Presentation Vimala Nairwaterinstitute.ufl.edu/research/projects/downloads/...vimala_nair.pdf · A...

24
A E Bh Bw A E Bh Bw Phosphorus storage and release characteristics pertinent to watertable management and BMP implementation for Okeechobee Basin soils Vimala Nair Soil and Water Science Department University of Florida June 04, 2008

Transcript of Presentation Vimala Nairwaterinstitute.ufl.edu/research/projects/downloads/...vimala_nair.pdf · A...

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

Bw

Phosphorus storage and release characteristics pertinent to watertable management and BMP

implementation for Okeechobee Basin soils

Vimala NairSoil and Water Science Department

University of Florida

June 04, 2008

22

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwOutline

• Phosphorus issues in the Lake Okeechobee Basin (LOB) and contributors to research activities

• Soils of the LOB• Soil test P as a risk assessment tool and the need for an

alternate protocol• A new concept – the “safe” soil P storage capacity

(SPSC)• Applications of SPSC• Our progress …• What needs to be done …• Other related research needs in the LOB

33

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwPhosphorus Transfer

Wetlands & Streams

[sink/source]

LakeOkeechobee

Lake [sink]

Uplands[sink/source]

Fertilizers, Animal wastesBiosolids, Wastewaters

Credit: K. R. Reddy and P. Inglett

44

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwSoils of the Lake Okeechobee County

Histosols2%

Alfisols3% Mollisols

4%Inceptisols4%

Others 11%

Entisols12%

Spodosols64%

Source: Vickie Hoge

55

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwSoils of Florida Watersheds

Sand grain coatings,

their presence or absence,

makes a bigdifference in

P retention capacity

A

E

Bh

Bw

Entisol

SpodosolCredit: Willie Harris

66

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwThe Need for a New Protocol

• Low value of soil test P (STP) is not necessarily an indicator of low environmental risk if P is added to a soil

• Some sandy soils, such as the Spodosols of the LOB could have 99% quartz sand in the upper horizons and negligible P retention

• STP does not convey the amount of P that can be safely added to a soil in an absolute sense

Nair, V.D., and W.G. Harris. 2004. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 47:491-497.

77

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwDevelopment of a New Protocol

• Based on extractable P of soil• Also on P retention capacity of soil (related to Fe+Al)• New tool: “Safe” Soil P Storage Capacity (SPSC)• Calculations based on oxalate-extractable P, Fe and Al• Calculations can also be based on P, Fe and Al in

Mehlich 1 or Mehlich 3 solutions

USDA-IFAFS

88

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwP Saturation Ratio (PSR)

• Ex-P/ [ExFe + ExAl] (Ex = Extractable)

• Change point ~ 0.10• Confidence intervals: 0.05

– 0.15• Threshold PSR: 0.15

Nair, V.D., K.M. Portier, D.A. Graetz, andM.L. Walker. 2004. J. Environ. Qual. 33:107-113.

FDEP

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 .125 .025 .375 0.5 .625 .75 .875

Wat

er S

olub

le P

(mg

kg-1

)

Surface HorizonSubsurface Horizon

PSR M1

Change point = 0.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5PSROX

Wat

er S

olub

le P

(mg

kg-1

)

Surface HorizonSubsurface Horizon

Change point = 0.1

99

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwThe Approach – “Safe” Soil Phosphorus Storage Capacity (SPSC)

31*2756 ⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣⎡ +

AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*

2756 ⎥⎦⎤

⎢⎣⎡ +

AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *

Nair, V.D., and W.G. Harris. 2004. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 47:491-497.

• SPSC can also be expressed in mmoles P kg-1, or kg P ha-1

• SPSC is additive; SPSC for horizons within a sandy soil can be added providing a single value for a designated depth

(mg P kg-1)

Sink when soil PSR < 0.15 (positive SPSC)Source when Soil PSR > 0.15 (negative SPSC)

1010

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

Bw

SPSC Calculations using Soil Test Parameters

Why do we need conversion factors for SPSC calculations using STP?

(mg P kg-1)

(mg P kg-1)

31*2756 ⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣⎡ + AlOxalateFeOxalate

SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*2756 ⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣⎡ + AlOxalateFeOxalate

SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *

56⎢⎣⎡

+Mehlich 1

SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 56⎢⎣

⎡ Fe SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *

27AlMehlich 1 31*⎥⎦⎤⎥⎦⎤

* ?

1111

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwConversion Factors for A & E Horizons

y = 2.24x - 2.92R² = 0.84n = 760

-1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200

SPSC-M1 (mg kg-1)

SPSC

-Ox

(mg

kg-1

)

Okeechobee A & E horizons

1212

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwSPSC and Water Soluble P (WSP)

• Soil is a P sink when SPSC is positive and a source when SPSC is negative

• Similar observation under field conditions

• 95% of samples with positive SPSC (soil is a P sink) indicate less than 0.1 mg L-1 P in solution

Chrysostome, M, V.D. Nair, W.G. Harris, and R.D. Rhue. 2007. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71:1564–1569.

Column Study Set-up

y = -65.89x - 25.41R2= 0.88

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Average leachate P concentration (mg L -1)

Initi

al S

PSC

(mg

P kg

-1)

Lab

P source

P sink

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

WSP (mg kg-1)

SPSC

(mg

kg-1

)

n = 604

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

100

200

300

400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

WSP (mg kg-

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

-

-

-

-

-

- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-1 )

SPSC

(mg

kg-1

) n = 604

Field

P source

P sink

1313

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwApplication: Soils of LOB

A

E

Bh

Bw

Spodosol Profile

SFWMD; FDACS

SPSC (kg haSPSC (kg ha 1- )0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Dep

th (c

m)

AE

Bh

Bw2

Bw1

B ’h

a

0

20

40

60

80

100

-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000

E1

BhBw

E2

0

20

40

60

80

b

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000A

EBhBh

Bw2

Bw1Bw1

B ’hB ’h

a

AAE

E1

BhBw

E2

0

20

40

60

80

b

AAE

0

20

40

60

80

100

-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000

Dep

th (c

m) E1

BhBw

E2

0

20

40

60

80

b

AAAE

0

100

-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000

E1

Bh

Bw

E2

0

20

40

60

80

b

Minimally impacted

Impacted

0

20

40

60

80

100

P sink

P source

1414

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwApplications

0102030405060708090

100

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Dep

th, c

m0

102030405060708090

100

- 200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400D

epth

, cm

0102030405060708090

100

- 200

Soil P Storage Capacity, kg P ha-1

Dep

th, c

m0

102030405060708090

100

Dep

th, c

m

Tree-based vs tree-less pasture

Nair, V.D. P.K.R. Nair, R.S. Kalmbacher, and I.V. Ezenwa. 2007. Ecol. Eng. 29:192-199. Michel, G.-A., V.D. Nair, P.K.R. Nair. 2007. Plant Soil. 297:267-276.

USDA/IFAFS, through the Center for Subtropical Agroforestry

SPSC=1495 kg P ha-1

SPSC=370 kg P ha-1

SPSC increased by ~ 60 kg P ha-1 yr-1 in presence of trees

1515

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwUse of SPSC for Watertable Monitoring

FDACS

E1

Bh

Bw

E

2

0

20

40

60

80

b

A

AE

0

20

40

60

80

100

-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000

Dep

th (c

m)

E1

Bh

Bw

E

2

0

20

40

60

80

b

AA

AE

0-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000

E1

Bh

Bw

E2

0

Water table

SPSC (kg haSPSC (kg ha 1- )

P sink

P source

1616

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwSoil Series and Watertable

Water table BhBh

Bh

Bh

Ona Myakka Immokalee Pomello

If the “safe” soil P storage capacity above the Bh is the same …..

FDACS

1717

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwBh Horizons and the “Change point”

y = 104.71x - 1.16R2 = 0.64

n = 37

y = 65.541x - 0.9138R 2 = 0.2956, n = 78

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1

PSR -Ox

WSP

(mg

kg-1

)

Change point = 0.10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

PSR ‐M1

WSP

 (mg kg

‐1)

Change point = 0.10

y = 26.2 + 0.08; R2 = 0.53

y = 79.8 + 1.47; R2 = 0.71

• Change point is 0.1using either oxalate orMehlich 1- P, Fe and Al• The value is the same as that for A & E horizons

FDACS

1818

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwOur progress …

• Protocol for SPSC calculation established (using oxalate P, Fe and Al) for A, E, and Bh horizons

• Need to establish protocol for SPSC calculation using easily determined parameters in soil test solutions (Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3)

• Conversion factor for SPSC calculation That factor is ~2.25 for A and E horizons using Mehlich 1 parametersConversion factor for Bh horizons is on-going (using Mehlich 1)Need to obtain conversion factors for both A & E, and Bhhorizons using Mehlich 3

1919

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwThe End Product …..

• Protocol for determining SPSC will be available using Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3 solutions obtainable in soil testing laboratories in Florida

• The SPSC concept, and alternate procedures for its calculation will be available as an EDIS publication, and also available in our soil testing lab

• Able to calculate SPSC to any desired soil depth (Note: SPSC is additive)

• Able to determine if a given soil volume (or mass) is an environmental risk (positive SPSC: P sink; negative SPSC: P source)

2020

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwUses of SPSC for Okeechobee Soils

• Predict P release from a soil within the LOB that can be used to project consequences of water-table manipulations for P control

• Evaluate amount of P that can be safely applied to a soil if manure application is based on N requirements of a crop instead of P requirements

• Calculate the amount of an iron or aluminum- based amendment to be added to a soil as a BMP

31*2756 ⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣⎡ +

AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*

2756 ⎥⎦⎤

⎢⎣⎡ +

AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *

(mg P kg-1)

2121

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwUses of SPSC cont.

• Predict reduction in SPSC with time if the P loading to a soil is known

• Identify suitable areas for location of animal-based agriculture by selecting soils with greater SPSC

• Verify suitability of potential locations for the construction of stormwater treatment areas.

2222

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwPlanned Activities

• Set up lab experiment to evaluate:P release rates from Bh horizons as a function of P loading as measured by i) Mehlich extractable P and ii) SPSC determine if a relationship exists between SPSC and the amount of releasable P in Bh materials.

• Iron-oxide strips as a measure of releasable Pphytoremediationwatertable management

(to control P loss in drainage water from upland soils).

2323

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

BwResearch Areas not Addressed so Far• Use SPSC as a quantitative

approach for concurrently determining crop P requirement while minimizing environmental risks associated with offsite P movement

• Calculate the amount of aluminum or iron based amendment to be added to a soil to maintain near “zero”SPSC to allow unnecessary additions of the material

• SPSC for organic and calcareous soils

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

-600

-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

WSP (mg kg-1)

SPSC

(mg

kg-1

)

n = 604

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

100

200

300

400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

WSP (mg kg-

y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147

-

-

-

-

-

- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-1 )

SPSC

(mg

kg-1

)

n = 604

5%0%

2%

61%

32%

24%

3%

2%

37%

34%Labile-P

Fe/Al-P

Organic-P

Ca/Mg-P

Residual P

Dairy manure Beef manure

TP = ~6000mg/kgTP = ~8000mg/kg

Nair, V.D., D.A. Graetz, and D.O. Dooley. 2003. J. Food Agric. Environ. 1: 217-223

• SPSC and P source effects

P sink

P source

2424

A

E

Bh

Bw

A

E

Bh

Bw

Thank you!