Child Labor in the U.S. and Britain during the Industrial Revolution Parallels and Contrasts
Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India...
-
Upload
centre-for-policy-research -
Category
Education
-
view
198 -
download
1
Transcript of Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India...
![Page 1: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PRIVATE WEALTH, THE STATE AND POPULAR REACTIONParallels And Contrasts Between Contemporary India And The US Gilded Age.
Michael WaltonCentre for Policy ResearchNew Delhi30th July, 2015
![Page 2: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Thanks to CPR for photos, Pratap Bhanu Mehta, Ashutosh Varshney and others for discussions, Pranav Sidhawi for support
Is India in a US style
Gilded Age, for good or ill? What response?
![Page 3: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Themes• Gilded Age US and India: private wealth concentration on
a rent-extracting and rent-sharing path• Subsidiary theme: rent-sharing is sometimes developmentally
aligned—as in the boom period• Reaction: Progressive Era in the US shaped regulated
capitalism and (a degree of) social democracy• In India the socio-political reaction has not (yet) coalesced
in an effective response• Despite “paradox” of widespread regulation
![Page 4: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Aggregate patterns: India growing much faster than Gilded Age US from 1980s
Source: Maddison project
Average decadal growth, 1990PPP$
![Page 5: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
….and with less volatility
Years from start year: 1880 for US; 1970 for India
![Page 6: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
So why do we care about this comparison?• India is poorer and long-term growth dynamics not robust• Concern that concentrated wealth could
• Distort growth dynamics• Corrupt the political system
• Social and political response may be inadequate
![Page 7: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
India is poorer…
![Page 8: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
..and most countries get stuck sooner or laterMexico a salient example…
![Page 9: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
US Gilded Age: huge private wealth mainly in “rent-thick” sectorsWealth of richest Americans active circa 1900 (in today’s prices)
Source: New York Times, July 15th 2007; updated from Klepper and Gunther
In $bln
![Page 10: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
A contemporary view of Standard Oil
Source: contemporary cartoon via Robinson 2009
![Page 11: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Parallels: US Gilded Age and India• Massive private wealth accumulation on the back of
corporate expansion• Much of this in rent-thick sectors
• Oil and gas• Railroads in US (not India as government-owned!)• Other mining• Steel
• Deeply linked to deals between business and politicians with trusted networks central (“friends” of railroads)• For railroads, land deals part of this nexus
• Often inefficient, often with great market power• Major environmental destruction• Social costs
![Page 12: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
India’s billionaires: experienced a surge in their wealth post liberalization
Source: Forbes.com
![Page 13: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Billionaires: and India has unusually high billionaire-wealth/GDP for her income
India
[India billionaire ratio 12% in2015]
![Page 14: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
With significant concentration in “rent-thick” sectors, shifting in recent years (more later on this)
Source: Forbes.com updated from Gandhi and Walton,2012
“Rent-thick”: real estate, construction,telecom, infrastructure, finance,steel, liquor and mining
![Page 15: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Business and politics• In US
• Businessmen in politics e.g. Leland Stanford(!)• Creation of the lobby system
• In India• Increasing overlaps between businessmen and politicians• Deals and political finance at core of relationship
![Page 16: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Capitalism and the state: contrast between India and the US• License Raj and (misnamed) “crony socialism”
• e.g. Dhirubhai Ambani adept at both breaking into the rent-based regulatory system and fostering a share-holding culture
• More later on institutional leapfrogging
![Page 17: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Both US Gilded Age and India display “two faces of capitalism”• Rent-thick, connected capitalism alongside dynamic,
competitive capitalism• In India: example: in Mody, Nath and Walton (2012) we
found little evidence of concentration affecting profit behavior of enterprises in post-1990 period• But surge in entry in 1990s tailed off in 2000s boom, especially in
manufacturing, with rising concentration• State enterprises and major business houses continued to be
dominant
![Page 18: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Both exemplify “aligned” rent-sharing, with expansion in industrial capability• In US: railways created modern corporate form• In India: major conglomerates breaking into international
markets
![Page 19: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Case study: Andhra Pradesh (1)• Dynamic corporate growth; aligned rent-sharing?
![Page 20: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Politicians and businessmen
![Page 21: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Rent-sharing through allocation of publicly controlled resources
• Direct construction contracts• Land & concessions for PPPs • Mining leases• Ownership of liquor licenses
![Page 22: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
PPPs• Majority of allotments for SEZs, power
generation, real estate projects, tourism promotion• Features of allotment
• No land allotment policy – so discretionary• Land transferred at highly concessional rates• Managed via Andhra Pradesh Industrial Investment Corporation (APIIC) as channels
for transferring land cheaply• 88492 Acres allotted in 2006-11 period • Private partner slowly marginalizes the government share and virtually takes over
the project (CAG)
• In PPP contracts, aggressive bidding + renegotiation a standard pattern
![Page 23: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
GVK and GMR now
![Page 24: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
…with spectacular growth in corporate debt
And large declines in wealth of their owners; off the billionaire list
![Page 25: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Mechanism: the intermingling of politicians and businessmen
• Large business leaders prefer Parliament over State Assembly• 14 richest MPs (of the 61 from both houses) own large business groups• In all the 14 cases, fortunes made in infrastructure and public works contracts
• MLAs and local politicians in lower-level business interests• Sub-contracting large infrastructure contracts• Liquor shop licenses• Colleges and hospitals (see next)
![Page 26: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Problems for long-run growth(a) Rent-sharing dynamic undercuts the infrastructural,
land and financial basis for dynamic growth (b) Rent-extracting opportunities divert entrepeneurial
effort from a productivity-innovation dynamic
(c) Plus centrality of efficient social inclusion to manage politics
![Page 27: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Further political economic transformation…• Is needed….to avoid the “middle income trap”• Some (e.g. Fukuyama) argue that this is problematic in
“clientelistic” democracy without effective state-building and the rule of law• Though “getting to Italy” (or even Mexico) isn’t all bad
• The US trajectory is an exception• So comparison with Progressive Era even more
interesting than Gilded Age
![Page 28: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Inequality
Conflict
Social patronage+
Unbridled,or crony,capitalism
Social democracy+
EfficientlyRegulatedcapitalism
Alternative pathways
![Page 29: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Insights• The “rent-sharing and populist path” can be a functional
political equilibrium for a sustained period• Rent-sharing, patronage and populism can deliver phases
of significant developmental benefits (see above on industrial capability)
• But absent further political economic transformation gets stuck in low productivity dynamics and distributive conflict
• Back to US….
![Page 30: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Lower and middle class became wary of big business and turned to government as a counterweight
![Page 31: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Underpinned by deepening of democracy (Australian ballot; reduction in clientelism)
Source: contemporary cartoon via Robinson 2009
![Page 32: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Structure of reaction• In US a version of a Polanyi “double movement”• A multi-decade, changing, ultimately effective alliance between:
• Popular movements—Grangers, Populist, Progressives, anti-monopoly, reform movement in cities
• Legislative• Executive• Judiciary• Muckraking journalism
• Leading to elements of a modern social democratic state• Bureaucracy (from Pendleton Act to “bureaucratic autonomy”)• Business regulation (anti-trust etc)• Rights and protections (unions, food)• Social protection (especially after Great Depression)• From machine politics to urban reform
![Page 33: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
A “Grand Bargain” developed between 1890s and 1930s (and beyond)Capitalism preserved: Government supported business, but took action to manage its excesses ( “market failures”)
•Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)•Pure Food and Drug Act (1906)•Glass-Steagall Act (1933) (insured bank deposits and separated investment from commercial banking)
•Clayton Act (1914) National Labor Relations Act (1935)•Minimum wage
![Page 34: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
New Deal policies greatly expanded social safety net• In both US and Nordics, social provisioning a product of
conflict• In 1930s US had moved further than Nordics
• Unemployment insurance (1935)• Social Security (1935)
• Established capitalists an important part of support for social democratic transition in both cases (Swenson, 2004)
![Page 35: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Along with education-technological change dynamics (plus war) led to the Great Compression of incomes
Source: Piketty and Saez, 2003.
US: peak of
Gilded Agewealth
US: new social
contract
Top income shares in US, 1913-1998
![Page 36: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
…with subsequent rise echoed in India?
India top 0.1%of taxpayers (!)
![Page 37: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
India: 2G and coal. A full arc from Gilded Age rent extraction to efficient regulated capitalism?
Two scams: thick with rent-extraction & sharing CAG
reports
Popular mobilizations
Executive, legislative and judicial action
Auctions, transparency and efficiency ?
![Page 38: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Thesis: the broader system remains stuck• Despite the apparent “full arc” of 2G and coal, overall
change of the political economy remains (structurally) incomplete.
• A mix of capture, hold-up and populist political strategy• There isn’t an effective coalition that supports efficient
resolution of the underlying distributive conflicts
![Page 39: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Compare: institutional leapfrogging in India, at least in form• Theme: India already has many of the institutional
“victories” of the Progressive movement!• Bureaucracy
• A formally meritocratic, “Weberian” system• Business regulation
• SEBI etc.• Competition commission• Corporate governance reforms
• Social provisioning• Much greater spending on poverty programs, • Rights to work, food, unionization, etc..
• +electorate more than willing to “throw the rascals out”
![Page 40: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
…raising a paradox• Despite the more extensive state and associated rights
India still has many of the characteristics of the Gilded Age business-state links and weak protections
• Why?
• Short answer (Fukuyama?—clientelist democracy): uninteresting and troubling
• Long answer: complex and interesting
![Page 41: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Why (1): Extensive state has become domain of capture and effective rent-sharing• Political finance• Land deals• Businessmen in politics; politicians in business• Criminals in politics etc
![Page 42: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Why (2): the “failure” of the bureaucracy• Subservient or complicit with politician deals (power of
politicians to move; part of rent-sharing)• Few parts of bureaucracy have experienced the
subsequent US transition to bureaucratic autonomy (Forestry, Post Office; Carpenter, 2001))
• Lack of capacity (Vaishnav)
![Page 43: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Why (3): Indian popular reaction distinct from Progressive Movement• Protective of interests rather than building a social
democratic vision with regulated capitalism• Farmer movements—multiple subsidies• Resistance to eviction and exploitation—slums and forests• Movement coalescing around “anti-corruption” and an unusual,
contingent coalition (Sitapati, 2011)• Media largely captured by business (and government)• Some apparent “victories”: thus coal and 2G, but not a
coordinated alliance to reconstruct the state; unclear if transformative even in these domains
• Polanyi double movement at same time hard to manage
![Page 44: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Why (4): electoral strategies
• Some distributive sharing politically essential
• Populist or clientelistic electoral strategies dominant
• Delhi election an example• demand for better governance• focal point depends on alternative• AAP an unresolved mix of pro-accountability and populism
![Page 45: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Case study: Andhra Pradesh (2)• Politically efficient populist strategies
![Page 46: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Politicians and citizens/voters
![Page 47: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Welfare programs that combine populism with rent-creation• Post-matriculation scholarships - for professional courses
• Rs 5500 crore budgeted for 2013-14• Doubling of engineering colleges and seats in 2008-11
• Eligible for BPL holders (~75% of population)• Public money finances private organisations, often owned or
controlled by politicians
![Page 48: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Welfare programs that support rent extraction and sharing—Cashless tertiary health care-Aarogyasri• Similar structure: BPL, includes private hospitals• ~ 80 mln people; 938 medical conditions• Nearly Rs 2000 crores pa• Trebling of specialty care capacity in private sector in 2007-12• No impact on out ofpocket spending
![Page 49: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Prospect: through this prism, was the 2014 “Modi” election transformative?
As in the
power of the ballot
in US?
![Page 50: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Major rise in billionaire numbers in 2015Just over 50 in 2013 and 2014Almost 90 in 2015
~30 in traditionally “rent-thick” sectors~60 in “other”
14 in pharma, 12 “consumer goods”, 6 IT/sofware
9 real estate
![Page 51: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Prospect: through this prism, was the 2014 “Modi” election transformative?• Of course verdict is out, but can argue…• Alongside “Progressive” changes…
• The coal and 2G story—product of UPA period• Continued rhetoric on social provisioning (sanitation; promise of social
insurance; JAM [ID+mobile banking; hopeful]; if ambivalent [MGNREGA])• Some financial reform preparation
• …political risk-aversion, reflective of updated version of Bardhan’s collective action problem, or KN Raj’s view of dependence on intermediate classes.• Subsidies• State banks and finance• Land and infrastructure major unresolved issues
• Cooperative federalism (from Finance Commission) fine and better than Centrally Sponsored Schemes (failure of top-down, rule-based conditionality), but• States already the central nexus for patronage and rent-sharing• Unlike the US, cities not domains for effective movements and contestation, as
subservient to the states—haven’t even gone through a machine politics phase
![Page 52: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Short run developments problematic
From Ashoka Mody presentation April 2015
![Page 53: Private Wealth, the State and Popular Reaction: Parallels and Contrasts Between Contemporary India and the US Gilded Age](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062523/589d7d771a28ab69538b632f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Final view• Gilded Age dynamics at work in the more extensive
domain of state-business in 21st Century India• Electorate is seeking an alternative equilibrium• Unlike US Progressive Era, neither collective action nor
cognitive maps of social movements and political class aligned with required change.
• So what prospect?• Short run ambiguous: growth surge may occur with temporary
alignment of rent-sharing and investment• Medium term problematic, Gilded Age plus populist resolution; with
substantial developmental risks. Heterogeneous across states• Long term: eventual coalescence around Progressive style political
coalition?