Bruno Barbosa Hector Cintron Glenn Drzewicki Advisor: Professor Yiding Cao.
Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George...
![Page 1: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination
Law in the U.S.
Professor Glenn GeorgeUniversity of North Carolina School of LawVisiting Professor, Sichuan University Law
School
![Page 2: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
North Carolina
![Page 3: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overview
• Introduction to U.S. anti-discrimination principles – U.S. Constitution and employment discrimination statutes
• Theories of employment discrimination• Types of remedies available• Questions
![Page 4: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction to American Anti-Discrimination Law: The
Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
“No State shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
![Page 5: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Challenge to system segregated education -- “separate but equal” schools for white and African-American children
![Page 6: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Brown v. Board of Education
Segregation as discrimination• Supreme Court found that policy of
separation suggests inferiority• Physical segregation as discrimination• “Mental” segregation as discrimination
-- stereotyping
![Page 7: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Stereotyping as Discrimination
• Women are bad drivers.• African Americans are not smart.• Men are strong; women are weak.• African Americans are good
athletes.
![Page 8: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Public to Private
• Fourteenth Amendment applies only to government action
• Legislation by Congress to expand discrimination protection to the private sector and expand protected categories
![Page 9: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Anti-Discrimination Legislation
Civil Right Act of 1964–Title II – Public Accommodations–Title VI – Race discrimination by
those receiving federal funds–Title VII – Employment
discrimination
![Page 10: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Anti-Discrimination Legislation
• Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (1967) (as amended)
• Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990)-- Expanding coverage of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1978-- Amended by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008
![Page 11: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Protected Categories
• Race• Color• Religion• Sex• National origin• Age (ADEA)• Disabilities (Rehabilitation Act and ADA)
![Page 12: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Theories of Discrimination
• Individual Discrimination (“disparate treatment”)• Group discrimination (“systemic
disparate treatment”) • Disparate impact
![Page 13: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Individual Discrimination
• Most common• An individual claims he or she was
denied a job or employment benefit because of his or her protected category (race, sex, etc.)
• Issue for the court: What was the “real” reason or motivation for the employer’s decision?
![Page 14: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
How to Prove Unlawful Intent?
• “Direct” evidence – employer admits or states basis of decision. (“Women cannot drive trucks.”
• Circumstantial evidence – discrimination is inferred or assumed from other facts.
• “Pretext” – proving that the employer’s explanation is not the “real” reason for his actions
![Page 15: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Proving “Pretext”
• Example: The employer hires a man and claims the man is better qualified, but the facts show that the female applicant is better qualified.
• Example: I am African American and the employer fires me for missing 3 days of work. The facts show that several white employees also missed 3 days but were not fired.
![Page 16: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)
• Ann Hopkins was denied partnership in her accounting firm
• Direct evidence: Hopkins told to dress and act more femininely – wear jewelry, have her hair styled, wear make-up, etc.
• Circumstantial evidence: Hopkins was more successfully in handling large accounts than men who were made partner
![Page 17: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Remedies
• Theory of “make whole” – putting the plaintiff where she should have been had the discrimination never happened.
• Example: I damage your car in a traffic accident. I pay to have the car repaired so that the car is in the same condition as before the accident.
• Attorneys fees
![Page 18: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Individual Remedies (cont.)
• Compensatory damages-- other damages from loss of job
• Punitive Damages-- only available in especially serious cases
• Total “cap” of $300,000• Attorneys fees
![Page 19: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Remedies: Individual Discrimination
Example: Ann Hopkins was not made a partner in her accounting firm because of her sex.
“Equitable” relief:• Order that Ms. Hopkins be made a partner• Calculate and award salary/income Ms.
Hopkins would have made as a partner (deduct income earned during same period).
• Add other lost benefits
![Page 20: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Group (Systemic) Discrimination
• A “group” claim – the plaintiffs are trying to prove that the employer treats all or most members of the group (blacks, women, etc.) worse that others
• Intent is still the key issue to be proved – what is the employer’s real motivation?
![Page 21: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Proving Group Discrimination
• Use of statistics – for example, the workforce is 50% female but my employees are only 10% female
• Use of specific examples involving individuals – for example, stories of specific individuals who were not hired even though well qualified
![Page 22: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hazelwood School Dist. v. U.S. (1977)
• Issue: Hiring African-American teachers in school district near St. Louis, Missouri
• “Qualified” pool = certified teachers in the St. Louis area
• Qualified pool = 15% African American• Hazelwood = 2% African American
teachers
![Page 23: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Remedies: Group Discrimination
• Injunction – stop discrimination in the future
• Attorneys fees• “Affirmative action” – unusual remedy
only in most serious cases• Individual relief – presumption of
discrimination must be disproven by employer
![Page 24: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Disparate Impact
• Use of a neutral factor that excludes a larger percentage of the protected class (compared to the majority)
• Example: All employees must be 175 cm tall.• Requirement will exclude some men but
many more women.• Intent is not important – but employer can
defend by proving business necessity
![Page 25: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Duke Power v. Griggs (1971)
• Implementation of high school diploma requirement
• Only 30% of whites finished high school in North Carolina
• But only 6% of African Americans finished high school, therefore disproportionately excluded
• Defense: Was a high school diploma needed for the jobs?
![Page 26: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Remedies: Disparate Impact
• Injunction to prohibit continued use of job requirement challenged
• No individual relief other than the opportunity to compete for the job without the challenged job requirement
• Attorneys fees• No damages available
![Page 27: Principles and Development of Employment Discrimination Law in the U.S. Professor Glenn George University of North Carolina School of Law Visiting Professor,](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032521/56649d5e5503460f94a3d544/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Questions?