PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White...
-
Upload
ronald-harrell -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White...
![Page 1: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PROCEDURAL CONTROL
EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN
RESPONSES
Lynn WhiteJamie Moon
![Page 2: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PURPOSE
• Procedural control
• Anticipatory Responses
• Post-stimulus Responses
• Subjective vs. objective responses
![Page 3: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
• Real and Perceived control
• Arntz & Schmidt (1989).
• Procedural control of painful electric shock
• Wiech et al. (2006)
• Procedural control of painful stimulus application
• Muller (2012)
![Page 4: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
THE PRESENT STUDY’S NICHE
• Used a painful stimulus that is less artificial
• Measured both subjective and objective responses
• Looked at the effect of procedural control on pain during the anticipatory period AND the post-needle prick period
![Page 5: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
METHODS
Participants
• 60 total• 20 men & 40 women M = 20.28, S = 2.62
• Undergraduates• Compensation & course credit
Materials
• Biopack MP36, BSL pro software• Sure Comfort Lancets• Alcohol wipes, medical tape, gloves, Band-Aids and Cotton balls.
![Page 6: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Procedure
• Informed consent• Hook up to biofeedback• Baseline• Anticipatory• Questionnaire• Stimulus• Post Stimulus• Questionnaire
baseline
anticipatory
post
![Page 7: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2 way mixed ANOVAshowed a significantmain effect of timeF(1.21,70.22)=116.64, p=.000, partial eta squared = .668
Skin conductance increased significantlyfrom baseline to theanticipatory period tothe post-stimulus period
All other effects were n.s.
base
...
antic
i...
post
-s...
02468
101214161820
Skin Conductance Before and After Noxious Stimulation
PC
NPC
mea
n S
C (
mic
rose
imen
s)
![Page 8: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2 way mixed ANOVAshowed no significantmain effect of time,procedural control, or Interaction effect.
Perceived pain intensitywas unaffected by timeor procedural control.
1 22.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
Pain Intensity Before and After Noxious Stimulation
PC
NPC
mea
n p
ain
in
ten
sity
sco
re
anticipatory post-stimulus
![Page 9: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2 way mixed ANOVAshowed no significantmain effect of time,procedural control, or Interaction effect.
Perceived unpleasantnesswas unaffected by timeor procedural control.
1 22.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
Unpleasantness Before and After Noxious Stimulation
PC
NPC
mea
n u
np
leas
antn
ess
scor
e
anticipatory post-stimulus
![Page 10: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2 way mixed ANOVAshowed a significantmain effect of timeF(1,58)=26.49, p=.000, partial eta squared= .314
Anxiety levels decreasedsignificantly from theanticipatory period tothe post-stimulus period
All other effects were n.s.
anticipatory post-stimulus0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Anxiety Before and After Nox-ious Stimulation
PC
NPC
mea
n a
nxi
ety
scor
e
![Page 11: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CONCLUSIONSSkin
conductance
• Skin conductance levels increased over time
Pain• Pain levels
were not affected
Unpleasantness
• Unpleasantness levels were not affected
Anxiety
• Anxiety levels decreased over time
No effect of procedural control?
![Page 12: PROCEDURAL CONTROL EFFECT ON ANTICIPATORY AND POST-STIMULUS ANXIETY AND PAIN RESPONSES Lynn White Jamie Moon.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051417/5697bfd61a28abf838cadcb1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
QUESTIONS?