Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the...
-
Upload
aaron-courage -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Production of a multi-model, convective- scale superensemble over western Europe as part of the...
Production of a multi-model, convective-
scale superensemble over western Europe
as part of the SESAR project
PHY-EPS Workshop, June 19th, 2013
Jeffrey Beck, F. Bouttier,
O. Nuissier, and L. Raynaud*
CNRM-GAME
*GMAP/RECYF
Météo-France/CNRS
European Convective-Scale EPS
Transition toward convection-resolving ensembles (e.g.): France: PEArome (2.5 km, 12 members, 24-hour forecasts) – Pre-Op UK: MOGREPS-UK (2.2 km, 12 members, 24-hour forecasts) – Pre-
Op Germany: COSMO-DE (2.8 km, 20 members, 21-hour forecasts) – Op Others?
Computational resources focused toward high-resolution representation of small-scale features (e.g., extreme events, fog), but creates limitations: Number of members and therefore ensemble sampling/performance is
restricted Size of domain and forecast duration also constraints
Potential solution is to combine multiple national models in a “super”-ensemble
Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR)
Collaborative project to overhaul European airspace and Air Traffic Management (ATM)
Goal is to unify ATM over EU states, similar to NextGen ATM program in the USA
Key necessity: Continent-wide convective-scale modeling for aviation hazards with ensemble (probabilistic) forecasts
Within the context of the SESAR project, an experimental version of a superensemble is being created (operational in several years)
http://www.sesarju.eu
Regional Model Domains
MOGREPS + AROME =
24 members
COSMO +
AROME = 32
members
Uniform resolution, grid, and forecasts required in order to merge individual models from Met Office, Météo-France, and DWD: 0.022° lat x 0.027° lon grid, ~2.2 km resolution Slightly adjusted (interpolated) domains allowing for collocated grid points Hourly forecasts out to 21 hours (00Z or 03Z initialization)
Parameters collected: 10-m variables, pressure level temperature, wind, and hydrometeor content,
plus total surface accumulated precip since initialization Derived variables: simulated reflectivity, echotop, and VIL for hazardous
weather forecasting
Preliminary dataset collected during convective events between July and August 2012 (42 days)
Model Specifics for Superensemble
Calculate simulated reflectivity at each grid point using rain, snow, and hail hydrometeor mixing ratios
Find upper-most pressure level with 18 dBZ = Echotop
Integrate reflectivity factor for column above grid point to derive vertically integrated liquid (VIL) for hail detection (Z D∝ 6)
Initial Superensemble Derived Variables
z
x
Echotop ~ 18 dBZ
VIL = kg m-2
850 mb Simulated Reflectivity
Sim. Ref. Example (AROME and COSMO)
MOGREPS + AROME =
24 members
Model overlap region
15/8/2012 – 18 UTC
850 mb simulated reflectivity ensemble mean (dBZ)
Sim. Ref. Example (AROME and COSMO)
MOGREPS + AROME =
24 members
15/8/2012 – 18 UTC
850 mb simulated reflectivity ensemble spread is qualitatively similar in single domain and overlap regions
Sim. Ref. Animation (AROME and COSMO)
850 mb simulated reflectivity
21-hr simulation from 03Z 5/8/2012 to 00Z 5/9/2012
Echotop Example (AROME and COSMO)
MOGREPS + AROME =
24 members
Echotop (in mb) defined using 18 dBZ
Warm colors indicate lower cloud tops
Echotop Example (AROME and COSMO)
MOGREPS + AROME =
24 members
Echotop ensemble spread (mb)
Warmer colors indicate more spread
Similar spread in overlap regions
Echotop Animation (AROME and COSMO)
Echotop (mb) 21-hr simulation from
03Z 5/8/2012 to 00Z 5/9/2012
Superensemble Challenges
How to interpret output: Initial focus is to meet SESAR deliverables with regard to aviation hazards:
Strong convection, echotop, hail threat (VIL), turbulence, upper-level variables
Use of quantiles, ensemble spread, and probability in both overlap and single model regions
Identify potential inconsistencies and biases when merging ensembles Currently employ a linear decrease in member weight < 50 km from boundary
Point data versus different types of objective analysis smoothing
weight
x or y
Model 2 (red)Model 1 (black)w=1
w=0
PDF = { wi xi } for all members “I”
Impact of spatialization method on reflectivity quantiles
Methods to derive a PDF at a given point x:● m1 'point': use member values at point x
m2 'square': equiprobable values in square around xm3 'circle': like m2, in circle centered around xm4 'cone': use values in disk, with decreasing weight as
●
●
●
distance to x increases.
Notes:● size of square or circle is uniform (here: circle radius = 12 km,square with same area)● 12-member Arome ensemble
Impact of Spatialization on Mean
point circle
square cone
Future Work
Incorporation of other data: Add MOGREPS-UK (“the data are in the mail”) Produce and derive other variables of interest, both for SESAR and for
ensemble modeling research purposes Other countries interested in participation?
Analyse and verify data: Inter-comparison between models in overlap zones (score analyses) Rain gauge and surface based observations for precipitation total and 10-m
forecast variables Validation of probabilistic products using 3D archived radar data from the
French ARAMIS radar network Verification to show impact/benefit of increased ensemble sampling
Thank You
Questions, comments, or suggestions welcome!