Priority Sector Lending NS
-
Upload
shrin548366 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.173 -
download
1
Transcript of Priority Sector Lending NS
Priority Sector Lending
Microfinance India conference
9 October 2007 N.Srinivasan
Don’t be hasty; You can take a loan that Is just like loot. Nobody repays Hands
upABC Bank
Branch manager
The logic of PSL
• Constraints in credit flow to sectors which support a large number of livelihoods
• Preference for industry, commerce, trade and security based financing
• Banks must support vulnerable and unglamorous sectors also
• Banking as a public utility?
• Credit as a universal service obligation?
History so far
• Introduced in 1969• Quantitative targets brought in 1974• Stipulation of 40% target in 1985• Narasimham committee I on financial
sector reforms did not favour continuation• Narasimham committee II on financial
sector reforms favoured continuation• Recent review by RBI internal Working
Group in 2005 supported continuation
Changes in the environment
• Agriculture less significant in contribution to national income
• Rapidly expanding service sector
• Financial sector reforms – emphasis on profitability of banks
• Greater private ownership of banks
• Large expectations from banks – by people and govts
Norms - targetCategory Domestic Banks Foreign Banks
Total P S advances
40 percent of ANBC*
32 percent of ANBC
Agri credit 18% of ANBC No target
SSI No specific target 10 percent of ANBC
Export credit Not part of PS 12 percent of ANBC
Advances to weaker sections
10 percent of ANBC No target
The norms – sectors and type of loans• 1. Agriculture • 2. Small scale industries • 3. Small road and water transport operators • 4. Small business • 5. Retail trade • 6. Professional and self-employed persons• 7. State sponsored organisations for SC/ST• 8. Education loans• 9. Housing. • 10. Consumption loans for weaker sections• 11. Loans to SHGs and NGOs for onlending to SHGs• 12. Loans to the software industry• 13. Loans to food and agro-processing sector • 14. Investment by banks in venture capital
1969 1991 2001 2005 2006 2007
Agri 162 16750 51922 125250 172292 230180
SSI 257 17181 56002 74588 90239
Others 22 8984 46490 181638 247379
Total 441 42915 154414 381476 509910 632647
Priority sector loans by commercial banks – outstanding (Rs crore)
Present status Share (%) of different sectors in credit
1969 1991 2001 2005 2006
Agriculture 36.73 39.03 33.63 32.83 33.79
SSI 58.28 40.03 36.27 19.55 17.70
Others 4.99 20.93 30.11 47.61 48.51
Total 100 100 100 100 100
Changes in norms and their impact
• Inclusion of more sectors – banks enlarge OPS portfolio 4% in 1969 – 48% in 2006
• Raising of ceiling limits of loans and units – preference for larger loans (small loan accounts decline by 26 lakh between 1992 and 2004)
• Interest rate ceilings on small loans –focus shifts to on large loans (average loan size Rs 1.17 lakhs)
Quality of compliance
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% share to total
1969 1991 2001 2005 2006
Years
Changes in composition of PSL
Agriculture SSI Others
Quality of compliance
• Targets achieved at bank level• Some states and regions underfinanced• Agriculture sub-targets ensure sustained
share in flow – SSI sector suffers• Indirect finance and investment in bonds
of SIDBI and RIDF of NABARD preferred• Small loans - not a priority• Monitoring requires improvement to
ensure quality of compliance
Problems of banks
• Stringent prudential standards
• Interest rate and pricing
• Collateral requirements
• Borrower selection – govt sponsored programmes
• Network and staffing constraints
Priority sector and inclusion• PS can facilitate achievement of inclusion
agenda
• Focus to shift from underserved sectors to underserved people
• States/regions with lower intensity of coverage to be prioritised
• Microfinance would be a critical tool in inclusion
Microfinance –an alternative to PSL?
• 29 lakh SHGs covered
• Credit flow of Rs 6640 crore last fiscal
• Network constraints of banks make microfinance an ideal option for PSL
• Facilitator model could provides the means
• But microfinance is not a substitute to PSL
• Loan volumes about 1% of PSL portfolio
Rural Infrastructure Development Fund
• Mechanism of investing shortfalls in PSL• Remunerative in the beginning• Penal element – low interest rates- introduced
subsequently• Allocations for deposits not met – gap of Rs 25000
crore• By 2007, allocations for 2003-04 were met• No remedial action taken• New Deposits not reckoned as PSL from April 2007
Deposits and Disbursements under RIDF (Rs. crore)
Year Deposits Disbursements Allocation1995-96 350.00 387.34 20001996-97 1,042.30 1,087.08 25001997-98 1,007.04 1,009.03 25001998-99 1,337.95 1,313.12 30001999-00 2,306.63 2,277.87 35002000-01 2,653.64 3,176.85 45002001-02 3,590.72 3,790.37 50002002-03 3,857.09 4,103.42 55002003-04 2,158.69 3,922.09 55002004-05 4,353.47 4,316.85 80002005-06 6,092.37 5,953.32 80002006-07 6,966.43 6,222.58 10000Total 35,716.33 37,559.92 60000
Recent changes
• Adjusted net bank credit (net bank credit + govt security investment held to maturity) as of previous year end as the basis
• Investment in securitised assets with underlying PSL loans reckoned
• PSL portfolio purchase reckoned• Participation certificates (risk sharing) with
underlying PSL reckoned• Loans to NGOs/MFIs for on-lending reckoned• Fresh deposits with NABARD/SIDBI not reckoned
The road ahead
• Reasons exist for continuation• Recent changes likely to improve credit-flow and
quality of compliance• Restrictions on banks’ autonomy should be
withdrawn• Facilitators to play a key role• Banks with network and staff would be able to
sell portfolios, securitised assets and IBPCs• Cooperative banks and RRBs could benefit
through portfolio sales• MFIs likely to benefit with more bank credit• Microfinance will get a boost
Conclusion
• Time for review of targets of each sector
• People and regional focus needed
• Inclusion objective to be integrated with PSL
• Tighter monitoring and effective enforcement
• Need for a sunset clause – with achievement of full financial inclusion?
Thank you
for the patience