Prior Restraint and the case of Near v. Minnesota September 7-9, 2004 ComS 152 Freedom of Speech.
-
Upload
dortha-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Prior Restraint and the case of Near v. Minnesota September 7-9, 2004 ComS 152 Freedom of Speech.
Prior Restraint and the case of Near v. Minnesota
September 7-9, 2004ComS 152
Freedom of Speech
The History of the Concept of Prior Restraint The Greek tradition The English tradition Sir William Blackstone An interesting question: Is it really
free speech if we only guarantee that you are free to publish or speak, but then are unwilling to put limits on how you can be punished for that speech subsequently?
Near v. Minnesota: the facts of the case
What is the political climate like in Minneapolis at the time of the case?
What exactly is being prohibited? What did the law say?
How did lower courts rule in the case? Did the US Supreme Court accept the
case for certiorari?
Near v. Minnesota: the Supreme Court case Decision in the case What did the majority argue? What points did those justices in
dissent make? Why is this case significant?
The presumption against prior restraints is large.
The establishment of the war time exception
The Progeny of Near
What the heck is a “progeny” anyhow?
New York Times v. US—the Pentagon Papers case
The Progressive case—not a SCt. case, but still important
The CIA cases—US v. Marchetti, Haig v. Agee
A Glossary of Terms
Seditious libel Previous restraint/prior restraint Presumption Magic bullet theory of
communication Gatekeeper theory of
communication