Private and Public law lesson 5 The impact of EU law on the domestic legal system; implementation of...
-
Upload
phoebe-walton -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Private and Public law lesson 5 The impact of EU law on the domestic legal system; implementation of...
Private and Public law
lesson 5 The impact of EU law on the domestic legal system; implementation of EU law into national legislations; Italy (and EU) external relations and
relevant legal basis
INDEX
1. interaction between EU law and Italian law: the evolution of the Court approach
2. The new art. 117 of the Italian Constitution
3. The impact of non self-executing norms (EU law) on Italian law
4. The principle of supremacy of EU law
5. Technical implementation of EU law into Italian law
What is the ranking of EU law (within the Italian system of sources)? Equal to ordinary laws, constitutional laws, or other?
- “lex posterior derogat priori”- what happens in case of conflict with a domestic rule?
1. Interaction between EU law and Italian law_________________________________
Need to identify a constitutional basis, justifying the application of EU law in Italy
1. Interaction between EU law and Italian law_________________________________
Need to identify a constitutional basis, justifying application of EU law in Italy
Art. 10, par. 1, of the Italian Constitution: “Italy conforms to commonly recognized international law”
Art. 11 of the Italian Constitution: “Italy consents, on a reciprocity basis with other States, to limitations to sovereignty for the purpose of ensuring peace and justice among Nations; it promotes international organizations devoted to that purpose”
1. The evolution of the Constitutional Court approach_________________________________
FIRST STAGE EU law has the same ranking as Italian ordinary
laws
SECOND STAGEItalian law conflicting with EU law is constitutionally illegitimate (art. 11)
THIRD STAGEEU law is an autonomous and independent system,
as opposed to Italian law (art. 11 + law implementing the EU Treaty): disregarding domestic
law
1. FIRST STAGE_________________________________
The “Costa vs. ENEL” decision:
- EU law has the same ranking as Italian ordinary laws
- in case of conflict, a norm prevails over those which were previously enacted
1. FIRST STAGE_________________________________
The “reaction” of the European Court of Justice
- The EU legal order is not “separate” from domestic legislations
- the principle of supremacy of EU law is irrespective of the relevant implementation mechanisms
- domestic rules conflicting with EU law should be held as totally ineffective
- EU law is assimilated to “ordre public” rules (mandatory provisions of law), overriding domestic legislation
1. SECOND STAGE_________________________________
- The “Frontini” decision: Italian law conflicting with EU law is constitutionally illegitimate (art. 11 of the Italian Constitution: “Italy consents, on a reciprocity basis with other States, to limitations to
sovereignty for the purpose of ensuring peace and justice among Nations; it promotes international organizations devoted to that
purpose”). An intervention of the Constitutional Court is required
the doctrine of “counter-limitations”: EU law may not impact on fundamental rights of individuals, according to each
domestic Constitution
1. SECOND STAGE_________________________________
- The “Industrie Chimiche” decision: the Italian judge may not disregard the domestic rule of law.
If ever, in case of conflict with EU law, he/she may submit the issue to the Constitutional Court
1. SECOND STAGE_________________________________
The “reaction” of the European Court of Justice
- The “Simmenthal” decision (the Italian judge must disregard domestic rules conflicting with EU law, both prior or subsequent to the EU norm,
without the need for any intervention of the Constitutional Court)- The “Factortame” decision
1. THIRD STAGE_________________________________
The “Granital” decision:
- EU law and Italian law are autonomous and separate legal orders. EU law regulates areas from which Italian law “voluntarily withdraws”
- therefore, the Italian judge should apply EU law and ignore/disregard the domestic rule conflicting with the EU provisions – this is by virtue of Art. 11 of the Constitution + the law implementing the EU Treaty in Italy
- counter-limitations
1. THIRD STAGE_________________________________
Other decisions of the Italian Constitutional Court:
- The Italian Government challenged a decision issued by Umbria (Regional law) conflicting with EU law (1994)
- The impact of EU law on the domestic (constitutional) system regulating competences and powers of the Regions and the central State (1996)
1. THIRD STAGE_________________________________
Other decisions of the European Court of Justice:
- The Italian judge might disregard Art. 2909 Civil Code (the Court decisions bind all parties, their successor and assigns, as well as any third party involved in the dispute), if that hampers full application of EU law
- the national judge should interpret domestic law (including non self-executing norms) in order to make it consistent with EU law
2. The new art. 117 of the Constitution_________________________________
Art. 117: “legislative power is exercised by the State and the Regions within the limits (and in compliance with the obligations) set out by
EU law and by the international legal order”: a parameter for the Italian legislative bodies
+
Art. 11 of the Italian Constitution: “Italy consents, on a reciprocity basis with other States, to limitations to sovereignty for the purpose of
ensuring peace and justice among Nations; it promotes international organizations devoted to that purpose”:
the legal basis for the obligation for Italy to conform to EU law
3. Non self-executing norms of EU law_________________________________
Self-executing norms
the judge must apply the EU norm and disregard the Italian conflicting norm (“third stage”)
___________________________________________________________
Non self-executing norms
the judge must submit the issue to the Constitutional Court
4. The Treaty of Lisbon and the principle of supremacy of EU law
_________________________________
The “supremacy clause”:
- the Treaty of Lisbon does not include it- It is stated in the Declaration No. 17 attached to the Treaty of Lisbon- It is mentioned in several decisions of the European Court of Justice decisions- It is mentioned in several decisions of National Constitutional Courts decisions
4. The Treaty of Lisbon and the principle of supremacy of EU law
_________________________________
The Principle of Supremacy is subject to the following:
- the principle of conferral being complied with
- who is competent to evaluate whether the EU competences were correctly exercised?