PROactive: Study design

6
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89 Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1647-53 Objective: Assess the effects of pioglitazone on reducing macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Population: N = 5238 with type 2 diabetes and history of macrovascular disease Treatment: Pioglitazone (up to 45 mg) or placebo Primary outcome: Composite of all-cause mortality, MI, ACS, coronary or peripheral revascularization, amputation, stroke Secondary outcomes: Individual components of primary outcome, CV mortality Follow-up: 4 years

description

PROactive: Study design. Objective: Assess the effects of pioglitazone on reducing macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Population: N = 5238 with type 2 diabetes and history of macrovascular disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of PROactive: Study design

Page 1: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: Study design

Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1647-53.

Objective: Assess the effects of pioglitazone on reducing macrovascular events in type 2 diabetes

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Population: N = 5238 with type 2 diabetes and history of macrovascular disease

Treatment: Pioglitazone (up to 45 mg) or placebo

Primary outcome: Composite of all-cause mortality, MI, ACS, coronary or peripheral revascularization, amputation, stroke

Secondary outcomes: Individual components of primary outcome, CV mortality

Follow-up: 4 years

Page 2: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: Baseline characteristics

Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1647-53.

Patient description Mean ± SD

Age (yrs) 61.8 ± 7.7Male (%) 66.1Caucasian (%) 98.5Type 2 diabetes (yrs since onset) 9.5 ± 7.0Weight (lbs) 194 ± 34BMI (kg/m2) 30.9 ± 4.8Waist circumference (in) 41.46 ± 4.7Systolic BP (mm Hg) 143.4 ± 17.8Triglycerides (mg/dL) 198.4 ± 158.8HDL-C (mg/dL) 44.9 ± 12LDL-C (mg/dL) 114.5 ± 37A1C (%) 8.08 ± 1.41

Page 3: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: CV medications at study entry

Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1647-53.

-Blockers 2859 (55%)

ACEI 3286 (63%)

ARB 356 (7%)

CCB 1855 (35%)

Nitrates 2058 (39%)

Thiazide 830 (16%)

Antiplatelets 4394 (84%) Aspirin 3829 (73%)

Statins 2135 (41%)

Fibrates 448 (9%)

Current therapy n (%)

Page 4: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: Reduction in primary outcome

Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.

Number at risk

Pioglitazone 2488 2373 2302 2218 2146 348Placebo 2530 2413 2317 2215 2122 345

5

10

15

25

06

20

0 12 18 24 30 36

Pioglitazone(514 events)

Placebo(572 events)

Time from randomization (months)

Proportionof events

(%)

All-cause mortality, nonfatal MI (including silent MI), ACS, revascularization, leg amputation, stroke

*Unadjusted

10% RRRHR* 0.90 (0.80–1.02)

P = 0.095

Page 5: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: Reduction in secondary outcome

Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.

Number at risk

Pioglitazone 2536 2487 2435 2381 2336 396

Placebo 2566 2504 2442 2371 2315 390

5

10

15

25

06

20

0 12 18 24 30 36

Pioglitazone(301 events)

Placebo(358 events)

Time from randomization (months)

Proportionof events

(%)

16% RRRHR* 0.84 (0.72–0.98)

P = 0.027

Combined nonfatal MI, all-cause mortality, stroke

*Unadjusted

Page 6: PROactive: Study design

VBWG

PROactive: Reduced need for insulin

Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366:1279-89.

Number at risk

Pioglitazone 1700 1654 1603 1554 1499 244

Placebo 1646 1544 1472 1401 1325 202

5

10

15

25

06

20

0 12 18 24 30 36

Pioglitazone(183 events)

Placebo(362 events)

Time from randomization (months)

Proportionof events

(%)

53% RRRHR* 0.47 (0.39–0.56)

P < 0.0001

*Unadjusted