Presentation Arbitration

10
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW

description

Arbitration Private Law

Transcript of Presentation Arbitration

Page 1: Presentation Arbitration

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW

Page 2: Presentation Arbitration

What is International Commercial Arbitration?

Art. 1 (3) of UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. An arbitration is international if:a.) the parties to an arbitration agreement have, at the time of the conclusion

of the agreement, their places of business in different States; orb.) one of the following places is situated outside the State in which the parties

have their places of business:• The place of arbitration if determined in, or pursuant to, the

arbitration agreement• Any place where a substantial part of the obligations of the

commercial relationship is to be performed or the place with which the subject-matter of the dispute is most closely connected; or

c.) the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relate to more than one country

Page 3: Presentation Arbitration

What is ‘commercial’?

• The term commercial should be given a wide interpretation so as to cover matters arising from all relationships of a commercial nature, whether contractual or not. Relationships of a commercial nature include, but are not limited to, the following transactions:Any trade transaction for the supply or exchange of goods or services; distribution agreement; commercial representation or agency; factoring; leasing; construction of works; consulting; engineering; licensing; investment; financing; banking; insurance; exploitation agreement or concession; joint venture and other forms of industrial or business co-operation; carriage of goods or passengers by air, sea, rail, or road(Redfern & Hunter, 2009)

Page 4: Presentation Arbitration

What does an arbitration agreement look like?

• “Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of, relating to or in connection with this contract, including any question regarding its existence, validity or termination, shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the ACICA Arbitration Rules. The seat of arbitration shall be Sydney, Australia. The language of the arbitration shall be English…”(ACICA Services: Arbitration Clauses)

Page 5: Presentation Arbitration

How to arbitrate?

• To resolve a dispute in arbitration, the parties intended to do so, must conclude an arbitration agreement. To enforce the obligation to arbitrate, there must be a valid arbitration agreement

• Article 7 (1) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration:“Arbitration agreement is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement”

• Article 7 (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, valid arbitration agreement:“The term in writing includes ‘an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provide a record of the agreement”

Page 6: Presentation Arbitration

How does an Arbitral Tribunal has jurisdiction?

• In general, an arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction to rule over a dispute if that dispute is intended to be resolved by an arbitration as was contemplated by an arbitration agreement

• Art. 16 (1) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Arbitral tribunal has its competence to rule on its own jurisdiction, in case where one of the parties to the arbitration agreement challenged its jurisdiction (Kompetenz-Kompetenz)

• The jurisdiction of an arbitration will also be tested by the ‘arbitrability’ of the issue of the dispute.

Page 7: Presentation Arbitration

How to enforce an Arbitration award?

• Art. III of New York Convention 1958:“Each contracting state shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them in accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory where the award is relied upon, under the conditions laid down in the following articles…”

• Art. IV of New York Convention 1958:The party shall provides:- authenticated award or authenticated copy of the award- authenticated arbitration agreement or authenticated copy of the arbitration agreement

Page 8: Presentation Arbitration

What are the grounds to reject the enforcement of an award?

• Art. V (1) of New York Convention 1958:Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, only if that party furnishes to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought, under the following grounds: - under a law applicable to them, the arbitration agreement is not valid- the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case

Page 9: Presentation Arbitration

- The award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decision on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decision from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be recognized and enforced

- The composition of the tribunal was not in accordance with the agreement or the law where the arbitration took place

- The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made

Page 10: Presentation Arbitration

Art. V (2) New York Convention 1958:

Recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may also be refused if the competent authority finds that:

-The subject matter of the difference is not capable of the settlement by arbitration under the law of that country-The recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of that country