Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics · Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics...
Transcript of Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics · Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics...
Probabilistic Perspectives on ClimateDynamics
Adam [email protected]
School of Earth and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Victoria
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 1/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect,
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 2/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
“Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.”- Robert A. Heinlein
⇒ “expectation” lies at heart of notion of climate
⇒ this is a fundamentally probabilistic perspective
The ultimate goal of climate physics is the “measure” of the climatesystem, with emphasis on
characterisation
physical understanding
predictability(evolution of trajectory and response of measure to forcing)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 3/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Probability and Climate
Toward this end, a natural language of climate physics is
dynamical systems
stochastic processes
random dynamical systems (where they meet)
Triple goals of probabilistic climate dynamics:
1. characterise distributions of climate states
2. understand how these distributions arise from the underlyingphysics
3. use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 4/63
Overview
Why is climate complex?
Origins of stochasticity in the climate system.
Case Study I: Stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds.
Case Study II: Stochastic dynamics of El Nino/Southern Oscillation.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 5/63
Overview
Why is climate complex?
Origins of stochasticity in the climate system.
Case Study I: Stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds.
Case Study II: Stochastic dynamics of El Nino/Southern Oscillation.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 5/63
Overview
Why is climate complex?
Origins of stochasticity in the climate system.
Case Study I: Stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds.
Case Study II: Stochastic dynamics of El Nino/Southern Oscillation.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 5/63
Overview
Why is climate complex?
Origins of stochasticity in the climate system.
Case Study I: Stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds.
Case Study II: Stochastic dynamics of El Nino/Southern Oscillation.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 5/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
From von Storch and Zwiers, 1999Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 6/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
From von Storch and Zwiers, 1999
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 7/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Scales
Generic dynamical equation for climate state
dz
dt= Lz + N(z, z) + F
Decompose state into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y
⇒ coupled dynamics
dx
dt= Lxxx + Lxyy +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N (x)xy (x,y) +N (x)
yy (y,y) + Fx
dy
dt= Lyxx + Lyyy +N (y)
xx (x,x) +N (y)xy (x,y) +N (y)
yy (y,y) + Fy
Averaging to project on “slow” dynamics retains “upscale” influenceof eddies on resolved flow (“closure problem”)
dx
dt= Lxxx +N (x)
xx (x,x) +N(x)yy (y,y) + Fx
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 8/63
Why is Climate Complex? Coupling Across Systems
From IPCC Third Assessment Report
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 9/63
Why is Climate Complex? Feedback Loops
From http://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/ees/slides/climate/
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 10/63
Why is Climate Complex? Non-Stationarity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 11/63
Why is Climate Complex? Data Surfeit & Paucity
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
−2
−1
0
1
2
Year
Nin
o 3.
4 (° C
)
From ERA-40 Project Report Series 19
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 12/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
Climate system displays variability over broad range of space andtime scales
From Saltzman, 2002Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 13/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
When modelling slower components of system, don’t want (need?)to explicitly simulate faster components
⇒ “subgrid-scale parameterisations” (closure)
Analogy with statistical mechanics; can talk about “pressure” and“temperature” of gas without accounting for state of each molecule
Can also consider separation of scales in space; parameterisationproblem arises because of finite gridsize of operational models
Nonlinear dynamics⇒ fast dynamics has upscale effect on slow
Coarse-graining results not only in unresolved scales, but alsounresolved processes (e.g. internal gravity waves, convection, cloudmircophysics)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 14/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
State of unresolved processes/scales conditioned on resolved scalesnot unique: adopt distributional perspective on subgrid-scale
Formally decompose climate state z into slow and fast variables x
and y (resp. “climate” and “weather”):
dx
dt= f(x,y, t)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y, t)
Obtain effective stochastic dynamics for “climate” as ε→ 0
In many (most?) climate applications, ε is not small
Fast/slow decomposition not unique;“one person’s noise is another person’s signal”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 15/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
State of unresolved processes/scales conditioned on resolved scalesnot unique: adopt distributional perspective on subgrid-scale
Formally decompose climate state z into slow and fast variables x
and y (resp. “climate” and “weather”):
dx
dt= f(x,y, t)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y, t)
Obtain effective stochastic dynamics for “climate” as ε→ 0
In many (most?) climate applications, ε is not small
Fast/slow decomposition not unique;“one person’s noise is another person’s signal”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 15/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
State of unresolved processes/scales conditioned on resolved scalesnot unique: adopt distributional perspective on subgrid-scale
Formally decompose climate state z into slow and fast variables x
and y (resp. “climate” and “weather”):
dx
dt= f(x,y, t)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y, t)
Obtain effective stochastic dynamics for “climate” as ε→ 0
In many (most?) climate applications, ε is not small
Fast/slow decomposition not unique;“one person’s noise is another person’s signal”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 15/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
State of unresolved processes/scales conditioned on resolved scalesnot unique: adopt distributional perspective on subgrid-scale
Formally decompose climate state z into slow and fast variables x
and y (resp. “climate” and “weather”):
dx
dt= f(x,y, t)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y, t)
Obtain effective stochastic dynamics for “climate” as ε→ 0
In many (most?) climate applications, ε is not small
Fast/slow decomposition not unique;“one person’s noise is another person’s signal”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 15/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Multiscale Dynamics
State of unresolved processes/scales conditioned on resolved scalesnot unique: adopt distributional perspective on subgrid-scale
Formally decompose climate state z into slow and fast variables x
and y (resp. “climate” and “weather”):
dx
dt= f(x,y, t)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y, t)
Obtain effective stochastic dynamics for “climate” as ε→ 0
In many (most?) climate applications, ε is not small
Fast/slow decomposition not unique;“one person’s noise is another person’s signal”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 15/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Origins of Stochasticity: Model Uncertainty
All models of climate (or subsystems) contain both
model error, and
poorly constrained (sometimes unphysical) parameters
Ideally: given pdf of parameters and model structure, obtain pdf ofclimate state
Reality:
full climate state pdf cannot be computed; must adoptMonte-Carlo or ensemble forecast approach in which pdf issampled; “curse of dimensionality”
parameter pdfs generally not well known a priori
Building large ensembles computationally expensive
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 16/63
Parameter Uncertainty: Ensemble Prediction
climateprediction.net uses idle private CPUs to integrateensembles with different parameter settings
http://www.climateprediction.net
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 17/63
Initial Condition Uncertainty: Ensemble Forecasting
Model uncertainties can also include initial conditions
http://chrs.web.uci.edu/images/ensemble_large_atmo.jpg
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 18/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Stochastic Climate Models: Case Studies
Two distinct end-member approaches to modelling pdfs of climatevariables:
running fully complex general circulation models
considering physically-motivated idealised models
First approach has benefit of being more realistic, but is also muchmore complex; mechanisms are not always clear
Second approach not always quantitatively accurate, but importantfor developing understanding and elucidating mechanism
Will now consider two “idealised” stochastic models for:
stochastic dynamics of sea-surface winds
stochastic dynamics of El Niño-Southern Oscillation
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 19/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Sea Surface Winds: Why Should We Care?
Air/Sea Exchange
ocean and atmosphere interact through respective boundarylayers, exchanging momentum, energy, freshwater, and gases
fluxes depend on surface winds, in general nonlinearly
ocean currents largely driven by surface winds
Sea State
sea state important for shipping, recreation
determined by both local and remote winds
Power Generation
wind power potentially significant source of energy
generation rate scales as cube of wind speed; extreme eventsimportant
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 20/63
Vector Wind Moments
mean(U) (m/s)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
−10
−5
0
5
10
std(U) (m/s)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
0
2
4
6
8
skew(U)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
−2
−1
0
1
2
Zonal Wind
mean(V) (m/s)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
−10
−5
0
5
10
std(V) (m/s)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
0
2
4
6
8
skew(V)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350−60
−40
−20
0
20
40
60
−2
−1
0
1
2
Meridional Wind
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 21/63
Mean and Skewness of Vector Wind
Joint pdfs of mean and skew for zonal and meridional winds
−10 −5 0 5 10
−1
0
1
2
mean(U) (ms−1)
skew
(U)
0.010 0.022 0.046 0.100
−5 0 5−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
mean(V) (ms−1)
skew
(V)
0.010 0.022 0.046 0.100 0.215 0.464
(note logarithmic contour scale)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 22/63
Wind Speed Moments
mean(w) (ms−1)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
−50
0
50
2
4
6
8
10
12
std(w) (ms−1)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
−50
0
50
1
2
3
4
5
skew(w)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
−50
0
50
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 23/63
Wind Speed pdf: Weibull distribution
The pdf of wind speed w has traditionally (and empirically) beenrepresented by 2-parameter Weibull distribution:
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
w
b=2b=3.5b=7
p(w) =b
a
(wa
)b−1exp
[−(wa
)b]
a is the scale parameter (pdf centre)
b is the shape parameter (pdf tilt)
pw(w) is unimodal
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 24/63
Wind Speed pdf: Weibull distribution
The pdf of wind speed w has traditionally (and empirically) beenrepresented by 2-parameter Weibull distribution:
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
w
b=2b=3.5b=7
p(w) =b
a
(wa
)b−1exp
[−(wa
)b]
a is the scale parameter (pdf centre)
b is the shape parameter (pdf tilt)
pw(w) is unimodal
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 24/63
Wind Speed pdf: Weibull distribution
The pdf of wind speed w has traditionally (and empirically) beenrepresented by 2-parameter Weibull distribution:
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
w
b=2b=3.5b=7
p(w) =b
a
(wa
)b−1exp
[−(wa
)b]
a is the scale parameter (pdf centre)
b is the shape parameter (pdf tilt)
pw(w) is unimodal
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 24/63
Wind Speed pdf: Weibull distribution
The pdf of wind speed w has traditionally (and empirically) beenrepresented by 2-parameter Weibull distribution:
0 5 10 15 20 250
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
w
b=2b=3.5b=7
p(w) =b
a
(wa
)b−1exp
[−(wa
)b]
a is the scale parameter (pdf centre)
b is the shape parameter (pdf tilt)
pw(w) is unimodal
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 24/63
Wind Speed pdfs: Observed
Observed speed moments fall around Weibull curve
mean(w)/std(w)
skew
(w)
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.010
0.022
0.046
0.100
0.215
0.464
1.000
2.154
4.642
10.000
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 25/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Boundary Layer Dynamics
Horizontal momentum equations:
∂u
∂t+ u · ∇u = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− 1
ρ
∂(ρu′u′3)
∂z
Momentum tendency due to:
advection (transport by flow; secondary importance on dailytimescales )
pressure gradient force
Coriolis force
turbulent momentum flux (in vertical)
Integrated momentum budget for slab of thickness h:
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
1
h
(u′u′3(0)− u′u′3(h)
)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 26/63
Surface Wind Stress
Surface wind stress is turbulent momentum flux across air/seainterface:
τs = ρau′u′3(0)
where
u = along-mean wind component
v = cross-mean wind component
u = (u, v)
u3 = vertical wind component
Flux parameterised in terms of u by bulk drag formula:
τs = ρacdwu
where w =‖ u ‖ is the wind speed.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 27/63
Surface Wind Stress
Surface wind stress is turbulent momentum flux across air/seainterface:
τs = ρau′u′3(0)
where
u = along-mean wind component
v = cross-mean wind component
u = (u, v)
u3 = vertical wind component
Flux parameterised in terms of u by bulk drag formula:
τs = ρacdwu
where w =‖ u ‖ is the wind speed.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 27/63
Surface Wind Stress
Surface wind stress is turbulent momentum flux across air/seainterface:
τs = ρau′u′3(0)
where
u = along-mean wind component
v = cross-mean wind component
u = (u, v)
u3 = vertical wind component
Flux parameterised in terms of u by bulk drag formula:
τs = ρacdwu
where w =‖ u ‖ is the wind speed.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 27/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Drag Coefficient
Drag coefficient influenced by
surface roughness z0
Obukhov length L (buoyancy flux, stratification)
cd = k2
[ln
(zaz0
)− ψm
(zaL
)]−2
where
ψm is an empirical function
za is the anemometer height, typically 10 m
Surface winds modify surface wave field
⇒ z0 depends on w
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 28/63
Neutral Drag Coefficient: Observations
2 52 01 51 0500.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Large & Pond 1982
Smith 1980
Smith 1988
Yelland et al. 1998
Smith 1992
u10n (m/s)
CD
10
n
(x1
00
0)
Taylor et al. (2000) WMO/TD No. 1036Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 29/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Surface Momentum Budget
To close momentum budget, need parameterisation of turbulentmomentum flux at z = h
Use “finite-differenced” eddy viscosity:
u′u′3(h) =K
h(U− u)
⇒ Surface layer momentum budget
du
dt= −1
ρ∇p− f k× u− cd
hwu +
K
h2(U− u)
= Π− cdhwu− K
h2u
whereΠ = −1
ρ∇p− f k× u +
K
h2U
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 30/63
Mechanistic Model: SDE
Decomposing Π into mean and fluctuations:
Πu(t) = 〈Πu〉+ σW1(t)
Πv(t) = σW2(t)
where Wi is Gaussian white noise⟨Wi(t1)Wj(t2)
⟩= δijδ(t1 − t2)
we obtain stochastic differential equation
du
dt= 〈Πu〉 −
cdhwu− K
h2u+ σW1
dv
dt= −cd
hwv − K
h2v + σW2
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 31/63
Mechanistic Model: SDE
Decomposing Π into mean and fluctuations:
Πu(t) = 〈Πu〉+ σW1(t)
Πv(t) = σW2(t)
where Wi is Gaussian white noise⟨Wi(t1)Wj(t2)
⟩= δijδ(t1 − t2)
we obtain stochastic differential equation
du
dt= 〈Πu〉 −
cdhwu− K
h2u+ σW1
dv
dt= −cd
hwv − K
h2v + σW2
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 31/63
Mechanistic Model: SDE
Decomposing Π into mean and fluctuations:
Πu(t) = 〈Πu〉+ σW1(t)
Πv(t) = σW2(t)
where Wi is Gaussian white noise⟨Wi(t1)Wj(t2)
⟩= δijδ(t1 − t2)
we obtain stochastic differential equation
du
dt= 〈Πu〉 −
cdhwu− K
h2u+ σW1
dv
dt= −cd
hwv − K
h2v + σW2
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 31/63
Mechanistic Model: pdf
Solution of associated Fokker-Planck equation for stationary pdf:
puv(u, v) = N1 exp
(2
σ2
{〈Πu〉u−
K
2h2(u2 + v2)
−1
h
∫ √u2+v2
0cd(w
′)w′2 dw′})
Changing to polar coordinates and integrating over angle gives windspeed pdf:
pw(w) = NwI0
(2 〈Πu〉wσ2
)exp
(− 2
σ2
{K
2h2w2 +
1
h
∫ w
0cd(w
′)w′2 dw′})
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 32/63
Mechanistic Model: pdf
Solution of associated Fokker-Planck equation for stationary pdf:
puv(u, v) = N1 exp
(2
σ2
{〈Πu〉u−
K
2h2(u2 + v2)
−1
h
∫ √u2+v2
0cd(w
′)w′2 dw′})
Changing to polar coordinates and integrating over angle gives windspeed pdf:
pw(w) = NwI0
(2 〈Πu〉wσ2
)exp
(− 2
σ2
{K
2h2w2 +
1
h
∫ w
0cd(w
′)w′2 dw′})
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 32/63
Mechanistic Model: Predictions
0
0
1 2
3 4
5 6
6
7
7
89
10
σ (m
s−3/2
)
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
mean(u) (ms−1)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
23
4
5
6
7
89
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
std(u) (ms−1)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
−0.4
−0.3
5
−0.35
−0.3
−0.3
−0.2
5
−0.25
−0.2
−0.2
−0.1
5−0
.1−0
.05
0
0
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
skew(u)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
4 5
67
89
10
10 11
12
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
σ (m
s−3/2
)
mean(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
1.522.5
33.5
44.5
5
5.5
<Πu> (ms−2 × 10−3)
std(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
−0.2
−0.1
0.10.2
0.3
<Πu> (ms−2) × 10−3
skew(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 33/63
Mechanistic Model: Predictions
0
0
1 2
3 4
5 6
6
7
7
89
10
σ (m
s−3/2
)
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
mean(u) (ms−1)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
23
4
5
6
7
89
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
std(u) (ms−1)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
−0.4
−0.3
5
−0.35
−0.3
−0.3
−0.2
5
−0.25
−0.2
−0.2
−0.1
5−0
.1−0
.05
0
0
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
skew(u)
0 1 2 3 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
4 5
67
89
10
10 11
12
<Πu> (ms−2× 10−3)
σ (m
s−3/2
)
mean(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
1.522.5
33.5
44.5
5
5.5
<Πu> (ms−2 × 10−3)
std(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
−0.2
−0.1
0.10.2
0.3
<Πu> (ms−2) × 10−3
skew(w)
0 2 40.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 33/63
Mechanistic Model: Comparison with Observations
mean(w)/std(w)
skew
(w)
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.010
0.022
0.046
0.100
0.215
0.464
1.000
2.154
4.642
10.000ObservedWeibullModel
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 34/63
Case Study I: Conclusions
Sea surface wind pdfs characterised by relationships betweenmoments
These moment relationships reflect physical processes producingdistributions
Idealised stochastic models can be constructed from basic physicalprinciples to (qualitatively) explain physical origin of pdf structure
More accurate quantitative simulation requires a more sophisticatedmodel; qualitative utility of relatively simple model suggests itcaptures essential physics
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 35/63
Case Study I: Conclusions
Sea surface wind pdfs characterised by relationships betweenmoments
These moment relationships reflect physical processes producingdistributions
Idealised stochastic models can be constructed from basic physicalprinciples to (qualitatively) explain physical origin of pdf structure
More accurate quantitative simulation requires a more sophisticatedmodel; qualitative utility of relatively simple model suggests itcaptures essential physics
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 35/63
Case Study I: Conclusions
Sea surface wind pdfs characterised by relationships betweenmoments
These moment relationships reflect physical processes producingdistributions
Idealised stochastic models can be constructed from basic physicalprinciples to (qualitatively) explain physical origin of pdf structure
More accurate quantitative simulation requires a more sophisticatedmodel; qualitative utility of relatively simple model suggests itcaptures essential physics
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 35/63
Case Study I: Conclusions
Sea surface wind pdfs characterised by relationships betweenmoments
These moment relationships reflect physical processes producingdistributions
Idealised stochastic models can be constructed from basic physicalprinciples to (qualitatively) explain physical origin of pdf structure
More accurate quantitative simulation requires a more sophisticatedmodel; qualitative utility of relatively simple model suggests itcaptures essential physics
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 35/63
El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
ENSO is the dominant mode of climate variability on interannualtimescales, involving coupled interactions between the ocean and theatmosphere
Dynamics primarily contained in equatorial Pacific; impacts feltglobally
Skillful ENSO forecasts are believed to be primary potential sourceof skill for seasonal climate forecasting
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 36/63
El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
ENSO is the dominant mode of climate variability on interannualtimescales, involving coupled interactions between the ocean and theatmosphere
Dynamics primarily contained in equatorial Pacific; impacts feltglobally
Skillful ENSO forecasts are believed to be primary potential sourceof skill for seasonal climate forecasting
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 36/63
El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
ENSO is the dominant mode of climate variability on interannualtimescales, involving coupled interactions between the ocean and theatmosphere
Dynamics primarily contained in equatorial Pacific; impacts feltglobally
Skillful ENSO forecasts are believed to be primary potential sourceof skill for seasonal climate forecasting
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 36/63
Tropical Pacific: Mean State
From www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/nino-home.html
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 37/63
Tropical Pacific: El Niño State
From www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/nino-home.html
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 38/63
Tropical Pacific: La Niña State
From www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/nino-home.html
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 39/63
ENSO Indices: SOI and East Pacific SST
From www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/nino-home.html
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 40/63
El Niño Growth: Bjerknes’ Hypothesis
E. PacificThermoclineDepth
Temperature ofUpwelled Water
E. Pacific SST
E. Pacific SLP
(Rising Air, Precip.)
Strength ofTrade Winds
SEC andUpwelling
Bjerknes’ Hypothesis
(+)(+)
(+)
(−)
(−)
(−)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 41/63
ENSO Cycles: Delayed Oscillator Mechanism
From Chang and Battisti, Physics World, 1998.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 42/63
ENSO Irregularity: Stochastic Oscillator Mechanism
From www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/nino-home.html
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 43/63
El Niño Impacts: Northern Hemisphere Winter
From iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 44/63
ENSO Impacts: Changes in Mean Climate
Adapted from Sardeshmukh et al., J. Clim (2000)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 45/63
ENSO Impacts: Changes in Climate Variability
From Sardeshmukh et al., J. Clim (2000)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 46/63
ENSO Impacts: Extreme Events
From Bove et al., J. Clim (1998)Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 47/63
ENSO Dynamics
As a first approximation, ENSO dynamics modelled as stable lineardynamical system driven by noise:
dx
dt= Ax +B(x) ◦ W
wherex is the state vector (e.g. sea surface temperature field)
A is the linearised dynamical operator
B(x) is the noise amplitude matrix
W is a vector of independent white noise processes
For simplicity, will assume that B is state-independent (additivenoise)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 48/63
ENSO Dynamics
As a first approximation, ENSO dynamics modelled as stable lineardynamical system driven by noise:
dx
dt= Ax +B(x) ◦ W
wherex is the state vector (e.g. sea surface temperature field)
A is the linearised dynamical operator
B(x) is the noise amplitude matrix
W is a vector of independent white noise processes
For simplicity, will assume that B is state-independent (additivenoise)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 48/63
ENSO Dynamics
As a first approximation, ENSO dynamics modelled as stable lineardynamical system driven by noise:
dx
dt= Ax +B(x) ◦ W
wherex is the state vector (e.g. sea surface temperature field)
A is the linearised dynamical operator
B(x) is the noise amplitude matrix
W is a vector of independent white noise processes
For simplicity, will assume that B is state-independent (additivenoise)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 48/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
where
P (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
ENSO Dynamics
Analytic solution to SDE:
x(t) = P (t)x(0) +
∫ t
0P (t− t′)BW(t′)dt′
whereP (t) = exp(At)
Evolution of moments:
〈x(t)〉 = P (t)x(0) ;⟨x(t+ τ)x(t)T
⟩= P (τ) < x(t)x(t)T >
Assuming max(Re(eig(A)))< 0, stationary covariance
C =⟨xxT
⟩
satisfies fluctuation-dissipation relationship
AC + CAT = −BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 49/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Linearised operator A will generally be non-normal, i.e.
AAT 6= ATA
so eigenvectors of A are not orthogonal, with consequences:
eigenvectors of covariance C (EOFs) do not coincide witheigenvectors of A (dynamical modes)
perturbation norm (with metric M )
N(t) = x(t)TMx(t) = x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
may grow (by potentially large amount) over finite times eventhough asymptotically stable:
limt→∞
N(t) = 0
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 50/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals”
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Optimal Perturbations
Defining amplification factor
n(t) =x(0)TP (t)TMP (t)x(0)
x(0)TMx(0)
optimal perturbation e maximises n(t) subject to constraintx(0)TMx(0) = 1⇒ generalised eigenvalue problem:
P (t)TMP (t)e = λMe
Response to fluctuating forcing:
var(X(t)) = BT
(∫ t
0P (s)TMP (s)ds
)B
⇒ importance of projection of noise structure on “average” optimals formaintaining variance;
“stochastic optimals” Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 51/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:
i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
How are A and B determined?
1. Empirical: Linear Inverse Modelling
estimate covariances from observations and compute
A =1
τln(⟨
x(t+ τ)x(t)T⟩ ⟨
x(t)x(t)T⟩−1)
Compute B from Lyapunov equation
A⟨xxT
⟩+⟨xxT
⟩AT = −BBT
Issues:i. if x(t) not truly Markov, estimates will depend on lag τ
ii. must enforce positive-definiteness of BBT
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 52/63
LIM: Optimal Perturbations from Observations
Optimal perturbation e
Perturbation P (t)e at t = 7 months
From Penland and Sardeshmukh (1995)Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 53/63
LIM: Response to Stochastic Forcing
From Penland and Sardeshmukh (1995)Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 54/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
2. Mechanistic: Stochastic Reduction of Tangent Linear Model
Partition dynamics into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y:
dx
dt= f(x,y)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y)
Reduce coupled system to effective stochastic dynamics for x:
dx
dt= Lx +N(x,x) + S(x) ◦ W
(many ways of doing this; some formal, some ad hoc)
Linearise model around appropriate state (e.g. climatologicalmean)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 55/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
2. Mechanistic: Stochastic Reduction of Tangent Linear Model
Partition dynamics into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y:
dx
dt= f(x,y)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y)
Reduce coupled system to effective stochastic dynamics for x:
dx
dt= Lx +N(x,x) + S(x) ◦ W
(many ways of doing this; some formal, some ad hoc)
Linearise model around appropriate state (e.g. climatologicalmean)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 55/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
2. Mechanistic: Stochastic Reduction of Tangent Linear Model
Partition dynamics into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y:
dx
dt= f(x,y)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y)
Reduce coupled system to effective stochastic dynamics for x:
dx
dt= Lx +N(x,x) + S(x) ◦ W
(many ways of doing this; some formal, some ad hoc)
Linearise model around appropriate state (e.g. climatologicalmean)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 55/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
2. Mechanistic: Stochastic Reduction of Tangent Linear Model
Partition dynamics into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y:
dx
dt= f(x,y)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y)
Reduce coupled system to effective stochastic dynamics for x:
dx
dt= Lx +N(x,x) + S(x) ◦ W
(many ways of doing this; some formal, some ad hoc)
Linearise model around appropriate state (e.g. climatologicalmean)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 55/63
Stochastic ENSO Models
2. Mechanistic: Stochastic Reduction of Tangent Linear Model
Partition dynamics into “slow” and “fast” variables x and y:
dx
dt= f(x,y)
dy
dt=
1
εg(x,y)
Reduce coupled system to effective stochastic dynamics for x:
dx
dt= Lx +N(x,x) + S(x) ◦ W
(many ways of doing this; some formal, some ad hoc)
Linearise model around appropriate state (e.g. climatologicalmean)
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 55/63
Mechanistic Model: 6-Month Stochastic Optimals
From Kleeman and Moore, J. Atmos. Sci., 1997.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 56/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
whereSignal =
1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
whereSignal =
1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
whereSignal =
1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
whereSignal =
1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
where
Signal =1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
Prediction Utility
Can assess “utility” of ensemble prediction p(x) by comparingforecast pdf with “climatological” pdf q(x), using relative entropy
R =
∫p(x) ln
(p(x)
q(x)
)dx
Assuming p and q are both Gaussian, can decompose R:
R = Signal + Dispersion
whereSignal =
1
2(µp − µq)TΣ−2
q (µp − µq)−n
2
Disp =1
2ln
(det(Σ2
q)
det(Σ2p)
)+ tr(Σ2
pΣ−2q )
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 57/63
“Observed” Prediction Utility
From Tang, Kleeman, & Moore, J. Atmos. Sci., 2005.Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 58/63
Individual Forecast Contributions to Correlation
From Tang, Kleeman, & Moore, J. Atmos. Sci., 2005.
Predictive utility relates well to “skillful” forecasts
ENSO forecast skill derives mostly from initial conditions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 59/63
Individual Forecast Contributions to Correlation
From Tang, Kleeman, & Moore, J. Atmos. Sci., 2005.
Predictive utility relates well to “skillful” forecasts
ENSO forecast skill derives mostly from initial conditions
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 59/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Case Study II: Conclusions
State of Tropical Pacific has influence on “weather” and “climate”pdfs globally
Linearised stochastic dynamics can be constructed giving insight to:
maintenance of ENSO variability
sources of predictability
importance of “non-normal” dynamics
Other studies have relaxed some of the above assumptions, allowingfor e.g. multiplicative noise and nonlinearity
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 60/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
Overall Conclusions
Climate science is fundamentally probabilistic
Need for probabilistic approach arises from essential complexity ofsystem; some of these complexities can be addressed by bettermodels or observations, but some are irreducible
Fundamental challenges:
characterise climate state pdfs
understand physical origin of pdfs
use pdfs to improve forecasts/predictions
Individual processes/phenomena have been investigated withconsiderable success, but much remains to be done
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 61/63
References
1. Imkeller, P. and J.-S. von Storch (eds), 2001: Stochastic ClimateModels. Birkhäuser, 432 pp.
2. Imkeller, P. and A. Monahan, 2002: Conceptual stochastic climatemodels. Stoch. and Dynamics, 2, 311-326.
3. Palmer, T. et al., 2005: Representing model uncertainty in weatherand climate prediction. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33, 163-93.
4. Palmer, T. and P. Williams: Stochastic Physics and ClimateModelling. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., to appear in 2008.
5. Penland, C. 2003: Noise out of chaos and why it won’t go away.Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 84, 921-925.
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 62/63
Tropical Multiscale Convective Systems
Probabilistic Perspectives on Climate Dynamics – p. 63/63