.21(36.0)

(10.2)

9.13(19.1)

(7.9)

47.75(100) 7.7

2006 07 20.00(43.3)

(10.8)

17.10(37.0)

(10.1)

9.00(19.5)

(7.8)

46.10(100) -3.4

TOTAL 183.9(39.4) 167.73(35.9) 114.76(24.6) 466.36

AVG 18.3 16.7 11.4 46.6


28/48

28

TABLE-15

TOTAL VOLUME OF POLYESTER (In Lakh Meters)

YEAR ANNA GANDHIJI NAMNADU SILAMBU KAMALA SANJAY ANJU

1997 98 0.18(13.7)

(18.5)

0.37(28.2)

(5.6)

0.20(15.2)

(13.0)

0.09(6.8)

(3.8)

0.07(5.3)

(1.9)

0.17(12.9)

(7.2)

0.23(1

(8.8)

1998 99 0.24(16.6)

(24.7)

0.25(17.3)

(3.8)

0.13(9.0)

(8.4)

0.06(4.1)

(2.5)

0.38(26.3)

(10.5)

0.09(6.2)

(3.8)

0.29(2

(11.1)

1999 00 0.10(4.8)

(10.3)

0.40(19.3)

(6.0)

0.17(8.2)

(11.1)

0.34(16.4)

(14.4)

0.60(28.9)

(16.6)

0.11(5.3)

(4.6)

0.35(1

(13.4)

2000 01 0.06(3.7)

(6.1)

0.43(27.2)

(6.5)

0.15(9.4)

(9.8)

0.28(17.7)

(11.8)

0.37(23.4)

(10.2)

0.13(8.2)

(5.5)

0.16(1

(6.1)

2001 02 0.07(2.7)(7.2)

0.75(29.4)(11.4)

0.19(7.4)(12.4)

0.31(12.1)(13.1)

0.43(16.8)(11.9)

0.50(19.6)(21.1)

0.30(1(11.5)

2002 03 0.08(4.7)

(8.2)

0.59(34.9)

(8.9)

0.19(11.2)

(12.4)

0.18(10.6)

(7.6)

0.27(15.9)

(7.4)

0.18(10.6)

(7.6)

0.20(1

(7.6)

2003 04 0.07(3.7)

(7.2)

0.65(34.9)

(9.8)

0.12(6.4)

(7.8)

0.22(11.8)

(9.3)

0.38(20.4)

(10.5)

0.17(9.1)

(7.2)

0.25(1

(9.6)

2004 05 0.05(1.8)

(5.1)

1.43(53.3)

(21.7)

0.06(2.2)

(3.9)

0.26(9.7)

(11.0)

0.30(11.1)

(8.3)

0.28(10.4)

(11.8)

0.30(1

(11.5)

2005 06 0.07(2.8)

(7.2)

0.85(34)

(12.9)

0.15(6)

(9.8)

0.30(12)

(12.7)

0.49(19.6)

(13.5)

0.41(16.4)

(17.3)

0.23(9

(8.8)

2006 07 0.05(2.1)

(5.1)

0.85(36.6)

(12.9)

0.17(7.3)

(11.1)

0.32(13.7)

(13.5)

0.32(13.7)

(8.8)

0.32(13.7)

(13.5)

0.29(1

(11.1)

TOTAL 0.97(4.8) 6.57(32.8) 1.53(7.6) 2.36(11.8) 3.61(18.0) 2.36(11.8) 2.6(13

AVG 0.09 0.65 0.15 0.23 0.36 0.23 0.26


29/48

29

The production of Polyester cloths in terms of meters by the Society units is

depicted in the table. The Annual study average of Polyester production was 2 lakh

meters. Of which Gandhiji Society registered with 0.65 lakh meters (33percent) followed

by Kamala Nehru Society18percent. The inter society comparison indicates that the

performance of Gandhiji and Kamala Nehru was found better and the maintained a higher

level than study units average. The performance of Gandhiji, Kamala Nehru and

Silambu Salver was better in the second half of the study period. In case of other

Societies, the performance was better in first half of the study period.


30/48

30

TABLE-16

TOTAL VALUE OF POLYSTER (Rs in Lakh)

YEAR ANNA GANDHIJI NAMNADU SILAMBU KAMALA SANJAY ANJUG

1997 98 5.46(10.5)

(15.8)

15.44(29.8)

(5.7)

12.15(23.4)

(4.9)

8.06(15.5)

(5.3)

1.70(3.2)

(2.0)

0.99(1.9)

(1.3)

8.00(15

(4.3)

1998 99 7.20(9.8)

(20.8)

7.57(10.3)

(2.8)

12.78(17.5)

(5.1)

13.67(18.7)

(9.1)

9.68(13.2)

(11.7)

4.01(5.4)

(5.3)

18.00(2

(9.7)

1999 00 3.08(3.5)

(8.9)

20.01(23.1)

(7.4)

13.14(15.2)

(5.3)

16.35(18.9)

(10.9)

9.02(10.4)

(10.9)

5.80(6.7)

(7.7)

19.00(2

(10.3)

2000 01 1.80(1.7)

(5.2)

20.25(20.2)

(7.5)

23.21(23.1)

(9.3)

19.00(18.9)

(12.7)

8.67(8.6)

(10.5)

7.16(7.1)

(9.5)

20.13(2

(10.9)

2001 02 2.10(2.1)

(6.0)

18.03(18.0)

(6.6)

24.20(24.2)

(9.7)

17.35(17.3)

(11.6)

8.82(8.8)

(10.7)

9.10(9.1)

(12.0)

20.31(2

(11.0)2002 03 2.40(2.6)

(6.9)

13.10(14.6)

(4.8)

28.18(31.5)

(11.4)

12.24(13.7)

(8.1)

6.27(7.0)

(7.6)

9.10(10.1)

(12.0)

18.02(2

(9.7)

2003 04 3.50(2.6)

(10.1)

50.03(37.7)

(18.5)

30.24(22.7)

(12.2)

12.73(9.5)

(8.5)

8.13(6.1)

(9.9)

9.04(6.8)

(12.0)

19.00(1

(10.3)

2004 05 2.90(2.1)

(8.3)

45.03(33.7)

(16.7)

33.00(24.6)

(13.3)

16.00(11.9)

(10.7)

9.48(7.0)

(11.5)

7.18(5.3)

(9.5)

20.03(1

(10.8)

2005 06 3.50(2.4)

(10.1)

40.07(27.7)

(14.8)

35.21(24.4)

(14.2)

16.02(11.1)

(10.7)

10.96(7.5)

(13.3)

17.13(11.8)

(22.7)

21.41(1

(11.6)

2006 07 2.60(1.9)

(7.5)

40.00(30.5)

(14.8)

35.02(26.7)

(14.1)

18.03(13.7)

(12.0)

9.34(7.1)

(11.3)

5.80(4.4)

(7.7)

20.00(1

(10.8)

TOTAL 34.54(3.3) 269.53(25.8) 247.13(23.7) 149.45(14.3) 82.07(7.8) 75.31(7.2) 183.9(1

AVG 3.45 26.9 24.7 14.9 8.20 7.5 18.3


31/48

31

The value of Polyester cloth produced by the study units is indicated in table16. It

is found that all the study units together has produced Rs1041 lakh and the annual

average being 104.1 lakh the. Here also, the high performance was found with Gandhiji

Society with 26percent, followed of Namnadu with 26percent followed of Namnadu with

24percent. Here also, the Anna society performance was at lagging behind. The inter

society comparison indicates that the performance of Gandhiji, Namnadu, Anjugam, was

found to be better in all the ten years as the maintain higher than Societies average.

The performance of Silambu Salver was found to be better in the first half of five Years

of the study period as they maintained higher than the Societies average in all other

Society. In the rest of the Societies the performance was lower than the Societies

Average. Gandhiji society has performance in the year 2003 04 by producing 50 lakh

Polyester which constituted 38percent among all the regard in witnessed a case of Sanjay

1997 98.


32/48

32

TABLE-17

TOTAL VOLUME OF ARTSILK (In Lakh Meters)


1997 98 0.17(9.6.)

(9.2)

0.35(19.7)

(5.3)

0.11(6.2)

(5.5)

0.58(32.7)

(71.6)

0.09(5.0)

(2.4)

0.21(11.8)

(6.8)

0.26(1

(8.4)

1998 99 0.12(4.8)

(6.5)

0.72(28.9)

(11.0)

0.16(6.4)

(8.0)

0.41(16.4)

(12.4)

0.37(14.8)

(10.1)

0.10(4.0)

(3.2)

0.61(2

(19.7)

1999 00 0.10(4.4)

(5.4)

0.51(22.5)

(7.8)

0.19(8.4)

(9.5)

0.35(15.4)

(10.6)

0.65(28.7)

(17.9)

0.11(4.8)

(3.6)

0.35(1

(11.3)

2000 01 0.12(6.2)

(6.5)

0.60(13.2)

(9.2)

0.23(11.9)

(11.5)

0.29(15.1)

(22.4)

0.21(10.9)

(5.7)

0.17(8.8)

(5.5)

0.30(1

(9.7)

2001 02 0.11(4.7)

(6.0)

0.35(15.0)

(5.3)

0.30(12.8)

(15.0)

0.31(13.3)

(9.4)

0.29(12.4)

(7.9)

0.69(29.6)

(22.6)

0.28(1

(9.0)

2002 03 0.13(6.1)

(7.1)

0.59(27.9)

(9.0)

0.45(21.3)

(22.6)

0.21(9.9)

(6.3)

0.31(14.6)

(8.5)

0.22(10.4)

(7.2)

0.20(9

(6.4)

2003 04 0.10(4.9)

(5.4)

0.56(27.8)

(8.6)

0.27(13.4)

(13.5)

0.22(10.9)

(6.6)

0.46(22.8)

(12.6)

0.17(8.4)

(5.5)

0.23(1

(7.4)

2004 05 0.24(12.3)

(13.1)

0.43(22.1)

(6.6)

0.16(8.2)

(8.0)

0.29(14.9)

(8.8)

0.26(13.4)

(7.1)

0.30(15.4)

(9.8)

0.26(1

(8.4)

2005 06 0.29(8.2)

(15.8)

1.45(41.1)

(22.2)

0.09(2.5)

(4.5)

0.31(8.8)

(9.4)

0.71(20.1)

(19.5)

0.35(9.9)

(11.4)

0.32(9

(10.3)

2006 07 0.45(14.8)

(24.5)

0.95(31.2)

(14.5)

0.03(0.98)

(1.5)

0.32(10.5)

(9.7)

0.28(9.2)

(7.7)

0.73(24.0)

(23.9)

0.28(9

(9.0)

TOTAL 1.83(7.8) 6.51(27.8) 1.99(8.5) 3.29(14.0) 3.63(15.5) 3.05(13.0) 3.09(1AVG 0.18 0.65 0.19 0.32 0.36 0.30 0.30


33/48

33

The production of Art silk items is discussed in table17. It is a found the study

average was 2.33 lakh meters were produced by the weavers Cooperatives together. The

Society wise performance indicates that Gandhiji Society constituted 28percent. In the

total production of Kamala Nehru constituted 16percent and Silambu with 14 percent.

The least production of Art silk variety was witnessed in Anna Society with 7.8percent.

The total annual production shows a fluctuating trend from 1.77 lakh meters in the initial

study period to 8.52 lakh meters in 2005 - 06. The comparison of production of Art silk

among the societies indicates that Gandhiji Society has excelled in all the years of the

study period. The performance of Silambu, Kamala Nehru, and Anjugam Society

indicates a better performance during the first half of the study period. The highest

production in a particular year was found with 2005 06. In case of Gandhiji Society

with 41percent. Among the Societies and the least performance was noticed in the

Kamala Nehru in 1997 98 with 0.09 lakh meters.


34/48

34

TABLE-18

TOTAL VALUE OF ARTSILK (Rs in Lakh)


1997 98 6.93(13.2)

(11.4)

14.00(26.7)

(4.7)

3.04(5.80)

(3.9)

8.68(16.5)

(5.9)

10.27(19.6)

(12.2)

1.00(1.9)

(0.7)

8.41(16

(12.4)

1998 99 5.12(4.8)

(8.4)

48.00(45.1)

(16.1)

3.20(3.0)

(4.1)

13.68(12.8)

(9.4)

9.42(8.8)

(11.1)

4.89(4.5)

(3.5)

22.00(2

(13.1)

1999 00 2.80(3.4)

(4.6)

25.00(30.3)

(8.4)

2.70(3.2)

(3.4)

16.37(19.8)

(11.2)

7.17(8.7)

(8.5)

6.00(7.2)

(4.4)

22.31(2

(13.3)

2000 01 3.40(4.2)

(5.6)

23.41(28.9)

(7.8)

3.01(3.7)

(3.8)

16.00(19.7)

(11.0)

5.91(7.3)

(7.0)

6.18(7.6)

(4.5)

23.02(2

(13.7)

2001 02 3.60(4.5)

(5.9)

18.33(23.3)

(6.1)

9.43(11.9)

(12.1)

17.35(22.0)

(11.9)

6.48(8.2)

(7.7)

10.18(12.9)

(7.4)

13.23(1

(7.8)

2002 03 3.21(4.1)

(5.3)

18.20(23.5)

(6.1)

11.05(14.3)

(14.2)

12.05(15.6)

(8.2)

7.46(9.6)

(8.8)

11.78(15.2)

(8.6)

13.45(1

(8.0)

2003 04 4.50(4.5)

(7.4)

38.02(38.4)

(12.8)

10.35(10.4)

(13.3)

12.74(12.8)

(8.7)

9.21(9.3)

(10.9)

8.95(9.0)

(6.5)

15.00(1

(8.9)

2004 05 10.06(7.6)

(16.6)

40.05(30.5)

(13.4)

11.00(8.4)

(14.1)

16.01(12.2)

(11.0)

8.64(6.5)

(10.2)

29.16(22.2)

(21.4)

16.00(1

(9.5)

2005 06 9.60(7.9)

(15.8)

38.04(31.5)

(12.8)

10.50(8.7)

(13.5)

15.03(12.4)

(10.3)

11.14(9.2)

(13.2)

18.88(15.6)

(13.8)

17.21(1

(10.2)

2006 07 11.18(7.9)

(18.5)

33.68(23.9)

(11.3)

13.40(9.5)

(17.2)

17.53(12.4)

(12.0)

8.42(5.9)

(10.0)

39.12(27.8)

(28.7)

17.10(1

(10.1)TOTAL 60.4(6.2) 296.73(30.6) 77.68(8.0) 145.44(15.0) 84.12(8.6) 136.14(14) 167.73(

AVG 6.04 29.6 7.76 14.5 8.4 13.6 16.7


35/48

35

Value of Art silk is given in table18. The study units together have produced Art

silk for worth of 968.24 lakh and study average being Rs.96.8 lakh Gandhiji Society has

contributed to 31percent of the value of Art silk followed by Anjugam Society 17percent

with the total value of production, Art silk was found to be better in the second of half of

the study period. Anna Society was poor in this performance. As it contributed only

6percent. The inter comparisons among the study units ravels that Gandhiji, Anjugam

and Silambu found to be better.


36/48

36

TABLE-19

TOTAL VOLUME OF CORA COTTON (In Lakh Meters)

YEAR ANNA GANDHIJI NAMNADU SILAMBU KAMALA SANJAY ANJUGA

1997 98 - 0.65(35.1)

(9.8)

0.28(15.1)

(6.8)

0.25(13.5)

(8.0)

0.11(5.9)

(1.8)

0.26(14.0)

(9.8)

0.30(16.2

(8.9)

1998 99 - 0.75(29.6)

(11.3)

0.13(5.1)

(3.2)

0.50(19.7)

(16.0)

0.52(20.5)

(8.8)

0.13(5.1)

(4.9)

0.50(19.7

(14.9)

1999 00 0.18(5.9)

(9.6)

0.74(24.5)

(11.2)

0.38(12.5)

(9.3)

0.35(11.5)

(11.2)

0.70(23.1)

(11.8)

0.14(4.6)

(5.3)

0.53(17.5

(15.8)

2000 01 0.21(7.0)

(11.2)

0.46(15.4)

(6.9)

0.73(24.5)

(17.9)

0.29(9.7)

(9.3)

0.68(22.8)

(11.5)

0.10(3.3)

(3.7)

0.50(16.8

(14.9)

2001 02 0.23(7.1)(12.2)

0.57(17.7)(8.6)

0.73(22.6)(17.9)

0.33(10.2)(10.6)

0.79(24.5)(13.3)

0.31(9.6)(11.7)

0.26(8.0)(7.7)

2002 03 0.21(11.3)

(11.2)

0.18(9.7)

(2.7)

0.45(24.3)

(11.0)

0.20(10.8)

(6.4)

0.44(23.7)

(7.4)

0.20(10.8)

(7.5)

0.17(9.1)

(5.0)

2003 04 0.18(6.2)

(9.6)

0.56(19.4)

(8.4)

0.55(19.0)

(13.5)

0.22(7.6)

(7.0)

0.91(31.5)

(15.4)

0.26(9.0)

(9.8)

0.20(6.9)

(5.9)

2004 05 0.25(9.0)

(13.3)

1.00(36.1)

(15.1)

0.25(9.0)

(6.1)

0.32(11.5)

(10.2)

0.51(18.4)

(8.6)

0.19(6.8)

(7.1)

0.25(9.0)

(7.4)

2005 06 0.29(9.6)

(15.5)

0.65(21.7)

(9.8)

0.11(3.6)

(2.7)

0.32(10.7)

(10.2)

0.78(26.0)

(13.2)

0.53(17.7)

(20.0)

0.31(10.3

(9.2)

2006 07 0.32(9.3)

(17.1)

1.04(30.2)

(15.7)

0.45(13.0)

(11.0)

0.33(9.5)

(10.6)

0.46(13.3)

(7.7)

0.52(15.1)

(19.6)

0.32(9.3)

(9.5)

TOTAL 1.87(6.7) 6.6(23.9) 4.06(14.7) 3.11(11.3) 5.9(21.4) 2.64(9.5) 3.34(12.1

AVG 0.18 0.66 0.40 0.31 0.59 0.26 0.33.


37/48

37

The volume of production of Cora Cotton is described in table 19. The total

production of the study period was 27.5 lakh meters. The Annual study average was 2.7

lakh meters. In this category also, Gandhiji society play a reading role by contributing

24percent followed by Kamala Nehru Society 21.4percent to total production. The

Annual total production shows a fluctuating trend ranging from 1.85 lakh meters in the

beginning study period to 3.44 lakh meters in the end of the study period. The Annual

inter comparison among the study units shows that the Gandhiji Society and Kamala

Nehru have performed better and they had higher level annual production of study units

average. The period wise performance indicates that the performance in the middle of

the Years 2003 05 at end of the study period. (9th

or 10th

year of the study period).


38/48

38

TABLE-20

TOTAL VALUE OF CORA COTTON (Rs in Lakh)


1997 98

-

17.44(27.4)

(5.0)

11.00(17.3)

(7.8)

9.67(15.2)

(6.5)

14.73(23.1)

(10.2)

1.18(1.8)

(1.1)

9.50(14

(8.2)

1998 99 - 45.00(39.1)

(13.0)

17.00(14.8)

(12.2)

13.67(11.9)

(9.2)

13.88(12.0)

(9.6)

7.10(6.1)

(6.9)

18.15(1

(15.8)

1999 00 4.01(4.8)

(4.8)

24.01(29.2)

(6.9)

7.05(8.5)

(5.0)

16.36(19.9)

(11.0)

11.95(14.5)

(8.3)

6.20(7.5)

(6.0)

12.53(1

(10.9)

2000 01 5.23(5.8)

(6.3)

24.32(27.2)

(7.0)

11.12(12.4)

(7.9)

17.01(19.0)

(11.4)

9.94(11.1)

(6.9)

6.66(7.4)

(6.4)

15.00(1

(13.0)

2001 02 6.10(5.6)(7.4)

30.43(28.1)(8.8)

15.34(14.1)(11.0)

17.35(16.0)(11.6)

11.17(10.3)(7.7)

8.71(8.0)(8.4)

19.00(1(16.5)

2002 03 5.86(6.4)

(7.1)

31.30(34.2)

(9.0)

13.09(14.3)

(9.3)

12.00(13.1)

(8.0)

13.77(15.0)

(9.6)

9.12(9.9)

(8.8)

6.35(6.9

(5.5)

2003 04 6.88(6.5)

(8.3)

37.05(35.3)

(10.7)

14.67(13.9)

(10.5)

12.71(12.1)

(8.5)

13.64(13.0)

(9.5)

12.13(11.5)

(11.7)

7.80(7.4

(6.7)

2004 05 10.40(8.3)

(12.6)

50.03(40.2)

(14.5)

16.72(13.4)

(12.0)

16.00(12.8)

(10.7)

16.79(13.4)

(11.7)

6.15(4.9)

(5.9)

8.30(6.6

(7.2)

2005 06 20.20(14.8)

(24.5)

35.00(25.7)

(10.1)

17.10(12.5)

(12.2)

17.02(12.5)

(11.4)

14.50(10.6)

(9.7)

23.15(17.0)

(22.5)

9.13(6.7

(7.9)

2006 07 23.60(14.6)

(28.6)

50.32(31.2)

(14.5)

16.17(10.0)

(11.6)

16.51(10.2)

(11.1)

23.03(14.2)

(16.0)

22.46(13.9)

(21.8)

9.00(5.5

(9.8)

TOTAL 82.28(7.6) 344.9(32.0) 139.26(12.9) 148.3(13.7) 143.4(13.3) 102.86(9.5) 114.76(

AVG 8.2 34.4 13.9 14.8 14.3 10.2 11.4


39/48

39

The value of Cora Cotton production indicates that in the first half the study

period it was fluctuating. The total production of the study period was 1075 lakh and

average being 107 lakh. The Gandhiji Society has contributed 32percent. Of the total

percentage, rank first Silambu Salver 14percent. It is indicated here that a Gandhiji

Society has contributed 24percent of production in quantity, has resulted in 32percent of

these values with 8percent increase in value. But in case of Kamala Nehru which has

production in 21percent quantity has contributed 13percent. In value resulting in

8percent in the value. The performance of Gandhiji and Silambu Salver found to be

better among all study units and Anna Society and Sanjay were the week performance

Society. The annual production of each Society was compared with the study average. It

indicates that the Gandhiji has put in higher percentage of production. Then the study

average. The performance of Anjugam and Silambu Salver to be better as the maintained

higher then the study units average.


40/48

40

TABLE-21

TOTAL VOLUME OF PRODUCTION (In Lakh Meters)


1997 98 0.63(12.0)

(8.2)

1.37(26.2)

(6.9)

0.59(11.3)

(7.7)

0.92(17.6)

(10.5)

0.27(5.1)

(2.0)

0.64(12.2)

(7.9)

0.79(1

(8.7)

1998 99 0.50(7.5)

(6.5)

1.72(26.0)

(8.7)

0.42(6.3)

(5.5)

0.97(14.6)

(11.0)

1.27(19.2)

(9.6)

0.32(4.8)

(3.9)

1.40(2

(15.5)

1999 00 0.64(8.4)

(8.3)

1.65(21.6)

(8.3)

0.74(9.7)

(9.7)

1.04(13.6)

(11.8)

1.95(25.6)

(14.8)

0.36(4.7)

(4.4)

1.23(1

(13.6)

2000 01 0.57(8.5)

(7.4)

1.49(22.4)

(7.5)

1.11(16.6)

(14.6)

0.86(12.9)

(9.8)

1.26(18.9)

(9.5)

0.40(6.0)

(4.9)

0.96(1

(10.6)2001 02 0.68(8.1)

(8.8)

1.67(19.9)

(8.4)

1.22(14.5)

(16.0)

0.95(11.3)

(10.8)

1.51(18.0)

(11.4)

1.50(17.9)

(18.6)

0.84(1

(9.3)

2002 03 0.66(11.2)

(8.5)

1.36(23.0)

(6.9)

1.09(18.5)

(14.3)

0.59(10.0)

(6.7)

1.02(17.3)

(7.7)

0.60(10.1)

(7.4)

0.57(9

(6.3)

2003 04 0.56(8.0)

(7.2)

1.77(25.4)

(8.9)

0.94(13.5)

(12.4)

0.66(9.4)

(7.5)

1.75(25.1)

(13.3)

0.60(8.6)

(7.4)

0.68(9

(7.5)

2004 05 0.98(12.5)

(12.7)

2.86(36.5)

(14.5)

0.47(6.0)

(6.2)

0.87(11.1)

(9.9)

1.07(13.6)

(8.1)

0.77(9.8)

(9.5)

0.81(1

(8.9)

2005 06 1.11(11.7)

(14.4)

2.95(31.1)

(14.9)

0.35(3.6)

(4.6)

0.93(9.3)

(10.6)

1.98(20.9)

(15.0)

1.29(13.6)

(16.0)

0.86(9

(9.5)

2006 07 1.35(14.4)

(17.5)

2.84(30.4)

(14.4)

0.65(6.9)

(8.5)

0.97(10.3)

(11.0)

1.06(11.3)

(8.0)

1.57(16.8)

(19.5)

0.89(9

(9.8)

TOTAL 7.68(10.3) 19.68(26.6) 7.58(10.2) 8.76(11.8) 13.14(17.7) 8.05(10.8) 9.03(1

AVG 0.76 1.96 0.75 0.87 1.31 0.80 0.90


41/48

41

The table described the total production of the study units in terms of quantity.

The study units total production of the study period was 74 lakh meters. The Gandhiji

Society has contributed to 27percent of the total production followed by Kamala Nehru

Society with 18percent. The Namnadu and Anna Society have contributed lower rate

with10percent each of total production. The year wise total production of the study units

shows a fluctuating trend ranging from 5.21 lakh meters to 9.47 lakh meters, in the first

and 9th

Year of the study period. The production performance of the study units was

compared and found that Gandhiji, Kamala Society found to be a better from functioning.

The each societys performance was compared with a study units average. It reveals that

the Gandhiji and Kamala Nehru have maintained a higher rate of production in almost all

the years over the study units average.


42/48

42

TABLE-22

TOTAL VALUE OF PRODUCTION (Rs in Lakh)


1997 98 23.45(13.1)

(6.8)

46.88(26.2)

(5.1)

26.19(14.6)

(5.6)

26.41(14.7)

(5.9)

26.70(14.9)

(8.6)

3.17(1.7)

(1.0)

25.91(

(5.5)

1998 99 22.21(7.3)

(6.5)

100.57(33.0)

(11.0)

32.98(10.8)

(7.1)

41.02(13.4)

(9.2)

32.98(10.8)

(10.6)

16.00(5.2)

(5.0)

58.15(

(12.4)

1999 00 20.64(7.8)

(6.05)

69.02(26.3)

(7.5)

22.89(8.7)

(4.9)

49.08(18.7)

(11.0)

28.14(10.7)

(9.0)

18.00(6.8)

(5.7)

53.84(2

(11.5)

2000 01 18.39(6.6)

(5.3)

67.96(24.4)

(7.4)

37.34(13.4)

(8.0)

52.01(18.6)

(11.7)

24.52(8.8)

(7.9)

20.00(7.1)

(6.3)

58.15(2

(12.4)

2001 02 25.87(8.6)

(7.5)

66.79(22.2)

(7.3)

48.97(16.2)

(10.5)

52.05(17.3)

(11.7)

26.47(8.8)

(8.5)

27.99(9.3)

(8.9)

52.54(

(11.2)

2002 03 22.87(8.4)

(6.7)

62.60(23.2)

(6.8)

52.32(19.4)

(11.2)

36.29(13.4)

(8.1)

27.50(10.2)

(8.8)

30.00(11.1)

(9.5)

37.82(

(8.1)

2003 04 28.33(8.0)

(8.3)

125.10(35.7)

(13.7)

55.26(15.7)

(11.9)

38.18(10.9)

(8.6)

30.98(8.8)

(10.0)

30.12(8.6)

(9.5)

41.80(

(8.9)

2004 05 50.96(12.2)

(14.9)

135.11(32.4)

(14.8)

60.72(14.5)

(13.0)

48.01(11.5)

(10.8)

34.91(8.3)

(11.2)

42.49(10.2)

(13.5)

44.33(

(9.5)

2005 06 61.40(14.3)

(18.0)

113.11(26.3)

(12.4)

62.81(14.6)

(13.5)

48.07(11.2)

(10.8)

36.60(8.5)

(11.8)

59.16(13.7)

(18.8)

47.75(

(10.2)

2006 07 66.88(14.4)

(19.6)

124.00(26.8)

(13.6)

64.59(13.9)

(13.9)

52.07(11.2)

(11.7)

40.79(8.8)

(13.1)

67.38(14.5)

(21.4)

46.10(9

(9.8)

TOTAL 341(10.4) 911.14(28.0) 464.07(14.2) 443.19(13.6) 309.59(9.5) 314.31(9.6) 466.39AVG 34.1 91.1 46.4 44.3 30.9 31.4 46.6


43/48

43

It is very clear from the table, the study units Annual total production shows a

fluctuating trend. However there was steady increase in the second half of the study

period. The total production of the study period was Rs3249.6 lakh and the average being

324.9 lakh. Of the total value of production, Gandhiji Society has contributed to

28percent and Anjugam as contributed 14.3 and Namnadu 14.2percent. The least

performance was indicated by the Kamala Nehru Society. The performance study unit

indicates that Gandhiji and Anjugam found to be better. When comparing the year wise

production of each Society with the study units average, revels that the maintained a

higher percent than the study units average. The highest single Year production was

found with Gandhiji Society with 32percent in 2004 05 and. The least was found with

Anna Society with 18.3percent in 2000 -01.


44/48

44

Chapter 3

Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Suggestions

The important findings of the study are summarized as follows. The findings are

described in the order namely.

i) Production performance by society wiseii) Production performance variety wiseiii)Total production of the study units in totals.

(i) Production performance by Societies Performance

1) In case of Anna society the high production in quantity and value was witnessedin 2006-07 with 1.35 lakh meters Rs.66.88 lakh respectively. The low production in

meters was found in 1998-99 with 0.50 lakh meters and low value was found in 2000-

01 with Rs.18.39 lakh.

2) In case of Gandhiji society the high performance in production quantity was foundin 2005-06 with 2.95 lakh meters and value was in 2004-05 with Rs.135.11 lakh. The

low performance in terms of quantity and value was found in 2002-03 with Rs.1.36 lakh

meters and the amount in 1997-98 with Rs.46.88 lakh respectively.

3) In case of Namnadu society the high production was witnessed in terms ofquantity in 2001-02 with 1.22 lakh meters and in terms of value found in 2006-07 with

64.59 lakh. The low production Performance was witnessed in 2005-06 with 0.35 lakh

meters and Rs.22.89 lakh in 1999-2000.

4) In case of Silambu salver the high production was witnessed in 1999-2000 with1.04 lakh meters and in 2006-07 with Rs.52.07 lakh. The low production was

witnessed in 2002-03 with 0.59 lakh meters and in 1997-98 with Rs.26.41 lakh.

5) In case of Kamala Nehru Society high production was witnessed in 2005-06 with1.98 lakh meters and in 2006-07 with Rs.40.79 lakh. The low production was found in

1997-98 with 0.27 lakh meters and in 2000-01 with Rs.27.52 lakh.

6) In case of Sanjay the high production was noticed in 2006-07 with 1.57 lakhmeters and Rs.67.38 lakh. The low production was found in 1997-98 with 0.32 lakh

meters and Rs.3.17 lakh.

7) In case of Anjugam society the high production was found in 1998-99 both interms of quantity 1.4 lakh meters and value with Rs.58.15 lakh respectively. The low

Performance was found in 2002-03 with 0.57 lakh meters and value Rs.25.91 lakh in

1997-98.


45/48

45

(ii) Production Performance Variety Wise

1.Polyester: The high production of Polyester cloth was made by the Gandhiji societywith 33% and the low level was found with the Anna Society 4.8%.

In terms of value also Gandhiji society was found to have high polyester production

25.8% and the low was found with Anna Society with 3.3%.

2.Art silk: In case of Art silk cloth production, it was the Gandhiji society which had

higher 27.8% followed by Anna society with 7.8%.

In terms of value also Gandhiji Society found to have high 30.6% followed by

Anna Society with 6.2%.

3. Cora Cotton: In case of Cora cotton variety the Gandhiji society was found to have

high production with 23.9% and the low level was found with Anna Society with 6.7%

In terms of value also Gandhiji Society was found to be high share with 23.9%

and Anna Society was found to be low share with 6.7%.

(iii) The Total Production Performance

1. The total production performance in terms of quantity indicated that GandhijiSociety took a lead role by covering 26.6% of the total production. The low level

of production was witnessed in case of Namnadu Society with 10.2%.

2. The value of the total production shows that Gandhiji Society again found to betaking leading role by constituting 28% and low level was witness in case of

Kamala with 9.5%.


46/48

46

Suggestions

Based on the findings of the study, few suggestions are made for effective

production of the societies:

1. To strengthen the production performance more effectively, the study units needto develop infrastructure facilities such as dyeing, bleaching, printing, installation

system. This would definitely enhance production function and performance.

2. Generally, the primary cooperative weavers societies have no mechanism totrace the tastes, preferences and desires of consumers market. Therefore the

societies must understand attitude of the consumers, and must pay more attention

on new products, design and development, quality production etc.,

3. Handloom cooperatives must think of next phase of cloths and its features. Onesuch is Natural dying clothes, it has greater demand in some states, and such

varieties were found more useful in consumers point of view. Handloom

Cooperatives can think of making such cloth items to attract consumers.

4. There must be effective coordination among handloom cooperatives especially inthe areas of technology, methods of training, enhancing ambience and outlook

etc.,

Conclusion

The Gandhiji society has better performance in their production function both in

terms of volume and value. The low production performance was witnessed with Anna

society in terms of volume; and Kamala Nehru society in terms of value.

In terms of variety wise production performance, it is the Gandhiji society has

excelled both in volume and value in all the three categories and Anna society found to be

weak in both volume and value in all the three categories.


47/48

47

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books

1. Johns. Biegel, 1987, Production Control, A Quantitative Approach Hall of IndiaPvt. Ltd, New Delhi

2. N. Kumar, R. Mittal, Production Management, Anmol Publications Pvt.Ltd, NewDelhi

3. J.G Sinha, V.N. Mugali, Business Management R. Chand and Co Publisher, NewDelhi

4. Nakkiran, A Treatise on Cooperative Management, Rainbow Publication,Coimbatore

5. Hono Johnnsen, International Dictionary of Management Over 5000 entries,An invaluable book; the times, London.

Thesis

1. Joseph Nelson, (2001), is marketing strategies of Handloom Weavers CooperativeSocieties an Assessment, No.101, April.

2. Financial Performance of handloom Weavers Cooperative Society in DindigulDistrict, No.177, April

3. Booma Devi, (2002) A Survey of knowledge on Cooperative society of membersof Dindigul District, No. 5796, March.

4. Murugesan .M, (1990), A Comparative study of Primary Handloom WeaversCooperative Production and sale societies in Salem District, April.


48/48

Production Performance

Documents

Transcript of Production Performance