MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC 1 Navigating the New EDGAR.
Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
-
Upload
jewel-lyons -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
![Page 1: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presented byMichael [email protected] [email protected] & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2011
![Page 2: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
White House, OMB, Duncan pushing significant cuts
Anti-Federalism Rhetoric Deficit Reduction Tech Prep Termination Ineffective Advocacy Regulatory Flexibility
2
![Page 3: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
February 2010 – Obama proposes elimination of Tech Prep for 7/1/11
July 1, 2010 – Perkins and Tech Prep remain level funded (7/1/10 – 6/30/11)
October 1, 2010 – Congress fails to pass Labor/ED/HHS Appropriation CR
February 2011 – Obama proposes 20% cut to CTE
3
![Page 4: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
April 2011 Congress enacts Appropriations for 7/1/11 – 6/30/12Tech Prep N0 funds$138 million cut
4
![Page 5: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
October 1, 2011 – no appropriations yet for 7/1/12, but CR contains 1.5% cut for 75% on S/A programs, including Perkins
5
![Page 6: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CR – Level fund Perkins Basic Grant for 7/1/12 – 6/30/13
But will deficit reduction cut be spread evenly among education programs?
6
![Page 7: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why did Obama throw CTE under the bus?
7
![Page 8: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1. Does CTE have political muscle to complain?
2. Are Duncan’s claims of CTE ineffectiveness based on Chicago experience?
3. Does CTE now represent “low hanging fruit”?
4. How does CTE respond to two pillars of federal education support?
8
![Page 9: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What does the data show?
9
![Page 10: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Does the future of CTE rest with DOL/ETA?
$2 billion for TAA C3T Grant
10
![Page 11: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ED expects reauthorization (Perkins V) in 2013
11
![Page 12: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Recognized shortcomings of current law:1. Silos created between secondary and
postsecondary because of formula2. Inability to count CTE courses toward
academic credit at secondary level3. Lack of business involvement leads to
funding CTE programs not in demand4. Lack of incentives to exceed performance5. Accountability system does not lead to
compliance data on outcomes12
![Page 13: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
States only fund consortia of secondary and postsecondary to facilitate collaboration and alignment
13
![Page 14: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Allow CTE students to gain academic credit
14
![Page 15: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Minimum thresholds for involvement of
business, industry, labor (including cash or in-kind
match from private sector)
15
![Page 16: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Performance based funding to incentivize and reward eligible consortia to exceed performance targets
16
![Page 17: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Creation of an innovation fund to spur new practices
17
![Page 18: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Remake the accountability system using uniformly defined participation and performance measures
18
![Page 19: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Scale high-impact CTE programs of study
Promote career (employability) skills for all students
Remake the CTE accountability systemStrengthen accountability systems to
create common performance and participation definitions
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. September 15, 2011. CTE Transformation Strategy. Presented during CTE State Directors Webinar.
20
![Page 21: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Purpose Reach agreement with states on student
participation definitions and measurement approaches for core performance indicators
Identify and reach agreement on any “progress” measures in addition to core indicators
21
![Page 22: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Ultimate outcomes Agreement among states on student
participation, core indicator definitions (numerators/denominators) and measurement approach consistency, which will inform the Department’s blueprint for Perkins reauthorization
22
![Page 23: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Timeline November 2011–April 2012:
Prepare recommendations for small set of core performance indicators
May 2012–October 2012: Prepare recommendations for additional progress indicators
23
![Page 24: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Participation Single/separate definition for secondary
and postsecondary participationDifferent levels of participation
(explorer, concentrator, participant, completer, etc.)
Amount of dosage in measurements of: clock hours, courses, credits, sequences, programs (consortia), etc.
Groupings of participation (entry/exit cohort, mastery, standards, etc.)
24
![Page 25: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Department is leaning toward fewer indicators GraduationCollege creditIndustry credentialsEmployment and earnings
25
![Page 26: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
No focus on:Technical skills attainmentAcademic proficiencies
But disaggregated data would be required
26
![Page 27: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Yr 1Formula
Allocation
Admin.Up to 5%
State Ldr. ActivitiesUp to 15%
Local Distribution
Up to 80%
Eligible Recipients
100% of 80%
Performance Based Funding
0% of 80%
In the first year after the date of enactment, 100% of the money for local distribution would go to eligible recipients by formula and 0% would be allocated for performance funding (see diagram below):
27
![Page 28: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Yr 2 & BeyondFormula
Allocation
Admin.Up to 5%
State Ldr. ActivitiesUp to 15%
Local Distribution
Up to 80%
Eligible Recipients
80-95% of 80%
Performance Based
Funding5-20% of 80%
In the second year after the date of enactment, 80-95% of the funds for local distribution would go to eligible recipients by formula and 5-20% would be awarded based on eligible recipients exceeding negotiated performance targets (see diagram below):
28
![Page 29: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Funding for CTSOs Uniform Definitions OCR / MOA $ for WIA One Stops Silo Smashing
29
![Page 30: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
![Page 31: Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1b0e7f8b9ab05998d007/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
31