Pricing it Out: Value Based Billing October 24, 2014.
-
Upload
gilbert-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Pricing it Out: Value Based Billing October 24, 2014.
Value Billing Support Team
Jeff Sanok: ChairFinance Committee
Matt Laws: Sr. DirectorPractice Management
Jerry Murphy: Vice-Chair(Contingent Fee)
Kathy Kirmayer: Vice-Chair (Pricing)
Cliff Elgarten: (Contingent Fee)
4
What In-House Counsel Requires
“Value” (based on in-house counsel’s
definition of “success”)
“Predictability”
“Creativity/multiple AFA/VBB options”“Transparen
cy”“Efficienc
y ”“Shared
interests/ shared risk”
5
Client Steps Toward Value
• RFPs requiring AFAs
• Convergence Counsel Programs
• Use of Procurement Professionals by In-House Counsel
• Budgeting
• e-billing systems (with controls if over budget)
6
Pricing and Practice Management: Expanded Role
7
• Pricing• Budgets• Project Management• Knowledge Management• Client Status Reports
Mutual Benefits of VBB Pricing• Benefits to Clients
• Cost savings• Price certainty of legal spend• Ease of invoice review & payments• Risk sharing: aligned interests with the firm• Bottom Line = Value
• Benefits to Firms• Typically firms receive an increased volume of work from current
clients• New clients• Communication often increases with the client providing a
strengthened relationship 9
What is not value-based billing?
• Rate discounts• Blended rates• Not to exceed fee caps• Mere budgets• Even “flat fees” as some craft them…
10
Why is the Billable Hour Dying so slowly?
“VBB may be fine for commodity work, but my matter is too…
…unpredictable…complicated…important and risky
…unique.”
12
1. Fixed Fees• For time period (e.g., month)• For scope (phase)• For life of matter• For portfolio of like matters
18
Fixed Fee ExampleAnnual Fee for Defined Portfolio:• Fixed fee of $10M for all matters in competency for a
Fortune 500 company
• Docket varies with new matters added and other matters resolved• Flat fee amount changes annually to account for the
anticipated workload for the coming year• Client pays the fee at $833k per month
19
2. Monthly Retainers
• Fixed amount for a set period of time and stated scope of work– E.g., monthly amount for “counseling” work (defined
as maximum hours/task, or hours/period)• Typically applies to high-level, specialized
counseling• Provides “access” to SME’s as needed• Often contains a periodic “look back” to assess
mutual fairness
20
Monthly Retainer Example
• Counseling on Privacy/Cybersecurity Issues:
• For monthly fee of $5,000, [law firm] will counsel on day-to-day questions arising in privacy/cybersecurity regulatory arena [add specific inclusions/exclusions]. “Counseling” is defined as individual inquiries requiring less than 3 hours to complete, and total monthly inquiries requiring 10 hours or less to complete.
21
• Client or firm holds funds in reserve to grade law firm’s performance• Explicitly linked to client satisfaction with firm’s overall performance:
Holdback criteria:
• Accuracy of budget
• Achievement of case objectives on time/under budget
• Communications performance
• Right staffing performance – right level; right team; compliance with client goals (e.g., diversity; development of vertical client team)
3. Performance Holdbacks
22
Holdback Example
• Fee deal with client provided for payment of 90% of agreed fees for 12 month period for class action case, with 10% holdback payable based solely in client’s discretion
• Client paid full holdback when firm won second motion to dismiss antitrust claim with prejudice
23
4. Flat fees with success awards
• Identify victories, large and small, possible throughout life of matter
• Reward counsel for achieving victories• Flat fee alone vs. flat fee with victories
24
Flat Fee plus Success ExampleAntitrust defense:
1. Flat fee of $X for initial MTD• Set at 50% of average price
2. Plus success fee resulting in premium of 130% of average price
3. Flat fee of $Y for MSJ4. Plus success fee resulting in premium of 130% of
average price
25
• Explicitly links Firm compensation to outcome
• May include total cap on recovery varying at stage of “success”
• Ultimate value-based fee
5. Contingent Fees
26