Presentation Vimala Nairwaterinstitute.ufl.edu/research/projects/downloads/...vimala_nair.pdf · A...
Transcript of Presentation Vimala Nairwaterinstitute.ufl.edu/research/projects/downloads/...vimala_nair.pdf · A...
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
Bw
Phosphorus storage and release characteristics pertinent to watertable management and BMP
implementation for Okeechobee Basin soils
Vimala NairSoil and Water Science Department
University of Florida
June 04, 2008
22
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwOutline
• Phosphorus issues in the Lake Okeechobee Basin (LOB) and contributors to research activities
• Soils of the LOB• Soil test P as a risk assessment tool and the need for an
alternate protocol• A new concept – the “safe” soil P storage capacity
(SPSC)• Applications of SPSC• Our progress …• What needs to be done …• Other related research needs in the LOB
33
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwPhosphorus Transfer
Wetlands & Streams
[sink/source]
LakeOkeechobee
Lake [sink]
Uplands[sink/source]
Fertilizers, Animal wastesBiosolids, Wastewaters
Credit: K. R. Reddy and P. Inglett
44
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwSoils of the Lake Okeechobee County
Histosols2%
Alfisols3% Mollisols
4%Inceptisols4%
Others 11%
Entisols12%
Spodosols64%
Source: Vickie Hoge
55
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwSoils of Florida Watersheds
Sand grain coatings,
their presence or absence,
makes a bigdifference in
P retention capacity
A
E
Bh
Bw
Entisol
SpodosolCredit: Willie Harris
66
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwThe Need for a New Protocol
• Low value of soil test P (STP) is not necessarily an indicator of low environmental risk if P is added to a soil
• Some sandy soils, such as the Spodosols of the LOB could have 99% quartz sand in the upper horizons and negligible P retention
• STP does not convey the amount of P that can be safely added to a soil in an absolute sense
Nair, V.D., and W.G. Harris. 2004. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 47:491-497.
77
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwDevelopment of a New Protocol
• Based on extractable P of soil• Also on P retention capacity of soil (related to Fe+Al)• New tool: “Safe” Soil P Storage Capacity (SPSC)• Calculations based on oxalate-extractable P, Fe and Al• Calculations can also be based on P, Fe and Al in
Mehlich 1 or Mehlich 3 solutions
USDA-IFAFS
88
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwP Saturation Ratio (PSR)
• Ex-P/ [ExFe + ExAl] (Ex = Extractable)
• Change point ~ 0.10• Confidence intervals: 0.05
– 0.15• Threshold PSR: 0.15
Nair, V.D., K.M. Portier, D.A. Graetz, andM.L. Walker. 2004. J. Environ. Qual. 33:107-113.
FDEP
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 .125 .025 .375 0.5 .625 .75 .875
Wat
er S
olub
le P
(mg
kg-1
)
Surface HorizonSubsurface Horizon
PSR M1
Change point = 0.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5PSROX
Wat
er S
olub
le P
(mg
kg-1
)
Surface HorizonSubsurface Horizon
Change point = 0.1
99
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwThe Approach – “Safe” Soil Phosphorus Storage Capacity (SPSC)
31*2756 ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ +
AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*
2756 ⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ +
AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *
Nair, V.D., and W.G. Harris. 2004. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 47:491-497.
• SPSC can also be expressed in mmoles P kg-1, or kg P ha-1
• SPSC is additive; SPSC for horizons within a sandy soil can be added providing a single value for a designated depth
(mg P kg-1)
Sink when soil PSR < 0.15 (positive SPSC)Source when Soil PSR > 0.15 (negative SPSC)
1010
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
Bw
SPSC Calculations using Soil Test Parameters
Why do we need conversion factors for SPSC calculations using STP?
(mg P kg-1)
(mg P kg-1)
31*2756 ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ + AlOxalateFeOxalate
SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*2756 ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ + AlOxalateFeOxalate
SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *
56⎢⎣⎡
+Mehlich 1
SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 56⎢⎣
⎡ Fe SPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *
27AlMehlich 1 31*⎥⎦⎤⎥⎦⎤
* ?
1111
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwConversion Factors for A & E Horizons
y = 2.24x - 2.92R² = 0.84n = 760
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200
SPSC-M1 (mg kg-1)
SPSC
-Ox
(mg
kg-1
)
Okeechobee A & E horizons
1212
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwSPSC and Water Soluble P (WSP)
• Soil is a P sink when SPSC is positive and a source when SPSC is negative
• Similar observation under field conditions
• 95% of samples with positive SPSC (soil is a P sink) indicate less than 0.1 mg L-1 P in solution
Chrysostome, M, V.D. Nair, W.G. Harris, and R.D. Rhue. 2007. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71:1564–1569.
Column Study Set-up
y = -65.89x - 25.41R2= 0.88
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Average leachate P concentration (mg L -1)
Initi
al S
PSC
(mg
P kg
-1)
Lab
P source
P sink
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
WSP (mg kg-1)
SPSC
(mg
kg-1
)
n = 604
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
WSP (mg kg-
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
-
-
-
-
-
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-1 )
SPSC
(mg
kg-1
) n = 604
Field
P source
P sink
1313
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwApplication: Soils of LOB
A
E
Bh
Bw
Spodosol Profile
SFWMD; FDACS
SPSC (kg haSPSC (kg ha 1- )0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Dep
th (c
m)
AE
Bh
Bw2
Bw1
B ’h
a
0
20
40
60
80
100
-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
E1
BhBw
E2
0
20
40
60
80
b
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000A
EBhBh
Bw2
Bw1Bw1
B ’hB ’h
a
AAE
E1
BhBw
E2
0
20
40
60
80
b
AAE
0
20
40
60
80
100
-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
Dep
th (c
m) E1
BhBw
E2
0
20
40
60
80
b
AAAE
0
100
-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
E1
Bh
Bw
E2
0
20
40
60
80
b
Minimally impacted
Impacted
0
20
40
60
80
100
P sink
P source
1414
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwApplications
0102030405060708090
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Dep
th, c
m0
102030405060708090
100
- 200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400D
epth
, cm
0102030405060708090
100
- 200
Soil P Storage Capacity, kg P ha-1
Dep
th, c
m0
102030405060708090
100
Dep
th, c
m
Tree-based vs tree-less pasture
Nair, V.D. P.K.R. Nair, R.S. Kalmbacher, and I.V. Ezenwa. 2007. Ecol. Eng. 29:192-199. Michel, G.-A., V.D. Nair, P.K.R. Nair. 2007. Plant Soil. 297:267-276.
USDA/IFAFS, through the Center for Subtropical Agroforestry
SPSC=1495 kg P ha-1
SPSC=370 kg P ha-1
SPSC increased by ~ 60 kg P ha-1 yr-1 in presence of trees
1515
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwUse of SPSC for Watertable Monitoring
FDACS
E1
Bh
Bw
E
2
0
20
40
60
80
b
A
AE
0
20
40
60
80
100
-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
Dep
th (c
m)
E1
Bh
Bw
E
2
0
20
40
60
80
b
AA
AE
0-400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
E1
Bh
Bw
E2
0
Water table
SPSC (kg haSPSC (kg ha 1- )
P sink
P source
1616
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwSoil Series and Watertable
Water table BhBh
Bh
Bh
Ona Myakka Immokalee Pomello
If the “safe” soil P storage capacity above the Bh is the same …..
FDACS
1717
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwBh Horizons and the “Change point”
y = 104.71x - 1.16R2 = 0.64
n = 37
y = 65.541x - 0.9138R 2 = 0.2956, n = 78
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1
PSR -Ox
WSP
(mg
kg-1
)
Change point = 0.10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
PSR ‐M1
WSP
(mg kg
‐1)
Change point = 0.10
y = 26.2 + 0.08; R2 = 0.53
y = 79.8 + 1.47; R2 = 0.71
• Change point is 0.1using either oxalate orMehlich 1- P, Fe and Al• The value is the same as that for A & E horizons
FDACS
1818
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwOur progress …
• Protocol for SPSC calculation established (using oxalate P, Fe and Al) for A, E, and Bh horizons
• Need to establish protocol for SPSC calculation using easily determined parameters in soil test solutions (Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3)
• Conversion factor for SPSC calculation That factor is ~2.25 for A and E horizons using Mehlich 1 parametersConversion factor for Bh horizons is on-going (using Mehlich 1)Need to obtain conversion factors for both A & E, and Bhhorizons using Mehlich 3
1919
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwThe End Product …..
• Protocol for determining SPSC will be available using Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3 solutions obtainable in soil testing laboratories in Florida
• The SPSC concept, and alternate procedures for its calculation will be available as an EDIS publication, and also available in our soil testing lab
• Able to calculate SPSC to any desired soil depth (Note: SPSC is additive)
• Able to determine if a given soil volume (or mass) is an environmental risk (positive SPSC: P sink; negative SPSC: P source)
2020
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwUses of SPSC for Okeechobee Soils
• Predict P release from a soil within the LOB that can be used to project consequences of water-table manipulations for P control
• Evaluate amount of P that can be safely applied to a soil if manure application is based on N requirements of a crop instead of P requirements
• Calculate the amount of an iron or aluminum- based amendment to be added to a soil as a BMP
31*2756 ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ +
AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) * 31*
2756 ⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ +
AlOxalateFeOxalateSPSC = (0.15 – Soil PSR) *
(mg P kg-1)
2121
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwUses of SPSC cont.
• Predict reduction in SPSC with time if the P loading to a soil is known
• Identify suitable areas for location of animal-based agriculture by selecting soils with greater SPSC
• Verify suitability of potential locations for the construction of stormwater treatment areas.
2222
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwPlanned Activities
• Set up lab experiment to evaluate:P release rates from Bh horizons as a function of P loading as measured by i) Mehlich extractable P and ii) SPSC determine if a relationship exists between SPSC and the amount of releasable P in Bh materials.
• Iron-oxide strips as a measure of releasable Pphytoremediationwatertable management
(to control P loss in drainage water from upland soils).
2323
A
E
Bh
Bw
A
E
Bh
BwResearch Areas not Addressed so Far• Use SPSC as a quantitative
approach for concurrently determining crop P requirement while minimizing environmental risks associated with offsite P movement
• Calculate the amount of aluminum or iron based amendment to be added to a soil to maintain near “zero”SPSC to allow unnecessary additions of the material
• SPSC for organic and calcareous soils
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
WSP (mg kg-1)
SPSC
(mg
kg-1
)
n = 604
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
100
200
300
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
WSP (mg kg-
y = -11.6x –0.9R2 = 0.84n = 147
-
-
-
-
-
- 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-1 )
SPSC
(mg
kg-1
)
n = 604
5%0%
2%
61%
32%
24%
3%
2%
37%
34%Labile-P
Fe/Al-P
Organic-P
Ca/Mg-P
Residual P
Dairy manure Beef manure
TP = ~6000mg/kgTP = ~8000mg/kg
Nair, V.D., D.A. Graetz, and D.O. Dooley. 2003. J. Food Agric. Environ. 1: 217-223
• SPSC and P source effects
P sink
P source