Prevalence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing …...Cross-connection control is the effort...
Transcript of Prevalence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing …...Cross-connection control is the effort...
Prevalence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems 3 February 2004
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1
Methods and Materials .................................................................................................... 2
Recruiting Participants ................................................................................................ 2
Training of the Contractor (Field Operations Manager) ............................................... 2
The Survey Form ........................................................................................................ 3
The Surveys ................................................................................................................ 4
The Data ..................................................................................................................... 5
Quality Control ............................................................................................................... 5
Quality Objectives and Criteria ................................................................................... 5
Special Training .......................................................................................................... 6
Documents and Records .............................................................................................. 6
Data Collection Method .............................................................................................. 7
Data Chain of Custody ................................................................................................ 7
Analytical methods...................................................................................................... 7
Instrument testing, inspection and maintenance ........................................................... 8
Inspection/ acceptance criteria..................................................................................... 8
Assessments and Response Actions............................................................................. 9
Reports to Management............................................................................................... 9
Reconciliation with User Requirements....................................................................... 9
Results and Discussion.................................................................................................... 9
Summary of Results Table ........................................................................................ 10
Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................. 10
Appendix A................................................................................................................... 12
The Survey Form ...................................................................................................... 13
Appendix B................................................................................................................... 17
The Recommendation Form ...................................................................................... 17
Appendix C................................................................................................................... 19
The Household Cross-Connections Brochure............................................................. 19
Appendix D................................................................................................................... 22
The Data Spreadsheet................................................................................................ 22
Page 1
Introduction
Cross-connection control is the effort to control interconnections between drinking water suppliesand non-potable substances or sources. Cross-connection control programs have been a part ofwater and health agency programs for decades. A concern of many agencies has been householdcross-connections. Although many haven’t considered the hazards in households to be a major areaof concern, it has, for the most part, remained an unknown factor in the cross-connection controlfield.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had funded an epidemiology study (the WaterEvaluation Trial, or WET Study) to determine the health effects of a home water treatment unit onthe residents of approximately 400 homes in four contiguous urban/suburban communities in the USMid West. All of the WET study participants lived in single-family homes. One of the concerns,which arose, was the possibility that the water could have been pure water when delivered to theresidence, but could have become contaminated through cross-connections on the premises. Thisquestion, in turn, led to the funding of this study, wherein approximately 200 of the above mentionedhomes were surveyed to determine whether the potential for cross-connections in the home existedand to assess whether cross-connections in the home could result in exposure to contaminants thatwould cause diarrhea or gastrointestinal illness, with the health effects being measured in the WETStudy.
Aside from providing valuable information for the Epidemiology study, this study provided a wealthof data regarding the type and prevalence of cross-connections in household plumbing systems. Thisreport encompasses only the findings of the household cross-connections study.
The Research Team
The Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research at the University of SouthernCalifornia was chosen to conduct this study. The Foundation was founded to work on the problemof cross-connections in 1944. Since that time, the Foundation has developed a standard for backflowprevention assemblies and has an approval program for backflow prevention assemblies, which iswidely accepted across the nation. The Foundation also publishes the Manual of Cross-ConnectionControl, and several training tools. The Foundation has offered the Course for the Training ofBackflow Prevention Assembly Testers since 1969, and has been offering the Course for the Trainingof Cross-Connection Control Program Specialists since 1987. More information on the Foundationcan be found at http://www.usc.edu/fccchr/
The USC Research Team included Prof. J. J. Lee, Ph.D., P.E as the Principal Investigator. Prof. Leeholds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the California Institute of Technology and is a registeredProfessional Engineer in the State of California. He is a Professor in Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at the University of Southern California and has been the Director of the Foundation forCross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research since 1985. Mr. Patrick Sylvester was theProject Manager. Mr. Sylvester holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a Masters in BusinessAdministration from the University of Southern California. He has been with the Foundation forover fifteen years working in the laboratory originally and more recently involved in administrativeactivities. Mr. Paul Schwartz was the Quality Assurance Manager for the project. Mr. Schwartzholds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Southern California and is a registeredProfessional Engineer in the State of California. He is currently the Foundation’s Chief Engineer
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 3 of 30
and has worked with the Foundation for over twenty-five years. The Field Operations Manager was Mr. Mark Witt. Mr. Witt is a licensed plumber in the State of Iowa and was contracted by the Foundation for this project. He has successfully completed the Foundation’s Course for the Training of Cross-Connection Control Program Specialists and is the owner of Backflow Prevention Services of Iowa. Research Team Member Mr. Henry Chang holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a Masters in Materials Engineering from the University of Southern California. He has been with the Foundation for over seventeen years. Methods and Materials Recruiting Participants The participants in the WET study were informed about the study on household cross-connections via a letter from the WET Research Team as soon as EPA granted Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. The letter briefly outlined the study and asked the interested participants to contact USC at a toll free number or return a postage-paid postcard to USC. The letter also mentioned that the participants would receive $50.00 for their part in the project. In order for participants to be eligible to participate in this study, it was important to obtain informed consent. The participates were informed of the study, what was involved, what their part would be and what the compensation entailed. The participants were also made aware of any negative impact the study could have on them, such as the need to replace or modify certain components of the household plumbing system and the were informed of the benefits that could be gained by the survey of their plumbing system. They would be made aware of any potential hazards to their drinking water system and they would be informed as to how to go about making needed corrections. The complete letter may be found in Appendix A. The WET participants who contacted USC were given an explanation of the study over the phone and those who were interested were sent a personalized letter, a fact sheet about the study, and the Informed Consent Form. They were asked to respond within three weeks to confirm their participation in the study. As the participants responded, the USC Research Team e-mailed this information to the WET Research Team. The WET Research Team provided the dates these participants were to have their Point of Use (POU) water treatment devices removed. The WET Research Team also provided an ID number so that identifying information could be eliminated from the data supplied back to the WET Research Team. This was necessary to maintain the blind analysis required in the WET Study. The original goal was to conduct a site survey of the residential plumbing system shortly after the POU device was removed from service. The USC team sent out a letter to the participants notifying them of their acceptance into the project. They were given the name of the contractor and informed that the contractor would contact them directly, to schedule the specific appointment to conduct the survey of the household water uses. Contact information was forwarded to the contractor to facilitate scheduling of the site surveys. Training of the Contractor (Field Operations Manager) The USC Research Team contracted with a plumbing contractor for the position of Field Operations Manager (FOM). The required qualifications included cross-connection control experience, training to conduct the water use surveys, and maintaining a state-issued contractor’s license. The contractor had been trained at the Course for the Training of Cross-Connection Control Program Specialists offered by USC, and taught by members of the USC Research Team for this project. This ensured
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 4 of 30
Page 3
that the contractor was already aware of the USC Research Team’s methods and understanding ofcross-connections and degrees of hazard
This Field Operations Manager (FOM) performing the actual survey received additional training andinstruction from the USC Research Team to ensure proper protocol was followed
Scope of the survey— The survey was to identify actual and potential cross-connectionswithin and around the household. This was to involve examining plumbing fixtures such as:toilet tanks, irrigation systems, sump pumps, boilers, water heaters, spas, swimming pools,etc.
Data Collection—The contractor was instructed on the use of the site survey form (developedfor this project) detailing each item on the form, including additional comments, whichshould be added to the form. The security and chain of custody of the data as covered in theproject protocol was conveyed to the contractor. The Quality Assurance Manager (QAM)from the USC Research Team accompanied the FOM on the first several surveys. Thisclarified the method in which specific information would be transferred to the survey formand it ensured that the FOM understood exactly what information the USC Research Teamneeded for the project. Midway through the surveys the QAM again accompanied the FOMon several surveys to verify methods and techniques of data collection. All data forms weresent to the USC Research Team via FAX each Monday morning, and the originals were sentto the USC Team via a traceable shipping service. The contractor did not keep a copy of thesurvey form. All recommendations made to the customer where documented on the surveyform.
Interacting with the participants—The contractor was instructed on how to communicatewith the participant and those in the household. A professional, courteous demeanor was tobe maintained at all times. The contractor was to follow all guidelines required by theInstitutional Review Board and those spelled-out in the protocol. The customer was to beinformed of the findings of the survey. The contractor was instructed to give some briefadvice or recommendations and explain the benefits of correcting any problems discovered.The contractor was not permitted to offer his own services to make any plumbing changes.The contractor was not permitted, in any way, to accept any business from the participants asa result of this research project, nor was the contractor to inform anyone other than USC ofthe results of the survey, unless authorized to do so by USC. If it were to be necessary tomake changes to the plumbing system, the contractor informed the customer. If a cross-connection were to be discovered, which was considered a serious threat to the quality of thewater, the contractor was to notify the customer and the USC team immediately.
The Survey Form
The USC Research Team developed a survey form for the FOM to use during the surveys. The formwould help the USC Research Team ascertain the following:
• The number of unprotected water uses (i.e., cross-connections) as compared to the total wateruses on the premises.
• The degree of hazard of the cross-connections discovered• If the cross-connections were direct or indirect cross-connections
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 5 of 30
Page 4
The Survey Form was designed in such a way as to facilitate the gathering of all the necessaryinformation during the site survey. It was also necessary that the data would be collected andrecorded consistently, and could be transferred to a spreadsheet which would provide the bestinformation for the USC Research Team as well as the WET Study Research Team. The surveyform was divided in to several categories. In each category it was determined if there was a cross-connection, and if so, whether it was direct or indirect. It was also determined if the cross-connection was with a fluid that could present a health hazard or whether it should be classified as anon-health hazard. The connection was ascertained to be either temporary or permanent, and it wasdetermined whether the cross-connection was protected and if the protection was acceptable. Thecategories included on the survey form were: Auxiliary Water Supplies, Fire Sprinkler Systems,Irrigation Systems, Heating/Cooling Equipment, Kitchen Facilities, Laundry Facilities, SewageSystems Swimming Pools/Spas, Tanks, Vats, other Vessels, and hose bibs. There was also a sectionfor additional connections not specifically mentioned on the form. Additionally, there was a sectionto note any chemicals, which were observed on the premises. The survey forms also indicated thecontractor’s time-in and time-out. After the initial set of surveys were in the QAM accompanied theFOM on the surveys, the Survey Form was modified slightly in order to clarify findings and ensurewhat was discovered on the surveys would be understood by the Research Team analyzing thesurveys. The finalized Survey Form is shown in Appendix A. Accompanying the survey form wasa separate form for recommendations. This was a triplicate form. The recommendations forcorrections where included on this form. The participant was given one copy and the other twocopies were forwarded to the USC Research Team. Additionally, the information wascommunicated to the local administrative authority(s), in those few cases where the seriousness ofthe cross-connection warranted. This form is shown in Appendix B. The FOM was not permitted tooffer his own services to make any plumbing changes. The FOM could, in no way, accept anybusiness from the participants as a result of this research project, nor was the FOM to recommendother contractors. When there were corrections to be made to the plumbing system, because of aserious threat to the water supply, the FOM informed the customer that the administrative authoritywould be notified. The FOM provided the participant with contact information for the localplumbing authority and the water supplier, should they desire more information on how to go aboutcorrecting any of the plumbing problems. If no unprotected cross-connections were discovered, theFOM informed the participant of this. The FOM, at that point, answered any of the participant’squestions.
The Surveys
Once the participants confirmed their willingness to participate and their agreement to theinformation provided on the Informed Consent Form, the FOM made specific appointments directlywith the participants via telephone. The FOM confirmed the appointments the day before the actualsurvey and confirmed that an adult would be present in the home at the time of the survey.
The FOM arrived at the site at the pre-scheduled time and date. After a brief review with theparticipant, the FOM began the water use survey using the survey form provided by the USCResearch Team. The various water uses were examined as outlined on the survey form. One adultwas asked to spend approximately 30-60 minutes accompanying the FOM as he performed thesurvey.
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 6 of 30
Page 5
To protect participants in the study from unsolicited calls from plumbing contractors, the USC FieldOperations Manager agreed not to provide any information on the survey or the names ofparticipants to anyone except USC.
At the conclusion of the survey, the FOM delivered a check in the amount of $50.00 from USCmade out to the participant. The FOM also delivered a brochure explaining common householdcross-connections and explaining what the resident could do to abate cross-connections in the home.This brochure is shown in Appendix C.
The Data
The Survey Forms were faxed to the USC Research Team each Monday morning following the sitesurveys. The originals were sent at the same time via UPS, in order to be traceable. The FOM didnot keep a copy of the survey form or provide information on individual surveys to anyone exceptUSC.
Three members of the USC Research Team scored each survey independently of one another andplaced the data on a spreadsheet. The QAM compared the individual scores and, when necessary,discussed specific scores, going back to the original survey forms in order to gain a consensus for thescoring. Once a consensus was reached, the data was entered into a master spreadsheet. Once amember of the Research Team entered the data, another member confirmed the entries to ensureaccuracy in data entry. The spreadsheet included the number of protected cross-connections ascompared with the number of total water uses within each category. For example 3/4 in the kitchenfacility would indicate that there were four water uses and three of them were protected. The degreeof hazard, and type of cross-connection (direct or indirect) was also indicated for the residence as awhole, with worst-case scenario being indicated. For example if there were both non-health hazardsand health hazards, the degree of hazard indicated would be health hazard. Likewise, if there weredirect and indirect cross-connections the form would indicate a direct cross-connection for theresidence.
The final number of surveys completed was 188. Once the data was analyzed and the data input inthe spreadsheet, the spreadsheet was sent to the WET Study Research Team at the University ofCalifornia, Berkeley for inclusion in the WET Study.
Quality Control
Quality Objectives and Criteria
A major objective was to obtain consistent and accurate information regarding the water uses withinthe participating homes. After extensive training and discussions with the USC Research Team, theFOM conducted the surveys in accordance with the training. The QAM accompanied the FOM onthe first several surveys to ensure consistency in the survey and in the completion of the surveyreport and in the understanding of various household cross-connections. After approximately onehalf of the surveys were conducted the QAM accompanied the FOM on several more surveys toensure consistency.
When the data forms were returned to USC, three members of the USC research team analyzed thedata forms independently to determine the degree of hazard present on the premises, if any. The
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 7 of 30
Page 6
Research Team followed procedures based on the USC training course, Course for the Training ofCross-Connection Control Program Specialist, of which the members of the USC Research Teamare instructors. Specifically, the type of cross-connection (direct or indirect) and the degree ofhazard were determined.
Special Training
The FOM was required to have successfully completed the five-day training course, Course for theTraining of Cross-Connection Control Program Specialists conducted by the University of SouthernCalifornia. Since the FOM was a contractor working within Iowa, this training was necessary toensure that the FOM had full understanding of the Research Teams methods and concepts of cross-connection control. The FOM was also required to maintain a contractor’s license in the State ofIowa.
Documents and Records
The FOM sent all field survey forms via FAX to the USC Research Team each Monday morningfollowing the completion of the survey. The original survey forms were shipped via UPS eachweek. The FOM did not maintain copies of the survey forms or provide information on individualsurveys to anyone except USC.
The survey form was modified slightly to clarify information regarding the household bathrooms asrecommended by the QAM following initial field testing of the survey form. In the original form,bathrooms 1, 2, and 3 were listed under Toilets/Bidets. In the modified form bathrooms 1, 2, and 3were listed with bathtub/shower and toilet/bidet listed as subcategories under each bathroom. Thisclarified what was discovered at each location. The change was made to make the data recordingeasier and more consistent. On the first several survey forms, the data was recorded, but writtenexplanations were needed in some cases to clarify which toilets were reflected in the data.
The QAM distributed the forms to three members of the USC Research Team for independentassessment. The members of the USC Research Team assessed each survey form recording thenumber of water uses and number of protected water uses at each residence. These were subdividedinto the categories listed on the survey form. The degree of hazard for each category was assessedand a determination was made as to whether the cross-connection hazard was a direct (subject tobacksiphonage and/or backpressure) or an indirect (subject to backsiphonage only) cross-connection.Each assessor summarized his findings on a spreadsheet, which was submitted to the QualityAssurance Manager for review. When the research team members arrived at conflictingassessments, the QAM discussed the issues in question to bring about a consensus. There were arelatively small number of instances that required the QAM to clarify situations in order to bringconsensus. These situations, typically, required clarification of specific plumbing fixtures and howthey were engineered. Once this information was brought to the attention of the Research Teammembers, consensus was forthcoming. Once a consensus was reached the data was entered into anExcel spreadsheet by one of the research team members. Once the data was entered, anothermember of the research team checked the data entry point by point with each of the research teammembers signing off on the data as it was entered for each household.
The data was e-mailed to the UCB Project Manager for use in the WET Study as it becameavailable.
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 8 of 30
Page 7
Electronically stored records were automatically backed up on a mirrored hard drive. Additionally,the mirrored hard drive was backed up to tape weekly.
Data Collection Method
The FOM arrived at the participant’s home at a prescheduled time. After a brief explanation of whathe would be doing, he, accompanied by an adult member of the household, proceeded to survey thewater uses. He looked at sinks, toilets, irrigation systems, water heaters, boilers, water softeners, andany other water using equipment to determine if there were protected and/or unprotected cross-connections present. The surveyor indicated on the survey form what was discovered. The surveyform may be found in Appendix B. Although the form is fairly exhaustive, there is a section on thesurvey form for other water uses that the surveyor may have discovered. These too were recordedon the survey form. The FOM determined if the cross-connection(s) were subject to backpressure orbacksiphonage. The FOM also indicated what type of substance could have backflowed through thecross-connection(s). The FOM indicated what type of backflow protection was present, if any, andif the installation was correct. This information, as well as other observations, which may affect thehydraulic conditions of the household, such as number of stories, elevation relative to surroundingareas, etc., was recorded on the survey form. A separate triplicate form (Appendix B) was used toadvise the resident of any recommendations to correct cross-connections, which were discovered. Acopy was given to the customer, and the remaining copies were forwarded to USC with the originalsurvey forms. In situations where a serious cross-connection hazard existed, which could havethreatened the public water supply, a copy was forwarded to the Iowa American Water Company. Inseventeen cases a direct cross-connection with a health hazard was discovered. Fourteen of thesewere direction connections to the sewer via improperly plumbed, or unacceptable toilet fixtures.Two were direct connections to the drain via improperly installed water softeners and the remainingcross-connection was a direct connection to an on-site well. The last three of these instances weredetermined to be severe enough to contact the water supplier, the Iowa American Water Company.
Data Chain of Custody
The FOM sent all field survey forms via FAX to the USC Research Team each Monday of the weekfollowing the completion of the survey. The original survey forms were shipped via UPS. TheFOM did not maintain copies of these forms.
The data was detailed in an Excel file and e-mailed to the UCB Project Manager for use in the WETStudy. Identifying information was not included with the data other than a specific ID number. TheWET Study had been a triple blind study, and to ensure the WET Study team did not receiveidentifying information, the ID numbers were used.
Analytical methods
According to the Manual of Cross-Connection Control, Ninth Edition, a cross-connection is definedas “any unprotected actual or potential connection or structural arrangement between a public or aconsumer’s potable water system and any other source or system through which it is possible tointroduce into any part of the potable system any used water, industrial fluid, gas or substance otherthan the intended potable water with which the system is supplied.” If the cross-connection issubject to backsiphonage only, it is considered an indirect cross-connection. A connection, which issubject to backsiphonage and backpressure, is considered a direct cross connection. The FOMdescribed the type of cross-connection discovered and determined if there is adequate protection,
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 9 of 30
Page 8
such as a vacuum breaker on the connection. The FOM followed conventions for types of cross-connections discussed in the USC Course for the Training of Cross-Connection Control ProgramSpecialists and conventions discussed specifically with the USC Research team. These conventionswere verified and confirmed in the first few surveys where the FOM was accompanied by the QAMto ensure consistency. In the initial surveys the FOM and QAM surveyed the property together, butcompleted the survey form separately. Afterward the forms were compared to determine if therewere any discrepancies and discuss the reasons for such discrepancies. There were somediscrepancies in recording the data, which were eliminated after the first few surveys. Thediscrepancies were minor and would not actually have made a difference in the data reporting.Midway through the project the QAM accompanied the FOM on several more surveys to confirmquality assurance guidelines were being followed and to ensure consistency in the data collectionmethod. During these surveys there were no discrepancies.
Hazards were designated as a health hazard, a non-health hazard, or a non-hazard. A health hazardcross-connection is a cross-connection between the potable water supply and a substance that maycause illness or death if ingested. Sewage would be considered a health hazard as well as chemicaladditives used in boilers, and other systems. A cross-connection to a well would normally beconsidered a health hazard, unless the well was accepted by the local health authority as anacceptable drinking water supply. An unprotected hose bibb is normally considered to be a cross-connection with a health hazard, since the end of the hose can be easily dropped into a number ofunknown substances such as ponds, fertilizer, pesticides, etc. A non-health hazard cross-connectionis a connection between the potable water supply and an aesthetically objectionable materiel, whichwould not cause illness or death if ingested. This could be a substance that may change the color,smell or taste of the water without compromising the quality from a health perspective.
The FOM will define the cross-connections and what substance is subject to backflow (e.g., toiletwater, spa water, etc.). Three members of the USC Research Team analyzed the survey formsindependently to make an assessment of the degree of hazard. Discrepancies were eliminated by theQAM bringing clarity to the forms, mostly by defining specific plumbing fixtures such as toiletfixtures. Once the data was analyzed and the types of cross-connections and degrees of hazarddetermined, the data was compiled and is summarized in the Results and Conclusions section of thisreport. The data was also forwarded to the UCB Research Team for incorporation into the WetStudy.
Instrument testing, inspection and maintenance
The only instrument used in this study is the survey form, which has gone through several reviewsby those involved in the WET Study and those involved in this study. After the initial surveys withthe QAM and the FOM, some minor adjustments, were necessary to ensure clarity, accuracy andconsistency in the reporting of data.
Inspection/ acceptance criteria
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 10 of 30
Page 9
The data from the survey forms was accepted for use in the study unless there was unclear data. TheQA Manager reviewed the data for clarity upon receipt. When there were unclear points, the QAManager contacted the FOM requesting clarification. There was no need to eliminate any data asclarity was obtained in each case.
Assessments and Response Actions
On several occasions, the USC Research Team conducted a conference call with the UCB ResearchTeam and the EPA Project Officer, as well as other stakeholders in the WET Study, to review thedata submitted during the previous month(s). The USC Project Manager was in contact with theWET Study Project Manager on a regular basis as the need arose to ensure the delivery of data in aform useful to the WET Study Team and to discuss specific issues as they arose.
Reports to Management
Quarterly progress reports were made to the Environmental Protection Agency via the EPA ProjectOfficer for this study. Project status, performance evaluation, periodic data quality assessments, anyQA problems were addressed in regular telephone conversations, quarterly status reports and email.
Reconciliation with User Requirements
The USC Research Team worked closely with the UCB Research Team during the initial design ofthe study and throughout the data collection process to ensure that the cross-connection survey datamet the needs of the UCB WET Study. The development of the survey form was coordinatedbetween the USC, and UCB Research Teams. The summary spreadsheets were modified after thefirst group of surveys to serve the needs of the WET Study team. The cross-connections found inthe bathrooms were divided into bathroom cross-connections and toilet cross-connections. The USCResearch Team met with the Wet Study Project Manager after the initial surveys. At this meeting itwas determined that cross-connections involving the toilets would be more pertinent to the WETStudy. The data was contained in the original survey forms, but had not been separated on the initialspreadsheets forwarded to the WET Study Team. At this point, using the original data, the summaryspreadsheet was modified to distinguish between toilet cross-connections and other bathroom cross-connections.
Results and Discussion
Surveys of household plumbing systems were conducted on 188 homes of those involved in theWET Study from May of 2002 to January of 2003. Homes found to have direct cross-connections toa health hazard constituted 9.6% of the homes. On average 73% of water uses were unprotected,constituting cross-connections. Only 4.3% of the homes had either no unprotected cross-connections or unprotected cross-connections to a non-hazardous substance. Homes with a cross-connection (either direct or indirect) to a health hazard constituted 95.7% of the homes. Althoughthis is a large percentage, the greatest concern was with the 9.6% of the homes having a direct cross-connection to a health hazard. In most cases these cross-connections were due to improperlyplumbed toilet fixtures, or specific toilet fixtures which could create a backpressure situation andforce hazardous water from the toilet tank into the drinking water supply. 91% of the homescontained unprotected hose bibs, which are considered an indirect cross-connection to a healthhazard, due to the potential for connecting hose bibs to any substance within reach of a hose. 61%
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 11 of 30
Page 10
of the homes contained unprotected cross-connections involving the toilets with 8.8% of these beingdirect cross-connections. Cross-Connections to tanks, vats or water softeners were found in 5.9% ofthe homes. Of these, 18.2% were direct cross-connections to health hazards. Unprotected cross-connections to health hazards within the heating/cooling system were discovered in 43.6% of thehomes. Only one home had an unprotected irrigation system of the five that had an irrigationsystem. The detailed spreadsheet covering each cross-connection for each residence is exhibited inAppendix D.
Summary of Results Table
Percentageof Homes
Condition Determined
9.6% Direct cross-connection to a health hazard73% of all water uses unprotected4.3% All cross-connections protected or, if unprotected, was a non-health
hazard95.7% Direct or indirect cross-connection to a health hazard91% Unprotected hose bibs at the residence61% Unprotected cross-connections involving toilets (8.8% of these were
direct.)5.9% Of homes had cross-connections to tanks, vats, or water softeners18.2% Of the cross-connections to tanks, vats or water softeners were direct
connections43.6% Of homes had heating/cooling system cross-connections
Conclusions and Recommendations
The results indicate that there are a large number of unprotected cross-connections in the home.Many of these cross-connections can be corrected by simple measures, such as a hose bib vacuumbreaker or the change in a toilet fixture. Other problems which may occur, such as a direct cross-connection to the sewer via a water softener would require some additional plumbing work toalleviate. The fact that 73% of all water uses were through unprotected cross-connections indicatesthat there is a significant chance for backflow to occur should the hydraulic conditions change.Events that are not uncommon such as a water main break or fire hydrant use (for firefighting orflushing) would drop the pressure at the incident to atmospheric pressure. Pressure in the pipingsystem elevated above the main break could drop to sub-atmospheric levels. In such cases backflowwould occur through these unprotected cross-connections. A problem within the home could alsooccur should the water supply to the home be shut-off for any maintenance reason. If a tap at alower elevation were opened, backflow would occur through an unprotected cross-connection.
This study indicates, first of all, that further study is needed in other areas of the nation. This projectincluded homes in one water system in Iowa. There were only five irrigation systems, no pools, orspas, and no fire sprinkler systems. Additionally, the homes were, in general, older homes and theywere all single-family dwellings. Irrigations systems which are common in some parts of thecountry, could easily contribute to the potential for backflow occurrences in residences. Pools andSpas are also potential sources of contamination, depending upon the design of the system for fillingand/or make-up water.
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 12 of 30
Page 11
Although data on the age of the home was only obtainable of 83 of the homes the average home agewas almost fifty years old. Studies of newer homes may show homes are better protected.
Another recommendation would be for water agencies to increase their efforts in the area of publiceducation. While almost every home had a cross-connection with a health hazard present few of theresidents had any idea of the potential hazards. Most of the cross-connections discovered could beabated with a few dollars and a few minutes, but residents where unaware of the hazards existing intheir own plumbing system.
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 13 of 30
Appendix A
The Initial Letter from USC
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 14 of 30
24 January 2002
Thank you for expressing interest in the study, “Prevalence of Cross-Connections inHousehold Plumbing,” conducted by the University of Southern California. The researchproject is being conducted in coordination with the Iowa-American Water Company andthe University of California, Berkeley WET (Water Evaluation Trial) Study, in whichyou have participated.
The purpose of this study will be to survey your household plumbing system to determineif there are any cross-connections in your home. A cross-connection is a connectionbetween the drinking water plumbing system and any other source, which may contributeto the degradation of the quality of the drinking water. A brochure entitled WorkingTogether for Safe Water is enclosed to help you understand what cross-connections are.A professional cross-connection control specialist will survey your plumbing system anddetermine if there exist any unprotected cross-connections in the system. One adult fromyour household will be asked to spend about 30-60 minutes accompanying the specialistas the survey is performed.
The information obtained will be valuable to the WET Study, the water distributionindustry and to you. You will be informed of any connections in your plumbing system,which may permit other substances to enter your plumbing system and, thus, degrade thequality of your drinking water. You will be informed as to how to make the correctionsnecessary to protect your drinking water from these interconnections. These correctionsmay be as simple as replacing a part in your toilet tank, or installing a hose bib vacuumbreaker. Once such corrections are made, or if no problems are discovered, you can besure that you’ve done your part in protecting you, your family, neighbors and the waterdistribution system as a whole. At the end of the survey, the specialist will present youwith a check for $50.00 for your participation in this study.
Although it is likely that no unprotected cross-connections will be discovered in yourhome, your participation will allow you to gain greater insight in understanding yourhousehold water system.
We thank you for your interest in this study and look forward to your participation. I’msure you will find the information obtained useful and interesting. To confirm yourdecision to participate in this study, you will need to read and agree to the enclosedInformed Consent Form and contact our office by calling toll-free 866-545-6340.Contacting our office signifies you agree to the enclosed Informed Consent Form. Pleasecontact our office within three weeks.
Thank you again for your participation and if you have any questions, please contact ouroffice at the phone number above or e-mail [email protected].
Sincerely,
J. J. Lee, Ph.D., P.E.Director
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 15 of 30
Appendix B
The Survey Form
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 16 of 30
Prevalence of Cross-Connections in Household PlumbingSurvey Form
Survey LocationName Mr. Mrs. Miss _________________________________________________
Street Address ____________________________________________________
City ____________________________State ________ Zip_________________Phone (______)__________________ FAX (______) ____________________
Contact person upon arrival Mr. Mrs. Miss _____________________________
Arrival Time _________ am/pm Departure Time __________ am/pm
Service Connection(s) & Number Water Meter Size
o Domestic _____ o 5/8” o _” o 1” o other ______o Irrigation _____ o 5/8” o _” o 1” o other ______o Fire _____ o 5/8” o _” o 1” o other ______
Building Height - Number of Stories: o One o Two o Three Basement: o Yes o No
Water Usage
Cross-Connection?No
Yes - Direct orIndirect
ProtectionAG, AVB,PVB, SVBRP, DC,
DuCh,DCAP(1)
InstallationAcceptable
(2)
Permanent orTemporary
(3)
No Dir Ind Yes No Perm Temp
o Auxiliary water supply o Water well- pressuretank o o o o o o o
o Storage tank o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Fire Sprinkler System o Anti-freeze o o o o o o o o Storage tank o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Irrigation System o o o o o o o o Chemical Injection o o o o o o o o Booster Pumps o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
USC ID # __________________
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 17 of 30
Cross-Conn ProperWater Usage
No Dir Ind
Type ofProtection
Yes NoPerm Temp
o Heating/Cooling Equipment o Water Heater T& P Valve oYes oNo o o o o o o o
o Boiler o o o o o o o o Geo-thermal heating o o o o o o o o Heat Exchanger o o o o o o o o Humidifier o o o o o o o o Hydronic Heat o o o o o o o o Snow Melt System o o o o o o o o Solar Heating o o o o o o o o Water cooled equip o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Kitchen Facilities o Faucet o o o o o o o o Pull out spray head o o o o o o o o Dishwasher - Inlet o o o o o o o Outlet o o o o o o o o Icemaker o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Laundry o Washing machine o o o o o o o o Wash Sink o o o o o o o o Portable Equipment o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Sewage System o Sewage Ejectors o o o o o o o o RV Flushing Facilities o o o o o o o o Bathroom #1 - Sink o o o o o o o o Bathtub/Shower o o o o o o o o Toilet/Bidet o o o o o o o
o Bathroom #2 - Sink o o o o o o o o Bathtub/Shower o o o o o o o o Toilet/Bidet o o o o o o o
o Bathroom #3 - Sink o o o o o o o o Bathtub/Shower o o o o o o o o Toilet/Bidet o o o o o o o
o Other _______________ o o o o o o oComments:
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 18 of 30
Cross-Conn Proper
Water Usage No Dir IndType of
Protection Yes No Perm Temp
o Swimming Pool/Spa o Fill Line o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Tanks, Vats, other Vessels o Water Softener - Inlet o o o o o o o Outlet o o o o o o o o Other _______________ o o o o o o o
Comments:
o Outdoor Hose bibbso #1 - o o o o o o oo #2 - o o o o o o oo #3 - o o o o o o oo #4 - o o o o o o o
o Other _______________ o o o o o o oComments:
Other Actual or Potential Cross-Connections :
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Type of Chemicals observed on-site:____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Surveyor _______________________________
Signature _____________________________
Date of Survey _________________________
All internal cross-connectionsprotected?
o Yes
o No
USC Research Team Transferred toData Base
Type of Cross- Conn Hazard Date:_________________o Indirect o Non-Healtho Direct o Health By:
___________________
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 19 of 30
Attachment #1
Detailing for Survey Form
(1) Protection - Type of Backflow Protection PresentAG - Air gap
Break - Air break
AVB- Atmospheric Vacuum Breaker
PVB - Pressure Vacuum BreakerSVB - Spill-Resistant Pressure Vacuum BreakerRP - Reduced Pressure Principle AssemblyDC - Double Check Valve AssemblyDuCh - Dual CheckDCAP - Dual Check with Atmospheric Port
(2) Installation Acceptable -
Yes - General compliance with installation criteria (ref - Iowa Plumbing Code)Proper Elevation for AVB, PVB, SVBProper ClearancesAccessibility for testing/maintenance
No - Non-compliance with installation criteria
(3) Permanent or Temporary Connection
Perm - Permanently or rigidly affixed with piping/tubing
Temp - Temporary connection
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 20 of 30
Appendix C
The Recommendation Form
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 21 of 30
Prevalence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing
Recommended Corrections
Thank you for participation in this important study. During the water usesurvey of your residence, the surveyor has identified actual or potentialcross connections. Below are suggested recommendations to correctthese cross connections.
Water Usage Location Cross connectionRecommended
Correction *
* 1. Install approved/listed hose bib vacuum breaker 2. Install approved/listed antisiphon ballcock 3. Install approved/listed reduced pressure principle backflow preventionassembly
Distribution:Original – USCYellow – ParticipantBlue – City of Davenport or BettendorfRed – Iowa-American WaterPrevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 22 of 30
Appendix D
The Household Cross-Connections Brochure
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 23 of 30
��
��
��
��
REC
IRC
ULA
TIN
GPU
MP
BA
CK
FLO
WPR
EVEN
TER
IF B
AC
KFL
OW
PR
EVEN
TER
IS N
OT
PRES
ENT,
PR
ESSU
RE
IN B
OIL
ER M
AY
EXC
EED
TH
E PR
ESSU
RE
IN T
HE
WA
TER
LIN
E A
ND
FLO
W B
AC
KW
AR
DS
BO
ILER
[NO
T TO
BE
CO
NFU
SED
WIT
H D
OM
ESTI
C W
ATE
RH
EATE
R]
Pre
vale
nce
of
Cro
ss-C
on
nect
ion
sin H
ou
seh
old
Plu
mb
ing
We
wo
uld
like
to
th
ank
you
fo
r p
arti
cip
atin
gin
th
is w
ater
-use
su
rvey
. Th
e p
urp
ose
of
the
stu
dy
is t
o c
on
du
ct a
wat
er-u
se s
urv
ey t
od
eter
min
e if
th
ere
are
any
un
pro
tect
edcr
oss
-co
nn
ecti
on
s p
rese
nt
in t
he
ho
use
ho
ldp
lum
bin
g s
yste
m.
A c
ross
-co
nn
ecti
on
is a
con
nec
tio
n b
etw
een
th
e d
rin
kin
g w
ater
plu
mb
ing
sys
tem
an
d a
ny
oth
er s
ou
rce,
wh
ich
may
co
ntr
ibu
te t
o t
he
deg
rad
atio
n o
fth
e q
ual
ity
of
the
dri
nki
ng
wat
er.
DR
INK
ING
WA
TE
RCONTAM
INANTS
You
r lo
cal w
ater
co
mp
any,
hea
lth
, an
d b
uild
-in
g a
nd
saf
ety
dep
artm
ents
wo
rk h
ard
to
pro
vid
e th
e sa
fest
wat
er p
oss
ible
to
yo
ur
ho
me.
Ho
wev
er, o
nce
th
is w
ater
en
ters
yo
ur
pro
per
ty, t
her
e ar
e co
mm
on
pro
ble
ms
that
may
ari
se d
ue
to im
pro
per
ch
ang
es in
, or
mis
use
of,
yo
ur
plu
mb
ing
sys
tem
.
Du
rin
g t
he
revi
ew o
f th
e va
rio
us
use
s o
f w
a-te
r w
ith
in y
ou
r h
ou
seh
old
, so
me
of
the
fol-
low
ing
may
hav
e b
een
fo
un
d.
This
bro
chu
reis
inte
nd
ed t
o p
rovi
de
som
e ad
dit
ion
al in
for-
mat
ion
to
an
swer
yo
ur
qu
esti
on
s.
Ho
se b
ibb
sH
ose
bib
bs
are
par
t o
f o
ur
ever
yday
life
.Th
ey a
llow
us
to h
oo
k u
p a
gar
den
ho
se t
ow
ater
th
e p
lan
ts, w
ash
th
e ca
r, cl
ean
ou
t th
eg
utt
ers,
fill
th
e sw
imm
ing
po
ol,
etc.
Ho
w-
ever
, eve
ry t
ime
you
co
nn
ect
a g
ard
en h
ose
to a
ho
se b
ibb
, yo
u a
re e
xten
din
g t
he
end
of
the
wat
er li
ne.
To
mak
e su
re t
hat
no
har
m-
ful m
ater
ials
are
dra
wn
bac
k in
to t
he
gar
den
ho
se, a
vac
uu
m b
reak
er s
ho
uld
be
inst
alle
do
n e
ach
ho
se b
ibb
. Wh
en t
he
ho
se b
ibb
isex
po
sed
to
fre
ezin
g c
on
dit
ion
s, m
ake
sure
to
use
a s
elf-
dra
inin
g, f
rost
-pro
of
vacu
um
bre
aker
.
���
HO
SE B
IBB
VA
CU
UM
BR
EAK
ER
Bo
ilers
Du
e to
th
e p
ress
ure
th
at m
ay b
uild
up
insi
de
of
a b
oile
r, th
e p
ress
ure
of
the
bo
iler
wat
erm
ay e
xcee
d t
hat
of
the
wat
er f
eed
ing
th
eb
oile
r. T
he
bo
iler
wat
er (
wh
ich
may
be
chem
ical
ly t
reat
ed w
ith
po
iso
no
us
anti
-co
r-ro
sio
n c
om
po
un
ds,
etc
.) m
ay b
e p
ush
ed, o
rb
ackp
ress
ure
d, i
nto
th
e m
ake-
up
wat
er li
ne.
This
ch
emic
ally
co
nta
min
ated
wat
er m
ay b
efo
rced
bac
k in
to y
ou
r h
om
e’s
po
tab
le w
ater
syst
em, u
nle
ss t
her
e is
an
ap
pro
pri
ate
bac
kflo
w p
reve
nte
r th
at is
des
ign
ed f
or
bac
kpre
ssu
re.
Fou
ndat
ion
for
Cro
ss-C
onne
ctio
nC
ontr
ol a
ndH
ydra
ulic
Res
earc
h
2002
© U
niv
ersi
ty o
f So
uth
ern
Cal
ifo
rnia
������
SELF
DR
AIN
ING
, FR
OST
PRO
OF
VA
CU
UM
BR
EAK
ER
NO
TEM
ake s
ure
to
use
on
ly l
iste
d o
r ap
pro
ved
pro
du
cts.
S
ho
uld
yo
u h
ave a
ny q
uest
ion
sre
gard
ing
th
e s
ele
ctio
n o
r in
stall
ati
on
of
pro
per
back
flo
w p
rote
ctio
n,
check
wit
h y
ou
rlo
cal
city
bu
ild
ing
an
d s
afe
ty d
ep
art
men
t.
RA
DIA
TOR
LOC
AL
CO
NTA
CTS
Iow
a-A
mer
ican
Wat
er C
om
pan
yM
r. B
rock
Ear
nh
ard
t(5
63)
324-
3264
Cit
y o
f D
aven
po
rt -
Mr.
Bill
Mill
er(5
63)
326-
7745
Cit
y o
f B
ette
nd
orf
- M
r. Jo
e C
reek
(563
) 34
4-40
74
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 24 of 30
FAU
CET
OR
SPO
UT
SIN
K,
TUB
, TA
NK
,W
ATE
RIN
G T
RO
UG
H
OV
ERFL
OW
RIM
OR
ED
GE
PHY
SIC
AL
SEPA
RA
TIO
NO
R “
AIR
GA
P”
- TY
PIC
ALL
YM
INIM
UM
OF
1-IN
CH
WR
ON
G!!
HO
SE S
UB
MER
GED
IN T
RO
UG
H -
NO
“A
IR-G
AP”
Ou
r H
om
es.
..H
ave
you
eve
r co
nsi
der
ed a
ll o
f th
e p
lace
sth
at y
ou
use
wat
er in
yo
ur
ho
me?
Yo
u m
ayb
e su
rpri
sed
ho
w m
any
dif
fere
nt
way
s th
atw
ater
can
be
use
d, a
nd
po
ssib
ly m
isu
sed
.
This
bro
chu
re d
iscu
sses
a f
ew o
f th
e u
ses
of
wat
er t
hat
yo
u m
igh
t w
ant
to p
ay m
ore
at-
ten
tio
n t
o in
ord
er t
o p
rote
ct t
he
pu
rity
of
the
wat
er y
ou
dri
nk,
co
ok
wit
h, o
r b
ath
in.
Let’
s lo
ok
at a
few
exa
mp
les.
Sin
ks,
Tu
bs,
Tan
ks
The
fau
cets
in y
ou
r b
ath
roo
m o
r ki
tch
enm
ust
be
loca
ted
so
th
at t
he
end
of
the
fau
-ce
t is
ab
ove
th
e o
verf
low
leve
l of
the
sin
k o
rtu
b.
Fill
lines
to
wat
er t
rou
gh
s o
r ta
nks
mu
stal
so b
e p
hys
ical
ly s
epar
ated
or
“air
-gap
ped
.”If
th
ere
is n
o a
ir-g
ap, t
hen
th
e co
nte
nts
of
the
sin
k, t
ub
, or
tan
k m
ay b
e su
cked
or
“bac
ksip
ho
ned
” in
to t
he
wat
er li
ne
du
rin
g a
loss
of
wat
er p
ress
ure
.
Toil
ets
Toile
ts n
eed
wat
er t
o f
lush
th
e w
aste
mat
e-ri
al in
to t
he
sew
er s
yste
m.
The
wat
er t
hat
flu
shes
th
e to
ilet
ente
rs in
to t
he
toile
t ta
nk
fro
m t
he
smal
l ho
se o
r p
ipe
con
nec
ted
to
the
bo
tto
m o
f th
e to
ilet
tan
k.
It is
ess
enti
alth
at t
he
flo
at-v
alve
(o
r an
ti-s
iph
on
bal
lco
ck)
insi
de
of
the
toile
t ta
nk
is t
he
corr
ect
typ
eso
th
at t
he
con
ten
ts o
f th
e to
ilet
tan
kd
on
’t g
et b
ack
into
th
e d
rin
kin
gw
ater
sys
tem
in y
ou
r h
ou
se.
As
sho
wn
in t
he
illu
stra
tio
n,
the
anti
-sip
ho
n b
allc
ock
and
ref
ill t
ub
e m
ust
be
abo
ve t
he
wat
er le
vel
in t
he
tan
k.
BA
LLC
OC
K W
ITH
AN
TI-S
IPH
ON
VA
LVE.
MU
ST B
E A
BO
VE
THE
WA
TER
LEV
EL A
T LE
AST
1-IN
CH
MA
KE
UP
TUB
E T
OR
EFIL
L TH
E “B
OW
L”
WA
TER
TO
FLU
SH B
OW
L
TOIL
ETTA
NK
TOIL
ETB
OW
LW
ATE
RLI
NE
FLO
AT
MO
VES
UP
AN
D D
OW
NTO
CO
NTR
OL
WA
TER
LEV
ELIN
TA
NK
FLO
AT
MA
Y A
LSO
BE
A B
ALL
ON
ALO
NG
RO
D
Irri
ga
tio
nIr
rig
atio
n s
yste
ms
mak
e w
ater
ing
of
you
rla
wn
or
gar
den
mu
ch e
asie
r, b
ut
if n
ot
pro
p-
erly
co
nst
ruct
ed, c
on
tam
inan
ts m
ayb
ackf
low
into
yo
ur
dri
nki
ng
wat
er.
Bac
k-fl
ow
pro
tect
ion
may
be
pro
vid
ed w
ith
vacu
um
bre
aker
s (a
tmo
sph
eric
(A
VB
) o
r p
res-
sure
(PV
B o
r SV
B))
or
red
uce
d p
ress
ure
pri
n-
cip
le a
ssem
blie
s (R
P).
Wat
er p
oo
ling
aro
un
d s
pri
nkl
er h
ead
s m
ayb
e co
nta
min
ated
by
chem
ical
s, f
erti
lizer
s, o
ran
imal
was
te.
MU
ST B
E PH
YSI
CA
LLY
SEPA
RA
TED
OR
AIR
-GA
PPED
. (A
PLA
STIC
OR
MET
AL
CLI
P IS
TY
PIC
ALL
YU
SED
TO
HO
LD T
HE
TUB
E IN
PLA
CE)
EXA
MPL
E O
F“A
VB
” W
ITH
CO
NTR
OL
VA
LVE
CO
RR
EC
T
WA
TER
LIN
E
WA
TER
LEV
EL
VA
CU
UM
BR
EAK
ERS
MU
ST B
E IN
STA
LLED
AB
OV
E TH
E G
RO
UN
D, A
ND
AB
OV
E A
LLSP
RIN
KLE
R H
EAD
S[T
YPI
CA
LLY
6-I
NC
HES
FO
R A
VB
, AN
D 1
2-IN
CH
ES F
OR
PV
B O
R S
VB
]
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 25 of 30
Appendix E
The Data Spreadsheet
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 26 of 30
1/2
conv
entio
n in
dica
tes
one
prot
ecte
d cr
oss-
conn
ectio
n of
two
disc
over
edSu
rvey
Dat
e
Year Home Built (approx.)
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
# of CC
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
Type of CC
Degree of Hazard
CC
DO
HC
CD
OH
CC
DO
HT
ype
of C
CD
egre
e of
H
azar
d
9048
12/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
3/3
H0/
2H
0/2
HD
H8
1267
1922
5/20
/02
DH
DH
DH
DH
9030
21/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H7
978
5/20
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9029
31/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/3
HI
H6
1060
1900
5/20
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9047
41/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
913
6919
745/
20/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9097
51/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/2
HI
H5
1050
1989
5/20
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9016
61/
2H
5/5
H2/
2H
7/7
H3/
3H
0/2
HI
H18
2186
1998
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9014
71/
2H
5/5
H1/
1H
9/10
H0/
3H
2/2
HI
H18
2378
1991
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9053
81/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H9
1275
1964
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9028
91/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
5/5
H2/
3H
1/2
HI
H13
1587
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9019
101/
2N
H2/
2H
2/2
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
711
6419
005/
21/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9003
111/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/3
H0/
2H
0/2
HI
H8
1267
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9045
121/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/2
HI
H9
1369
1973
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9009
132/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
5/5
H2/
3H
2/3
HI
H15
1788
1996
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9034
141/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/3
H2/
2H
0/1
HI
H10
1191
1972
5/21
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9035
150/
1H
2/2
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
3H
IH
1115
7319
195/
22/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9013
161/
1H
4/4
H2/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
2/2
HI
H14
1593
1936
5/22
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9036
172/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
5/5
H2/
3H
1/2
H1/
2H
DH
1620
8019
715/
22/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9115
181/
2H
4/4
H1/
1H
5/5
H3/
3H
2/2
HI
H16
1794
1999
9/27
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9066
191/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
5/5
H2/
3H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
1317
769/
25/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9142
201/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
3/3
H2/
2H
0/1
HI
H10
1283
9/25
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9109
211/
2H
2/2
H2/
2H
2/3
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H8
1173
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9127
221/
2H
4/4
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/4
HI
H10
1759
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9098
231/
1H
1/4
H4/
4H
2/2
H5/
5H
0/2
H0/
3H
IH
1321
6219
689/
26/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9161
241/
2H
2/2
H1/
1H
3/3
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
913
699/
26/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9138
251/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
6/6
H0/
3H
1/4
HI
H13
1968
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9112
261/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H7
888
1936
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9178
271/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/3
HI
H7
1258
1916
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9183
282/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
7/7
H4/
4H
0/2
HI
H17
1989
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9111
291/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
1/2
HI
H10
1191
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9116
301/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
5/5
H1/
3H
0/2
HI
H11
1669
9/26
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9046
311/
1H
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
3/3
H2/
2H
IH
1719
899/
26/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9175
321/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/2
HI
H8
1173
9/27
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9128
331/
2H
3/3
H3/
3H
1/1
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H9
1275
9/27
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9186
341/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
7/7
H2/
3H
0/2
HI
H14
1878
9/27
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9162
351/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/4
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H10
1471
9/27
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9146
361/
2H
2/2
H1/
1H
4/4
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
913
699/
27/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9131
371/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H8
989
1920
's9/
27/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9119
381/
1H
3/4
H1/
2H
2/2
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
914
649/
27/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9055
391/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
59
5619
999/
27/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9157
401/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
5/5
H2/
2H
2/2
HN
one
Non
e14
1410
09/
27/0
2N
one
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Non
eN
one
Non
e
9213
411/
2H
2/2
H2/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H9
1275
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9156
421/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
4/4
H2/
2H
1/2
H1/
2H
IH
1214
8610
/24/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9087
431/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
0/2
H1/
1H
1/2
HI
H5
863
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9326
441/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
5/5
H1/
3H
0/2
HI
H12
1675
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9032
451/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H11
1669
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9106
461/
2H
4/4
H1/
1H
4/4
H2/
2H
0/2
HI
H12
1580
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9185
471/
2H
2/2
H1/
2H
2/3
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H7
1164
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9302
480/
1H
3/3
H0/
1H
1/2
H0/
1H
IH
48
5010
/24/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9107
491/
2H
2/2
H1/
1H
3/4
H0/
2H
0/4
HI
H7
1547
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9284
501/
2H
3/3
H1/
2H
3/3
H1/
2H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
1015
6710
/24/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9078
511/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
5/5
H0/
3H
0/2
HI
H10
1663
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9134
521/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/5
H1/
2H
1/1
H0/
4H
IH
1018
5610
/25/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9081
531/
1H
3/4
H3/
3H
3/3
H0/
2H
1/1
H0/
2H
DH
1116
6910
/24/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9151
541/
2H
4/4
H1/
1H
4/5
H1/
3H
0/2
HI
H11
1765
10/2
4/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9153
551/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
1/3
H2/
2H
0/2
HI
H9
1369
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9379
561/
3H
3/3
H2/
2H
6/6
H3/
3H
0/3
HI
H15
2075
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9344
571/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H9
1090
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9015
581/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/5
H3/
3H
0/1
H2/
4H
IH
1419
7410
/25/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9266
591/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/4
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H10
1471
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9235
601/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
2/3
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H9
1560
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9174
611/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H9
1275
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9313
621/
2H
2/2
H1/
2H
3/5
H0/
2H
0/2
HI
H7
1547
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9010
631/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/2
HI
H8
1173
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9312
640/
1H
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
1H
0/1
HD
H9
1182
10/2
5/02
DH
DH
DH
DH
9105
651/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H7
978
10/2
5/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9264
661/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/3
H0/
2H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
914
6410
/30/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
Protected connections
Fin
al D
eter
min
atio
n
Rev
iew
er #
1
(PA
S) (
LL
C)
Rev
iew
er #
2
(HW
C)
Rev
iew
er #
3
% protected Connections
Total Water Connections
Kitchen
Laundry
Overall Assessment
Bathrooms
Pool/Spa
Tanks, Vats
Hosebibbs
Toilets
Heating / Cooling
USC ID #
Aux Water
Fire Sprinkler
Irrigation
Survey No.
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 27 of 30
1/2
conv
entio
n in
dica
tes
one
prot
ecte
d cr
oss-
conn
ectio
n of
two
disc
over
edSu
rvey
Dat
e
Year Home Built (approx.)
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
# of CC
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
Type of CC
Degree of Hazard
CC
DO
HC
CD
OH
CC
DO
HT
ype
of C
CD
egre
e of
H
azar
d
Protected connections
Fin
al D
eter
min
atio
n
Rev
iew
er #
1
(PA
S) (
LL
C)
Rev
iew
er #
2
(HW
C)
Rev
iew
er #
3
% protected Connections
Total Water Connections
Kitchen
Laundry
Overall Assessment
Bathrooms
Pool/Spa
Tanks, Vats
Hosebibbs
Toilets
Heating / Cooling
USC ID #
Aux Water
Fire Sprinkler
Irrigation
Survey No.
9252
671/
1H
2/2
H2/
2H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/1
HI
H7
978
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9137
681/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
4/5
H3/
3H
0/3
HI
H13
1776
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9351
691/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
1/2
H0/
1H
1/1
HI
H5
771
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9165
701/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H8
1173
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9336
711/
1H
4/4
H1/
1H
5/6
H1/
3H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1419
7410
/30/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9287
721/
2H
2/2
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/2
HI
H8
1362
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9022
731/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/4
HI
H9
1656
1960
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9386
741/
1H
2/2
H2/
2H
3/4
H0/
1H
0/1
HI
H8
1173
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9307
751/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/2
HI
H7
1070
10/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9372
761/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
3/4
H1/
2H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
1015
6719
2010
/30/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9317
771/
1H
4/4
H2/
2H
5/5
H1/
3H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
1418
7810
/31/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9099
781/
1H
3/3
H2/
2H
6/7
H2/
4H
0/2
HI
H15
2075
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9230
791/
1H
3/3
H3/
3H
6/6
H3/
3H
1/1
H0/
4H
IH
1721
8110
/31/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9316
801/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H8
1173
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9132
811/
2H
2/2
H1/
2H
3/5
H1/
3H
0/2
HI
H8
1650
1869
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9092
821/
2H
2/2
H1/
1H
2/3
H2/
2H
0/1
HI
H8
1173
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9188
831/
2H
3/3
H1/
3H
5/6
H1/
3H
1/2
HI
H12
1963
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9082
841/
1H
1/1
H1/
2H
0/1
H1/
1H
0/3
HI
H4
944
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9032
851/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
1/2
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H7
1164
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9070
861/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
4/4
H0/
2H
0/1
HI
H7
1070
10/3
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9039
871/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
3/3
H2/
2H
0/2
HI
H8
1267
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9236
881/
1H
4/4
H1/
2H
3/5
H0/
3H
0/2
HD
H9
1753
1950
's11
/7/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9108
891/
2H
4/4
H1/
2H
3/5
H0/
3H
0/3
HI
H9
1947
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9277
901/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H6
786
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9234
911/
2H
4/4
H1/
1H
6/6
H3/
3H
0/3
HI
H15
1979
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9122
921/
1H
3/3
H1/
1H
4/4
H1/
2H
0/2
HI
H10
1377
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9091
931/
2H
4/4
H3/
3H
4/4
H2/
2H
0/2
HI
H14
1782
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9225
941/
1H
1/1
H1/
1H
1/2
H0/
1H
0/1
HI
H4
757
11/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9160
951/
2H
3/3
H1/
2H
3/3
H0/
1H
0/4
HI
H8
1553
11/8
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9291
962/
3H
3/3
H1/
1H
6/6
H3/
3H
0/2
HI
H15
1883
11/8
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9314
971/
1H
3/3
H1/
2H
4/4
H2/
3H
0/1
HI
H11
1479
11/8
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9200
981/
2H
3/3
H1/
2H
4/5
H2/
3H
0/1
H0/
2H
DH
1118
6111
/8/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9332
991/
2H
3/3
H1/
1H
8/8
H0/
4H
1/3
HI
H14
2167
11/8
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9254
100
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H1/
2H
1/1
H0/
1H
IH
811
7311
/8/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9339
101
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H0/
1H
IH
911
8211
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9126
102
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
IH
89
8911
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9123
103
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
1/3
H2/
2H
IH
1418
7811
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9064
104
2/2
H6/
6H
1/1
H7/
9H
3/4
H0/
5H
IH
1725
6811
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9073
105
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
69
6718
8011
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9061
106
1/1
H1/
2H
3/3
H2/
2H
5/5
H2/
3H
3/3
HI
H17
1989
11/2
1/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9361
107
1/2
H4/
4H
2/2
H2/
3H
0/2
H0/
3H
IH
916
5611
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9371
108
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1114
7911
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9244
109
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H3/
4H
0/2
H0/
2H
IH
915
6011
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9214
110
1/1
H2/
2H
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H2/
2H
IH
1112
9211
/21/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9219
111
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H3/
3H
2/2
H0/
1H
0/1
HI
H10
1377
11/2
2/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9263
112
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H1/
2H
IH
1114
7911
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9171
113
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H3/
3H
1/2
H0/
2H
IH
1013
7711
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9272
114
1/1
H1/
1H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
HI
H5
683
11/2
2/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9355
115
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H8/
8H
2/4
H0/
2H
IH
1620
8011
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9117
116
1/2
H1/
1H
2/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H0/
1H
IH
912
7511
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9002
117
1/2
H2/
2H
1/1
H3/
3H
0/2
H0/
2H
IH
712
5811
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9267
118
1/2
H3/
3H
2/2
H4/
4H
3/3
H0/
2H
IH
1316
8111
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9145
119
1/2
H2/
2H
1/2
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
610
6018
8811
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9375
120
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
69
6711
/22/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9176
121
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
3/3
H0/
2H
IH
1418
7811
/23/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9202
122
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H2/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
913
6911
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9065
123
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H3/
4H
0/2
H0/
1H
IH
913
6911
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9296
124
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
58
6311
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9240
125
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
79
7811
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9305
126
1/2
H2/
2H
1/2
H4/
4H
1/3
H0/
2H
IH
915
6011
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9322
127
1/1
H3/
3H
2/2
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1214
8611
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9222
128
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
0/2
H0/
2H
IH
812
6711
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9308
129
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H3/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1114
7911
/29/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9018
130
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
59
5611
/30/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9269
131
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
1/1
HI
H6
786
11/3
0/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9228
132
1/1
H3/
3H
1/2
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1114
7919
7012
/5/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 28 of 30
1/2
conv
entio
n in
dica
tes
one
prot
ecte
d cr
oss-
conn
ectio
n of
two
disc
over
edSu
rvey
Dat
e
Year Home Built (approx.)
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
# of CC
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
Type of CC
Degree of Hazard
CC
DO
HC
CD
OH
CC
DO
HT
ype
of C
CD
egre
e of
H
azar
d
Protected connections
Fin
al D
eter
min
atio
n
Rev
iew
er #
1
(PA
S) (
LL
C)
Rev
iew
er #
2
(HW
C)
Rev
iew
er #
3
% protected Connections
Total Water Connections
Kitchen
Laundry
Overall Assessment
Bathrooms
Pool/Spa
Tanks, Vats
Hosebibbs
Toilets
Heating / Cooling
USC ID #
Aux Water
Fire Sprinkler
Irrigation
Survey No.
9391
133
0/1
H1/
1H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
DH
48
5019
7912
/5/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9398
134
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H3/
5H
3/3
H1/
3H
IH
1216
7519
0012
/5/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9049
135
1/2
H3/
3H
1/2
H3/
4H
0/2
H1/
1H
0/2
HI
H9
1656
1940
12/5
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9161
136
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
2/2
H1/
2H
IH
1417
8219
7512
/5/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9035
137
1/1
H4/
4H
1/3
H6/
6H
2/3
H0/
2H
IH
1419
7419
9912
/5/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9164
138
1/2
H1/
1H
1/1
H5/
5H
0/3
H0/
2H
IH
814
5719
5212
/5/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9051
139
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H8/
8H
2/4
H1/
2H
DH
1720
8519
7712
/5/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9110
140
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H2/
3H
1/1
H0/
2H
IH
812
6719
2512
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9323
141
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H4/
5H
3/3
H0/
1H
0/2
HI
H13
1776
1996
12/6
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9265
142
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H2/
2H
NN
1313
100
1990
12/6
/02
NN
NN
NN
NN
9155
143
1/2
H3/
3H
1/2
H5/
5H
3/3
H1/
2H
IH
1417
8219
7012
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9268
144
1/2
H1/
1H
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H0/
1H
DH
811
7319
5312
/6/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9229
145
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H3/
3H
0/1
H0/
2H
IH
710
7019
6312
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9090
146
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H3/
3H
0/2
H0/
1H
IH
812
6719
6712
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9120
147
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
0/3
H0/
2H
IH
1117
6519
6512
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9024
148
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H4/
5H
0/2
H0/
1H
IH
914
6419
3012
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9329
149
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H3/
3H
0/2
H0/
1H
IH
913
6919
2012
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9282
150
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H3/
3H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
911
8219
2512
/6/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9292
151
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
DH
812
6719
6312
/7/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9242
152
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H6/
6H
1/4
H0/
2H
DH
1320
6519
8112
/7/0
2D
HD
HD
HD
H
9203
153
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H0/
1H
IH
910
9019
2012
/7/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9204
154
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H0/
1H
IH
79
7819
5412
/7/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9274
155
1/1
H2/
2H
1/3
H0/
1H
0/1
HI
H4
850
1900
12/7
/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9300
156
1/1
H6/
6H
1/1
H6/
6H
2/3
H0/
4H
IH
1621
7619
8012
/7/0
2I
HI
HI
HI
H
9067
157
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H5/
5H
3/3
H0/
2H
IH
1416
8819
6512
/13/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9298
158
1/1
H4/
4H
1/1
H7/
7H
3/3
H2/
2H
NN
1818
100
1990
12/1
3/02
NN
NN
NN
NN
9182
159
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
DH
68
7519
0012
/13/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9100
160
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H5/
5H
2/3
H0/
2H
IH
1318
7219
7412
/13/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9376
161
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1012
8319
5912
/13/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9221
162
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H0/
1H
DH
911
8219
3912
/13/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9348
163
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H3/
3H
1/2
H0/
1H
IH
911
8219
8012
/13/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9006
164
1/1
H2/
2H
2/2
H5/
5H
2/3
H0/
2H
IH
1215
8019
5012
/14/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9005
165
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H7/
7H
4/4
H0/
1H
IH
1719
8919
7812
/14/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9026
166
1/1
H1/
1H
2/2
H1/
1H
NN
55
100
1960
12/1
4/02
NN
NN
NN
NN
9220
167
1/2
H2/
2H
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1013
7719
6512
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9311
168
1/2
H3/
3H
1/2
H4/
4H
2/2
H1/
2H
IH
1215
8019
7812
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9184
169
1/1
H2/
2H
2/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H2/
2H
IH
1213
9219
6012
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9276
170
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H0/
1H
IH
78
8819
2512
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9147
171
1/2
H3/
3H
1/2
H7/
7H
3/3
H1/
1H
1/2
HI
H17
2085
1979
12/1
9/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9012
172
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H7/
7H
1/3
H1/
2H
IH
1418
7819
7612
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9366
173
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H1/
2H
1/2
H0/
2H
IH
913
6919
7112
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9041
174
1/1
H4/
4H
1/2
H7/
7H
4/4
H0/
2H
IH
1720
8519
8912
/19/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9199
175
1/1
H1/
2H
1/2
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
DH
59
5619
5212
/19/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9217
176
1/1
H3/
3H
1/2
H1/
2H
1/1
H1/
1H
0/1
HI
H8
1173
1940
12/1
9/02
IH
IH
IH
IH
9211
177
1/2
H4/
4H
1/1
H7/
7H
2/4
H2/
2H
DH
1720
8519
9512
/20/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9319
178
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H7/
7H
3/3
H3/
4H
IH
1922
8619
9212
/20/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9113
179
1/1
H1/
1H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
DH
57
7119
7512
/20/
02D
HD
HD
HD
H
9179
180
1/1
H1/
2H
3/3
H1/
3H
5/5
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
3H
IH
1519
7919
8012
/20/
02I
HI
HI
HI
H
9093
181
1/2
H4/
4H
1/2
H4/
4H
2/2
H0/
2H
IH
1216
7519
101/
9/03
IH
IH
IH
IH
9069
182
1/1
H3/
3H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
2H
DH
710
7019
751/
9/03
DH
DH
DH
DH
9201
183
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H2/
2H
0/1
H0/
1H
IH
68
7519
701/
9/03
IH
IH
IH
IH
9249
184
1/1
H4/
4H
2/2
H4/
5H
1/3
H0/
2H
DH
1217
7119
721/
9/03
DH
DH
DH
DH
9271
185
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
H1/
2H
0/1
H0/
3H
DH
510
5019
721/
9/03
DH
DH
DH
DH
9139
186
1/2
H1/
1H
1/2
H3/
3H
1/1
H0/
1H
IH
710
7019
551/
9/03
IH
IH
IH
IH
9259
187
1/1
H1/
1H
1/1
H2/
2H
1/1
HN
N6
610
019
711/
9/03
NN
NN
NN
NN
9071
188
1/1
H3/
3H
1/2
H4/
4H
0/2
H0/
2H
IH
914
6419
781/
9/03
IH
IH
IH
IH
64 81
Su
rvey
No
.C
om
men
t
1
171
53 86 88 98
Toi
let f
ill v
alve
sub
mer
ged
Sof
tene
r di
rect
to d
rain
/Flu
idM
aste
r 20
0A
Sof
tene
r di
rect
to d
rain
/Flu
idM
aste
r 20
0A
Wel
l
Boi
ler
Con
do
3 H
ushf
low
to T
oile
t fill
val
ves
Boi
ler
with
Che
mic
als
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 29 of 30
1/2
conv
entio
n in
dica
tes
one
prot
ecte
d cr
oss-
conn
ectio
n of
two
disc
over
edSu
rvey
Dat
e
Year Home Built (approx.)
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
# of CC
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
# of CC
Hazard
Type of CC
Degree of Hazard
CC
DO
HC
CD
OH
CC
DO
HT
ype
of C
CD
egre
e of
H
azar
d
Protected connections
Fin
al D
eter
min
atio
n
Rev
iew
er #
1
(PA
S) (
LL
C)
Rev
iew
er #
2
(HW
C)
Rev
iew
er #
3
% protected Connections
Total Water Connections
Kitchen
Laundry
Overall Assessment
Bathrooms
Pool/Spa
Tanks, Vats
Hosebibbs
Toilets
Heating / Cooling
USC ID #
Aux Water
Fire Sprinkler
Irrigation
Survey No.
185
Flu
idm
aste
r 20
0
187
Mob
ile H
ome
182
Fill
val
ve to
o lo
w
184
Hus
hflo
w
177
Fill
val
ve to
o lo
w
179
Fill
val
ve to
o lo
w
162
Sub
mer
ged
fill l
ine
175
156
Fill
val
ve to
o lo
w
159
Flu
shm
aste
r 20
0
Old
Wel
l
133
139
141
144
147
151
152
154
Flu
idm
aste
r 20
0
Hus
hflo
w
Sof
tner
Old
Wel
l
Boi
ler,
no
chem
ical
s
subm
erge
d fil
l lin
e
Flu
idm
aste
r 20
0
Hus
hflo
w
Prevelence of Cross-Connections in Household Plumbing Systems-University of Southern California Page 30 of 30