Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
-
Upload
caitlin-barker -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
![Page 1: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Principals’ Conference Network 609
October 4, 2012Mathematics
![Page 2: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Citywide Instructional Expectations for 2012-2013
A. In grades PK-5, students will experience four Common Core-aligned units of study: two in math and two aligned to the literacy standards in ELA, social studies, and/or science.
B. In grades 6-12, students will experience eight Common Core-aligned units of study: two in math, two in ELA, two in
social studies, and two in science
C. In grades PK-8, schools will use guidance from the DOE to review their scope and sequence and:
Reorganize math content to teach fewer topics and allow for more time to focus on the major work of
the grade.
![Page 3: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Implementation Guidance for the 2012-2013 Citywide Instructional
expectations
The city has composed a timeline for schools to serve as a model for implementing and
gauging progress regarding the implementation of the CIE.
Schools can use this document with consideration of their unique needs.
The bullets relating specifically to the math are highlighted in red.
http://schools.nyc.gov/Academics/CommonCoreLibrary/About/InstructionalExpectations/default.htm
![Page 4: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2012-2013 Citywide Instructional Implementation Guidelines
May-August 2012: Evaluate successes and challenges of 2011-12 work and plan for
implementation in 2012-13: Analyze resulting student work from 2011-12 Common Core-aligned
units; Review points of access for all students and opportunities for student
representation and engagement. Universal Design for Learning (http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html) may be a
helpful framework; Identify areas where teacher practice improved and areas that will need greater
focus moving forward. Plan for professional development that strengthens teacher practice to meet the
demands of the Common Core. In K-5, plan for Response to Intervention (RTI)1 implementation.
In PK-8, revise school’s current math scope and sequences to teach fewer topics and allow for more time to focus on the major work of the grade.
In PK-8, identify texts that reflect a combination of literary and informational texts.
In grades 9-12, focus on student work from this year and what it shows about gaps to be addressed for next year. Pay attention to the discipline-specific gaps in ELA, science and social studies.
Plan an assessment strategy that includes ongoing assessments aligned to key standards and curriculum.
![Page 5: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
September 2012 – January 2013:
Continue to deepen shared understanding of Danielson’s Framework for Teaching;
Launch regular cycles of formative observation and feedback aligned to Danielson’s Framework and in support of Common Core alignment;
Identify and support pivotal teaching strategies that will help move students toward mastery.
Launch collaborative inquiry focused on analyzing student work:
Administer baseline assessments to understand what students do and do not know;
Implement the first round of Common Core-aligned units for the school year;
Analyze resulting student work to inform next round of unit planning;
Based on analysis of student work, identify aspects of teacher practice that could help address student gaps. Adjust professional development plans to address identified teacher needs.
![Page 6: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
February – June 2013: Continue to deepen shared understanding of Danielson’s
Framework for Teaching. Continue regular cycles of formative observation and
feedback aligned to Danielson’s Framework and in support of Common Core implementation;
Support pivotal teaching strategies that will help move students toward mastery.
Continue collaborative inquiry focused on analyzing student work:
Implement the second round of Common Core-aligned units. Analyze resulting student work to inform future work; Based on analysis of student work, identify aspects of teacher
practice that could help address student gaps in knowledge. Continue to adjust professional development plans to address
identified teacher needs. From NYC Implementation Guidance
![Page 7: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Network plan for support aligned to the implementation guidance
Planning Day 1: Elementary: October 10, 2012 @ PS 179 Middle School: October 11, 2012 @ IS 141
Content:CIE: What are they?
Danielson/Quality Review ConnectionsPacing: What does this mean for our school and
curriculum? How can we organize our resources to align to the major work of the grade.
Two Common Core Aligned Units: Where will these fall according to our pacing and what resources will
we use?Impact and effect of this work.
![Page 8: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
November 6, 2012
Planning Day 2:Content:
½ day Planning SessionExamining new resources
Collaborating and analyzing
![Page 9: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
December – March 2013
Institute for Learning, University of PittsburghProfessional Development Support.
Series of 2/3 focused and iterative workshops Dates: TBA
Topics to be covered: Examining our vision of CCSS-aligned instruction Deepening our understanding of the content standards
related to fractions and ratios and proportional relationships within the context of a lesson.
Learning about assessing and advancing questions Learning and applying accountable Talk Moves to the
share, discuss and analyze phase of a lesson Understanding performance-based assessment &
practice creating instruction tasks (Strategies for modifying textbook tasks to increase the cognitive demand of the tasks.)
Facilitator moves
![Page 10: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Quality Review Connection
A vast majority of indicators on the Quality Review Rubric relate to the work being done by teacher teams. There is a direct correlation between this work with common core aligned units of study and frequent, informal
classroom visits with feedback on instructional practices.
![Page 11: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Quality Review 1.1, 1.2, 2.2
![Page 12: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Quality Review Rubric 4.2,5.1
![Page 13: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Some things to know when planning and using
available supporting documents…
![Page 14: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EDM Guidance Documents Cross check document with standards and recommendations
![Page 15: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DOE Scope and Sequence SupportPacing, Assessments, Major work of the grade
![Page 16: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Periodic Assessment Schedulehttps://portal.nycenet.edu/Accountability/Assessment/PeriodicAssessments/Calendar/
&AuthResend1908BC2350124b5095AB75012FA405BA
![Page 17: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Units of study can be: Instructional BundlesAugment existing curriculum units of
study Contexts for learning K-5:
supplement or exchange. These small units include big ideas, multiple strategies, ample space for developing student discourse. Crosswalk document exists suggesting which lessons can be replaced by a unit (purchased through Heineman)
![Page 18: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Units include: Content and skills students need to know and be able to perform that
align to three to six primary standards to be assessed by a culminating task;
A pre-assessment that helps to surface students’ understanding of the concepts and where understanding ends/breaks down. The pre-assessment should delineate the linguistic and content needs of ELLs;
A series of learning experiences that build students toward accomplishing the goals of the unit and that reveal a conceptual progression and connection to relevant previously learned and future concepts;
A culminating task that assesses the unit’s primary standards; A mix of explicit teaching and student investigation; Explicit teaching of academic vocabulary; Access for all students through multiple means of representation, action
and expression, and engagement (refer to http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html);
Instructional supports, as needed, for ELLs (refer to these ELA and Math resources).
![Page 19: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Compliance or Change?Think-Reflect-Share
What is the potential impact of this work with the citywide expectations on teachers, students and the school as a
whole?
How can that potential be nurtured?
What would you like to see as a result of this work for your teachers, students,
school?
![Page 20: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Beginning of the year Checklist
All staff understand the Citywide instructional Expectations.
Pacing decisions have been made informed by the major work of the grade and the DOE supporting guidance documents.
Baseline assessments have been administered. Reflection on last year’s work on the CIE has
informed decisions and plans for 2012-2013. Key players have been identified for engaging in
this work. Plan for development and implementation of the
CIE has been identified.
![Page 21: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
There are only three ways to improve student learning at scale:
You can raise the level of the content that students are taught. You can increase the skill
and knowledge that teachers bring to the teaching of that content. And you can increase
the level of students’ active learning of the content.
…Schools improve through the complex and demanding work of teaching and learning.
-Richard ElmoreImproving the Instructional Core
![Page 22: Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051316/56649f135503460f94c26bb6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Thank you for your attention.